The Recombinant Mouse Transmembrane protein FAM155B is produced using an in vitro E. coli expression system, ensuring high purity and efficiency in protein production . This method allows for controlled conditions and scalability, making it suitable for research applications.
| Characteristics | Description |
|---|---|
| Source | In vitro E. coli expression system |
| Purity | High purity |
| Size | Available upon inquiry |
| Code | CSB-CF008096MO |
FAM155 proteins, including the mouse variant Fam155b, are transmembrane proteins with cysteine-rich domains. While their specific functions are not well-defined, they are believed to play roles in membrane localization and possibly in immune functions, as suggested by their interactions with immune-related proteins . In humans, FAM155B is highly expressed in tissues like the heart, thyroid, and brain, indicating potential roles in these systems .
Future research should focus on elucidating the specific roles of Fam155b in mouse models, exploring its interactions with other proteins, and determining its involvement in disease processes. This could involve studies on its expression in different tissues, its interaction with immune system components, and its potential as a therapeutic target.
KEGG: mmu:620592
UniGene: Mm.388976
FAM155B (also known as NALF2, TED, or TMEM28) is a transmembrane protein consisting of 472 amino acids with a predicted molecular weight of 52.5 kDa and an isoelectric point of approximately 8.2. The protein contains two transmembrane domains and exhibits high expression in heart, thyroid, and brain tissues. Leucine (11.4%) and Proline (10%) are the most prominent amino acids in its composition . The protein belongs to a family whose function remains incompletely characterized by the scientific community, though its structure suggests membrane-associated functionality.
When working with recombinant versions, researchers should note that commercial preparations typically offer partial protein sequences with purity levels >85% as determined by SDS-PAGE analysis . For structural studies, it is essential to consider that there are two known protein isoforms: isoform 1 (340 amino acids) and isoform 2 (292 amino acids) .
The stability of Recombinant Mouse Transmembrane protein FAM155B is influenced by multiple factors including storage state, buffer ingredients, storage temperature, and the intrinsic stability of the protein itself. For optimal preservation:
Lyophilized form maintains stability for approximately 12 months when stored at -20°C/-80°C
Liquid formulations generally maintain stability for up to 6 months at -20°C/-80°C
Repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be strictly avoided to prevent protein degradation
For experiments requiring extended timeframes, researchers should prepare multiple small aliquots after reconstitution rather than storing a single stock solution to minimize freeze-thaw damage.
To ensure optimal protein functionality, follow this methodological approach for reconstitution:
Briefly centrifuge the vial prior to opening to bring contents to the bottom
Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to achieve a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (with 50% being the standard recommendation for long-term storage)
Prepare small aliquots for storage at -20°C/-80°C to minimize freeze-thaw cycles
This reconstitution approach provides the best balance between protein stability and experimental utility. The addition of glycerol serves as a cryoprotectant to minimize structural damage during freezing.
Verification of functional integrity for FAM155B requires multiple analytical approaches:
Primary structure confirmation: Peptide mass fingerprinting or N-terminal sequencing can verify protein identity compared to the expected sequence (UniProt accession A2BDP1) .
Secondary/tertiary structure assessment: Circular dichroism spectroscopy can evaluate whether proper protein folding has been maintained after reconstitution, particularly important for transmembrane proteins.
Functional assays: Since FAM155B (now also known as NALCN channel auxiliary factor 2) may function in ion channel regulation, patch-clamp electrophysiology or fluorescence-based ion flux assays in cells expressing NALCN channels can assess functional activity.
Binding studies: Surface plasmon resonance or co-immunoprecipitation to verify interaction with known binding partners.
For rigorous experimental approaches, researchers should incorporate both positive controls (freshly prepared protein) and negative controls (heat-denatured protein) to establish baseline functional parameters.
When designing experiments involving FAM155B in neuronal tissue, researchers should consider:
Expression pattern analysis:
Verify endogenous expression levels in specific neuronal populations before introducing recombinant protein
Consider developmental timing, as expression may vary across developmental stages
Experimental delivery methods:
For in vitro studies: Lipid-based transfection may be suboptimal due to FAM155B's transmembrane nature; consider viral vectors for neuronal expression
For in vivo studies: Stereotaxic injection of viral vectors expressing FAM155B may provide spatially controlled expression
Functional readouts:
Electrophysiological recordings to assess changes in membrane potential or ion channel activity
Calcium imaging to detect alterations in neuronal signaling
Behavioral assays to evaluate potential effects on neural circuit function
Controls and validation:
Include tagged versions (e.g., GFP-fusion) to track localization
Implement knockdown/knockout controls to establish baseline function
Use structure-function mutants to identify critical domains
The transmembrane nature of FAM155B presents unique experimental challenges that require careful consideration of membrane topology and potential disruption of native protein interactions.
Differentiating between the two known isoforms of FAM155B requires specialized methodological approaches:
For comprehensive isoform analysis, researchers should employ multiple complementary techniques. The 48-amino acid difference between isoforms may result in functional distinctions that could be relevant to experimental outcomes, particularly in studies focusing on protein-protein interactions or localization patterns.
As a transmembrane protein, FAM155B presents inherent solubility challenges that researchers must address methodically:
Buffer optimization strategies:
Test buffers with varying pH (6.5-8.5) to identify optimal solubility conditions
Incorporate mild detergents (0.01-0.1% Triton X-100 or 0.5-1% CHAPS) to maintain membrane protein solubility
Add stabilizing agents such as glycerol (5-10%) or specific divalent cations
Temperature considerations:
Conduct solubility trials at different temperatures (4°C, room temperature, 37°C)
Implement gradual temperature transitions to prevent precipitation
Protein concentration effects:
Titrate protein concentration, starting with lower concentrations (0.01-0.1 mg/mL)
Monitor aggregation using dynamic light scattering at various concentrations
Co-solubilizing factors:
Consider adding specific lipids that might stabilize the native membrane environment
Test protein stabilizing compounds such as arginine or sucrose
When persistent solubility issues occur, researchers might need to explore protein engineering approaches, such as creating soluble domains or fusion constructs that maintain functional epitopes while improving handling characteristics.
Researchers analyzing FAM155B function should be aware of several potential pitfalls:
Overexpression artifacts:
Artificially high expression levels may cause mislocalization or aberrant interactions
Solution: Titrate expression levels and compare with physiological expression patterns
Validate findings using knockin approaches maintaining endogenous regulation
Truncation effects:
Species-specific differences:
Mouse FAM155B may exhibit distinct properties from human orthologs
Solution: Perform comparative studies across species when interpreting translational relevance
Analyze sequence conservation in functional domains
Contextual dependencies:
Function may vary across cell types due to different interaction partners
Solution: Study the protein in multiple relevant cell types
Identify cell-specific binding partners through proximity labeling approaches
Technical limitations:
Antibody cross-reactivity with related family members
Solution: Validate antibody specificity using knockout controls
Employ multiple detection methods for confirmation
Careful experimental design with appropriate controls and validation across multiple methodological approaches can help mitigate these potential pitfalls.
Recent research indicates that FAM155B functions as NALCN channel auxiliary factor 2 (NALF2) , suggesting important roles in ion channel regulation. Researchers can leverage this in several ways:
Electrophysiological studies:
Co-express FAM155B with NALCN channel components in heterologous systems
Compare channel kinetics and conductance properties with and without FAM155B
Perform structure-function analyses by mutating key residues in the transmembrane domains
Protein-protein interaction characterization:
Map interaction domains between FAM155B and NALCN using truncation constructs
Employ proximity labeling techniques (BioID, APEX) to identify additional interacting partners
Perform co-immunoprecipitation studies under varying ionic conditions
Physiological relevance:
Implement conditional knockout approaches in specific tissues
Develop FAM155B modulators to probe functional consequences
Investigate disease models with known ion channel dysregulation
Biophysical approaches:
Reconstruct channel complexes in artificial lipid bilayers
Conduct single-particle cryo-EM to visualize channel complexes with FAM155B
Perform molecular dynamics simulations to predict conformational changes
These approaches can provide insights into the mechanisms by which FAM155B modulates ion channel function, potentially revealing new therapeutic targets for channelopathies.
Comparative approaches can yield valuable insights into FAM155B's core functions:
| Evolutionary Aspect | Methodological Approach | Potential Insights |
|---|---|---|
| Sequence conservation | Phylogenetic analysis across species | Identification of functionally critical domains |
| Expression patterns | Comparative transcriptomics | Tissue-specific roles across evolutionary lineages |
| Protein interactions | Cross-species interactome analysis | Conservation of molecular partnerships |
| Functional conservation | Heterologous expression systems | Functional equivalence across orthologs |
| Structural homology | Comparative modeling | Prediction of functional motifs |
When implementing these approaches, researchers should:
Focus on transmembrane domains, which likely represent functionally conserved regions
Examine conservation patterns in relation to known channelopathies
Correlate evolutionary conservation with tissue-specific expression patterns
Consider the two isoforms separately in evolutionary analyses, as they may have distinct evolutionary trajectories
Analyze selective pressure signatures to identify regions under positive or purifying selection
This evolutionary perspective can provide context for experimental findings and guide hypothesis generation regarding FAM155B's fundamental biological roles.
Several cutting-edge technologies show promise for advancing FAM155B research:
Single-cell multi-omics:
Single-cell transcriptomics coupled with proteomics to map FAM155B expression
Spatial transcriptomics to visualize expression patterns within complex tissues
Single-cell ATAC-seq to identify regulatory elements controlling expression
Advanced imaging techniques:
Super-resolution microscopy for nanoscale localization
Expansion microscopy to visualize protein interactions in intact tissue
Label-free imaging methods to track dynamic changes in native contexts
Functional genomics approaches:
CRISPR interference/activation for temporal control of expression
Prime editing for precise introduction of clinically relevant mutations
Massively parallel reporter assays to identify regulatory elements
Structural biology innovations:
Cryo-electron tomography for in situ structural analysis
Integrative structural biology combining multiple data types
AlphaFold2 predictions validated through targeted experimental approaches
Organoid technologies:
Brain organoids to study function in developing neural tissues
Multi-organ-on-chip systems to examine tissue interactions
Patient-derived organoids for disease modeling
These technologies, applied in concert, can provide a more comprehensive understanding of FAM155B's role in normal physiology and disease states, potentially revealing new therapeutic strategies for conditions involving ion channel dysfunction.
Given FAM155B's expression in brain tissue and potential role in ion channel regulation, researchers investigating neurodevelopmental contexts should consider:
Model system selection:
Appropriate animal models that recapitulate relevant aspects of neurodevelopment
Human iPSC-derived neural cells to capture species-specific functions
Transgenic models with conditional expression during specific developmental windows
Temporal dynamics:
Implement inducible systems to manipulate expression at specific developmental stages
Utilize lineage tracing to track cells expressing FAM155B through development
Perform time-course analyses to identify critical periods
Circuit-level analyses:
Combine electrophysiology with optogenetics to probe functional consequences
Implement connectomics approaches to assess circuit alterations
Use calcium imaging in intact circuits to evaluate signaling changes
Translational considerations:
Correlate findings with human genetic data from neurodevelopmental disorders
Screen for compounds that modulate FAM155B function as potential therapeutic leads
Develop biomarkers for FAM155B dysregulation in accessible patient samples
These methodological approaches can help establish causal relationships between FAM155B dysfunction and specific neurodevelopmental phenotypes, potentially leading to new diagnostic or therapeutic strategies.