Recombinant Macropus giganteus Cytochrome c (CYCS)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Expression Systems

  • Host: Typically expressed in E. coli using arabinose-inducible plasmids (e.g., pBAD vectors) with periplasmic targeting via signal peptides (e.g., Bordetella pertussis cytochrome c₄ signal) .

  • Tags: C-terminal hexahistidine (His-tag) for affinity purification .

Biogenesis Pathways

ParameterSystem I (CcmABCDEFGH)System II (CcsBA)System III (HCCS)
OrganismBacteriaBacteriaMitochondria
Heme SourceEndogenousExported hemeEndogenous
Key ProteinsCcmA-HCcsBAHCCS
Recognition MotifCXXCH + α-helix 1 CXXCH (thiol-dependent) CXXCH + α-helix 1

Data synthesized from studies on human, bacterial, and mitochondrial CYCS .

Purification and Analysis

  • Purification:

    • Affinity chromatography (Ni-NTA for His-tagged proteins) .

    • Secondary purification via ion-exchange (e.g., DEAE) or size exclusion chromatography .

  • Quality Control:

    • Purity: >95% confirmed by SDS-PAGE .

    • Heme attachment: Validated by heme staining and UV-Vis spectroscopy (α-peak at 550 nm) .

    • Mass spectrometry: Confirms signal peptide cleavage and heme addition (e.g., +616 Da) .

Electron Transfer Activity

  • Redox potential: ~+250 mV, consistent with mitochondrial cytochrome c .

  • Kinetics: Efficient electron shuttling between complexes III and IV in vitro .

Apoptotic Role

  • Released from mitochondria upon pro-apoptotic signals (e.g., calcium flux, ROS).

  • Binds Apaf-1 to activate caspase-9, triggering apoptosis .

Comparative Insights

  • Species-Specific Variations:

    • Human vs. Macropus giganteus: Sequence divergence likely impacts heme affinity or redox tuning, though structural homology is expected .

  • Expression Yield: Bacterial systems (e.g., E. coli) yield 1–5 mg/L of holocytochrome c .

Challenges and Innovations

  • Heme Export: System II (CcsBA) enables heme attachment in the periplasm but requires reducing conditions (DTT) .

  • Folding: Post-translational folding is critical for releasing cytochrome c from synthases (e.g., HCCS) .

Applications

  • Research: Apoptosis assays, mitochondrial dysfunction studies .

  • Biotechnology: Electron transport chain reconstitution, biosensors .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the in-stock format, but if you have special format requirements, please note them when ordering, and we will fulfill your request.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary based on purchasing method and location. Consult your local distributor for specific delivery times. All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. For dry ice shipping, contact us in advance; additional charges apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Working aliquots are stable at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer components, storage temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form is generally stable for 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form is generally stable for 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
CYCS; CYCCytochrome c
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
2-105
Protein Length
Full Length of Mature Protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Macropus giganteus (Eastern gray kangaroo)
Target Names
Target Protein Sequence
GDVEKGKKI FVQKCAQCHT VEKGGKHKTG PNLNGIFGRK TGQAPGFTYT DANKNKGIIW GEDTLMEYLE NPKKYIPGTK MIFAGIKKKG ERADLIAYLK KATNE
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Cytochrome c is an electron carrier protein. Oxidized cytochrome c accepts an electron from cytochrome c1 (of cytochrome reductase) and transfers it to cytochrome oxidase (the final electron carrier in the mitochondrial electron transport chain). It also plays a role in apoptosis. Suppression of anti-apoptotic or activation of pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members alters mitochondrial membrane permeability, releasing cytochrome c into the cytosol. Cytochrome c binding to Apaf-1 activates caspase-9, which accelerates apoptosis by activating other caspases.
Protein Families
Cytochrome c family
Subcellular Location
Mitochondrion intermembrane space. Note=Loosely associated with the inner membrane.

Q&A

What is Macropus giganteus Cytochrome c and how does it function in cellular respiration?

Cytochrome c from Macropus giganteus (Eastern Grey Kangaroo) is a small heme-containing protein that functions as an electron carrier in the mitochondrial electron transport chain. Like its homologs in other species, it accepts electrons from the cytochrome c1 subunit of cytochrome reductase and transfers them to the cytochrome oxidase complex, serving as the final protein carrier in the mitochondrial electron transport chain . Additionally, it plays a critical role in apoptosis, where its release from mitochondria into the cytosol triggers caspase activation . The study of this marsupial cytochrome c provides valuable comparative data on the evolution of these critical cellular processes.

What expression systems are most effective for producing recombinant Macropus giganteus Cytochrome c?

Escherichia coli represents the most commonly used expression system for recombinant cytochrome c proteins. For effective expression, researchers should consider two key approaches:

  • Cytoplasmic expression: Using E. coli with co-expression of the System III cytochrome c biogenesis pathway (CCHL) in the cytoplasm . This approach requires careful consideration of reducing environments.

  • Periplasmic expression: Engineering the protein with an appropriate signal sequence (such as that from Bordetella pertussis cytochrome c4) for periplasmic targeting, coupled with expression of either System I (CcmABCDEFGH) or System II (CcsBA) cytochrome c biogenesis machinery .

For optimal heme attachment, the E. coli expression system should include appropriate biogenesis pathways. System I (CcmABCDEFGH) has demonstrated ability to attach heme to various c-type cytochromes and may provide greater flexibility for non-cognate cytochromes .

How can the heme attachment in recombinant Macropus giganteus Cytochrome c be verified?

Verification of proper heme attachment to recombinant Macropus giganteus Cytochrome c can be accomplished through multiple complementary methods:

  • Heme staining following SDS-PAGE: This simple and effective method allows visualization of covalently attached heme groups after electrophoretic separation . The technique reveals whether the expressed protein contains the properly incorporated heme group.

  • Spectroscopic analysis: UV-visible spectroscopy can confirm characteristic absorption peaks of properly folded cytochrome c with covalently attached heme. The reduced and oxidized states show distinctive spectral signatures.

  • Mass spectrometry: To precisely determine if heme attachment has occurred at the expected CXXCH motif cysteines.

  • Functional assays: Electron transfer capability testing can confirm that the recombinant protein is functionally active.

The heme stain method is particularly useful for rapid screening of expression conditions, while spectroscopic and functional analyses provide more detailed information about the quality of the recombinant protein .

What are the critical considerations when designing expression vectors for Macropus giganteus Cytochrome c?

When designing expression vectors for Macropus giganteus Cytochrome c, researchers must address several critical factors:

  • Signal sequence selection: For periplasmic expression, an appropriate signal sequence must be engineered in-frame to the N-terminus of the cytochrome c gene. The Bordetella pertussis cytochrome c4 signal sequence has been demonstrated to work efficiently for periplasmic targeting in E. coli .

  • Codon optimization: Adapting the marsupial gene codons to match E. coli preference patterns can significantly enhance expression levels.

  • Promoter selection: For controlled expression, inducible promoters such as arabinose-inducible pBAD systems have proven effective for cytochrome c expression .

  • Affinity tag placement: C-terminal hexahistidine tags have been successfully used for cytochrome c purification without significantly affecting protein folding or heme attachment .

  • Compatibility with biogenesis systems: Vectors must be compatible with plasmids expressing appropriate cytochrome c biogenesis systems (I, II, or III) to ensure proper heme attachment .

Careful consideration of these factors is essential for successful expression of functional Macropus giganteus Cytochrome c with proper heme incorporation.

How can researchers troubleshoot issues with protein folding and stability in recombinant Macropus giganteus Cytochrome c?

Troubleshooting folding and stability issues in recombinant Macropus giganteus Cytochrome c requires systematic investigation of multiple parameters:

  • Expression temperature optimization: Lower temperatures (16-25°C) often improve folding by slowing protein synthesis and allowing more time for proper folding and heme attachment.

  • Biogenesis system selection: Compare System I (CcmABCDEFGH), System II (CcsBA), and System III (CCHL) for their effectiveness in properly attaching heme to marsupial cytochrome c . Research has shown that different systems have varying substrate specificities that may affect folding outcomes.

  • Thiol redox environment management: Ensure appropriate reducing conditions as cytochrome c assembly requires specific thiol redox requirements. The E. coli periplasmic DsbC/DsbD thiol-reduction pathway components play important roles in this process .

  • pH monitoring during expression: Cytochrome c can form aggregates at its isoelectric point, affecting proper folding. Controlling pH away from the isoelectric point can minimize aggregation .

  • Stability assessment techniques: Employ circular dichroism in the far-UV range to monitor secondary structure changes under different conditions . This provides valuable information about protein stability and folding status.

When faced with persistent folding issues, researchers can also attempt direct comparison of identical substrates in the same cellular compartment using the recombinant periplasmic CCHL system, which facilitates more controlled comparative studies .

What approaches can be used to study genetic variation in Macropus giganteus Cytochrome c and its evolutionary implications?

Studying genetic variation in Macropus giganteus Cytochrome c requires sophisticated molecular approaches:

  • PCR-based single-strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) analysis: This technique can effectively detect sequence variations in cytochrome c genes, as demonstrated in studies of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 in marsupials .

  • DNA sequencing of multiple specimens: Selective sequencing following SSCP screening can identify distinct haplotypes. In related studies, this approach has revealed significant genetic diversity in mitochondrial genes of macropodid marsupials .

  • Phylogenetic analysis: Employing maximum parsimony and neighbor-joining methods to analyze sequence data can reveal evolutionary relationships and define distinct clades . Such analyses can help identify potential cryptic species or population structures.

  • Geographic sampling strategies: Collecting samples across the range of Macropus giganteus enables assessment of geographic patterns in genetic variation. Previous studies of marsupials have identified distinct genetic clades associated with different geographic regions .

  • Comparative analysis with related species: Including cytochrome c sequences from related macropodids (e.g., Macropus rufus, M. robustus) provides context for understanding host-specific adaptations and potential instances of convergent evolution .

These approaches can reveal important evolutionary patterns, including evidence of selection pressure on electron transport proteins in different marsupial lineages, potentially reflecting adaptations to different metabolic demands or environmental conditions.

How can researchers evaluate the functional differences between Macropus giganteus Cytochrome c and human Cytochrome c?

Evaluating functional differences between Macropus giganteus and human cytochrome c requires multi-faceted experimental approaches:

  • Electron transfer kinetics: Using stopped-flow spectroscopy to measure electron transfer rates between purified recombinant cytochromes and their redox partners (cytochrome c reductase and cytochrome c oxidase). This reveals species-specific differences in primary mitochondrial function.

  • Apoptotic activity assessment: Comparative testing of the ability of each cytochrome c to activate caspase cascades when added to cytosolic extracts. Human cytochrome c is known to bind Apaf-1, triggering caspase-9 activation, which then accelerates apoptosis by activating other caspases . Differences in this activity may reveal evolutionary adaptations in apoptotic pathways.

  • Binding affinity determination: Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) or isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) to quantify binding affinities to partner proteins, including complex III, complex IV, and apoptotic factors.

  • Thermal and chemical stability comparisons: Circular dichroism spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry can reveal differences in protein stability that may reflect adaptations to different physiological environments.

  • Cross-species complementation: Testing whether marsupial cytochrome c can functionally replace human cytochrome c in cellular models, and vice versa, provides insights into functional conservation and divergence.

These approaches can illuminate how evolutionary divergence between marsupial and eutherian mammals has affected this highly conserved protein's structure-function relationships.

What methodological considerations are important when optimizing heterologous expression systems for proper biogenesis of Macropus giganteus Cytochrome c?

Optimizing heterologous expression systems for Macropus giganteus Cytochrome c requires careful attention to several critical methodological considerations:

  • Biogenesis pathway selection: Compare all three natural pathways for cytochrome c assembly (Systems I, II, and III) to determine the most effective for marsupial cytochrome c production . System I (CcmABCDEFGH) provides versatility for attaching heme to various c-type cytochromes, while System III (CCHL) may have more stringent substrate specificity .

  • Compartmentalization strategy: Consider whether cytoplasmic or periplasmic expression is optimal. Periplasmic expression using appropriate signal sequences creates an environment bioenergetically analogous to the mitochondrial intermembrane space where cytochrome c naturally functions .

  • Thiol redox pathway components: Ensure appropriate thiol reduction pathways are present. Recombinant periplasmic Systems II and III utilize components of the E. coli periplasmic DsbC/DsbD thiol-reduction pathway . These components may need to be co-expressed or their levels modulated for optimal results.

  • Recognition determinant analysis: Consider that cytochrome c biogenesis enzymes may have specific recognition requirements beyond the CXXCH motif. Recent studies using cytoplasmic recombinant CCHL have started to define specific residues in apocytochrome c important for CCHL recognition .

  • Host strain selection: Choose E. coli strains with appropriate reducing environments and low protease activity. Strains optimized for membrane and periplasmic protein expression may yield better results.

  • Post-translation analysis: Implement robust techniques for verifying proper heme attachment, including heme staining after SDS-PAGE and spectroscopic analysis to confirm the presence of correctly formed holocytochrome c.

When optimizing these systems, systematic comparison of identical substrates in the same cellular compartment using different biogenesis systems provides the most controlled approach to determining optimal expression conditions .

How does the genetic diversity of Cytochrome c in Macropus giganteus compare to that of other macropodid marsupials?

The genetic diversity of cytochrome c in Macropus giganteus should be analyzed in the context of broader macropodid evolutionary patterns:

Studies on related mitochondrial genes in macropodids have revealed significant genetic diversity. Analysis of cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) among 179 specimens across 13 different host species identified 53 distinct haplotypes and 12 distinct clades through phylogenetic analysis . This suggests that substantial genetic variation may also exist in the cytochrome c gene itself across macropodid populations.

In areas where multiple macropodid species coexist, comparative analysis can reveal whether geographic or host factors more strongly influence genetic structure. Previous studies found that three distinct genetic clades could exist within a single host species (M. robustus), suggesting complex evolutionary histories .

When comparing genetic diversity patterns between M. giganteus cytochrome c and other macropodids, researchers should examine:

  • Rate of molecular evolution relative to other mammalian lineages

  • Evidence of positive or purifying selection on functional domains

  • Correlation between genetic distinctiveness and ecological specialization

This comparative approach can provide insights into how evolutionary processes have shaped this essential protein across marsupial lineages with different ecological adaptations.

What are the critical differences in experimental design when working with recombinant marsupial versus eutherian mammalian cytochrome c?

Working with recombinant marsupial cytochrome c presents several distinct experimental design considerations compared to eutherian mammalian counterparts:

  • Codon usage optimization: Marsupial genes often have different codon biases than eutherian genes, potentially requiring specific optimization for expression in bacterial systems. Custom codon optimization for E. coli expression may be necessary for efficient translation.

  • Recognition by biogenesis machinery: The human CCHL (System III) shows specificity for human cytochrome c, while having broader activity toward cytochrome c1 . Researchers must determine whether human CCHL can effectively process marsupial cytochrome c or if alternative biogenesis systems provide better results.

  • Physiological temperature considerations: Marsupials typically have lower body temperatures than eutherian mammals. Expression, folding, and functional assays may need to be conducted at temperatures reflective of marsupial physiology (approximately 35-36°C rather than 37°C) for optimal physiological relevance.

  • Substrate specificity testing: When examining functional interactions, researchers must consider that marsupial cytochrome c may have evolved specific interactions with its cognate redox partners. Experiments should test both homologous (marsupial-marsupial) and heterologous (marsupial-eutherian) protein-protein interactions.

  • Immunological detection methods: Antibodies raised against eutherian cytochrome c may have reduced cross-reactivity with marsupial variants. Immunoblot assays using such antibodies should be validated for cross-reactivity or marsupial-specific antibodies should be developed .

These considerations highlight the importance of adapting experimental protocols when working with marsupial proteins to account for evolutionary divergence from the more commonly studied eutherian mammalian systems.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.