Recombinant Monodelphis domestica Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L1 (UCHL1)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the available format, but you can specify your preference when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary. Consult local distributors for specifics. Proteins are shipped with blue ice packs. Request dry ice in advance (extra fees apply).
Notes
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer, temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form: 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form: 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon arrival. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
UCHL1Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L1; UCH-L1; EC 3.4.19.12; Neuron cytoplasmic protein 9.5; PGP 9.5; PGP9.5; Ubiquitin thioesterase L1
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-223
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Monodelphis domestica (Gray short-tailed opossum)
Target Names
UCHL1
Target Protein Sequence
MQLKPMEINP EMLNKVLTRL GVGGDWKFVD VLGLEEDVLG TVPAPACALL LLFPLTAQHE NFRKKQIEEL KGQEVSPKVY FMKQTVGNSC GTIGLIHAVA NNQDKLNFDD GSVLKQFISE TAKLSPEDRA KCFEKNEAIQ AAHDAVAQEG QCRVDDEVNF HFILFNNVDG HLYELDGRMP FPINHGSNSD ESVLKGAAEI CRQFTEREEG EVRFSAVALC KCA
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Ubiquitin-protein hydrolase involved in processing ubiquitin precursors and ubiquitinated proteins. This thiol protease hydrolyzes a peptide bond at ubiquitin's C-terminal glycine. It also binds free monoubiquitin, potentially preventing lysosomal degradation. The homodimer may have ATP-independent ubiquitin ligase activity.
Database Links
Protein Families
Peptidase C12 family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm. Endoplasmic reticulum membrane; Lipid-anchor.

Q&A

What are the basic structural and functional characteristics of UCHL1 that researchers should understand?

UCHL1 is a 24.8 kDa acidic protein (pI 5.3) consisting of 223 amino acids, encoded by 9 exons with a transcript of 1172 bps in length. Human UCHL1 is located on chromosome 4 (4p14) and constitutes 1-2% of the total brain soluble fraction . While the query focuses on Monodelphis domestica (opossum) UCHL1, the basic structure is likely conserved across mammals.

UCHL1 performs three principal functions:

  • Deubiquitinating/hydrolase activity in the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway

  • Ubiquitin ligase activity for monoubiquitinated α-synuclein

  • Stabilization of monoubiquitin, providing ubiquitin for cellular events independent of enzymatic activity

Understanding these functions is critical for designing experimental controls when working with recombinant UCHL1 proteins.

What methodologies are recommended for purifying recombinant UCHL1 while maintaining its enzymatic activity?

Purification of recombinant UCHL1 requires careful consideration of protein stability and solubility. Based on research protocols:

  • Express the protein with a His-tag in E. coli BL21(DE3) using IPTG induction at lower temperatures (18-20°C) to enhance solubility

  • Lyse cells using sonication in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT

  • Purify using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography followed by size exclusion chromatography

  • Include reducing agents (1-2 mM DTT or TCEP) in all buffers to protect the active site cysteine

  • Consider enzyme solubility factors during purification—research has demonstrated that certain mutations like Ala216Asp can render the protein insoluble

When working specifically with M. domestica UCHL1, optimization of these conditions may be necessary based on sequence-specific properties.

How can researchers effectively measure UCHL1 enzymatic activity in vitro?

UCHL1 activity can be determined using fluorogenic substrates and monitoring hydrolysis rates. A recommended approach:

  • Utilize a fluorogenic Ub-Rho-morpholine substrate which releases the fluorophore upon deubiquitination

  • Standard assay conditions include:

    • 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5

    • 0.5 mM EDTA

    • 1 mM DTT

    • 0.1 mg/ml BSA

    • Substrate concentration of 0.5-1 μM

    • 10-50 nM purified UCHL1

  • Monitor fluorescence increase (λex/em = 485/530 nm) in real-time at 37°C

  • Calculate initial reaction rates from the linear portion of the progress curve

When comparing wild-type and mutant forms, researchers should note that specific mutations can dramatically alter activity—for example, the Arg178Gln mutation shows a 4-fold increase in hydrolytic activity compared to wild-type , while E7A mutations abolish hydrolase activity completely .

What are the critical structural domains in UCHL1 that influence its function, and how should mutations be analyzed?

Several crucial domains in UCHL1 affect its function:

  • Active site region (residues 84-100) containing the catalytic cysteine residue

  • Ubiquitin binding regions

  • Secretion site (residues 32-39)—identified as critical for protein stability and proper protein conformation

  • N-myristoylation sites (87-92, 94-99)

  • Protein kinase C (PKC) phosphorylation sites (76-78, 121-123, 205-207)

  • Casein kinase II phosphorylation sites (119-122, 125-128, 188-191, 205-208)

When analyzing mutations, researchers should employ:

  • Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER

  • Root mean square deviation (RMSD) analysis of structural changes

  • Chimera visualization software to assess structural impacts

  • Circular dichroism analysis to determine changes in secondary structure

Mutations throughout the protein can affect common regions. For instance, disease-causing mutations scattered across UCHL1 impact the structure of the protein region spanning amino acids 32-39, suggesting intragenic epistatic interactions .

How do disease-associated mutations in UCHL1 affect its biochemical properties?

Different mutations variably impact UCHL1 function, providing insights for comparative studies:

MutationBiochemical EffectPhenotypic Consequence
I93M- 50% reduction in hydrolase activity
- Decreased alpha-helix structure
- Increased insolubility
- Aberrant protein interactions
- Decreased monoubiquitin binding
Autosomal dominant Parkinson's disease
S18Y- Reduced ligase activity
- Decreased ubiquitinated α-synuclein
Potentially protective against Parkinson's disease (controversial)
E7A- Complete loss of ubiquitin binding
- Abolished hydrolase activity
Severe functional impairment
Arg178Gln- 4-fold increase in hydrolytic activityEarly-onset progressive neurodegeneration
Ala216Asp- Protein insolubilityEarly-onset progressive neurodegeneration

When examining mutations in M. domestica UCHL1, researchers should consider whether these conserved residues show similar effects across species .

What approaches are recommended for developing activity-based probes to monitor UCHL1 activity?

Activity-based probes (ABPs) are valuable tools for monitoring UCHL1 activity in various experimental contexts. Based on recent research:

  • Design considerations:

    • Cyanimide-containing inhibitors can function as irreversible binders

    • Installation of fluorescent groups (rhodamine or BodipyFL) affects inhibitory properties minimally

    • Cell-penetrating properties are crucial for in vivo applications

  • Recommended probe design approach:

    • Start with a selective UCHL1 inhibitor scaffold (e.g., 6RK73 with IC50 of 0.23 μM)

    • Confirm selectivity against related DUBs (UCHL3, UCHL5, USP7, USP30)

    • Evaluate reversibility through jump dilution experiments

    • Attach appropriate fluorophores based on experimental needs

  • Validation methods:

    • Perform competitive activity-based protein profiling

    • Confirm specificity by mass spectrometry

    • Test labeling in cell lysates and intact cells

    • Validate in animal models (e.g., zebrafish embryos)

The choice between one-step probes (directly visualizable) or two-step probes (requiring secondary labeling) depends on specific experimental requirements.

How does evolutionary conservation influence the functional analysis of UCHL1 across different species?

Evolutionary analysis provides critical context for interpreting UCHL1 function:

  • Phylogenetic analysis suggests UCHL1 originated in early gnathostome evolutionary history

  • The gene has undergone strong purifying selection, indicating functional importance

  • Key functional domains show differential conservation patterns:

    • Cysteine active site (residues 84-100) and N-myristoylation sites are highly conserved in sarcopterygians

    • PKC phosphorylation sites show conservation in mammals but variation in birds

    • N-myristoylation site translocation is observed in chicken and coelacanth

When working with M. domestica UCHL1, researchers should:

  • Compare sequence conservation in functional domains

  • Analyze the conservation of the critical 32-39 amino acid segment

  • Consider the evolutionary distance between marsupials and placental mammals

  • Evaluate whether mutations might have different effects based on species-specific structural constraints

What methodologies are most effective for studying UCHL1 interactions with α-synuclein and other proteins?

Understanding UCHL1's interactions with other proteins requires specialized techniques:

  • For studying α-synuclein interactions:

    • Employ cell-free ubiquitination assays to assess UCHL1's ligase activity

    • Use pulldown assays with recombinant proteins to confirm direct interactions

    • Quantify monoubiquitinated α-synuclein levels in the presence of wild-type vs. mutant UCHL1

    • Implement proximity ligation assays in neuronal models to visualize interactions in situ

  • For broader interaction studies:

    • Conduct immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry

    • Perform yeast two-hybrid screening to identify novel interactors

    • Use isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) to determine binding affinities

    • Apply FRET/BRET approaches to study interactions in living cells

  • Analytical considerations:

    • Control for UCHL1 solubility issues that may affect interaction studies

    • Consider the role of post-translational modifications in mediating interactions

    • Account for the effect of mutations on protein-protein interfaces

How can researchers effectively use mass spectrometry to study UCHL1 modification and activity?

Mass spectrometry offers powerful approaches for UCHL1 analysis:

  • For covalent complex formation analysis:

    • Utilize LC-MS with electrospray ionization (positive mode)

    • Run samples on a protein BEH C4 column with appropriate mobile phases

    • Process data using specialized software (e.g., Waters MassLynx)

    • Deconvolute ion peaks to identify molecular species

  • For quantifying UCHL1 levels in biological samples:

    • Implement targeted mass spectrometry approaches

    • Develop specific reaction monitoring (SRM) or parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) assays

    • Use stable isotope-labeled standards for accurate quantification

    • Apply in fibroblasts or other cellular models to compare wild-type and mutant expression levels

  • For identifying post-translational modifications:

    • Perform tryptic digestion followed by LC-MS/MS

    • Map modifications to specific residues

    • Quantify modification stoichiometry

    • Correlate modifications with enzymatic activity

What experimental approaches are recommended for evaluating the role of UCHL1 in neurodegenerative disease models?

To investigate UCHL1's role in neurodegeneration:

  • Cellular models:

    • Generate neuronal cell lines expressing wild-type or mutant UCHL1

    • Measure ubiquitin homeostasis using fluorescent reporters

    • Assess proteasome function and protein aggregation

    • Evaluate neuronal morphology and survival under stress conditions

  • Animal models:

    • Create transgenic models expressing mutant UCHL1 (consider I93M which exhibits PD-related phenotypes)

    • Monitor for neurodegeneration of dopaminergic neurons within 20 weeks

    • Assess motor function and behavior

    • Analyze protein aggregation in vivo

  • Patient-derived models:

    • Generate iPSCs from patients with UCHL1 mutations

    • Differentiate into dopaminergic neurons

    • Compare with isogenic corrected controls

    • Evaluate phenotypes and test potential therapeutic interventions

  • Probe-based monitoring:

    • Apply selective fluorescent probes to visualize active UCHL1 in disease models

    • Track spatiotemporal changes in UCHL1 activity during disease progression

    • Use in zebrafish or other transparent models for real-time monitoring

How can computational modeling be used to predict the functional impact of novel UCHL1 mutations?

Computational approaches offer valuable insights into UCHL1 mutation effects:

  • Homology modeling workflow:

    • Generate models using MODELLER based on crystal structures

    • Perform energy minimization to optimize structures

    • Calculate RMSD values to quantify structural changes

    • Identify critical residues and interaction networks

  • Molecular dynamics simulations:

    • Simulate protein dynamics in explicit solvent

    • Analyze conformational changes over time

    • Identify altered flexibility or stability regions

    • Evaluate effects on catalytic residues and binding interfaces

  • Structural analysis insights:

    • Focus on the critical 32-39 amino acid segment within the secretion site

    • Evaluate potential intragenic epistasis effects

    • Assess impact on protein stability and conformation

    • Analyze alterations in interaction sites

Structural analysis has revealed that seemingly unrelated mutations can affect common functional regions through intragenic epistatic interactions, highlighting the importance of comprehensive structural assessment rather than sequence analysis alone .

What are the optimal conditions for determining inhibitor efficacy against UCHL1?

When evaluating UCHL1 inhibitors:

  • Standard biochemical assay conditions:

    • Use fluorogenic Ub-Rho-morpholine substrate

    • Include 2 mM cysteine in the reaction buffer

    • Incubate for 30 minutes at optimal temperature

    • Measure IC50 values against wild-type and mutant UCHL1 variants

  • Selectivity assessment:

    • Test against closest DUB family members (UCHL3, UCHL5)

    • Include a broader panel of cysteine DUBs (USP7, USP30, USP16)

    • Include non-DUB cysteine proteases (e.g., papain) as controls

    • Calculate selectivity ratios (>50-fold difference is considered selective)

  • Binding mechanism evaluation:

    • Perform jump dilution experiments to assess reversibility

      • Treat 100× final assay concentration of UCHL1 with inhibitor

      • Dilute 100× into substrate-containing buffer

      • Monitor fluorescence recovery over time

    • Confirm covalent complex formation by mass spectrometry

  • Cell-based validation:

    • Assess cellular permeability and target engagement

    • Compare performance in different cell types

    • Evaluate dose-dependent target inhibition

    • Monitor potential off-target effects

How can researchers effectively design experiments to study intragenic epistasis in UCHL1?

Intragenic epistasis (interaction between mutations within the same gene) is critical for understanding UCHL1 function:

  • Experimental design approach:

    • Generate single and double mutants of UCHL1

    • Assess enzymatic activity of each variant independently

    • Compare observed activity of double mutants with predicted additive effects

    • Focus on interactions between residues in the critical 32-39 segment and other regions

  • Structural analysis methods:

    • Superimpose ancestral protein structures at appropriate evolutionary scope

    • Calculate RMSD values to quantify structural changes

    • Identify regions showing non-additive effects in double mutants

    • Use molecular dynamics to simulate conformational changes

  • Functional validation:

    • Assess protein stability using thermal shift assays

    • Measure changes in secondary structure with circular dichroism

    • Evaluate protein-protein interactions affected by epistatic mutations

    • Test cellular phenotypes of epistatic mutants

Research has shown that during mammalian evolution, UCHL1 has undergone strong intragenic epistatic interactions to acquire favorable protein conformation, and understanding these relationships is essential for interpreting disease-causing mutations .

What approaches should be used to investigate the tissue-specific expression and function of UCHL1?

Understanding tissue-specific UCHL1 activity requires specialized approaches:

  • Expression analysis methods:

    • Quantitative RT-PCR to measure transcript levels across tissues

    • Western blotting with specific antibodies to detect protein expression

    • Immunohistochemistry to visualize cellular and subcellular localization

    • Single-cell RNA sequencing to identify cell type-specific expression patterns

  • Functional analysis approaches:

    • Tissue-specific knockout or knockdown models

    • Cell type-specific expression of fluorescent UCHL1 probes

    • Comparison of UCHL1 activity across neural and non-neural tissues

    • Evaluation of ubiquitin dynamics in different cell types

  • Regulation assessment:

    • Promoter analysis to identify tissue-specific regulatory elements

    • Investigation of epigenetic modifications affecting expression

    • Analysis of transcription factors controlling UCHL1 expression

    • Evaluation of post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms

UCHL1 is normally expressed exclusively in neurons and testis but shows abnormal expression in many primary lung tumors, lung tumor cell lines, and colorectal cancers, suggesting context-dependent regulation that should be considered in experimental design .

How can UCHL1 activity-based probes be optimized for in vivo imaging applications?

Optimizing UCHL1 probes for in vivo applications requires special considerations:

  • Fluorophore selection criteria:

    • Rhodamine-tagged probes (e.g., 9RK87) show excellent in vitro characteristics but poor cell membrane permeability

    • BodipyFL-conjugated probes demonstrate better cell penetration but slightly reduced potency

    • Consider near-infrared fluorophores for deeper tissue penetration in animal models

    • Evaluate quantum yield and photostability for long-term imaging

  • Structural optimization strategies:

    • Improve cell-penetrating properties of rhodamine through chemical modifications

    • Consider adding cell-penetrating peptides for enhanced delivery

    • Optimize linker length and composition to maintain target selectivity

    • Balance probe size with tissue distribution properties

  • Validation approaches:

    • Confirm selective labeling in cell lysates before proceeding to intact cells

    • Test in multiple cell lines to ensure broad applicability

    • Validate in transparent animal models (e.g., zebrafish embryos)

    • Develop protocols for spatiotemporal monitoring of UCHL1 activity

Research has demonstrated successful use of UCHL1-selective probes for monitoring activity during zebrafish embryo development, suggesting applications for studying embryogenesis and diseases such as Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, and cancer .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.