ATP synthase subunit beta (atpD) encodes the β-subunit of the F-type ATP synthase, a critical enzyme in oxidative phosphorylation. This subunit is part of the FF ATP synthase complex, which catalyzes ATP synthesis using a proton gradient . In Macrococcus caseolyticus, atpD is highly conserved, making it a valuable target for phylogenetic studies, diagnostic applications, and biotechnological innovations .
The atpD gene in M. caseolyticus is located on its 2.1 Mb chromosome, which encodes 1,957 open reading frames (ORFs) . The genome includes oxidative phosphorylation machinery closely related to Bacillaceae, with atpD forming part of the FF ATP synthase operon .
| Feature | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Chromosome Size | 2,102,324 bp | |
| GC Content | 36.9% | |
| Plasmids | 8 (pMCCL1–8) | |
| atpD Conservation | Highly conserved |
The β-subunit (AtpD) is integral to ATP synthase activity, facilitating ATP synthesis through conformational changes during proton translocation . Key functional attributes include:
Catalytic Activity: Direct involvement in ATP hydrolysis and synthesis .
Conservation: Shares homology with catalytic subunits of V-type ATPases, enabling cross-species phylogenetic comparisons .
Diagnostic Utility: Used to design universal primers and probes for bacterial identification .
Recombinant AtpD is produced by amplifying atpD from M. caseolyticus genomic DNA using primers listed in Annex II of patent EP2322667A2 (e.g., SEQ ID NOs. for amplification) . The gene is typically expressed in heterologous systems like Escherichia coli for functional studies.
| Primer Pair | Sequence (5’→3’) | Target Region |
|---|---|---|
| Forward | [Conserved region] | atpD |
| Reverse | [Variable region] | atpD |
Diagnostics: Probes targeting atpD enable species-specific detection of M. caseolyticus in food and clinical samples .
Drug Development: AtpD’s role in energy metabolism makes it a potential target for antimicrobial agents .
Vaccine Design: Surface-exposed regions of AtpD may serve as antigens .
atpD sequences from M. caseolyticus align closely with those of Staphylococcus and Bacillus, supporting its use in evolutionary analyses .
While M. caseolyticus is not a human pathogen, its genomic islands (e.g., McRI-1) carry genes like mecD (methicillin resistance) . Although atpD itself is not linked to resistance, its conserved nature aids in tracking horizontal gene transfer events .
| Island | Size (bp) | Key Genes | Function |
|---|---|---|---|
| McRI-1 | 18,134 | mecD, int | Methicillin resistance |
| McRI-mecD-2 | 16,188 | mecD, mvirE | Resistance and virulence |
Expression Optimization: Enhancing recombinant AtpD yields in E. coli requires codon optimization and promoter engineering .
Structural Studies: Cryo-EM or X-ray crystallography could elucidate AtpD’s role in ATP synthase mechanics .
Ecological Impact: Monitoring atpD conservation in fermented foods where M. caseolyticus is a starter culture .
KEGG: mcl:MCCL_1757
STRING: 458233.MCCL_1757
Macrococcus caseolyticus is a Gram-positive, coagulase-negative bacterial species belonging to the family Staphylococcaceae. The genus Macrococcus was first described in 1998 when it was differentiated from Staphylococcus . M. caseolyticus has been isolated from various sources including dairy products, animal skin, and meat. While generally considered less pathogenic than Staphylococcus species, M. caseolyticus has been documented in animal infections including bovine mastitis .
The species has gained significant research interest as a potential reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes, notably the methicillin resistance determinants mecB and mecD, which could potentially transfer to more pathogenic staphylococci . Genome analysis has revealed that these resistance determinants are present in diverse bacterial populations and are widely spread geographically .
ATP synthase subunit beta (atpD) is a critical component of the F1 portion of the F1F0-ATP synthase complex, which is responsible for ATP production during oxidative phosphorylation. The beta subunit contains the catalytic sites for ATP synthesis and hydrolysis, making it essential for energy metabolism in bacteria.
This protein plays a fundamental role in energy conservation by coupling the proton motive force to ATP synthesis. The atpD gene is considered a housekeeping gene due to its essential function and has been used as a phylogenetic marker for bacterial classification and identification within the Staphylococcaceae family, which includes both Macrococcus and Staphylococcus genera.
Researchers express recombinant ATP synthase components for several methodological advantages:
Controlled expression: Recombinant systems allow precise control over protein expression levels
Scalability: Higher yields can be achieved compared to native purification
Genetic manipulation: Site-directed mutagenesis can be performed to study structure-function relationships
Addition of tags: Affinity tags can be incorporated for easier purification and detection
Homogeneity: Pure protein preparations can be obtained without contamination from other ATP synthase subunits
For M. caseolyticus specifically, recombinant expression is practical since this bacterium is not as routinely cultured as model organisms like E. coli, and specialized growth conditions might be required for optimal native protein production.
The atpD gene serves as an excellent phylogenetic marker due to several characteristics:
It is a housekeeping gene with essential function, resulting in evolutionary conservation
It contains both conserved regions (useful for primer design) and variable regions (useful for species discrimination)
It is typically present as a single copy in bacterial genomes, avoiding paralog complications
It evolves at a moderate rate, allowing resolution of both recent and ancient divergences
Studies of methicillin-resistant Macrococcus isolates have used genetic markers to understand the epidemiology and evolutionary relationships between strains . Similar approaches with atpD can help track the spread of specific lineages and potentially correlate genetic traits with antibiotic resistance patterns or virulence factors.
Based on successful expression of other M. caseolyticus proteins, the following systems have proven effective:
For M. caseolyticus OleT MC expression, researchers have successfully used E. coli BL21(DE3) with the pNN33 plasmid, achieving sufficient expression for both in vivo activity and in vitro enzyme characterization .
M. caseolyticus harbors important antibiotic resistance determinants, particularly mecB and mecD genes that confer methicillin resistance . These resistance mechanisms could potentially affect ATP synthase function through:
Increased energy demand to power antibiotic efflux pumps, creating selective pressure for more efficient ATP synthase variants
Alterations in membrane potential due to resistance mechanisms, indirectly affecting ATP synthase efficiency
Co-regulation of energy metabolism genes with resistance determinants
Adaptations in ATP synthase to function optimally under antibiotic stress conditions
Genome analysis has revealed diverse methicillin-resistant M. caseolyticus populations with both mecB and mecD genes . Understanding how these resistance determinants interact with energy metabolism could provide insights into bacterial adaptation and potential targets for overcoming resistance.
Expressing functional recombinant ATP synthase subunits presents several challenges:
Maintaining proper folding and conformation, crucial for catalytic function
Ensuring proper assembly with other subunits if studying the entire complex
Potential toxicity to host cells when overexpressed
Challenges in solubility, as membrane-associated proteins can form inclusion bodies
Post-translational modifications that may differ between the native organism and expression host
Similar challenges have been observed with other M. caseolyticus proteins. For example, researchers working with OleT MC encountered electron transfer limitations that were overcome by introducing a two-component redox system (CamA/CamB) . This approach increased terminal alkene production in recombinant E. coli from 21.92 mg/L to higher levels, demonstrating the importance of addressing cofactor requirements in heterologous expression systems .
Differentiating ATP synthase activity from other ATPases requires specific experimental approaches:
| Differentiation Method | Technical Approach | Measurement Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Inhibitor sensitivity | Use of oligomycin or DCCD (specific ATP synthase inhibitors) | ATP synthase activity is selectively inhibited |
| Proton gradient dependence | Measurement of activity with/without protonophores | ATP synthase activity is dependent on proton gradient |
| Reconstitution studies | Incorporation into liposomes with proton gradient | Only ATP synthase can couple proton flow to ATP synthesis |
| Subunit-specific antibodies | Immunoprecipitation before activity assays | Selective removal of ATP synthase activity |
| F1 versus F0F1 activity | Comparison of soluble F1 with membrane-bound F0F1 | Different kinetic properties and inhibitor sensitivities |
These approaches can provide conclusive evidence that the observed activity is specifically from the ATP synthase complex rather than contaminating ATPases.
Comparative genomics studies of Macrococcus and Staphylococcus have revealed important insights about gene evolution and horizontal gene transfer between these genera:
Chromosomal resistance islands containing mecD have been identified in M. caseolyticus
Novel macrolide resistance genes mef(D) and msr(F) have been found on mobile genetic elements in both Macrococcus and Staphylococcus species
Similar genetic elements have been detected in M. canis, M. caseolyticus, and S. aureus, suggesting potential for inter-genus horizontal gene transfer
While these studies focus on antibiotic resistance genes, similar comparative approaches can be applied to atpD to understand its evolution. Of particular interest would be whether atpD shows evidence of selection pressure in antibiotic-resistant strains, potentially indicating adaptation of energy metabolism to support resistance mechanisms.
Based on successful expression of other M. caseolyticus proteins, the following conditions are recommended:
| Parameter | Recommended Conditions | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Expression vector | pET system with T7 promoter | Provides tight regulation and high expression |
| Host strain | E. coli BL21(DE3) or derivatives | Lacks key proteases, good for recombinant expression |
| Induction conditions | 0.1-0.5 mM IPTG, 16-25°C | Lower temperatures improve protein folding |
| Media | Terrific Broth or auto-induction media | Supports higher cell density and protein yield |
| Growth phase | Induction at OD600 0.6-0.8 | Mid-log phase optimizes expression |
| Expression duration | 16-24 hours at lower temperatures | Extended time compensates for slower expression |
| Additives | 5-10% glycerol, 0.5-1% glucose | Improves solubility, reduces basal expression |
This approach has been successful for expressing the OleT MC enzyme from M. caseolyticus, which showed good activity in both in vitro and in vivo settings .
To maintain the native conformation of atpD during purification:
Cell lysis: Use gentle methods like enzymatic lysis or controlled sonication
Buffer composition:
pH 7.0-8.0 (physiological range)
20-50 mM Tris-HCl or phosphate buffer
100-300 mM NaCl for ionic strength
10% glycerol as stabilizer
1-5 mM MgCl2 (cofactor for ATP binding)
1-2 mM DTT or β-mercaptoethanol as reducing agent
Chromatography sequence:
IMAC (immobilized metal affinity chromatography) for His-tagged protein
Ion exchange chromatography for further purification
Size exclusion chromatography as final polishing step
Activity preservation:
Add 0.1-0.5 mM ATP or non-hydrolyzable ATP analogs to stabilize conformation
Perform all steps at 4°C
Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
Several assays can be employed to assess the functionality of recombinant atpD:
| Assay Type | Methodology | Measured Parameter |
|---|---|---|
| ATP hydrolysis | Malachite green phosphate detection | Inorganic phosphate release rate |
| Coupled enzyme assay | PK/LDH system monitoring NADH oxidation | ATPase activity in real-time |
| Nucleotide binding | Isothermal titration calorimetry | Binding affinity (Kd) for ATP/ADP |
| Structural integrity | Circular dichroism spectroscopy | Secondary structure content |
| Thermal stability | Differential scanning fluorimetry | Melting temperature (Tm) |
| Subunit assembly | Native PAGE or analytical ultracentrifugation | Complex formation ability |
For comprehensive characterization, a combination of these assays should be employed to assess both the structural integrity and catalytic function of the recombinant protein.
When facing low expression yields, researchers can implement the following troubleshooting strategies:
Genetic optimization:
Codon optimization for E. coli expression
Use of different promoters (T7, tac, or arabinose-inducible)
Inclusion of ribosome binding site optimization
Host strain selection:
Test specialized strains (C41/C43 for membrane proteins)
Use Rosetta strains providing rare tRNAs
Consider BL21(DE3)pLysS to reduce basal expression
Expression conditions:
Lower induction temperature (16°C)
Reduce IPTG concentration (0.1 mM)
Extended expression time (overnight)
Protein engineering:
N- or C-terminal fusion partners (MBP, SUMO, TrxA)
Truncation constructs removing problematic domains
Addition of stabilizing mutations
Researchers working with the OleT MC enzyme from M. caseolyticus found that addressing electron transfer limitations by co-expressing a two-component redox system (CamA/CamB) significantly improved functional protein activity , highlighting the importance of considering cofactor requirements.
To identify and characterize interaction partners of atpD in the ATP synthase complex:
| Technique | Application | Outcome Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Bacterial two-hybrid | In vivo interaction screening | Binary interaction detection |
| Co-immunoprecipitation | Pull-down of interacting partners | Complex composition analysis |
| Surface plasmon resonance | Real-time binding kinetics | Association/dissociation rates |
| Cross-linking mass spectrometry | Interaction interface mapping | Amino acid-level contact sites |
| Cryo-electron microscopy | Structural analysis of complexes | 3D structure of assembled complex |
| Hydrogen-deuterium exchange MS | Conformational dynamics | Protection patterns at interfaces |
| FRET or BRET assays | Real-time interaction monitoring | Spatial proximity measurements |
These techniques can provide complementary information about the assembly, stoichiometry, and dynamics of the ATP synthase complex, particularly how the beta subunit interacts with other components.
ATP synthase represents a promising antimicrobial target due to its essential role in bacterial metabolism:
Target validation approaches:
Conditional knockout studies to confirm essentiality
Determination of structure-activity relationships
Screening for subunit-specific inhibitors
Advantages as an antimicrobial target:
Essential for bacterial survival
Structurally distinct from mammalian counterparts
Located in bacterial membrane, accessible to drugs
Well-characterized biochemistry
Drug discovery strategies:
High-throughput screening against recombinant atpD
Structure-based drug design targeting catalytic sites
Fragment-based lead discovery
Repurposing of known ATP synthase inhibitors
Understanding the unique structural features of M. caseolyticus atpD could enable the development of species-specific inhibitors with potential applications in treating resistant infections.
Engineered ATP synthase components have several biotechnological applications:
| Application | Engineering Approach | Potential Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Biosensors | ATP/ADP sensing elements | Detection of metabolic activities |
| Bioenergetic engineering | Enhanced ATP synthesis efficiency | Improved biofuel production |
| Nanomotors | Immobilized F1 on surfaces | Molecular machines for nanotechnology |
| Drug delivery | ATP-responsive nanocarriers | Controlled release mechanisms |
| Biocomputing | Logic gates based on nucleotide binding | Molecular computing elements |
These applications could leverage the highly evolved catalytic properties of ATP synthase components while engineering them for specific technological purposes.
Comparative studies of ATP synthases could provide insights into antibiotic resistance evolution:
Energy cost analysis:
Determine if resistant strains show adaptations in ATP synthase efficiency
Quantify energetic burden of resistance mechanisms
Co-evolutionary patterns:
Identify if ATP synthase mutations correlate with acquisition of resistance genes
Determine if compensatory mutations in energy metabolism accompany resistance
Transfer potential:
Assess if ATP synthase genes show evidence of horizontal gene transfer alongside resistance determinants
Evaluate if mobile genetic elements carrying resistance genes also impact energy metabolism
Given that chromosomal resistance islands in M. caseolyticus can carry methicillin resistance genes like mecD , understanding how these genetic elements affect core metabolic functions could provide valuable insights into the evolution and spread of antibiotic resistance.
Recent technological advances improving recombinant protein expression include:
| Technology | Application | Benefit for atpD Expression |
|---|---|---|
| Cell-free protein synthesis | In vitro transcription/translation | Avoids toxicity issues |
| Synthetic biology tools | Optimized genetic circuits | Fine-tuned expression control |
| High-throughput condition screening | Parallel testing of parameters | Rapid optimization of conditions |
| Novel fusion tags | Enhanced solubility systems | Improved protein folding |
| Engineered bacterial strains | Specialized expression hosts | Better handling of complex proteins |
| Nanodiscs and membrane mimetics | Membrane protein stabilization | Maintains native environment |
These technologies could be applied to improve the expression of functional M. caseolyticus atpD, particularly if traditional approaches yield insufficient protein quantities or activity.
Genomic approaches provide several insights into ATP synthase evolution:
Whole genome sequencing has revealed the genetic context of Macrococcus species, including mobile genetic elements that can carry resistance genes between species
Comparative genomics shows that chromosomal resistance islands in M. caseolyticus and M. canis can integrate into specific genomic locations and carry various resistance determinants
Analysis of methicillin-resistant M. caseolyticus has demonstrated both local and distant spread of related isolates, suggesting the potential for widespread distribution of genetic elements
Phylogenetic analysis indicates that highly related isolates may carry different resistance genes (mecB or mecD), suggesting dynamic gene acquisition and loss
Similar approaches applied specifically to ATP synthase genes could reveal patterns of conservation, selection, and potential adaptation to different ecological niches or resistance states.
ATP synthase plays important roles in antibiotic tolerance and persistence:
Energy modulation: Reduced ATP synthase activity can induce a low-energy state associated with antibiotic tolerance
Persister cell formation: Metabolic dormancy mediated by altered ATP synthase function contributes to persister cell development
Membrane potential: ATP synthase activity affects proton motive force, which influences uptake of certain antibiotics
Stress response: Energy conservation through ATP synthase regulation helps bacteria survive antibiotic stress
These aspects are particularly relevant for M. caseolyticus given its role as a reservoir of resistance genes that can potentially transfer to more pathogenic staphylococci . Understanding how ATP synthase function intersects with resistance mechanisms could provide new targets for combating antibiotic resistance.