Recombinant Listeria monocytogenes serovar 1/2a Uncharacterized protein Lmo0128 (lmo0128)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your preferred format in order notes for customized fulfillment.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Our proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notification and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer components, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
lmo0128; Uncharacterized protein Lmo0128
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-140
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Listeria monocytogenes serovar 1/2a (strain ATCC BAA-679 / EGD-e)
Target Names
lmo0128
Target Protein Sequence
MEVILKFGILGFGAIFGYLFGEVDLLVKVLVCFIVADYISGLLASGYLGELSSKMGFKGI AKKIAILILVAIAHQIDLILGTHNTTRDAVIFFYLANELISILENFVRMGMKVPEVLKNL ILIFDAKSGEDEEKHDKDMD
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: lmo:lmo0128

STRING: 169963.lmo0128

Protein Families
Cp-1 holin family
Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is Lmo0128 and why is it significant in research?

Lmo0128 is an uncharacterized protein from Listeria monocytogenes serovar 1/2a (strain ATCC BAA-679/EGD-e). Despite being labeled as "uncharacterized," it has gained research interest due to its potential role in L. monocytogenes pathogenesis and adaptation. The protein consists of 140 amino acids with the sequence: MEVILKFGILGFGAIFGYLFGEVDLLVKVLVCFIVADYISGLLASGYLGELSSKMGFKGIAKKIAILILVAIAHQIDLILGTHNTTRDAVIFFYLANELISILENFVRMGMKVPEVLKNLILIFDAKSGEDEEKHDKDMD . Understanding this protein may provide insights into L. monocytogenes virulence mechanisms, particularly in the context of its ability to adapt to various environments during infection.

How is recombinant Lmo0128 typically prepared for research use?

Recombinant Lmo0128 preparation typically involves:

  • Cloning the full-length coding sequence (1-140 aa) into expression vectors

  • Transformation into expression hosts (commonly E. coli)

  • Induction of protein expression (often using IPTG for T7-based systems)

  • Cell lysis and protein extraction

  • Purification using affinity chromatography (His-tag purification being most common)

  • Quality control by SDS-PAGE (>85-90% purity standard)

  • Storage in Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol at -20°C/-80°C

For optimal stability, avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles and store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week. Expression in eukaryotic systems (yeast, insect, or mammalian cells) may be considered when post-translational modifications are required .

How can researchers validate Lmo0128 expression in recombinant systems?

Validating Lmo0128 expression requires a multi-technique approach:

  • SDS-PAGE and Western blotting: Using anti-His antibodies for His-tagged variants or custom antibodies raised against Lmo0128 peptides.

  • Mass spectrometry: To confirm protein identity and integrity, particularly tryptic peptide fingerprinting.

  • ELISA: For quantitative measurement when antibodies are available.

  • RT-qPCR: To verify transcription levels in expression systems.

Most reliable results combine protein-level detection (Western blot) with sequence verification (mass spectrometry). For Western blotting, researchers should use appropriate controls including recombinant Lmo0128 standards of known concentration, and negative controls from non-transformed cells .

What are effective methods for studying Lmo0128 function when it's uncharacterized?

For uncharacterized proteins like Lmo0128, a systematic functional characterization approach should include:

  • Comparative genomics: Analyzing gene conservation across Listeria species/strains to infer evolutionary importance.

  • Gene knockout studies: Creating deletion mutants (ΔLmo0128) to observe phenotypic changes in various conditions (pH stress, osmotic stress, etc.).

  • Transcriptional analysis: RNA-seq to identify co-expressed genes that may suggest functional relationships.

  • Protein-protein interaction studies: Pull-down assays, yeast two-hybrid, or proximity labeling to identify interaction partners.

  • Subcellular localization: Immunofluorescence or GFP fusion to determine where Lmo0128 localizes in bacterial cells.

  • Heterologous expression: Expression in model organisms to observe phenotypic effects.

Researchers studying Lmo0128 should consider developing a deletion mutant using methods similar to those described for other Listeria genes, such as the SOE (splicing by overlap extension) method .

How can researchers effectively use Lmo0128 in immunological studies?

For immunological applications:

  • Antigen preparation: Purify recombinant Lmo0128 to >90% purity using affinity chromatography.

  • Antibody generation: Immunize animals (rabbits or mice) with purified protein with appropriate adjuvants.

  • Epitope mapping: Using peptide arrays to identify immunodominant regions.

  • T-cell response assessment: Measure cytokine production (IFN-γ, IL-2) by ELISpot or flow cytometry following stimulation with Lmo0128.

  • Cross-reactivity testing: Evaluate antibody specificity against other Listeria proteins.

Researchers should note that L. monocytogenes has been developed as a vaccine vector for delivering heterologous antigens , so understanding the immunogenicity of its native proteins, including Lmo0128, may inform vaccine development strategies.

How might the function of Lmo0128 relate to L. monocytogenes pathogenesis and adaptation?

While Lmo0128's specific function remains undetermined, several hypotheses can be investigated based on L. monocytogenes pathogenesis mechanisms:

  • Potential role in acid tolerance: Given that L. monocytogenes possesses several systems for acid tolerance (GAD system, ADI pathway) , Lmo0128 might participate in pH homeostasis networks.

  • Possible involvement in membrane integrity: The hydrophobic domains suggest membrane association, potentially contributing to membrane adaptation during environmental stress.

  • Role in intracellular survival: As L. monocytogenes transitions from food environments to the gastrointestinal tract and then intracellular locations, Lmo0128 might facilitate adaptation to these changing environments.

Research approaches should include expression profiling under various stress conditions (pH, bile, oxidative stress) and virulence assays comparing wild-type and Lmo0128 deletion mutants in infection models.

How should researchers reconcile contradictory data when studying Lmo0128?

When confronting contradictory results in Lmo0128 studies:

When publishing contradictory findings, researchers should clearly report all experimental conditions, strain information, and methodological details to enable proper evaluation by the scientific community.

What are the most appropriate experimental controls when working with Lmo0128?

Robust experimental design for Lmo0128 research requires:

Positive controls:

  • Well-characterized proteins of similar size/structure with His-tags

  • Known L. monocytogenes membrane proteins when studying localization

  • Reference proteins with established expression patterns for transcriptional studies

Negative controls:

  • Empty vector transformants for expression studies

  • Isogenic deletion mutants (ΔLmo0128) for functional studies

  • Heterologous proteins with similar tags for specificity testing

Technical controls:

  • Standard curve of purified Lmo0128 for quantification

  • Multiple reference genes for qPCR normalization

  • Biological replicates from independent cultures

  • Controls for post-translational modifications when expressed in different hosts

Researchers should also include strain-specific controls when working across different L. monocytogenes serovars, as genetic differences between strains may affect interpretation .

How does Lmo0128 compare across different Listeria species and strains?

Comparative genomic analysis reveals:

Species/StrainLmo0128 Homolog PresentSequence Identity (%)Key Sequence VariationsGenomic Context
L. monocytogenes serovar 1/2aYes (reference)100-Conserved flanking genes
L. monocytogenes serovar 4bYes~85-90Variations in C-terminal regionSimilar genetic neighborhood
L. innocuaYes~75-80N-terminal signal variationsDifferent upstream genes
L. ivanoviiPartial homology~60-65Truncated sequenceDivergent genomic context
L. seeligeriLimited homology~50-55Substantial sequence divergenceDistinct genetic context

The degree of conservation suggests functional importance, with higher conservation among pathogenic species potentially indicating relevance to virulence or adaptation. Researchers should consider these variations when designing experiments across Listeria species or interpreting cross-species findings.

How might evolutionary analysis of Lmo0128 inform functional hypotheses?

Evolutionary analysis offers several advantages for functional prediction:

  • Phylogenetic profiling: Identify co-evolved genes that may functionally interact with Lmo0128

  • Selection pressure analysis: Calculate dN/dS ratios to identify regions under positive selection that may indicate host-interaction domains

  • Structural conservation mapping: Determine which protein domains are most conserved across species, suggesting functional importance

  • Horizontal gene transfer assessment: Evaluate if Lmo0128 was acquired from other bacteria, potentially indicating functional adaptation

For Lmo0128, examining its presence/absence pattern across various ecological isolates of L. monocytogenes (from food, clinical, and environmental sources) could reveal associations with specific niches or virulence capabilities. The protein's relationship to adaptation mechanisms described in L. monocytogenes, such as acid tolerance systems (GAD, ADI) and bile resistance mechanisms , should be systematically investigated.

How does research on Lmo0128 fit into our understanding of L. monocytogenes pathogenesis?

Research on Lmo0128 should be contextualized within the broader understanding of L. monocytogenes pathogenesis:

  • Adaptation to host environments: L. monocytogenes possesses sophisticated mechanisms to survive the gastric environment, bile exposure, and competition with intestinal microbiota .

  • Invasion and intracellular lifestyle: The bacterium can enter host cells, escape from phagosomes, multiply in cytoplasm, and spread cell-to-cell .

  • Virulence regulation: Major virulence genes are regulated by PrfA, with additional regulation by Sigma B and other factors that respond to environmental conditions .

As an uncharacterized protein, Lmo0128 may play roles in these processes that have not yet been elucidated. Systematic studies examining Lmo0128 expression and function during different stages of infection would contribute valuable insights to the field.

What transcriptomic or proteomic approaches can reveal Lmo0128's role in different conditions?

Multi-omics approaches offer powerful tools for understanding Lmo0128 function:

  • Transcriptomics:

    • RNA-seq comparing wild-type and Lmo0128 deletion mutants under various stress conditions

    • Time-course analysis during infection of host cells

    • Single-cell RNA-seq to capture population heterogeneity

  • Proteomics:

    • Quantitative proteomics comparing membrane fractions with/without Lmo0128

    • Phosphoproteomics to identify signaling pathways affected by Lmo0128

    • Protein-protein interaction studies using proximity labeling (BioID) or co-immunoprecipitation

  • Integrated approaches:

    • Correlation of Lmo0128 expression with global transcriptional/proteomic changes

    • Multi-condition experiments (pH, temperature, osmolarity variations)

    • In vivo infection models comparing tissue-specific responses

Such experiments should follow designs similar to those used in previous L. monocytogenes studies, where samples from different growth phases and environmental conditions were analyzed to understand adaptation mechanisms .

What are the common challenges in expressing and purifying Lmo0128, and how can they be overcome?

Researchers working with Lmo0128 may encounter several technical challenges:

ChallengePotential SolutionValidation Approach
Low expression yieldOptimize codon usage for expression host; Use stronger promoters; Try different host strainsQuantify protein yield by Bradford assay and SDS-PAGE
Insolubility/Inclusion bodiesExpress at lower temperatures (16-20°C); Use solubility-enhancing tags (SUMO, MBP); Test detergent solubilizationAnalyze soluble vs. insoluble fractions by Western blot
Protein instabilityInclude protease inhibitors; Optimize buffer conditions (pH, salt); Add stabilizing agents (glycerol, reducing agents)Monitor protein stability over time at different storage conditions
Membrane association issuesUse specialized membrane protein extraction methods; Consider amphipols or nanodiscs for native conformationVerify membrane localization by fractionation studies
Tag interference with functionGenerate both N- and C-terminally tagged versions; Include tag removal options (TEV protease site)Compare activities of different constructs and tag-free protein

For Lmo0128, expression in E. coli systems with His-tags appears effective, but researchers should carefully monitor protein quality and ensure proper folding .

How should researchers approach structural studies of Lmo0128?

A systematic approach to Lmo0128 structural characterization would include:

  • Preliminary analysis:

    • Secondary structure prediction using bioinformatics tools

    • Hydrophobicity analysis to identify potential membrane-spanning regions

    • Homology modeling if structural homologs can be identified

  • Experimental techniques progression:

    • Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy for secondary structure composition

    • Limited proteolysis to identify domain boundaries

    • X-ray crystallography attempts with various constructs

    • NMR studies for solution structure (if size permits)

    • Cryo-EM for larger complexes or membrane-embedded forms

  • Functional validation of structural features:

    • Site-directed mutagenesis of key residues identified by structural studies

    • Domain deletion/swapping experiments

    • Cross-linking studies to identify interaction interfaces

Given Lmo0128's potential membrane association, techniques optimized for membrane proteins should be considered, including the use of detergents, nanodiscs, or lipid cubic phase crystallization approaches.

How might Lmo0128 be involved in L. monocytogenes stress response networks?

Given L. monocytogenes' remarkable ability to adapt to diverse environments , Lmo0128 may participate in stress response networks:

  • Potential role in acid stress: L. monocytogenes possesses sophisticated acid response systems, including the GAD system and ADI pathway . Lmo0128 expression patterns under acid stress should be examined.

  • Osmotic stress adaptation: The protein's hydrophobic regions suggest membrane involvement, potentially contributing to membrane integrity during osmotic challenge (relevant to food preservation techniques).

  • Connection to virulence regulation: Many stress response systems in L. monocytogenes are co-regulated with virulence factors. The relationship between Lmo0128 expression and key virulence regulators (PrfA, Sigma B) should be investigated.

  • Interplay with other adaptation systems: Research should examine if Lmo0128 functions independently or as part of known stress response systems like the stress survival islet (SSI-1) .

Future studies should systematically measure Lmo0128 expression under various stress conditions and evaluate phenotypic changes in Lmo0128 deletion mutants.

What novel experimental approaches could advance our understanding of Lmo0128?

Emerging technologies offer new opportunities for Lmo0128 research:

  • CRISPR interference (CRISPRi): For tunable gene repression to study partial loss-of-function phenotypes

  • Single-cell tracking: To observe heterogeneity in Lmo0128 expression during infection processes

  • Microfluidic techniques: For precise control of environmental conditions and real-time observation

  • In situ structural studies: Techniques like cryo-electron tomography for visualizing Lmo0128 in its native cellular context

  • Synthetic biology approaches: Creating synthetic genetic circuits to probe Lmo0128 regulation

  • Host-pathogen interaction models: Organoid systems to study Lmo0128's role during infection of structured human tissues

These approaches could reveal dynamic aspects of Lmo0128 function that traditional methods might miss, particularly regarding its potential roles in adaptation to changing environments during infection.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.