Recombinant Mycobacterium abscessus Peptide chain release factor 1 (prfA)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Overview of Peptide Chain Release Factor 1 (PrfA)

Peptide chain release factors (RFs) are essential for translation termination. In bacteria, RF1 (PrfA) recognizes stop codons UAA and UAG, facilitating the release of nascent polypeptides from ribosomes. While prfA homologs are well-studied in Escherichia coli and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, no specific studies on M. abscessus PrfA were found in the provided sources.

Recombinant Protein Production in M. abscessus

The development of recombinant proteins in M. abscessus is challenging due to its intrinsic antibiotic resistance and genetic complexity. Key findings from the search results include:

  • Genetic tools: Conditional gene expression systems (e.g., TetR/PipOFF) have been adapted for M. abscessus to study essential genes like fadD32 .

  • Antibiotic resistance: Genes such as MAB_2355c (ribosome protection) and arr (rifampicin inactivation) are overexpressed in recombinant studies .

Potential Research Directions for M. abscessus PrfA

To explore prfA in M. abscessus, the following approaches are recommended:

Genomic and Proteomic Analysis

  • Homology search: Compare prfA sequences from M. tuberculosis or E. coli against M. abscessus genomes (e.g., using NCBI BLAST).

  • Functional annotation: Identify conserved domains (e.g., GGQ motif for ribosome binding) using tools like InterPro or Pfam.

Experimental Validation

  • CRISPR knockdown: Assess the essentiality of prfA using methods validated for M. abscessus genes like sigM or mbtD .

  • Recombinant expression: Clone prfA into M. abscessus-optimized vectors (e.g., pMC30A ) and evaluate termination efficiency via in vitro transcription-translation assays .

Challenges and Limitations

  • Antibiotic interference: M. abscessus’s multidrug resistance (e.g., macrolide resistance via erm(41) ) complicates selection markers for recombinant studies.

  • Lack of structural data: No crystal structures or enzymatic activity data for M. abscessus PrfA are currently available.

Recommendations for Future Studies

  1. Leverage existing datasets: Analyze M. abscessus transcriptomes (e.g., RNAseq data from RIF-exposed strains ) for prfA expression patterns.

  2. Collaborative efforts: Cross-reference with M. tuberculosis RF1 studies to predict functional mechanisms.

  3. High-throughput screening: Use libraries like the M. abscessus Tn mutant collection to identify prfA-linked phenotypes.

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will preferentially ship the available format, but please specify any format requirements when ordering, and we will accommodate your request.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary by purchase method and location. Consult your local distributor for specific delivery information. All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Request dry ice shipping in advance for an extra fee.
Notes
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer components, storage temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form is generally stable for 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form is generally stable for 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
prfA; MAB_1442; Peptide chain release factor 1; RF-1
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-356
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Mycobacterium abscessus (strain ATCC 19977 / DSM 44196 / CIP 104536 / JCM 13569 / NCTC 13031 / TMC 1543)
Target Names
prfA
Target Protein Sequence
MSETPLIDAM LAEHAELEKQ LADPALHADA AAARKAGRRF AMLSPIVATH RKLATARDDL ATARELSADD PSFADEVTEL ESSIAELETQ LSDMLAPRDP HDGDDILLEV KSGEGGEESA LFAADLARMY IRYAERHGWK VTVLDETESD LGGYKDATLA IASKGDSADG VWSRLKFEGG VHRVQRVPVT ESQGRVHTSA AGVLVYPEPE EVEEIQIDES DLRIDVYRSS GKGGQGVNTT DSAVRITHLP TGIVVTCQNE RSQLQNKARA MQVLAARLQA LAEEQAQADA SAGRASQIRT VDRSERIRTY NFPENRITDH RVGFKAHNLD QVLDGDLDAL FDALAAADRK ARLQEA
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Peptide chain release factor 1 terminates translation in response to the stop codons UAG and UAA.
Database Links

STRING: 561007.MAB_1442

Protein Families
Prokaryotic/mitochondrial release factor family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is Mycobacterium abscessus and why is it clinically significant?

Mycobacterium abscessus is a multidrug-resistant non-tuberculous mycobacterium (NTM) that causes progressive lung damage, particularly in individuals with cystic fibrosis. The infection is extremely challenging to treat due to its intrinsic resistance to multiple antibiotics. M. abscessus has three recognized subspecies: M. abscessus abscessus, M. abscessus masiliense, and M. abscessus bollettii, with 96.6-99.8% average nucleotide identity among them . The pathogen has become increasingly concerning as evidence suggests potential person-to-person transmission, contrasting with the previous belief that NTM infections were exclusively acquired from environmental sources .

What is the function of Peptide chain release factor 1 (prfA) in mycobacterial protein synthesis?

Peptide chain release factor 1 (prfA) in mycobacteria plays a crucial role in translation termination by recognizing stop codons (primarily UAA and UAG) in mRNA. When ribosomes encounter these stop codons, prfA facilitates the hydrolysis of the ester bond between the completed polypeptide chain and the tRNA, thereby releasing the newly synthesized protein. In mycobacteria, including M. abscessus, proper translation termination is essential for producing functional proteins involved in virulence, drug resistance, and survival mechanisms within host cells.

How does M. abscessus differ from other mycobacterial species in terms of genetic characteristics?

M. abscessus distinguishes itself from other mycobacterial species, including M. tuberculosis, through several genetic characteristics. Unlike M. tuberculosis, M. abscessus possesses genes encoding ADP-ribosyltransferases (such as Mab_arr) that confer intrinsic resistance to rifampicin by ribosylating the drug and preventing its binding to RNA polymerase . Additionally, M. abscessus contains regulatory elements like the RIF associated element (RAE), a highly conserved 19-bp inverted repeat sequence upstream of genes involved in rifamycin resistance . The genome of M. abscessus also includes distinct helicases such as Mab_helR that contribute to antibiotic resistance mechanisms not found in M. tuberculosis.

What are the optimal expression systems for producing recombinant M. abscessus prfA?

For recombinant expression of M. abscessus prfA, Escherichia coli-based expression systems are commonly employed, particularly when using vectors with T7 promoters for high-level expression. The methodology should include codon optimization for E. coli if necessary, as mycobacterial genes often have GC-rich sequences that may limit expression efficiency. For proper folding and function, expression conditions typically involve induction at lower temperatures (16-25°C) with reduced IPTG concentrations (0.1-0.5 mM) to minimize inclusion body formation. Alternative expression hosts such as Mycobacterium smegmatis may better preserve native protein folding and post-translational modifications, though with lower yields compared to E. coli systems.

What purification strategies yield the highest purity and activity for recombinant M. abscessus prfA?

A multi-step purification approach is recommended for obtaining high-purity, functional recombinant M. abscessus prfA. Initial capture can be achieved using affinity chromatography (typically His-tag based Ni-NTA), followed by ion-exchange chromatography to separate the target protein from contaminants with different charge properties. For maximum purity, size-exclusion chromatography should be employed as a polishing step. Throughout purification, buffer conditions should be optimized to maintain protein stability, typically including 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5-8.0), 150-300 mM NaCl, 5-10% glycerol, and potentially 1-5 mM DTT or β-mercaptoethanol to prevent oxidation of cysteine residues. Maintaining samples at 4°C during purification helps preserve activity and prevent proteolytic degradation.

How can researchers verify the structural integrity and activity of purified recombinant prfA?

Verification of structural integrity should include both biophysical and functional approaches. Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy can confirm secondary structure elements, while thermal shift assays evaluate protein stability. For functional validation, in vitro translation termination assays using synthetic mRNAs containing stop codons can assess prfA activity by measuring polypeptide release from ribosome complexes. Additionally, surface plasmon resonance or isothermal titration calorimetry can determine binding affinities to ribosomes or nucleotides. For oligomeric state assessment, analytical ultracentrifugation or size-exclusion chromatography coupled with multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS) should be employed.

How can researchers design experiments to study prfA's role in M. abscessus drug resistance?

To investigate prfA's potential role in drug resistance, researchers should implement a multi-faceted approach. First, generate prfA knockout mutants using homologous recombination or CRISPR-Cas9 systems, followed by complementation with wild-type and site-directed mutants to confirm phenotypes. Perform comparative minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing against various antibiotics, using the resazurin microtiter assay method as described for M. abscessus . This involves incubating bacteria with serial dilutions of antibiotics, adding resazurin solution, and measuring fluorescence of the metabolite resorufin (λex/λem = 530/590 nm) to determine MIC50 and MIC90 values . Combine these phenotypic assays with transcriptomic analyses (RNA-seq) to identify genes differentially expressed in response to antibiotic exposure in wild-type versus prfA mutant strains, potentially revealing regulatory networks involving prfA.

What methods are effective for studying prfA interactions with the M. abscessus ribosome?

To study prfA-ribosome interactions in M. abscessus, researchers should employ a combination of structural and biochemical approaches. Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) can visualize prfA bound to the ribosome at near-atomic resolution, revealing key interaction sites. For identifying specific interaction residues, hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) can map regions of prfA protected upon ribosome binding. In vitro binding assays using surface plasmon resonance or microscale thermophoresis with purified components can quantify interaction kinetics and affinity constants. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments using tagged prfA followed by mass spectrometry can identify not just ribosomal components but also other factors that may regulate prfA function in the cellular context. Site-directed mutagenesis of conserved residues can further validate key interaction sites.

How can recombinant prfA be used to screen for novel antimycobacterial compounds?

Recombinant M. abscessus prfA enables development of high-throughput screening assays for identification of novel inhibitors that could serve as leads for antimycobacterial drug development. A fluorescence-based translation termination assay can be established where successful termination results in release of a fluorescent reporter from the ribosome complex. Compounds that inhibit prfA will show reduced fluorescence signal. This primary screen should be followed by counter-screens to eliminate compounds that directly affect the reporter or ribosome function. Selected hits should undergo validation through surface plasmon resonance or isothermal titration calorimetry to confirm direct binding to prfA. The most promising compounds should then be tested for antimycobacterial activity against M. abscessus using the resazurin microtiter assay methodology , with evaluation of cytotoxicity toward human cell lines to establish a preliminary therapeutic index.

How does prfA expression change during M. abscessus infection of macrophages?

To investigate prfA expression during macrophage infection, researchers should utilize a methodology similar to that described for other M. abscessus genes . This involves infecting bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) with M. abscessus at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10, followed by washing to remove extracellular bacteria. RNA should be extracted from intracellular bacteria at various time points (3, 24, 48, and 72 hours post-infection) and analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR using specific primers for prfA. Gene expression should be calculated using the 2^(-ΔΔCT) method with 16S rRNA as a normalizer . In parallel, CFU determination should be performed to correlate expression changes with bacterial survival. Microscopic analysis using Instant-Prov staining of infected macrophages at 24 and 72 hours can provide visual confirmation of bacterial internalization and potential correlation with expression data.

How can researchers investigate the potential role of prfA in M. abscessus virulence using animal models?

Investigation of prfA's role in virulence requires development of appropriate animal models that recapitulate key aspects of human M. abscessus infection. Researchers should generate prfA knockout and complemented strains, then compare their virulence in mouse models of pulmonary infection. C57BL/6 mice can be infected via aerosol or intratracheal instillation with wild-type and mutant strains. Disease progression should be monitored through bacterial load determination in lungs and other organs, histopathological analysis of tissue sections, and measurement of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Survival studies will provide definitive evidence of virulence attenuation. For more human-relevant models, consider using immunocompromised mice or those with cystic fibrosis-like lung conditions. Single-cell RNA sequencing of infected lung tissue can provide insights into host-pathogen interactions at cellular resolution, potentially revealing how prfA modulates the host immune response.

What is the potential cross-talk between prfA function and antibiotic resistance mechanisms in M. abscessus?

Investigating the relationship between prfA and established antibiotic resistance mechanisms in M. abscessus requires an integrated experimental approach. Researchers should first determine if prfA expression changes in response to antibiotic exposure using qRT-PCR analysis similar to the experiments that demonstrated upregulation of Mab_helR upon rifampicin treatment . The presence of regulatory elements like the RIF associated element (RAE) in the prfA promoter region should be assessed through bioinformatic analysis and validated with reporter gene assays. Potential physical interactions between prfA and known antibiotic resistance proteins can be investigated through co-immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry. Ribosome profiling (Ribo-seq) in wild-type and prfA mutant strains treated with various antibiotics can reveal changes in translation of resistance genes. Finally, genetic epistasis experiments combining prfA mutations with known resistance mutations (e.g., in Mab_arr or Mab_helR) can establish functional relationships in antibiotic resistance pathways.

How does M. abscessus prfA differ structurally and functionally from prfA in M. tuberculosis?

Comparative analysis of M. abscessus and M. tuberculosis prfA requires both bioinformatic and experimental approaches. Sequence alignment and homology modeling can identify conserved domains and subspecies-specific variations. Key differences in substrate specificity can be assessed through in vitro termination assays using ribosomes and mRNAs from both species. The interaction with species-specific ribosomal components should be evaluated through pull-down assays and surface plasmon resonance. X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM structures of both proteins would provide definitive structural comparisons. Additionally, complementation experiments where M. tuberculosis prfA is expressed in M. abscessus prfA mutants (and vice versa) can determine functional interchangeability and identify species-specific activities potentially relevant to pathogenesis or antibiotic resistance.

How can structural biology approaches advance our understanding of M. abscessus prfA function?

Structural biology offers powerful tools for understanding M. abscessus prfA at the molecular level. Researchers should pursue high-resolution structures using X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM, both in isolation and in complex with the ribosome. These structures can reveal the molecular basis for stop codon recognition, GTP binding, and catalytic activity. Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) can map conformational changes upon binding to different substrates or in response to environmental conditions. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is particularly valuable for studying dynamics and weak interactions with potential drug candidates. Molecular dynamics simulations based on experimental structures can predict the effects of mutations or drug binding. Integration of structural data with functional assays can validate key residues and inform structure-based drug design targeting M. abscessus prfA as a novel therapeutic approach.

Table 1: Comparison of Expression Systems for Recombinant M. abscessus prfA Production

Expression SystemAdvantagesDisadvantagesTypical Yield (mg/L culture)Recommended Applications
E. coli BL21(DE3)High yield, rapid growth, simple protocolsMay form inclusion bodies, lacks mycobacterial chaperones10-15Structural studies, antibody production
E. coli Rosetta(DE3)Supplies rare codons, improves expression of GC-rich genesHigher cost, may still have folding issues8-12Expression of codon-biased mycobacterial proteins
M. smegmatis mc²155Native-like folding, proper post-translational modificationsLower yield, longer growth time, more complex protocols1-3Functional studies, protein-protein interaction studies
Cell-free systemsRapid, avoids toxicity issues, allows incorporation of modified amino acidsHigh cost, limited scale0.5-2Mechanistic studies, incorporation of unnatural amino acids
Mammalian cells (HEK293)Human-like glycosylation, suitable for immunological studiesVery low yield, expensive, complex protocols0.1-0.5Studies of prfA interaction with host factors

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.