Recombinant Listeria welshimeri serovar 6b UPF0344 protein lwe2280 (lwe2280)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Definition and Basic Properties

Recombinant Lwe2280 is a 120-amino-acid protein (UniProt ID: A0AL16) expressed in Escherichia coli with an N-terminal His tag for purification . Key features include:

PropertyDetails
Source OrganismListeria welshimeri serovar 6b (non-pathogenic Listeria species)
Expression SystemE. coli
TagN-terminal His tag
Molecular WeightCalculated from sequence: ~13.8 kDa
Purity≥90% (SDS-PAGE verified)
StorageLyophilized powder in Tris/PBS buffer with 6% trehalose (pH 8.0)

Expression

  • Cloned in E. coli vectors (e.g., pGex-5X-3) .

  • Induced using IPTG for soluble expression .

Purification

  • Affinity chromatography via His tag .

  • Post-purification steps include buffer exchange into Tris/PBS with trehalose for stabilization .

Reconstitution

  • Recommended dissolution in sterile water to 0.1–1.0 mg/mL, with glycerol (5–50%) added for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C .

Functional and Biochemical Insights

  • Non-Pathogenic Context: L. welshimeri lacks the vgc virulence gene cluster present in pathogenic L. monocytogenes, making Lwe2280 a safe candidate for studying Listeria biology without biosafety concerns .

  • Genomic Context: The lwe2280 gene is part of a conserved region in L. welshimeri but absent in pathogenic Listeria species, suggesting evolutionary divergence .

Applications in Research

  • Comparative Genomics: Used to study gene loss/gain events in Listeria evolution .

  • Protein Interaction Studies: Screened for binding partners using yeast two-hybrid or pull-down assays .

  • Antigen Characterization: Potential use in serological assays due to surface-exposed epitopes (inferred from sequence hydrophobicity) .

Comparative Analysis with Pathogenic Listeria

FeatureL. welshimeri (Lwe2280)L. monocytogenes Homologs
Virulence GenesAbsent Present (e.g., prfA, hlyA)
Genome Size2.81 Mb (smallest in genus) 2.94–3.01 Mb
Hemolytic ActivityNon-hemolytic Hemolytic

Research Limitations and Future Directions

  • Uncharacterized Function: No empirical data on enzymatic or regulatory roles .

  • Structural Studies: No resolved 3D structure; homology modeling required for functional predictions.

  • Biotechnological Potential: Could be engineered as a chassis for vaccine development due to non-pathogenicity .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Please note: We will prioritize shipping the format that is currently in stock. However, if you have specific requirements for the format, kindly include your request in the order notes, and we will prepare the protein accordingly.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributors for specific delivery timelines.
Note: All of our proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. If you require dry ice shipping, please notify us in advance, as additional fees will apply.
Notes
Repeated freezing and thawing is not recommended. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
We recommend centrifuging the vial briefly before opening to ensure the contents settle at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquotting the solution. Store at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final concentration of glycerol is 50%, and customers may use this as a reference.
Shelf Life
The shelf life of our proteins is influenced by various factors, including storage conditions, buffer ingredients, storage temperature, and the inherent stability of the protein itself.
Generally, the shelf life of liquid form is 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. The shelf life of lyophilized form is 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot the protein for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
We will determine the tag type during the production process. If you have a specific tag type requirement, please inform us, and we will prioritize the development of the specified tag.
Synonyms
lwe2280; UPF0344 protein lwe2280
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-120
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Listeria welshimeri serovar 6b (strain ATCC 35897 / DSM 20650 / SLCC5334)
Target Names
lwe2280
Target Protein Sequence
MWGYVHLISWVAIVVLTVTALAIYSKSTKGFTILQMINRIFYILVILSGVMMVQYSVEQS WILAIFKILMGIIVIGVVEMLLSYRKQQKPTGMFLMIFIIVVVITVSLGFYLSGGYPLFN
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: lwe:lwe2280

STRING: 386043.lwe2280

Protein Families
UPF0344 family
Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the basic structural information for Listeria welshimeri serovar 6b UPF0344 protein lwe2280?

Listeria welshimeri serovar 6b UPF0344 protein lwe2280 (UniProt accession: A0AL16) is a 120-amino acid protein with a primary sequence of MWGYVHLISWVAIVVLTVTALAIYSKSTKGFTILQMINRIFYILVILSGVMMVQYSVEQSWILAIFILMGIIVIGVVEMLLSYRKQQKPTGMFLMIFIIYVVITVSIGFYLSGGYPLFN. The protein is characterized by its membrane-associated domains, suggesting its localization in the bacterial cell membrane . Expression studies typically focus on the region spanning amino acids 1-120, representing the full-length protein .

Why is Listeria welshimeri serovar 6b of interest to researchers?

Listeria welshimeri is a non-pathogenic member of the Listeria genus, making it valuable for comparative genomic studies with pathogenic species like L. monocytogenes. The UPF0344 protein family, to which lwe2280 belongs, contains proteins of unknown function, presenting opportunities for novel functional characterization. Researchers use this system to investigate bacterial protein expression mechanisms, membrane protein organization, and potential applications in recombinant protein technology. Understanding non-pathogenic Listeria species provides insights into evolutionary relationships within the genus and may contribute to identifying factors that determine pathogenicity.

What are the optimal storage conditions for maintaining recombinant lwe2280 stability?

Recombinant lwe2280 should be stored in Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol at -20°C for standard storage conditions . For extended storage, maintaining the protein at -80°C is recommended . To minimize protein degradation, researchers should avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles, with the recommendation to prepare working aliquots stored at 4°C for up to one week of active use . When handling the protein, temperature fluctuations should be minimized, and appropriate protease inhibitors may be included based on experimental requirements.

How should researchers design a quasi-experimental study to investigate lwe2280 function?

When designing a quasi-experimental study for lwe2280 functional analysis, researchers should carefully consider that quasi-experimental designs offer limited control over participant selection and assignment compared to true experimental designs . For protein function studies, this translates to scenarios where complete randomization of bacterial strains or conditions may not be possible.

A recommended approach includes:

  • Selecting comparable bacterial strain groups (treatment vs. control)

  • Establishing clear pre-experimental observations

  • Implementing the experimental treatment (e.g., protein expression induction)

  • Conducting post-treatment measurements

  • Controlling for potential confounding variables

This design is particularly useful when investigating lwe2280 within its native bacterial context where complete genetic homogeneity cannot be assured . Researchers should acknowledge the limitations in establishing causal relationships due to potentially uncontrolled variables.

What control groups should be included when studying recombinant lwe2280 protein activity?

For robust experimental design when studying recombinant lwe2280 activity, researchers should implement a factorial design approach that includes multiple control groups:

Grouplwe2280 ProteinTag PresentBuffer CompositionPurpose
ExperimentalActiveYesCompleteTest complete protein activity
Control 1Inactive (heat-denatured)YesCompleteControl for non-specific effects
Control 2AbsentNoCompleteBackground activity baseline
Control 3ActiveNo (cleaved)CompleteControl for tag interference
Control 4ActiveYesMinimalControl for buffer components

This factorial design allows researchers to isolate specific variables' effects and ensure observed activities are attributable to the lwe2280 protein itself rather than experimental artifacts . When analyzing data from this design, researchers should employ appropriate statistical methods to account for multiple variables, such as two-way ANOVA or more complex multivariate analyses.

What are the advanced considerations for longitudinal studies involving lwe2280 protein expression?

Longitudinal studies examining lwe2280 expression present unique methodological challenges. Researchers should consider:

  • Temporal sampling strategy with consistent intervals to capture expression dynamics

  • Preservation of sample integrity across time points to ensure data comparability

  • Implementation of mixed-effects statistical models to account for time-dependent variations

  • Inclusion of appropriate time-matched controls

  • Documentation of environmental conditions that might influence expression levels

When designing such studies, researchers must address potential confounding factors through either experimental control or statistical adjustment during analysis . For bacterial systems expressing lwe2280, considerations should include growth phase effects, media composition stability, and potential genetic drift in cultures maintained over extended periods. Data collection should incorporate multiple methodologies (e.g., protein quantification, functional assays, and transcriptomic analysis) to provide comprehensive temporal profiles.

What expression systems are most effective for producing recombinant lwe2280 protein?

The selection of an optimal expression system for recombinant lwe2280 depends on research objectives and protein application. Based on the protein's characteristics, including its membrane-associated domains, several expression systems may be considered:

  • E. coli-based systems: Provide high yield but may require optimization for membrane proteins. BL21(DE3) strains with T7 promoter systems offer controlled induction using IPTG. For membrane proteins like lwe2280, specialized E. coli strains such as C41(DE3) or C43(DE3) may enhance proper folding.

  • Listeria-based homologous expression: May provide more native-like protein conformation but typically yields lower protein quantities. This approach is particularly valuable for functional studies requiring authentic post-translational modifications.

  • Cell-free expression systems: Allow for the direct synthesis of membrane proteins in the presence of lipids or detergents, potentially enhancing solubility and proper folding.

When selecting an expression system, researchers should consider downstream applications and whether conformational authenticity or quantity is the primary concern .

What purification strategies should be employed for membrane-associated proteins like lwe2280?

Purifying membrane-associated proteins such as lwe2280 requires specialized approaches:

  • Membrane extraction: Initial solubilization using appropriate detergents (e.g., n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside or CHAPS) at concentrations above their critical micelle concentration.

  • Affinity chromatography: Utilizing the protein's tag system for initial purification; based on available information, the tag type for lwe2280 is determined during the production process and should be selected based on experimental requirements .

  • Size exclusion chromatography: To separate protein-detergent complexes from free detergent and aggregates.

  • Quality assessment: Multiple analytical techniques including SDS-PAGE, Western blotting, and mass spectrometry should be employed to verify protein purity and integrity.

  • Functional validation: Activity assays specific to the protein's known or predicted function should be developed to ensure the purified protein retains its native activity.

The purification protocol should be optimized iteratively, with particular attention to detergent concentration and buffer composition to maintain protein stability throughout the process.

How can researchers accurately quantify recombinant lwe2280 protein yield and purity?

Accurate quantification and purity assessment of recombinant lwe2280 require a multi-method approach:

  • Protein concentration determination:

    • Bradford or BCA assays adjusted for detergent interference

    • UV absorbance at 280 nm with correction for the protein's specific extinction coefficient

    • Amino acid analysis for absolute quantification

  • Purity assessment:

    • SDS-PAGE with densitometric analysis

    • HPLC-based methods

    • Mass spectrometry for accurate molecular weight confirmation

  • Functional quantification:

    • Development of activity assays specific to lwe2280's function

    • Ligand binding assays if applicable

  • Structural integrity verification:

    • Circular dichroism to assess secondary structure content

    • Limited proteolysis to evaluate proper folding

A comprehensive quantification approach should combine at least three independent methods to ensure accuracy, with particular attention to the challenges posed by membrane proteins in detergent solutions .

What biophysical methods are most appropriate for analyzing the structural characteristics of lwe2280?

For comprehensive structural characterization of lwe2280, researchers should employ multiple complementary biophysical techniques:

The integration of multiple techniques provides complementary structural information, compensating for the limitations of individual methods .

How can researchers design functional assays for a protein of unknown function like lwe2280?

Designing functional assays for proteins of unknown function like lwe2280 requires a systematic approach:

  • Bioinformatic prediction:

    • Sequence comparison with functionally characterized proteins

    • Structural homology modeling

    • Analysis of conserved domains and motifs

  • Context-based hypothesis generation:

    • Examining genomic context of lwe2280 in Listeria welshimeri

    • Analyzing potential protein-protein interaction networks

    • Investigating expression patterns under different conditions

  • Systematic screening approaches:

    • Substrate screening panels

    • Interaction partner identification using pull-down assays

    • Phenotypic analysis of knockout/overexpression systems

  • Activity validation strategies:

    • In vitro reconstitution of predicted activities

    • Complementation studies in deficient bacterial strains

    • Site-directed mutagenesis of predicted catalytic residues

For membrane proteins like lwe2280, special consideration should be given to assays that can accommodate the protein in its native lipid environment or suitable detergent micelles to maintain functional conformation .

What advanced techniques should be employed to investigate protein-protein interactions involving lwe2280?

For investigating protein-protein interactions involving membrane-associated proteins like lwe2280, researchers should consider these advanced techniques:

  • Membrane-based approaches:

    • Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) in bacterial systems

    • Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) for proximity analysis

    • Cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry to identify interaction interfaces

  • Label-free interaction analysis:

    • Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) with the protein immobilized in lipid nanodiscs

    • Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) for thermodynamic characterization

    • Microscale Thermophoresis for interactions in complex solutions

  • Systems-level approaches:

    • Bacterial two-hybrid systems adapted for membrane proteins

    • Co-immunoprecipitation with antibodies against lwe2280 or potential partners

    • Proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID) adapted for bacterial systems

  • Computational methods:

    • Molecular dynamics simulations of lwe2280 in membrane environments

    • Protein-protein docking algorithms optimized for membrane proteins

    • Network analysis to predict functional associations

These techniques should be applied in combination, as each provides different and complementary information about interaction characteristics, strength, specificity, and biological context .

How should researchers approach conflicting results in lwe2280 functional studies?

When confronted with conflicting results in lwe2280 functional studies, researchers should implement a systematic resolution strategy:

  • Methodological reconciliation:

    • Compare experimental conditions in detail (buffer composition, temperature, pH)

    • Assess protein preparation methods for potential differences in structural integrity

    • Evaluate assay sensitivity and specificity across studies

  • Statistical reassessment:

    • Perform power analysis to determine if sample sizes were adequate

    • Consider applying more robust statistical methods appropriate for the data distribution

    • Implement meta-analysis techniques if multiple studies are available

  • Biological context consideration:

    • Investigate strain-specific differences that might impact protein function

    • Consider post-translational modifications or interaction partners that may vary between experimental systems

    • Examine whether conflicting results might represent different functional states of the protein

  • Targeted validation experiments:

    • Design experiments specifically to address the source of conflict

    • Include positive and negative controls that can discriminate between alternative hypotheses

    • Consider using orthogonal methods to approach the same functional question

Resolution of conflicting data should be viewed as an opportunity to develop a more nuanced understanding of protein function rather than simply selecting preferred results .

What statistical approaches are most appropriate for analyzing dose-response relationships in lwe2280 activity assays?

For rigorous analysis of dose-response relationships in lwe2280 activity assays, researchers should consider these statistical approaches:

  • Non-linear regression models:

    • Four-parameter logistic models for typical sigmoidal dose-response curves

    • Five-parameter logistic models when asymmetry is observed

    • Specialized models for complex relationships (e.g., bell-shaped responses)

  • Parameter estimation and comparison:

    • EC50/IC50 determination with confidence intervals

    • Hill coefficient calculation to assess cooperativity

    • Maximum response (Emax) comparison across experimental conditions

  • Advanced statistical considerations:

    • Heteroscedasticity correction when variance changes with response magnitude

    • Outlier identification and appropriate handling

    • Model selection criteria (AIC, BIC) to determine optimal model complexity

  • Experimental design optimization:

    • Power analysis to determine appropriate replicate numbers

    • Optimal concentration spacing strategies (typically logarithmic)

    • Inclusion of appropriate positive and negative controls at multiple concentrations

When analyzing dose-response data, researchers should report full parameter sets with confidence intervals rather than single points, and clearly describe the model selection process and fitting criteria .

How can researchers effectively incorporate structural equation modeling in lwe2280 research?

Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) offers powerful analytical possibilities for integrating multiple facets of lwe2280 research:

  • Applications in protein research:

    • Modeling relationships between protein structural features and functional outcomes

    • Integrating multiple experimental measurements into unified functional models

    • Testing hypothesized causal pathways in protein interaction networks

  • Implementation approach:

    • Define latent variables representing unmeasured constructs (e.g., "membrane insertion efficiency")

    • Specify measurement models connecting observed data to latent constructs

    • Develop structural models describing relationships between constructs

    • Test model fit using appropriate indices (CFI, RMSEA, SRMR)

  • Advanced considerations:

    • Mediation analysis to identify mechanisms through which lwe2280 affects cellular processes

    • Multi-group analysis to compare protein behavior across different experimental conditions

    • Longitudinal SEM for time-course experiments examining protein dynamics

  • Technical requirements:

    • Sufficient sample size for model complexity (typically n>200 for complex models)

    • Thoughtful handling of missing data using appropriate methods (FIML, multiple imputation)

    • Verification of assumptions including multivariate normality or selection of appropriate estimation methods

SEM is particularly valuable for integrating diverse data types (structural, functional, interaction) into cohesive models of protein function, allowing researchers to test complex hypothetical frameworks about lwe2280's role in cellular processes .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.