Mouse Ankrd46 is a protein characterized by multiple ankyrin repeat domains. These ankyrin domains form a β-hairpin–α-helix–loop–α-helix (β2α2) secondary structure that functions in protein-protein interactions across various cellular processes . The protein contains multiple ankyrin repeats that are essential for its biological function. The mouse Ankrd46 is orthologous to human ANKRD46, with high sequence identity between species .
Ankrd46 contains multiple ankyrin repeat domains, which are approximately 33-amino acid motifs that create protein-binding interfaces. These domains are arranged in tandem arrays and contribute to the protein's three-dimensional structure, allowing it to participate in protein-protein interactions. Additionally, mouse Ankrd46a (a zebrafish ortholog) is predicted to be located in the membrane according to comparative studies . The protein functions in various cellular processes through its protein-protein interaction capabilities mediated by these ankyrin domains .
Ankrd46 shows significant conservation across mammalian species. Human ANKRD46 protein has orthologues in mouse and rat with approximately 98% sequence identity in these species . This high degree of evolutionary conservation suggests important biological functions. Zebrafish has an orthologous gene called ankrd46a, which is located on chromosome 21 . This conservation across vertebrate species indicates functional importance throughout evolutionary history.
While the search results don't provide comprehensive tissue expression data specifically for mouse Ankrd46, comparative studies suggest that it may have a pattern similar to human ANKRD46. Studies utilizing mouse models have shown that Ankrd46 may be expressed in various tissues, as evidenced by phenotypic changes in multiple systems when the gene is disrupted . Mouse models with Ankrd46 mutations have demonstrated abnormal vitreous body morphology and increased monocyte cell numbers, suggesting expression in ocular tissues and hematopoietic systems .
To study temporal expression of Ankrd46 during development:
RNA expression analysis:
Protein expression analysis:
Single-cell analysis approach:
Based on established protocols for similar ankyrin repeat proteins, the most effective expression systems for recombinant mouse Ankrd46 production include:
Bacterial expression systems (E. coli):
Advantages: High yield, cost-effective, rapid expression
Considerations: May require optimization of codon usage for mammalian proteins
Best for: Protein fragments, domains, or full-length protein without post-translational modifications
Expression tags: His-tags are commonly used for purification purposes
Insect cell expression (Baculovirus):
Advantages: Better folding of complex proteins, some post-translational modifications
Considerations: More time-consuming than bacterial systems
Best for: Full-length protein requiring proper folding
Mammalian cell expression (CHO, HEK293):
The choice depends on experimental requirements for protein function, purity, and yield.
For high-purity recombinant Ankrd46, a multi-step purification strategy is recommended:
Affinity chromatography:
For His-tagged constructs: Ni-NTA or IMAC purification
Optimize imidazole concentration in washing steps to reduce non-specific binding
Consider on-column refolding if protein is expressed in inclusion bodies
Ion exchange chromatography:
As a secondary purification step based on the protein's isoelectric point
Helps remove contaminants with similar affinity but different charge properties
Size exclusion chromatography:
Final polishing step to separate monomeric protein from aggregates
Also useful for buffer exchange into storage buffer
Quality control:
Based on protocols for similar proteins, optimal storage conditions for recombinant Ankrd46 include:
Short-term storage (1-2 weeks):
Store at 4°C in appropriate buffer with protease inhibitors
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Long-term storage:
Lyophilization (for extended stability):
Stability monitoring:
Perform periodic activity assays to confirm protein functionality
Check for degradation using SDS-PAGE before critical experiments
Several robust methods can be employed to characterize Ankrd46 protein-protein interactions:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Proximity-based labeling techniques:
BioID or TurboID fusion constructs to identify proximal proteins
APEX2 labeling for temporal control of labeling reactions
Analyze results with mass spectrometry
Yeast two-hybrid screening:
Use Ankrd46 (or specific domains) as bait
Screen against mouse cDNA libraries
Validate interactions with orthogonal methods
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) or bio-layer interferometry (BLI):
Quantitative measurement of binding kinetics and affinity
Requires purified recombinant proteins
Can determine association/dissociation rates
Fluorescence techniques:
Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)
Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS)
Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC)
These approaches provide complementary information about the specificity, strength, and context of interactions.
To study Ankrd46's role in cellular processes, consider these experimental approaches:
Loss-of-function studies:
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene knockout
siRNA or shRNA knockdown for transient depletion
Use multiple guide RNAs or siRNAs to control for off-target effects
Include rescue experiments with wild-type Ankrd46 to confirm specificity
Gain-of-function studies:
Overexpression of wild-type Ankrd46
Creation of domain-specific mutants to identify functional regions
Use inducible expression systems for temporal control
Localization studies:
Generate fluorescent protein fusions
Perform live cell imaging to track dynamics
Co-localization with organelle markers
Phenotypic assays:
Single-cell analysis:
Transcriptomic profiling after Ankrd46 manipulation
Pathway analysis to identify affected cellular processes
Importantly, experimental design should follow established guidelines such as proper controls, statistical power analysis, and randomization to ensure reliable results .
To assess whether recombinant Ankrd46 retains its native functional activity:
Protein-binding assays:
Pull-down assays with known or predicted interaction partners
SPR or BLI to measure binding kinetics
Compare binding properties with native protein when possible
Structural integrity assessment:
Cellular activity assays:
Post-translational modification analysis:
Phosphorylation state assessment (if known to be regulated by phosphorylation)
Western blotting with modification-specific antibodies
Comparison with non-recombinant controls:
Side-by-side assays with native protein when available
Use of multiple recombinant protein batches to ensure consistency
Current evidence linking Ankrd46 to human diseases includes:
Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD):
A whole exome sequencing study identified ANKRD46 as having protein-truncating variants associated with loss of function that differed in frequency between AUD probands and controls
The study found that ANKRD46 had an odds ratio (OR) of 176.1 (p = 2.01 × 10⁻⁴) in AUD patients
This suggests ANKRD46 may play a role in neurological pathways related to addiction
Atrioventricular conduction:
Other potential associations:
Mouse models provide valuable insights into Ankrd46 function in disease contexts through:
Existing knockout phenotypes:
Disease model development:
Conditional knockout models can target Ankrd46 deletion to specific tissues
Inducible systems allow temporal control to distinguish developmental vs. adult functions
Humanized mouse models could incorporate human ANKRD46 variants identified in diseases
Experimental approaches:
Behavioral testing for AUD-related phenotypes (based on human association)
Cardiac conduction studies (ECG, optical mapping)
Immune cell profiling (flow cytometry, single-cell analysis)
Cross with disease model mice to assess genetic interactions
Translational applications:
Drug screening on Ankrd46-deficient cells or mice
Biomarker development based on altered pathways
Target validation for therapeutic development
When designing these studies, researchers should consider:
Use of both sexes to account for potential sex differences
Multiple genetic backgrounds to control for strain-specific effects
Appropriate age ranges based on disease onset
To evaluate Ankrd46 as a potential therapeutic target, researchers should consider these methodological approaches:
Target validation:
CRISPR/Cas9 knockout in disease-relevant cell lines
Conditional knockout in adult mice to avoid developmental effects
RNA interference for acute, tissue-specific knockdown
Correlation of expression levels with disease progression in patient samples
Functional screening:
High-throughput screening for small molecules that modulate Ankrd46 interactions
Fragment-based drug discovery targeting specific protein domains
Peptide-based inhibitors of key protein-protein interactions
Structure-based drug design (if crystal structure becomes available)
Mechanism of action studies:
Identification of critical binding partners in disease contexts
Mapping of interaction interfaces using mutagenesis
Characterization of downstream signaling pathways
Phosphoproteomics to identify altered signaling networks
Therapeutic delivery approaches:
For protein replacement: recombinant protein delivery systems
For gene therapy: viral vector optimization for tissue-specific expression
For inhibition: antisense oligonucleotides or siRNA delivery strategies
Evaluation of tissue penetration and pharmacokinetics
Safety assessment:
Off-target effect analysis using transcriptomics and proteomics
Toxicity studies in diverse cell types
Evaluation of compensatory mechanisms upon target inhibition
These approaches should be implemented with careful experimental design, including appropriate controls and statistical power calculations to ensure reliable and reproducible results.
While specific information about post-translational modifications (PTMs) of Ankrd46 is limited in the provided search results, researchers can investigate this important aspect through:
Identification of PTMs:
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics to map PTM sites
Comparison of PTMs between recombinant and endogenous protein
Analysis of PTM dynamics under different cellular conditions
Examination of conservation of potential modification sites across species
Functional impact assessment:
Site-directed mutagenesis of predicted PTM sites (phosphorylation, ubiquitination, etc.)
Generation of phosphomimetic or non-phosphorylatable mutants
Comparison of binding properties before and after inducing specific modifications
Analysis of protein stability and half-life with modified or unmodified protein
Regulatory enzymes:
Identification of kinases, phosphatases, or other enzymes that modify Ankrd46
Co-expression studies to assess enzyme-substrate relationships
Inhibitor studies to determine functional consequences of specific modifications
Structural consequences:
Molecular dynamics simulations to predict conformational changes
Biophysical methods (CD, fluorescence) to detect structural alterations
NMR studies of domain flexibility before and after modification
This research direction may be particularly important given that many ankyrin repeat proteins are regulated by PTMs that affect their binding properties and cellular functions.
The relationship between Ankrd46 and immune cell function represents an intriguing research area, particularly given the phenotype of increased monocyte numbers observed in knockout mice :
Expression profiling:
Single-cell RNA sequencing of immune cell populations
Flow cytometry analysis of Ankrd46 protein levels across immune cell subtypes
Examination of expression changes during immune cell differentiation and activation
Functional studies in immune cells:
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout in primary immune cells or cell lines
Assessment of proliferation, differentiation, and cytokine production
Chemotaxis and migration assays to evaluate cellular motility
Phagocytosis and other functional assays for myeloid cells
Signaling pathway analysis:
Phosphoproteomic analysis of signaling changes in Ankrd46-deficient immune cells
Investigation of receptor-mediated signaling (e.g., cytokine receptors, TLRs)
Analysis of transcription factor activation downstream of Ankrd46
In vivo immune challenges:
Response to infectious agents in Ankrd46-deficient mice
Autoimmune disease models to assess regulatory functions
Bone marrow transplantation to distinguish intrinsic vs. extrinsic effects
Clinical correlations:
Analysis of ANKRD46 expression in patient immune cells in various disease states
Correlation with inflammatory markers or disease severity
Genetic association studies in immune-related disorders
These studies would help clarify whether Ankrd46 has direct functions in immune cells or whether the observed monocyte phenotype is secondary to other physiological changes.
Alternative splicing is a key regulatory mechanism for Ankrd46, as indicated by the existence of multiple transcript variants . To investigate this process:
Comprehensive transcript mapping:
RNA-seq analysis across tissues and developmental stages
Targeted amplification of alternative exons
3' and 5' RACE to identify all transcript isoforms
Quantification of isoform abundance in different contexts
Isoform-specific functions:
Generation of isoform-specific expression constructs
Rescue experiments with different isoforms in knockout models
Domain-specific analysis of protein-protein interactions
Subcellular localization studies for each isoform
Splicing regulation:
Identification of splicing enhancers and silencers within the gene
Investigation of tissue-specific splicing factors that interact with these elements
Minigene assays to test specific regulatory sequences
CLIP-seq to identify RNA-binding proteins that regulate Ankrd46 splicing
Evolutionary conservation:
Comparative analysis of splicing patterns across species
Identification of conserved vs. species-specific isoforms
Analysis of selection pressure on alternatively spliced exons
Disease relevance:
Analysis of splicing changes in disease states
Investigation of splicing-disrupting mutations in patient samples
Therapeutic approaches targeting specific splice variants
This research area is particularly important as alternative splicing can dramatically alter protein function, creating isoforms with distinct or even opposing activities from the same gene.
Detecting endogenous Ankrd46 can present several challenges:
Antibody specificity issues:
Low expression levels:
Challenge: Weak signal in certain tissues or cell types
Solution: Use signal amplification methods or enrichment strategies
Method: Consider proximity ligation assays, tyramide signal amplification, or immunoprecipitation before detection
Isoform complexity:
Challenge: Multiple splice variants complicating interpretation
Solution: Design isoform-specific detection reagents
Method: Use primers spanning unique exon junctions for RT-qPCR, or antibodies targeting isoform-specific regions
Protein extraction difficulties:
Challenge: Membrane association may require specialized extraction methods
Solution: Optimize lysis buffers with appropriate detergents
Method: Compare different extraction protocols (RIPA, NP-40, Triton X-100, etc.) for efficiency
Post-translational modifications:
Challenge: Modifications may mask epitopes or alter migration
Solution: Use multiple detection methods and consider modification-specific antibodies
Method: Treat samples with phosphatases or other enzymes to remove modifications when needed
Following MIQE guidelines for qPCR and similar best practices for protein detection can help ensure reliable results.
For reliable analysis of Ankrd46 gene expression:
RT-qPCR optimization:
Follow MIQE guidelines for experimental design and reporting
Validate primer efficiency using standard curves (90-110% efficiency ideal)
Design primers spanning exon-exon junctions to avoid genomic DNA amplification
Use multiple primer sets targeting different regions of the transcript
Include no-RT controls to detect genomic DNA contamination
Reference gene selection:
Critical point: Common reference genes like GAPDH and ACTB have been shown to vary considerably under different experimental conditions
Test multiple reference genes for stability in your specific experimental system
Use reference gene validation tools (GeNorm, NormFinder)
Consider using geometric mean of multiple validated reference genes
Sample preparation:
Experimental design considerations:
Data analysis:
Apply appropriate normalization methods
Use statistics appropriate for the experimental design
Report both biological and technical variability
Consider advanced analyses for complex designs (e.g., mixed effects models)
Essential quality control measures for recombinant Ankrd46 include:
Purity assessment:
Identity confirmation:
Functional validation:
Binding assays with known interaction partners
Structural characterization (CD spectroscopy, thermal stability)
Comparison with positive control batches when available
Activity assays appropriate to the protein's function
Contaminant testing:
Stability monitoring:
Accelerated stability studies under various conditions
Real-time stability monitoring during storage
Freeze-thaw stability assessment
Assessment of activity retention over time
Batch-to-batch consistency:
Standardized production methods
Reference standards for comparison
Consistent quality control metrics across batches
Documentation of production parameters
These measures ensure that experimental results are reliable and reproducible when working with recombinant Ankrd46 protein.