Interferon-induced transmembrane protein 2 (IFITM2) is an antiviral protein that inhibits viral entry into the host cell cytoplasm. While permitting endocytosis, IFITM2 prevents subsequent viral fusion and the release of viral contents into the cytosol. It exhibits activity against numerous viruses, including influenza A virus, SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV), Marburg virus (MARV), Ebola virus (EBOV), Dengue virus (DNV), and West Nile virus (WNV). IFITM2 inhibits viral entry mediated by: influenza virus hemagglutinin, MARV and EBOV GP1,2, and SARS-CoV spike protein. Furthermore, IFITM2 induces cell cycle arrest and mediates apoptosis via caspase activation, independent of p53.
Recombinant Mouse IFITM2 (also known as Dispanin subfamily A member 2c or Interferon-inducible protein 1-8D) is a membrane-associated protein with a molecular mass of approximately 19.4 kDa (predicted) or 19 kDa (measured) . It belongs to the interferon-induced transmembrane protein family, which are interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) involved in antiviral defense.
The primary functions of IFITM2 include:
Mediating broad-spectrum antiviral responses against multiple viruses
Enhancing type I interferon signaling pathways
Interacting with pattern recognition receptors like MDA5 to promote IFN-β production
Regulating endocytic processes in specific cell types, particularly in neural development
Recent studies have revealed that IFITM2 creates a positive feed-forward loop with type I IFN, establishing a critical role in enforcing innate immune responses . Furthermore, IFITM2 has been shown to modulate endocytosis in radial glial cells during brain development, indicating its importance extends beyond purely antiviral functions .
While IFITM proteins share structural similarities, they exhibit functional distinctions:
| Feature | IFITM1 | IFITM2 | IFITM3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cellular Localization | Primarily cell surface | Endosomal compartments | Late endosomes/lysosomes |
| Antiviral Activity Against RVFV | Limited | Strong | Strong |
| Effect on SARS-CoV-2 | Minimal effect | Inhibitory | Inhibitory |
| IFN-β Activation Potential | Moderate | Strong | Moderate |
IFITM2 shows the strongest antiviral effect and ability to activate IFN-β among the three IFITM proteins, making it a particularly important subject for antiviral research . Unlike IFITM1, both IFITM2 and IFITM3 can restrict Rift Valley Fever Virus replication . The proteins also show differential activities in SARS-CoV-2 infection, where IFITM2 and IFITM3, but not IFITM1, demonstrated inhibitory effects against SARS-CoV-2 Spike-pseudotyped vesicular stomatitis virus .
Recombinant Mouse IFITM2 protein typically consists of 144 amino acid residues (Met1~Phe144) . Key structural characteristics include:
Predicted molecular mass: 19.4 kDa
Actual measured molecular mass: 19 kDa
Isoelectric point: 6.8
Membrane protein with hydrophobic domains
Contains functional motifs important for endocytosis, including a YXXø motif that influences subcellular localization
The recombinant version used in research is often expressed with an N-terminal His Tag to facilitate purification and experimental applications . The protein is typically formulated in PBS (pH 7.4) containing 0.01% SKL and 5% Trehalose for stability .
Proper handling of Recombinant Mouse IFITM2 is crucial for maintaining its biological activity:
Reconstitution Protocol:
Reconstitute in 10mM PBS (pH 7.4) to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Avoid vortexing, which can damage the protein structure
Ensure complete solubilization before proceeding with experiments
Storage Recommendations:
For short-term storage (up to one month): 2-8°C
For long-term storage (up to 12 months): Aliquot and store at -80°C
Avoid repeated freeze/thaw cycles as this reduces activity
Stability Considerations:
The protein's purity (>90%) makes it suitable for use as a positive control, immunogen, or in analytical techniques like SDS-PAGE and Western blotting .
Based on current research, several experimental models have proven effective for studying IFITM2:
Cell Culture Systems:
Genetic Manipulation Approaches:
Virus Infection Models:
Several validated methods can be used to detect and localize IFITM2:
Protein Detection:
Western blotting: Using specific anti-IFITM2 antibodies
ELISA: For quantitative measurement in complex samples
Immunoprecipitation: Especially useful for studying protein interactions
Localization Studies:
Immunofluorescence microscopy: For visualization of subcellular localization
Subcellular fractionation: To separate membrane compartments
Live-cell imaging with fluorescently tagged IFITM2: For dynamic studies
Expression Analysis:
RT-qPCR: For mRNA expression levels
Flow cytometry: For cell surface expression analysis
Single-cell RNA sequencing: For expression patterns in heterogeneous populations
Researchers should note that IFITM2 is primarily localized to endosomal compartments, which should inform experimental design when studying its localization and interactions .
IFITM2 has been demonstrated to enhance type I interferon signaling through multiple mechanisms:
Interaction with Pattern Recognition Receptors:
Feed-Forward Amplification:
Pathway-Specific Effects:
The N-terminal domain of IFITM2 plays a particularly important role in its ability to activate the IFN-β signaling pathway, highlighting structure-function relationships that could be exploited for therapeutic development .
Recent research has revealed a previously unrecognized role for IFITM2 in neural development that appears distinct from its antiviral functions:
Endocytic Regulation in Neural Stem Cells:
Molecular Mechanisms:
The YXXø endocytic motif on IFITM2 is essential for its subcellular localization
Mutations in this motif reduce endocytic vesicle formation
K82 and K87 residues interact with phosphoinositides to promote endocytic vesicle formation
Polarized localization of phosphatidylinositol 3,4-bisphosphate (PI(3,4)P2) on the ventricular side suggests its involvement in vesicle formation
Signaling Pathway Interactions:
This dual role highlights IFITM2 as a multifunctional protein that links innate immunity and developmental processes, suggesting evolutionary conservation of cellular machinery across different biological contexts.
The scientific literature contains several contradictory findings regarding IFITM2's role in viral infections, particularly for SARS-CoV-2. Researchers can address these contradictions through:
Methodological Considerations:
Different experimental systems: Studies use various cell types, viral strains, and expression levels
Pseudovirus vs. authentic virus: Results may differ between these systems
Timing of measurements: Early vs. late infection stages may show different effects
Specific Case of SARS-CoV-2:
Reconciliation Approaches:
Side-by-side comparison of different systems under identical conditions
Detailed analysis of protein localization in different cell types
Consideration of concentration-dependent effects
Assessment of interactions with other host factors that may modify IFITM2 activity
Proposed Resolution Framework:
| Aspect | Approach to Reconciliation |
|---|---|
| Cell Type Differences | Test multiple relevant cell lines in parallel |
| Viral System | Compare pseudovirus and authentic virus in the same study |
| Expression Levels | Use inducible systems to test dose-dependent effects |
| Temporal Dynamics | Perform time-course experiments |
| Cofactor Requirements | Analyze proteomic interactions in different contexts |
These contradictions highlight the complexity of virus-host interactions and the context-dependent nature of restriction factors like IFITM2 .
IFITM2 contains several functional domains that contribute to its various biological activities:
N-Terminal Domain:
Endocytic Motif (YXXø):
Lysine Residues (K82 and K87):
Transmembrane Domains:
Contribute to membrane association and protein stability
May influence the protein's ability to restrict viral entry
Affect interaction with other membrane components
Post-Translational Modification Sites:
Potential sites for ubiquitination, palmitoylation, and phosphorylation
Regulate protein turnover and functional activity
May be differentially modified in response to various stimuli
Understanding these domains provides insights into how IFITM2 performs its diverse functions and offers potential targets for therapeutic interventions or experimental manipulations.
Researchers often encounter several challenges when working with Recombinant IFITM2:
Protein Stability Issues:
Solubility Problems:
Challenge: As a membrane protein, IFITM2 may aggregate or precipitate
Solution: Reconstitute in appropriate buffers (10mM PBS, pH 7.4); avoid vortexing; consider adding mild detergents for certain applications
Detection Difficulties:
Challenge: Low expression levels or antibody cross-reactivity with other IFITM proteins
Solution: Use tagged versions for easier detection; validate antibodies for specificity; employ multiple detection methods in parallel
Functional Assay Variability:
Challenge: Inconsistent results in antiviral or signaling assays
Solution: Standardize cell culture conditions; control for endogenous IFITM expression; include appropriate positive and negative controls
Expression System Limitations:
Challenge: Difficulty expressing functional protein in certain systems
Solution: Optimize codon usage for the expression system; consider eukaryotic expression for proper post-translational modifications; test multiple tags and fusion partners
Effective manipulation of IFITM2 expression is critical for functional studies:
siRNA Knockdown Optimization:
Use validated siRNA sequences (e.g., human IFITM-2 catalog no. L-020103-00; ON-TARGET plus)
Include nontargeting siRNA controls (e.g., catalog no. D-001810-04; ON-TARGET plus)
Assess knockdown efficiency by RT-qPCR and Western blot
Optimize transfection conditions for each cell type
Consider the timing of knockdown relative to experimental readouts
Overexpression Strategies:
Select appropriate vectors based on experimental requirements
Consider inducible expression systems for temporal control
Validate expression levels and subcellular localization
Be aware that very high expression levels may cause artifacts
Include empty vector controls and consider dose-response relationships
CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing:
Design specific guide RNAs to minimize off-target effects
Validate edited clones by sequencing and functional assays
Consider potential compensatory mechanisms from other IFITM family members
Generate rescue cell lines to confirm specificity of observed phenotypes
Assessment Framework:
| Parameter | Method | Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Expression Level | RT-qPCR, Western blot | Analyze both mRNA and protein levels |
| Subcellular Localization | Immunofluorescence, fractionation | Confirm proper targeting |
| Functional Impact | Viral infection, signaling assays | Include appropriate controls |
| Off-Target Effects | RNA-seq, proteomics | Monitor for unexpected changes |
| Compensation | Family member expression analysis | Check for upregulation of related proteins |
To effectively study IFITM2's protein-protein interactions:
Co-Immunoprecipitation Approaches:
Proximity Labeling Methods:
BioID or TurboID fusion proteins can identify proximal interactors
APEX2-based approaches work well for membrane proteins like IFITM2
These methods can capture transient or weak interactions missed by co-IP
Fluorescence-Based Interaction Assays:
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) for direct interaction studies
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) to visualize interactions in living cells
Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy for quantitative interaction measurements
Structural Biology Approaches:
Cryo-EM for larger complexes
NMR for structural determination of protein domains
X-ray crystallography for high-resolution interaction details
Domain Mapping Studies:
Generate deletion mutants to identify interaction domains
Use peptide arrays to pinpoint specific binding motifs
Alanine scanning mutagenesis to identify critical residues
The interaction between IFITM2 and MDA5 has been successfully demonstrated using co-IP approaches, providing a validated method for studying this particular interaction .
Several emerging areas of IFITM2 research show significant potential:
Therapeutic Applications:
Development of IFITM2-inspired antiviral peptides or mimetics
Targeted enhancement of IFITM2 activity to boost innate immunity
Potential applications in viral diseases where IFITM2 shows strong restriction activity
Neurological Development:
Broad-Spectrum Antiviral Strategies:
Leveraging IFITM2's ability to restrict multiple viruses for pandemic preparedness
Identifying common mechanisms that could be therapeutically targeted
Understanding resistance mechanisms that viruses develop against IFITM2
Pathway Integration Analysis:
Systems biology approaches to map IFITM2's position in cellular networks
Study of crosstalk between antiviral and developmental pathways
Identification of novel regulatory mechanisms controlling IFITM2 expression and function
Comparative analysis of IFITM2 across species offers valuable insights:
Evolutionary Conservation and Divergence:
Compare human, mouse, and other mammalian IFITM2 homologs
Identify conserved domains that likely serve critical functions
Analyze species-specific variations that might reflect adaptation to different viral threats
Host-Pathogen Co-evolution:
Study IFITM2 variations in species with different susceptibilities to viral infections
Identify potential signatures of positive selection in IFITM genes
Correlate IFITM2 sequence variations with species-specific viral resistance patterns
Functional Conservation Across Systems:
Compare IFITM2's role in neural development across vertebrates
Examine whether dual functionality (antiviral and developmental) is conserved
Identify species-specific regulatory mechanisms controlling IFITM2 expression
Translational Relevance:
Determine how findings in mouse models translate to human IFITM2 function
Develop improved animal models that better recapitulate human IFITM2 biology
Leverage comparative insights for therapeutic development
Existing research already demonstrates the value of this approach, with studies examining both mouse and human models showing conservation of IFITM2's role in neurogenesis .