KEGG: lil:LA_2781
STRING: 189518.LA_2781
The structure of atpF in Leptospira interrogans follows the canonical organization of ATP synthase b subunits, though no crystal structure specifically for Leptospira atpF has been published. Based on sequence analysis and homologous proteins, the structure likely includes:
An N-terminal hydrophobic domain that forms a transmembrane helix, anchoring the protein in the bacterial membrane
A central coiled-coil region that extends from the membrane
A C-terminal domain that interacts with other components of the ATP synthase complex
These structural elements enable atpF to function as part of the stator, resisting the rotational torque generated during ATP synthesis. While atpF doesn't directly catalyze ATP synthesis, its structural integrity is essential for maintaining the proper orientation of the F1 and F0 sectors, allowing efficient energy conversion .
To determine the precise structure of Leptospira atpF, researchers would need to employ techniques such as X-ray crystallography, cryo-electron microscopy, or NMR spectroscopy, similar to approaches used for other bacterial ATPases described in the literature .
Global proteome analyses of Leptospira interrogans have revealed complex protein expression changes in response to environmental conditions that mimic the host environment. When exposed to conditions mimicking infection (serum factors and iron limitation), Leptospira interrogans undergoes significant alterations in its proteome, including changes in energy metabolism proteins .
Research has shown that proteins involved in energy production, metabolism, and regulation tend to be downregulated when Leptospira is shifted to an in vivo-like environment. Specifically, researchers noted: "proteins involved in the process of protein synthesis were downregulated, reflecting the general trend toward downregulation of proteins involved in energy production, metabolism, and regulation."
While atpF wasn't specifically mentioned in these studies, as part of the ATP synthesis machinery, it may follow similar expression patterns. This adaptive response likely helps Leptospira conserve energy while adjusting to the host environment. To directly investigate atpF expression during infection, researchers would need to employ techniques such as quantitative proteomics (iTRAQ), RT-PCR, or targeted western blotting .
Based on published protocols for recombinant Leptospira interrogans atpF production, the following methodological approach has been successful:
Expression System:
Host: Escherichia coli
Vector: Expression vector with N-terminal His-tag
Strain: Standard BL21(DE3) strains for recombinant protein expression
Protein Properties:
Full-length protein: 173 amino acids
Includes N-terminal His-tag for purification
Production Protocol:
Transform expression vector into competent E. coli cells
Culture in appropriate media with selection antibiotics
Induce protein expression (typically with IPTG)
Harvest cells and lyse to release recombinant protein
Purify using affinity chromatography (His-tag binding)
Perform additional purification steps as needed (size exclusion chromatography)
Storage Conditions:
Lyophilized powder form for long-term stability
Reconstitute in deionized sterile water (0.1-1.0 mg/mL)
Add 5-50% glycerol for storage at -20°C/-80°C
Researchers should note that membrane-associated proteins like atpF may present solubility challenges. Expression at lower temperatures (16-18°C) and the inclusion of mild detergents during purification may improve yields of properly folded protein.
While atpF itself doesn't possess intrinsic ATPase activity (it's a structural component of the ATP synthase complex), researchers interested in ATP synthase function can measure the activity of the complete complex or reconstituted sub-complexes. Based on methodologies used for other Leptospira ATPases, the following approach would be suitable:
Sample Preparation:
Express and purify recombinant atpF with minimal contamination from other ATPases
For full ATP synthase activity, reconstitute with other subunits or use membrane preparations
Activity Assay Methods:
Colorimetric Phosphate Detection:
Measure release of inorganic phosphate using malachite green or molybdate blue assays
Include appropriate time points to establish linear reaction rates
Coupled Enzyme Assays:
Link ATP hydrolysis to NADH oxidation through pyruvate kinase and lactate dehydrogenase
Monitor absorbance change at 340 nm continuously
Reaction Conditions:
Buffer: Typically Tris or HEPES, pH 7.4-8.0
Essential cofactor: Mg²⁺ (2-5 mM)
Other divalent cations to test: Mn²⁺, Ca²⁺, Zn²⁺
ATP concentration: 1-5 mM
Temperature: 25-37°C
Controls and Validation:
Negative control: Heat-inactivated enzyme
Positive control: Commercial F-type ATPase
Specificity validation: ATPase inhibitors (oligomycin, DCCD)
For comprehensive kinetic analysis, researchers should measure activity across a range of ATP concentrations to determine Km, Vmax, and other kinetic parameters.
Purifying functional recombinant atpF protein presents several technical challenges that researchers must address:
Membrane Protein Solubility:
atpF contains a hydrophobic transmembrane domain, making it difficult to maintain in solution
Standard approaches must be modified to accommodate membrane protein characteristics
Protein Folding Issues:
Heterologous expression in E. coli may lead to improper folding
Risk of inclusion body formation requiring refolding procedures
Contaminating ATPases:
E. coli expresses numerous ATPases that may contaminate preparations
Particularly problematic: DnaK and GroEL/GroES chaperones with intrinsic ATPase activity
Potential Solutions:
Use mild detergents or amphipols to maintain membrane protein solubility
Express at lower temperatures (16-18°C) to improve folding
Consider specialized E. coli strains (C41/C43) designed for membrane protein expression
Implement rigorous purification protocol including:
Affinity chromatography (His-tag)
Size exclusion chromatography to remove contaminating proteins
Ion exchange chromatography for additional purity
Activity Preservation:
Include stabilizing agents during purification (glycerol, specific lipids)
Minimize exposure to extreme conditions
Consider co-expression with other ATP synthase components for stability
These technical considerations are essential for obtaining pure, properly folded, and functionally active atpF protein for subsequent structural and functional studies.
Leptospira interrogans must adapt to diverse environmental conditions during its lifecycle, transitioning between external environments and various host tissues. The ATP synthase complex, including atpF, likely plays a key role in this adaptability:
Environmental Persistence:
Leptospira interrogans "can live for weeks to months in the ground or water"
Maintaining energy production during environmental persistence requires functional ATP synthase
Host Colonization Strategies:
Different hosts respond differently to infection: "Some hosts are susceptible to leptospirosis whereas mice are resistant and get chronically colonized"
These varying colonization patterns likely require metabolic adaptations powered by ATP synthase
Metabolic Flexibility:
Proteomic analysis reveals that when exposed to in vivo-like conditions, Leptospira demonstrates "a complex change in protein expression profiles"
This adaptive response includes modulation of energy production pathways
Chronic Kidney Colonization:
Leptospira establishes long-term colonization in kidney proximal tubules: "leptospires...reappear around 8 days post-infection localized in the proximal tubules of the kidneys, where they establish a life-long chronic colonization"
This persistence requires sustained energy production under specialized conditions
The capacity of Leptospira to adapt its energy metabolism to different environments is likely crucial for its persistence. The ATP synthase complex, with atpF as an essential component, provides the energy required for these adaptations, making it an important contributor to the bacterium's lifecycle and pathogenicity.
While direct interactions between atpF and the host immune system aren't explicitly described in the literature, several potential mechanisms can be inferred:
Potential for Antigenic Recognition:
Contribution to Pathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns (PAMPs):
Components of ATP synthase could potentially be recognized by pattern recognition receptors
This recognition could contribute to innate immune activation
Role in Energy-Dependent Immune Evasion:
Leptospira employs sophisticated immune evasion strategies requiring energy
"Leptospira interrogans prevents macrophage cell death and dampens inflammation" through mechanisms that require ATP
The leptospiral LPS "efficiently prevents caspase 11 dimerization and subsequent gasdermin D cleavage," inhibiting pyroptosis
Host Immune Response to Leptospira:
Infection triggers NLRP3-inflammasome activation and IL1β secretion
Leptospira has mechanisms to prevent massive IL1β release: "pyroptosis escape by leptospires prevents massive IL1β release"
These immune interactions require metabolic energy provided by ATP synthase
Future research directions could include:
Assessing whether atpF is recognized by antibodies during natural infection
Determining if recombinant atpF stimulates immune cell activation
Investigating whether atpF mutations affect Leptospira's ability to evade immune clearance
The potential of recombinant atpF as a leptospirosis vaccine component must be evaluated in the context of existing vaccine research. While no studies have directly tested atpF as a vaccine antigen, related research provides valuable insights:
Properties Favoring Vaccine Potential:
Essential protein: As a component of ATP synthase, atpF is likely conserved across Leptospira serovars
Potential T-cell epitopes: Internal peptides may stimulate cell-mediated immunity
Demonstrated recombinant production: Successfully expressed in E. coli with His-tag
Comparative Vaccine Research:
Other recombinant Leptospira proteins have shown promise as vaccine candidates
For example, "All hamsters immunized with recombinant LigA survived after challenge and had no significant histopathological changes"
These successful candidates can serve as benchmarks for evaluating atpF
Challenges for atpF as a Vaccine Antigen:
Membrane localization: The transmembrane domain may limit accessibility to antibodies
Conservation across species: High conservation could raise concerns about cross-reactivity
Unknown immunogenicity: Immune response to atpF during natural infection is not well-characterized
Potential Experimental Approach:
Express and purify recombinant atpF or immunogenic fragments
Assess immunogenicity in animal models
Challenge immunized animals with virulent Leptospira
Evaluate protection in terms of:
Survival rates
Bacterial burden in tissues
Histopathological changes
Antibody titers
Given the challenges in developing effective leptospirosis vaccines, atpF might be more valuable as part of a multi-component vaccine rather than as a stand-alone antigen.
Selection of appropriate adjuvants is critical for enhancing the immunogenicity of recombinant protein vaccines. While specific studies on adjuvants for atpF are lacking, research with other Leptospira antigens provides guidance:
Adjuvants Used in Leptospirosis Vaccine Research:
Aluminum hydroxide: "Golden Syrian hamsters were immunized at 3 and 6 weeks of age with rLigA with aluminum hydroxide as an adjuvant"
This traditional adjuvant has demonstrated effectiveness with at least one Leptospira antigen
Potential Adjuvant Options for atpF:
| Adjuvant | Mechanism | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aluminum salts (alum) | Antigen retention, NLRP3 inflammasome activation | Well-established safety profile, Strong antibody response | Weaker Th1/cell-mediated immunity |
| Oil-in-water emulsions (MF59, AS03) | Enhanced antigen uptake, local inflammation | Stronger humoral responses than alum, Better for suboptimal antigens | Increased reactogenicity |
| TLR agonists (MPLA, CpG) | Direct activation of innate immune receptors | Strong Th1 response, Enhanced cell-mediated immunity | May require combination with carrier |
| Combination systems (AS04, AS01) | Multiple immune activation pathways | Balanced immune response, Potentially better protection | More complex formulation |
Methodological Considerations:
Comparative adjuvant testing with recombinant atpF
Evaluation of both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses
Assessment of memory response and duration of protection
Safety and reactogenicity profiling
The ideal adjuvant would enhance both antibody and T-cell responses against atpF while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. Given the potential limitations of atpF as an antigen (membrane association, potential conservation), more potent adjuvant systems may be required to achieve protective immunity.
Developing vaccines that protect against multiple Leptospira serovars remains a significant challenge in leptospirosis research. This is particularly relevant given that "there are more than 200 diverse pathogenic Leptospira serovars, making it challenging to develop an effective vaccine" . For atpF-based vaccines, several strategies could enhance cross-protection:
Sequence Conservation Analysis:
Determine the degree of atpF sequence conservation across relevant Leptospira serovars
Identify conserved epitopes that could provide broad protection
Focus vaccine design on these conserved regions
Multi-serovar Formulations:
Include atpF variants from multiple clinically important serovars
Example comparison table:
| Serovar | atpF Sequence Identity | Key Epitope Conservation |
|---|---|---|
| Lai | 100% (reference) | All major epitopes |
| Copenhageni | ~95-98% (estimated) | Most major epitopes |
| Pomona | ~90-95% (estimated) | Variable conservation |
| Canicola | ~90-95% (estimated) | Variable conservation |
| Hardjo | ~85-90% (estimated) | Limited conservation |
Chimeric Antigen Approach:
Engineer chimeric proteins containing protective epitopes from multiple serovars
Express these as single recombinant proteins to simplify manufacturing
Combination with Other Antigens:
Pair atpF with other protective antigens like LigA, which has demonstrated efficacy: "All hamsters immunized with recombinant LigA survived after challenge"
Create multivalent vaccines targeting different aspects of Leptospira biology
Validation Protocol:
Immunize animal models with candidate formulations
Challenge with different Leptospira serovars independently
Measure protection parameters for each serovar
Assess cross-reactive antibodies using serological techniques
Cross-protection remains one of the most significant challenges in leptospirosis vaccine development. While the conservation of essential proteins like atpF offers potential advantages, careful epitope selection and formulation design would be critical for achieving broad protection against multiple serovars.
Structural variations in atpF across different Leptospira species may have significant implications for function, although this area remains largely unexplored. A comprehensive research approach would involve:
Sequence Analysis:
Comparative sequence alignment of atpF across pathogenic and non-pathogenic Leptospira species
Identification of conserved domains essential for function
Mapping of variable regions that may confer species-specific properties
Structural Implications:
Homology modeling of atpF proteins from different species
Prediction of how sequence variations affect protein folding and interactions
Identification of species-specific structural features
Functional Assessment:
Expression of atpF variants from different species
Reconstitution studies with ATP synthase components
Measurement of ATP synthesis/hydrolysis rates under varying conditions
Evolutionary Context:
Analysis of selective pressures on atpF across Leptospira evolution
Correlation of structural variations with ecological niches and host adaptation
Identification of residues under positive selection
These variations could influence properties such as:
Efficiency of ATP synthesis
Stability under different environmental conditions
Interactions with other ATP synthase components
Response to inhibitors or regulatory factors
Understanding these structural-functional relationships would provide insights into Leptospira species-specific adaptations and potentially reveal new targets for therapeutic intervention.
While atpF itself has not been directly implicated in metal homeostasis, research on related ATPases in Leptospira provides valuable insights into potential connections:
Evidence from Related ATPases:
A Leptospira ABC ATPase has been shown to be involved in divalent cation uptake
Inactivation of this ATPase "led to mutants unable to grow in medium in which iron was replaced by Mn²⁺"
The same mutation "increased susceptibility to Mn²⁺ toxicity"
Potential Mechanisms:
ATP synthase provides energy for metal transport systems
Changes in membrane potential (influenced by ATP synthase) affect metal ion gradients
Metal ions (particularly Mg²⁺) are essential cofactors for ATP synthesis
Environmental Adaptations:
Leptospira must adapt to wildly varying metal concentrations in different environments
During infection, hosts restrict metal availability as a defense mechanism
Environmental persistence requires tolerance to various metal concentrations
Experimental Evidence Needed:
Studies with atpF mutants under varying metal conditions
Measurement of intracellular metal concentrations in wild-type vs. atpF-deficient strains
Transcriptional analysis of metal transport systems in response to atpF mutations
A research approach to explore this question would involve:
Creating conditional atpF mutants or knockdowns
Exposing these strains to media with varying metal concentrations
Measuring growth, survival, and intracellular metal content
Analyzing expression of metal transport systems under these conditions
This research would help elucidate the complex relationship between energy metabolism and metal homeostasis in Leptospira.
ATP synthase represents an attractive target for antimicrobial development due to its essential role in bacterial energy metabolism. Several factors make atpF a potentially valuable drug target:
Target Validation Criteria:
Essentiality: As a component of ATP synthase, atpF likely performs an essential function
Conservation: Relatively conserved across Leptospira species but with differences from mammalian homologs
Accessibility: The membrane location presents challenges but also opportunities for targeted compounds
Potential Antimicrobial Strategies:
Direct inhibition of ATP synthase function:
Small molecules targeting the interface between atpF and other ATP synthase components
Compounds disrupting the stator function of atpF
Protein-protein interaction disruptors:
Molecules preventing proper assembly of the ATP synthase complex
Peptides mimicking critical interaction surfaces
Membrane-targeting approaches:
Compounds that interact with the transmembrane domain of atpF
Disruption of localization or membrane insertion
Precedents in Other Bacteria:
Bedaquiline, a drug for multi-drug resistant tuberculosis, targets the c subunit of mycobacterial ATP synthase
This precedent suggests that ATP synthase components can be selectively targeted
Research and Development Pathway:
High-resolution structural studies of atpF and its interactions
In silico screening for potential binding molecules
Biochemical assays to evaluate effects on ATP synthase function
Whole-cell testing for antimicrobial activity and specificity
Pharmacokinetic and toxicity studies of promising compounds
The successful development of atpF-targeting antimicrobials would provide a new tool for treating leptospirosis, potentially with activity against multiple serovars due to the conserved nature of this essential protein.