Recombinant Lepidium virginicum Chloroplast envelope membrane protein (cemA)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your preferred format in order notes for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notification and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to settle the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and serves as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its inclusion.
Synonyms
cemA; ycf10; Chloroplast envelope membrane protein
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-229
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Lepidium virginicum (Virginia pepperweed)
Target Names
cemA
Target Protein Sequence
MAKKKAFIPFFDFTSIVFLPWLISLCCNKSLKTWITNWWNTRQCETFLNDIQEKSILEKF IQLEELFQLDEMIKEYPETDLQQFRLGIHKETIQFIKIHNEYRIHTILHFSTNLISFVIL SGYSFWGKEKLFILNSWVQEFLYNLSDTIKAFSILLLTDLCIGFHSPHGWELMIGYIYKD FGFAHYEQILSGLVSTFPVILDTIFKYWIFRYLNRVSPSLVVIYHAIND
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This protein may be involved in proton extrusion and indirectly facilitates efficient inorganic carbon uptake into chloroplasts.
Protein Families
Cema family
Subcellular Location
Plastid, chloroplast inner membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the chloroplast envelope membrane protein (cemA) in Lepidium virginicum?

The chloroplast envelope membrane protein (cemA), also known as ycf10, is a transmembrane protein encoded in the chloroplast genome of Lepidium virginicum (Virginia pepperweed). The protein consists of 229 amino acids with a sequence beginning with MAKKKAFIPFFDFTSIVFLPWLISLCCNKSLKTWITNWWNTRQCETFLNDIQEKSILEKF and continuing through a series of hydrophobic and hydrophilic regions . CemA plays roles in CO₂ uptake and possibly in maintaining membrane integrity within the chloroplast envelope. The protein's transmembrane domains suggest its structural importance in the chloroplast envelope architecture, where it may participate in facilitating molecular transport across the membrane.

How is the recombinant form of Lepidium virginicum cemA typically produced for research applications?

Recombinant Lepidium virginicum cemA is typically produced using in vitro E. coli expression systems, similar to other chloroplast membrane proteins . The production process involves:

  • Gene isolation from Lepidium virginicum chloroplast DNA

  • Cloning the cemA gene into an appropriate expression vector

  • Transformation of the construct into E. coli

  • Induction of protein expression under controlled conditions

  • Protein purification using affinity chromatography, typically through histidine tagging

  • Quality control assessment including SDS-PAGE and western blotting

  • Final formulation in Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol for stability

The resulting recombinant protein is often stored at -20°C for short-term use or -80°C for extended storage to maintain structural integrity and biological activity for research applications.

What are the recommended storage conditions for recombinant cemA protein to maintain stability?

For optimal stability of recombinant cemA protein, storage at -20°C is recommended for routine use, while -80°C is preferred for extended storage periods . The protein is typically supplied in a Tris-based buffer containing 50% glycerol, which serves as a cryoprotectant to prevent protein denaturation during freeze-thaw cycles . Researchers should note that repeated freezing and thawing significantly reduces protein viability and should be avoided. For ongoing experiments, working aliquots can be maintained at 4°C for up to one week . When preparing aliquots, it's advisable to use small volumes suitable for single experiments to minimize freeze-thaw cycles. The stability of the protein is also dependent on maintaining appropriate pH and avoiding exposure to proteases or oxidizing agents.

How can recombinant cemA be utilized in photosynthesis research and what specific protocols yield the most reliable results?

Recombinant cemA can serve as a powerful tool in photosynthesis research, particularly for investigating chloroplast membrane transport mechanisms and CO₂ uptake pathways. The most reliable research protocols involve:

  • Reconstitution studies: Incorporating purified recombinant cemA into artificial liposomes to study membrane transport properties, using techniques such as stopped-flow spectrophotometry to measure ion or metabolite flux rates.

  • Interaction analysis: Employing co-immunoprecipitation or pull-down assays with tagged recombinant cemA to identify binding partners within the chloroplast envelope complex.

  • Functional complementation: Using recombinant cemA in knockout mutant studies to confirm and characterize protein function through restoration of normal phenotypes.

Studies from related chloroplast envelope proteins demonstrate that controlled reconstitution into membrane mimetic systems yields the most reliable functional data . For example, research on water-soluble chlorophyll-binding proteins from Lepidium virginicum showed that spectroscopic techniques including absorption, emission, and hole-burned spectra provide valuable insights into protein-chlorophyll interactions . When designing such experiments, researchers should carefully consider detergent selection for protein solubilization, as this significantly impacts structural integrity and functional properties.

What are the current methodological challenges in studying cemA structure-function relationships and how can they be addressed?

Current methodological challenges in studying cemA structure-function relationships include:

  • Membrane protein crystallization difficulties: As a transmembrane protein, cemA presents challenges for traditional structural biology approaches. This can be addressed through:

    • Use of lipidic cubic phase crystallization techniques

    • Application of cryo-electron microscopy for structural determination

    • Computational modeling approaches based on homologous proteins

  • Functional assay limitations: The precise role of cemA in chloroplast membrane transport remains incompletely characterized. Researchers can overcome this by:

    • Developing isotope-labeled substrate transport assays

    • Creating fluorescent reporter systems linked to transport activity

    • Utilizing patch-clamp techniques on reconstituted membranes

  • Protein stability issues: The hydrophobic nature of cemA makes it prone to aggregation and misfolding. Strategies to address this include:

    • Optimization of detergent screening protocols

    • Use of amphipathic polymers as membrane mimetics

    • Engineering fusion constructs with stability-enhancing domains

Recent advances with similar chloroplast envelope proteins suggest that combining multiple approaches, particularly integrating computational predictions with experimental validation, offers the most comprehensive understanding of structure-function relationships.

How does the sequence and structure of Lepidium virginicum cemA compare to homologous proteins in other plant species?

The chloroplast envelope membrane protein (cemA) from Lepidium virginicum shows significant conservation among plant species, but with notable variations that may reflect adaptation to different physiological conditions. Comparative analysis reveals:

Sequence Conservation Patterns:

  • The core transmembrane domains show higher conservation than terminal regions

  • Key functional motifs, particularly the "VILDTIFKYWIFRYLNR" motif, are highly conserved across multiple species

  • The Lepidium virginicum cemA sequence (229 amino acids) is similar in length to other Brassicaceae family members

Structural Comparisons:

  • When compared to cemA from Pyropia yezoensis (278 amino acids), the Lepidium protein shows approximately 45% sequence identity in core functional regions

  • The hydrophobic transmembrane domains particularly the "PHGWELMIGYIYKD" region shows strong conservation across species

  • The predicted membrane topology (number and arrangement of transmembrane helices) is largely conserved

Functional Implications:

  • Variations in the N-terminal region may reflect species-specific regulatory mechanisms

  • Conservation of the "GFHSPHGW" motif suggests its importance in substrate recognition or binding

  • Species differences in the C-terminal domain may relate to interaction specificity with other chloroplast proteins

This evolutionary conservation pattern supports the critical role of cemA in chloroplast function across diverse plant lineages, while species-specific variations may contribute to environmental adaptation.

What are the recommended protocols for isolating chloroplast envelope membranes for cemA studies?

The isolation of high-purity chloroplast envelope membranes is crucial for meaningful cemA studies. Based on established protocols, the following methodology yields optimal results:

  • Plant Material Preparation:

    • Harvest approximately 200g of young Lepidium virginicum leaves

    • Precondition plants under controlled light/dark cycles for consistent chloroplast development

    • Perform harvesting in early morning hours to maximize membrane integrity

  • Chloroplast Isolation:

    • Homogenize leaf material in isolation buffer (330 mM sorbitol, 50 mM HEPES-KOH pH 7.5, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM MgCl₂)

    • Filter through nylon mesh (pore size 30-50 μm)

    • Pellet chloroplasts via centrifugation at 1,000g for 5 minutes at 4°C

    • Resuspend in resuspension buffer for intact chloroplast purification

  • Envelope Membrane Purification:

    • Lyse chloroplasts via osmotic shock in hypotonic buffer

    • Separate envelope membranes using sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation

    • Collect the yellowish band lacking visible chlorophyll contamination

    • Wash five times with 1M sodium carbonate to remove peripherally attached proteins

  • Quality Assessment:

    • Verify purity using immunoblotting against known envelope markers

    • Assess thylakoid contamination using chlorophyll measurements

    • Confirm protein integrity via SDS-PAGE analysis

This protocol typically yields approximately 5 μg of envelope membrane proteins from 200g of leaf material, sufficient for downstream proteomic or functional analyses . The sucrose gradient centrifugation step is particularly critical for obtaining high-purity envelope fractions with minimal thylakoid contamination.

How can researchers effectively design expression systems for producing functional recombinant cemA?

Designing expression systems for functional recombinant cemA requires careful consideration of several factors to overcome the challenges associated with membrane protein expression:

Expression Vector Selection:

  • Use vectors with tightly controlled inducible promoters (e.g., T7 or tac) to minimize toxicity

  • Incorporate fusion tags that enhance solubility (e.g., MBP, SUMO) or facilitate purification (e.g., His, FLAG)

  • Consider codon optimization based on the expression host to maximize translation efficiency

Host Strain Considerations:

  • E. coli C41(DE3) or C43(DE3) strains are preferable for membrane protein expression

  • For eukaryotic hosts, consider insect cell lines (Sf9, High Five) that better accommodate membrane proteins

  • Evaluate yeast systems (Pichia pastoris) for proteins requiring post-translational modifications

Expression Conditions Optimization:

  • Induction at lower temperatures (16-20°C) to slow expression and improve folding

  • Reduced inducer concentration (0.1-0.5 mM IPTG) to prevent inclusion body formation

  • Addition of specific lipids or detergents to culture media to stabilize nascent membrane proteins

Extraction and Purification Strategy:

  • Two-phase extraction with mild detergents (DDM, LMNG, or digitonin)

  • Implement two-step purification combining affinity chromatography with size exclusion

  • Include stabilizing agents (glycerol 10-25%) throughout purification process

This approach has been successfully employed for other chloroplast envelope proteins and can be adapted specifically for cemA from Lepidium virginicum. The key determinant of success is balancing expression yield with protein quality to ensure functional activity is maintained.

What analytical techniques are most effective for studying protein-protein interactions involving cemA?

Several complementary analytical techniques are particularly effective for elucidating protein-protein interactions involving cemA in chloroplast envelope membranes:

In vitro Techniques:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): Using antibodies against cemA or potential interaction partners to pull down protein complexes from solubilized chloroplast envelopes, followed by mass spectrometry identification

  • Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR): For quantitative measurement of binding kinetics between purified recombinant cemA and candidate interacting proteins

  • Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC): To determine thermodynamic parameters of cemA interactions, providing insights into binding stoichiometry and energetics

In vivo Approaches:

  • Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC): Expression of cemA and potential partners tagged with complementary fluorescent protein fragments in plant chloroplasts

  • FRET/FLIM Analysis: Using fluorescently-tagged proteins to measure energy transfer as an indicator of protein proximity in intact chloroplasts

  • Proximity-dependent Biotin Labeling (BioID): Fusion of a biotin ligase to cemA to biotinylate nearby proteins in the native environment

Emerging Technologies:

  • Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry (HDX-MS): To map interaction interfaces by detecting changes in protein dynamics upon complex formation

  • Cross-linking Mass Spectrometry (XL-MS): For identification of specific contact residues between cemA and its interaction partners in their native environment

  • Cryo-Electron Tomography: To visualize cemA-containing complexes within the native membrane environment at near-atomic resolution

Each technique offers distinct advantages, with cross-linking approaches being particularly valuable for capturing transient interactions in the dynamic chloroplast envelope environment. Combining multiple complementary methods provides the most comprehensive characterization of cemA interaction networks.

How does cemA contribute to chloroplast function and what experimental approaches best demonstrate its role?

The chloroplast envelope membrane protein cemA plays multiple crucial roles in chloroplast function, with evidence suggesting its involvement in:

  • CO₂ Uptake Facilitation: Acting as a component in the carbon concentrating mechanism by facilitating inorganic carbon transport across the chloroplast envelope.

  • pH Regulation: Contributing to the maintenance of optimal stromal pH for photosynthetic enzyme activity.

  • Membrane Integrity: Participating in the structural organization of the chloroplast envelope membrane system.

Most Effective Experimental Approaches:

ApproachMethodologyExpected OutcomesLimitations
Knockout/Knockdown StudiesCRISPR-Cas9 editing or antisense RNA to reduce cemA expressionAltered photosynthetic efficiency, growth inhibition under limiting CO₂Potential compensatory mechanisms
Complementation AssaysIntroduction of recombinant cemA into deficient plantsRestoration of wild-type phenotype confirms functionRequires careful expression control
Fluorescent Protein FusionC/N-terminal GFP tagging for localizationConfirmation of envelope localization patternMay interfere with protein function
Isotope Labeling¹⁴C-bicarbonate uptake measurementsQuantitative assessment of carbon uptake ratesComplex to distinguish direct vs. indirect effects
ProteomicsComparative analysis of wild-type vs. cemA-deficient chloroplastsIdentification of altered protein networksRequires sophisticated mass spectrometry

Research using similar approaches with other chloroplast envelope proteins has demonstrated that combining in vivo physiological studies with in vitro biochemical characterization provides the most comprehensive understanding of function . Particularly informative has been the correlation of structural data with physiological measurements under varying environmental conditions (CO₂ concentration, light intensity, temperature).

What are the most sensitive methods for detecting conformational changes in recombinant cemA under different experimental conditions?

Detecting conformational changes in recombinant cemA requires highly sensitive biophysical techniques capable of capturing subtle structural alterations in membrane proteins. The most effective methods include:

  • Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry (HDX-MS): This technique measures the rate of hydrogen-deuterium exchange in the protein backbone, revealing regions of structural flexibility and solvent accessibility. For cemA studies, time-resolved HDX-MS can detect conformational changes induced by pH shifts, substrate binding, or interaction with other proteins.

  • Site-Directed Spin Labeling EPR Spectroscopy: By introducing spin labels at specific residues throughout cemA, researchers can monitor local environment changes under various conditions. This approach is particularly valuable for mapping conformational dynamics in transmembrane regions that are challenging to study by other methods.

  • Single-Molecule FRET: By labeling specific domains of cemA with fluorophore pairs, researchers can detect distance changes between these regions during conformational transitions with nanometer precision. This technique is especially powerful for capturing transient conformational states.

  • Circular Dichroism (CD) Spectroscopy: Far-UV CD can monitor secondary structure content, while near-UV CD provides information about tertiary structure. For cemA, changes in CD spectra under different pH, temperature, or ligand conditions can reveal global conformational shifts.

  • Hole-Burning Spectroscopy: This specialized technique has proven valuable for related proteins from Lepidium virginicum, revealing electron exchange between protein and cofactors. For cemA, hole-burning spectroscopy can detect subtle electronic structure changes associated with functional states .

These approaches can be particularly informative when applied to reconstituted cemA in membrane mimetic systems that approximate the native chloroplast envelope environment. Combining multiple techniques provides a comprehensive view of conformational dynamics across different spatial and temporal scales.

How might recombinant cemA be utilized in biotechnological applications for enhancing photosynthesis?

Recombinant cemA offers several promising biotechnological applications for enhancing photosynthesis, particularly through genetic engineering approaches:

  • Engineering Enhanced Carbon Concentration Mechanisms:

    • Overexpression of optimized cemA variants could improve CO₂ uptake efficiency in crop plants

    • Co-expression with complementary transporters may create synthetic carbon-concentrating pathways

    • Fine-tuning cemA expression levels in response to ambient CO₂ could maximize photosynthetic efficiency under fluctuating conditions

  • Chloroplast Membrane Engineering:

    • Designer cemA proteins with modified transport properties could enhance metabolite flux across the envelope

    • Engineering cemA to interact with specific transporters may create novel metabolic channeling systems

    • Modifying cemA structure to influence membrane curvature could optimize chloroplast architecture for light capture

  • Stress Tolerance Enhancement:

    • Creating cemA variants with improved stability under temperature extremes

    • Engineering pH-sensing domains into cemA to maintain optimal stromal conditions during stress

    • Developing regulatory circuits that modulate cemA activity in response to environmental signals

  • Synthetic Biology Applications:

    • Using cemA as a scaffold for assembling novel protein complexes at the chloroplast envelope

    • Creating synthetic transporters based on cemA structure for introducing new metabolic capabilities

    • Designing cemA-based biosensors for monitoring chloroplast physiological states

These applications would build upon current understanding of cemA structure and function while addressing limitations in photosynthetic efficiency that constrain crop productivity . Preliminary work with related chloroplast envelope proteins suggests that even modest improvements in carbon uptake efficiency can substantially increase photosynthetic rates under limiting conditions.

What potential exists for using cemA in understanding plant adaptation to environmental stresses?

Chloroplast envelope membrane protein cemA offers significant potential for elucidating plant adaptation mechanisms to environmental stresses, particularly through its role in maintaining chloroplast homeostasis under adverse conditions:

  • Temperature Stress Adaptation:

    • Research indicates that chloroplast envelope proteins show differential abundance during cold acclimation, suggesting cemA may play a role in membrane fluidity adjustment

    • Quantitative proteomics approaches can reveal how cemA abundance and modifications change during heat or cold stress

    • Comparative studies across species adapted to different temperature regimes may uncover cemA structural adaptations that confer thermal tolerance

  • Drought Response Mechanisms:

    • CemA may contribute to maintaining chloroplast volume and osmotic balance during water limitation

    • Its potential role in CO₂ uptake becomes particularly relevant under drought conditions when stomatal conductance is reduced

    • Engineering studies could test whether modified cemA variants improve photosynthetic water-use efficiency

  • Light Stress Management:

    • Investigation of cemA's interaction with photoprotective mechanisms during high light exposure

    • Analysis of potential roles in adapting electron transport rates to fluctuating light conditions

    • Correlation of cemA dynamics with reactive oxygen species management systems

  • CO₂ Availability Responses:

    • CemA may be particularly important in carbon concentration mechanisms under limiting CO₂

    • Evolutionary analysis across C3, C4, and CAM plants could reveal adaptive modifications

    • Experimental manipulation of cemA could test its contribution to photosynthetic efficiency under varying CO₂ levels

Research approaches would benefit from combining physiological measurements with molecular analyses across diverse plant species and ecotypes. The identification of natural cemA variants adapted to extreme environments could provide valuable genetic resources for crop improvement programs targeting stress resilience .

What emerging technologies will advance our understanding of cemA protein-metabolite interactions?

Several cutting-edge technologies are poised to revolutionize our understanding of cemA protein-metabolite interactions in the chloroplast envelope:

  • Cryo-Electron Microscopy Advances:

    • Single-particle analysis can now achieve near-atomic resolution of membrane protein complexes

    • Advances in sample preparation allow visualization of proteins in native membrane environments

    • Time-resolved cryo-EM is emerging for capturing different conformational states during transport cycles

  • Native Mass Spectrometry:

    • Developments in membrane protein ionization techniques enable direct analysis of intact cemA complexes

    • Identification of non-covalently bound metabolites and cofactors in native state

    • Capturing dynamic changes in cemA-metabolite interactions under varying conditions

  • Advanced Labeling Approaches:

    • Genetically encoded biosensors can report real-time metabolite interactions in vivo

    • Click chemistry with metabolite analogs allows tracking of binding events with spatial precision

    • Photoaffinity labeling combined with mass spectrometry for mapping exact binding sites

  • Computational Advances:

    • Molecular dynamics simulations of cemA within membrane environments at microsecond timescales

    • Machine learning approaches for predicting metabolite binding sites and affinities

    • Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) methods for modeling electron transfer events

  • Microfluidic Technologies:

    • Droplet-based assays for high-throughput screening of cemA-metabolite interactions

    • Artificial chloroplast membrane systems for controlled transport studies

    • Surface-immobilized cemA arrays for multiplexed interaction analysis

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.