The Recombinant Lysinibacillus sphaericus UPF0754 membrane protein Bsph_0374 is a protein derived from the bacterium Lysinibacillus sphaericus, specifically from the strain C3-41. This protein is produced using recombinant technology, where the gene encoding the protein is inserted into a host organism, such as yeast, to produce large quantities of the protein. The recombinant protein is used for various research and diagnostic applications.
Protein Name: UPF0754 membrane protein Bsph_0374
Species: Lysinibacillus sphaericus (strain C3-41)
Uniprot No.: B1HVI2
Expression Region: 1-380 amino acids
Purity: Greater than 85% as determined by SDS-PAGE
Source: Produced in yeast
Storage Buffer: Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol
Storage Conditions: Store at -20°C or -80°C for extended storage. Repeated freezing and thawing is not recommended .
| Characteristic | Description |
|---|---|
| Protein Name | UPF0754 membrane protein Bsph_0374 |
| Species | Lysinibacillus sphaericus (strain C3-41) |
| Uniprot No. | B1HVI2 |
| Expression Region | 1-380 amino acids |
| Purity | >85% (SDS-PAGE) |
| Source | Produced in yeast |
| Storage Buffer | Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol |
| Storage Conditions | -20°C or -80°C |
KEGG: lsp:Bsph_0374
STRING: 444177.Bsph_0374
Bsph_0374 is a UPF0754 membrane protein from Lysinibacillus sphaericus with a full amino acid sequence length of 380 residues (expression region 1-380) . The protein has a UniProt accession number of B1HVI2 and is classified as a membrane protein . Its amino acid sequence contains multiple hydrophobic regions consistent with membrane-spanning domains, including the N-terminal sequence "MDNFIVTLLFMAIIGAAIGGVTNHLAIK" which likely represents a transmembrane segment . For structural analysis, researchers should consider utilizing techniques like circular dichroism spectroscopy or X-ray crystallography to determine secondary and tertiary structural elements.
Lysinibacillus sphaericus (formerly classified as Bacillus sphaericus) is a Gram-positive, aerobic, spore-forming bacterium commonly isolated from soil environments . The bacterium is notable for producing mosquitocidal binary toxins (Bin toxins) that are deposited within a balloon-like exosporium during sporulation . L. sphaericus forms spores with distinctive structural properties, including an exosporium that differs from related Bacillus species. Understanding the biological context of L. sphaericus provides important background for researchers investigating membrane proteins like Bsph_0374 from this organism.
For maintaining optimal stability of recombinant Bsph_0374, the protein should be stored at -20°C in a Tris-based buffer containing 50% glycerol optimized for this specific protein . For extended storage periods, it is recommended to conserve the protein at -20°C or -80°C . Researchers should avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as this may compromise protein integrity. Working aliquots can be maintained at 4°C for up to one week to minimize degradation from repeated temperature changes . When designing experiments, consider performing stability tests under various storage conditions if extended work with the protein is planned.
Recombinant Bsph_0374 has been successfully expressed in E. coli expression systems with His-tag modifications . When designing an expression strategy, researchers should consider:
Vector selection: Vectors with strong promoters (T7, tac) generally work well for membrane protein expression
Host strain optimization: BL21(DE3), C41, or C43 strains often perform better for membrane proteins
Induction conditions: Lower temperatures (16-25°C) and reduced IPTG concentrations may improve folding
Membrane extraction techniques: Detergent screening to identify optimal solubilization conditions
For membrane proteins like Bsph_0374, expression level optimization requires balancing protein production with proper membrane insertion and folding. A systematic approach comparing different expression conditions would involve the following experimental design:
| Parameter | Test Condition 1 | Test Condition 2 | Test Condition 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature | 16°C | 25°C | 37°C |
| IPTG Concentration | 0.1 mM | 0.5 mM | 1.0 mM |
| Induction Time | 4 hours | 8 hours | Overnight |
| Host Strain | BL21(DE3) | C41(DE3) | Rosetta(DE3) |
Given that Bsph_0374 is available as a His-tagged recombinant protein , immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) represents the primary purification strategy. A comprehensive purification protocol should include:
Cell lysis optimization: Mechanical disruption methods (sonication, homogenization) combined with detergent solubilization
IMAC purification: Using Ni-NTA or Co-NTA resins with imidazole gradient elution
Secondary purification: Size exclusion chromatography to remove aggregates and achieve higher purity
Quality control: SDS-PAGE, Western blotting, and mass spectrometry to confirm identity and purity
For membrane proteins, detergent selection is critical. Researchers should test multiple detergents (DDM, LDAO, FC-12) for optimal solubilization while maintaining protein structure and function.
Determining the membrane topology of Bsph_0374 requires specialized techniques that identify which protein regions are exposed to different cellular compartments. An effective experimental approach would include:
Cysteine scanning mutagenesis: Introducing cysteine residues at various positions followed by accessibility labeling
Protease protection assays: Limited proteolysis of membrane-inserted protein to identify exposed regions
Fluorescence techniques: Fusion of GFP/mCherry at various positions to determine localization, similar to approaches used for other L. sphaericus proteins
Computational prediction validation: Comparing experimental results with predictions from algorithms like TMHMM or Phobius
For a comprehensive analysis, researchers could adapt the methodological approach used for other membrane proteins from L. sphaericus, as demonstrated in the case of BclS protein, where fusion protein visualization revealed dynamic localization patterns .
Conducting a comparative analysis of Bsph_0374 with other UPF0754 family proteins would involve:
Sequence alignment: Using tools like BLAST, ClustalW, or MUSCLE to identify conserved regions
Phylogenetic analysis: Constructing trees to understand evolutionary relationships
Domain structure comparison: Identifying functional motifs or domains shared among family members
Structural modeling: Generating homology models based on related proteins with known structures
Researchers should note that UPF (Uncharacterized Protein Family) designations indicate limited functional characterization. Therefore, comparative genomic approaches and structure-function studies are particularly valuable for these protein families.
While specific functional data for Bsph_0374 is limited in the available research, the following hypotheses can be generated based on its classification as a membrane protein:
Cell envelope integrity: Membrane proteins often contribute to maintaining cellular structure
Transport functions: Potential involvement in nutrient uptake or waste export
Signal transduction: Possible role in sensing environmental conditions
Spore formation: Given L. sphaericus' spore-forming nature, potential involvement in sporulation processes similar to other membrane proteins in this organism
To investigate these potential functions, researchers could design knockout experiments using techniques similar to those described for other L. sphaericus proteins, such as the allele replacement methodology used for BclS studies . Phenotypic analyses examining growth rates, membrane integrity, stress responses, and sporulation efficiency would provide insights into the protein's functional role.
To identify protein-protein interactions involving Bsph_0374, researchers should consider:
Co-immunoprecipitation assays: Using anti-His antibodies to pull down Bsph_0374 complexes
Bacterial two-hybrid systems: Testing specific interaction partners
Cross-linking studies: Chemical cross-linking followed by mass spectrometry
Proximity labeling: BioID or APEX2 fusion proteins to identify neighboring proteins
When analyzing potential interacting partners, researchers should systematically assess both direct physical interactions and functional associations. Interaction data could be organized as follows:
| Technique | Potential Interacting Proteins | Interaction Strength | Validation Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co-IP | Protein X | Strong | Western blot |
| B2H | Protein Y | Moderate | β-galactosidase assay |
| Cross-linking | Protein Z | Weak | MS/MS identification |
Membrane proteins like Bsph_0374 can be studied using various membrane technology approaches. These methodologies can be classified based on their molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) and membrane characteristics:
| Membrane Process | MWCO (kilo Dalton) | Retained Diameters (μm) | Pressure Required (bar) | Membrane Type | Average Permeability (L/m²h·bar) | Applications for Protein Research |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MF | 100–500 | 10⁻¹–10 | 1–3 | Porous, asymmetric or symmetric | 500 | Initial purification, cell debris removal |
| UF | 20–150 | 10⁻³–1 | 2–5 | Micro porous, asymmetric | 150 | Protein concentration, buffer exchange |
| NF | 2–20 | 10⁻³–10⁻² | 5–15 | Tight porous, asymmetric, thin film composite | 10–20 | Separation of smaller proteins and peptides |
| RO | 0.2–2 | - | Higher | Semi porous, asymmetric, thin film composite | Lower | Final purification stages |
These membrane technologies can be applied to:
Concentrate dilute protein solutions
Exchange buffers for functional assays
Remove contaminants based on size differences
To investigate the temperature sensitivity of Bsph_0374, researchers can adapt protocols similar to those used for studying L. sphaericus spore heat resistance . A comprehensive experimental design would include:
Sample preparation: Purified Bsph_0374 in appropriate buffer systems
Temperature range testing: Systematic exposure to temperatures from 4°C to 80°C
Duration variables: Short (minutes) and extended (hours) exposure times
Analytical methods: Circular dichroism to monitor secondary structure changes, activity assays to assess functional preservation
Experimental data should be organized in clear tables following scientific data presentation guidelines:
| Temperature (°C) | Exposure Time (min) | Remaining Activity (%) | Secondary Structure Retention (%) | Aggregation Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 60 | 100 | 100 | 0.05 |
| 25 | 60 | 95 | 98 | 0.08 |
| 37 | 60 | 85 | 90 | 0.15 |
| 50 | 60 | 60 | 75 | 0.35 |
| 65 | 60 | 30 | 45 | 0.65 |
| 80 | 60 | 5 | 20 | 0.90 |
These data points would provide valuable insights into protein stability thresholds for experimental design .
To investigate the physiological role of Bsph_0374, researchers could employ gene deletion strategies similar to those used for other L. sphaericus proteins . A comprehensive approach would include:
Gene knockout construction: Using allele replacement methods with kanamycin resistance markers
Complementation studies: Reintroducing the native gene to confirm phenotype restoration
Phenotypic characterization:
Growth curves under various conditions
Membrane integrity assays
Stress resistance testing
Sporulation efficiency assessment
For spore-related phenotypes, researchers could adapt protocols used for BclS studies, including microscopy techniques, heat resistance measurements, and germination rate determination . The methodological approach should include appropriate controls and multiple biological replicates to ensure reproducibility.
When faced with contradictory results in Bsph_0374 studies, researchers should:
Examine methodological differences: Variations in protein preparation, buffer conditions, or analytical techniques
Consider post-translational modifications: Differences in expression systems may affect protein modifications
Evaluate protein conformational states: Membrane proteins often exist in multiple conformations affecting function
Assess experimental conditions: pH, temperature, salt concentration, and detergent effects
A systematic approach to resolving contradictions involves comparative experiments under standardized conditions, using multiple analytical techniques to corroborate findings. Researchers should maintain detailed records of all experimental variables to facilitate troubleshooting.
Membrane protein research, including work with Bsph_0374, presents several challenges:
Expression obstacles:
Low expression yields due to cytotoxicity
Inclusion body formation requiring refolding
Membrane insertion efficiency limitations
Purification difficulties:
Detergent selection affecting stability and function
Protein aggregation during concentration
Lipid requirements for structural integrity
Structural analysis limitations:
Challenges in obtaining diffraction-quality crystals
Detergent micelle interference in structural studies
Dynamic conformational changes difficult to capture
For each challenge, researchers should implement mitigation strategies such as screening multiple expression conditions, testing various detergents, and employing complementary structural analysis techniques. Documentation of successful approaches in laboratory notebooks will benefit future studies.
Given the current state of knowledge about Bsph_0374, several promising research directions emerge:
Structural characterization: Determining high-resolution structures using cryo-EM or X-ray crystallography
Functional annotation: Identifying biochemical activities and physiological roles
Interactome mapping: Characterizing the protein interaction network
Evolutionary analysis: Understanding conservation patterns across bacterial species
Applied research: Exploring potential biotechnological applications based on functional properties
Researchers entering this field should consider interdisciplinary approaches combining genomics, proteomics, structural biology, and microbial physiology to develop a comprehensive understanding of this uncharacterized membrane protein.
To advance knowledge of the UPF0754 protein family:
Develop standardized protocols for expression and purification
Create a database of characterized family members and their properties
Establish collaborative networks to share resources and expertise
Apply systems biology approaches to identify functional networks
Utilize comparative genomics to predict functional roles