Leptospira interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae serovar copenhageni: This refers to a specific serovar within the Icterohaemorrhagiae serogroup of Leptospira interrogans, a bacterium causing leptospirosis. Serovars Copenhageni and Icterohaemorrhagiae are among the most virulent and commonly associated with severe human infections .
Anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase (trpD): This enzyme is crucial in tryptophan biosynthesis, catalyzing the transfer of a phosphoribosyl group from phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate (PRPP) to anthranilate, forming phosphoribosyl anthranilate .
Serovar Copenhageni is a significant pathogen within the Icterohaemorrhagiae serogroup, known for its virulence and prevalence in certain regions like the British Isles . Genetic studies have identified distinct genetic markers and variations between Copenhageni and Icterohaemorrhagiae serovars, including differences in the lic12008 gene .
trpD is a member of the phosphoribosyltransferase superfamily and plays a pivotal role in tryptophan biosynthesis. It has been studied extensively in various organisms for its catalytic activity and structural characteristics . The enzyme's ability to bind substrates like anthranilate and PRPP is crucial for its function, with specific residues contributing to substrate binding and catalysis .
While there is no direct literature on recombinant trpD from Leptospira interrogans serovar Copenhageni, recombinant enzymes are often used in research to study enzyme function, improve production efficiency, or develop diagnostic tools. The development of a recombinant trpD from this serovar could potentially aid in understanding tryptophan biosynthesis in Leptospira or serve as a tool for studying pathogenic mechanisms.
Given the lack of specific data on "Recombinant Leptospira interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae serovar copenhageni Anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase (trpD)", we can look at related research:
Genetic Diversity of Leptospira Serovars: Studies have shown significant genetic diversity among Leptospira serovars, including differences in single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and insertions/deletions (indels) .
trpD Enzyme Characteristics: The trpD enzyme is highly conserved across different species, with specific motifs involved in substrate binding and catalysis .
KEGG: lic:LIC_12541
STRING: 267671.LIC12541
Anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase (trpD) is an essential enzyme in the tryptophan biosynthesis pathway of Leptospira interrogans. It catalyzes the transfer of the phosphoribosyl group from 5-phosphoribosyl-1-pyrophosphate (PRPP) to anthranilate, forming phosphoribosyl anthranilate. This reaction represents the second step in the tryptophan biosynthetic pathway, which is critical for bacterial protein synthesis and survival.
The enzyme's presence in pathogenic Leptospira species suggests an important role in bacterial metabolism during infection, potentially enabling the pathogen to synthesize tryptophan in environments where this amino acid is limited. Similar to other bacterial proteins, trpD expression may be regulated in response to environmental conditions encountered during the infection process.
Methodologically, the function of trpD can be studied through:
Enzymatic assays measuring the conversion of anthranilate to phosphoribosyl anthranilate
Complementation studies in tryptophan auxotrophic bacterial strains
Growth inhibition studies using competitive inhibitors of the enzyme
Recombinant production of Leptospira interrogans trpD has been successfully achieved using several expression systems, each with specific advantages depending on research objectives:
E. coli expression systems:
BL21(DE3) strain combined with pET-based vectors provides high yield production
Fusion tags (His6, GST, or MBP) improve solubility and facilitate purification
Cold-shock expression (16-18°C) significantly reduces inclusion body formation
Auto-induction media can increase protein yield while reducing manipulation steps
Cell-free expression systems:
Useful for rapid screening of expression conditions
Avoids toxicity issues sometimes encountered with membrane-associated proteins
Allows incorporation of unnatural amino acids for structural studies
Expression optimization protocol typically involves:
Codon optimization for the host expression system
Testing multiple fusion tags and cleavage sites
Screening expression temperatures (16-37°C) and induction conditions
Varying cell lysis methods to maximize recovery of soluble protein
Similar to the experimental approaches used for other leptospiral proteins, purification protocols typically employ immobilized metal affinity chromatography followed by size exclusion chromatography to obtain pure, homogeneous preparations suitable for structural and functional studies .
Verification of structural integrity for recombinant trpD requires a multi-method approach:
Biophysical characterization methods:
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to assess secondary structure composition
Thermal shift assays to determine protein stability and folding
Dynamic light scattering to confirm monodispersity and absence of aggregation
Size-exclusion chromatography with multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS) to determine oligomeric state
Functional verification:
Enzymatic activity assays comparing kinetic parameters with reported values
Substrate binding studies using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC)
Inhibitor sensitivity profiles to confirm active site integrity
Structural analysis:
Limited proteolysis to identify stable domains and proper folding
Mass spectrometry to confirm the exact molecular weight and post-translational modifications
X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM for tertiary structure determination
A typical verification workflow would include initial screening with CD spectroscopy and thermal shift assays before proceeding to more resource-intensive methods like crystallography. Researchers should compare results against known parameters for similar enzymes from other bacterial species to benchmark purification quality.
Several robust methodologies are available for characterizing the enzymatic activity of trpD:
Spectrophotometric assays:
Continuous monitoring of anthranilate consumption (λ = 340 nm)
HPLC-based detection of phosphoribosyl anthranilate formation
Coupled enzyme assays using auxiliary enzymes from the tryptophan biosynthesis pathway
Radioactive assays:
[14C]-labeled anthranilate incorporation into phosphoribosyl anthranilate
Detection via scintillation counting or autoradiography
Advanced kinetic analysis:
Pre-steady state kinetics using stopped-flow techniques
Temperature and pH dependence profiling
Substrate competition studies
Experimental parameters table:
| Parameter | Typical Range | Optimization Notes |
|---|---|---|
| pH | 7.0-8.5 | Buffer systems should avoid phosphate due to potential inhibition |
| Temperature | 25-37°C | May vary based on strain adaptation temperature |
| [Enzyme] | 10-100 nM | Lower concentrations for steady-state kinetics |
| [Anthranilate] | 1-500 μM | Should span Km (typically 20-50 μM) |
| [PRPP] | 10-1000 μM | Often rate-limiting; may require fresh preparation |
| Mg2+ | 5-10 mM | Essential cofactor for activity |
Similar experimental approaches have been used successfully to characterize other leptospiral enzymes, with necessary modifications to account for specific biochemical properties of trpD .
Investigating the immunogenicity of Leptospira interrogans trpD requires comprehensive approaches that span both humoral and cellular immune responses:
Human serum reactivity studies:
Western blot analysis using convalescent sera from confirmed leptospirosis patients
ELISA-based quantification of antibody titers against recombinant trpD
Epitope mapping using peptide arrays to identify immunodominant regions
This approach can be modeled after studies of other leptospiral proteins, where researchers have used serum samples from leptospirosis patients to detect antibody recognition, suggesting expression during infection .
In vitro immune cell stimulation:
Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) proliferation assays
Cytokine profiling following trpD stimulation
Dendritic cell maturation and antigen presentation analysis
Animal model studies:
Immunization protocols with recombinant trpD
Challenge studies to assess protective efficacy
Adoptive transfer experiments to determine protective immune components
Comparative immunological data for different leptospiral proteins:
| Protein | Seropositivity in Patients (%) | Predominant Isotype | Key Cytokine Response | Protection in Animal Models |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LipL32 | 95-100% | IgG1, IgG2 | IFN-γ, TNF-α | Partial |
| LigA/LigB | 70-90% | IgG1, IgG3 | IFN-γ, IL-6 | Significant |
| trpD | Requires investigation | Requires investigation | Requires investigation | Requires investigation |
| LRR proteins | Variable (37-80%) | IgG1, IgG2 | IL-1β, TNF-α | Variable |
A crucial methodological consideration is the TLR2 response, which has been shown to be downregulated in some human leptospirosis cases . This finding contrasts with most in vitro and animal studies, suggesting that human immune responses to leptospiral proteins may differ significantly from laboratory models. Investigating whether trpD affects TLR2 expression or signaling would provide valuable insights into its immunomodulatory potential.
Understanding trpD interactions with host cell receptors requires sophisticated methodological approaches:
Binding studies with host components:
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to quantify binding kinetics
Protein-protein interaction arrays to identify potential binding partners
Pull-down assays coupled with mass spectrometry for unbiased interaction screening
Cell adhesion and invasion assays:
Fluorescently-labeled recombinant trpD tracking in cell cultures
Competitive inhibition studies with anti-trpD antibodies
siRNA knockdown of candidate receptors to confirm specificity
Receptor specificity profiling:
Similar to studies with leptospiral leucine-rich repeat (LRR) proteins, trpD should be tested for interactions with:
Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)
Integrin receptors
Extracellular matrix components
Interaction visualization:
Immunofluorescence microscopy to localize binding
Proximity ligation assays for in situ interaction detection
Atomic force microscopy to measure binding forces
The secretion and membrane association patterns observed for LRR proteins in Leptospira suggest a methodological framework for investigating whether trpD is similarly secreted and capable of reassociating with the bacterial surface. Cross-reactivity controls are essential, as antibodies against structurally similar proteins may recognize multiple targets.
Multiple complementary structural biology approaches can be employed to resolve the three-dimensional structure of trpD:
X-ray crystallography:
Optimization of crystallization conditions using sparse matrix screens
Microseeding techniques to improve crystal quality
Heavy atom derivatization for phase determination
Molecular replacement using structures from homologous proteins
Cryo-electron microscopy:
Single particle analysis for higher molecular weight complexes
Data collection strategies at varying defocus values
3D reconstruction algorithms optimized for relatively small proteins
Local resolution estimation to identify flexible regions
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy:
Selective isotopic labeling (15N, 13C, 2H) for backbone assignment
TROSY-based experiments for improved spectral quality
Residual dipolar coupling measurements for refinement of domain orientations
Paramagnetic relaxation enhancement for long-range constraint determination
Integrative modeling approaches:
Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) for solution shape determination
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry for dynamics insights
Computational modeling validated by experimental constraints
Molecular dynamics simulations to predict ligand binding modes
Standardized structural validation metrics:
| Validation Parameter | Target Value for High Quality | Notes for trpD Analysis |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution (X-ray) | <2.0 Å | Lower is better for active site details |
| R-free | <25% | Key validation metric for X-ray structures |
| Ramachandran outliers | <1% | Measures backbone geometry quality |
| Clashscore | <5 | Reflects proper packing of side chains |
| Map resolution (cryo-EM) | <3.5 Å | Sufficient for side chain placement |
| RMSD (NMR) | <0.5 Å for backbone atoms | Ensemble consistency metric |
Regardless of the method chosen, careful attention to protein sample quality is essential, as heterogeneity can significantly impact structural determination success.
Identifying inhibitors of trpD follows a systematic drug discovery pipeline:
Virtual screening approaches:
Structure-based virtual screening using molecular docking
Pharmacophore modeling based on substrate binding site features
Fragment-based design targeting high-conservation regions
Quantum mechanical calculations to predict transition state analogs
High-throughput screening methodologies:
Fluorescence-based activity assays adaptable to 384-well format
Thermal shift assays to identify stabilizing ligands
Surface plasmon resonance fragment screening
DNA-encoded library technology for vast chemical space exploration
Structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies:
Systematic modification of hit compounds
Bioisosteric replacement strategies
Computational prediction of ADMET properties
Crystallographic confirmation of binding modes
Whole-cell validation approaches:
Growth inhibition of Leptospira under tryptophan-limited conditions
Synergy testing with existing antibiotics
Resistance development monitoring
Selectivity screening against human enzymes
Inhibitor development pipeline metrics:
| Stage | Success Criteria | Typical Timeframe | Key Challenges for trpD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary screening | Z' > 0.7, hit rate 0.1-1% | 2-3 months | Assay miniaturization |
| Hit validation | >50% confirmed, diverse scaffolds | 1-2 months | False positives elimination |
| Hit-to-lead | IC50 <10 μM, selectivity >10x | 6-12 months | Improving potency |
| Lead optimization | IC50 <1 μM, suitable ADMET | 12-24 months | Maintaining selectivity |
| Preclinical candidate | In vivo efficacy, safety margin | 6-12 months | Bioavailability in infection sites |
Computational approaches drawing on existing structural data for homologous enzymes can accelerate the initial stages of this pipeline, particularly if experimental structures of trpD become available.
Genetic manipulation of Leptospira to study trpD function requires specialized approaches due to the challenging nature of leptospiral genetics:
Gene knockout strategies:
Homologous recombination using suicide vectors
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing adapted for Leptospira
Transposon mutagenesis with targeted screening for trpD disruption
Conditional knockdown using inducible antisense RNA
Complementation approaches:
Trans-complementation with wild-type or mutated trpD variants
Site-specific integration at safe harbor loci
Inducible expression systems to control timing and level
Fluorescent protein fusions for localization studies
Reporter systems:
Transcriptional fusions to monitor trpD promoter activity
Translational fusions to study protein localization and trafficking
Dual reporter systems to normalize for cellular state
FRET-based biosensors to detect metabolic changes
In vivo infection models:
Hamster and guinea pig models for acute leptospirosis
Mouse models for chronic colonization
Zebrafish embryo models for real-time visualization
Competition assays between wild-type and trpD mutants
Technical considerations for genetic manipulation:
| Technique | Advantages | Limitations | Success Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allelic exchange | Clean modification | Labor-intensive | 10-30% |
| Transposon mutagenesis | High-throughput | Random insertion | Variable |
| CRISPR-Cas9 | Precise editing | Delivery challenges | Emerging technology |
| Conditional systems | Temporal control | Leakiness concerns | Requires optimization |
A methodological consideration highlighted in leptospiral research is the need to use low-passage virulent strains alongside culture-attenuated strains when studying protein expression , as gene expression patterns may differ significantly between laboratory-adapted and virulent leptospires.
Future research on Leptospira interrogans trpD should address several key knowledge gaps:
Structural biology frontiers:
Determination of high-resolution structures in apo and substrate-bound states
Elucidation of allosteric regulation mechanisms
Comparative structural biology across pathogenic and saprophytic Leptospira species
Molecular dynamics simulations to understand catalytic mechanism
Physiological role exploration:
Metabolic flux analysis to quantify tryptophan biosynthesis contribution
Systems biology approaches to map regulatory networks
Adaptation mechanisms during host infection vs. environmental survival
Interplay between tryptophan biosynthesis and virulence factor expression
Translational research opportunities:
Evaluation of trpD as diagnostic biomarker for early leptospirosis detection
Assessment of vaccine potential alone or as carrier protein
Development of selective inhibitors as novel therapeutics
Point-of-care detection systems based on trpD activity
The contrasting findings between human clinical samples and laboratory models in leptospirosis research underscore the importance of validating experimental findings in clinically relevant settings. Future studies on trpD should incorporate both traditional laboratory approaches and analyses of human clinical samples to ensure translational relevance.