Tags: Commonly fused with His or Fc tags for purification and detection
Molecular Weight: 22.1–48.6 kDa (varies by construct and glycosylation)
| Parameter | Specification | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Purity | >95% (SDS-PAGE) | |
| Endotoxin | <1.0 EU/μg (LAL assay) | |
| Activity | Binds TNFSF4 with ED50 <50 μg/mL | |
| Expression Host | Mammalian cells (e.g., HEK293) |
TNFRSF4/OX40 is a co-stimulatory receptor on activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Key functions include:
T-Cell Activation: Enhances survival, proliferation, and cytokine production (e.g., IL-2, IFN-γ) .
Regulatory T-Cell (Treg) Modulation:
Disease Associations:
Mechanism: CML-derived Tregs localize near CTLs in bone marrow and suppress their antileukemic activity .
Intervention: TNFRSF4 stimulation reduces Treg-mediated protection of leukemic cells, enhancing CTL efficacy .
Mouse Models: OX40 deletion reduces atherosclerotic lesions by 40–60% via:
Antibody Studies: Agonistic anti-OX40 antibodies amplify antitumor immunity by expanding effector T cells and destabilizing Tregs .
Clinical Correlation: Elevated TNFRSF4 mRNA in CML patients correlates with FOXP3+ Treg levels .
Mouse OX40/TNFRSF4 is a 454 amino acid type I transmembrane glycoprotein that contains several distinct domains. The protein structure includes:
A 19-21 amino acid signal sequence
A 191-192 amino acid extracellular domain (ECD) with four cysteine-rich domains (CRDs)
A pre-ligand assembly domain (PLAD) that mediates constitutive trimer formation
A 23-25 amino acid transmembrane domain
The ECD of mouse TNFRSF4 shares approximately 63% sequence identity with human TNFRSF4 and about 90% with rat TNFRSF4 . This notable difference in sequence homology between species is important to consider when designing cross-species experiments.
TNFRSF4 is primarily expressed on:
Activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells following TCR engagement
Regulatory T cells (Tregs) where it is constitutively expressed
Expression is upregulated by:
Engagement of the T cell receptor (TCR) by antigen presenting cells
Co-stimulation through CD40-CD40 Ligand interactions
This expression pattern makes TNFRSF4 an important therapeutic target for modulating T cell responses in autoimmunity, cancer, and vaccine development.
| Storage Parameter | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Lyophilized form | Stable for up to 12 months at -20°C to -80°C |
| Reconstitution | Reconstitute at 100-250 μg/mL in sterile PBS |
| Reconstituted solution | Store at 4-8°C for 2-7 days |
| Aliquoted samples | Stable at < -20°C for 3 months |
| Freeze/thaw cycles | Avoid repeated cycles |
For carrier-free versions:
Reconstitute in PBS without BSA when the presence of BSA could interfere with your application
For cell or tissue culture applications, the version with BSA is generally recommended for enhanced stability
Always centrifuge tubes before opening, and aliquot reconstituted protein to minimize freeze-thaw cycles which can significantly reduce biological activity .
Several validated methods have been reported for assessing recombinant mouse TNFRSF4 binding activity:
Functional ELISA: When mouse OX40L is immobilized at 1.0 μg/mL, mouse TNFRSF4-Fc chimera typically binds with an EC50 of 25-100 ng/mL .
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR): SPR analysis reveals that mouse TNFRSF4 binds to mouse OX40L with equilibrium dissociation constants (KD) in the range of 7.61×10⁻⁹ to 20.5×10⁻⁹ M, depending on the exact construct used .
Bio-Layer Interferometry (BLI): When loaded on AR2G Biosensor, mouse OX40L-His can bind mouse OX40-His with an affinity constant of approximately 0.16 μM .
Flow Cytometry: Detection of cell surface expression can be achieved using specific anti-TNFRSF4 antibodies followed by fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies, as demonstrated in L-929 mouse cell line studies .
When evaluating TNFRSF4 agonistic activity, the following controls are essential:
Isotype control antibodies: Use control antibodies (e.g., AB-108-C) alongside test antibodies to confirm binding specificity .
Competitive inhibition controls: Include soluble TNFRSF4 ligand to demonstrate competitive binding.
TNFR1/TNFR2 controls: When studying TNFRSF4-specific effects, include controls for other TNF receptor family members (particularly TNFR1/TNFR2) to exclude off-target effects .
Signaling pathway inhibitors: Include inhibitors like Nec-1s or Sorafenib when assessing downstream signaling to determine pathway specificity .
Cell viability controls: Essential for cytotoxicity assays to distinguish between specific TNFRSF4-mediated effects and general cellular toxicity.
Research has shown that experiments lacking these controls may yield misleading results due to the complex interplay between different TNF receptor family members and their shared downstream signaling pathways .
Research comparing TNFRSF4 and TNFRSF25 agonistic antibodies has revealed important functional differences in their costimulatory effects:
| Parameter | TNFRSF4 (OX40) | TNFRSF25 |
|---|---|---|
| CD8+ T cell proliferation | Strong costimulator (primary and secondary challenge) | Strong costimulator (primary and secondary challenge) |
| CD4+ Tconv proliferation | Potent costimulator | Weak costimulator |
| Treg proliferation | Weak costimulator | Strong costimulator |
| IgG1 production | Moderate | Strong |
| IgG2a production | Weak | Strong |
| IgG2b production | Minimal | Strong |
These differences highlight the non-redundant activities of these receptors in T cell immunity. When used in combination, TNFRSF4 and TNFRSF25 agonists showed additive effects on CD8+ T cell proliferation, suggesting potential synergistic applications in vaccine development and cancer immunotherapy .
Analysis of TCGA datasets has revealed critical correlations between TNFRSF4 expression and genetic mutations in AML:
TNFRSF4 expression was also significantly associated with risk stratification, being higher in intermediate (p = 0.0004) and poor (p = 0.0011) risk groups compared to good prognosis patients. Additionally, relapsed AML samples showed significantly higher TNFRSF4 expression (p = 0.0099) than de novo samples .
These findings suggest TNFRSF4 as a potential prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in AML, warranting further functional and mechanistic studies.
Recent research has identified TNFRSF4-expressing regulatory T cells (Tregs) as key mediators of immune escape in leukemic stem cells (LSCs). In chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) models:
Increased frequency of Tregs was observed in the bone marrow of CML mice compared to naive mice
Close proximity between Tregs and leukemic Gr-1+ cells was demonstrated
A positive correlation existed between Treg frequency and leukemic cell burden
TNFRSF4-expressing Tregs showed enhanced suppressive function against cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs)
Activation of TNFRSF4 signaling on Tregs inhibited anti-leukemic immunity
These findings suggest that targeting TNFRSF4 on Tregs could potentially reduce their immunosuppressive function and enhance anti-leukemic immunity, offering a novel therapeutic approach for leukemia treatment.
Traditional site-directed mutagenesis approaches for creating TNFRSF4-selective agonists have shown limited success, with resulting mutants often demonstrating reduced binding affinity. More successful strategies include:
Phage display technique: This approach has yielded TNFRSF4-selective TNF mutants with both high receptor specificity and full bioactivity. For example, clone 7 demonstrated strong binding to mouse TNFRSF4 (KD = 7.61 nM) with minimal binding to TNFR1 .
Competitive panning methods: This refinement to phage display has produced optimized agonists with superior selectivity profiles.
Structure-guided design: Based on the three-dimensional structure of the TNF-TNFR complex to create mutations at key receptor-binding interfaces.
Notably, there are species differences between human and mouse TNFRSF4, requiring species-specific optimization. For example, human TNFRSF4-selective TNF mutants (like R2-7) do not bind mouse TNFRSF4, necessitating separate development programs for preclinical and clinical applications .
Several approaches have been validated for enhancing the stability and activity of recombinant TNFRSF4:
Fc fusion proteins: Incorporating an Fc domain (typically human IgG1 or mouse IgG2a) significantly increases serum half-life and enhances receptor clustering through FcγR binding. Recombinant TNFRSF4-Fc chimeras demonstrate improved stability while maintaining binding specificity .
His-tagging strategies: Addition of 6-His tags facilitates purification while minimally impacting biological activity. His-tagged TNFRSF4 constructs maintain binding to OX40L with affinity constants in the sub-micromolar range .
Oligomerization enhancement: Strategies to increase ligand stability and clustering among ligand-receptor complexes include:
Carrier protein addition: Addition of BSA as a carrier protein enhances stability, increases shelf-life, and allows for storage at more dilute concentrations .
The choice of modification strategy should be guided by the specific experimental application, with carrier-free versions preferred for applications where BSA might interfere with results.
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis has revealed important differences in the binding kinetics between wild-type TNF and TNFRSF4-selective mutants:
| Parameter | Wild-type TNF | TNFRSF4-selective mutants (e.g., Clone 7) |
|---|---|---|
| Association (kon) | Slow association rate | Quick association rate |
| Dissociation (koff) | Slow dissociation rate | Quick dissociation rate |
| Maximum binding response (Rmax) | Higher | Lower |
| Equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) | ~10.4×10⁻⁹ M | ~7.61×10⁻⁹ M (for Clone 7) |
| EC50 value | 3.01 ng/ml | 0.48 ng/ml (for Clone 7) |
This kinetic information is crucial for researchers designing therapeutic approaches targeting TNFRSF4, as it helps predict in vivo behavior and potential off-target effects.
TNFRSF4 agonism has distinct effects on T cell subsets that are relevant for vaccine development:
| T Cell Subset | Effect of TNFRSF4 Agonism | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| CD8+ T cells | Enhanced proliferation and survival | Increased cytokine production; prevention of activation-induced cell death |
| CD4+ Tconv cells | Potent costimulation of proliferation | Enhanced division and cytokine production |
| Tregs | Weak to moderate proliferation | Increased sensitivity to IL-2; potential decrease in suppressive function |
| Memory T cells | Enhanced maintenance and recall response | Promotion of memory cell formation and survival |
These differential effects position TNFRSF4 agonists as potential vaccine adjuvants that can:
Enhance CD8+ T cell responses against intracellular pathogens and tumors
Boost CD4+ helper T cell responses to support antibody production
Potentially limit Treg-mediated suppression of vaccine responses
Studies have demonstrated that TNFRSF4 agonism can provide strong costimulatory signals in both primary and secondary antigen challenges, making it valuable for both prime and boost vaccination strategies .
TNFRSF4 plays complex and sometimes paradoxical roles in regulatory T cell (Treg) function across different disease models: