Note: We will prioritize shipment of the format currently in stock. However, if you require a specific format, please specify this in your order notes. We will fulfill your request to the best of our ability.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless otherwise requested. Dry ice shipping is available upon request with additional charges. Please contact us in advance to arrange this.
Tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
What is the function of rpmG1 in Mesoplasma florum cellular processes?
The 50S ribosomal protein L33 1 (rpmG1) in Mesoplasma florum is a component of the large subunit (50S) of the bacterial ribosome, involved in the translation process. It belongs to the bacterial ribosomal protein bL33 family . Unlike some essential ribosomal proteins, studies on homologous L33 proteins in other organisms suggest it may not be required for efficient translation under standard conditions but becomes important under specific stress conditions .
In M. florum, a near-minimal bacterium with approximately 800 kb genome, rpmG1 is part of the core translational machinery. The protein is encoded by the rpmG gene (YP_053329.1) and is one of the approximately 680 protein-coding sequences in this organism . While the specific function of rpmG1 in M. florum has not been extensively characterized, comparative studies with related proteins suggest it plays a role in maintaining ribosomal structural integrity and may contribute to translation efficiency under certain physiological conditions.
What are the structural characteristics and sequence details of rpmG1?
The recombinant rpmG1 from Mesoplasma florum has the following structural characteristics:
Full protein length: 54 amino acids
The protein belongs to the bacterial ribosomal protein bL33 family
Unlike many ribosomal proteins that form regular secondary structures, L33 proteins often contain zinc-binding motifs characterized by cysteine residues (as seen in the sequence at positions 15, 18, 46, and 49 - CZXC...CXXC pattern). These cysteines are involved in coordinating a zinc ion, which contributes to the structural stability of the protein and potentially its interactions with ribosomal RNA.
How can researchers design experiments to study rpmG1 function in Mesoplasma florum?
To effectively study rpmG1 function in M. florum, researchers should consider the following experimental design strategies:
Control for batch effects: As highlighted in experimental design principles , researchers must minimize confounding variables by:
Processing all samples simultaneously when possible
Using blocking and randomization techniques
Including appropriate controls for each experimental batch
Temperature variation studies: Based on findings with homologous L33 proteins , experiments should include:
Translation efficiency assays: Measure protein synthesis rates using:
Polysome profiling to assess ribosome loading on mRNAs
Pulse-chase experiments with radioactive amino acids
Ribosome half-mer analysis to detect subunit joining defects
Genetic manipulation approaches:
A well-designed factorial experiment should include multiple time points, temperature conditions, and appropriate controls to detect potential phenotypes that may only manifest under specific conditions.
How does rpmG1 compare functionally with homologous proteins in other bacterial species and organelles?
Comparative functional analysis of rpmG1 reveals interesting evolutionary patterns:
The most informative comparison comes from studies of chloroplast RPL33 in plants, where knockout experiments demonstrated that while RPL33 is dispensable under standard conditions, plants lacking this protein show severely compromised recovery when exposed to low temperature stress . This suggests a specialized role in maintaining translation capacity under stress conditions.
Unlike RPL33, other ribosomal proteins like RPS2, RPS4, and RPL20 are essential for cell survival , indicating functional differentiation among ribosomal proteins. When RPL33 was deleted in plant chloroplasts, polysome loading analyses showed subtle differences in ribosome association with various transcripts, including psbA, rbcL, psaA/B, and psbE . This suggests that while translation proceeds in the absence of L33, there may be reduced efficiency under certain conditions.
These comparative studies provide a framework for understanding the potential specialized role of rpmG1 in M. florum adaptation to environmental stresses.
What methodologies are most effective for studying protein-protein interactions involving rpmG1?
To study protein-protein interactions involving rpmG1, researchers should employ the following complementary approaches:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) studies:
Use antibodies against rpmG1 or potential interacting partners
Consider cross-linking techniques to capture transient interactions
Verify specificity with appropriate controls including pre-immune serum
Proximity labeling approaches:
BioID or APEX2 fusion proteins for in vivo proximity labeling
MS-based identification of labeled proteins
Comparative analysis across different growth conditions
Cryo-EM structural studies:
Utilize cryo-electron microscopy to visualize rpmG1 within intact ribosomes
Compare structures under different conditions (e.g., temperature, antibiotic presence)
Map interaction interfaces at near-atomic resolution
In vitro reconstitution assays:
Purify recombinant rpmG1 and potential interacting partners
Use size exclusion chromatography, isothermal titration calorimetry, or surface plasmon resonance
Validate interactions with mutational analysis
Two-hybrid or split reporter systems:
Bacterial two-hybrid systems adapted for M. florum
Split-GFP complementation assays
Controls for spontaneous reporter activation
When designing these experiments, researchers should be mindful of the challenges inherent to working with small ribosomal proteins, including potential cross-reactivity of antibodies and the transient nature of some interactions within the ribosome assembly pathway.
How can researchers interpret contradictory data regarding rpmG1 function in different experimental systems?
When faced with contradictory data regarding rpmG1 function, researchers should apply the following analytical framework:
Evaluate experimental design differences:
Consider organism-specific context:
Analyze methodological variations:
Detection sensitivity differences (Western blot vs. mass spectrometry)
Ribosome isolation protocols may differentially preserve certain interactions
Expression systems may introduce artifacts (e.g., protein tags affecting function)
Statistical assessment:
Re-analyze raw data with appropriate statistical tests
Consider sample size limitations and potential outliers
Apply multiple hypothesis correction when appropriate
Integration through computational modeling:
Develop kinetic models of ribosome assembly with and without rpmG1
Simulate conditions that might reveal conditional phenotypes
Use network analysis to identify compensatory pathways
A particularly instructive example comes from research on chloroplast RPL33, where plants showed no visible phenotype under standard greenhouse conditions when RPL33 was deleted, but exhibited severe compromised recovery following cold stress exposure . This demonstrates how condition-specific functions might be missed in standard laboratory conditions.
What are the optimal conditions for expression and purification of recombinant rpmG1?
Based on available information about recombinant rpmG1 and similar ribosomal proteins, the following expression and purification protocol is recommended:
Expression System:
Vector: pET-based expression vectors with T7 promoter
Induction: 0.5-1.0 mM IPTG at OD₆₀₀ = 0.6-0.8
Post-induction: 4-6 hours at 30°C (reduced temperature to enhance solubility)
Purification Strategy:
Cell lysis: Sonication in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 1 mM DTT
Initial purification: Ni-NTA affinity chromatography for His-tagged protein
Tag removal: TEV protease cleavage if tag-free protein is required
Polish purification: Size exclusion chromatography using Superdex 75
Quality control: SDS-PAGE analysis (expected apparent MW: ~10 kDa)
Storage: 50% glycerol at -20°C/-80°C for extended shelf life
Critical Considerations:
Ribosomal proteins tend to be basic and may bind nucleic acids; include RNase treatment
Include zinc (10-50 μM ZnCl₂) in buffers to maintain structural integrity of zinc-finger motifs
Verify protein folding using circular dichroism spectroscopy
Assess functionality through in vitro translation assays or ribosome reconstitution experiments
How can researchers design knockout studies to assess rpmG1 essentiality?
Designing knockout studies for rpmG1 in M. florum requires careful consideration of several factors:
Genetic tools available for M. florum:
Use established transformation methods: polyethylene glycol-mediated transformation (frequency ~4.1 × 10⁻⁶ transformants per viable cell), electroporation (up to 7.87 × 10⁻⁶), or conjugation from E. coli (8.44 × 10⁻⁷)
Utilize antibiotic resistance markers: tetracycline, puromycin, or spectinomycin/streptomycin
Experimental design considerations:
Phenotypic analyses:
Data analysis framework:
Quantify growth rates and correlate with rpmG1 expression levels
Apply principal component analysis to identify major sources of variation
Use hierarchical clustering to identify genes with similar expression patterns
Establish causality through rescue experiments
Based on studies with homologous proteins in other systems, researchers should be particularly attentive to condition-specific phenotypes, as rpmG1 might be dispensable under standard laboratory conditions but required under specific stress conditions .
What are the challenges and solutions for studying rpmG1 in the context of synthetic biology applications?
Using rpmG1 in synthetic biology applications presents several challenges and potential solutions:
M. florum itself represents an attractive model for synthetic biology due to its near-minimal genome (~800 kb), fast growth rate, and lack of pathogenic potential . The development of genetic tools including oriC-based plasmids and transformation methods provides a foundation for engineering this organism.
For integration of rpmG1 into synthetic biology applications, researchers can build upon the existing collection of 573 protein-coding sequences from M. florum that have been standardized for MoClo assembly and codon-optimized for E. coli . This enables modular assembly of synthetic gene circuits incorporating rpmG1 and potential regulatory elements.
How should researchers analyze the absolute molecular abundance of rpmG1 in different cellular states?
To accurately analyze absolute molecular abundance of rpmG1 across different cellular states, researchers should employ the following methodological framework:
Sample preparation considerations:
Use rapid harvesting techniques to capture true in vivo states
Apply consistent extraction protocols across all conditions
Include spike-in standards for normalization across samples
Quantification methods:
Absolute quantification using selected reaction monitoring (SRM) or parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) mass spectrometry
Western blotting with recombinant protein standards for calibration curves
Ribosome profiling to assess translation efficiency
RNA-seq for transcriptional analysis
Data analysis approach:
Convert expression data to absolute molecular counts using biomass measurements
Apply appropriate statistical methods for comparing across conditions
Generate stoichiometric models of ribosome components
Visualization and interpretation:
Plot absolute abundance across conditions with appropriate error bars
Compare with abundances of other ribosomal proteins to identify stoichiometric imbalances
Correlate changes with physiological parameters
Studies on M. florum have already established approaches for determining absolute molecular abundances of RNA and protein species, including components of protein complexes such as ribosomes . These methodologies can be applied specifically to rpmG1 to understand its expression dynamics under different conditions, particularly in response to stress factors where homologous proteins show condition-specific importance .
What are the current applications of rpmG1 in structural biology research?
rpmG1 offers several valuable applications in structural biology research:
Cryo-EM studies of ribosome assembly:
Using labeled rpmG1 to track incorporation into nascent ribosomes
Comparing structures with and without rpmG1 to identify conformational changes
Studying dynamics of assembly intermediates
Protein-RNA interaction models:
Mapping binding interfaces between rpmG1 and ribosomal RNA
Characterizing the role of zinc-binding motifs in structural stability
Identifying critical residues through mutational analysis
Minimal ribosome design:
Using M. florum rpmG1 as a component in efforts to design minimal functional ribosomes
Testing whether rpmG1 can be simplified further while maintaining function
Engineering ribosomes with novel properties through rpmG1 modifications
Evolutionary structural biology:
Comparing rpmG1 structure across diverse bacterial species
Identifying conserved structural features versus species-specific adaptations
Reconstructing ancestral sequences to study ribosome evolution
The small size and relatively simple structure of rpmG1 make it an excellent model system for studying protein-RNA interactions within large macromolecular complexes like ribosomes. The availability of recombinant rpmG1 facilitates these studies by providing material for structural analyses outside the context of the complete ribosome.
How can researchers study the role of rpmG1 in antibiotic resistance mechanisms?
To study rpmG1's potential role in antibiotic resistance mechanisms, researchers should implement the following approaches:
Susceptibility testing with ribosome-targeting antibiotics:
Structural studies of antibiotic binding:
Use cryo-EM to visualize potential conformational changes in the presence of antibiotics
Perform in silico docking studies to predict antibiotic binding sites near rpmG1
Design mutations to test predictions about resistance mechanisms
Genetic approaches:
Generate libraries of rpmG1 variants and select for antibiotic resistance
Perform complementation studies using rpmG1 from resistant organisms
Use CRISPR interference to modulate rpmG1 expression levels and assess impact on resistance
Biochemical assays:
Measure translation rates in the presence of antibiotics
Compare ribosome assembly with and without rpmG1 under antibiotic stress
Characterize potential protective modifications to rpmG1
Resistance development monitoring:
Conduct long-term evolution experiments under antibiotic selection
Sequence rpmG1 and surrounding regions to identify adaptive mutations
Correlate molecular changes with resistance phenotypes
Studies on M. florum antibiotic susceptibility have shown resistance to ampicillin, rifampin, sulfamethoxazole, and trimethoprim, with MICs above 100 μg/ml, while showing sensitivity to chloramphenicol, erythromycin, and puromycin . This baseline susceptibility profile provides a foundation for studies investigating how modifications to ribosomal proteins like rpmG1 might alter resistance patterns.