Recombinant Malassezia globosa Assembly Factor CBP4 (CBP4) is a heterologously expressed protein derived from the pathogenic yeast Malassezia globosa, which is implicated in skin conditions such as dandruff and seborrheic dermatitis . This full-length protein (1–73 amino acids) is fused with an N-terminal His tag for purification and structural stability. Its UniProt identifier is A8PYF7, and it is annotated as MGL_1653 in genomic databases . The gene name "CBP4" suggests a role in cytochrome b mRNA processing or mitochondrial assembly, though direct functional studies remain limited .
While CBP4 itself has not been functionally characterized in peer-reviewed studies, its classification as an "assembly factor" and association with mitochondrial processes suggest potential roles in:
Mitochondrial Protein Assembly: Similar to cytochrome b mRNA processing proteins, CBP4 may assist in the maturation or assembly of mitochondrial electron transport chain components .
Pathogenicity Mechanisms: Malassezia globosa relies on mitochondrial function for lipid metabolism and survival in lipid-rich human skin environments. CBP4 could indirectly influence pathogenicity by maintaining mitochondrial integrity .
Related Proteins in M. globosa:
Other characterized proteins include:
CYP51: A lanosterol 14α-demethylase targeted by antifungal azoles, with mutations linked to resistance .
NPR: An NADPH-P450 reductase supporting cytochrome P450 enzymes, critical for fungal metabolism .
Lipases: Secreted enzymes (e.g., MgLip2) hydrolyzing sebum triglycerides, contributing to skin colonization .
CBP4’s recombinant form enables studies in:
Structural Biology: Crystallization or cryo-EM to elucidate its role in mitochondrial processes.
Pathogenicity Studies: Investigating its interaction with host cells or lipid-rich environments.
Drug Target Identification: Exploring whether CBP4 inhibition disrupts mitochondrial function in M. globosa.
KEGG: mgl:MGL_1653
Assembly factor CBP4 in Malassezia globosa is a protein involved in cytochrome b mRNA processing and mitochondrial function. Based on its homology to similar proteins in other fungi, CBP4 likely plays a critical role in the assembly of respiratory chain complexes, particularly complex III, which is essential for mitochondrial respiration and energy production in eukaryotic cells .
The methodological approach to studying CBP4 function typically involves:
Gene expression analysis using qRT-PCR and RNA-Seq
Subcellular localization studies using fluorescently tagged proteins
Functional assessment through gene knockdown/knockout experiments
Mitochondrial function assays (oxygen consumption, membrane potential)
Genomic analyses of Malassezia globosa have revealed that CBP4 is part of a complex proteome that includes multiple enzymes involved in lipid metabolism and cell wall maintenance . While specific interaction partners for CBP4 have not been definitively characterized, its function in mitochondrial processes suggests potential associations with:
Other mitochondrial assembly factors
Components of respiratory chain complexes
Proteins involved in mitochondrial gene expression
Protein Class | Examples in M. globosa | Potential Relationship to CBP4 |
---|---|---|
Mitochondrial Assembly Factors | Cox assembly factors | Co-regulation, functional interaction |
Respiratory Chain Components | Cytochrome b, cytochrome c | Assembly targets |
Lipid Metabolism Enzymes | Multiple lipases (14+ identified) | Metabolic coordination |
Secreted Hydrolases | Aspartyl proteases (MgSAP1) | Indirect relationship through cellular metabolism |
Based on successful expression of other M. globosa proteins, the following methodological approach is recommended :
Expression System Selection:
E. coli BL21(DE3) is typically the first-choice host
For membrane-associated proteins like CBP4, consider specialized strains like C41(DE3) or C43(DE3)
Vector Design:
pET-series vectors with N-terminal affinity tags (His6 or MBP)
Codon optimization for E. coli is essential due to GC content differences
Expression Parameters:
Parameter | Recommended Condition | Alternative Conditions |
---|---|---|
Induction | 0.2-0.5 mM IPTG at OD600 0.6-0.8 | Auto-induction media |
Temperature | 18-20°C for 16-18 hours | 15°C for 24 hours |
Media | Terrific Broth supplemented with 1% glucose | LB, 2xYT, auto-induction |
Cell Density | Harvest at OD600 3.0-4.0 | Mid-log phase for membrane proteins |
When expressing CBP4, researchers should monitor expression levels through SDS-PAGE and Western blotting at various timepoints to determine optimal harvest time .
Purification of recombinant CBP4 requires a multi-step approach similar to that used for other M. globosa proteins :
Cell Lysis:
For membrane-associated proteins like CBP4, use detergent-containing buffers (0.5-1% DDM or CHAPS)
Buffer composition: 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, protease inhibitors
Affinity Chromatography:
Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) for His-tagged CBP4
Binding: 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 0.05% detergent
Washing: Gradual increase to 50 mM imidazole
Elution: 250-300 mM imidazole
Secondary Purification:
Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) using Superdex 75/200
Buffer: 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 0.03% detergent
Expected results based on similar proteins:
Purification Step | Typical Yield | Purity | Assessment Method |
---|---|---|---|
IMAC | 5-10 mg/L culture | 70-80% | SDS-PAGE, Western blot |
SEC | 2-5 mg/L culture | >90% | SDS-PAGE, mass spectrometry |
A critical step in CBP4 purification is maintaining protein stability through all steps, which often requires optimization of buffer components including salt concentration, pH, and stabilizing additives .
Verifying functional activity of recombinant CBP4 requires both biophysical characterization and functional assays :
Structural Integrity Assessment:
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to confirm secondary structure
Thermal shift assays to evaluate protein stability
Size exclusion chromatography with multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS) to determine oligomeric state
Functional Analysis:
In vitro binding assays with predicted interaction partners
Complementation studies in yeast strains lacking CBP4
Association with mitochondrial membranes in reconstituted systems
Activity Relationship to Native Function:
Assay Type | Methodology | Expected Outcome | Controls |
---|---|---|---|
Binding | Microscale thermophoresis with labeled cytochrome components | Binding in μM-nM range | Heat-denatured protein |
Complementation | Expression in S. cerevisiae CBP4 deletion strain | Restoration of respiratory growth | Empty vector |
Mitochondrial Function | Oxygen consumption rate in reconstituted systems | Enhanced cytochrome b assembly | No protein control |
Understanding CBP4 expression patterns requires a systematic time-course analysis across growth phases :
Experimental Approach:
Culture M. globosa in modified Dixon medium (optimal for lipid-dependent Malassezia)
Sample at defined intervals spanning lag, exponential, and stationary phases
Isolate RNA and proteins for expression analysis
Analytical Methods:
qRT-PCR targeting CBP4 mRNA
Western blotting with CBP4-specific antibodies
RNA-Seq for global transcriptomic context
Contextual Analysis:
Compare CBP4 expression with other mitochondrial genes
Correlate expression with metabolic shifts (e.g., lipid utilization)
Compare planktonic versus biofilm growth conditions
Research findings from similar mitochondrial proteins suggest CBP4 expression may increase during early exponential growth phase when energy demands are highest, and may correlate with lipid availability in the medium .
The potential role of CBP4 in M. globosa pathogenicity requires investigation through multiple approaches :
Expression Comparison:
Compare CBP4 expression between strains with different virulence profiles
Analyze expression in clinical isolates from patients with varying disease severity
Examine expression under conditions mimicking the host environment
Host-Pathogen Interaction:
Assess host immune response to recombinant CBP4
Investigate CBP4 expression during co-culture with human keratinocytes
Evaluate potential role in stress response during host colonization
Functional Contribution:
Pathogenic Mechanism | Research Approach | Significance to CBP4 Function |
---|---|---|
Stress Adaptation | Growth under oxidative/nitrosative stress | Mitochondrial function essential for stress response |
Metabolic Flexibility | Growth on different lipid sources | Energy production for adaptation to skin environment |
Biofilm Formation | In vitro biofilm assays with CBP4 inhibition | Energy requirements during biofilm development |
Host Cell Damage | Co-culture with human keratinocytes | Potential role in damage-associated mechanisms |
Recent research has demonstrated that M. globosa expresses various factors during infection that contribute to its pathogenicity, though the specific role of CBP4 remains to be fully characterized .
M. globosa has evolved specific adaptations to thrive on human skin, and CBP4's role in this adaptation can be investigated through :
Environmental Response Studies:
Culture under varying conditions mimicking the skin microenvironment (pH 4.5-6.5, lipid composition)
Monitor CBP4 expression in response to skin-relevant conditions
Compare expression at different skin sites (scalp vs. back)
Comparative Analysis:
Compare CBP4 sequence and function across Malassezia species with different skin niches
Analyze CBP4 conservation between strains from healthy individuals versus those with skin disorders
Functional Significance:
Investigate CBP4's role in mitochondrial function during growth on skin-derived lipids
Assess contribution to stress tolerance under skin-relevant conditions
Evaluate relationship to other virulence factors
Research with other Malassezia species has shown that mitochondrial function is critical for adaptation to various environmental stresses encountered on human skin, suggesting CBP4 may play an important role in this adaptation .
Due to CBP4's relatively small size (73 amino acids) and potential membrane association, several structural biology approaches are suitable :
Solution NMR Spectroscopy:
Optimal for small proteins (<20 kDa)
Requires 15N, 13C-labeled protein expression
Can provide dynamics information in addition to structure
Methodology: Triple-resonance experiments for resonance assignment followed by NOE-based structure calculation
X-ray Crystallography:
Requires crystallization screening with and without detergents
May benefit from fusion partners to aid crystallization
Higher resolution potential than NMR
Cryo-Electron Microscopy:
Particularly valuable if studying CBP4 in complex with larger partners
May require larger tags or scaffolds for smaller proteins
Integrative Approaches:
Technique | Advantages | Limitations | Sample Requirements |
---|---|---|---|
NMR | Works well for small proteins, provides dynamics | Lower resolution for larger proteins | 5-10 mg uniformly labeled protein |
X-ray | High resolution, works for membrane proteins | Requires crystals | 5-10 mg highly pure protein |
SAXS | No size limitation, solution-state | Low resolution | 1-2 mg monodisperse sample |
Cross-linking MS | Identifies interaction interfaces | Indirect structural information | 0.1-1 mg protein complex |
A multi-technique approach combining computational modeling with experimental validation often yields the most comprehensive structural insights .
Site-directed mutagenesis represents a powerful approach to understanding CBP4 structure-function relationships :
Target Selection Strategy:
Conserved residues identified through multiple sequence alignment
Predicted functional motifs from structural analysis
Charged or hydrophobic patches on the protein surface
Mutagenesis Methodology:
QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis
Overlap extension PCR
Whole-plasmid PCR with phosphorylated primers
Functional Analysis of Mutants:
Target Region | Rationale | Mutation Strategy | Functional Assay |
---|---|---|---|
Transmembrane domain | Membrane anchoring | Alanine scanning | Membrane association assay |
Predicted binding interface | Protein-protein interaction | Charge reversal | Binding partner pull-down |
Conserved motifs | Core function | Conservative substitutions | Complementation assay |
Post-translational modification sites | Regulation | Phosphomimetic mutations | Activity assays |
The expression and purification of mutant proteins should follow the same protocol as the wild-type protein, with additional characterization to ensure proper folding before functional assays .
Computational prediction of CBP4 interactions requires an integrated bioinformatic approach :
Sequence-Based Prediction:
Identification of conserved protein-protein interaction domains
Coevolution analysis to identify potential interaction partners
Comparison with known interaction networks in related fungi
Structural Approaches:
Protein-protein docking simulations
Interface prediction based on surface properties
Molecular dynamics simulations to assess stability of predicted complexes
Network Integration:
Analysis Type | Tools | Expected Output | Validation Method |
---|---|---|---|
Sequence Analysis | BLAST, HMMER, InterProScan | Functional domains, motifs | Literature comparison |
Coevolution Analysis | GREMLIN, EVcouplings | Predicted interaction partners | Co-immunoprecipitation |
Structural Docking | HADDOCK, ClusPro, Rosetta | 3D models of protein complexes | Mutagenesis of interface |
Network Analysis | STRING, Cytoscape | Functional protein clusters | Co-expression validation |
The Malassezia genome analysis has revealed complex protein interaction networks, particularly in mitochondrial pathways, providing a framework for predicting CBP4 interactions .
Development of CBP4-targeted antifungal approaches would follow this research progression :
Target Validation:
Confirmation of CBP4 essentiality through gene knockdown/knockout
Assessment of CBP4 conservation across pathogenic Malassezia species
Structural comparison with human homologs to identify selective targeting opportunities
Screening Strategy:
Development of functional assays suitable for high-throughput screening
Structure-based virtual screening against the CBP4 binding site
Fragment-based screening to identify initial chemical matter
Compound Progression:
Development Stage | Key Experiments | Success Criteria | Potential Challenges |
---|---|---|---|
Target Validation | Gene silencing in M. globosa | Growth inhibition | Genetic manipulation difficulty |
Assay Development | Biochemical or cellular assays | Z' > 0.5, reproducibility | Protein stability, specificity |
Primary Screening | 10,000-100,000 compounds | Hit rate 0.1-1% | False positives |
Hit Validation | Dose-response, counter-screens | IC50 < 10 μM, selectivity | Off-target effects |
Lead Optimization | Structure-activity relationship | Improved potency, ADME | Synthetic accessibility |
Research on azole resistance in Malassezia species has identified mutations in cytochrome P450 enzymes, suggesting that targeting alternative pathways such as mitochondrial functions could provide new therapeutic approaches .
Understanding the interplay between CBP4 and established virulence factors requires integrated analysis :
Co-expression Analysis:
Transcriptomic profiling under various conditions
Correlation of CBP4 expression with known virulence factors
Clustering of co-regulated genes
Functional Relationships:
Investigation of energy requirements for virulence factor production
Assessment of mitochondrial function in strains with varying virulence
Metabolic network analysis connecting mitochondrial activity to virulence
Integrated View:
Recent research has demonstrated that M. globosa virulence factors often work in concert, suggesting CBP4's mitochondrial function may provide the energy required for virulence factor production .
Analyzing CBP4 genetic diversity requires a population genetics approach :
Strain Collection Strategy:
Isolation from patients with varying disease severity
Sampling from multiple body sites
Inclusion of healthy control subjects
Genetic Analysis:
Targeted sequencing of the CBP4 gene and promoter
Whole genome sequencing for broader genetic context
SNP and indel identification
Correlation with Phenotype:
Analysis Type | Methodology | Expected Outcome | Interpretation Framework |
---|---|---|---|
Sequence Variation | PCR and sequencing | SNPs, indels, copy number variations | Population genetics analysis |
Expression Variation | qRT-PCR, RNA-Seq | Differential expression patterns | Correlation with disease severity |
Functional Impact | Site-directed mutagenesis of variants | Altered protein function | Structure-function relationship |
Clinical Correlation | Statistical analysis | Association with disease phenotypes | Adjusted for confounding factors |
Research with M. globosa strains has identified genotype differences between isolates from dandruff patients versus healthy individuals, suggesting genetic variation may influence pathogenicity .
Recombinant CBP4 can serve as a valuable tool for broader studies of mitochondrial function :
Experimental Applications:
Development of antibodies for mitochondrial localization studies
Creation of fluorescently tagged versions for live-cell imaging
Use as a substrate for in vitro reconstitution experiments
Cross-Species Studies:
Expression in heterologous systems lacking endogenous CBP4
Comparative analysis across different fungal pathogens
Investigation of evolutionary conservation of mitochondrial assembly
Methodological Approaches:
Application | Technical Approach | Expected Insight | Research Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Antibody Development | Immunization with recombinant CBP4 | Localization in clinical samples | Diagnostic potential |
Functional Reconstitution | In vitro assembly assays | Mechanism of action | Target for intervention |
Cross-complementation | Expression in other fungal species | Functional conservation | Evolutionary insights |
Interaction Mapping | Pull-down with tagged CBP4 | Identification of partners | Network understanding |
Studies of mitochondrial function in pathogenic fungi have revealed unique adaptations that could be exploited for therapeutic targeting, making CBP4 research relevant beyond Malassezia biology .