Gene Name: atpB (synonyms: MCCL_1762, ATP synthase F0 sector subunit a) .
Amino Acid Sequence: Comprises 240 residues with a conserved transmembrane domain critical for proton channeling . Key residues include histidine and aromatic amino acids essential for structural stability.
Produced in E. coli with an N-terminal His tag for purification .
Available as a lyophilized powder in Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% trehalose (pH 8.0) .
ATP Synthase Mechanism: Shares rotational coupling mechanisms with Paracoccus denitrificans F1-ATPase, though M. caseolyticus lacks regulatory subunits like the ζ-protein found in alphaproteobacteria .
Antimicrobial Resistance Context: M. caseolyticus harbors plasmids carrying mecB (methicillin resistance gene), but atpB itself is not directly linked to resistance pathways .
Phylogenetic analysis places M. caseolyticus within a distinct clade among Macrococcus species, with high conservation of atpB across strains .
ANI Values: <95% similarity with M. caseolyticus subsp. hominis, highlighting evolutionary divergence .
Enzyme Kinetics: Used to study proton-driven ATP synthesis in Gram-positive bacteria .
Structural Biology: Serves as a model for cryo-EM studies due to its stability in detergent solutions .
Antimicrobial Target Screening: Potential candidate for inhibitors targeting bacterial ATP synthases .
KEGG: mcl:MCCL_1762
STRING: 458233.MCCL_1762
Macrococcus caseolyticus atpB shares structural similarities with ATP synthase subunits from other bacterial species but possesses distinct sequence characteristics. Comparative genomic analyses reveal that M. caseolyticus atpB shares limited sequence homology with those found in Staphylococcus species, with which Macrococcus is phylogenetically related .
Unlike some bacterial ATP synthases that function primarily in ATP synthesis, M. caseolyticus ATP synthase may exhibit adaptations related to its ecological niche. Genomic characterization demonstrates that Macrococcus species, including M. caseolyticus, have evolved specific adaptations that may influence ATP synthase function in various environmental conditions .
Recombinant M. caseolyticus atpB is typically expressed in Escherichia coli expression systems. According to product information, the full-length protein (amino acids 1-240) is expressed with an N-terminal His-tag to facilitate purification . The expression vector design includes:
Codon optimization for E. coli expression
N-terminal His-tag fusion for affinity purification
Use of appropriate promoter systems (typically T7 or similar inducible promoters)
Expression conditions optimized for membrane protein production
The resulting recombinant protein can be purified using nickel affinity chromatography and is typically provided as a lyophilized powder with greater than 90% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE .
For optimal stability and activity, recombinant M. caseolyticus atpB should be handled according to these guidelines:
| Storage Condition | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Long-term storage | -20°C to -80°C |
| Working aliquots | 4°C for up to one week |
| Storage buffer | Tris-based buffer, pH 8.0, containing 6% trehalose or 50% glycerol |
| Reconstitution | Deionized sterile water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL |
To prevent protein degradation:
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) when preparing aliquots
Briefly centrifuge vials before opening to bring contents to the bottom
Researchers can assess the activity of recombinant M. caseolyticus atpB using several complementary approaches:
ATP Hydrolysis Assay: Since atpB is part of ATP synthase, ATP hydrolysis activity can be measured indirectly. This is particularly relevant for ATP synthase components like GisA that contain ATP-binding cassette domains .
Proteoliposome Reconstitution: For functional studies, the protein can be reconstituted into proteoliposomes to assess proton translocation activity:
Incorporate purified atpB into liposomes
Use pH-sensitive fluorescent dyes to monitor proton movement
Measure changes in fluorescence upon addition of ATP
Binding Studies with Other ATP Synthase Subunits: Using techniques such as:
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR)
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC)
Co-immunoprecipitation assays
Structural Analysis: Employ circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to confirm proper folding of the recombinant protein, particularly important for membrane proteins with significant α-helical content .
Purification of M. caseolyticus atpB presents several challenges typical of membrane proteins:
Challenges and Solutions:
Limited Solubility:
Incorporate detergents during extraction (e.g., n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside or CHAPS)
Use mild solubilization conditions to maintain native structure
Consider surfactant screening to identify optimal solubilization conditions
Protein Aggregation:
Add stabilizing agents like glycerol or trehalose to purification buffers
Maintain low protein concentrations during purification steps
Consider purification at lower temperatures (4°C)
Maintaining Functional Conformation:
Use lipid-detergent mixtures to provide a native-like environment
Avoid harsh elution conditions during affinity chromatography
Consider on-column refolding techniques if necessary
Yield Optimization:
Investigating M. caseolyticus atpB's role in energy metabolism requires multiple experimental approaches:
Gene Deletion/Complementation Studies:
Generate atpB deletion mutants in M. caseolyticus
Complement with wild-type and mutant versions of the gene
Assess growth phenotypes under various energy-limiting conditions
Metabolic Flux Analysis:
Use isotope-labeled substrates to track metabolic pathways
Compare wild-type and atpB-modified strains
Quantify changes in ATP production and proton motive force
Membrane Potential Measurements:
Employ fluorescent probes (e.g., DiSC3(5)) to measure membrane potential
Compare effects of atpB variants on proton gradient maintenance
Assess response to metabolic inhibitors and changing environmental conditions
Proteomics Approach:
While specific inhibitors for M. caseolyticus ATP synthase have not been extensively characterized, research on ATP synthase inhibitors in related organisms provides valuable insights:
Classes of ATP Synthase Inhibitors applicable to research:
α-Helical basic peptide inhibitors (e.g., IF1, melittin, Syn-A2, Syn-C)
Oligomycin and derivatives (target the OSCP subunit)
Tentoxin (uncompetitive inhibitor in some species)
R207910 (developed for tuberculosis treatment)
Bz-423 (binds to OSCP)
Research Applications:
Use as tools to probe ATP synthase function in M. caseolyticus
Investigate species-specific differences in inhibitor sensitivity
Develop screening assays for novel inhibitors
Study structure-function relationships through inhibitor binding studies
Experimental Design Considerations:
Investigating the role of M. caseolyticus atpB in antimicrobial resistance requires:
Expression Analysis Under Antibiotic Stress:
Monitor atpB expression levels in response to different antibiotics
Compare expression patterns between resistant and susceptible strains
Correlate expression changes with metabolic adaptations
Genetic Association Studies:
Functional Characterization:
Generate atpB mutants with altered expression or activity
Assess changes in minimum inhibitory concentrations for various antibiotics
Evaluate effects on bacterial fitness and virulence
Structural Biology Approach:
Studying membrane topology and insertion of M. caseolyticus atpB requires specialized techniques:
Cysteine Scanning Mutagenesis:
Systematically replace residues with cysteine throughout the protein
Use membrane-impermeable sulfhydryl reagents to identify exposed residues
Map topology based on accessibility patterns
Protease Protection Assays:
Express atpB in membrane vesicles
Treat with proteases that cannot cross membranes
Analyze protected fragments to determine topology
Fluorescence-Based Approaches:
Create GFP fusion proteins at various positions
Assess fluorescence quenching in different environments
Use FRET techniques to measure distances between protein regions
Cryo-Electron Microscopy:
Research on bacterial ATP synthase components provides valuable insights into mitochondrial diseases through evolutionary conservation:
Comparative Structural Biology:
Bacterial ATP synthase serves as a model for human mitochondrial ATP synthase
Structural similarities allow parallel investigation of disease-causing mutations
Recombinant bacterial components enable functional studies difficult to perform with mitochondrial proteins
Disease Mechanism Investigation:
Several mitochondrial diseases involve ATP synthase dysfunction:
Neuropathy, ataxia, retinitis pigmentosa syndrome
Familial bilateral striatal necrosis
Batten's disease/neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses
Alzheimer's disease (linked to ATP synthase β subunit deficiency)
Methodological Advantages:
Bacterial systems allow high-yield protein production
Site-directed mutagenesis can mimic disease-associated variants
In vitro reconstitution enables isolated functional studies
Therapeutic Development Insights:
The potential role of M. caseolyticus atpB in pathogenesis and host interactions can be investigated through:
Cell Surface Expression Analysis:
Host Immune Response Studies:
Virulence Association Studies:
Metabolic Adaptation to Host:
Poor expression yield of recombinant M. caseolyticus atpB can be addressed through multiple strategies:
Expression System Optimization:
| Strategy | Implementation |
|---|---|
| Strain selection | Test BL21(DE3), C41(DE3), C43(DE3), Rosetta, or SHuffle strains |
| Vector design | Optimize codon usage for E. coli, consider using pET or pBAD systems |
| Fusion partners | Test MBP, SUMO, or GST fusions to enhance solubility |
| Induction conditions | Lower temperature (16-18°C), reduce IPTG concentration (0.1-0.5 mM), extend induction time |
Protein Solubilization Approaches:
Co-express with chaperones (GroEL/GroES, DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE)
Add membrane-mimicking components to lysis buffer
Test different detergents for protein extraction (DDM, LDAO, CHAPS)
Consider cell-free expression systems for membrane proteins
Culture Condition Modifications:
Validating proper folding and functionality of recombinant M. caseolyticus atpB requires multiple complementary approaches:
Structural Analysis Methods:
Circular Dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to assess secondary structure content
Fluorescence spectroscopy to evaluate tertiary structure
Limited proteolysis to confirm compact folding
Size exclusion chromatography to detect aggregation states
Functional Assays:
Proton translocation using pH-sensitive fluorescent dyes
ATP hydrolysis activity in reconstituted systems
Binding assays with other ATP synthase components
Inhibitor sensitivity profiling compared to native protein
Biophysical Characterization:
When designing site-directed mutagenesis experiments for M. caseolyticus atpB, researchers should consider:
Target Selection Based on Structural Information:
Focus on conserved residues identified through sequence alignments
Target transmembrane regions involved in proton translocation
Consider residues at interfaces with other ATP synthase subunits
Examine sites corresponding to disease-associated mutations in homologous proteins
Mutation Type Selection:
Conservative substitutions to probe specific interactions
Alanine scanning to identify essential residues
Charge reversal mutations to test electrostatic interactions
Cysteine substitutions for accessibility studies and crosslinking
Experimental Controls:
Include wild-type protein in all experiments
Create both loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations
Generate mutations in non-critical regions as negative controls
Consider introducing equivalent mutations from other species to test conservation of function
Functional Impact Assessment:
Comparative analysis of ATP synthase function between M. caseolyticus and Staphylococcus species reveals:
Evolutionary Divergence:
Genomic characterization shows that while M. caseolyticus is related to Staphylococcus, it has distinct genetic characteristics
ATP synthase components may have evolved different regulatory mechanisms reflecting adaptation to different ecological niches
Genus-wide genomic analysis reveals 15 genomospecies within Macrococcus, suggesting potential functional diversity in ATP synthase across the genus
Metabolic Integration:
M. caseolyticus demonstrates distinctive proteolytic and lipolytic capabilities compared to Staphylococcus
These metabolic differences likely influence energy requirements and ATP synthase regulation
Cell envelope proteinase (CEP) activity levels in M. caseolyticus may correlate with ATP synthase function in nutrient acquisition and utilization
Experimental Approaches to Compare Function:
ATP synthase plays a crucial role in M. caseolyticus adaptation to environmental conditions:
pH Adaptation Mechanisms:
ATP synthase functions in maintaining intracellular pH homeostasis
Expression and activity may be modulated in response to environmental pH changes
Proton pumping activity helps maintain membrane potential under stress conditions
Nutrient Availability Response:
Temperature Adaptation:
ATP synthase structure and function may be optimized for the temperature range encountered in host environments
Expression levels may change in response to temperature shifts
Membrane fluidity changes at different temperatures affect ATP synthase activity
Experimental Designs to Study Environmental Adaptation: