Transmembrane protein 85 (TMEM85) is a component of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane protein complex (EMC). It facilitates the energy-independent insertion of newly synthesized membrane proteins into the ER membrane. TMEM85 preferentially accommodates proteins with weakly hydrophobic transmembrane domains or those containing destabilizing features such as charged and aromatic residues. It plays a crucial role in the co-translational insertion of multi-pass membrane proteins, where stop-transfer membrane-anchor sequences become ER membrane-spanning helices. Furthermore, it's essential for the post-translational insertion of tail-anchored (TA) proteins into the ER membrane. By mediating the proper co-translational insertion of N-terminal transmembrane domains in an N-exo topology (with the translocated N-terminus in the ER lumen), TMEM85 controls the topology of multi-pass membrane proteins, including G protein-coupled receptors. Through its regulation of protein membrane insertion, TMEM85 indirectly influences numerous cellular processes.
Tmem85 is a previously uncharacterized transmembrane domain protein that has been identified as a novel anti-apoptotic sequence. Research demonstrates that Tmem85 plays a critical role in preventing cell death in response to oxidative stress. The human TMEM85 gene undergoes alternative splicing to produce multiple transcripts and proteins, making it a complex gene with conserved anti-apoptotic properties .
Key functions include:
Protection against oxidative stress-induced cell death
Promotion of cellular growth under stress conditions
Potential interaction with other membrane proteins in signaling pathways
The protein's anti-apoptotic activity has been demonstrated through heterologous expression studies in yeast, where both human TMEM85 and its yeast ortholog (YGL231c) showed protective effects against hydrogen peroxide-mediated cell death .
Tmem85 is a membrane-spanning protein with multiple transmembrane domains. Based on available research data, the protein contains:
Multiple transmembrane helices that anchor the protein in cellular membranes
Conserved domains between species (human and yeast orthologs show functional similarity)
Specific amino acid sequences that are crucial for its anti-apoptotic function
The specific topological arrangement of the protein is still under investigation, with current research focusing on determining which domains are exposed to the cytoplasm versus the extracellular/luminal space.
While comprehensive tissue-specific expression profiles for Tmem85 are still being developed, current research indicates variable expression across tissues. Unlike some other TMEM family proteins that show tissue-specific patterns, Tmem85 appears to have broader expression, consistent with its fundamental role in cellular survival mechanisms .
Future investigations using quantitative PCR and immunohistochemistry are needed to fully characterize tissue-specific expression patterns and regulatory mechanisms controlling Tmem85 gene expression.
Several experimental approaches have proven effective for studying Tmem85 function:
Cell-based assays:
Oxidative stress resistance assays using hydrogen peroxide exposure
Cell viability measurements following Tmem85 overexpression or knockdown
Growth and proliferation assays under various stress conditions
Protein interaction studies:
Dual-membrane yeast two-hybrid system (as used to identify TMEM85 as a GLUT9-interacting protein)
Co-immunoprecipitation assays to confirm physical interactions with other proteins
FRET or BiFC approaches to study protein-protein interactions in living cells
Gene expression manipulation:
Overexpression systems using appropriate expression vectors
RNA interference or CRISPR-Cas9 for knockdown/knockout studies
Inducible expression systems for temporal control of Tmem85 expression
When designing experiments, researchers should consider potential confounding variables such as cell type-specific effects and the impact of oxidative stress levels on experimental outcomes .
A comprehensive experimental design should include:
Treatment variables:
Range of oxidative stress conditions (varying H₂O₂ concentrations)
Time course experiments (acute vs. chronic exposure)
Combined stressors to assess specificity of Tmem85 protection
Control considerations:
Appropriate vector-only controls for overexpression studies
Non-targeting controls for knockdown experiments
Wild-type vs. mutant Tmem85 variants to identify functional domains
Measurement endpoints:
Cell viability (MTT, alamarBlue, or trypan blue exclusion)
Markers of apoptosis (caspase activation, PARP cleavage, Annexin V staining)
ROS detection methods (DCFDA, MitoSOX)
Mitochondrial function assessment (membrane potential, respiration)
Experimental design structure:
| Design element | Implementation | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Randomization | Random assignment of treatment conditions | Minimize systematic bias |
| Blinding | Coded samples for analysis | Prevent observer bias |
| Replication | Minimum 3 independent biological replicates | Ensure reproducibility |
| Positive controls | Known anti-apoptotic proteins (Bcl-2) | Validate assay sensitivity |
| Negative controls | Pro-apoptotic factors | Demonstrate response range |
When analyzing results, researchers should employ appropriate statistical methods to account for variability in biological systems and potential confounding effects .
Based on established protocols for similar transmembrane proteins, the following production conditions are recommended:
Expression systems:
Mammalian expression systems (HEK293, CHO cells) for proper post-translational modifications
Insect cell systems (Sf9, High Five) for higher yields while maintaining eukaryotic processing
E. coli systems with specialized modifications for membrane protein expression
Purification strategies:
Detergent solubilization screening (start with mild detergents like DDM, LMNG)
Affinity purification using appropriate tags (His6 tag is commonly used)
Size exclusion chromatography for final polishing
Quality control parameters:
Purity assessment: >85% purity by SDS-PAGE is typically desired, with visualization by silver staining
Functional validation: Anti-apoptotic activity in cell-based assays
Structural integrity: Circular dichroism or thermal stability assays
Recommended storage conditions include avoiding repeated freeze-thaw cycles and storing at -70°C after reconstitution under sterile conditions for up to 3 months .
Current research indicates that Tmem85 participates in protein interaction networks related to stress response and cell survival:
Known interactions:
GLUT9 (SLC2A9): Tmem85 has been identified as a GLUT9-interacting protein through dual-membrane yeast two-hybrid screening, suggesting potential involvement in urate transport regulation
Hypothesized interaction mechanisms:
Direct physical binding to pro-apoptotic factors, potentially sequestering them
Integration into membrane complexes that regulate stress sensing or signaling
Modulation of mitochondrial membrane permeability through protein-protein interactions
Research approaches to further characterize interactions:
Proximity labeling techniques (BioID, APEX) to identify near-neighbors in the membrane
Crosslinking mass spectrometry to capture direct binding partners
Genetic interaction screens to identify functional partners
Researchers should note that the interaction landscape may differ between cell types and under different stress conditions, necessitating context-specific investigation .
The relationship between Tmem85 and established anti-apoptotic proteins remains to be fully characterized. Current understanding suggests:
Complementary protection mechanisms:
Bcl-2 family proteins primarily target mitochondrial apoptotic pathways
Tmem85 may provide protection through distinct mechanisms, particularly against oxidative stress
Potential pathway integration:
Tmem85 may function upstream or downstream of established anti-apoptotic factors
Cross-talk between Tmem85 and other stress response pathways (e.g., unfolded protein response)
Evolutionary conservation:
Further research using systems biology approaches, including pathway analysis and network modeling, would help position Tmem85 within the broader context of cellular stress response networks.
While specific post-translational modifications (PTMs) of Tmem85 have not been extensively characterized, research on related transmembrane proteins suggests several potential modifications:
Potential PTMs affecting Tmem85:
Phosphorylation: May regulate protein-protein interactions or activation state
Ubiquitination: Could control protein turnover and stability
Glycosylation: May affect protein folding, trafficking, and cell surface expression
Methodological approaches to study PTMs:
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics to identify modification sites
Site-directed mutagenesis of potential modification sites
Pharmacological inhibitors of specific modification enzymes
Subcellular fractionation and immunofluorescence to track localization changes
Researchers should consider that recombinant expression systems may not fully recapitulate the native PTM profile, potentially affecting functional studies with recombinant protein .
Detection of endogenous Tmem85 in tissue samples requires careful consideration of protein abundance and localization:
Immunohistochemistry/Immunofluorescence:
Use validated antibodies specific to mouse Tmem85
Consider antigen retrieval methods optimized for membrane proteins
Include appropriate positive and negative controls
Western blotting:
Optimize membrane protein extraction protocols
Use appropriate detergents for solubilization
Consider enrichment methods for membrane fractions
RNA detection methods:
RT-qPCR for transcript levels
RNA-seq for comprehensive expression analysis
RNA in situ hybridization for spatial expression patterns
Several genetic manipulation approaches can be employed:
RNA interference:
siRNA for transient knockdown (72-96 hours)
shRNA for stable knockdown via lentiviral delivery
Validated siRNA sequences should target conserved regions of Tmem85 mRNA
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing:
Single guide RNA design targeting early exons
Screening for indels that cause frameshift mutations
Verification of knockout by sequencing and protein detection methods
Conditional knockout strategies:
Cre-loxP system for tissue-specific or inducible deletion
Tetracycline-controlled transcriptional activation systems
Verification methods:
RT-qPCR to confirm transcript reduction
Western blotting to verify protein loss
Functional assays to demonstrate phenotypic consequences
Researchers should be aware that complete loss of Tmem85 might affect cell viability, potentially necessitating inducible or partial knockdown approaches for some experimental designs .
Based on published research on Tmem85 and related proteins, the following assays effectively demonstrate anti-apoptotic activity:
Cell viability assays:
MTT or MTS reduction assays
Resazurin-based metabolic assays (alamarBlue)
ATP content measurement
Trypan blue exclusion for membrane integrity
Apoptosis-specific assays:
Annexin V/PI staining for phosphatidylserine externalization
TUNEL assay for DNA fragmentation
Caspase activity assays (especially caspase-3/7)
Mitochondrial membrane potential using JC-1 or TMRE dyes
Oxidative stress challenge models:
Hydrogen peroxide exposure (varying concentrations and durations)
Paraquat or menadione treatment
Glutathione depletion models
Hypoxia/reoxygenation challenges
Experimental design considerations:
| Assay type | Readout | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cell viability | Metabolic activity | Quantitative, high-throughput | Not specific to apoptosis |
| Annexin V | Early apoptosis | Detects early events | Requires flow cytometry |
| Caspase activity | Apoptotic signaling | Mechanism-specific | May miss caspase-independent death |
| Oxidative stress | ROS generation | Models physiological stress | Multiple pathways activated |
Researchers should employ multiple complementary assays to establish a comprehensive profile of Tmem85's anti-apoptotic functions .
While direct evidence linking Tmem85 to neurodegenerative disorders is limited, several theoretical connections warrant investigation:
Oxidative stress connection:
Neurodegenerative diseases involve increased oxidative stress
Tmem85's protective role against oxidative damage suggests potential relevance
Altered Tmem85 function might contribute to neuronal vulnerability
Protein interaction networks:
Research approaches:
Analysis of Tmem85 expression in disease-affected tissues
Genetic association studies for Tmem85 variants in patient populations
Functional studies in neuronal models with disease-relevant stressors
Researchers investigating these connections should consider both cell-autonomous effects in neurons and potential influences on neuroinflammatory processes through interactions with microglial cells .
Recent research on TMEM family proteins suggests potential immune regulatory functions for Tmem85:
Possible mechanisms of immune regulation:
Modulation of immune cell apoptosis during inflammation resolution
Potential regulation of immune cell activation thresholds
Protection against oxidative burst damage in inflammatory environments
Research evidence from TMEM family members:
Some TMEM proteins influence macrophage polarization (M1/M2 balance)
TMEM proteins can affect T cell infiltration and activity in tissue microenvironments
Several TMEM proteins modulate inflammatory cytokine production
While direct evidence for Tmem85's role in immunity is still emerging, its anti-apoptotic function suggests it may protect immune cells from activation-induced cell death or oxidative damage during inflammatory responses. Further research using immune cell-specific Tmem85 manipulation would help clarify these potential functions .
Comparative studies between mouse and human TMEM85 reveal important insights:
Functional conservation:
Both human TMEM85 and mouse Tmem85 exhibit anti-apoptotic properties
The heterologous expression of human TMEM85 in yeast promotes growth and prevents cell death in response to oxidative stress, similar to the function of the yeast ortholog
Structural similarities:
Sequence homology suggests conserved transmembrane topology
Key functional domains appear to be maintained across species
Experimental considerations when comparing species:
Expression level differences may affect functional outcomes
Cellular context (including interacting proteins) may vary between species
Post-translational modification patterns might differ
Research approach for cross-species comparison:
Rescue experiments in knockout models
Direct side-by-side functional assays
Domain swapping between species variants
The high degree of functional conservation suggests mouse models can provide valuable insights into human TMEM85 biology, though species-specific differences should be considered when translating findings .
Ensuring high-quality recombinant Tmem85 preparations requires rigorous quality control:
Purity assessment:
SDS-PAGE analysis with silver staining (target: >85% purity)
Mass spectrometry for identity confirmation
Endotoxin testing for preparations intended for immune cell studies
Functional validation:
Anti-apoptotic activity in cellular assays
Protein interaction verification (e.g., GLUT9 binding)
Proper folding assessment via circular dichroism
Stability parameters:
Thermal stability testing
Freeze-thaw tolerance evaluation
Long-term storage stability monitoring
Documentation requirements:
| Parameter | Acceptable range | Methodology |
|---|---|---|
| Purity | >85% | SDS-PAGE/silver stain |
| Endotoxin | <0.1 EU/μg protein | LAL assay |
| Aggregation | <10% | Size exclusion chromatography |
| Activity | >75% of reference standard | Cell-based assay |
| Identity | Matches theoretical mass | MS/MS analysis |
For collaborative research, standardized quality control reporting facilitates reproducibility across laboratories .
Optimization strategies for Tmem85 expression include:
Mammalian expression systems:
Cell line selection: HEK293T cells often provide good expression of membrane proteins
Vector considerations: CMV promoter for high expression; inducible systems for temporal control
Transfection method: Lipid-based methods typically work well; electroporation for difficult-to-transfect cells
Timing: 24-72 hour expression period depending on experimental needs
Expression optimization:
Codon optimization for improved translation efficiency
Signal sequence modifications for enhanced membrane targeting
Addition of stabilizing fusion tags (e.g., EGFP) for visualization and stability
Temperature modulation (30-37°C) to balance expression and proper folding
Validation approaches:
Western blotting to confirm expression level and molecular weight
Fluorescence microscopy to verify membrane localization (if fluorescently tagged)
Functional assays to confirm biological activity
Researchers should note that overexpression of membrane proteins can sometimes lead to mislocalization or aggregation, necessitating careful optimization of expression levels for functional studies .
Maintaining the functional integrity of purified Tmem85 requires careful handling:
Buffer optimization:
pH stability range determination (typically pH 7.0-7.4 for membrane proteins)
Salt concentration optimization (typically 150-300 mM NaCl)
Addition of stabilizing agents (glycerol 10-20%, specific lipids)
Consideration of detergent types and concentrations for solubilization
Storage recommendations:
Aliquoting to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Flash freezing in liquid nitrogen
Storage at -70°C for long-term stability
Short-term storage at 4°C with appropriate preservatives for active use
Reconstitution guidelines:
Reconstitute lyophilized protein at 200-500 μg/mL in appropriate buffer
Allow complete solubilization before use
Centrifuge to remove any insoluble material
Validate activity after reconstitution
Stability monitoring:
Regular activity testing of stored samples
SDS-PAGE analysis to assess degradation
Dynamic light scattering to monitor aggregation
For functional studies, freshly prepared or minimally manipulated protein preparations typically provide optimal results .
Several cutting-edge technologies hold promise for Tmem85 research:
Structural biology approaches:
Cryo-electron microscopy for membrane protein structure determination
Advanced NMR techniques for dynamic structural studies
In silico molecular dynamics simulations based on homology models
Functional genomics:
CRISPR screens to identify genetic interactions with Tmem85
Single-cell transcriptomics to characterize cellular responses to Tmem85 manipulation
Spatial transcriptomics to map Tmem85 expression in complex tissues
Protein interaction technologies:
Proximity labeling methods (TurboID, APEX2) in live cells
Advanced mass spectrometry for complex membrane protein interactions
Optical techniques for tracking protein interactions in real-time
Therapeutic exploration:
Small molecule screening for Tmem85 modulators
Peptide-based approaches targeting specific Tmem85 domains
RNA-based therapeutics to modulate Tmem85 expression
These emerging approaches could reveal new aspects of Tmem85 biology and potentially lead to therapeutic applications in stress-related pathologies .
AI and computational approaches offer powerful tools for advancing Tmem85 research:
Structure prediction:
AlphaFold2 and RoseTTAFold for accurate protein structure prediction
Molecular dynamics simulations to study conformational changes
Binding site prediction for potential ligand or protein interactions
Systems biology integration:
Network analysis to position Tmem85 in cellular pathways
Multi-omics data integration to understand context-dependent function
Predictive modeling of cellular responses to Tmem85 manipulation
Drug discovery applications:
Virtual screening for Tmem85-targeting compounds
Structure-based drug design for modulators of Tmem85 function
Prediction of off-target effects and optimization of specificity
Experimental design optimization:
Machine learning for optimal experimental parameter selection
Automated image analysis for high-content screening data
Predictive models to prioritize hypotheses for experimental testing
Researchers should leverage these computational approaches while validating predictions with rigorous experimental testing .
Based on Tmem85's anti-apoptotic and stress-protective functions, several therapeutic directions warrant exploration:
Neurodegenerative disorders:
Enhancement of Tmem85 function could protect neurons from oxidative stress
Particularly relevant in conditions with known oxidative components (Parkinson's, ALS)
Could be targeted to specific neuronal populations through advanced delivery systems
Inflammatory conditions:
Modulation of Tmem85 in immune cells might influence inflammation resolution
Potential applications in chronic inflammatory disorders
May help balance protective immunity with tissue damage control
Ischemia-reperfusion injuries:
Cardiac, cerebral, and renal ischemic events involve oxidative damage
Tmem85 enhancement could protect cells during reperfusion phase
Temporary modulation could be achieved through targeted delivery approaches
Drug development considerations:
Small molecule modulators of Tmem85 activity or stability
Gene therapy approaches for Tmem85 delivery
Peptide-based drugs targeting specific Tmem85 interactions
Researchers should consider tissue-specific effects and potential unintended consequences in proliferative disorders when developing Tmem85-targeted therapeutics .