Recombinant Lodderomyces elongisporus Probable Endonuclease LCL3 (LCL3) is a recombinant protein derived from the yeast species Lodderomyces elongisporus. This protein is classified as a probable endonuclease, suggesting its potential role in DNA cleavage or processing within the cell. The recombinant form of this protein is produced for research purposes, often used in studies related to molecular biology and enzymology.
Species Origin: The protein is derived from Lodderomyces elongisporus, a yeast species known for its elongated cell morphology and classification within the CTG clade, where the CUG codon is translated as serine instead of leucine .
Protein Details:
Sequence: The amino acid sequence of LCL3 includes motifs typical of endonucleases, such as MPPVPVNSTSQDYYGVLEPRVWLLSAGLAASAIFSYKIYRRYFRRIRSILDFTPEALEKN HKLYGYVTRVGDGDNFRFYHTPGGWLLGWGWLRKVPLDNRRIMKDETLMIRLCGVDAPER AHFGKPAQPFSEDALLWLKNYLLGRYVTVTPYSIDQYKRIVGRCQVWKWNGKKDVSAEmL KNGVAIVYEGKVGAEFGDNEDRYRSLEKRAKWLKRGVWSIGKKMMTPGEYKKVYYRGE .
Tag Information: The tag type for this recombinant protein is determined during the production process .
Storage Conditions: The protein is stored in a Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol at -20°C or -80°C. Repeated freezing and thawing should be avoided .
| Characteristic | Description |
|---|---|
| Species Origin | Lodderomyces elongisporus |
| Protein Sequence | MPPVPVNSTSQDYYGVLEPRVWLLSAGLAASAIFSYKIYRRYFRRIRSILDFTPEALEKN HKLYGYVTRVGDGDNFRFYHTPGGWLLGWGWLRKVPLDNRRIMKDETLMIRLCGVDAPER AHFGKPAQPFSEDALLWLKNYLLGRYVTVTPYSIDQYKRIVGRCQVWKWNGKKDVSAEmL KNGVAIVYEGKVGAEFGDNEDRYRSLEKRAKWLKRGVWSIGKKMMTPGEYKKVYYRGE |
| Tag Information | Determined during production |
| Storage Conditions | Tris-based buffer, 50% glycerol, -20°C or -80°C |
| Quantity Available | 50 µg (other quantities available upon inquiry) |
KEGG: lel:LELG_03542
STRING: 379508.XP_001525614.1
Lodderomyces elongisporus is a diploid ascomycete yeast that is increasingly recognized as an emerging human fungal pathogen. Originally described as Saccharomyces elongisporus in 1952 from Californian citrus concentrate, this organism has since been isolated from diverse sources including soil, fermented food products, plants, stored apples, pigeon excreta, insects, marine fish, hospital environments, and humans .
The significance of L. elongisporus for researchers stems from several key factors:
For molecular biologists and clinical microbiologists, L. elongisporus represents an important model organism for studying fungal pathogenesis, antifungal resistance mechanisms, and hospital-acquired infections.
Accurate identification of L. elongisporus requires a combination of phenotypic and molecular methods, as conventional identification techniques often misclassify it as Candida parapsilosis. The following methodological approaches are recommended:
Culture characteristics: L. elongisporus forms cream-colored colonies on Sabouraud dextrose agar and grows as oval to elongated cells or in pseudohyphal form . On CHROMagar, it produces distinctive turquoise blue colonies compared to the white to pale pink colonies of C. parapsilosis .
Microscopic examination: Under Lactophenol Cotton Blue (LPCB) staining, L. elongisporus shows a significantly higher proportion of elongated budding yeast cells compared to other yeast species, with conidia typically measuring 2–6 × 4–7 µm .
Sugar utilization tests: The API 20C AUX system can be used, with particular attention to arabinose utilization. The innovative "Loddy test" specifically designed to distinguish L. elongisporus from other Candida species is based on the characteristic non-utilization of arabinose by L. elongisporus .
ITS sequencing: Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region sequencing is considered the gold standard for definitive identification . This approach targets the variable regions of the ribosomal DNA and can clearly distinguish L. elongisporus from closely related species.
MALDI-TOF MS: Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometry has been shown to accurately identify L. elongisporus, though reference databases must include appropriate entries for this species .
Whole-genome sequencing: For research purposes or outbreak investigations, whole-genome sequencing provides definitive identification and additional insights into strain relatedness, antimicrobial resistance determinants, and virulence factors .
| Step | Method | Observation | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Culture on SDA and CHROMagar | Cream colonies on SDA; turquoise blue on CHROMagar | Presumptive L. elongisporus |
| 2 | Microscopic examination (LPCB) | Predominantly elongated yeast cells (2–6 × 4–7 µm) | Supportive of L. elongisporus |
| 3 | Arabinose utilization test | Negative arabinose utilization | Characteristic of L. elongisporus |
| 4 | MALDI-TOF MS | Match to L. elongisporus reference spectra | Confirmatory identification |
| 5 | ITS sequencing | >99% identity to reference sequences | Definitive identification |
When investigating an outbreak or conducting research studies, whole-genome sequencing should be considered to establish strain relatedness and detect potential adaptive mutations .
Understanding the antifungal susceptibility profiles and resistance mechanisms of L. elongisporus is crucial for both clinical management and fundamental research. Current evidence suggests the following:
In general, clinical isolates of L. elongisporus have shown favorable susceptibility to most antifungal agents. The following susceptibility patterns have been reported:
Genomic analyses have revealed several potential mechanisms for antifungal resistance in L. elongisporus:
Triazole resistance-related genes: Genome sequencing has identified 119 nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 24 triazole resistance-related genes, including three mutations in ERG11 (Met15Leu, Ser183Thr, and Asn363Ile) . These mutations may contribute to reduced azole susceptibility.
Loss of heterozygosity (LOH): Environmental strains of L. elongisporus have demonstrated partial or complete loss of heterozygosity in specific genomic scaffolds, which has been associated with adaptation to environmental stresses and potentially antifungal resistance .
Disinfectant resistance: Clinical and environmental isolates have shown elevated MICs against sodium hypochlorite (>1%), a common disinfecting agent used in healthcare settings . This resistance may contribute to persistence in hospital environments.
The following methodological approaches are recommended for studying antifungal resistance in L. elongisporus:
Standardized susceptibility testing: Using Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) or European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) methodologies to determine MICs.
Time-kill assays: To evaluate the fungicidal versus fungistatic activity of different antifungals against L. elongisporus.
Comparative genomics: To identify potential resistance determinants by comparing susceptible and resistant isolates.
Gene expression studies: To understand the transcriptional response to antifungal exposure.
Biofilm formation assays: To evaluate the role of biofilms in reduced antifungal susceptibility.
Understanding these resistance mechanisms is crucial not only for clinical management but also for developing new antifungal strategies and comprehending the adaptability of this emerging pathogen.
When working with recombinant Lodderomyces elongisporus Probable endonuclease LCL3 (LCL3), researchers should consider the following experimental protocols and recommendations:
Based on the product information for recombinant LCL3 , the following storage conditions are recommended:
Store at -20°C for routine use; for extended storage, conserve at -20°C or -80°C
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing cycles
Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week
The protein is typically provided in a Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol, optimized for stability
To characterize the enzymatic activity of recombinant LCL3, consider the following assays:
Endonuclease activity assay:
Incubate the recombinant LCL3 with various DNA substrates (circular plasmid DNA, linear DNA fragments)
Analyze the cleavage products using agarose gel electrophoresis
Determine substrate specificity by comparing cleavage patterns across different DNA sequences
Kinetic analysis:
Measure the rate of DNA cleavage under varying substrate concentrations
Calculate Km, Vmax, and kcat values to determine enzyme efficiency
Assess the influence of different cations (Mg²⁺, Mn²⁺, Ca²⁺) on enzymatic activity
pH and temperature optimization:
Determine the optimal pH and temperature for enzymatic activity
Evaluate stability across different environmental conditions
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy:
Analyze the secondary structure composition (α-helices, β-sheets) of the purified protein
Assess structural stability under different conditions
X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM:
Determine the three-dimensional structure of LCL3
Identify the active site and potential DNA-binding domains
Site-directed mutagenesis:
Create point mutations in conserved domains to identify essential residues for catalytic activity
Validate the functional importance of predicted active site residues
DNA binding assays:
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) to assess DNA binding capacity
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to determine binding kinetics and affinity
Cell-based assays:
Transfect recombinant LCL3 into mammalian or yeast cells to study cellular effects
Assess potential cytotoxicity and nuclear localization
Interaction studies:
Co-immunoprecipitation to identify potential protein partners
Yeast two-hybrid screening to map the interactome of LCL3
When designing experiments with recombinant LCL3, researchers should include appropriate controls, such as heat-inactivated enzyme or catalytic site mutants, to confirm the specificity of observed effects.
Genomic analyses have provided crucial insights into the biology, pathogenicity, and evolution of Lodderomyces elongisporus. These approaches are especially valuable for understanding this emerging pathogen and its molecular components like the LCL3 endonuclease.
L. elongisporus has a genome size of 15-16 Mb, which is slightly larger than that of C. parapsilosis (12-13 Mb) but comparable to C. albicans (14-16 Mb) and C. tropicalis (14-15 Mb) . Comparative genomic analyses have revealed:
L. elongisporus shares a largely conserved gene order with other species in the Candida clade
The CUG codon in L. elongisporus is translated to serine instead of leucine, a characteristic shared with several pathogenic Candida species
Phylogenetic analyses place L. elongisporus within the Candida clade, closely related to the C. parapsilosis species complex
Genomic analyses have provided important insights into the reproductive biology and adaptive mechanisms of L. elongisporus:
Sexual reproduction:
Genome analysis revealed that L. elongisporus contains partial sequences of both the MTLa and MTLα loci found in related Candida species
Combined with observations of ascospore formation, this suggests L. elongisporus is capable of sexual reproduction via homothallism
This may contribute to its genetic diversity and adaptability
Environmental adaptation:
Recombination:
For researchers working with L. elongisporus and its molecular components like LCL3, genomic approaches offer several advantages:
Functional annotation:
Predict the function of uncharacterized proteins like LCL3 based on sequence homology and conserved domains
Identify regulatory elements controlling gene expression
Virulence determinants:
Identify genes potentially involved in pathogenicity through comparative genomics with non-pathogenic relatives
Analyze selection pressure on specific genes to identify those crucial for host adaptation
Resistance mechanisms:
Identify genetic determinants of antifungal resistance and disinfectant tolerance
Track the evolution of resistance in clinical settings
These genomic approaches provide a foundation for understanding the biology and pathogenicity of L. elongisporus, and offer valuable insights for researchers working with molecular components of this organism, including the LCL3 endonuclease.
Heterologous expression of proteins from Lodderomyces elongisporus, including the Probable endonuclease LCL3, presents several challenges and considerations for researchers. Understanding these issues is essential for successful experimental design and interpretation of results.
L. elongisporus, like other species in the Candida clade, has an alternative genetic code where the CUG codon encodes serine instead of the standard leucine . This unique codon usage has significant implications for heterologous expression:
Proteins from yeasts often undergo various post-translational modifications that may be important for their function:
Glycosylation patterns: L. elongisporus may have species-specific glycosylation that differs from other expression systems
Disulfide bond formation: Proper folding may require correct formation of disulfide bonds
Phosphorylation and other modifications: Functional activity may depend on specific modifications
When expressing LCL3 or other L. elongisporus proteins, researchers should consider:
Using eukaryotic expression systems for proteins requiring complex modifications
Adding appropriate chaperones to aid in folding
Verifying the modification status of the recombinant protein
The following expression systems have different advantages for L. elongisporus proteins:
| Expression System | Advantages | Disadvantages | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yield, simple, inexpensive | Incorrect CUG translation, lack of PTMs, inclusion bodies | Proteins without critical serines at CUG positions, structural studies requiring high yields |
| Pichia pastoris | Correct glycosylation, high yield, secretion | Longer development time | Secreted proteins, enzymes requiring eukaryotic folding |
| S. cerevisiae | Genetic tractability, eukaryotic folding | Incorrect CUG translation, hyperglycosylation | Proteins tolerant of CUG mistranslation |
| Insect cells | Complex PTMs, high expression | Cost, technical complexity | Proteins requiring specific eukaryotic PTMs |
| Mammalian cells | Most complex PTMs, native-like folding | Highest cost, lowest yield | Proteins for interaction studies with mammalian systems |
For recombinant LCL3 specifically:
Fusion tags: Consider the impact of purification tags on enzymatic activity
His-tags generally have minimal impact on endonuclease activity
Larger tags (MBP, GST) may affect substrate access or interactions
Buffer optimization:
Functional validation:
Compare activity of recombinant protein to native protein when possible
Validate substrate specificity across different expression systems
Storage considerations:
By carefully considering these factors, researchers can optimize the heterologous expression of L. elongisporus proteins like LCL3 and ensure that the recombinant proteins accurately represent the native proteins' functional characteristics.
While Lodderomyces elongisporus has primarily been reported in bloodstream infections and endocarditis, emerging evidence indicates it can also cause central nervous system (CNS) infections, including meningitis. Understanding this aspect of L. elongisporus pathogenicity is important for researchers studying fungal neurotropism and clinicians managing these rare but serious infections.
The literature contains limited but significant documentation of L. elongisporus CNS infections:
The first described case of L. elongisporus meningitis was reported in 2021 . This groundbreaking case involved a male patient with a history of rectal adenocarcinoma who presented with headache, neck stiffness, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) abnormalities characteristic of fungal meningitis .
This patient's CSF showed typical findings of fungal meningitis: elevated white blood cell count (6 × 10⁶/L; 52% neutrophils, 41% lymphocytes, 7% monocytes), hypoglycorrhachia (1.1 mmol/L), and significantly elevated protein (4.152 g/L) .
Identification of L. elongisporus in this case required arachnoid biopsy with pathology samples sent for fungal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing after multiple CNS fungal culture specimens were negative .
The identification of L. elongisporus in CNS infections presents specific challenges:
Culture limitations: CSF cultures may remain negative despite active infection, necessitating tissue biopsy .
Molecular diagnostics: ITS sequencing provides definitive identification but requires specialized laboratories .
Neuroimaging findings: There are no pathognomonic radiographic features of L. elongisporus CNS infection described to date, though hydrocephalus may develop as a complication .
Misidentification risk: As with other specimens, L. elongisporus may be misidentified as C. parapsilosis using conventional methods, potentially leading to suboptimal treatment .
Based on the limited available data, the following approaches have been effective for L. elongisporus CNS infections:
Initial therapy with amphotericin B (or liposomal formulation) followed by transition to fluconazole has been successful .
Management of associated complications, such as hydrocephalus, may require neurosurgical intervention, including lumbar drain placement and potentially permanent CSF shunting .
Treatment duration should be extended, with the reported successful case receiving indefinite oral fluconazole after initial intravenous therapy .
For researchers, L. elongisporus CNS infections raise important questions:
Neurotropism mechanisms: What genetic or physiological factors allow L. elongisporus to cross the blood-brain barrier and establish CNS infection?
Comparative virulence: How does the neurotropism of L. elongisporus compare to that of related species like C. parapsilosis?
Host factors: What host factors predispose to CNS infection with L. elongisporus, given that the documented case occurred in a patient with a history of malignancy and chemotherapy?
Diagnostic strategies: What novel diagnostic approaches might improve detection of L. elongisporus in CSF specimens?
Researchers investigating these questions may consider animal models of fungal CNS infection, comparative genomics of neurotropic versus non-neurotropic strains, and development of enhanced molecular diagnostic methods for CSF specimens.
Understanding the function of the LCL3 endonuclease in Lodderomyces elongisporus requires sophisticated molecular approaches. The following methodologies represent cutting-edge techniques that researchers can employ to elucidate the biological role and biochemical properties of this protein.
CRISPR-Cas9 and related technologies can be adapted for L. elongisporus to study LCL3 function:
Gene knockout studies:
Generate LCL3 deletion mutants to assess the phenotypic consequences
Evaluate effects on growth, stress response, DNA repair, and pathogenicity
Compare mutant and wild-type strains under various environmental conditions
Promoter modifications:
Create strains with inducible or repressible LCL3 expression
Study dosage effects and temporal requirements for LCL3 function
Tagged variants:
Generate strains expressing epitope-tagged or fluorescent protein-fused LCL3
Study subcellular localization and dynamics during different growth phases and stress conditions
RNA-Seq analysis:
Compare transcriptomes of wild-type and LCL3 mutant strains
Identify genes co-regulated with LCL3 under different conditions
Construct gene regulatory networks to place LCL3 in its functional context
Ribosome profiling:
Assess translation efficiency of LCL3 and related genes
Identify post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms
Proteomics:
Perform quantitative proteomics on wildtype versus LCL3 mutants
Identify protein interaction partners through co-immunoprecipitation coupled with mass spectrometry
Analyze post-translational modifications that may regulate LCL3 activity
Cryo-electron microscopy:
Determine high-resolution structure of LCL3 alone and in complex with substrate DNA
Visualize conformational changes during catalysis
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS):
Map protein dynamics and conformational changes
Identify regions involved in substrate binding and catalysis
NMR spectroscopy:
Characterize protein-DNA interactions at atomic resolution
Study dynamic aspects of enzyme function
In vitro reconstitution:
Reconstitute LCL3 with potential cofactors and regulators
Determine minimal components required for activity
High-throughput substrate screening:
Utilize DNA libraries to identify preferred cleavage sites and sequence specificity
Develop fluorescence-based assays for kinetic studies
Single-molecule approaches:
Apply fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) to study enzyme dynamics
Use optical tweezers or atomic force microscopy to study mechanical aspects of DNA-protein interactions
A systematic approach to LCL3 characterization might proceed as follows:
Generate genetic tools: Develop CRISPR-Cas9 system optimized for L. elongisporus
Create strain resources: Generate knockout, conditional, and tagged LCL3 variants
Phenotypic characterization: Assess growth, stress response, and pathogenicity
Molecular characterization: Perform RNA-Seq and proteomics on key strains
Biochemical analysis: Express and purify recombinant protein for in vitro studies
Structural studies: Determine 3D structure and dynamics
Functional integration: Synthesize findings into a comprehensive model of LCL3 function
By applying these advanced techniques in a coordinated fashion, researchers can develop a comprehensive understanding of LCL3's role in L. elongisporus biology and potentially identify novel targets for antifungal development.
Research on Lodderomyces elongisporus and its molecular components, including the LCL3 endonuclease, has significant implications for developing novel antifungal strategies. As an emerging pathogen with unique biological characteristics, L. elongisporus offers several opportunities for innovative therapeutic approaches.
Genomic analyses of L. elongisporus have revealed potential targets for antifungal development:
Species-specific targets: Comparative genomics between L. elongisporus and other pathogenic fungi can identify unique genes or pathways that could serve as specific therapeutic targets .
Essential genes: Genome-wide functional screens can identify genes essential for L. elongisporus survival or virulence that could be targeted by antifungals.
Resistance determinants: Genomic analyses have identified 119 nonsynonymous SNPs in 24 triazole resistance-related genes, including three mutations in ERG11 (Met15Leu, Ser183Thr, and Asn363Ile) . Understanding these resistance mechanisms can inform the development of compounds that remain effective against resistant strains.
L. elongisporus possesses several distinctive characteristics that could be leveraged for therapeutic development:
Ascospore formation: Unlike many Candida species, L. elongisporus can form ascospores, which may contribute to environmental persistence . Targeting the sexual reproduction pathway could reduce hospital environmental contamination.
Biofilm formation: While described as limited in some strains, biofilm formation has been observed in clinical isolates . Developing anti-biofilm strategies specific to L. elongisporus could enhance treatment efficacy.
Disinfectant tolerance: Some L. elongisporus strains show elevated MICs against sodium hypochlorite and can survive in its presence . Understanding and targeting this tolerance mechanism could improve infection control measures.
The LCL3 endonuclease represents a potential target for therapeutic development:
If LCL3 plays an essential role in L. elongisporus biology, small molecule inhibitors could be developed as antifungal agents.
Structure-based drug design, using the solved structure of LCL3, could facilitate the development of specific inhibitors.
As an endonuclease, LCL3 may have unique catalytic mechanisms that could be exploited for selective targeting.
Understanding the host-pathogen interaction in L. elongisporus infections could enable immunotherapeutic strategies:
Epitope mapping: Identifying immunodominant epitopes of L. elongisporus, potentially including LCL3, could guide vaccine development.
Immune evasion mechanisms: Elucidating how L. elongisporus avoids host immune responses could reveal targets for immunomodulatory therapies.
Diagnostic targets: Proteins like LCL3 could serve as biomarkers for early and specific diagnosis of L. elongisporus infections, enabling prompt and appropriate treatment.
A comprehensive framework for translating L. elongisporus research into antifungal strategies might include:
| Research Phase | Key Activities | Potential Outcomes |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Research | Genome analysis, protein characterization, virulence studies | Target identification, biological insights |
| Pre-clinical Development | High-throughput screening, medicinal chemistry, animal models | Lead compounds, proof-of-concept |
| Clinical Translation | Biomarker development, clinical trials, resistance monitoring | Diagnostic tools, therapeutic agents |
| Implementation | Epidemiological studies, antifungal stewardship, resistance surveillance | Improved patient outcomes, reduced resistance |
By advancing our understanding of L. elongisporus biology and the function of proteins like LCL3, researchers can contribute to the development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for this emerging fungal pathogen, potentially addressing the growing challenge of antifungal resistance in clinical settings.