A key rRNA-binding protein. Essential for 30S and 50S ribosomal subunit association to form the 70S ribosome, as well as for tRNA binding and peptide bond formation. While its peptidyltransferase activity remains somewhat debated, it exhibits multiple interactions with the 16S rRNA within the 70S ribosome.
KEGG: lpn:lpg0332
STRING: 272624.lpg0332
For optimal storage stability, consider the form of the protein and appropriate temperature conditions. The liquid form maintains stability for approximately 6 months when stored at -20°C/-80°C, while the lyophilized form extends shelf life to approximately 12 months at the same temperature range . When reconstituting the protein, first centrifuge the vial briefly to bring contents to the bottom. Then reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL . For long-term storage, add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (standard preparations typically use 50%) and create working aliquots to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles . For short-term experimental use, working aliquots can be stored at 4°C for up to one week, but repeated freezing and thawing should be avoided as this may compromise protein integrity .
L2 protein plays a critical role in ribosomal assembly, specifically in the association of ribosomal subunits. In vitro reconstitution studies demonstrate that L2 is essential for the formation of key reconstitution intermediates during 50S subunit assembly . When L2 is absent, there is a significant disruption in the formation of reconstitution intermediates RI 50*(1) and RI 50(2), indicating its importance in the structural progression of ribosome assembly . This protein appears to be crucial for stabilizing the tertiary structure of rRNA within the large subunit. Reconstitution experiments show that subunits containing mutated versions of L2 (such as D83N and S177A) demonstrate reduced L2 occupation (67% and 49% respectively), which directly impacts functional capacity in translation assays . These findings support the classification of L2 as one of the early assembly proteins that create nucleation points for subsequent ribosomal assembly steps.
Site-directed mutagenesis provides a powerful approach for investigating structure-function relationships in rplB. Based on current research methodologies, researchers should begin by identifying conserved residues across species or domains likely to be functionally significant. Key residues identified in previous studies include D83, S177, D228, and H229 . To implement this approach, design primers for PCR-based mutagenesis targeting these specific amino acid residues. After mutagenesis and confirmation by sequencing, express and purify the mutant proteins using either Ni-NTA affinity chromatography (for His-tagged constructs) or a combination of streptomycin sulfate precipitation and RP-HPLC .
The functional impact of mutations can be assessed through in vitro reconstitution assays where wild-type L2 is replaced with the mutagenized variant. This process involves isolating proteins from the 50S subunit (TP50), removing wild-type L2 through ion-exchange chromatography or RP-HPLC, and then reconstituting the particles with mutagenized L2 . Analysis of the reconstituted particles should include:
Assessment of reconstitution efficiency through sucrose-density centrifugation
Verification of L2 incorporation via SDS-PAGE or two-dimensional gel electrophoresis
Functional testing in translation assays to determine the impact on protein synthesis activity
Comparative analysis between wild-type and mutant L2-containing particles can reveal specific amino acids essential for subunit association, peptidyl transferase activity, or interactions with translation factors .
While rplB's primary function relates to ribosomal assembly, emerging research suggests potential connections to pathogenesis and antimicrobial resistance mechanisms in L. pneumophila. When investigating this relationship, researchers should consider the following methodological approaches:
First, examine correlation patterns between rplB sequence variations and clinical isolates to determine if specific variants are associated with enhanced virulence. Population genomic studies of L. pneumophila have successfully identified virulence factors by comparing isolates from clinical and environmental sources . Though current data shows that the lag-1 gene (encoding an O-acetyltransferase for lipopolysaccharide modification) is most strongly associated with clinical isolates , systematic analysis of rplB variations across isolates may reveal previously unrecognized patterns.
Second, investigate potential interactions between rplB and antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. Recent studies examining antimicrobial susceptibility of 1464 environmental L. pneumophila isolates have identified specific resistance mechanisms, such as the lpeAB efflux pump conferring azithromycin resistance . While direct connections between rplB and these mechanisms haven't been established, ribosomal proteins are known targets for antibiotics, making them potentially relevant to resistance development.
For experimental implementation, researchers should:
Compare rplB sequences across clinical and environmental isolates
Generate knockout or modified rplB strains to test virulence in cellular and animal models
Assess antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of strains with rplB variations
Investigate potential interactions between rplB and known resistance determinants such as efflux pumps
Comparative analysis of rplB across Legionella species and strains provides insights into evolutionary conservation and functional adaptations. Implementation of this research requires bioinformatic and experimental approaches:
Begin with sequence alignment analysis of rplB proteins from various Legionella species and strains, identifying conserved domains and variable regions. Construct phylogenetic trees based on these alignments to visualize evolutionary relationships. For a comprehensive analysis, extract rplB sequences from genomic databases of diverse Legionella isolates, including both clinical and environmental sources.
Next, employ structural modeling techniques to predict three-dimensional conformations and compare structural features across variants. Homology modeling using resolved structures of L2 proteins from model organisms as templates can reveal structure-function relationships. Pay particular attention to regions involved in rRNA binding and subunit association.
Experimentally verify functional differences by expressing recombinant rplB variants from different species/strains and conducting comparative functional assays:
In vitro reconstitution with homologous or heterologous ribosomal components
Translation efficiency measurements using reporter systems
Binding affinity assays with partner molecules (rRNA, other ribosomal proteins)
Current research with L. pneumophila has demonstrated that genomic diversity exists across the species, with implications for virulence and environmental adaptation . Expanding this approach to focus specifically on rplB could reveal whether this ribosomal protein contributes to species- or strain-specific biological properties.
For high-quality recombinant L. pneumophila rplB production suitable for structural studies, researchers should consider the following methodological workflow:
Expression System Selection:
The documented approach uses yeast as the expression source for recombinant L. pneumophila rplB , but researchers may also consider E. coli-based systems for potentially higher yields. For bacterial expression, BL21(DE3) or Rosetta strains often provide efficient expression of heterologous proteins. Vector selection should include appropriate tags to facilitate purification – the His-tag approach has been successfully employed for L2 protein purification .
Expression Optimization:
Culture conditions significantly impact protein quality and yield. Test multiple induction conditions varying:
Temperature (16°C, 25°C, 37°C)
Inducer concentration (0.1-1.0 mM IPTG for bacterial systems)
Induction duration (4-24 hours)
Media composition (standard LB vs. enriched media)
Purification Strategy:
Two effective purification approaches have been documented:
Affinity chromatography using Ni-NTA matrix for His-tagged constructs, followed by size-exclusion chromatography to remove aggregates and ensure monodispersity .
Combination of streptomycin sulfate precipitation and reverse-phase HPLC, followed by gel filtration .
For structural studies, additional purification steps may be necessary to achieve >95% purity. Consider ion-exchange chromatography as a polishing step and analyze final purity by SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometry.
Buffer Optimization for Stability:
Test multiple buffer conditions to identify optimal stability for structural studies:
pH range (pH 6.5-8.0)
Salt concentration (100-500 mM NaCl)
Addition of stabilizing agents (glycerol 5-10%)
Reducing agents (DTT or β-mercaptoethanol)
Monitor protein stability using dynamic light scattering or thermal shift assays to identify conditions that maximize monodispersity and thermal stability, which are critical prerequisites for successful structural studies.
Reconstitution of 50S ribosomal particles with recombinant or modified rplB provides a powerful system for investigating ribosomal function. Follow this methodological framework for effective reconstitution:
Preparation of Components:
L2-depleted ribosomal proteins (TP50-L2): Isolate total proteins from native 50S subunits and remove endogenous L2 using either ion-exchange chromatography and gel filtration or RP-HPLC and gel filtration methods . Verify complete L2 removal using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis.
Ribosomal RNA: Extract total rRNA from 70S ribosomes using phenol-chloroform extraction followed by ethanol precipitation. Ensure RNA integrity by agarose gel electrophoresis.
Recombinant or modified L2 protein: Purify to >85% homogeneity using techniques described in section 3.1.
Reconstitution Protocol:
Implementation of a two-step incubation process has been shown effective:
First incubation: Mix TP50-L2, rRNA, and recombinant L2 in reconstitution buffer (typically containing Mg²⁺, NH₄Cl, Tris-HCl at appropriate concentrations) and incubate at 44°C for 20 minutes to form early intermediates.
Second incubation: Increase Mg²⁺ concentration and continue incubation at 50°C for 90 minutes to facilitate formation of mature 50S particles .
Monitor reconstitution progress by analyzing aliquots through sucrose gradient centrifugation, which allows visualization of the formation of reconstitution intermediates RI 50(1), RI 50*(1), and RI 50(2) .
Purification and Verification:
Purify reconstituted 50S particles from non-reconstituted material by sucrose-density centrifugation . Verify L2 incorporation using SDS-PAGE or two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Quantitative assessment of L2 occupation is essential, as variations in incorporation efficiency (potentially as low as 49% with certain mutations) directly impact functional capacity .
Functional Testing:
Assess reconstituted particles through:
Subunit association assays with 30S subunits
In vitro translation assays using reporter mRNAs
Peptidyl transferase activity measurements
Antibiotic binding studies
This reconstitution system allows systematic investigation of structure-function relationships by comparing particles containing wild-type versus modified L2 variants.
Investigating potential connections between rplB and L. pneumophila pathogenicity requires a multi-faceted analytical approach:
Comparative Genomics Analysis:
Begin with population genomic analysis comparing rplB sequences from clinical versus environmental isolates, similar to approaches that successfully identified lag-1 as a pathogenicity determinant . Implement this through:
Whole-genome sequencing of diverse isolate collections
Comparative analysis of rplB sequences and surrounding genomic regions
Statistical association testing between specific rplB variants and clinical source
Gene Knockout and Complementation Studies:
Generate rplB knockout strains using allelic exchange techniques and assess impact on virulence. Due to the essential nature of rplB, consider conditional knockdowns or specific domain deletions rather than complete gene removal. Follow with complementation using various rplB alleles to determine which specific features impact virulence.
In vitro Infection Models:
Assess pathogenicity using appropriate infection models:
Amoeba infection models (natural hosts for L. pneumophila)
Macrophage infection assays measuring bacterial replication and cell death
Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis:
Investigate potential interactions between rplB and known virulence factors or host components using:
Co-immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Bacterial two-hybrid systems
Proximity labeling approaches
In vivo Animal Models:
Validate findings in mouse pulmonary legionellosis models, measuring:
Bacterial burden in lungs
Inflammatory responses
Survival rates
A relevant analytical framework would mirror studies that identified lag-1 as conferring resistance to complement-mediated killing and promoting survival in mouse models . While current evidence doesn't specifically link rplB to pathogenicity mechanisms, its essential role in protein synthesis makes it a potential contributor to virulence through effects on expression of true virulence factors.
Integration of structural and functional data provides comprehensive insights into rplB's role in ribosomal assembly. Implement this research strategy through the following methodological framework:
Structural Analysis Approaches:
X-ray Crystallography: Generate crystals of purified L. pneumophila rplB alone or in complex with interacting rRNA fragments. Resolve structure at high resolution to identify key structural features.
Cryo-electron Microscopy: Apply to fully or partially reconstituted 50S particles containing wild-type or modified rplB. This approach can reveal rplB's position and conformation within the assembled ribosome.
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR): Use for analyzing dynamics of specific domains or interactions with binding partners.
Computational Modeling: Apply homology modeling based on existing ribosomal structures to predict L. pneumophila rplB structure and interactions.
Functional Analysis Methods:
Reconstitution Intermediate Analysis: Monitor formation of reconstitution intermediates (RI 50(1), RI 50*(1), RI 50(2)) in the presence of various rplB mutants using sucrose gradient centrifugation .
Structure-guided Mutagenesis: Target specific residues identified from structural studies for mutagenesis, then assess impacts on:
Subunit association
Translation efficiency
Peptidyl transferase activity
RNA-protein Interaction Assays: Use techniques like electrophoretic mobility shift assays or surface plasmon resonance to measure binding affinities between rplB variants and rRNA fragments.
Data Integration Framework:
Create a correlation matrix linking structural features to functional outcomes. For example:
| rplB Variant | Structural Change | Reconstitution Efficiency | Translation Activity | Subunit Association |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild-type | Reference | 100% | 100% | Normal |
| D83N | [Structural data] | 67% | [Functional data] | [Association data] |
| S177A | [Structural data] | 49% | [Functional data] | [Association data] |
| D228N | [Structural data] | [Reconstitution data] | [Functional data] | [Association data] |
| H229A | [Structural data] | [Reconstitution data] | [Functional data] | [Association data] |
This integration allows identification of structure-function relationships and critical domains necessary for rplB's role in ribosomal assembly. Current research has established that mutations at positions D83N and S177A affect L2 incorporation into reconstituted particles , but comprehensive integration with structural data would provide deeper mechanistic understanding.
Differentiating rplB's specific contributions from other ribosomal components requires specialized experimental approaches that isolate its functions. Implement this research through the following methodological framework:
Selective Ribosomal Protein Replacement:
Develop a system where only rplB is replaced while maintaining all other ribosomal components. This can be achieved through:
L2-depleted reconstitution systems where only L2 is selectively removed and replaced
In vivo systems using conditional expression of modified rplB variants
Chimeric Protein Analysis:
Create chimeric proteins where domains of L. pneumophila rplB are swapped with corresponding regions from other bacterial species. This approach can identify L. pneumophila-specific functions and domains through analysis of:
Growth phenotypes
Antibiotic sensitivities
Translational efficiencies of specific mRNAs
Ribosome Profiling:
Apply ribosome profiling to wild-type and rplB-modified strains to identify specific mRNAs whose translation is differentially affected. This would reveal whether rplB impacts general translation or affects specific subsets of transcripts (potentially including virulence factors). Implementation involves:
Harvesting bacteria under various conditions
Isolating ribosome-protected fragments
Deep sequencing and bioinformatic analysis to identify differentially translated mRNAs
Specific Binding Partner Identification:
Beyond its structural role in ribosomes, rplB may have specific interaction partners unique from other ribosomal proteins:
Affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry
Bacterial two-hybrid screening
Protein microarray analysis
Comparative Multi-omics Analysis:
Implement multi-omics approaches comparing strains with wild-type versus modified rplB:
Transcriptomics to identify genes differentially expressed
Proteomics to determine changes in protein abundance
Metabolomics to identify altered metabolic pathways
These approaches would help distinguish phenotypes specifically attributable to rplB from general effects on translation. In prior L. pneumophila research, similar differential approaches successfully identified lag-1 as specifically contributing to complement resistance , demonstrating the utility of such strategies for isolating gene-specific functions.
Future research on L. pneumophila rplB should prioritize several interconnected directions to advance our understanding of its roles in both ribosomal function and potential contributions to pathogenesis. The most promising research avenues include:
Comprehensive Structure-Function Analysis: Determine high-resolution structures of L. pneumophila rplB alone and within the ribosomal context, coupled with systematic mutagenesis to map functional domains. This could reveal unique structural features that differentiate it from non-pathogenic bacterial homologs.
Specialized Translation Investigation: Explore whether rplB contributes to specialized translation of virulence-associated mRNAs, potentially through ribosome heterogeneity or selective translation mechanisms. Ribosome profiling under infection-relevant conditions could identify specifically regulated transcripts.
Host-Pathogen Interaction Studies: Investigate potential moonlighting functions of rplB beyond its canonical ribosomal role, particularly any interactions with host cell components during infection. Similar dual-function capabilities have been discovered for other ribosomal proteins in various bacterial species.
Antimicrobial Resistance Connections: Further explore relationships between rplB variations and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, particularly given that ribosomal proteins are targets for several antibiotic classes. Understanding this connection could inform therapeutic strategies for Legionnaires' disease.
Population Genomics Expansion: Extend current population genomic approaches to specifically examine rplB sequence variations across comprehensive collections of clinical and environmental isolates, potentially identifying variants associated with enhanced human pathogenicity.