Recombinant Mycoplasma pneumoniae Ribosomal RNA small subunit methyltransferase A (rsmA)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Definition and Biological Role

Recombinant M. pneumoniae RsmA refers to the genetically engineered form of this methyltransferase, produced via heterologous expression systems (e.g., E. coli). It catalyzes the transfer of methyl groups to adenine residues in the 16S rRNA subunit, typically at positions critical for ribosomal assembly and function .

Conserved Domains

  • N-terminal Rossmann-fold domain: Binds S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), the methyl donor .

  • C-terminal α-helical domain: Mediates rRNA substrate recognition and positioning .

Enzymatic Activity

  • Target sites: Methylation of adenine residues (e.g., N⁶-methyladenine) in 16S rRNA, influencing ribosomal subunit maturation and antibiotic binding .

  • Substrate specificity: Requires partially or fully assembled 30S ribosomal subunits for activity, acting as a checkpoint in ribosome biogenesis .

Expression Systems

  • Cloning: The rsmA gene is cloned into plasmids under inducible promoters (e.g., T7 or lac) .

  • Purification: Affinity chromatography (e.g., His-tag) yields enzymatically active protein .

Biotechnological Relevance

  • Antibiotic target: RsmA homologs are implicated in aminoglycoside resistance, making them candidates for inhibitor design .

  • Ribosome assembly studies: Recombinant RsmA enables structural and mechanistic insights into rRNA modification .

Functional Comparison Across Species

OrganismMethylation SiteRole in Ribosome BiogenesisAntibiotic Sensitivity Link
E. coli (KsgA)A1518, A1519Quality control of 30S subunitKasugamycin resistance
S. aureus (RsmA)A1520Ribosomal assemblyStreptomycin sensitivity
M. pneumoniae (RsmA)Inferred A1518rRNA processingMacrolide resistance

Key Enzymatic Parameters

ParameterValue (Homologs)Method of Determination
Optimal pH7.5–8.0 (S. aureus RsmA)Crystallography
Mg²⁺ Requirement10–15 mM (E. coli KsgA)Kinetic assays
Catalytic Rate (kₐₜ)0.06 min⁻¹ (E. coli KsgA)Radioactive methylation assays

Evolutionary and Clinical Significance

  • Phylogenetic conservation: RsmA homologs are ubiquitous in bacteria, with structural similarity to Erm-family methyltransferases involved in macrolide resistance .

  • Drug resistance: Mutations in rsmA or its regulatory regions may influence M. pneumoniae’s response to antibiotics targeting the ribosome .

Open Questions and Future Directions

  • Structural characterization: No crystal structure of M. pneumoniae RsmA exists; homology modeling could clarify substrate binding .

  • Functional validation: Direct assays are needed to confirm methylation sites and ribosome assembly roles in M. pneumoniae .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will preferentially ship the available format, but please specify any format requirements when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary by purchase method and location. Consult local distributors for specifics. Proteins are shipped with blue ice packs by default; request dry ice in advance (extra fees apply).
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer, temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form: 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form: 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing. Please specify your preferred tag type if needed.
Synonyms
rsmA; ksgA; MPN_679; MP163; Ribosomal RNA small subunit methyltransferase A; EC 2.1.1.182; 16S rRNA; adenine(1518)-N(6)/adenine(1519)-N(6))-dimethyltransferase; 16S rRNA dimethyladenosine transferase; 16S rRNA dimethylase; S-adenosylmethionine-6-N'; N'-adenosyl(rRNA) dimethyltransferase
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-263
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Mycoplasma pneumoniae (strain ATCC 29342 / M129)
Target Names
rsmA
Target Protein Sequence
MNSFYPSRKL GQNFTVDQSV IAKTCRLIKS LNPTALIEVG PGKGALTKAL LKLQLPYHGI ELDKRLAEYL LVNEILTEEQ LTIGDALKQN LDQYFPDTIP LLCGNIPYSI SSPLIANFLA SKLQQFVLVC QWEFGQRLVA PVNSPNYSAF GVFCQYHLQI KSVFKIDKVA FKPKPQVDSV LMLLKKKPQV AYEAHFGRFL KQCFHQRRKL LVNNLKQLLP PTLLTNVLQQ QDLAATVRAQ ELTPTQLFRL YLSLKPHLSD GKD
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Specifically dimethylates two adjacent adenosines (A1518 and A1519) in a conserved hairpin loop near the 3'-end of 16S rRNA in the 30S ribosomal subunit. May be critical for 30S subunit biogenesis.
Database Links

KEGG: mpn:MPN679

Protein Families
Class I-like SAM-binding methyltransferase superfamily, rRNA adenine N(6)-methyltransferase family, RsmA subfamily
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is Mycoplasma pneumoniae ribosomal RNA small subunit methyltransferase A (rsmA)?

RsmA (also known as KsgA in some literature) is a highly conserved methyltransferase that modifies specific adenosine residues in the small subunit ribosomal RNA. In Mycoplasma pneumoniae, rsmA plays a crucial role in ribosomal biogenesis and function by catalyzing the dimethylation of two adjacent adenosines in the 3' terminal helix (helix 45) of 16S rRNA. This modification is evolutionarily conserved across bacteria, suggesting its fundamental importance in ribosome assembly and function .

How is rsmA expression regulated during different growth phases of Mycoplasma pneumoniae?

While specific data for M. pneumoniae is limited, studies in related bacteria demonstrate that rsmA (ksgA) shows extreme induction during early exponential growth phase. The expression pattern suggests that rsmA is coexpressed with other genes associated with fast growth, indicating its importance during rapid cell division and protein synthesis. Quantitatively, rsmA mRNA levels can be among the highest of rRNA methyltransferases relative to 16S rRNA levels during early growth phases .

What experimental approaches are used to produce recombinant M. pneumoniae rsmA?

Recombinant M. pneumoniae rsmA is typically produced using standard molecular cloning techniques:

  • The rsmA gene is PCR-amplified from M. pneumoniae genomic DNA

  • The amplified gene is inserted into an expression vector (commonly with a histidine tag)

  • The construct is transformed into an expression host (typically E. coli)

  • Protein expression is induced under optimized conditions

  • The recombinant protein is purified using affinity chromatography

  • Activity is confirmed using methyltransferase assays with 16S rRNA substrates

This approach yields functionally active recombinant rsmA protein suitable for biochemical and structural studies.

How does the phylogenetic distribution of rsmA orthologs inform our understanding of ribosome evolution?

The ubiquitous phylogenetic distribution of rsmA (KsgA) orthologs across all domains of life provides insight into the evolutionary conservation of ribosome assembly mechanisms. Research shows that rsmA orthologs are involved in the assembly of bacterial and eukaryotic cytoplasmic small ribosomal subunits, as well as mitochondrial ribosomes . This conservation suggests that the role of rsmA in quality control of ribosome assembly emerged early in cellular evolution and has been maintained as an essential function.

Comparative analysis of rsmA sequences reveals domains with higher conservation rates, indicating functional constraints on protein evolution. The methyltransferase domain shows particular conservation, while other regions display more variability between species, potentially reflecting adaptations to specific cellular environments or regulatory mechanisms.

What are the methodological considerations for assessing rsmA mutant phenotypes in Mycoplasma pneumoniae?

When assessing rsmA mutant phenotypes in M. pneumoniae, researchers should consider these key methodological approaches:

  • Generation of defined mutants:

    • Transposon mutagenesis libraries can be screened to identify rsmA disruptions

    • PCR verification with gene-specific and transposon-specific primers is essential to confirm insertion location

    • DNA sequencing should be used to map the precise insertion site

  • Growth analysis protocols:

    • Compare growth rates at both optimal (37°C) and stress temperatures (20°C)

    • Monitor growth using both OD measurements and viable counts

    • Assess growth in both rich and defined minimal media to identify condition-specific phenotypes

  • Ribosome assembly assessment:

    • Analyze ribosomal subunit profiles using sucrose density gradient centrifugation at varying magnesium concentrations (1mM and 10mM)

    • Quantify accumulation of ribosome assembly intermediates

    • Examine 16S rRNA processing by Northern blot analysis to detect precursor forms (e.g., 17S rRNA)

  • In vivo virulence testing:

    • Mouse infection models should be used to evaluate virulence

    • Measure bacterial burden in lungs through serial dilution and plating

    • Assess pathological changes through histological lesion scoring

    • Compare cytopathic effects on human airway epithelial cell cultures

How does rsmA activity correlate with antibiotic resistance in clinical M. pneumoniae isolates?

Research on the relationship between rsmA and antibiotic resistance in M. pneumoniae shows complex patterns. Macrolide resistance involving 23S rRNA mutations has been detected across different M. pneumoniae clades . Clonal expansion of macrolide resistance occurs predominantly within subtype 1 strains, particularly in clade T1-2, which exhibits the highest recombination rate and genome diversity .

The connection between rsmA activity and antibiotic resistance mechanisms may be indirect, potentially related to:

Analysis of recombination events in M. pneumoniae genomes has identified a putative recombination block containing 6 genes (MPN366-371), which may contribute to the functional adaptation of the organism . Understanding how rsmA activity varies among resistant isolates could provide insights into adaptation mechanisms.

What experimental approaches most effectively characterize the biochemical properties of recombinant M. pneumoniae rsmA?

To thoroughly characterize recombinant M. pneumoniae rsmA biochemically, researchers should employ the following methodological approaches:

  • Enzyme kinetics assays:

    • Determine substrate specificity using various rRNA substrates

    • Measure methylation rates using S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) as methyl donor

    • Calculate Km and Vmax values under varying pH and temperature conditions

    • Assess the impact of divalent cations (Mg2+, Mn2+) on enzyme activity

  • Binding studies:

    • Quantify rsmA binding to ribosomal subunit assembly intermediates using surface plasmon resonance

    • Determine binding constants for SAM and competitive inhibitors

    • Evaluate cooperative binding effects with other assembly factors

  • Structural analysis:

    • Solve crystal structure of M. pneumoniae rsmA alone and in complex with substrates

    • Compare with structures from other bacterial species to identify unique features

    • Use site-directed mutagenesis to confirm the functional importance of key residues

  • In vitro reconstitution:

    • Develop an in vitro system to study rsmA's role in ribosome assembly

    • Monitor the timing of methylation during the assembly process

    • Identify factors that regulate rsmA's methyltransferase activity

How does genomic context influence rsmA expression and function across different M. pneumoniae strains?

Analysis of M. pneumoniae genome diversity reveals significant strain variation that may affect rsmA expression and function. M. pneumoniae can be divided into distinct clades: T1-1 (mainly ST1), T1-2 (mainly ST3), T1-3 (ST17), T2-1 (mainly ST2), and T2-2 (mainly ST14) . These genomic backgrounds potentially influence rsmA regulation.

The differential expression patterns observed in rRNA methyltransferase genes may extend to strain-specific variations in M. pneumoniae. Based on data from similar systems, researchers should examine:

  • Promoter sequence variations that affect transcription initiation

  • Strain-specific regulatory elements influencing rsmA expression

  • Post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms such as small RNAs

  • Protein-level modifications affecting enzyme activity or stability

Recent research on genome recombination in M. pneumoniae has identified functional characterization of recombined regions that clarify the biological role of recombination events in evolution . This genomic plasticity likely impacts rsmA expression patterns and potentially its enzymatic function across different strains.

What controls should be included when assessing phenotypes of M. pneumoniae rsmA mutants?

When designing experiments to assess M. pneumoniae rsmA mutant phenotypes, the following controls should be implemented:

  • Genetic controls:

    • Wild-type M. pneumoniae strain as primary control

    • Complemented mutant strain (mutant with reintroduced functional rsmA)

    • Alternative methyltransferase mutants to distinguish specific vs. general effects

    • Empty vector control for complementation studies

  • Experimental controls:

    • Multiple independently derived mutants to confirm phenotype consistency

    • Growth under permissive conditions (37°C) and restrictive conditions (20°C)

    • Assessment at multiple time points to capture dynamic changes

    • Media controls to rule out culture condition effects

  • Analysis controls:

    • Normalization standards for qPCR (housekeeping genes)

    • Internal controls for ribosome profiling experiments

    • Standard curves for quantitative assays

    • Statistical analysis including biological and technical replicates

How can researchers accurately measure the methyltransferase activity of recombinant M. pneumoniae rsmA?

Accurate measurement of recombinant M. pneumoniae rsmA methyltransferase activity can be achieved through multiple complementary approaches:

  • Radiolabeling assays:

    • Use 3H-labeled S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) as methyl donor

    • Measure incorporation of radiolabeled methyl groups into rRNA substrate

    • Quantify via scintillation counting after acid precipitation

    • Plot activity curves across enzyme concentrations and time points

  • Mass spectrometry-based detection:

    • Analyze modified nucleosides by LC-MS/MS after enzymatic digestion of rRNA

    • Quantify N6-dimethyladenosine formation at specific positions

    • Compare peak areas to standard curves of synthetic modified nucleosides

    • Achieve detection limits in femtomole range for high sensitivity

  • Colorimetric SAM-dependent methyltransferase assays:

    • Couple SAM-dependent methyl transfer to colorimetric detection

    • Monitor SAH (S-adenosylhomocysteine) production as indicator of activity

    • Develop high-throughput screening compatible formats

  • Fluorescence-based assays:

    • Use fluorescently labeled rRNA substrates

    • Monitor conformational changes upon methylation

    • Develop FRET-based systems to detect enzyme-substrate interactions

The combination of these approaches provides comprehensive characterization of enzymatic activity and allows for cross-validation of results.

What are the key considerations for designing rsmA knockout studies in M. pneumoniae?

When designing rsmA knockout studies in M. pneumoniae, researchers should consider these critical factors:

  • Mutagenesis strategy:

    • Transposon mutagenesis is effective but requires careful screening

    • Target early portions of the gene to ensure complete functional disruption

    • Design PCR confirmation primers that span insertion sites

    • Verify knockout at both DNA and protein levels

  • Phenotypic characterization breadth:

    • Assess growth under multiple conditions (temperature, media, stress)

    • Examine ribosome profiles using sucrose gradient analysis

    • Quantify rRNA processing intermediates by Northern blot

    • Evaluate global effects on translation using proteomics

    • Measure virulence in appropriate cell and animal models

  • Potential compensatory mechanisms:

    • Monitor expression of other methyltransferases that might compensate

    • Consider functional redundancy in the methylation network

    • Examine changes in ribosome composition and modification patterns

  • Conditional systems:

    • Consider conditional knockout systems if rsmA is essential

    • Develop regulated expression systems to study dosage effects

    • Create point mutations to distinguish different functional domains

A comprehensive knockout study should address both molecular phenotypes (ribosome assembly, translation efficiency) and organismal phenotypes (growth, stress tolerance, virulence).

How should researchers interpret conflicting data regarding rsmA's role in ribosome assembly versus translation efficiency?

When faced with conflicting data about rsmA's role in ribosome assembly versus translation efficiency, researchers should systematically analyze the evidence through these approaches:

  • Temporal separation of functions:

    • Determine if effects on assembly precede translation defects

    • Use pulse-chase experiments to track ribosome maturation timing

    • Separate direct effects (assembly) from indirect consequences (translation)

  • Context-dependent effects:

    • Examine conditions where one function predominates (temperature, growth phase)

    • Compare results across different strain backgrounds

    • Assess whether different functional assays measure distinct aspects of rsmA activity

  • Structural analysis:

    • Map methylation sites to ribosome structure to predict functional impacts

    • Determine if methylation affects binding sites for translation factors

    • Analyze how assembly intermediates differ in the presence/absence of methylation

  • Comparative approach:

    • Analyze data from multiple bacterial species for evolutionary patterns

    • Compare with eukaryotic homologs to identify conserved functions

    • Develop integrated models that accommodate seemingly contradictory data

Experimental ApproachAssembly Function EvidenceTranslation Function EvidencePossible Reconciliation
Sucrose gradientsAccumulation of precursorsChanged polysome profilesSequential effects
Growth phenotypesCold-sensitivityAntibiotic resistance changesCondition-specific roles
ProteomicsChanged ribosomal proteinsGlobal translation changesRegulatory networks
In vitro reconstitutionAltered assembly kineticsChanged elongation ratesStructure-function links

What analytical methods best interpret the impact of rsmA mutations on global gene expression in M. pneumoniae?

To effectively interpret the impact of rsmA mutations on global gene expression in M. pneumoniae, researchers should employ these analytical methods:

  • Transcriptome analysis:

    • RNA-seq to capture comprehensive transcriptional changes

    • Differential expression analysis with appropriate statistical thresholds

    • Pathway enrichment analysis to identify affected functional categories

    • Analysis of RNA structural changes that might affect stability

  • Proteome analysis:

    • Quantitative proteomics using iTRAQ or TMT labeling

    • Correlation analysis between transcriptome and proteome changes

    • Identification of post-transcriptional regulation signatures

    • Analysis of protein synthesis rates using pulse-labeling

  • Translatomics:

    • Ribosome profiling to assess translation efficiency per transcript

    • Analysis of ribosome occupancy patterns on specific mRNAs

    • Identification of translational pausing sites

  • Network-based approaches:

    • Construction of gene regulatory networks affected by rsmA mutation

    • Identification of hub genes and master regulators

    • Temporal network analysis to capture dynamic responses

    • Comparison with networks from other bacterial systems

  • Integration with phenotypic data:

    • Correlation of expression changes with specific phenotypes

    • Validation of key genes through targeted mutations

    • Development of predictive models linking molecular and phenotypic changes

These approaches should be applied in both normal growth conditions and under various stresses to capture condition-specific effects of rsmA mutations.

How does the dual role of rsmA in ribosome assembly and methyltransferase activity complicate experimental interpretations?

The dual functionality of rsmA as both a ribosome assembly factor and a methyltransferase creates several experimental interpretation challenges:

  • Separation of functions:

    • Distinguishing phenotypes caused by assembly defects versus lack of methylation

    • Difficulty attributing specific outcomes to either function

    • Potential interdependence between the two functions

  • Design of informative mutants:

    • Need for catalytically inactive mutants that maintain structural integrity

    • Requirement for separation-of-function mutations that affect only one activity

    • Challenges in creating appropriate controls for each function

  • Timing considerations:

    • Determining when assembly function occurs relative to methylation

    • Establishing if one function is prerequisite for the other

    • Tracking the temporal sequence of events during ribosome biogenesis

  • Experimental approach limitations:

    • In vitro systems may not recapitulate the coordination of both functions

    • Genetic knockouts eliminate both functions simultaneously

    • Difficulty in isolating assembly intermediates without disrupting normal processes

Research shows that rsmA (KsgA) binds to small subunit assembly intermediates while its methyltransferase activity is delayed until late assembly stages . This suggests a model where binding occurs first, possibly serving as a checkpoint, followed by methylation as a signal that assembly is complete. Experiments must be designed with this temporal sequence in mind to properly interpret results.

What emerging technologies could advance our understanding of M. pneumoniae rsmA function?

Several cutting-edge technologies show promise for deepening our understanding of M. pneumoniae rsmA function:

  • Cryo-electron microscopy:

    • Visualization of rsmA binding to ribosome assembly intermediates

    • Structural determination of conformational changes upon methylation

    • Time-resolved structural studies of the assembly process

  • Single-molecule techniques:

    • FRET studies to monitor real-time binding and enzymatic activity

    • Optical tweezers to measure binding forces and kinetics

    • Single-molecule tracking in live cells to follow rsmA localization

  • CRISPR-based technologies:

    • CRISPRi for conditional knockdown of rsmA

    • CRISPR-based screens to identify genetic interactions

    • Base editing for introducing precise point mutations

  • Ribosome profiling advancements:

    • Specialized ribosome profiling to detect translation changes

    • Detection of altered translation initiation and elongation rates

    • Identification of codon-specific translation effects

  • Synthetic biology approaches:

    • Orthogonal translation systems to isolate rsmA effects

    • Minimal ribosome designs to test essential functions

    • In vitro reconstitution of complete ribosome assembly pathways

These technologies will enable more precise dissection of rsmA's dual roles in methylation and ribosome assembly, potentially uncovering new therapeutic targets.

How might research on M. pneumoniae rsmA inform development of novel antimicrobial strategies?

Research on M. pneumoniae rsmA could inform novel antimicrobial strategies through several promising approaches:

  • Target validation:

    • Confirmation of rsmA as an essential gene through conditional knockout studies

    • Determination of minimum rsmA activity required for bacterial viability

    • Identification of differences between bacterial and human orthologs

  • Small molecule inhibitor development:

    • Design of competitive inhibitors targeting the SAM-binding pocket

    • Development of allosteric inhibitors affecting conformational changes

    • Discovery of molecules that trap assembly intermediates

  • Combination therapy approaches:

    • Identification of synergistic effects with existing antibiotics

    • Targeting of compensatory pathways activated upon rsmA inhibition

    • Development of dual-targeting compounds affecting multiple methyltransferases

  • Attenuation for vaccine development:

    • Creation of attenuated strains with modified rsmA function

    • Development of live attenuated vaccine candidates

    • Design of strains with temperature-sensitive rsmA variants

  • Diagnostic applications:

    • Development of assays to detect rsmA activity in clinical samples

    • Correlation of rsmA sequence variants with clinical outcomes

    • Use of rsmA activity as a biomarker for antibiotic resistance

The essential nature of proper ribosome assembly and the conservation of rsmA across bacterial species make it a promising target for broad-spectrum antimicrobial development with potentially lower resistance emergence rates.

What computational approaches could better predict the impact of rsmA mutations on M. pneumoniae fitness?

Advanced computational approaches could significantly improve prediction of how rsmA mutations affect M. pneumoniae fitness:

  • Molecular dynamics simulations:

    • Modeling of rsmA-ribosome interactions at atomic resolution

    • Prediction of how mutations alter binding energetics

    • Simulation of conformational changes during catalysis

  • Machine learning approaches:

    • Training models on experimental fitness data from multiple mutations

    • Feature extraction from protein sequences and structures

    • Development of predictive algorithms for mutation effects

  • Systems biology modeling:

    • Flux balance analysis incorporating translation efficiency

    • Whole-cell modeling to predict growth effects of rsmA mutations

    • Metabolic control analysis to identify sensitive nodes

  • Evolutionary algorithms:

    • In silico evolution experiments to predict mutation trajectories

    • Identification of compensatory mutations that restore fitness

    • Analysis of epistatic interactions between rsmA and other genes

  • Network analysis:

    • Construction of gene-gene and protein-protein interaction networks

    • Identification of hub genes affected by rsmA dysfunction

    • Prediction of system-wide effects from localized perturbations

Computational ApproachStrengthsLimitationsApplication to rsmA
Molecular dynamicsAtomic-level detailComputationally intensiveMechanism of methylation
Machine learningPattern recognitionRequires large datasetsFitness impact prediction
Systems biologyWhole-system viewParameter uncertaintyGrowth rate effects
Evolutionary algorithmsAdaptation pathwaysSimplifying assumptionsResistance development
Network analysisIndirect effectsIncomplete networksGlobal expression changes

These computational approaches, when integrated with experimental validation, could accelerate our understanding of rsmA function and guide rational design of antimicrobial strategies.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.