Recombinant Sugp2 has been critical in:
Rabbit polyclonal antibodies against recombinant Sugp2 fragments show reactivity at 1:2,000 dilution in Western blotting .
Validated in cell lines (HEK293T, HeLa) and mouse testis lysates .
Recombinant mouse Sugp2 is typically produced using:
Splicing Regulation: Sugp2 deficiency alters splicing patterns in 1,214 genes, primarily those involved in energy metabolism .
Chromatin Association: Proteomic analysis identified Sugp2 as a chromatin-bound protein during spermatocyte development (Figure 1C in ).
Evolutionary Conservation: 89% sequence similarity between mouse and human Sugp2, suggesting conserved RNA regulatory roles .
Parameter | Specification |
---|---|
Antibody dilution | 1:1,000–1:2,000 |
Blocking buffer | 3% non-fat dry milk in TBST |
Detection | ECL with 5s exposure |
Primer Name | Sequence (5’→3’) |
---|---|
Sugp2-Transcript1-F | AAACCCAAGGACATGGAGTTT |
Sugp2-Transcript1-R | CTATTTGGCCCGCTTGT |
Sugp2-KO-R | CTGCCCTTATCTATGACGCTATGG |
Sugp2 contains two conserved domains: SURP (found in splicing regulators) and G-patch (associated with RNA processing). To validate their activity:
Method: Clone SURP (aa 150–300) and G-patch (aa 400–500) domains into expression vectors for in vitro splicing assays. Use CRISPR-Cas9 to delete these domains in germ cells and perform RNA sequencing to compare splicing events (e.g., SE, MXE) .
Key Data:
Perform combinatorial knockout studies with homologs (e.g., Sugp1) to assess functional redundancy .
Use single-cell RNA-seq to identify compensatory pathways in Sugp2 −/− germ cells.
Validate splicing isoforms via nanopore long-read sequencing to detect truncated/non-functional proteins.
Parameter | WT Testis | Sugp2 −/− Testis |
---|---|---|
Splicing Events | 2,112 SE | 3,673 SE (+74%) |
Fertility Rate | 98% | 95% (no significant difference) |
Source: Spermatogenesis and fertility assays . |
Use co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) with phosphorylated PTBP2 mutants to map interaction interfaces.
Employ in vitro phosphomimetic assays (e.g., Ser178Asp mutation) to test RNA-binding affinity changes .
Critical Controls: Include Sugp1-deficient cells to rule out cross-reactivity.
Conduct metabolomic profiling (e.g., ATP/ADP ratios) in Sugp2 −/− germ cells.
Use chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP-seq) to identify Sugp2-bound loci near metabolic genes (e.g., Atp5a1, Slc39a14) .
Nuclear localization of Sugp2 is stage-specific (enriched in pachytene spermatocytes), making in vitro germ cell cultures insufficient for mimicking in vivo chromatin dynamics .
Solution: Use testicular organoids or stage-synchronized in vivo models combined with CUT&RUN for chromatin occupancy profiling.
Compare brain vs. testis isoforms via nanopore sequencing and isoform-specific knockdown.
Key Insight: Brain isoforms lack exon 5, altering SURP domain topology and RNA-binding specificity .