Recombinant Listeria innocua serovar 6a UPF0344 protein lin2366, also referred to as Lin2366, is a protein expressed in Listeria innocua serovar 6a . It is also referred to as UPF0344 protein lin2366 .
The protein Lin2366 is derived from Listeria innocua, a species closely related to Listeria monocytogenes, a well-known intracellular pathogen . While L. innocua is generally considered non-pathogenic, studies have revealed that certain atypical hemolytic L. innocua isolates can exhibit virulence, crossing the intestinal epithelium and spreading systemically .
Listeria monocytogenes utilizes internalin (InlA) for cellular entry, a protein that, when introduced into Listeria innocua, confers the ability to invade cells . Furthermore, research into multi-drug resistant Listeria innocua isolates has identified Listeria Pathogenicity Island-4 (LIPI-4), potentially linked to meningitis cases, suggesting shared origins and transmission potential with L. monocytogenes .
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your preferred format in order notes for customized fulfillment.
Note: Our standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us; we will prioritize fulfilling your request.
KEGG: lin:lin2366
STRING: 272626.lin2366
Listeria innocua serovar 6a UPF0344 protein lin2366 is an uncharacterized protein from the non-pathogenic bacterial species Listeria innocua, specifically from strain CLIP 11262. The protein belongs to the UPF0344 protein family, a designation for uncharacterized protein families with unknown function. The lin2366 gene encodes a 120-amino acid protein with a predicted transmembrane domain structure .
Characterization approaches for this protein typically include:
Sequence alignment with homologous proteins
Transmembrane domain prediction using bioinformatics tools
Protein structure prediction using computational methods
Functional assays based on genomic context analysis
The amino acid sequence of lin2366 is:
MWGYVHLISWVAIVVLTVTALLIYSKSKVKGFTMLQMINRFYILVILSGIMMVQYSVKESWILAILKILMGIIVIGVVEMLLSYRKQQKPTGMFLMIFIIVVVITVSLGFYLSGGYPLFN
This protein is typically characterized as having a molecular weight of approximately 13.4 kDa and contains hydrophobic regions consistent with membrane association.
Listeria innocua and Listeria monocytogenes share significant genomic similarity, which enables potential gene transfer between these species. Key comparative characteristics include:
Both species often occupy the same ecological niches, facilitating horizontal gene transfer
L. innocua lacks the Listeria Pathogenicity Island 1 (LIPI-1) genes present in L. monocytogenes, which contributes to its non-pathogenic nature
Despite lacking LIPI-1, L. innocua can carry multiple virulence genes involved in adhesion, invasion, surface protein anchoring, peptidoglycan modification, and intracellular survival
A detailed genomic analysis revealed that L. innocua isolates carry 13 virulence genes involved in various functions:
Adhesion (fbpA, lap)
Invasion (iap/cwhA, gtcA, lpeA)
Surface protein anchoring (lspA)
Peptidoglycan modification (oatA, pdgA)
Intracellular survival (lplA1, prsA2)
This genetic similarity makes L. innocua an important model organism for studying gene transfer mechanisms and potential virulence factor acquisition in Listeria species.
Multiple expression systems have been validated for recombinant lin2366 production, each with specific advantages depending on research objectives:
| Expression System | Advantages | Considerations | Tag Options |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yield, cost-effective, rapid expression | May require codon optimization, potential for inclusion bodies | Various tags available including His-tag, Avi-tag Biotinylated |
| Yeast | Eukaryotic post-translational modifications, secretion capabilities | Longer production time, more complex media requirements | Multiple tag options |
| Baculovirus | Insect cell expression, complex protein folding | Higher cost, specialized expertise required | Various tag options |
| Mammalian cell | Native-like folding, complex post-translational modifications | Highest cost, longest production time | Multiple tag options |
| Cell-free expression | Rapid production, avoids toxicity issues | Lower yield, higher cost per mg protein | Various tag options |
For lin2366, E. coli expression systems have been successfully utilized, with protein purity typically greater than 85% as determined by SDS-PAGE . The choice of expression system should be guided by the specific research application, with consideration for required protein modifications, folding requirements, and downstream applications.
Purification of recombinant lin2366 requires consideration of its membrane-associated properties. Recommended methodologies include:
Initial Preparation:
Centrifugation of expression culture
Cell lysis via sonication or mechanical disruption
Membrane fraction isolation through differential centrifugation
Purification Strategy:
Final Processing:
Quality control should include SDS-PAGE analysis with a minimum purity threshold of 85% . For transmembrane proteins like lin2366, detergent screening may be necessary to maintain protein solubility throughout the purification process.
Proper storage of recombinant lin2366 is crucial for maintaining its structural integrity and functional properties. Recommended storage protocols include:
Store lyophilized protein at -20°C upon receipt
For reconstituted protein, aliquot to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) to prevent freeze damage
For long-term storage, maintain at -80°C
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles which can lead to protein degradation
Shelf life is dependent on multiple factors including storage temperature, buffer composition, and presence of stabilizing agents. Validation of protein integrity after storage periods is recommended through techniques such as SDS-PAGE and activity assays appropriate to the research application.
Studying an uncharacterized protein like lin2366 requires a robust experimental design approach. Key considerations include:
Factorial Design Approach:
Implement a full factorial design of experiments (DoE) methodology to systematically evaluate multiple variables affecting protein function
Include factors such as temperature, pH, ionic strength, and potential binding partners
Consider using a 3-way crossover design similar to those employed in protein requirement studies
Control Selection:
Include positive controls (known functional proteins from the same family)
Include negative controls (denatured protein, buffer-only conditions)
Consider using a closely related UPF0344 protein from another Listeria species as a comparative control
Variable Optimization:
Data Analysis:
When planning experiments, remember that "At the heart of every Data Science project exists the planning, design and execution of experiments. Such experiments aim at understanding the data, potentially cleaning it and performing the necessary data analysis for knowledge discovery and decision-making" .
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides powerful insights into the genomic context and potential function of lin2366. Methodological approaches include:
Sequencing Strategy:
Employ next-generation sequencing platforms (Illumina, PacBio, or Oxford Nanopore)
Aim for high coverage (>30x) to ensure accurate assembly
Consider long-read sequencing to resolve repetitive regions and plasmids
Bioinformatic Analysis Pipeline:
Assembly using tools like SPAdes or Unicycler
Gene prediction and annotation using Prokka or RAST
Specific analysis of lin2366 genomic context
Comparative genomics with other Listeria species
Screen for antimicrobial resistance genes using ResFinder
Identify virulence genes using VFDB
lin2366 Specific Analysis:
Examine upstream and downstream regulatory elements
Identify potential operons containing lin2366
Look for conserved domains and motifs within the protein sequence
Conduct single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis to identify strain variations
Functional Inference:
In a recent study using this approach, "phylogenetic analysis revealed 422–1,091 SNP differences between our isolates and global lineages of L. innocua" , demonstrating the power of WGS for detailed characterization.
While Listeria innocua is generally considered non-pathogenic, understanding potential virulence factors is crucial for comprehensive characterization:
Genomic Screening Approaches:
Functional Assays:
Cell invasion assays using epithelial cell lines
Intracellular survival assays in macrophage models
Adhesion assays to evaluate binding to host cell components
Heat stress response assays to evaluate clpL gene function
Protein-Protein Interaction Studies:
Co-immunoprecipitation to identify binding partners
Yeast two-hybrid screening
Proximity labeling in bacterial systems
Protein cross-linking followed by mass spectrometry
Animal Models:
Mouse infection models to assess pathogenicity
Compare wild-type and lin2366 knockout strains
Evaluate immune responses to recombinant lin2366
Recent studies have shown that L. innocua isolates carry multiple virulence genes despite lacking the Listeria Pathogenicity Island 1, suggesting potential for virulence factor acquisition through horizontal gene transfer . Specifically, researchers should investigate the relationship between lin2366 and the heat resistance conferred by clpL genes found on plasmids in L. innocua .
Plasmids play a significant role in bacterial adaptation and gene transfer, including potential effects on lin2366:
Plasmid Analysis Methods:
Functional Relationships:
Investigate potential co-localization of lin2366 with plasmid-borne genes
Examine expression changes in the presence of different plasmids
Study horizontal transfer of plasmids between Listeria species
Specific Plasmid Considerations:
Experimental Approaches:
Plasmid curing experiments to evaluate phenotypic changes
Complementation studies using cloned lin2366
Reporter gene fusions to study expression regulation
Research has shown that "The five isolates possessed an ATP-dependent protease (clpL) gene, which mediates heat resistance, on a rep25 type plasmids" , suggesting important functional relationships between plasmid-borne genes and cellular physiology that may impact lin2366 function.
Comprehensive structural characterization of UPF0344 family proteins like lin2366 requires a multi-technique approach:
Computational Structure Prediction:
Homology modeling using related protein structures
Ab initio modeling for novel structural elements
Molecular dynamics simulations to predict conformational changes
Transmembrane domain prediction using specialized algorithms
Experimental Structure Determination:
X-ray crystallography (challenging for membrane proteins)
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) for structure determination
Cryo-electron microscopy for membrane protein complexes
Circular dichroism spectroscopy for secondary structure analysis
Functional Structure Analysis:
Site-directed mutagenesis of predicted functional residues
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry for dynamics
Crosslinking studies to identify intramolecular contacts
Fluorescence spectroscopy to monitor conformational changes
Membrane Integration Studies:
Proteoliposome reconstitution
Nanodiscs for membrane protein stabilization
Detergent screening for optimal solubilization
Topology mapping using accessibility labeling
For transmembrane proteins like lin2366, specialized methods such as the MNP platform that "extracts high-purity nanoscale cell membrane particles while maintaining the conformation and activity of membrane proteins" may be particularly valuable for structural studies.
CRISPR-Cas9 technology provides powerful tools for functional genomics studies of lin2366:
Gene Knockout Strategies:
Design guide RNAs targeting lin2366
Create clean deletions using homology-directed repair
Generate knockout strains to evaluate phenotypic effects
Implement controls with non-targeting gRNAs
Gene Modification Approaches:
Create point mutations in functional domains
Generate epitope-tagged versions for localization studies
Engineer promoter replacements to modulate expression
Introduce fluorescent protein fusions for live imaging
Experimental Design Considerations:
Plan complementation studies to confirm specificity
Include phenotypic assays relevant to predicted function
Consider essential gene status and design conditional knockouts if necessary
Validate edits through sequencing and expression analysis
Advanced Applications:
CRISPRi for tunable gene repression
CRISPRa for targeted gene activation
Multiplexed editing to study genetic interactions
Prime editing for precise sequence modifications
When designing CRISPR experiments, consider implementing a "comprehensive full factorial Design of Experiment methodology" to systematically evaluate the effects of lin2366 modification across different genetic backgrounds and environmental conditions.
Determining optimal protein requirements for recombinant lin2366 expression requires systematic investigation:
Expression Optimization:
Systematically vary protein concentration in expression media
Test different amino acid supplementation strategies
Evaluate expression at varying temperatures (15-37°C)
Optimize induction conditions (timing, inducer concentration)
Methodological Approach:
Use the indicator amino acid oxidation (IAAO) technique to determine optimal protein requirements
Implement a multi-level experimental design with different protein intakes
Use labeled amino acids (e.g., l-[1-¹³C]-lysine) as indicators of protein synthesis
Measure ¹³CO₂ production as a primary indicator of protein synthesis
Data Analysis:
Identify breakpoints in protein synthesis efficiency
Calculate the estimated average requirement (EAR) for protein
Determine the bioavailability of different protein sources
Compare efficiency across different expression systems
Folding Considerations:
Test chaperone co-expression strategies
Evaluate folding in different detergent environments
Optimize redox conditions for proper disulfide formation
Consider slow temperature ramping for improved folding
Research on protein requirements has shown that "current protein recommendations may be underestimated" , suggesting that optimizing protein conditions could significantly improve recombinant protein expression and folding efficiency.
Accurate species identification is crucial when working with Listeria strains:
Molecular Identification Methods:
Biochemical Differentiation:
API Listeria system for biochemical profiling
Hemolysis testing (L. innocua is non-hemolytic)
Carbohydrate utilization patterns
Phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C activity
lin2366-Specific Identification:
Design PCR primers specific to the lin2366 gene of L. innocua
Develop antibodies against unique epitopes of the lin2366 protein
Use sequence analysis to distinguish from homologs in other species
Challenges and Solutions:
Research has shown that "When biochemical and molecular methods gave conflicting data (29 strains), a third method, multiplex PCR of the iap gene, was performed" , highlighting the importance of using multiple identification approaches for accurate species determination.