Recombinant Mycobacterium tuberculosis UPF0233 membrane protein MRA_0013 (UniProt ID: A5TY81) is a full-length (93 amino acid) protein encoded by the crgA gene. Synonyms include MRA_0013 and Cell division protein CrgA. This protein is expressed in E. coli with an N-terminal His tag for purification and functional studies .
| Parameter | Detail |
|---|---|
| Gene Name | crgA |
| Protein Length | 1–93 amino acids (Full Length) |
| Tag | N-terminal His tag |
| Purity | >90% (SDS-PAGE) |
| Storage Buffer | Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose, pH 8.0 |
| Reconstitution | Deionized sterile water (0.1–1.0 mg/mL) with 5–50% glycerol |
The sequence of MRA_0013 is:
MPKSKVRKKNDFTVSAVSRTPMKVKVGPSSVWFVSLFIGLMLIGLIWLMVFQLAAIGSQA PTALNWMAQLGPWNYAIAFAFMITGLLLTMRWH .
MRA_0013 is expressed in E. coli as a soluble recombinant protein. Key production details:
| Attribute | Specification |
|---|---|
| Expression System | E. coli |
| Tagging | N-terminal His tag for affinity chromatography |
| Purification | Nickel affinity chromatography |
| Stability | Lyophilized powder; avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles |
Purity: Confirmed via SDS-PAGE (>90%) and Western blotting (His tag detection) .
Reconstitution: Recommended in deionized water with glycerol (5–50%) for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C .
MRA_0013 is used in ELISA kits for detecting host immune responses to M. tuberculosis. Key features of such kits include:
| Parameter | Detail |
|---|---|
| Target | Serum or plasma antibodies against MRA_0013 |
| Sensitivity | Not explicitly stated in sources; inferred from recombinant quality |
| Specificity | His-tagged protein reduces cross-reactivity with host proteins |
| Storage | -20°C; glycerol-stabilized buffer ensures stability |
While no clinical validation data is provided, this protein’s inclusion in diagnostic assays highlights its potential as a candidate antigen for distinguishing latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) from active tuberculosis (aTB), similar to latency-associated antigens like Rv0081 or Rv1733c .
Current literature lacks direct studies on MRA_0013’s role in M. tuberculosis pathogenesis. Unlike well-characterized virulence factors (e.g., PtpA, which modulates host lipid metabolism ), MRA_0013’s mechanism remains undefined.
While MRA_0013 is listed in diagnostic kits , its performance compared to established antigens (e.g., ESAT-6, CFP-10) is unvalidated. The broader M. tuberculosis membrane proteome remains understudied, with only ~300 novel antigens tested for immunodiagnostic potential .
KEGG: mra:MRA_0013
STRING: 419947.MtubH3_010100008937
MRA_0013 belongs to the UPF0233 family of membrane proteins found in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The UPF (Uncharacterized Protein Family) designation indicates limited functional characterization to date. Based on comparative analysis with other membrane proteins in mycobacteria, MRA_0013 likely participates in cellular processes related to bacterial survival, membrane integrity, or pathogenesis.
The functional characterization of MRA_0013 would typically involve multiple complementary approaches:
Comparative genomic analysis across mycobacterial species
Transcriptomic profiling under various growth conditions
Loss-of-function studies using CRISPR interference (CRISPRi)
Protein-protein interaction studies to identify binding partners
Localization studies to determine membrane distribution
Similar to research approaches for other membrane proteins, CRISPRi techniques can be particularly valuable for studying MRA_0013 function through targeted gene repression .
Several expression systems can be considered for recombinant production of MRA_0013, each with distinct advantages:
| Expression System | Advantages | Disadvantages | Recommended Tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yield, easy handling | Potential misfolding | His6, MBP, SUMO |
| M. smegmatis | Native-like environment | Slower growth | His6, FLAG |
| rBCG | Very native-like | Complex handling | His6, HA |
| Cell-free | Works with toxic proteins | Lower yield | His6, Strep |
For mycobacterial membrane proteins, the rBCG (recombinant Bacillus Calmette-Guérin) system has shown particular promise for maintaining native protein conformation. This approach has been successfully used for expressing other mycobacterial proteins and could be adapted for MRA_0013 expression .
The choice of expression system should be guided by downstream applications. For structural studies requiring high purity, E. coli systems may be preferable, while for functional studies, mycobacterial expression systems provide a more native-like environment that preserves proper folding and post-translational modifications .
Verification of successful MRA_0013 expression requires a multi-faceted approach:
Transcriptional verification: Quantitative PCR (qPCR) can confirm expression at the mRNA level before proceeding to protein detection, similar to approaches used for verifying expression of other membrane proteins .
Protein detection: Western blotting using antibodies against epitope tags (His, FLAG, etc.) incorporated into the recombinant construct. For untagged constructs, custom antibodies against MRA_0013 would be necessary.
Mass spectrometry verification: SDS-PAGE followed by mass spectrometry to confirm protein identity and integrity. This approach can also identify any post-translational modifications.
Membrane localization confirmation: Membrane fractionation followed by Western blotting to verify proper targeting to the membrane fraction. This is essential for confirming proper folding and insertion of membrane proteins.
Functional assays: If molecular function becomes known, specific activity assays can verify not just expression but also proper folding and activity.
When designing expression constructs, careful consideration should be given to tag placement, as N-terminal or C-terminal tags may interfere with membrane insertion or protein function .
Purification of membrane proteins like MRA_0013 presents specific challenges requiring specialized approaches:
Membrane extraction: Selection of appropriate detergents is critical for solubilization while maintaining protein structure and function. Common detergents include:
n-Dodecyl β-D-maltoside (DDM)
n-Octyl β-D-glucopyranoside (OG)
Digitonin (for gentle extraction)
CHAPS (zwitterionic detergent)
Affinity chromatography: His-tag purification is commonly employed as the first step, but buffer composition must be optimized to maintain protein stability. Inclusion of glycerol (10-20%) and appropriate detergent concentrations is essential.
Size exclusion chromatography: This serves as a critical second purification step to obtain homogeneous protein preparations and remove aggregates.
Alternative membrane mimetics: Transition from detergents to more stable environments:
Nanodiscs for a native-like lipid bilayer environment
Amphipols for enhanced stability
Lipid cubic phase for crystallization attempts
Detergent-resistant membrane fractions have been successfully used for purifying certain membrane proteins, and similar approaches might be adapted for mycobacterial membrane proteins like MRA_0013, with consideration for the different membrane composition of mycobacteria .
Multiple complementary techniques should be employed to comprehensively assess the stability and quality of purified MRA_0013:
Thermal shift assays: These determine protein thermal stability under different buffer conditions, detergents, or stabilizing additives. The melting temperature (Tm) provides a quantitative measure of stability.
Dynamic light scattering (DLS): This non-destructive technique assesses the homogeneity of protein preparations and can detect aggregation. Monodisperse samples typically indicate well-folded protein.
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy: This provides information about secondary structure content, confirming proper folding. For membrane proteins, CD can verify the alpha-helical content expected in transmembrane domains.
Limited proteolysis: Controlled digestion with proteases can identify stable, well-folded domains that resist proteolysis. The digestion pattern can be analyzed by SDS-PAGE or mass spectrometry.
Analytical ultracentrifugation: This determines the oligomeric state and homogeneity of the protein preparation.
For membrane proteins, environment-sensitive probes can assess proper integration into membrane mimetics, similar to approaches used for other membrane proteins .
Several sophisticated techniques can be applied to study MRA_0013 localization and dynamics:
Fluorescent protein fusions: Creating fusions with fluorescent proteins (GFP, mCherry) allows visualization in live bacteria. Care must be taken to ensure the fusion doesn't disrupt protein function or localization.
Super-resolution microscopy: Techniques that overcome the diffraction limit provide detailed localization information:
Stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy
Photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM)
Single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM)
Immunogold electron microscopy: This provides nanometer-scale resolution for precise localization within the complex mycobacterial cell envelope.
Single-particle tracking: This reveals protein dynamics within the membrane, including diffusion rates and potential confinement in specific domains.
Environment-sensitive probes: These can detect the protein's association with specific membrane environments, similar to techniques used to study plant plasma membrane proteins .
Advanced imaging studies can determine whether MRA_0013 is distributed uniformly or segregated into functional domains within the membrane, similar to the nanodomain organization observed in plant membrane proteins .
Developing a CRISPRi system for studying MRA_0013 function requires a systematic approach:
Generation of a stable M. tuberculosis strain expressing dCas9-KRAB: Create a strain expressing the catalytically inactive Cas9 fused to a transcriptional repressor domain, similar to the approach described for human cell lines .
sgRNA design for MRA_0013: Design multiple sgRNAs targeting the promoter region or transcription start site (TSS). Based on documented CRISPRi approaches, designing sgRNAs that target the proximity of the TSS is critical for effective gene repression .
| Considerations for sgRNA Design | Recommendations |
|---|---|
| Target location | -200 to +100 bp relative to TSS |
| Number of sgRNAs to test | Minimum 3-5 |
| GC content | 40-60% |
| Off-target threshold | >3 mismatches |
| Expression system | U6 promoter-driven |
Validation of knockdown efficiency: Perform qPCR analysis to assess the efficiency of different sgRNAs. As demonstrated in other CRISPRi systems, significant variation in knockdown efficiency can occur between different sgRNAs targeting the same gene .
Off-target analysis: Conduct in silico analysis using tools like Cas-OFFinder to identify potential off-targets. This is essential for confirming the specificity of the CRISPRi approach .
Phenotypic analysis: Perform assays to assess the impact of MRA_0013 knockdown on bacterial growth, survival under stress conditions, and virulence in infection models.
The development of inducible CRISPRi systems allows for temporal control of gene knockdown, which is particularly valuable for studying essential genes or for time-course experiments .
Several complementary techniques can be employed to comprehensively characterize protein-protein interactions involving MRA_0013:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): This identifies interacting protein partners in a near-native context. For membrane proteins like MRA_0013, specialized detergents that preserve protein-protein interactions should be used.
Crosslinking mass spectrometry: This identifies interaction interfaces and is particularly valuable for membrane proteins. Chemical crosslinkers with different spacer lengths can capture both direct and proximal interactions.
Bacterial two-hybrid systems: These are useful for screening potential interacting partners in a bacterial context, though may be challenging for full-length membrane proteins.
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR): This provides quantitative binding information including association and dissociation rates. For membrane proteins, specialized sensor chips containing lipid bilayers can be utilized.
Biolayer interferometry (BLI): This provides real-time binding data with minimal protein consumption, making it suitable for difficult-to-express membrane proteins.
Protein-lipid interactions: Lipidomic analysis could reveal interactions with specific lipids, which may be essential for proper function. This approach has been used successfully for other membrane proteins that co-purify with specific lipids like sterols and phosphoinositides .
The combination of multiple interaction detection methods provides the most comprehensive and reliable characterization of protein-protein interactions.
Analyzing the role of MRA_0013 in pathogenesis requires a multi-faceted approach spanning in vitro and in vivo models:
In vitro infection models:
Macrophage infection assays comparing wild-type versus MRA_0013 knockdown strains
Analysis of bacterial survival, growth, and host cell responses
Evaluation of cytokine responses and inflammasome activation
Animal models:
Infection studies in mice using wild-type versus modified strains
Measurement of bacterial burden in lungs and other organs
Histopathological assessment of tissue damage
Survival studies to assess virulence
Immune response analysis:
Characterization of T cell responses using flow cytometry
Analysis of memory T cell populations (TCM, TEM, TRM)
Cytokine profiling to assess Th1/Th17 polarization
Based on approaches used in M. tuberculosis vaccine research, analyzing T cell responses could include flow cytometry characterization of:
Polyfunctional T cells producing multiple cytokines
Central memory T cells (TCM)
Effector memory T cells (TEM)
Host-pathogen interaction studies:
Identification of host factors that interact with MRA_0013
Impact on phagosomal maturation and survival
| Immune Parameter | Technical Approach | Key Readouts |
|---|---|---|
| T cell activation | Flow cytometry | CD44, CD69, CD25 expression |
| Memory T cell subsets | Flow cytometry | CD44+CD62L+ (TCM), CD44+CD62L- (TEM) |
| Cytokine production | ELISA, flow cytometry | IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, IL-17 levels |
| Bacterial burden | CFU determination | Log reduction in organs |
These approaches provide comprehensive assessment of how MRA_0013 contributes to pathogenesis and modulates host immune responses .
Several complementary techniques can be applied to determine the structure of membrane proteins like MRA_0013:
A combined approach using multiple structural techniques typically provides the most comprehensive structural understanding of membrane proteins .
Working with membrane proteins like MRA_0013 presents several challenges that require specific strategies:
Low expression yields:
Solution: Optimize codon usage for mycobacterial expression
Test different promoters and induction conditions
Use specialized strains designed for membrane protein expression
Consider fusion partners such as MBP or SUMO that enhance solubility
Protein aggregation:
Solution: Screen multiple detergents and concentrations
Use milder extraction conditions to prevent denaturation
Consider nanodiscs or amphipols for stabilization
Include stabilizing additives like glycerol or specific lipids
Loss of function during purification:
Solution: Validate function at each purification step
Use detergent-free extraction methods when possible
Reconstitute into liposomes to restore native environment
Minimize exposure to harsh conditions
Difficulty in crystallization:
Solution: Use lipidic cubic phase crystallization
Try antibody fragment co-crystallization
Consider fusion with crystallization chaperones
Use surface entropy reduction mutations
Limited stability of purified protein:
Solution: Optimize buffer conditions (pH, salt, additives)
Include specific lipids that might stabilize the protein
Store at optimal temperature with appropriate protease inhibitors
Approaches similar to those used for expressing other challenging membrane proteins can be adapted for MRA_0013 .
Determining the essentiality of MRA_0013 requires carefully designed genetic approaches:
Conditional knockdown systems:
CRISPRi with inducible promoters controlling dCas9 or sgRNA expression
Tetracycline-responsive repression systems
Degradation tag systems for protein-level depletion
Transposon mutagenesis:
Transposon insertion sequencing (TnSeq)
Analysis of insertion patterns relative to gene essentiality models
Conditional essentiality testing under different growth conditions
Targeted gene replacement:
Attempt to create a clean deletion with complementation
Merodiploid approach with second copy before deletion attempt
If deletion is only possible with complementation, this suggests essentiality
Growth kinetics analysis:
Monitor growth rates after protein depletion
Assess survival under different stress conditions
Evaluate recovery potential after temporary depletion
Based on approaches used in other studies, a CRISPRi system would allow for titratable repression of MRA_0013 to determine the threshold levels required for survival and to characterize phenotypes resulting from partial depletion .
Based on research showing that some membrane proteins affect oxidative stress responses, similar approaches could be applied to study MRA_0013's role:
ROS measurement assays:
Dihydroethidium (DHE) or similar dyes to measure total ROS levels
Specific probes for different ROS species (H2O2, superoxide)
Comparison between wild-type and MRA_0013 knockdown strains
Oxidative stress challenge experiments:
Expose strains to H2O2, cumene hydroperoxide, or other oxidants
Assess survival, growth rates, and recovery kinetics
Determine minimum inhibitory concentrations of oxidants
Gene expression analysis:
RNA-seq or qPCR to analyze expression of oxidative stress response genes
Compare transcriptional responses between wild-type and MRA_0013-modified strains
Identify differentially regulated pathways
Protein oxidation assessment:
OxyBlot or mass spectrometry to detect protein carbonylation
Redox proteomics to identify oxidation-sensitive proteins
Thiol oxidation state analysis
Similar to studies of TMEM97 knockdown effects on oxidative stress, comparison of ROS levels between control and MRA_0013-depleted bacteria under basal and stress conditions could reveal protective or sensitizing effects .
| Stress Condition | Measurement Method | Expected Readout |
|---|---|---|
| H2O2 exposure | CFU determination | Survival percentage |
| Superoxide exposure | Fluorescent ROS probes | ROS levels |
| NO exposure | Growth curves | Growth inhibition |
| Macrophage infection | Intracellular bacteria counts | Survival index |
Through these comprehensive approaches, the specific contribution of MRA_0013 to oxidative stress resistance can be elucidated.
When confronted with conflicting results in MRA_0013 research, a systematic troubleshooting approach is essential:
Consider context differences:
Different M. tuberculosis strain backgrounds may show genetic interactions
Growth media composition can significantly alter phenotypes
In vitro versus in vivo settings may yield different results
Environmental conditions (oxygen tension, pH, etc.) may affect outcomes
Methodological validation:
Use multiple independent techniques to assess the same parameter
Include appropriate positive and negative controls for each method
Evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of each assay
Consider whether detection limits or dynamic ranges differ between methods
Genetic complementation:
Ensure phenotypes can be rescued by wild-type gene expression
Use site-directed mutants to pinpoint critical residues
Create point mutations rather than wholesale deletions when possible
Sequence verification:
Confirm the sequence of the MRA_0013 gene in your working strains
Check for suppressor mutations that might arise during manipulation
Verify constructs used for complementation or protein expression
Collaborative validation:
Have key experiments replicated in independent laboratories
Use different methodological approaches to address the same question
Drawing from approaches used in membrane protein research, contradictory findings often reflect the complexity of membrane protein biology and may require multiple complementary techniques to resolve .
Selection of appropriate statistical methods is critical for robust data analysis:
For comparing two experimental groups:
Student's t-test for normally distributed data
Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric data
Paired tests when appropriate (e.g., before/after treatments)
For multiple group comparisons:
One-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc tests (Tukey, Bonferroni)
Two-way ANOVA for experiments with two factors
Kruskal-Wallis test for non-parametric data with multiple groups
For time-course experiments:
Repeated measures ANOVA for normally distributed data
Mixed-effects modeling for complex experimental designs
Area under the curve (AUC) analysis for growth curves
For survival studies:
Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test
Cox proportional hazards models for multivariate analysis
For correlation analyses:
Pearson correlation for linear relationships with normal distribution
Spearman correlation for non-parametric or non-linear relationships
For complex datasets:
Principal component analysis for dimensionality reduction
Cluster analysis to identify patterns
Machine learning approaches for complex data integration
Similar statistical approaches to those used in studies examining the protection conferred by vaccine candidates could be appropriate, such as those used in the rBCG-LTAK63 vaccine research .
Computational methods offer powerful tools for MRA_0013 research across multiple dimensions:
Structural prediction and analysis:
Homology modeling based on related membrane proteins
Ab initio modeling for unique structural elements
Molecular dynamics simulations to study dynamics in a lipid bilayer
Identification of potential binding pockets or functional sites
Functional prediction:
Identification of conserved domains and motifs
Prediction of transmembrane topology
Identification of potential post-translational modification sites
Metabolic pathway integration analysis
Systems biology approaches:
Network analysis to place MRA_0013 in biological context
Integration with transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data
Flux balance analysis to predict metabolic impacts
Gene regulatory network analysis
Evolutionary analysis:
Comparative genomics across mycobacterial species
Selection pressure analysis to identify functionally important regions
Identification of co-evolving proteins that may be functional partners
Horizontal gene transfer assessment
Drug discovery applications:
Virtual screening for potential inhibitors
Binding site analysis and druggability assessment
Pharmacophore modeling for rational drug design
Prediction of resistance-conferring mutations
Similar to computational approaches used for off-target prediction in CRISPRi studies , bioinformatic methods can provide valuable insights while guiding experimental design for MRA_0013 research.
Research on MRA_0013 could impact TB vaccine development through several mechanisms:
As a potential antigen candidate:
If MRA_0013 is surface-exposed, it could serve as an antigen target
Recombinant protein vaccines incorporating MRA_0013 epitopes
DNA vaccines encoding immunogenic regions of MRA_0013
As a genetic adjuvant component:
Similar to the LTAK63 adjuvant approach described in TB vaccine research
Modification of MRA_0013 expression in attenuated vaccine strains
Co-expression with immunostimulatory molecules
As a virulence modulator:
If involved in pathogenesis, attenuation through MRA_0013 modification
Creation of balanced attenuation for safety while maintaining immunogenicity
Development of auxotrophic strains dependent on exogenous factors
For improved immunological memory:
The research on rBCG-LTAK63 vaccine demonstrates how recombinant BCG strains can enhance immune responses and improve protection against M. tuberculosis challenge, suggesting similar approaches could be applied using MRA_0013 modifications .
Potential involvement of MRA_0013 in drug resistance could occur through several mechanisms:
Membrane permeability alterations:
If MRA_0013 affects membrane structure or composition
Could influence drug penetration into the cell
Might alter membrane fluidity or organization
Stress response modulation:
If involved in stress responses similar to roles described for other membrane proteins
Could contribute to bacterial survival during drug exposure
Might activate adaptive responses to antibiotic pressure
Biofilm formation:
If involved in surface properties or cell-cell interactions
Could contribute to biofilm-associated resistance
Might affect cell envelope remodeling during biofilm formation
Signaling pathway involvement:
If part of stress sensing or signaling pathways
Could trigger compensatory mechanisms during drug exposure
Might coordinate multiple resistance mechanisms
Research approaches similar to those used for studying membrane protein roles in stress responses could be adapted to investigate MRA_0013's potential role in drug resistance mechanisms .