Recombinant Lonomia obliqua Unknown protein 3

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Identification and Detection

Unknown Protein 3 was first detected in L. obliqua caterpillar bristle extract (LOCBE) through proteomic analyses. Key findings include:

  • Detection Methods: Identified via Edman sequencing and cDNA library screening in LOCBE proteome studies .

  • Spectral Counts: Shotgun proteomic analysis of L. obliqua hemolymph revealed 24 spectral counts for Unknown Protein 3 across multiple caterpillar colonies .

  • Localization: Found in hemolymph and tegument cryosecretions, suggesting a role in defense or venom activity .

Comparative Analysis with Known L. obliqua Proteins

ProteinFamily/ClassKey ActivitiesRecombinant Status
Unknown Protein 3UncharacterizedHypothesized cytoprotection Not reported
LopapLipocalinProthrombin activation, cytoprotection Recombinant (rLopap)
LosacHemolinFactor X activation, neuroprotection Recombinant (rLosac)

Research Gaps and Future Directions

  • Recombinant Expression: No studies describe the production or purification of recombinant Unknown Protein 3. Existing recombinant work focuses on Lopap and Losac .

  • Mechanistic Studies: Its interaction with coagulation factors or cell survival pathways remains unexplored.

  • Therapeutic Potential: Antiapoptotic effects observed in neuronal cells warrant further investigation .

Key Challenges

  • Database Limitations: L. obliqua protein sequences are underrepresented in public databases, complicating homology modeling .

  • Functional Annotation: Lack of structural data or conserved domains hinders functional predictions .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the in-stock format by default. If you have specific format requirements, please note them when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary by purchase method and location. Consult your local distributor for specific delivery times. All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. If dry ice is required, please contact us in advance for associated extra fees.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Working aliquots can be stored at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to collect contents at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) is recommended for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer components, storage temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form is generally stable for 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form is generally stable for 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during manufacturing. Please inform us if you require a specific tag, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
; Unknown protein 3; Fragments
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-18
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Lonomia obliqua (Moth)
Target Protein Sequence
YEYSVYREII GSGHIIAR
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What are the main recombinant proteins isolated from Lonomia obliqua and what are their primary functions?

Lonomia obliqua caterpillar venom has yielded several significant recombinant proteins with unique biological activities. The primary proteins that have been characterized include:

  • rLosac (recombinant Lonomia obliqua Stuart-factor activator): This protein functions as a factor X activator and demonstrates cytoprotective properties. Despite having no homology to known proteases, it can be inhibited by serine protease inhibitors like PMSF. Interestingly, it shows closer homology to the hemolin family of proteins, which are cell adhesion molecules .

  • rLopap (recombinant Lonomia obliqua prothrombin activator protease): This protein acts as a prothrombin activator and also exhibits cytoprotective properties, promoting cell survival and proliferation .

  • rAVLO (recombinant Antiviral protein of Lonomia obliqua): This protein demonstrates powerful antiviral activity, capable of reducing viral replication by up to 10^6 fold for herpes virus and 10^4 fold for rubella virus. It appears to be part of a novel protein family, as BLAST sequence searches have not revealed similar sequences in GenBank .

These proteins have been successfully produced in recombinant expression systems, particularly baculovirus/insect cell systems, facilitating their detailed study and potential therapeutic applications .

What evidence demonstrates the myogenic properties of rLosac and rLopap?

The myogenic properties of rLosac and rLopap have been established through multiple experimental approaches examining their effects on skeletal muscle cells. Key evidence includes:

  • Increased myoblast proliferation: Both rLosac and rLopap stimulate enhanced proliferation of C2C12 mouse myoblasts, a crucial first step in the muscle regeneration process .

  • Modulation of myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs): These proteins influence the expression and activity of MRFs, which are transcription factors that control the differentiation of myoblasts into functional muscle tissue .

  • Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) regulation: The recombinant proteins modulate PGE2 release, which plays a significant role in muscle regeneration processes .

  • EP4 receptor expression: Research has shown increased expression of the EP4 receptor in the proliferative phase of C2C12 cells after treatment with these proteins, suggesting this receptor mediates some of the effects of PGE2 in muscle cells .

  • Anti-inflammatory effects: Both proteins inhibit the release of inflammatory mediators like IL-6 and PGE2 that are typically induced by inflammatory stimuli such as IL-1β, supporting a dual role in both promoting proliferation and controlling inflammation during muscle repair .

These findings collectively demonstrate that rLosac and rLopap have significant potential for applications involving skeletal muscle regeneration and repair after injury .

How do the structural characteristics of rAVLO correlate with its antiviral activity?

The structural characteristics of rAVLO provide important insights into its potent antiviral activity. Bioinformatic analyses have revealed several key structural features:

The protein consists of 178 amino acids and demonstrates a predominantly globular conformation with no identified long regions of high disorder tendency (all positions show below 45% probability of disorder) . Structure prediction analyses indicate that rAVLO has an alpha-beta type secondary structure architecture, composed of approximately 37-40% alpha helix, 24-29% beta sheet, and 33-35% coil structures .

The N-terminal region contains at least two portions with high-confidence (>60%) helix structure: one between residues 1-15 and another between residues 79-95 . This suggests that these regions may be important for the protein's functional activity.

Notably, the protein contains a signal peptide, indicating it is secreted, and possesses the ability to bind to MHC class I molecules. Multiple protein binding sites with various HLA have been identified, suggesting potential immunomodulatory functions that may contribute to its antiviral properties .

The correlation between these structural features and antiviral activity likely involves:

  • The globular structure may facilitate interaction with virus particles or host cell receptors required for viral entry

  • The alpha-helical regions might be involved in protein-protein interactions critical for antiviral activity

  • The ability to bind MHC class I molecules suggests potential immunomodulatory effects that could enhance antiviral immune responses

Importantly, BLAST similarity searches for the corresponding cDNA did not reveal similar sequences in GenBank, suggesting that rAVLO belongs to a novel protein family . This unique structure may confer its broad-spectrum antiviral properties that are effective against diverse virus families, including herpes viruses and rubella virus.

What are the mechanisms through which rLosac and rLopap modulate inflammatory responses in muscle tissues?

The anti-inflammatory mechanisms of rLosac and rLopap in muscle tissues involve multiple interconnected pathways:

  • Inhibition of inflammatory cytokine production: Both recombinant proteins have been shown to inhibit the release of IL-6, a pro-inflammatory cytokine, when induced by inflammatory stimuli such as IL-1β . This suppression of cytokine production helps control excessive inflammatory responses that could impair muscle regeneration.

  • Modulation of prostaglandin pathways: rLosac and rLopap influence the expression of cyclooxygenases (COX-1 and COX-2) and the subsequent production of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) . PGE2 is a crucial mediator with both pro- and anti-inflammatory properties depending on concentration and receptor engagement.

  • Regulation of EP4 receptor expression: The proteins increase expression of the EP4 receptor in proliferating muscle cells . Activation of EP4 receptors by PGE2 typically promotes anti-inflammatory responses and supports tissue repair rather than destruction.

  • Cytoprotective activity: The inherent cytoprotective properties of these proteins help maintain cell viability during inflammatory stress, preserving the pool of myogenic cells necessary for effective regeneration .

  • Balance between proliferation and differentiation: By modulating myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs), these proteins help maintain the delicate balance between myoblast proliferation and differentiation that is often disrupted during inflammatory conditions .

These mechanisms collectively create an environment conducive to muscle regeneration by limiting excessive inflammation while promoting the proliferative and regenerative capacity of muscle precursor cells. This dual activity makes these proteins particularly promising for therapeutic applications in inflammatory muscle disorders and injury scenarios.

How does the sequence homology of rLosac compare to other known protease activators, and what implications does this have for its mechanism of action?

The sequence homology analysis of rLosac reveals intriguing characteristics that distinguish it from typical protease activators and inform its unique mechanism of action:

rLosac functions as a Stuart-factor (factor X) activator but shows no significant homology to known proteases, despite being inhibited by PMSF, a classic serine protease inhibitor . Instead, rLosac demonstrates closer homology to members of the hemolin family of proteins, which function primarily as cell adhesion molecules .

This unusual homology pattern suggests that rLosac may have evolved a novel mechanism for protease activation that differs from conventional protease activators. The implications of this unique evolutionary relationship include:

  • Multifunctional capacity: The hemolin-like structure may allow rLosac to function both as a protease activator and as a cell adhesion molecule, explaining its observed effects on cell proliferation and survival.

  • Novel catalytic mechanism: Despite lacking typical protease domains, rLosac can activate factor X, suggesting it may utilize an alternative mechanism for protease activation that could involve allosteric regulation or novel binding interactions.

  • Broader therapeutic potential: The dual properties of protease activation and cell adhesion molecule characteristics may underlie rLosac's ability to influence both coagulation pathways and cellular regenerative processes.

  • Distinct inhibition profile: While inhibited by PMSF, rLosac may show unique responses to other protease inhibitors compared to conventional proteases, which could be exploited for selective therapeutic targeting.

These distinctive homology characteristics suggest that rLosac represents a novel class of protease activators with mechanisms that bridge coagulation biology and cell adhesion functions. This unique evolutionary position may explain its multifaceted biological activities and supports its investigation as a therapeutic agent with mechanisms distinct from conventional protease-based drugs.

What expression systems have proven most effective for producing biologically active recombinant Lonomia obliqua proteins?

The baculovirus/insect cell expression system has emerged as the most effective platform for producing biologically active recombinant proteins from Lonomia obliqua. The evidence for this comes from multiple successful applications:

  • rAVLO production: This antiviral protein was successfully expressed in a baculovirus/Sf-9 insect cell system, yielding a functional protein capable of reducing viral replication by several orders of magnitude . The system preserved the protein's complex structural features, including its predominantly alpha-beta secondary structure.

  • rLosac and rLopap expression: These proteins have also been successfully produced in recombinant form while maintaining their biological activities, including effects on myoblast proliferation and modulation of inflammatory mediators .

  • Preservation of post-translational modifications: The insect cell system appears to maintain important post-translational modifications necessary for the proper folding and function of these complex venom-derived proteins.

The baculovirus/insect cell system offers several advantages for expressing Lonomia obliqua proteins:

  • Eukaryotic processing: Unlike bacterial systems, insect cells provide eukaryotic protein processing machinery.

  • High expression levels: The system typically yields high quantities of recombinant protein.

  • Proper folding: Complex disulfide bond formation and protein folding are better supported than in prokaryotic systems.

  • Scalability: The system can be scaled for larger production when needed for extended studies.

For researchers seeking to express these proteins, it's recommended to use established baculovirus vectors with Sf-9 or similar insect cell lines, and to include appropriate secretion signal sequences to facilitate protein recovery from the culture medium . Purification typically involves affinity chromatography steps, with care taken to preserve the protein's native conformation throughout the process.

What are the most reliable assays for measuring the antiviral activity of rAVLO against different viral pathogens?

Based on the research data, several complementary assays have proven reliable for measuring the antiviral activity of rAVLO against different viral pathogens:

  • Viral Replication Reduction Assays:

    • Cell culture infection models have demonstrated rAVLO's ability to reduce herpes virus replication by 10^6 fold and rubella virus by 10^4 fold .

    • The methodology involves treating cultured cells (such as Vero and SIRC cells) with the purified recombinant protein for 1 hour before viral infection, followed by serial dilutions of the virus (10^-1-10^-7 for rubella virus and 10^-5-10^-12 for herpes virus) .

    • Cells are then incubated for approximately 4 days before assessment of viral replication.

  • Molecular Quantification Methods:

    • RT-PCR of viral RNA from rAVLO-treated infected cells provides a molecular measure of inhibition rates .

    • This approach allows for precise quantification of viral genome copies, confirming the inhibition observed in cellular assays.

  • Complementary Validation Approaches:

    • Previous studies have shown that rAVLO can significantly reduce viral replication (10,000 times) of Picornavirus (EMC), demonstrating its broad-spectrum activity .

    • The combination of different viral families in testing (Herpesviridae, Togaviridae, and Picornaviridae) provides comprehensive validation of antiviral potency.

When implementing these assays, researchers should:

  • Include appropriate controls, such as empty bacmid clones (e.g., clone 5 as mentioned in the research)

  • Test multiple recombinant protein clones (e.g., clones 10, 16, and 23) to account for potential variation

  • Perform assays in duplicate or triplicate to ensure statistical reliability

  • Include dose-response experiments to determine minimum effective concentrations

  • Consider time-of-addition studies to elucidate the stage of viral replication targeted by rAVLO

These methodologies collectively provide a comprehensive assessment of rAVLO's antiviral properties and can be adapted for screening against other viral pathogens of interest.

What experimental designs best demonstrate the effects of rLosac and rLopap on myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) in muscle regeneration?

Based on the research data, optimal experimental designs for demonstrating the effects of rLosac and rLopap on myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) in muscle regeneration incorporate multiple complementary approaches:

  • In Vitro C2C12 Myoblast Model System:

    • Pre-treatment of C2C12 mouse myoblasts with purified rLosac and rLopap at various concentrations provides a controlled system to observe direct effects .

    • This model allows for temporal analysis of both proliferation and differentiation phases.

  • Comprehensive MRF Expression Analysis:

    • Quantification of key MRFs (MyoD, Myf5, myogenin, and MRF4) at both mRNA level (via RT-qPCR) and protein level (via Western blotting) .

    • Time-course experiments to track changes in MRF expression patterns during the transition from proliferation to differentiation stages.

  • Cell Proliferation Assessment:

    • Incorporation of proliferation assays (such as BrdU incorporation, Ki67 immunostaining, or MTT assays) to correlate MRF expression with myoblast proliferation rates .

  • PGE2 Production and Cyclooxygenase Expression Analysis:

    • Measurement of PGE2 production using enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to establish relationships between prostaglandin signaling and MRF expression .

    • Analysis of cyclooxygenase (COX-1 and COX-2) protein expression to determine the mechanisms by which these recombinant proteins might modulate inflammatory mediators that influence MRF activity .

  • EP4 Receptor Involvement:

    • Assessment of EP4 receptor expression during various phases of myoblast development to understand its role in mediating the effects of PGE2 on MRF expression .

    • Use of EP4 receptor antagonists to confirm the specificity of observed effects.

  • Inflammatory Challenge Model:

    • Incorporation of inflammatory stimuli (such as IL-1β) to assess how rLosac and rLopap modulate MRF expression under inflammatory conditions that typically impair muscle regeneration .

  • Differentiation Assessment:

    • Morphological evaluation of myotube formation through phase-contrast microscopy and immunofluorescence staining for muscle-specific markers (such as myosin heavy chain) .

    • Quantification of fusion index to measure the efficiency of myoblast differentiation and correlate it with MRF expression patterns.

This multi-faceted experimental approach provides comprehensive insights into how rLosac and rLopap influence the complex regulatory network governing muscle regeneration, establishing clear relationships between these proteins, inflammatory mediators, and the expression of key myogenic factors.

How might rAVLO be utilized in developing broad-spectrum antiviral therapeutics?

The development of rAVLO as a broad-spectrum antiviral therapeutic represents a promising research direction based on its remarkable properties. Several strategic approaches can be considered:

  • Drug Development Pipeline:

    • Preclinical characterization: Building on existing data showing inhibition of herpes virus (10^6-fold reduction), rubella virus (10^4-fold reduction), and Picornavirus replication, researchers should expand testing to other clinically relevant viral families .

    • Mechanism elucidation: Further investigation into rAVLO's precise antiviral mechanism is essential, particularly focusing on whether it acts by preventing viral entry, replication, assembly, or egress.

    • Formulation development: Different administration routes (intravenous, topical, intranasal) should be explored based on target viral infections.

  • Structural Optimization Strategies:

    • Structure-activity relationship studies: The protein's globular structure with alpha-beta architecture (37-40% alpha helix, 24-29% beta sheet, 33-35% coil) provides a foundation for identifying the minimal effective domain .

    • Peptide derivative development: Based on functional domains, smaller peptide derivatives could be designed with enhanced stability and delivery properties.

    • Protein engineering: Modifications to enhance stability, half-life, or target specificity could improve therapeutic potential.

  • Combination Therapy Approaches:

    • Synergy testing: Combinations with existing antivirals could reveal synergistic effects that allow lower dosing of both agents.

    • Immune modulation: Given rAVLO's predicted ability to bind MHC class I, its potential to enhance immune responses alongside direct antiviral effects warrants investigation .

  • Production Optimization:

    • Scale-up considerations: The established baculovirus/Sf-9 expression system provides a foundation for larger-scale production necessary for therapeutic development .

    • Quality control: Development of specific assays to ensure consistent biological activity across production batches.

  • Target Virus Selection Strategy:

    • Priority could be given to viruses lacking effective treatments or those prone to developing resistance to existing antivirals.

    • The broad-spectrum activity observed against diverse viral families (Herpesviridae, Togaviridae, Picornaviridae) suggests potential efficacy against emerging viral threats .

This multifaceted approach leverages rAVLO's unique properties as a novel antiviral agent, with particular emphasis on its potential as a broad-spectrum therapeutic for viruses that currently lack effective treatment options.

What potential applications exist for rLosac and rLopap in treating muscular dystrophies or other degenerative muscle conditions?

The unique properties of rLosac and rLopap present several promising potential applications for treating muscular dystrophies and other degenerative muscle conditions:

  • Enhanced Muscle Regeneration Therapy:

    • The demonstrated ability of both proteins to increase myoblast proliferation could help address the depleted satellite cell pool commonly observed in muscular dystrophies .

    • Their influence on myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) could help restore more normal patterns of muscle regeneration in conditions where this process is dysregulated.

  • Anti-inflammatory Intervention:

    • The capacity of rLosac and rLopap to inhibit inflammatory mediators like IL-6 and PGE2 when induced by IL-1β suggests potential for reducing the chronic inflammation that exacerbates muscle degeneration in various myopathies .

    • This anti-inflammatory effect, combined with pro-regenerative properties, represents a dual-action approach that could be particularly beneficial in conditions like Duchenne muscular dystrophy where inflammation accelerates disease progression.

  • Adjunctive Therapy for Cell-Based Approaches:

    • These proteins could be used to pre-condition muscle progenitor cells ex vivo before transplantation, potentially enhancing their proliferative and regenerative capacity.

    • Combination with stem cell therapies could improve engraftment and differentiation of transplanted cells in dystrophic muscles.

  • Targeting the PGE2-EP4 Pathway:

    • The observed increased expression of the EP4 receptor in proliferating myoblasts treated with these proteins suggests a specific pathway that could be therapeutically leveraged .

    • EP4 receptor modulation represents a potential target for enhancing the beneficial effects of these proteins in muscle regeneration.

  • Age-Related Sarcopenia Applications:

    • The proliferation-enhancing properties could potentially counteract the decline in muscle regenerative capacity observed in age-related sarcopenia.

    • Modulation of inflammatory processes could address the "inflammaging" component of sarcopenic muscle loss.

  • Post-Injury Muscle Rehabilitation:

    • Application during rehabilitation following acute muscle injuries could accelerate recovery and potentially improve the quality of regenerated muscle tissue.

    • The combination of anti-inflammatory and pro-regenerative properties makes these proteins particularly suitable for addressing both aspects of muscle injury recovery.

Implementation strategies could include local delivery systems such as injectable hydrogels, biomaterial scaffolds incorporating these proteins, or systemic administration approaches. Further research is necessary to optimize delivery methods, dosing regimens, and to evaluate potential long-term effects in the context of chronic muscle diseases.

How can researchers effectively isolate and characterize novel bioactive proteins from Lonomia obliqua for potential therapeutic applications?

A comprehensive methodological approach for isolating and characterizing novel bioactive proteins from Lonomia obliqua includes several integrated strategies:

  • Source Material Preparation:

    • Collection of specific tissues: Different venom structures (bristles, tegument) contain distinct protein profiles. Evidence shows successful cDNA library construction from both tegument and bristle structures .

    • Hemolymph collection: This fluid has demonstrated significant bioactive properties and serves as an important source for novel protein discovery .

    • Preservation protocols: Immediate preservation in RNA stabilization solutions for transcriptomics or protease inhibitor cocktails for proteomics is essential to maintain integrity.

  • Multi-Omics Discovery Approach:

    • Transcriptomics: Construction of cDNA libraries followed by high-throughput sequencing has proven successful, yielding databases of hundreds of contigs and singletons (538 for tegument, 368 for bristle libraries) .

    • Proteomics: Identification of the most abundant proteins in different tissues (bristle, tegument, hemolymph, and "cryosecretion") through N-terminal sequencing provides complementary data to transcriptomics .

    • Bioinformatics integration: Combining transcriptomic and proteomic data to identify novel protein candidates with no known homologs, as was the case with rAVLO .

  • Recombinant Expression Optimization:

    • Expression system selection: The baculovirus/insect cell system has demonstrated particular effectiveness for Lonomia obliqua proteins .

    • Clone selection: Testing multiple recombinant clones (e.g., clones 10, 16, 23 as with rAVLO) to identify those with optimal expression and activity .

    • Purification strategy: Development of protein-specific purification protocols that maintain structural integrity and biological activity.

  • Structural Characterization:

    • Bioinformatic prediction: Analysis of protein properties including disorder tendency, secondary structure composition, and potential binding sites provides initial structural insights .

    • Experimental validation: Confirmation of predicted structures through techniques such as circular dichroism, X-ray crystallography, or NMR spectroscopy.

    • Structure-function correlation: Relating structural features to observed biological activities to identify critical domains.

  • Functional Screening Cascade:

    • Cell-based assays: Testing for cytoprotective effects, proliferation enhancement, or antiviral properties using relevant cell lines (e.g., C2C12 myoblasts for muscle effects, Vero cells for antiviral activity) .

    • Molecular target identification: Determining specific receptors or pathways modulated by the novel proteins, such as the EP4 receptor involvement in myoblast responses .

    • Mechanism elucidation: Investigation of downstream signaling pathways and molecular interactions through techniques like RNA-seq, phosphoproteomics, or protein-protein interaction studies.

  • Therapeutic Potential Assessment:

    • Comparison with existing therapies: Benchmarking against established treatments for target conditions.

    • Safety profiling: Evaluation of potential immunogenicity, toxicity, or off-target effects.

    • Formulation development: Exploration of stabilization methods and delivery systems appropriate for the protein's properties and intended application.

This systematic approach has proven successful in identifying and characterizing several bioactive proteins from Lonomia obliqua with significant therapeutic potential, as evidenced by the development of rLosac, rLopap, and rAVLO .

What unresolved questions remain about the mechanisms of action for Lonomia obliqua recombinant proteins?

Despite significant progress in characterizing Lonomia obliqua recombinant proteins, several critical questions remain unresolved that warrant further investigation:

  • Receptor Binding and Signaling Mechanisms:

    • While increased EP4 receptor expression has been observed in myoblasts treated with rLosac and rLopap, the direct binding interactions and subsequent signaling cascades remain incompletely characterized .

    • For rAVLO, the predicted ability to bind MHC class I molecules suggests potential immunomodulatory functions, but the specific interactions and downstream effects require further elucidation .

  • Structural Determinants of Function:

    • For rLosac, the unusual combination of protease activation capability despite lacking homology to known proteases, coupled with similarity to hemolin family proteins, presents a mechanistic puzzle that remains unsolved .

    • The structure-activity relationships for all these proteins, particularly the identification of minimal functional domains, would enhance therapeutic development but are not yet fully mapped.

  • Antiviral Mechanism of rAVLO:

    • While the potent antiviral effects of rAVLO have been demonstrated against multiple viruses, the precise mechanism (inhibition of viral entry, replication, assembly, or egress) remains to be determined .

    • Whether rAVLO acts directly on viral components or modulates host cellular responses to infection is not fully established.

  • Long-term Effects and Safety Profile:

    • The long-term consequences of modulating myogenic regulatory factors and inflammatory mediators through rLosac and rLopap require further investigation to ensure safety for therapeutic applications .

    • Potential immunogenicity of these novel proteins in human applications needs thorough assessment.

  • Synergistic Interactions:

    • The potential for synergistic effects when combining different Lonomia obliqua proteins, or when using them in conjunction with existing therapeutics, represents an unexplored area with significant potential.

  • In Vivo Efficacy Translation:

    • While cell culture studies have shown promising results, the translation of these findings to in vivo models of muscle injury, dystrophy, or viral infection remains a critical knowledge gap.

    • Optimal delivery methods, dosing regimens, and pharmacokinetic profiles for in vivo applications are yet to be established.

  • Novel Protein Discovery:

    • Given that rAVLO represents a novel protein family with no known homologs in GenBank , there is likely additional unexplored protein diversity within Lonomia obliqua venom that could yield further therapeutic candidates.

Addressing these unresolved questions through targeted research would significantly advance the potential for translating these fascinating recombinant proteins into viable therapeutic applications.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.