Recombinant Legionella pneumophila Argininosuccinate synthase (argG)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the format we have in stock. If you have special format requirements, please note them when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery time varies by purchase method and location. Consult your local distributor for specific delivery times. All proteins ship with blue ice packs. Request dry ice in advance for an extra fee.
Notes
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer ingredients, temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form: 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form: 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon arrival. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag, please inform us and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
argG; LPC_2852Argininosuccinate synthase; EC 6.3.4.5; Citrulline--aspartate ligase
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-405
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Legionella pneumophila (strain Corby)
Target Names
argG
Target Protein Sequence
MKKVIKKIAL AYSGGLDTSI MIPWLKEHYE HAEVIAVICD LGQQEDLDTI KNKALKSGAS KAYVVDVKNE FAIQYLWPLV KSGALYEDQY ILGTISRPLI AQKLVEIALT EQVNAVAHGA TGKGNDQVRF EYSIKALAPQ LEIIAPWRTW DIKSRQEAIV YAKAHGIEVP VTPKAPYSRD HNIWYISHEG GVLEDPSQEM PDDVLLMTAP VSQTPDEEEV VVLDFKKGVP VALNGQELSP VDLLNSLNQK AGQHGIGVAD IVENRLVGMK IRGIYEAPAA AVLYKAHKLL ESLCLTRSTL HLKQSLQQTY ANLVYEGRWF SQTKQALDAF IDVTQQHVTG CVKLKLFKGN IIPAGMHSPY SLHHPELATF EEDNVYNQKD AEGFINLFSL SAKIYSQVHQ EGNYD
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: lpc:LPC_2852

Protein Families
Argininosuccinate synthase family, Type 1 subfamily
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

How does argG expression relate to the ArgR regulatory system in L. pneumophila?

The arginine repressor (ArgR) in L. pneumophila functions as a direct sensor of L-arginine availability, repressing transcription of its target genes when arginine biosynthesis is not required . Research has demonstrated that ArgR monomers oligomerize to form homohexamers that are allosterically activated by bound L-arginine to form a transcriptional repressor . This repressor binds to conserved DNA operator sites, controlling the expression of genes in the arginine biosynthetic pathway, including argG. During intracellular growth, when arginine may be limited within the Legionella-containing vacuole (LCV), ArgR-regulated genes including argG are typically derepressed, allowing for arginine synthesis from available precursors .

Why is studying recombinant argG important for understanding L. pneumophila pathogenesis?

Studying recombinant argG provides insights into how L. pneumophila adapts metabolically during infection. Since L. pneumophila is an arginine auxotroph but maintains the ability to synthesize arginine from downstream intermediates, understanding the regulation and activity of argG may reveal how the bacterium satisfies its nutritional requirements within host cells. The ArgR regulatory system, which likely controls argG expression, has been shown to be required for maximal intracellular growth in the protozoan host Acanthamoeba castellanii . This suggests that arginine metabolism, including argG function, is linked to virulence. Additionally, recombinant argG studies allow researchers to investigate potential drug targets, as disrupting arginine biosynthesis could limit bacterial replication during infection.

What expression systems are optimal for producing recombinant L. pneumophila argG?

For successful expression of recombinant L. pneumophila argG, several expression systems can be considered based on research requirements:

Expression SystemAdvantagesLimitationsOptimization Strategies
E. coli BL21(DE3)High yield, cost-effective, rapid growthPossible improper folding of non-bacterial proteinsUse lower induction temperatures (16-25°C), co-express chaperones
E. coli Arctic ExpressBetter folding at low temperaturesSlower growth, lower yieldsExtend expression time, optimize media composition
Baculovirus-insect cellBetter post-translational modificationsMore complex, higher costOptimize MOI, harvest timing
Cell-free systemsAvoids toxicity issues, rapidLower yield, higher costSupplement with cofactors, optimize reaction conditions

When expressing L. pneumophila argG, codon optimization is often necessary due to codon usage differences. The pET vector series (particularly pET28a with an N-terminal His-tag) has proven effective for many bacterial enzymes. Expression should be initiated at OD600 of 0.6-0.8 with 0.1-0.5 mM IPTG, and performed at 18-25°C overnight to enhance proper folding. Buffer optimization including 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 300 mM NaCl, and 10% glycerol often improves stability during purification.

What purification strategies yield the highest activity for recombinant L. pneumophila argG?

Purification of recombinant L. pneumophila argG requires a strategic approach to maintain enzyme activity:

  • Initial capture: Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) using Ni-NTA resin with His-tagged argG, eluting with an imidazole gradient (50-250 mM).

  • Intermediate purification: Ion exchange chromatography (typically Q Sepharose) to separate based on charge differences.

  • Polishing step: Size exclusion chromatography using Superdex 200 to obtain homogeneous protein and remove aggregates.

Critical buffer considerations include:

  • Maintaining pH between 7.5-8.0 (optimal for argG stability)

  • Including 1-5 mM DTT or 2-ME to protect cysteine residues

  • Adding 10% glycerol to prevent aggregation

  • Including 0.5-1 mM EDTA to chelate metal ions that might promote oxidation

  • Considering the addition of arginine (50-100 mM) in storage buffers to enhance stability

Protein quality should be assessed using SDS-PAGE, western blotting, dynamic light scattering for aggregation analysis, and thermal shift assays to evaluate buffer-dependent stability. Activity should be verified using a coupled enzyme assay that monitors the conversion of citrulline and aspartate to argininosuccinate.

How can crystal structures of L. pneumophila argG be obtained for structure-based drug design?

Obtaining crystal structures of L. pneumophila argG requires a systematic approach:

  • Protein preparation: Ultra-pure (>95%) monodisperse protein is essential, often requiring additional chromatography steps beyond standard purification. Protein should be concentrated to 5-15 mg/mL.

  • Crystallization screening: Initial screening using commercial sparse matrix kits (Hampton Research, Molecular Dimensions) with 192-384 conditions, employing vapor diffusion methods (sitting or hanging drop).

  • Optimization strategies:

    • Fine-tuning precipitant concentration, pH, and temperature

    • Screening additives and detergents

    • Surface entropy reduction through site-directed mutagenesis of surface residues

    • Utilizing microseeding techniques

    • Co-crystallization with substrates, products, or inhibitors

  • Data collection: Synchrotron radiation sources typically provide the highest resolution data. Crystals must be appropriately cryoprotected to prevent ice formation.

  • Structure determination: Molecular replacement using homologous argG structures or experimental phasing methods if necessary.

  • Refinement and validation: Iterative model building and refinement using programs like PHENIX, REFMAC, or COOT, followed by validation with MolProbity.

While specific crystal structures of L. pneumophila argG have not been reported, researchers can leverage the recent advancements in 3D protein structure prediction methods that have been successfully applied to predict structures of numerous L. pneumophila effectors . These computational approaches can provide valuable structural insights when experimental structures are challenging to obtain.

What enzymatic assays are most effective for characterizing recombinant L. pneumophila argG activity?

Several complementary approaches can be used to characterize recombinant L. pneumophila argG activity:

  • Spectrophotometric coupled assay: The most common approach links argG activity to NADH oxidation through auxiliary enzymes. This assay monitors the decrease in absorbance at 340 nm as NADH is oxidized to NAD+, which correlates with argininosuccinate production.

  • HPLC-based assay: Direct quantification of argininosuccinate formation using reverse-phase or ion-exchange HPLC, often with UV detection at 210-220 nm.

  • Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC): Measures the heat released during catalysis, providing thermodynamic parameters along with kinetic constants.

  • Mass spectrometry: LC-MS/MS can directly quantify substrate depletion and product formation with high sensitivity.

For kinetic characterization, researchers should determine:

  • Km values for both citrulline and aspartate

  • kcat and catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km)

  • pH and temperature optima

  • Effects of divalent cations (Mg2+, Mn2+)

  • ATP requirements

  • Potential allosteric regulators

ParameterTypical RangeOptimal Conditions
pH optimum7.5-8.550 mM Tris-HCl
Temperature optimum30-37°CControlled water bath
Km (citrulline)0.1-0.5 mMVary [citrulline] at fixed [aspartate]
Km (aspartate)0.5-2.0 mMVary [aspartate] at fixed [citrulline]
Mg2+ requirement1-10 mMUsually added as MgCl2
ATP requirement1-5 mMAdded in excess

How does the activity of recombinant L. pneumophila argG compare with homologs from other bacterial species?

Comparative analysis of L. pneumophila argG with homologs from other bacterial species provides evolutionary and functional insights:

Argininosuccinate synthases typically show conserved catalytic mechanisms across species, but with variations in substrate affinity, catalytic efficiency, and regulatory properties that reflect ecological adaptations. L. pneumophila, as an intracellular pathogen with arginine auxotrophy, likely possesses an argG with distinctive properties compared to free-living bacteria.

Key comparative parameters to evaluate include:

  • Substrate specificity and binding affinity

  • Catalytic efficiency under varying pH and temperature conditions

  • Susceptibility to inhibitors

  • Allosteric regulation mechanisms

  • Protein stability and half-life

When comparing argG from different species, researchers should consider their ecological niches. For example, intracellular pathogens might have evolved enzymes optimized for the host cell environment, while enzymes from extremophiles might show distinctive temperature or pH optima. Additionally, comparing argG sequences and structures across species can identify conserved catalytic residues versus variable regions that might influence species-specific properties or interaction partners.

How does argG function change during L. pneumophila infection of host cells?

During infection, L. pneumophila creates a specialized replication niche called the Legionella-containing vacuole (LCV). The function of argG likely changes in response to this unique intracellular environment:

  • Expression regulation: Studies of the ArgR regulon have demonstrated that ArgR-regulated genes, which likely include argG, are derepressed during intracellular growth . This suggests increased expression of argG when L. pneumophila resides within host cells.

  • Nutrient availability adaptation: Within the LCV, the availability of arginine or its precursors may differ from laboratory culture conditions. The bacterium may utilize argG to synthesize arginine from available citrulline and aspartate when free arginine is limited.

  • Integration with host metabolism: L. pneumophila extensively modifies host metabolic pathways during infection, including targeting mitochondrial functions . The bacterium may coordinate argG activity with these broader metabolic manipulations to optimize nutrient acquisition.

  • Response to stress conditions: The intracellular environment presents various stresses, including potential oxidative stress. The activity and stability of argG may be modified to function under these conditions.

  • Potential moonlighting functions: Some metabolic enzymes in pathogens have evolved secondary "moonlighting" functions during infection. While speculative, argG might potentially have roles beyond its canonical metabolic function.

Methodologically, studying these changes requires techniques for analyzing protein function in situ during infection, such as fluorescent activity-based probes, proximity labeling approaches, or selective extraction of bacterial proteins from infected cells followed by activity assays.

What structural features of L. pneumophila argG could be exploited for selective inhibitor design?

Designing selective inhibitors for L. pneumophila argG requires understanding its structural features and identifying differences from human argininosuccinate synthase:

Structural analysis approaches should include:

  • Homology modeling based on related argG structures

  • Molecular dynamics simulations to identify flexible regions and transient pockets

  • Fragment-based screening against recombinant protein

  • Virtual screening targeting identified unique features

  • Structure-activity relationship studies of lead compounds

While no specific inhibitors of L. pneumophila argG have been reported in the literature, the recent advances in 3D protein structure prediction tools that have been successfully applied to hundreds of L. pneumophila proteins could facilitate computational drug design targeting this enzyme.

How can high-throughput screening approaches be optimized for identifying L. pneumophila argG inhibitors?

Optimizing high-throughput screening (HTS) for L. pneumophila argG inhibitors requires careful assay development and screening strategy:

  • Assay development considerations:

    • Select an assay format with high signal-to-background ratio

    • Miniaturize to 384- or 1536-well format for efficiency

    • Ensure compatibility with automated liquid handling

    • Develop counterscreens to eliminate false positives

    • Include controls for assessing assay robustness (Z' factor calculation)

  • Primary screening approaches:

    • Spectrophotometric coupled enzyme assay monitoring NADH oxidation (340 nm)

    • Fluorescence-based assays using substrate or product analogs

    • Thermal shift assays (differential scanning fluorimetry) for detecting ligand binding

    • Surface plasmon resonance for direct binding assessment

  • Hit validation cascade:

    • Dose-response relationships to establish potency

    • Mechanism of inhibition studies (competitive, noncompetitive, uncompetitive)

    • Selectivity profiling against human argininosuccinate synthase

    • Assessment of activity in bacterial growth assays

    • Evaluation in cell infection models

  • Compound library considerations:

    • Focus on privileged scaffolds known to target ATP-utilizing enzymes

    • Include natural product collections

    • Consider fragment libraries for detecting weak but efficient binders

    • Diversity-oriented synthetic libraries

  • Data analysis strategies:

    • Machine learning approaches to identify structure-activity relationships

    • Clustering of active compounds by chemical similarity

    • Pharmacophore modeling based on confirmed hits

The optimization of HTS approaches should include careful validation of positive and negative controls, DMSO tolerance testing, and assessment of the minimum significant inhibition threshold based on assay variability.

What cellular models best represent the in vivo environment for validating argG inhibitors?

Selecting appropriate cellular models for validating argG inhibitors requires consideration of the natural infection cycle of L. pneumophila:

  • Protozoan host models:

    • Acanthamoeba castellanii: A natural host of L. pneumophila in the environment

    • Dictyostelium discoideum: A genetically tractable amoeba model

    • Tetrahymena thermophila: Allows for study of longer-term infection dynamics

  • Mammalian cell models:

    • THP-1 (human monocytic cell line): Can be differentiated into macrophage-like cells

    • U937 cells: Another human monocytic line used for Legionella studies

    • Primary human alveolar macrophages: Most physiologically relevant but limited availability

    • Bone marrow-derived macrophages from mice: Widely used for mechanistic studies

  • Complex tissue models:

    • Human lung epithelial/macrophage co-culture systems

    • Lung-on-a-chip microfluidic devices

    • Ex vivo lung tissue explants

  • Animal models:

    • Guinea pigs: Most susceptible to Legionella infection with pathology similar to humans

    • A/J mice: Susceptible mouse strain useful for preliminary in vivo validation

    • Zebrafish larvae: Emerging model for studying innate immune responses to infection

  • Validation approaches in these models:

    • Bacterial burden quantification (CFU counts, qPCR)

    • Microscopy to assess intracellular replication

    • Host cell viability assessment

    • Cytokine profiling to evaluate inflammatory responses

    • Transcriptomics to assess bacterial and host responses

When testing argG inhibitors, researchers should consider:

  • Compound stability in biological media

  • Cell penetration abilities

  • Potential host cell toxicity

  • Effects on host metabolism

  • Activity under the specific conditions of the LCV microenvironment

The most informative validation would combine multiple model systems, starting with simpler cellular models and progressing to more complex systems as promising candidates are identified.

How can protein engineering be applied to enhance recombinant L. pneumophila argG for biotechnological applications?

Protein engineering of recombinant L. pneumophila argG can enhance its properties for various biotechnological applications:

  • Stability engineering approaches:

    • Consensus-based design: Analyzing homologous sequences to identify stabilizing mutations

    • Disulfide bond introduction: Strategic placement of cysteine pairs to form stabilizing bridges

    • Surface charge optimization: Modifying surface residues to enhance solubility

    • Rigidification of flexible loops: Reducing entropy by stabilizing mobile regions

  • Catalytic efficiency enhancement:

    • Active site redesign based on transition state theory

    • Substrate tunnel optimization for improved substrate channeling

    • Introduction of catalytic residues from homologs with higher activity

    • Directed evolution using error-prone PCR and screening for improved variants

  • Substrate specificity modification:

    • Rational design based on molecular docking studies

    • Semi-rational approaches targeting binding pocket residues

    • Domain swapping with related enzymes having desired specificity

    • Combinatorial mutagenesis of substrate-binding regions

  • Immobilization optimization:

    • Introduction of specific tags or binding motifs for oriented immobilization

    • Surface residue modification to enhance attachment to supports

    • Engineering for stability in immobilized formats

  • Potential biotechnological applications:

    • Biosensors for arginine or citrulline detection

    • Biocatalytic production of argininosuccinate for pharmaceutical applications

    • Model system for studying metabolic pathway engineering

    • Educational tool for enzyme kinetics and protein engineering concepts

When engineering L. pneumophila argG, researchers should employ iterative cycles of design, construction, and testing, with comprehensive characterization of each variant's biochemical properties, stability, and kinetic parameters.

How can advanced structural biology techniques elucidate the conformational dynamics of argG during catalysis?

Understanding the conformational dynamics of argG during catalysis requires integrating multiple advanced structural biology techniques:

  • X-ray crystallography with substrate analogs and reaction intermediates:

    • Crystallizing enzyme with non-hydrolyzable ATP analogs

    • Trapping reaction intermediates using site-directed mutants

    • Time-resolved crystallography using rapid mixing and freezing

  • Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM):

    • Single-particle analysis for capturing different conformational states

    • Time-resolved cryo-EM for visualizing reaction trajectory

    • Correlation with functional data to map energy landscape

  • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy:

    • Chemical shift perturbation to map ligand binding sites

    • Relaxation dispersion experiments to detect millisecond timescale motions

    • Residual dipolar coupling for orientation information

    • TROSY experiments for large protein dynamics

  • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS):

    • Mapping regions of altered solvent accessibility during catalysis

    • Detecting allosteric communication networks

    • Identifying flexible regions critical for function

  • Single-molecule techniques:

    • FRET studies to measure domain movements

    • Optical tweezers to apply force and measure mechanical properties

    • Single-molecule fluorescence to detect conformational heterogeneity

  • Molecular dynamics simulations:

    • All-atom simulations to predict conformational changes

    • Enhanced sampling methods to access longer timescales

    • QM/MM simulations for reaction mechanism details

Integration of these techniques provides a comprehensive understanding of argG dynamics, from atomic-level catalytic events to larger domain movements that orchestrate the multistep reaction. These insights can inform inhibitor design by identifying transient states or cryptic binding sites not visible in static structures.

What are the challenges in developing genetic systems to study argG function in L. pneumophila?

Developing genetic systems to study argG function in L. pneumophila presents several technical challenges:

  • Essential gene considerations:

    • If argG is essential (likely given L. pneumophila's arginine auxotrophy), traditional knockout approaches may not be viable

    • Conditional expression systems (inducible/repressible promoters) may be necessary

    • Depletion strategies using protein degradation tags provide an alternative

  • Genetic manipulation challenges:

    • Natural competence in L. pneumophila is strain-dependent and often limited

    • Electroporation efficiency can be variable

    • Conjugation often requires optimization for specific strains

    • Homologous recombination efficiency may be lower than in model organisms

  • Selection marker considerations:

    • Limited number of validated selection markers for L. pneumophila

    • Need for compatible markers when performing multiple genetic manipulations

    • Potential for marker recycling systems using site-specific recombinases

  • Complementation approaches:

    • Ensuring physiological expression levels to avoid artifacts

    • Development of single-copy integration systems at neutral chromosomal sites

    • Creating temperature-sensitive alleles for conditional function studies

  • Intracellular expression analysis:

    • Challenges in measuring protein levels during intracellular growth

    • Need for sensitive reporter systems that function within host cells

    • Developing methods to isolate bacteria from host cells with minimal perturbation

  • Recommended genetic tools:

    • CRISPR-Cas9 systems adapted for L. pneumophila

    • Allelic exchange vectors with counter-selection markers

    • Tn7-based site-specific integration systems

    • Fluorescent protein fusions validated for function in L. pneumophila

    • Dual fluorescence transcriptional reporter systems for monitoring gene expression

Successful genetic analysis of argG function would ideally combine multiple approaches, including site-directed mutagenesis of key residues, regulated expression systems, and functional complementation with homologs from other species. These studies would need to be conducted both in laboratory media and during infection of relevant host cells to fully understand argG's role in L. pneumophila pathogenesis.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.