Angel1 belongs to the CCR4 deadenylase family and exhibits the following activities:
eIF4E Interaction: Binds eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) via a conserved YxxxxLΦ motif, competing with eIF4G for eIF4E binding without affecting global translation rates .
Subcellular Localization: Localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus in perinuclear regions .
Role in Spermatogenesis: Regulates stage-specific mRNA translation during germ cell development .
Angel1 binds eIF4E through its C-terminal motif, forming a complex distinct from eIF4G or 4E-BP1 .
Mutating Tyr506 in the motif abolishes eIF4E binding, confirming the motif's necessity .
Unlike 4E-BP1, Angel1-eIF4E interaction is unaffected by mTOR inhibition (e.g., PP242 treatment) .
Co-localizes with eIF4E in cytoplasmic perinuclear particles, suggesting a role in localized mRNA regulation .
In humans, Angel1 localizes to mitochondrial outer membranes, while its paralog Angel2 resides in the mitochondrial matrix .
Angel1 contains an endo-exonuclease-phosphatase (EEP) domain, though its phosphatase activity is less characterized compared to Angel2, which processes RNA 3′ phosphates .
Recombinant Mouse Angel1 is utilized in:
Protein Interaction Studies: Cap-column assays and immunoprecipitation to map eIF4E-binding partners .
Functional Knockdown: shRNA-mediated silencing to assess impacts on translation and cellular processes .
Antibody Validation: Serves as a control fragment for antibody specificity in Western blotting (WB) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) .
Mechanistic Role: How Angel1 selectively regulates mRNAs during spermatogenesis remains unclear .
Enzymatic Targets: The specific RNA or protein substrates of Angel1’s EEP domain require further characterization .
This synthesis integrates data from structural analyses, interaction studies, and commercial protein engineering to define Recombinant Mouse Angel1 as a critical tool for exploring mRNA translation regulation and cellular compartmentalization.
What are the optimal expression systems for producing functional recombinant Mouse Angel1?
Several expression systems have been successfully used to produce recombinant Mouse Angel1, each with advantages depending on research requirements:
For functional studies requiring proper protein folding and post-translational modifications, mammalian expression systems like HEK-293 are recommended. When optimizing recombinant Angel1 expression, researchers should consider:
Codon optimization for the expression host
Selection of appropriate purification tags that don't interfere with protein function
Addition of protease inhibitors during purification
Validation of protein activity post-purification
Storage conditions to maintain protein stability
Validation of recombinant protein quality should include SDS-PAGE, Western blotting, and activity assays appropriate to Angel1's putative functions .
How can Angel1's phosphatase activity be characterized and what are its substrates?
Characterizing Angel1's phosphatase activity requires systematic biochemical approaches:
Enzyme kinetics analysis:
Substrate identification:
Test various RNA substrates with different end modifications
Perform RNA immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (RIP-seq) to identify bound RNA targets
Use phosphatase-dead mutants as negative controls
Structural analysis:
In cellulo validation:
Express wild-type and phosphatase-dead mutants in cells
Analyze global changes in RNA phosphorylation status
Perform rescue experiments in Angel1-depleted cells
This methodological approach will help determine whether Angel1's phosphatase activity is similar to Angel2's ability to hydrolyze terminal 2′,3′-cyclic phosphates on RNA molecules.
What is the relationship between Angel1 and eIF4E, and how does this interaction affect translation regulation?
Angel1 has been identified as a novel eIF4E-binding protein through a refined screening approach . Key findings about this interaction include:
Angel1 interacts with eIF4E both in vitro and in vivo
The interaction is mediated through a consensus eIF4E-binding motif
Point mutations in this motif disrupt the interaction
Angel1 partially co-localizes with eIF4E and eIF4G, but not with 4E-BP
Unlike other eIF4E-binding proteins, manipulating Angel1 levels has no effect on global translation rates, suggesting a more specific function
To investigate the functional significance of this interaction, researchers should:
Map the precise binding regions through deletion constructs and point mutations
Perform polysome profiling with Angel1 overexpression or knockdown
Analyze translational efficiency of specific mRNAs using ribosome profiling
Investigate whether Angel1 competes with other eIF4E-binding proteins
Determine if the interaction is regulated by cellular conditions (stress, nutrient availability, etc.)
This Angel1-eIF4E interaction appears distinct from canonical translation regulators, potentially representing a specialized regulatory mechanism for specific subsets of mRNAs.
How does Angel1 expression change in response to environmental chemicals and what are the epigenetic mechanisms involved?
Search result provides extensive gene-chemical interaction annotations for Angel1 in rat models, which can inform similar studies in mouse. These data reveal complex patterns of Angel1 regulation in response to environmental exposures:
Chemical | Effect on Angel1 | Mechanism | Evidence | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
1,2-dimethylhydrazine | Decreased expression | Not specified | ISO | PMID:22206623 |
17beta-estradiol | Increased expression | Not specified | ISO | PMID:23019147 |
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxine | Decreased expression | Not specified | EXP | PMID:21215274 |
4,4'-sulfonyldiphenol (bisphenol S) | Increased methylation, decreased expression | Promoter methylation | ISO | PMID:33297965, PMID:39298647 |
Aflatoxin B1 | Decreased methylation | Gene methylation | ISO | PMID:27153756 |
Arsenic | Affects methylation | Gene methylation | ISO | PMID:25304211 |
To investigate these effects in mouse Angel1, researchers should:
Design exposure studies using mouse models or cell lines
Employ qPCR and Western blotting to measure expression changes
Analyze DNA methylation using bisulfite sequencing
Perform ChIP-seq to examine histone modifications
Use CRISPR-based epigenetic editing to confirm causality between epigenetic changes and expression
These approaches would help determine if the epigenetic regulation of Angel1 is conserved between rat and mouse models, and identify potential species-specific differences.
What are the methodological considerations for designing CRISPR-based knockout and knockin studies for Angel1?
When designing CRISPR-based genetic manipulation of Angel1, researchers should consider:
Guide RNA design:
Target exons that are critical for protein function
Avoid regions with high homology to Angel2 to prevent off-target effects
Use multiple bioinformatic tools to predict guide efficiency and specificity
Consider targeting the consensus eIF4E-binding motif to specifically disrupt this interaction
Knockout validation approaches:
Genomic PCR and sequencing to confirm mutations
RT-PCR and Western blotting to verify loss of expression
Immunofluorescence to confirm absence of localization patterns
Functional assays relevant to Angel1's putative roles
Knockin considerations:
For tagging, avoid N-terminal tags that might disrupt mitochondrial targeting
Consider the E121A mutation (or mouse equivalent) that abolishes activity in Drosophila Angel
Design knockin constructs with selectable markers that can be subsequently removed
Include silent mutations in the repair template to prevent re-cutting
Phenotypic analysis:
Assess subcellular localization changes
Examine interactions with known partners like eIF4E
Investigate effects on translation of specific mRNAs
Evaluate mitochondrial parameters if targeting outer mitochondrial membrane functions
This methodological framework accounts for Angel1's unique characteristics while applying standard CRISPR genome editing principles.
How can researchers investigate the potential role of Angel1 in aging and longevity?
Angel1 has been implicated in longevity studies according to search result , which identified Angel1 SNPs among 281 SNPs that discriminate between centenarians and controls in a genome-wide association study. To investigate Angel1's potential role in aging:
Comparative expression analysis:
Measure Angel1 expression across different age groups in mouse tissues
Compare expression between short-lived and long-lived mouse strains
Analyze expression changes in response to lifespan-extending interventions (caloric restriction, rapamycin)
Genetic manipulation approaches:
Generate tissue-specific or inducible Angel1 knockout or overexpression mouse models
Assess lifespan and healthspan parameters
Measure biomarkers of aging (telomere length, senescence markers, etc.)
Molecular pathway analysis:
Investigate interaction with known longevity pathways (mTOR, insulin/IGF-1, sirtuins)
Perform RNA-seq and proteomics to identify affected pathways
Analyze mitochondrial function given Angel1's potential localization to the outer mitochondrial membrane
Human genetic studies:
Validate the SNPs identified in centenarian studies
Perform functional analysis of these variants
Investigate population-specific differences in Angel1 polymorphisms
These methodological approaches would help establish whether Angel1 has a causal role in aging regulation or is merely associated with longevity-related processes.
What approaches can be used to develop Angel1 as a potential therapeutic target?
Developing Angel1 as a therapeutic target would require a systematic research approach:
Target validation:
Comprehensive characterization of Angel1's physiological functions
Identification of disease contexts where Angel1 modulation might be beneficial
Confirmation of Angel1's role through genetic models and pharmacological tools
Druggability assessment:
Structural analysis to identify potential binding pockets
In silico screening to identify potential chemical starting points
Development of robust biochemical assays for Angel1 activity
Compound screening strategies:
High-throughput screening of compound libraries against Angel1's phosphatase activity
Fragment-based approaches to identify chemical scaffolds with binding potential
Structure-based drug design if crystal structures become available
Development of biological approaches:
Evaluation of antisense oligonucleotides or siRNAs for Angel1 knockdown
Assessment of PROTAC approaches for targeted degradation
Investigation of antibody-based approaches for specific contexts
Specificity considerations:
Development of assays to distinguish between effects on Angel1 versus Angel2
Assessment of off-target effects on related phosphatases
Tissue-specific delivery strategies based on expression patterns
This framework provides a roadmap for potential therapeutic development, though substantial basic research on Angel1's functions would be required before pursuing therapeutic applications.