Recombinant Mycoplasma pneumoniae Uncharacterized protein MG449 homolog (MPN_663)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the format in stock. If you have special format requirements, please note them when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary based on purchasing method and location. Consult local distributors for specific delivery times. All proteins are shipped with blue ice packs by default. For dry ice shipping, contact us in advance; extra fees apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute protein in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer ingredients, temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form: 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form: 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you have a specific tag type requirement, please inform us.
Synonyms
MPN_663; K05_orf234; MP179; Uncharacterized protein MG449 homolog
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-234
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Mycoplasma pneumoniae (strain ATCC 29342 / M129)
Target Names
MPN_663
Target Protein Sequence
MRYGFFDISQ DFITIFCPKK TLKNCMFGLI GSRTQATLRQ EKNQNFSFFV NEANEIAGFN FFDIKKSFRR GLISHHFTAG LNYPSLKLVK KISELLNYDL TPLAKKVPFV VCEVISAIPI PNTHLKRCKV NTGSNKSLDV VCGADNVRVG LKTVLVHVGG VLPDGTIIKK AKIAGYDSMG MLCSEKELNL KPKNQGIIEI KSHIKIGKSF LDVYLNNSEK FSAWVSTKKR VTGN
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is Mycoplasma pneumoniae and why is studying its proteins important?

Mycoplasma pneumoniae is a small bacterium belonging to the class Mollicutes that causes mycoplasma pneumonia, a form of atypical bacterial pneumonia. It has a remarkably small genome of approximately 816,394 bp and grows exclusively by parasitizing mammals . Studying M. pneumoniae proteins is crucial because:

  • M. pneumoniae represents one of the smallest self-replicating organisms, making it an ideal model for understanding minimal cellular functions

  • The bacterium causes significant respiratory diseases, including tracheobronchitis and primary atypical pneumonia

  • M. pneumoniae proteins, particularly uncharacterized ones like MPN_663, may play important roles in pathogenesis, cellular function, or immune evasion

  • Understanding these proteins could lead to novel therapeutic targets or diagnostic markers

What expression systems are most suitable for recombinant MPN_663 production?

Based on established protocols for similar Mycoplasma proteins, several expression systems can be employed for MPN_663:

  • E. coli expression systems are most commonly used due to their simplicity, rapid growth, and high protein yields. Similar Mycoplasma proteins have been successfully expressed in E. coli systems

  • Alternative expression systems include yeast, baculovirus, or mammalian cell systems, which might be beneficial if proper folding or post-translational modifications are critical

  • When using E. coli, expression strains like Rosetta 2(DE3) can be particularly useful for mycoplasmal proteins due to their ability to provide rare codons that might be present in Mycoplasma genes

The optimal expression system should be determined experimentally by comparing protein yields, solubility, and functionality across different systems.

What is the significance of the homology between MPN_663 and MG449?

The homology between MPN_663 (from M. pneumoniae) and MG449 (from M. genitalium) suggests evolutionary conservation, which often indicates important functional roles. Consider:

  • Significant sequence similarity between homologous proteins in M. pneumoniae and M. genitalium is common, as evidenced by the 79% identity observed between their RecA proteins

  • Conservation between these minimal organisms suggests that the protein likely serves an essential function

  • Insights about MG449 might be applicable to MPN_663 research and vice versa

  • Functional studies of either protein may reveal common mechanisms used by both Mycoplasma species

  • The homology provides a foundation for comparative genomics studies that might elucidate the protein's function

How can I investigate potential enzymatic activity of uncharacterized MPN_663?

Investigating enzymatic activity of an uncharacterized protein requires a systematic approach:

  • Bioinformatic analysis: Begin with sequence comparison to identify conserved domains or motifs that might suggest enzymatic function

  • Activity screening: Test purified recombinant MPN_663 against a panel of substrates based on:

    • Functions of proteins with similar domains

    • Common enzymatic activities in Mycoplasma (consider that M. pneumoniae has limited enzymatic capacity due to its small genome)

    • General enzymatic assays (hydrolase, transferase, oxidoreductase activities)

  • Cofactor analysis: Test activity in the presence of various cofactors (similar to how RecA proteins from Mycoplasma require specific conditions like ATP and Mg²⁺)

  • Structural biology approaches: Determine if the protein contains active site signatures similar to known enzymes

For example, a similar approach revealed that MPN668 functions as an organic hydroperoxide reductase with activity toward both organic and inorganic hydroperoxides in the presence of reducing agents .

What roles might MPN_663 play in Mycoplasma pneumoniae pathogenesis?

To investigate potential roles in pathogenesis:

  • Expression analysis: Determine if MPN_663 expression changes during infection or under stress conditions, similar to how MPN668 is upregulated in response to oxidative stress

  • Localization studies: Determine if MPN_663 is surface-exposed or secreted, which might suggest interactions with host cells

  • Host-interaction assays: Test if recombinant MPN_663:

    • Binds to host cell components

    • Affects host cell signaling

    • Modulates immune responses

  • Genetic approaches: If possible, create knockdown or knockout strains to evaluate changes in virulence

  • Structural analysis: Identify motifs common to known virulence factors (similar to how P1, P40, and P90 proteins serve as immunogenic adhesion proteins)

Consider that many Mycoplasma proteins with roles in pathogenesis are involved in immune evasion, as seen with the P1, P40, and P90 proteins that display sequence variation to evade host immune responses .

What computational methods are most effective for predicting the function of MPN_663?

For function prediction of uncharacterized proteins, employ a multi-faceted computational approach:

  • Sequence-based methods:

    • BLAST/PSI-BLAST searches against characterized protein databases

    • Multiple sequence alignment with homologs from other species

    • Identification of conserved domains and motifs

  • Structure-based predictions:

    • Homology modeling (as performed for MPN668)

    • Threading algorithms to identify structural similarities

    • Active site prediction based on structural features

  • Systems biology approaches:

    • Gene neighborhood analysis in the M. pneumoniae genome

    • Co-expression pattern analysis

    • Protein-protein interaction network predictions

  • Molecular dynamics simulations:

    • Simulate potential binding of substrates or cofactors

    • Analyze dynamic behavior of predicted active sites (similar to the approach used for MPN668)

Computational MethodApplication to MPN_663Expected Outcome
Homology modelingGenerate 3D structural modelPredicted tertiary structure
Active site predictionIdentify potential functional residuesCatalytic residues, binding pockets
Molecular dynamicsSimulate protein dynamicsConformational flexibility, potential mechanisms
Gene context analysisExamine neighboring genesFunctional associations, operons

What is the optimal strategy for expressing and purifying recombinant MPN_663?

Based on successful approaches with other Mycoplasma proteins:

  • Vector selection:

    • pET series vectors for high-level expression

    • Consider codon optimization if necessary for E. coli expression

    • Verify absence of UGA codons (which encode tryptophan in Mycoplasma but are stop codons in E. coli)

  • Tag selection:

    • His₆ tag for simple purification via immobilized metal affinity chromatography

    • His₆-MBP dual tag if solubility is an issue (MBP enhances solubility)

    • Consider tag position (N or C-terminal) based on predicted structure

  • Expression conditions:

    • Test multiple temperatures (37°C, 30°C, 18°C)

    • Vary IPTG concentrations (0.1-1 mM)

    • Consider auto-induction media for improved yields

  • Purification protocol:

    • Initial capture via affinity chromatography

    • Additional purification via ion exchange or size exclusion chromatography

    • For MPN_663, a similar approach to that used for RecA proteins might be effective: extraction with high-salt buffer followed by heparin Sepharose affinity chromatography

  • Quality control:

    • SDS-PAGE analysis for purity assessment

    • Mass spectrometry for identity confirmation

    • Dynamic light scattering for aggregation analysis

How can I enhance the solubility of recombinant MPN_663?

Enhancing recombinant protein solubility requires systematic optimization:

  • Fusion partners:

    • MBP (maltose-binding protein) tag significantly enhances solubility of many proteins

    • SUMO, GST, or TrxA tags can also improve solubility

    • Consider a side-by-side analysis of His₆ versus His₆-MBP tagged versions to determine optimal solubility enhancement

  • Expression conditions:

    • Lower temperatures (18-25°C) often improve folding and solubility

    • Reduced inducer concentration for slower expression

    • Co-expression with chaperones (GroEL/GroES, DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE)

  • Buffer optimization:

    • Screen different pH conditions

    • Test various salt concentrations

    • Include stabilizing additives (glycerol, arginine, sucrose)

    • Add mild detergents for membrane-associated proteins

  • Refolding strategies:

    • If inclusion bodies form, develop a refolding protocol

    • Gradual dialysis to remove denaturants

    • On-column refolding during purification

What are the critical parameters for functional characterization of MPN_663?

For thorough functional characterization, consider these key parameters:

  • Buffer conditions:

    • pH optimization (RecA proteins from Mycoplasma show pH-dependent activity)

    • Divalent cation requirements (Mg²⁺ dependence is common for many enzymes, including Mycoplasma RecA)

    • Salt concentration effects on activity

  • Cofactor analysis:

    • Test common cofactors (ATP, NAD/NADH, FAD/FADH₂)

    • Reducing agent requirements (as seen with MPN668, which requires DTT)

    • Metal ion requirements

  • Interaction partners:

    • Test for interactions with other Mycoplasma proteins

    • Consider that many proteins function in complexes

    • Single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) strongly supports RecA activity in Mycoplasma

  • Substrate specificity:

    • Design assays based on predicted function

    • Test multiple substrate analogs

    • Determine kinetic parameters (Km, Vmax, kcat)

  • Structure-function relationship:

    • Identify critical residues through site-directed mutagenesis

    • For example, if cysteine residues are present, test their importance as was done for MPN668, where Cys55 and Cys119 were found to be essential for activity

How can I study the structure-function relationship of MPN_663?

To elucidate the structure-function relationship:

  • Site-directed mutagenesis:

    • Target predicted active site residues

    • Focus on conserved amino acids identified through multiple sequence alignments

    • Create alanine scanning mutants of surface-exposed regions

    • Specifically test cysteine residues, which are often important for function (as with MPN668)

  • Domain analysis:

    • Create truncation mutants to identify functional domains

    • Express individual domains to test for independent activity

    • Create chimeric proteins with domains from homologous proteins

  • Structural biology approaches:

    • X-ray crystallography for high-resolution structural determination

    • NMR spectroscopy for solution structure and dynamics

    • Cryo-EM for larger complexes or flexible proteins

    • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to identify flexible regions and binding interfaces

  • Computational analysis:

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to understand protein dynamics

    • Docking studies to predict substrate binding modes

    • Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) calculations for reaction mechanism studies

What are the major challenges in studying uncharacterized Mycoplasma proteins?

Several significant challenges exist in this research area:

  • Limited genetic tools:

    • Difficulty in creating gene knockouts in Mycoplasma

    • Challenges in developing conditional expression systems

    • Limited promoter characterization for controlled expression

  • Protein production issues:

    • Codon usage differences between Mycoplasma and common expression hosts

    • UGA codon encoding tryptophan in Mycoplasma but serving as a stop codon in E. coli

    • Potential toxic effects of Mycoplasma proteins in heterologous hosts

  • Functional assignment:

    • Few characterized homologs to provide functional clues

    • Limited knowledge of Mycoplasma-specific biological processes

    • Multifunctional nature of many proteins in minimal organisms

  • Structural challenges:

    • Difficulty in obtaining well-diffracting crystals

    • Protein stability issues during purification and crystallization

    • Potential requirement for binding partners or substrates for stable conformation

How can contradictory experimental results for MPN_663 be reconciled?

When facing contradictory results:

  • Experimental conditions:

    • Carefully compare buffer compositions across experiments

    • Evaluate the effects of protein tags on activity

    • Consider that Mycoplasma proteins may require specific conditions for activity (pH, salt, cofactors, as seen with RecA)

  • Protein quality assessment:

    • Verify protein folding via circular dichroism

    • Check for aggregation via dynamic light scattering

    • Assess batch-to-batch variability in activity

  • Functional redundancy:

    • Test if other Mycoplasma proteins can perform similar functions

    • Consider partial overlapping activities

    • Evaluate potential moonlighting functions (multiple distinct activities)

  • Methodological validation:

    • Use positive and negative controls for all assays

    • Implement orthogonal methods to confirm findings

    • Consider sensitivity limits of detection methods

  • Biological context:

    • Evaluate if contradictory results might reflect genuine biological regulation

    • Consider post-translational modifications

    • Test activity under different physiological conditions

What emerging technologies could advance our understanding of MPN_663?

Several cutting-edge approaches could significantly advance MPN_663 research:

  • Cryo-EM for structural determination:

    • Enables structure determination without crystallization

    • Particularly useful for flexible proteins or those resistant to crystallization

    • Can resolve different conformational states

  • AlphaFold and other AI-based structure prediction:

    • Increasingly accurate protein structure predictions

    • Provides structural hypotheses to guide experimental work

    • Particularly valuable for proteins with limited structural information

  • CRISPR interference in Mycoplasma:

    • Development of CRISPRi systems adapted for Mycoplasma

    • Enables gene knockdown studies in the native organism

    • Helps understand function in the biological context

  • Single-molecule techniques:

    • FRET to study conformational changes

    • Optical tweezers to study mechanical properties

    • Single-molecule tracking in live cells

  • Proteomics approaches:

    • Proximity labeling to identify interaction partners

    • Thermal proteome profiling to identify ligands

    • Phosphoproteomics to identify signaling pathways

How might MPN_663 research contribute to our understanding of Mycoplasma biology?

This research could provide valuable insights into:

  • Minimal genome functionality:

    • Understanding how organisms with minimal genomes maintain essential functions

    • Identifying novel mechanisms that allow streamlined organisms to survive

    • Contributing to synthetic biology efforts to create minimal cells

  • Host-pathogen interactions:

    • If MPN_663 plays a role in pathogenesis, it could reveal novel virulence mechanisms

    • Understanding how Mycoplasma evades host immunity with limited genetic resources

    • Potential identification of new therapeutic targets

  • Protein moonlighting:

    • Small-genome organisms often evolve proteins with multiple functions

    • MPN_663 characterization might reveal novel multifunctional protein architectures

    • Insights into evolutionary adaptations in genome-reduced organisms

  • Comparative genomics:

    • Understanding the significance of conserved uncharacterized proteins across Mycoplasma species

    • Insights into core functions required for minimal cellular life

    • Evolutionary relationships between different minimal genome bacteria

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.