Recombinant Mycoplasma gallisepticum tRNA modification GTPase MnmE (mnmE)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we will prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized fulfillment.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice shipping is specifically requested and pre-arranged. Additional fees apply for dry ice shipping.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and serves as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and the protein's inherent stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms maintain stability for 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is determined during production. Please specify your required tag type for preferential development.
Synonyms
mnmE; trmE; MYCGA7190; MGA_0604; tRNA modification GTPase MnmE; EC 3.6.-.-
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-453
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Mycoplasma gallisepticum (strain R(low / passage 15 / clone 2))
Target Names
mnmE
Target Protein Sequence
MINKIMKKYE TIYALATAPY NSAIHVIRLS GPDAFEIINK ICDKQITKEG YRIQNARIVD NDQIIDDVLL MKFVAPKSFT GEDSIEINCH GGLFVINKIM ALLNKHGAHL ARRGEFSKRS YINKKIDLNQ ATAIHDLIFA KNNLSHSASI KALSGEFSKD IKNIQQEIFR LIGLVEIAID YPEYEDEKKE LTEEFKNLTN IRQKLQRIVN KSLKLKQISE GIKIAIVGEP NAGKSSLLNA LLNEQKAIVT NIPGTTRDTV EGQIVLNDEL IINLIDTAGI RKSSDQIEQI GINKSFKTID KSDLVIYLID LNKYQNYDKT NIYKYLINKK KQFVLVGNKV DEVDPTLNTG EIQIKISAKN NDISDLIKYL EETSLAIFND ENKQDSIFQE EWQINLLQTA LYNINLILND PNQYHDLVIQ HLNEANNSLL KVLSEYEDYN LIDEIFKNFC LGK
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This protein displays a high intrinsic GTPase hydrolysis rate. It participates in the addition of a carboxymethylaminomethyl (cmnm) group to the wobble position (U34) of specific tRNAs, resulting in the formation of tRNA-cmnm5s2U34.
Database Links

KEGG: mga:MGA_0604

Protein Families
TRAFAC class TrmE-Era-EngA-EngB-Septin-like GTPase superfamily, TrmE GTPase family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is MnmE and what is its primary function in Mycoplasma gallisepticum?

MnmE (tRNA modification GTPase) is a conserved bacterial protein that functions primarily as a tRNA-modifying enzyme with GTPase activity. In Mycoplasma gallisepticum, MnmE plays a crucial role in bacterial cell growth and pathogenicity. It forms a complex with GidA to create an α2β2 heterotetrameric structure that mediates the addition of a carboxymethyl aminomethyl (cmnm) group at position five of the wobble uridine of tRNA molecules that read codons ending with adenine or guanine . This modification is essential for accurate and efficient protein synthesis, as it directly affects the decoding process during translation . The protein is highly conserved across bacterial and eukaryotic species, indicating its fundamental importance in cellular processes .

What are the optimal conditions for recombinant expression and purification of M. gallisepticum MnmE?

For optimal recombinant expression and purification of M. gallisepticum MnmE:

Expression System:

  • E. coli is the preferred heterologous expression system

  • Expression region typically covers the full-length protein (residues 1-453)

Purification Protocol:

  • Express the protein with an appropriate tag (tag type determined during manufacturing process)

  • Harvest and lyse cells under native conditions

  • Purify using affinity chromatography corresponding to the tag used

  • Assess purity via SDS-PAGE (target purity >85%)

Storage Recommendations:

  • For liquid form: 6 months stability at -20°C/-80°C

  • For lyophilized form: 12 months stability at -20°C/-80°C

  • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles

  • Working aliquots can be stored at 4°C for up to one week

Reconstitution:

  • Briefly centrifuge vial before opening

  • Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL

  • Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) for long-term storage (50% is standard)

What methodological approaches can be used to study MnmE GTPase activity in vitro?

The GTPase activity of MnmE can be studied using several complementary approaches:

1. Colorimetric GTPase Assay:

  • Measure inorganic phosphate (Pi) release using malachite green or similar colorimetric reagents

  • Typical reaction conditions: 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM MgCl₂, 1 mM DTT, 0.1-5 μM MnmE, 50-500 μM GTP

  • Monitor absorbance at 630-650 nm to quantify Pi release

2. HPLC-based Nucleotide Analysis:

  • Separate and quantify GDP and GTP by ion-exchange or reverse-phase HPLC

  • Allows direct measurement of GTP hydrolysis rates

3. Fluorescence-based Assays:

  • Use fluorescently labeled GTP analogs (like mant-GTP)

  • Monitor binding and hydrolysis through changes in fluorescence intensity or anisotropy

4. Coupled Enzymatic Assays:

  • Link GTP hydrolysis to NADH oxidation via pyruvate kinase and lactate dehydrogenase

  • Monitor decrease in absorbance at 340 nm

5. Radiolabeled GTP Assays:

  • Use [γ-³²P]GTP as substrate

  • Measure released radiolabeled Pi through scintillation counting

For all these assays, it's crucial to include appropriate controls (enzyme-free, GTP-free) and to ensure linear reaction kinetics by optimizing enzyme concentration and reaction time.

How can genome engineering tools be applied to study MnmE function in M. gallisepticum?

Recent advances have made it possible to study MnmE function in M. gallisepticum through targeted genome engineering approaches:

RecET-like System Application:
The RecET-like system from Bacillus subtilis has been successfully implemented in M. gallisepticum, enabling precise genomic modifications . This system can be employed to:

  • Generate mnmE gene deletions or insertions to study loss-of-function phenotypes

  • Introduce point mutations to analyze structure-function relationships

  • Add epitope tags for protein localization and interaction studies

Transformation Protocol:

  • Transform M. gallisepticum strains with 20 μg of recombination template DNA

  • Use circular templates (either single-stranded or double-stranded) for optimal efficiency

  • Select transformants on appropriate antibiotic plates (chloramphenicol has shown success)

  • Verify recombination events through PCR screening and sequencing

Marker Removal Using Cre-lox System:
For advanced applications requiring markerless mutants:

  • Introduce loxP sites flanking the selection marker during initial recombination

  • Transform cells with a plasmid expressing Cre recombinase

  • Culture in selective medium (e.g., with gentamicin)

  • Screen for loss of the antibiotic resistance marker

  • Confirm marker removal through PCR and sequencing, leaving only a single loxP scar

This combined approach allows for sophisticated genetic manipulation of mnmE in M. gallisepticum, enabling detailed functional analysis in its native context.

What experimental approaches can elucidate the interaction between MnmE and GidA in M. gallisepticum?

Investigating the MnmE-GidA interaction in M. gallisepticum requires multiple complementary approaches:

Protein-Protein Interaction Assays:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):

    • Express epitope-tagged versions of MnmE and GidA in M. gallisepticum using RecET-like system

    • Perform Co-IP with antibodies against the tags

    • Analyze precipitates by Western blotting and mass spectrometry

  • Bacterial Two-Hybrid Analysis:

    • Clone mnmE and gidA into appropriate bacterial two-hybrid vectors

    • Co-transform into reporter strain and assess interaction through reporter gene activation

  • Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR):

    • Immobilize purified MnmE on sensor chip

    • Flow purified GidA at varying concentrations

    • Determine binding kinetics (kon, koff) and affinity (KD)

Structural Analysis Methods:

  • X-ray Crystallography:

    • Co-crystallize purified MnmE and GidA complex

    • Solve structure to identify interaction interfaces

  • Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry (HDX-MS):

    • Compare deuterium uptake in isolated proteins versus complex

    • Identify protected regions indicating interaction surfaces

Mutagenesis Approaches:

  • Generate point mutations in predicted interface residues using RecET-like system

  • Assess impact on complex formation and enzymatic activity

The α2β2 heterotetrameric structure of the MnmE-GidA complex suggests that understanding this interaction will provide crucial insights into the tRNA modification mechanism in M. gallisepticum.

What is the relationship between MnmE-mediated tRNA modification and translational fidelity in M. gallisepticum?

The relationship between MnmE-mediated tRNA modification and translational fidelity in M. gallisepticum involves several interconnected mechanisms:

Wobble Position Modification:
MnmE, together with GidA, forms an α2β2 heterotetrameric complex that controls the addition of a carboxymethyl aminomethyl (cmnm) group at position five of the wobble uridine in tRNAs that read codons ending with adenine or guanine . This modification:

  • Stabilizes codon-anticodon interactions

  • Enhances discrimination between cognate and near-cognate codons

  • Prevents frameshifting during translation

Impact on Specific Protein Synthesis:
Changes in wobble uridine modification levels affect the synthesis of specific proteins , particularly those with:

  • Skewed codon usage

  • Clusters of codons dependent on modified tRNAs

  • Regulatory functions sensitive to translational pausing

Pleiotropic Phenotypic Effects:
Alterations in translational fidelity due to MnmE deficiency can lead to pleiotropic phenotypes through:

  • Misfolded proteins triggering stress responses

  • Altered stoichiometry of protein complexes

  • Disruption of temporal gene expression patterns

Experimental Approaches to Study This Relationship:

  • Ribosome Profiling:

    • Compare translation efficiency and ribosome pausing sites between wild-type and mnmE mutant strains

    • Identify specific genes affected by loss of tRNA modification

  • Mistranslation Reporter Assays:

    • Use dual luciferase reporters with programmed errors

    • Quantify mistranslation rates in the presence/absence of functional MnmE

  • Mass Spectrometry Analysis of tRNAs:

    • Directly analyze modification status of tRNAs

    • Correlate with translational errors and protein expression changes

Understanding this relationship is crucial for interpreting the broader physiological impacts of MnmE deficiency on M. gallisepticum growth and pathogenicity.

What are the advantages and limitations of the RecET-like system for manipulating mnmE in M. gallisepticum?

The RecET-like system from Bacillus subtilis represents a significant advancement for M. gallisepticum genetic manipulation, but researchers should consider its strengths and limitations:

Advantages:

  • First Efficient Targeted System: The RecET-like system from B. subtilis provides the first effective method for targeted genome engineering in M. gallisepticum, allowing precise genetic modifications previously impossible with random mutagenesis approaches .

  • Multiple Template Formats: The system works with multiple DNA template configurations, with circular templates (both single-stranded and double-stranded) showing the highest efficiency .

  • Combined with Marker Removal: When paired with Cre-lox recombination, this system allows the removal of antibiotic resistance markers, enabling iterative genome engineering without marker limitations .

  • Cross-Species Applicability: The successful implementation of this heterologous recombination system demonstrates its potential for adaptation to other mycoplasma species .

Limitations:

  • Size Constraints: The system is currently limited by the size of the recombined regions, restricting the scope of genetic modifications to relatively small changes .

  • Efficiency Challenges: While functional, transformation efficiency remains relatively low compared to model organisms, with only 18 transformants obtained in optimal conditions .

  • Template Dependency: Double-stranded linear templates showed no successful transformants, limiting the flexibility of template design .

  • Marker Limitations: Some antibiotic resistance markers (e.g., tetM) showed no successful recombinants, suggesting restriction in selectable marker options .

Comparative Efficiency Table:

Template TypeNumber of TransformantsSuccess Rate
ds linear1 clone (0 successful)0%
ds circular4 clones (1 successful)25%
ss linear1 clone (1 successful)100%*
ss circular12 clones (2 successful)16.7%

How can advanced genome engineering methods be applied to study MnmE structure-function relationships in M. gallisepticum?

Advanced genome engineering methods can enable sophisticated structure-function studies of MnmE in M. gallisepticum:

Site-Directed Mutagenesis Using RecET-like System:

The established RecET-like system can be used to introduce specific mutations in the mnmE gene:

  • G-Domain Mutations:

    • Target conserved GTPase motifs (G1-G5)

    • Create mutations affecting GTP binding (e.g., K to A in G1 motif)

    • Generate mutations affecting GTP hydrolysis (e.g., D to N in G3 motif)

  • Dimerization Interface Mutations:

    • Identify and modify residues involved in MnmE homodimerization

    • Assess impact on complex formation with GidA

  • GidA Interaction Surface Mutations:

    • Target residues at the predicted MnmE-GidA interface

    • Evaluate effects on complex formation and enzymatic activity

Domain Swapping and Chimeric Proteins:

For more extensive structural modifications:

  • Land-and-Expand Approach:

    • Use RecET-like system to insert "landing pads" (e.g., loxP sites) flanking mnmE domains

  • Potential Applications:

    • Swap domains between MnmE orthologs from different species

    • Create chimeric proteins to identify species-specific functions

    • Introduce epitope or fluorescent tags for localization studies

Advantages of RAGE for Larger Modifications:

While the RecET-like system is currently limited by the size of recombined regions, the RAGE method has been successfully used in other bacteria for:

  • Introduction of 15 kbp fragments at specific genome loci

  • Replacement of up to 38 kbp of genomic regions with engineered versions

The combination of precise small-scale modifications (RecET) with capacity for larger replacements (RAGE) provides a powerful toolkit for comprehensive structure-function analysis of MnmE in M. gallisepticum.

What are the key research gaps and future directions in understanding M. gallisepticum MnmE function?

Despite recent advances in M. gallisepticum genetic manipulation, several critical research gaps remain in our understanding of MnmE function:

Unresolved Research Questions:

  • Host-Pathogen Interactions: How does MnmE-mediated tRNA modification influence M. gallisepticum adaptation to different avian hosts, particularly during the documented host shift to North American house finches ?

  • Regulatory Networks: What are the regulatory mechanisms controlling mnmE expression in response to environmental stressors and host conditions?

  • Species-Specific Functions: How do M. gallisepticum MnmE functions differ from those in other bacterial pathogens, and what role might these differences play in host specificity?

  • Antibiotic Resistance: Does perturbation of MnmE function affect susceptibility to antibiotics, potentially revealing new therapeutic targets?

Future Research Directions:

  • Comprehensive Phenotypic Analysis: Create and characterize mnmE deletion and point mutant strains using the newly available genetic tools to establish:

    • Growth characteristics in different media and conditions

    • Virulence in avian cell models

    • Transcriptomic and proteomic profiles

  • Structure-Function Studies:

    • Determine the crystal structure of M. gallisepticum MnmE

    • Map species-specific structural features

    • Identify potential inhibitor binding sites

  • Translational Fidelity Analysis:

    • Quantify mistranslation rates in wild-type versus mnmE mutant strains

    • Identify specific mRNAs most affected by translational errors

    • Correlate with phenotypic changes

  • Vaccine Development:

    • Explore attenuated mnmE mutants as potential live vaccine candidates

    • Assess protection against wild-type challenge in appropriate models

The continued development and application of genetic tools for M. gallisepticum will be crucial for addressing these research gaps and advancing our understanding of this important avian pathogen.

How could MnmE be exploited for the development of novel antimicrobial strategies against M. gallisepticum?

MnmE represents a promising target for novel antimicrobial strategies against M. gallisepticum for several reasons:

Target Validation Evidence:

  • Essential Function: Studies in related bacteria suggest MnmE is likely essential for M. gallisepticum growth and pathogenicity .

  • Conserved Structure: The high conservation of MnmE across bacterial species suggests structural constraints that limit resistance-conferring mutations.

  • Unique Bacterial Features: Despite conservation, bacterial MnmE has sufficiently distinctive features from eukaryotic counterparts to allow selective targeting.

Potential Antimicrobial Strategies:

  • Small Molecule Inhibitors:

    • Target the GTPase active site with competitive or allosteric inhibitors

    • Design compounds that disrupt MnmE dimerization

    • Develop molecules that interfere with MnmE-GidA complex formation

  • Peptide-Based Approaches:

    • Design peptides that mimic critical interfaces in the MnmE-GidA complex

    • Create cell-penetrating peptides targeting specific MnmE domains

  • RNA-Based Therapeutics:

    • Develop antisense oligonucleotides targeting mnmE mRNA

    • Use CRISPR-Cas systems to target the mnmE gene directly

Drug Discovery Pipeline:

  • Virtual Screening:

    • Perform in silico docking studies against the MnmE GTPase domain

    • Prioritize compounds that bind critical catalytic or structural residues

  • Biochemical Assays:

    • Develop high-throughput GTPase activity assays

    • Screen compound libraries for inhibition of enzymatic activity

  • Cellular Validation:

    • Test compounds for growth inhibition using genetically manipulated strains

    • Create MnmE overexpression strains to confirm target engagement (target over-expression should increase the MIC)

  • Resistance Analysis:

    • Generate resistant mutants and perform whole-genome sequencing

    • Identify potential resistance mechanisms to inform inhibitor optimization

Translation to Vaccine Development:

The genetic tools now available for M. gallisepticum enable:

  • Creation of attenuated strains through mnmE modification

  • Development of DIVA (Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Animals) vaccines

  • Testing of new vaccine candidates in relevant models

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.