Recombinant Mannheimia succiniciproducens 50S ribosomal protein L22 (rplV)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to settle the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which can serve as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
rplV; MS2043; 50S ribosomal protein L22
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-110
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Mannheimia succiniciproducens (strain MBEL55E)
Target Names
rplV
Target Protein Sequence
METIAKHRYA RTSAQKARLV ADLIRGKKVA AALEILTYTN KKAAALVKKV LESAIANAEH NDGADIDDLK VTKIFVDEGP SMKRVMPRAK GRADRILKRT SHITVVVSDR
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This protein exhibits specific binding to 23S rRNA, a process enhanced by other ribosomal proteins such as L4, L17, and L20. It plays a crucial role in early 50S ribosomal subunit assembly. Within the assembled 50S subunit and 70S ribosome, it interacts with multiple domains of the 23S rRNA. Its globular domain resides near the polypeptide exit tunnel on the subunit's exterior, while an extended beta-hairpin lines the exit tunnel wall within the 70S ribosome.
Database Links

KEGG: msu:MS2043

STRING: 221988.MS2043

Protein Families
Universal ribosomal protein uL22 family

Q&A

What is the structure and function of 50S ribosomal protein L22 in bacteria?

Ribosomal protein L22 belongs to the universal ribosomal protein uL22 family and plays critical roles in ribosome assembly and function. The protein binds specifically to 23S rRNA, with this binding stimulated by other ribosomal proteins including L4, L17, and L20 . Its structure typically consists of a globular domain located near the polypeptide exit tunnel on the outside of the ribosomal subunit, with an extended beta-hairpin that lines the wall of the exit tunnel in the center of the 70S ribosome . L22 makes multiple contacts with different domains of the 23S rRNA in the assembled 50S subunit, contributing significantly to ribosomal stability and function .

How does M. succiniciproducens differ from other bacterial species with respect to its proteome composition?

M. succiniciproducens MBEL55E is a capnophilic bacterium isolated from bovine rumen that has gained industrial importance as an efficient succinic acid producer . Proteome analysis using 2-DE and MS has led to the establishment of a comprehensive proteome reference map of M. succiniciproducens by analyzing whole cellular proteins, membrane proteins, and secreted proteins . More than 200 proteins have been identified and characterized using MS/MS supported by various bioinformatic tools, including proteins previously annotated as hypothetical or having putative functions . This proteome reference map has enabled comparative analysis of protein expression across different growth phases, providing valuable insights into physiological changes during growth and potential targets for strain improvement .

What methodologies are most effective for studying recombinant ribosomal proteins like L22?

For recombinant ribosomal protein studies, a multi-faceted approach is recommended:

  • Expression and Purification: Heterologous expression in E. coli systems with appropriate tags (e.g., His-tag) facilitates purification. SDS-PAGE with at least 15% separation gel is suitable for analyzing purity and molecular weight of L22 proteins .

  • Functional Characterization: RNA binding assays to test specific interaction with 23S rRNA, often through electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) or filter binding assays.

  • Structural Analysis: A combination of X-ray crystallography, NMR, or cryo-EM techniques depending on the specific research question.

  • Proteomic Analysis: 2-DE coupled with MS/MS has proven effective for analyzing ribosomal proteins in the context of the whole proteome, as demonstrated in M. succiniciproducens studies .

  • Bioinformatic Analysis: Various computational tools help predict structure, function, and evolutionary relationships of ribosomal proteins like L22 across bacterial species.

What evidence suggests ribosomal protein L22 may have extraribosomal functions?

Recent research has revealed that ribosomal proteins can perform critical functions outside their traditional roles in ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis. Studies on Rpl22 and its paralog Rpl22-Like1 (Rpl22l1) have demonstrated that these proteins can be retained in the nucleus during specific developmental stages where they regulate pre-mRNA splicing .

The specific mechanism involves:

  • Nuclear localization during critical developmental periods (e.g., gastrulation in zebrafish)

  • Direct binding to intronic sequences of specific pre-mRNAs (e.g., smad2)

  • Modulation of exon inclusion/skipping in cooperation with splicing factors like hnRNP-A1

While these studies were conducted in zebrafish, they raise the possibility that L22 proteins in bacterial systems like M. succiniciproducens might also have regulatory functions beyond ribosome participation . Such potential extraribosomal functions could influence cellular processes in ways not previously appreciated.

How might experimental designs detect potential extraribosomal functions of M. succiniciproducens L22?

Based on extraribosomal functions discovered in other organisms, researchers investigating potential regulatory roles of M. succiniciproducens L22 should consider:

  • Subcellular Localization Studies: Determining if L22 is found in unexpected cellular compartments or associated with non-ribosomal structures.

  • RNA-Binding Assays: Testing binding affinity not just to rRNA but to other RNA types using:

    • RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) followed by sequencing

    • Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment (SELEX)

    • Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSA) with various RNA substrates

  • Protein Interaction Studies: Identifying non-ribosomal binding partners through:

    • Co-immunoprecipitation coupled with mass spectrometry

    • Yeast two-hybrid screening

    • Proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID)

  • Loss-of-Function Experiments: Analysis of gene expression or physiological changes upon L22 depletion or mutation that cannot be explained by general translation defects.

What role might L22 play in the adaptation of M. succiniciproducens to different environmental conditions?

M. succiniciproducens, as a rumen bacterium adapted for efficient succinic acid production, likely undergoes significant proteome remodeling in response to environmental changes . Comparative proteome profiling at different growth phases has revealed valuable information about physiological adaptations . L22, as part of the ribosomal machinery, might contribute to these adaptations through:

What is the optimal protocol for expressing and purifying recombinant M. succiniciproducens L22?

While specific protocols for M. succiniciproducens L22 are not directly provided in the search results, a methodology based on successful approaches with other ribosomal proteins would include:

Expression Protocol:

  • Clone the coding sequence into a pET-based expression vector with an N-terminal His-tag

  • Transform into E. coli BL21(DE3) or similar expression strain

  • Grow cultures at 37°C until OD600 reaches 0.6-0.8

  • Induce with 0.5-1 mM IPTG

  • Shift temperature to 25-30°C for 4-6 hours or 18°C overnight

  • Harvest cells by centrifugation

Purification Protocol:

  • Lyse cells in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, and protease inhibitors

  • Clarify lysate by centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 30 minutes

  • Purify using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography

  • Apply additional purification steps (ion exchange, size exclusion) as needed

  • Analyze purity by SDS-PAGE using a discontinuous system with 5% enrichment gel and 15% separation gel

How can researchers verify the functionality of recombinant L22 protein?

Functional verification should focus on the established roles of L22 in ribosome assembly and rRNA binding :

rRNA Binding Assay:

  • Synthesize or isolate 23S rRNA fragments containing known L22 binding regions

  • Perform electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) with purified recombinant L22

  • Include competition assays with unlabeled RNA to confirm specificity

  • Analyze binding affinity using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) or isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC)

Ribosome Assembly Participation:

  • Conduct in vitro ribosome reconstitution assays with purified components

  • Use sucrose gradient centrifugation to analyze incorporation into ribosomal subunits

  • Perform complementation assays in L22-depleted systems

Structural Integrity Assessment:

  • Use circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to verify secondary structure elements

  • Employ thermal shift assays to assess protein stability

  • Compare results with known L22 proteins from related bacterial species

How should researchers analyze proteomics data to identify and characterize L22 in complex samples?

The analysis of proteomics data for identifying and characterizing L22 should follow a systematic approach:

Identification Protocol:

  • Perform database searches using search engines like MASCOT, SEQUEST, or X!Tandem

  • Use the M. succiniciproducens genome sequence as reference

  • Apply stringent filtering criteria (FDR ≤1%)

  • Require at least 2 unique peptides for confident protein identification

Quantification Approaches:

  • For relative quantification, employ label-free methods, SILAC, or iTRAQ

  • For absolute quantification, consider AQUA or QconCAT methodologies

  • Use appropriate normalization strategies based on experimental design

Post-Translational Modification Analysis:

  • Search for common PTMs (phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation)

  • Validate PTM sites using site-directed mutagenesis

  • Correlate PTMs with functional changes or environmental conditions

Comparative Analysis:
As demonstrated in M. succiniciproducens studies, comparing protein profiles across different growth phases can reveal valuable information about physiological changes . For L22 specifically, researchers should look for:

  • Changes in abundance

  • Alterations in modification patterns

  • Association with different protein complexes

What bioinformatic approaches can predict potential RNA binding sites in L22?

ApproachDescriptionAdvantagesLimitations
Sequence Motif AnalysisIdentification of known RNA-binding motifsSimple, fastMay miss novel binding patterns
Structure-based PredictionUses 3D structural information to identify potential interaction surfacesMore accurate for proteins with known structuresRequires structural data
Machine Learning MethodsTrained on known RNA-binding proteins to predict new binding sitesCan identify complex patternsDepends on quality of training data
Molecular DynamicsSimulates dynamic interactions between protein and RNACaptures flexibility in bindingComputationally intensive
Evolutionary ConservationIdentifies conserved residues across homologsHighlights functionally important sitesMay miss species-specific adaptations

For L22 specifically, researchers should focus on regions known to interact with rRNA while also exploring potential binding sites for other RNA types, particularly if investigating extraribosomal functions similar to those observed with Rpl22 in other systems .

How does M. succiniciproducens L22 compare to homologous proteins across bacterial species?

While specific comparative data for M. succiniciproducens L22 is not provided in the search results, a framework for such analysis would include:

Sequence Comparison:
Compare the amino acid sequence of M. succiniciproducens L22 with homologs from other bacteria, particularly focusing on:

  • Conserved domains characteristic of the uL22 family

  • Species-specific variations that might relate to functional specialization

  • Regions involved in rRNA binding and ribosome assembly

Structural Comparison:
Based on known structures like that of Anaplasma phagocytophilum L22 , analyze:

  • Conservation of the globular domain

  • Variations in the beta-hairpin region that lines the exit tunnel

  • Surface residues potentially involved in protein-protein interactions

Functional Comparison:
Examine similarities and differences in:

  • rRNA binding specificity and affinity

  • Involvement in ribosome assembly

  • Potential extraribosomal functions

What evidence suggests evolutionary pressure on L22 in different bacterial lineages?

Type of Evolutionary PressurePotential EvidenceFunctional Implications
Purifying SelectionHigh sequence conservation in functional domainsMaintenance of critical ribosomal functions
Positive SelectionAccelerated evolution in specific lineagesAdaptation to unique ecological niches
CoevolutionCorrelated changes with interacting rRNA regionsMaintenance of structural complementarity
Gene DuplicationPresence of paralogs in some lineagesPotential for subfunctionalization or neofunctionalization
Horizontal Gene TransferUnusual phylogenetic distributionAcquisition of advantageous variants

In the case of ribosomal proteins like L22, evidence from other systems suggests that while core functions are highly conserved, some regions may evolve to support specialized functions—potentially including extraribosomal activities as observed with Rpl22 in zebrafish .

What insights can proteomics provide about L22's role in M. succiniciproducens metabolism?

Proteome analysis of M. succiniciproducens has provided valuable information about physiological changes during different growth phases and suggested target genes for strain improvement . For L22 specifically, proteomic approaches can reveal:

  • Expression Patterns: Changes in L22 abundance across growth phases or in response to environmental perturbations

  • Post-translational Modifications: Potential regulatory PTMs that might alter L22 function

  • Protein Interactions: Co-expression or physical association with metabolic enzymes or regulatory factors

  • Strain Comparisons: Differences in L22 between wild-type and engineered strains with altered succinic acid production efficiency

Such proteomic insights could connect ribosomal protein function to the specialized metabolism of M. succiniciproducens, potentially revealing unexpected relationships between translation machinery and metabolic efficiency.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.