Collectin-10 (CL-10), also known as collectin liver 1 (CL-L1) or Collectin-34 (CL-34), is a protein encoded by the COLEC10 gene. It belongs to the family of collagenous Ca²⁺-dependent (C-type) lectins which contains triple-helical collagen-like domains and C-terminal Ca²⁺-dependent lectin domains. This protein shares structural and functional characteristics with other collectins including mannose-binding lectin (MBL), surfactant proteins A and D (SP-A and SP-D), collectin placenta 1 (CL-12), conglutinin, collectins of 43kDA and 46 kDa, and collectin-11. These proteins maintain high evolutionary conservation, indicating their biological importance across species .
Methodologically, researchers studying Collectin-10 structure should employ techniques such as X-ray crystallography, cryo-electron microscopy, or nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to elucidate its three-dimensional structure. Proper protein folding analysis is essential when working with recombinant forms to ensure native conformation is maintained.
While traditionally considered to be primarily expressed in the liver and placenta , recent research has revealed that Collectin-10 is predominantly produced by hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) rather than hepatocytes as previously believed. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis of fibrotic mouse livers has demonstrated that Colec10 is mainly expressed by HSCs and is downregulated in fully activated HSCs .
For researchers investigating Colec10 expression, it is methodologically important to use cell type-specific markers when conducting immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization experiments, particularly when examining liver tissue. Single-cell transcriptomic approaches provide more accurate cellular source identification than traditional bulk tissue analysis.
Collectin-10 and Collectin-11 (CL-11) demonstrate a strong functional relationship in biological systems. Research has shown that CL-11 and CL-10 form hetero-oligomers that circulate in the serum and bind to mannose-binding lectin (MBL)-associated serine proteases (MASPs). These complexes are involved in complement activation in a MASP-2-dependent fashion .
Quantitative analysis has revealed a strong correlation between CL-L1 (CL-10) and CL-K1 (CL-11) serum levels (ρ = 0.7405, P <0.0001), suggesting that a major proportion of these proteins exist as heterooligomers or are subject to the same regulatory mechanisms . This correlation must be considered when designing experiments targeting either protein in isolation.
According to research conducted on Danish Caucasians, the median concentration of CL-L1 (Collectin-10) in serum is 1.87 μg/ml, with a range of 1.00–4.14 μg/ml. For comparison, the median concentration of CL-K1 (Collectin-11) is 0.32 μg/ml, with a range of 0.11–0.69 μg/ml .
Methodologically, researchers should use standardized ELISA or other quantitative immunoassay techniques when measuring Collectin-10 levels, and should be aware that values may vary based on the detection antibodies used. Reference ranges should be established for specific research populations, as genetic variations may influence baseline concentrations.
Collectin-10 functions as a soluble pattern recognition molecule in the lectin pathway of complement activation. It recognizes and binds to carbohydrate antigens on microorganisms such as mannose, fucose, and galactose with high affinity . This binding facilitates the complement activation against foreign pathogens.
The hetero-oligomers formed by CL-10 and CL-11 bind to MASPs (MBL-associated serine proteases) and activate the complement system in a MASP-2-dependent manner . This activation represents a critical component of the innate immune system's first line of defense.
For researchers investigating this process, it is important to design experiments that can distinguish between the contributions of Collectin-10 alone versus the CL-10/CL-11 heterocomplexes. Knockout models targeting each gene separately and in combination would provide valuable insights into their respective roles.
Studies examining the COLEC10 gene have found it to be highly conserved, with the majority of variations occurring in non-coding regions. Several non-synonymous variations have been identified, including:
| Variation | SNP ID | Minor Allele Frequency (MAF) | Effect on Protein Levels |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glu78Asp | rs150828850 | 0.003 | Not significant |
| Arg125Trp | rs149331285 | 0.007 | Increased CL-L1 levels (P = 0.0478) |
| His219Arg (in COLEC11) | rs7567833 | 0.033 | Not specified for CL-L1 |
Additionally, promoter polymorphism COLEC11-9570C>T (rs3820897) has been associated with decreased levels of CL-K1 (P = 0.044) .
Researchers studying COLEC10 variations should employ targeted sequencing of promoter regions, exons, and exon-intron boundaries to identify potential functional variants. Functional studies using site-directed mutagenesis and expression systems are necessary to determine the impact of specific variations on protein structure and function.
Recent research has identified a previously unknown role for Collectin-10 in liver fibrosis. Analysis of scRNA sequencing data from fibrotic mice livers revealed that Colec10 is predominantly produced by hepatic stellate cells and is involved in the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis .
Pseudotime trajectory inference processing on the data validated that Colec10 expression changes during HSC activation. The protein has been shown to have multiple functions in the fibrotic process, including:
Extracellular matrix production and alteration
Immune response regulation
Notably, Colec10 is hardly expressed in fully activated HSCs or hepatocytes, suggesting a role in the early stages of fibrosis development. Researchers investigating liver fibrosis should consider temporal expression dynamics of Colec10 during disease progression.
When faced with contradictory data in Collectin-10 research, several methodological approaches can be employed:
Researchers should consider cell-specific, temporal, and environmental factors that may explain apparent contradictions in Collectin-10 data.
Based on established recombinant protein production approaches, researchers working with recombinant mouse Collectin-10 should consider the following methodological considerations:
Expression system selection: Mammalian expression systems (CHO or HEK293 cells) are often preferred for collectins to ensure proper post-translational modifications, particularly glycosylation patterns that may affect function.
Codon optimization: Mouse-specific codon optimization can significantly improve expression yields in heterologous systems.
Purification strategy: A multi-step purification protocol typically involving affinity chromatography (using mannose-sepharose columns that exploit the carbohydrate-binding properties) followed by size-exclusion chromatography is recommended to obtain pure, functional protein.
Functional validation: Carbohydrate binding assays, complement activation assays, and oligomerization analysis should be performed to ensure the recombinant protein exhibits native-like properties.
Storage conditions: Collectin-10 stability is optimal when stored at -80°C in buffer containing calcium ions to maintain the integrity of the carbohydrate recognition domain.
Researchers should validate their recombinant protein through comparative analysis with native Collectin-10 isolated from mouse serum or tissue.
The strong correlation between Collectin-10 and Collectin-11 in serum (ρ = 0.7405, P <0.0001) suggests significant heterooligomerization in vivo . Advanced research into this phenomenon should employ methodologies such as:
Proximity ligation assays in tissue sections to visualize and quantify protein-protein interactions in their native context
FRET (Förster resonance energy transfer) or BRET (bioluminescence resonance energy transfer) approaches using tagged proteins
Co-immunoprecipitation from tissue lysates followed by mass spectrometry
Creation of conditional knockout mouse models that allow temporal control of gene deletion to study the dynamics of heterooligomer formation
These approaches would help elucidate the biological significance of the heterooligomerization and its functional consequences in various physiological and pathological contexts.
Given the newly discovered role of Collectin-10 in liver fibrosis and its predominant expression in hepatic stellate cells , an important area for investigation is the differential functions of this protein in acute versus chronic liver injury. Researchers addressing this question should design experiments incorporating:
Time-course studies using mouse models of both acute (e.g., acetaminophen toxicity) and chronic (e.g., carbon tetrachloride administration, high-fat diet) liver injury
Cell-specific conditional knockout models to isolate the contribution of stellate cell-derived Collectin-10
Transcriptomic and proteomic profiling at multiple time points to identify Collectin-10-dependent signaling pathways
Immunophenotyping of hepatic immune cell populations to determine immunomodulatory effects
Understanding these temporal dynamics could provide important insights for therapeutic targeting of Collectin-10 in liver diseases.