Recombinant Marinomonas sp. Ribosome-recycling factor (frr)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Biological Role of RRF

RRF collaborates with elongation factor G (EF-G) to split post-termination ribosomes (70S complexes) into subunits (50S and 30S), facilitating ribosome recycling. In Escherichia coli, RRF is essential for viability, as its depletion leads to ribosome stalling at stop codons and disrupted translation efficiency .

Key Functional Features:

  • Mechanism: RRF binds to the ribosomal A-site, inducing structural changes that promote subunit dissociation .

  • Conservation: Homologs exist across bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, where recombinant RRF retains activity in heterologous systems .

Recombinant RRF Production

While no direct studies on Marinomonas sp. RRF are documented, recombinant RRF production in other bacteria involves:

  1. Gene Cloning: The frr gene is amplified and inserted into expression vectors.

  2. Host Expression: Commonly expressed in E. coli with affinity tags (e.g., His-tag) for purification .

  3. Functional Validation: Activity is confirmed via polysome dissociation assays .

Example: Pseudomonas aeruginosa RRF

  • Sequence Identity: 64% similarity to E. coli RRF .

  • Activity: Purified recombinant P. aeruginosa RRF dissociates E. coli polysomes, demonstrating cross-species functionality .

Genomic Context and Regulation

In bacteria, the frr gene is often located in operons with ribosomal proteins (e.g., rpsB, tsf, pyrH) . While Marinomonas sp. genomic data for frr is lacking, CRISPR-Cas systems and bacteriocin synthesis (e.g., R-type bacteriocins) dominate its characterized genetic elements .

Potential Applications and Challenges

  1. Antibiotic Development: Targeting RRF could disrupt bacterial translation, but its essentiality necessitates caution .

  2. Biotechnological Tools: Engineered RRF variants might optimize in vitro translation systems.

Challenges:

  • Species-Specific Variations: Structural differences in RRF may affect cross-species activity .

  • Expression Optimization: Codon usage and solubility require tailoring for Marinomonas sp. .

Research Gaps and Future Directions

  • Genomic Characterization: Identification and annotation of frr in Marinomonas sp. genomes.

  • Functional Studies: Assays to confirm recombinant RRF activity in native and heterologous systems.

  • Structural Analysis: Cryo-EM or X-ray crystallography to resolve Marinomonas RRF-ribosome interactions.

Table 1: Comparative RRF Activity in Bacterial Species

SpeciesRecombinant RRF ActivitySequence Identity to E. coli RRFReference
Escherichia coliEssential for recycling100%
Pseudomonas aeruginosaFunctional in E. coli64%
Marinomonas sp.Not yet characterizedN/A

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the in-stock format preferentially. If you have special format requirements, please note them when ordering, and we will fulfill your request.
Lead Time
Delivery time varies by purchase method and location. Please consult your local distributor for specific delivery times. All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. For dry ice shipping, please contact us in advance; additional fees apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to collect contents at the bottom. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer components, storage temperature, and protein stability. Generally, the liquid form has a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, and the lyophilized form has a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type will be determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize developing it.
Synonyms
frr; Mmwyl1_1275; Ribosome-recycling factor; RRF; Ribosome-releasing factor
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-185
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Marinomonas sp. (strain MWYL1)
Target Names
frr
Target Protein Sequence
MINEILKDAE DRMSKAVASV ESAFKKIRTG RAHPSILDSV KVNYYGSETP LSQVANITVE DARTLGVSPW ENNLVPEIEK AIMKSDLGLN PATNGNLIRI PMPALTEETR KNYFKQAKNE AENGRIAIRN IRRDANGSLK DLVKEKEISE DDDRRGQDQV QKVTDKYVAQ IEERLAAKEK DLMEI
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Releases ribosomes from messenger RNA at the termination of protein biosynthesis. May improve translation efficiency by recycling ribosomes.
Database Links
Protein Families
RRF family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is Marinomonas sp. ribosome-recycling factor (frr) and why is it essential for bacterial growth?

Ribosome recycling factor (RRF), encoded by the frr gene, is an essential protein responsible for dissociating ribosomes from mRNA after translation termination. It functions to "recycle" ribosomes, making them available for subsequent rounds of protein synthesis . Studies in Escherichia coli demonstrate that frr is an essential gene for cell growth, as bacterial strains with frame-shifted frr chromosomal copies cannot survive without a functional frr gene provided via a plasmid . In bacterial translation, RRF works together with Elongation Factor G (EF-G) to disassemble the post-termination complex into its constituent ribosomal small (30S) and large (50S) subunits, plus mRNA and free tRNA . This recycling process is crucial for efficient protein synthesis, as evidenced by the dramatic reduction in protein synthesis observed upon loss of RRF both in vivo and in vitro .

How does Marinomonas sp. RRF structure compare to RRF from other bacterial species?

While specific structural data for Marinomonas sp. RRF is not directly available in current literature, comparative analysis can be inferred from characterized bacterial RRFs. Crystal and solution structures of RRF from several organisms show that RRF is composed of two domains that adopt an "L" configuration . The structural conservation of RRF across bacterial species suggests Marinomonas sp. RRF likely maintains this characteristic domain organization.

Bacterial SpeciesRRF Structure FeaturesRibosome Interaction SitesCross-Species Functionality
E. coli"L"-shaped, two-domainH69 of 50S subunitFunctions in native host
T. thermophilus"L"-shaped, two-domainH69 of 50S subunit, S12 in 30SFunctions on E. coli ribosomes
Marinomonas sp. (predicted)Likely "L"-shaped, two-domainPredicted to interact with H69 and S12Unknown, requires experimental validation

When bound to ribosomes, RRF induces specific conformational changes in helix H69 in the 50S subunit. Notably, RRF from both E. coli and T. thermophilus causes helix H69 to undergo an ordered to disordered transition when bound to E. coli ribosomes . Additionally, Domain II of RRF directly interacts with protein S12 in the 30S subunit .

What expression systems are most effective for recombinant Marinomonas sp. frr production?

Selecting an appropriate expression system is critical for successful production of functional recombinant Marinomonas sp. RRF. Based on established protocols for similar proteins, the following systems should be considered:

Expression SystemAdvantagesDisadvantagesOptimal Conditions for Marinomonas Proteins
E. coli BL21(DE3)High yield, simple protocolMay not incorporate marine-specific modifications15-25°C induction, 0.1-0.5mM IPTG, marine salt supplementation
P. pastorisBetter for some marine proteins Longer expression time20-25°C, methanol induction protocol
Cell-free systemsRapid production, avoids toxicityLower yield, higher costSupplemented with marine-like salt concentrations

For marine bacterial proteins like those from Marinomonas sp., expression conditions should be optimized to account for potential salt requirements or temperature preferences. Temperature optimization is crucial; many marine proteins show optimal expression at lower temperatures (15-25°C) compared to the standard 37°C used for E. coli.

What purification strategy yields highly active recombinant Marinomonas sp. RRF?

A multi-step chromatographic approach is recommended for purifying recombinant Marinomonas sp. RRF:

  • Initial capture using affinity chromatography (if a His-tag or other affinity tag is incorporated)

  • Ion exchange chromatography (IEX) to separate based on charge differences

  • Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) as a polishing step

For RRF specifically, which interacts with ribosomes, researchers should be cautious about potential co-purification with ribosomal components. A high-salt wash (300-500 mM NaCl) during initial purification steps can help disrupt such interactions. Based on successful purification of other marine-derived recombinant proteins, SEC using a Sephadex G-15 column has proven effective for the final polishing step , and RP-HPLC can be used for final purity assessment.

How can researchers verify the structural integrity of purified recombinant Marinomonas sp. RRF?

Verification of structural integrity is essential to ensure that purified recombinant Marinomonas sp. RRF maintains its native conformation. Multiple complementary techniques should be employed:

For detailed structural analysis, X-ray crystallography or NMR spectroscopy could be employed, similar to structural studies performed on RRF from E. coli and T. thermophilus .

What in vitro assays can accurately measure recombinant Marinomonas sp. RRF activity?

Several complementary assays can be employed to measure the activity of recombinant Marinomonas sp. RRF:

Assay TypeMethodologyMeasured ParametersRequired Components
Ribosome Splitting AssayLight scatteringDissociation of 70S ribosomes into subunitsPurified 70S ribosomes, RRF, EF-G, GTP
Polysome Disassembly AssaySucrose gradient ultracentrifugationConversion of polysomes to monosomes and subunitsIsolated polysomes, RRF, EF-G, GTP
Translation Termination/Recycling AssayScintillation counting or fluorescenceComplete recycling processTranslation components, labeled substrates
GTPase Activation AssayPhosphate release measurementStimulation of EF-G GTPase activityRRF, EF-G, GTP, phosphate detection system

These assays require purified components, including RRF, EF-G, GTP, and ribosomes. While homologous ribosomes are preferable, cross-species activity is often observed, as noted in the case of T. thermophilus RRF functioning on E. coli ribosomes .

How do environmental factors affect the activity of Marinomonas sp. RRF?

As a marine bacterium, Marinomonas sp. and its proteins, including RRF, have likely evolved adaptations to marine conditions. Environmental factors affecting RRF activity should be systematically investigated:

Environmental FactorExpected Optimal RangeExperimental ApproachSignificance
Salt Concentration0.3-0.5 M NaClActivity assays at varying salt concentrationsAdaptation to marine environment
Temperature15-25°CTemperature gradient activity profilingAdaptation to marine temperature ranges
pH7.5-8.5 (seawater range)pH gradient activity profilingAdaptation to marine pH
Mg²⁺ Concentration5-10 mMTitration experimentsCritical for ribosome-RRF interaction
PressureAmbient to 10 MPaHigh-pressure chamber experimentsRelevant for depth adaptation

Since RRF functions in ribosome splitting, structural stability under various conditions can be assessed through monitoring its ability to dissociate 70S ribosomes in conjunction with EF-G. These experiments would reveal adaptations that allow efficient translation in marine environments.

How do mutations in conserved domains affect Marinomonas sp. RRF function?

Mutations in conserved domains would likely significantly impact RRF function. Based on structure-function studies of RRF and related proteins, the following effects can be predicted:

Domain/RegionMutation TypeExpected Functional ImpactExperimental Approach
Domain II (S12 interaction)SubstitutionDisrupted interaction with 30S subunit Ribosome binding assays
H69 interaction regionDeletion/SubstitutionImpaired ability to induce conformational changes Structural studies, splitting assays
EF-G interaction surfaceSubstitutionReduced cooperation with EF-GGTPase activation assays
Conserved domains 5-6DeletionComplete loss of function, as observed in other proteins Gene knockout/complementation

A systematic mutational analysis approach could involve creating point mutations or domain deletions in recombinant Marinomonas sp. RRF, followed by functional assays to assess impact on activity. The approach described for creating the SB1 strain (search result ) provides a model for disrupting conserved domains through homologous recombination.

What is the most effective method for cloning the frr gene from Marinomonas sp.?

Based on successful approaches for cloning genes from marine bacteria, particularly Marinomonas mediterranea , the following strategy is recommended:

  • Genomic DNA Extraction: Use a protocol optimized for marine bacteria, potentially including additional salt removal steps.

  • PCR Amplification: Design primers based on conserved regions of frr genes from related bacteria. A two-step PCR approach with varying annealing temperatures (10 cycles at 44°C followed by 33 cycles at 48°C) proved successful for amplifying a gene from M. mediterranea .

  • Cloning and Sequencing: Clone the PCR product into a vector suitable for both sequencing and expression, such as pGEM-T . Sequence the cloned gene in both directions to ensure accuracy.

  • Expression Vector Construction: After sequence verification, subclone the frr gene into an appropriate expression vector, incorporating necessary regulatory elements and purification tags.

This approach leverages both general molecular biology principles and specific successful methods used for cloning genes from Marinomonas species.

How can researchers develop conditional frr mutants in Marinomonas sp.?

Developing frr mutants requires special consideration since frr is likely essential, as demonstrated in E. coli . Based on approaches described in the literature, researchers could:

  • Temperature-Sensitive Mutants: Create a strain carrying a frame-shifted chromosomal frr and wild-type frr on a temperature-sensitive plasmid, similar to the E. coli strain MC1061-2 .

  • Suicide Vector Approach: Use a suicide vector containing a fragment of the frr gene for insertional mutagenesis through homologous recombination, as described for other genes in M. mediterranea .

  • Domain Disruption Strategy: Create partial loss-of-function mutants by disrupting specific conserved domains. This approach involves digesting a plasmid containing the frr gene with restriction enzymes that cut within conserved domains (such as the fifth and sixth conserved domains), creating a deletion, and using this construct for homologous recombination .

  • Verification of Essentiality: Test whether thermoresistant colonies derived from conditional mutants carry wild-type frr either in the bacterial chromosome (by re-exchange) or on plasmids that became temperature-resistant, as observed with E. coli frr mutants .

What advanced techniques can be used to study frr regulation in Marinomonas sp.?

Understanding frr regulation requires a combination of molecular and systems biology approaches:

TechniqueApplicationExpected OutcomeTechnical Considerations
RNA-SeqTranscriptome-wide expression analysisIdentification of frr expression patterns under different conditionsRequires high-quality RNA extraction protocols optimized for marine bacteria
Ribosome ProfilingTranslation-level regulationInsights into translational efficiency of frr Requires specialized protocols for flash-freezing and ribosome isolation
Promoter Fusion AssaysPromoter activity measurementIdentification of regulatory elements affecting frr expressionReporter genes must function in marine bacterial systems
ChIP-SeqIdentification of transcription factor bindingMapping of regulatory proteins that control frr expressionRequires antibodies against potential regulatory proteins
CRISPR InterferencePartial gene knockdownStudy of frr function while maintaining cell viabilityMust optimize for marine bacterial transformation

These approaches would provide insights into how frr expression is regulated in response to different environmental conditions or growth phases in Marinomonas sp.

How can recombinant Marinomonas sp. RRF be used to study marine-specific translation adaptations?

Recombinant Marinomonas sp. RRF provides a valuable tool for studying marine-specific adaptations in translation mechanisms:

  • Comparative Biochemical Studies: Compare the biochemical properties of Marinomonas sp. RRF with those from non-marine bacteria to identify marine-specific adaptations in stability, activity, and interactions.

  • Cross-Species Functionality Tests: Determine whether Marinomonas sp. RRF can function with ribosomes from non-marine bacteria (and vice versa). Such cross-functionality has been observed between T. thermophilus RRF and E. coli ribosomes .

  • Structural Studies: Obtain crystal structures of Marinomonas sp. RRF alone and in complex with ribosomes to identify marine-specific structural adaptations, similar to the structural studies of RRF from other bacteria binding to ribosomes .

  • Cold Adaptation Analysis: Study how Marinomonas sp. RRF functions at low temperatures compared to RRFs from mesophilic bacteria to reveal adaptations for translation in cold marine environments.

These approaches would contribute to our understanding of how translation processes have adapted to marine environments and could reveal novel mechanisms of protein-ribosome interactions.

What experimental approaches can reveal interactions between Marinomonas sp. RRF and other marine translation factors?

Several experimental approaches can be used to study interactions between Marinomonas sp. RRF and other translation factors:

ApproachMethodologyExpected OutcomesAdvantages/Limitations
Pull-Down AssaysAffinity purification followed by mass spectrometryIdentification of interacting partnersMay identify novel marine-specific interactions
Surface Plasmon ResonanceReal-time binding kinetics measurementQuantitative binding parameters between RRF and EF-GRequires purified components
Cryo-Electron MicroscopyVisualization of macromolecular complexesStructural details of RRF-ribosome-EF-G complexesCan reveal conformation changes upon binding
Genetic Suppressor AnalysisIdentification of mutations that suppress RRF mutant phenotypesFunctional interaction networkLabor intensive but reveals functional relationships

These approaches would help map the interaction network of Marinomonas sp. RRF and identify any unique interactions specific to marine bacteria that may represent adaptations to marine environments.

How does marine environmental variability affect RRF function in Marinomonas sp.?

Understanding how RRF function in Marinomonas sp. responds to changing marine conditions requires systematic studies under various environmental parameters:

  • Temperature Fluctuations: Marine environments experience temperature variations; studying RRF function across a temperature range (4-30°C) would reveal adaptations for thermal flexibility.

  • Salinity Changes: Testing RRF activity across a range of salinities would show how coastal Marinomonas species adapt to fluctuating salt concentrations.

  • Oxygen Availability: Many marine environments experience oxygen stratification. Examining how RRF function changes under aerobic versus microaerobic conditions would reveal adaptations to such fluctuations.

  • Nutrient Limitation: Studying RRF expression and function during nutrient limitation versus replete conditions could reveal regulatory mechanisms that optimize translation efficiency under stress.

  • pH Variations: Investigating RRF function across pH ranges relevant to marine environments, including future ocean acidification scenarios, would reveal adaptations or vulnerabilities to pH changes.

These studies would provide insights into how translation recycling in Marinomonas sp. is adapted to function optimally within the variable conditions of marine ecosystems.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.