Recombinant Mesoplasma florum 50S ribosomal protein L33 1 (rpmG1)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder

Note: We will prioritize shipment of the format currently in stock. However, if you require a specific format, please specify this in your order notes. We will fulfill your request to the best of our ability.

Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.

Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless otherwise requested. Dry ice shipping is available upon request with additional charges. Please contact us in advance to arrange this.

Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Before opening, briefly centrifuge the vial to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is recommended for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process.

Tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.

Synonyms
rpmG1; Mfl08950S ribosomal protein L33 1
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-54
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Mesoplasma florum (strain ATCC 33453 / NBRC 100688 / NCTC 11704 / L1) (Acholeplasma florum)
Target Names
rpmG1
Target Protein Sequence
MHKTKSTRKI ILVCEDCLSR NYSLNKSNLT QKERLEIKKF CSMCNKHTLH KETR
Uniprot No.

Q&A

Basic Research Questions

  • What is the function of rpmG1 in Mesoplasma florum cellular processes?

    The 50S ribosomal protein L33 1 (rpmG1) in Mesoplasma florum is a component of the large subunit (50S) of the bacterial ribosome, involved in the translation process. It belongs to the bacterial ribosomal protein bL33 family . Unlike some essential ribosomal proteins, studies on homologous L33 proteins in other organisms suggest it may not be required for efficient translation under standard conditions but becomes important under specific stress conditions .

    In M. florum, a near-minimal bacterium with approximately 800 kb genome, rpmG1 is part of the core translational machinery. The protein is encoded by the rpmG gene (YP_053329.1) and is one of the approximately 680 protein-coding sequences in this organism . While the specific function of rpmG1 in M. florum has not been extensively characterized, comparative studies with related proteins suggest it plays a role in maintaining ribosomal structural integrity and may contribute to translation efficiency under certain physiological conditions.

  • What are the structural characteristics and sequence details of rpmG1?

    The recombinant rpmG1 from Mesoplasma florum has the following structural characteristics:

    • Full protein length: 54 amino acids

    • UniProt accession number: Q6F228

    • The protein belongs to the bacterial ribosomal protein bL33 family

    Unlike many ribosomal proteins that form regular secondary structures, L33 proteins often contain zinc-binding motifs characterized by cysteine residues (as seen in the sequence at positions 15, 18, 46, and 49 - CZXC...CXXC pattern). These cysteines are involved in coordinating a zinc ion, which contributes to the structural stability of the protein and potentially its interactions with ribosomal RNA.

  • How can researchers design experiments to study rpmG1 function in Mesoplasma florum?

    To effectively study rpmG1 function in M. florum, researchers should consider the following experimental design strategies:

    1. Control for batch effects: As highlighted in experimental design principles , researchers must minimize confounding variables by:

      • Processing all samples simultaneously when possible

      • Using blocking and randomization techniques

      • Including appropriate controls for each experimental batch

    2. Temperature variation studies: Based on findings with homologous L33 proteins , experiments should include:

      • Control conditions (optimal temperature for M. florum is 34°C)

      • Cold stress conditions (based on findings that L33 may be important under low temperature)

      • Recovery phases after stress exposure

    3. Translation efficiency assays: Measure protein synthesis rates using:

      • Polysome profiling to assess ribosome loading on mRNAs

      • Pulse-chase experiments with radioactive amino acids

      • Ribosome half-mer analysis to detect subunit joining defects

    4. Genetic manipulation approaches:

      • Use the available oriC-based plasmids developed for M. florum

      • Consider tetracycline, puromycin, or spectinomycin/streptomycin resistance markers for selection

      • Account for the tendency of oriC plasmids to recombine with the host chromosome

    A well-designed factorial experiment should include multiple time points, temperature conditions, and appropriate controls to detect potential phenotypes that may only manifest under specific conditions.

Advanced Research Questions

  • How does rpmG1 compare functionally with homologous proteins in other bacterial species and organelles?

    Comparative functional analysis of rpmG1 reveals interesting evolutionary patterns:

    Organism/OrganelleProteinEssentialityFunctional RoleReference
    Mesoplasma florumrpmG1Not fully characterizedTranslation component
    Plant chloroplastsRPL33Non-essential under normal conditionsRequired during cold stress recovery
    Saccharomyces cerevisiaeL33ARequired for normal growthCritical for ribosome biogenesis

    The most informative comparison comes from studies of chloroplast RPL33 in plants, where knockout experiments demonstrated that while RPL33 is dispensable under standard conditions, plants lacking this protein show severely compromised recovery when exposed to low temperature stress . This suggests a specialized role in maintaining translation capacity under stress conditions.

    Unlike RPL33, other ribosomal proteins like RPS2, RPS4, and RPL20 are essential for cell survival , indicating functional differentiation among ribosomal proteins. When RPL33 was deleted in plant chloroplasts, polysome loading analyses showed subtle differences in ribosome association with various transcripts, including psbA, rbcL, psaA/B, and psbE . This suggests that while translation proceeds in the absence of L33, there may be reduced efficiency under certain conditions.

    These comparative studies provide a framework for understanding the potential specialized role of rpmG1 in M. florum adaptation to environmental stresses.

  • What methodologies are most effective for studying protein-protein interactions involving rpmG1?

    To study protein-protein interactions involving rpmG1, researchers should employ the following complementary approaches:

    1. Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) studies:

      • Use antibodies against rpmG1 or potential interacting partners

      • Consider cross-linking techniques to capture transient interactions

      • Verify specificity with appropriate controls including pre-immune serum

    2. Proximity labeling approaches:

      • BioID or APEX2 fusion proteins for in vivo proximity labeling

      • MS-based identification of labeled proteins

      • Comparative analysis across different growth conditions

    3. Cryo-EM structural studies:

      • Utilize cryo-electron microscopy to visualize rpmG1 within intact ribosomes

      • Compare structures under different conditions (e.g., temperature, antibiotic presence)

      • Map interaction interfaces at near-atomic resolution

    4. In vitro reconstitution assays:

      • Purify recombinant rpmG1 and potential interacting partners

      • Use size exclusion chromatography, isothermal titration calorimetry, or surface plasmon resonance

      • Validate interactions with mutational analysis

    5. Two-hybrid or split reporter systems:

      • Bacterial two-hybrid systems adapted for M. florum

      • Split-GFP complementation assays

      • Controls for spontaneous reporter activation

    When designing these experiments, researchers should be mindful of the challenges inherent to working with small ribosomal proteins, including potential cross-reactivity of antibodies and the transient nature of some interactions within the ribosome assembly pathway.

  • How can researchers interpret contradictory data regarding rpmG1 function in different experimental systems?

    When faced with contradictory data regarding rpmG1 function, researchers should apply the following analytical framework:

    1. Evaluate experimental design differences:

      • Compare growth conditions, especially temperature (optimal for M. florum is 34°C)

      • Assess media composition variations that might affect translation demands

      • Examine batch effects and potential confounding variables

    2. Consider organism-specific context:

      • M. florum has a minimal genome (~800kb) with potentially less functional redundancy

      • Comparative analysis with homologs should account for genomic context

      • Evaluate differences in translational machinery between organisms

    3. Analyze methodological variations:

      • Detection sensitivity differences (Western blot vs. mass spectrometry)

      • Ribosome isolation protocols may differentially preserve certain interactions

      • Expression systems may introduce artifacts (e.g., protein tags affecting function)

    4. Statistical assessment:

      • Re-analyze raw data with appropriate statistical tests

      • Consider sample size limitations and potential outliers

      • Apply multiple hypothesis correction when appropriate

    5. Integration through computational modeling:

      • Develop kinetic models of ribosome assembly with and without rpmG1

      • Simulate conditions that might reveal conditional phenotypes

      • Use network analysis to identify compensatory pathways

    A particularly instructive example comes from research on chloroplast RPL33, where plants showed no visible phenotype under standard greenhouse conditions when RPL33 was deleted, but exhibited severe compromised recovery following cold stress exposure . This demonstrates how condition-specific functions might be missed in standard laboratory conditions.

Methodological Considerations

  • What are the optimal conditions for expression and purification of recombinant rpmG1?

    Based on available information about recombinant rpmG1 and similar ribosomal proteins, the following expression and purification protocol is recommended:

    Expression System:

    • Host: E. coli BL21(DE3) strain

    • Vector: pET-based expression vectors with T7 promoter

    • Gene: Codon-optimized rpmG1 sequence for E. coli expression

    • Induction: 0.5-1.0 mM IPTG at OD₆₀₀ = 0.6-0.8

    • Post-induction: 4-6 hours at 30°C (reduced temperature to enhance solubility)

    Purification Strategy:

    1. Cell lysis: Sonication in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 1 mM DTT

    2. Initial purification: Ni-NTA affinity chromatography for His-tagged protein

    3. Tag removal: TEV protease cleavage if tag-free protein is required

    4. Polish purification: Size exclusion chromatography using Superdex 75

    5. Quality control: SDS-PAGE analysis (expected apparent MW: ~10 kDa)

    6. Storage: 50% glycerol at -20°C/-80°C for extended shelf life

    Critical Considerations:

    • Ribosomal proteins tend to be basic and may bind nucleic acids; include RNase treatment

    • Include zinc (10-50 μM ZnCl₂) in buffers to maintain structural integrity of zinc-finger motifs

    • Verify protein folding using circular dichroism spectroscopy

    • Assess functionality through in vitro translation assays or ribosome reconstitution experiments

  • How can researchers design knockout studies to assess rpmG1 essentiality?

    Designing knockout studies for rpmG1 in M. florum requires careful consideration of several factors:

    1. Genetic tools available for M. florum:

      • Use established transformation methods: polyethylene glycol-mediated transformation (frequency ~4.1 × 10⁻⁶ transformants per viable cell), electroporation (up to 7.87 × 10⁻⁶), or conjugation from E. coli (8.44 × 10⁻⁷)

      • Utilize antibiotic resistance markers: tetracycline, puromycin, or spectinomycin/streptomycin

      • Account for plasmid recombination with genomic DNA

    2. Experimental design considerations:

      • Create conditional knockouts if rpmG1 proves essential

      • Include complementation controls to verify phenotype specificity

      • Test under multiple growth conditions, especially temperature variations

      • Use appropriate statistical design to account for batch effects

    3. Phenotypic analyses:

      • Growth rate measurements at different temperatures

      • Polysome profiling to assess translation efficiency

      • Ribosome assembly analysis by sucrose gradient centrifugation

      • Stress recovery assays (based on findings with homologous proteins)

    4. Data analysis framework:

      • Quantify growth rates and correlate with rpmG1 expression levels

      • Apply principal component analysis to identify major sources of variation

      • Use hierarchical clustering to identify genes with similar expression patterns

      • Establish causality through rescue experiments

    Based on studies with homologous proteins in other systems, researchers should be particularly attentive to condition-specific phenotypes, as rpmG1 might be dispensable under standard laboratory conditions but required under specific stress conditions .

  • What are the challenges and solutions for studying rpmG1 in the context of synthetic biology applications?

    Using rpmG1 in synthetic biology applications presents several challenges and potential solutions:

    ChallengeDescriptionMethodological Solutions
    Expression optimizationEnsuring correct expression levels in heterologous systemsUse inducible promoters with fine-tuned control; employ ribosome binding site libraries to optimize translation initiation
    Functional validationConfirming that synthetic rpmG1 integrates properly into ribosomesDevelop ribosome assembly reporter systems; use cryo-EM to visualize integration
    Chassis compatibilityEnsuring compatibility with the chosen synthetic biology chassisConsider codon optimization for the specific chassis ; test in multiple genetic backgrounds
    Stress toleranceEngineering stress resistance through rpmG1 modificationsCreate libraries of rpmG1 variants; screen under stress conditions based on findings in other systems
    Integration with minimal genome designsDetermining essentiality in reduced genome contextsUse genome-scale models to predict effects; validate with incremental genome reduction strategies

    M. florum itself represents an attractive model for synthetic biology due to its near-minimal genome (~800 kb), fast growth rate, and lack of pathogenic potential . The development of genetic tools including oriC-based plasmids and transformation methods provides a foundation for engineering this organism.

    For integration of rpmG1 into synthetic biology applications, researchers can build upon the existing collection of 573 protein-coding sequences from M. florum that have been standardized for MoClo assembly and codon-optimized for E. coli . This enables modular assembly of synthetic gene circuits incorporating rpmG1 and potential regulatory elements.

  • How should researchers analyze the absolute molecular abundance of rpmG1 in different cellular states?

    To accurately analyze absolute molecular abundance of rpmG1 across different cellular states, researchers should employ the following methodological framework:

    1. Sample preparation considerations:

      • Use rapid harvesting techniques to capture true in vivo states

      • Apply consistent extraction protocols across all conditions

      • Include spike-in standards for normalization across samples

    2. Quantification methods:

      • Absolute quantification using selected reaction monitoring (SRM) or parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) mass spectrometry

      • Western blotting with recombinant protein standards for calibration curves

      • Ribosome profiling to assess translation efficiency

      • RNA-seq for transcriptional analysis

    3. Data analysis approach:

      • Convert expression data to absolute molecular counts using biomass measurements

      • Apply appropriate statistical methods for comparing across conditions

      • Generate stoichiometric models of ribosome components

    4. Visualization and interpretation:

      • Plot absolute abundance across conditions with appropriate error bars

      • Compare with abundances of other ribosomal proteins to identify stoichiometric imbalances

      • Correlate changes with physiological parameters

    Studies on M. florum have already established approaches for determining absolute molecular abundances of RNA and protein species, including components of protein complexes such as ribosomes . These methodologies can be applied specifically to rpmG1 to understand its expression dynamics under different conditions, particularly in response to stress factors where homologous proteins show condition-specific importance .

Research Technologies and Applications

  • What are the current applications of rpmG1 in structural biology research?

    rpmG1 offers several valuable applications in structural biology research:

    1. Cryo-EM studies of ribosome assembly:

      • Using labeled rpmG1 to track incorporation into nascent ribosomes

      • Comparing structures with and without rpmG1 to identify conformational changes

      • Studying dynamics of assembly intermediates

    2. Protein-RNA interaction models:

      • Mapping binding interfaces between rpmG1 and ribosomal RNA

      • Characterizing the role of zinc-binding motifs in structural stability

      • Identifying critical residues through mutational analysis

    3. Minimal ribosome design:

      • Using M. florum rpmG1 as a component in efforts to design minimal functional ribosomes

      • Testing whether rpmG1 can be simplified further while maintaining function

      • Engineering ribosomes with novel properties through rpmG1 modifications

    4. Evolutionary structural biology:

      • Comparing rpmG1 structure across diverse bacterial species

      • Identifying conserved structural features versus species-specific adaptations

      • Reconstructing ancestral sequences to study ribosome evolution

    The small size and relatively simple structure of rpmG1 make it an excellent model system for studying protein-RNA interactions within large macromolecular complexes like ribosomes. The availability of recombinant rpmG1 facilitates these studies by providing material for structural analyses outside the context of the complete ribosome.

  • How can researchers study the role of rpmG1 in antibiotic resistance mechanisms?

    To study rpmG1's potential role in antibiotic resistance mechanisms, researchers should implement the following approaches:

    1. Susceptibility testing with ribosome-targeting antibiotics:

      • Determine MIC values using broth microdilution method

      • Test multiple classes of ribosome-targeting antibiotics (tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, macrolides)

      • Compare wild-type vs. rpmG1-modified strains

    2. Structural studies of antibiotic binding:

      • Use cryo-EM to visualize potential conformational changes in the presence of antibiotics

      • Perform in silico docking studies to predict antibiotic binding sites near rpmG1

      • Design mutations to test predictions about resistance mechanisms

    3. Genetic approaches:

      • Generate libraries of rpmG1 variants and select for antibiotic resistance

      • Perform complementation studies using rpmG1 from resistant organisms

      • Use CRISPR interference to modulate rpmG1 expression levels and assess impact on resistance

    4. Biochemical assays:

      • Measure translation rates in the presence of antibiotics

      • Compare ribosome assembly with and without rpmG1 under antibiotic stress

      • Characterize potential protective modifications to rpmG1

    5. Resistance development monitoring:

      • Conduct long-term evolution experiments under antibiotic selection

      • Sequence rpmG1 and surrounding regions to identify adaptive mutations

      • Correlate molecular changes with resistance phenotypes

    Studies on M. florum antibiotic susceptibility have shown resistance to ampicillin, rifampin, sulfamethoxazole, and trimethoprim, with MICs above 100 μg/ml, while showing sensitivity to chloramphenicol, erythromycin, and puromycin . This baseline susceptibility profile provides a foundation for studies investigating how modifications to ribosomal proteins like rpmG1 might alter resistance patterns.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.