Recombinant Mycoplasma pneumoniae Uncharacterized protein MPN_107 (MPN_107)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Protein Overview

MPN_107 is a 251-amino-acid protein encoded by the MPN107 gene (UniProt ID: P75562). It is classified as "uncharacterized" due to limited functional studies, though its recombinant form enables structural and immunological investigations. Key features include:

PropertyDescription
Gene NameMPN107 (synonyms: C09_orf251)
Source OrganismMycoplasma pneumoniae (strain M129)
Recombinant ExpressionProduced in Escherichia coli with Tris-based buffer and 50% glycerol .
Molecular Weight~28 kDa (theoretical)
Purity>85% as determined by SDS-PAGE .
ApplicationsWestern blot (WB), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) .

Production and Purification

Recombinant MPN_107 is generated via heterologous expression in E. coli, optimized for high yield and solubility:

ParameterDetail
Expression VectorProprietary plasmid system (unspecified) .
InductionLikely IPTG-induced (common for E. coli systems) .
Purification MethodAffinity chromatography (specific resin undisclosed) .
Storage BufferTris-based buffer with 50% glycerol; pH undisclosed .
ReconstitutionSoluble in deionized water; glycerol recommended for long-term storage .

Challenges and Future Directions

  • Functional Annotation: No experimental data link MPN_107 to specific virulence mechanisms or metabolic pathways.

  • Diagnostic Utility: Requires validation in clinical cohorts to assess sensitivity/specificity as a biomarker .

  • Expression Optimization: Codon usage or mRNA accessibility engineering (e.g., via tools like TIsigner) could enhance yield .

Comparative Analysis with Other M. pneumoniae Proteins

ProteinFunctionRecombinant UseKey Difference from MPN_107
P1 AdhesinHost-cell attachment Vaccine development Well-characterized role in cytadherence.
CARDS ToxinADP-ribosylating exotoxin Pathogenicity studies Direct cytotoxic effects demonstrated.
MPN_373UnknownStructural studies Larger size (204 aa vs. 251 aa) .

References in Current Literature

  • Proteomic Surveys: MPN_107 was detected in M. pneumoniae proteome analyses, confirming its expression during infection .

  • Antibody Production: Recombinant MPN_107 may serve as an immunogen for generating monoclonal antibodies .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the available format, but you can specify your preferred format when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary by purchase method and location. Contact your local distributor for specifics. Proteins are shipped with blue ice packs by default. Request dry ice in advance for an extra fee.
Notes
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Working aliquots are stable at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. The default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer, temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form is generally stable for 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form is generally stable for 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon arrival. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag, please let us know, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
MPN_107; C09_orf251; MP047Uncharacterized protein MPN_107
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-251
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Mycoplasma pneumoniae (strain ATCC 29342 / M129)
Target Names
MPN_107
Target Protein Sequence
MTNQNLQDFL DGVLLKEENL NKITEVSLEK GLPHLLDEGI HNEDNFQIFT SQKIVADMIK MVGVKEMKNV HTTVLEPTSG DGAFTCAILD LRLKNIKKSD SFLKEALTGL STIYSVEIDE ELVWLQRNNL YSIFLAFLKK HGIFNEELSL LVKKILMINV SWGELITETK DNENFVCNYD YFLRNKKTKK KPAKHKHEFP EGLFSNGEGK CKSLFVNWSF ADVINEIAHN SNFYFAKIAK IPGEIIQFQI N
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is MPN_107 and what bioinformatic approaches can predict its potential function?

MPN_107 is an uncharacterized protein encoded in the minimal genome of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, a significant respiratory pathogen causing community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). To predict its function, researchers should implement a systematic bioinformatic workflow:

  • Sequence homology analysis using BLAST against multiple databases

  • Conserved domain identification using InterProScan and CDD

  • Secondary structure prediction using PSIPRED and JPred

  • Tertiary structure modeling using AlphaFold2 or I-TASSER

  • Subcellular localization prediction using PSORTb and SignalP

  • Functional inference from genomic context and gene neighborhood analysis

This multi-faceted approach compensates for the limited homology often observed with mycoplasma proteins due to their rapid evolution and minimal genome.

How should researchers design expression constructs for optimal production of recombinant MPN_107?

Based on recent advances in recombinant protein production, the N-terminal sequence significantly impacts expression levels. A systematic approach should include:

Table 1: N-terminal Optimization Strategies for Enhanced MPN_107 Expression

StrategyMethodologyYield ImprovementApplication Notes
FACS-based selectionRandomized N-terminal libraries with GFP fusionUp to 30-foldHigh-throughput screening via fluorescence sorting
N-terminal tag testingTesting MSKIK sequence and variants4-5 foldMay prevent ribosomal stalling
mRNA structure optimizationMinimizing secondary structures near start codonVariableUses algorithms like TISIGNER to optimize transcription
Codon optimizationAdjusting rare codons while maintaining sequenceVariableParticularly important for first 10-15 codons

The FACS-based selection method represents the most comprehensive approach, as it "allows for high-throughput screening of tens of thousands of cells per second containing target protein variants" and "prioritizes the soluble fraction of produced proteins" .

What expression systems should be considered for producing MPN_107 for structural and functional studies?

Mycoplasma proteins often present unique expression challenges due to codon usage differences and the potential for membrane association. Consider these systems:

Table 2: Comparison of Expression Systems for MPN_107 Production

Expression SystemAdvantagesLimitationsOptimization Approaches
E. coliFast growth, high yield potential, well-establishedPotential inclusion body formationN-terminal optimization via FACS; expression at lower temperatures (16-20°C)
Cell-free systemsAvoids toxicity issues, rapid productionLimited scale, expensiveSupplement with chaperones and membrane mimetics
Insect cellsSuperior folding for complex proteinsHigher cost, longer timelineCodon optimization for insect cells
Mammalian cellsNative-like post-translational modificationsExpensive, complex protocolsUse strong inducible promoters

For MPN_107, E. coli with N-terminal optimization offers a logical starting point, as research indicates "up to 30-fold yield increases for various recombinant proteins" using FACS-based N-terminal optimization .

How can researchers determine if MPN_107 contributes to the pathogenesis of M. pneumoniae infections?

To establish the role of MPN_107 in M. pneumoniae pathogenesis, implement a systematic approach:

  • Gene knockout studies: Generate MPN_107 deletion mutants and assess:

    • Growth kinetics in axenic culture

    • Adherence to respiratory epithelial cells

    • Cytotoxicity in infection models

    • Inflammatory response induction

  • Expression analysis: Determine if MPN_107 expression changes during:

    • Different growth phases

    • Adherence to host cells

    • Exposure to host immune factors

  • Host response characterization: Compare wild-type and MPN_107-deficient strains for their ability to induce:

    • Cytokine profiles, particularly IFN-γ and IL-5, which are elevated in severe M. pneumoniae infections

    • Alterations in CD3+ T cell populations, which show significant decreases in MPP

    • Inflammatory markers like serum ferritin (SF), ESR, and CRP, which are elevated in severe cases

Table 3: Key Immunological Parameters to Monitor When Studying MPN_107's Role in Pathogenesis

ParameterObservation in M. pneumoniae InfectionMethodological Approach
IFN-γSignificantly higher in SMPP vs MMPP ELISA, flow cytometry, qRT-PCR
IL-5Elevated in SMPP group ELISA, multiplex cytokine assays
CD3+ T cellsDecreased in MPP and SMPP Flow cytometry analysis
SF (Serum ferritin)Higher in SMPP vs MMPP Automated chemiluminescence immunoassay
ESR and CRPElevated in SMPP Standard clinical laboratory methods

What protein-protein interaction studies would be most informative for characterizing MPN_107 function?

Uncharacterized proteins often reveal their function through their interaction partners. For MPN_107, consider these methodologies:

  • Proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID): Fuse MPN_107 with a biotin ligase to identify proximal proteins within the bacterial cell.

  • Co-immunoprecipitation with proteomics: Express tagged MPN_107 in M. pneumoniae and identify co-precipitating proteins via mass spectrometry.

  • Yeast two-hybrid screening: Screen against a library of M. pneumoniae proteins to identify direct interactions.

  • Surface plasmon resonance (SPR): Test purified MPN_107 against host proteins to identify potential host-pathogen interactions, particularly with components of the respiratory epithelium.

  • Bacterial two-hybrid system: Particularly useful for membrane proteins if MPN_107 proves to be membrane-associated.

Focus particularly on testing interactions with P1 adhesin, as "M. pneumoniae proliferates in respiratory epithelial cells by binding P1 protein to cilia, stimulates the production of proinflammatory cytokines in airway mucosa, induces cellular inflammatory responses and tissue damage" .

How might MPN_107 contribute to the immune dysregulation observed in M. pneumoniae infections?

M. pneumoniae infections are characterized by specific immune dysregulation patterns that could involve MPN_107:

  • Th1/Th2 imbalance: "The imbalance of Th1/Th2 function after M. pneumoniae infection is an important immunological mechanism of MPP" . Test if recombinant MPN_107:

    • Affects Th1/Th2 differentiation in naive T cell cultures

    • Modulates production of IL-4, IL-5 (Th2) or IFN-γ (Th1) cytokines

    • Influences T cell receptor signaling pathways

  • Macrophage activation: Determine if MPN_107 activates macrophages via:

    • NF-κB pathway activation assays

    • Cytokine production profiling

    • Phagocytic activity measurements

  • Complement interaction: Assess if MPN_107:

    • Binds complement regulators

    • Activates or inhibits complement pathways

    • Protects M. pneumoniae from complement-mediated lysis

Table 4: Experimental Approach to Test MPN_107's Immunomodulatory Activity

Immune ComponentMethodologyReadoutControl Comparison
T cell differentiationCo-culture purified naive T cells with APCs + MPN_107Flow cytometry for Th1/Th2 markersCompare with known Th1/Th2 polarizing factors
Cytokine inductionStimulate PBMCs with purified MPN_107Multiplex cytokine assay for IL-4, IL-5, IFN-γCompare with LPS or other TLR ligands
TLR activationReporter cell lines for TLR2, TLR4, etc.Luciferase or alkaline phosphataseCompare with known TLR ligands
Complement bindingELISA or SPR with purified complement proteinsBinding kineticsCompare with other M. pneumoniae surface proteins

What structural biology approaches are most appropriate for an uncharacterized protein like MPN_107?

Determining the structure of uncharacterized proteins provides crucial insights into function. For MPN_107:

  • X-ray crystallography: The gold standard for high-resolution structural determination, requiring:

    • Large-scale production of soluble, pure protein

    • Crystallization screening (often 1000+ conditions)

    • Data collection at synchrotron facilities

    • Structure solution and refinement

  • Cryo-electron microscopy: Particularly valuable if MPN_107:

    • Forms larger complexes

    • Resists crystallization

    • Contains flexible domains

  • NMR spectroscopy: Useful for smaller domains of MPN_107 to:

    • Study dynamics in solution

    • Identify binding interfaces

    • Characterize intrinsically disordered regions

  • Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS): Provides low-resolution envelope information in solution, complementing other methods.

  • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS): Maps solvent accessibility and can identify conformational changes upon ligand binding.

The N-terminal optimization approach described in the literature can significantly enhance protein yield for structural studies, as it "prioritizes the soluble fraction of produced proteins leading to products more suitable for downstream applications compared to methods relying solely on rational design" .

What optimization strategies should be implemented when MPN_107 shows low expression or solubility?

When encountering expression challenges with MPN_107, implement this systematic optimization workflow:

Table 5: Troubleshooting Strategy for Problematic MPN_107 Expression

ChallengeOptimization ApproachMethodologySuccess Indicators
Low expressionN-terminal sequence optimizationFACS-based library screening with GFP fusion Increased fluorescence signal
Inclusion body formationSolubility tag fusionTest MBP, SUMO, TRX fusionsIncreased soluble fraction on SDS-PAGE
Protein aggregationExpression temperature reductionTest 16°C, 20°C, 25°C induction temperaturesIncreased soluble:insoluble ratio
Toxicity to hostCell-free expressionCommercial kits with supplemented chaperonesDetectable protein production
Poor foldingChaperone co-expressionCo-transform with GroEL/GroES plasmidsIncreased soluble yield

The FACS-based N-terminal optimization approach is particularly powerful as it "allows for high-throughput screening of tens of thousands of cells per second containing target protein variants" and has achieved "up to 30-fold yield increases for various recombinant proteins" .

How can researchers develop a purification protocol for MPN_107 that maximizes both yield and biological activity?

A rational purification strategy for MPN_107 should consider:

  • Initial capture:

    • Affinity chromatography (His-tag, GST, MBP)

    • Optimize buffer conditions (pH, salt, reducing agents)

    • Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation

  • Intermediate purification:

    • Ion exchange chromatography based on predicted pI

    • Hydrophobic interaction chromatography if appropriate

  • Polishing step:

    • Size exclusion chromatography to remove aggregates

    • Buffer optimization for stability and activity

  • Quality control assessments:

    • SDS-PAGE and Western blot for purity

    • Dynamic light scattering for homogeneity

    • Mass spectrometry for intact mass confirmation

    • Circular dichroism for secondary structure verification

For maximum biological activity retention, minimize freeze-thaw cycles and determine optimal storage conditions (buffer composition, glycerol percentage, temperature).

What experimental controls are essential when evaluating MPN_107's contribution to bacterial physiology and pathogenesis?

Table 6: Essential Controls for MPN_107 Functional Studies

Experiment TypeRequired ControlsRationale
Gene knockout studiesComplemented mutant strainConfirms phenotypes are due to MPN_107 loss rather than polar effects
Protein-protein interactionsIrrelevant protein control, binding site mutantsDistinguishes specific from non-specific interactions
Host cell response assaysHeat-inactivated protein, protease-treated proteinConfirms effects require native protein structure
Animal infection modelsSham infection, irrelevant protein controlControls for procedural effects and protein-specific effects
Immune activation studiesEndotoxin removal verification, polymyxin B treatmentEliminates LPS contamination as a confounding factor

When studying potential roles in pathogenesis, researchers should consider the findings that M. pneumoniae infection can lead to "excessive immune reaction in the host" and "imbalance of Th1/Th2 function" , ensuring appropriate controls for each aspect of immune activation.

How can systems biology approaches be applied to understand MPN_107's role in the minimal genome of M. pneumoniae?

Given the minimal genome of M. pneumoniae, systems biology approaches are particularly powerful for understanding MPN_107's context:

  • Transcriptomic analysis: Compare wild-type and MPN_107 knockout strains using RNA-seq to identify:

    • Dysregulated genes suggesting functional pathways

    • Compensation mechanisms activated upon MPN_107 loss

    • Co-regulated genes indicating functional relationships

  • Proteomics: Apply quantitative proteomics to identify:

    • Proteins absent or reduced in MPN_107 knockouts

    • Post-translational modifications dependent on MPN_107

    • Protein complexes disrupted in MPN_107 mutants

  • Metabolomics: Profile metabolite changes to identify:

    • Metabolic pathways affected by MPN_107 deletion

    • Potential substrates or products if MPN_107 has enzymatic activity

  • Network analysis: Integrate multi-omics data to:

    • Position MPN_107 within the bacterial interactome

    • Identify hub proteins connected to MPN_107

    • Predict functional role based on network positioning

These approaches are particularly valuable for uncharacterized proteins in minimal genomes, where traditional approaches might yield limited insights.

What contradictions in experimental data for MPN_107 would suggest complex or context-dependent functionality?

When studying uncharacterized proteins like MPN_107, researchers should watch for these potentially informative contradictions:

  • Growth medium-dependent phenotypes: Different phenotypes in defined versus complex media may indicate metabolic or stress-response roles.

  • Cell type-specific effects: Variable responses across different host cell types may suggest targeted interactions with specific receptors.

  • Inconsistencies between in vitro and in vivo studies: Could indicate requirements for host factors or in vivo environmental conditions.

  • Divergent results between biochemical and genetic approaches: May suggest indirect effects, compensatory mechanisms, or redundant functions.

  • Differences between acute and chronic exposure models: Could indicate adaptation mechanisms or cumulative effects.

When encountering such contradictions, researchers should design experiments to directly test context-dependency rather than dismissing contradictory results.

How should researchers approach the integration of MPN_107 findings with clinical data on M. pneumoniae infections?

To maximize clinical relevance of MPN_107 research:

  • Correlative studies with biomarkers: Determine if MPN_107 expression correlates with established severity markers in M. pneumoniae pneumonia:

    • Serum ferritin (SF), which is "significantly higher in the SMPP group relative to the MMPP group"

    • ESR and CRP, which are also elevated in severe cases

    • Specific cytokine profiles, particularly IL-5 and IFN-γ

  • Patient antibody responses: Assess if patients develop antibodies to MPN_107 during infection and if titers correlate with disease severity or resolution.

  • Strain variation analysis: Compare MPN_107 sequences across clinical isolates to identify variations associated with:

    • Antibiotic resistance

    • Disease severity

    • Extrapulmonary complications

  • Therapeutic targeting evaluation: Test if antibodies or small molecules targeting MPN_107 could:

    • Reduce bacterial adherence

    • Diminish inflammatory responses

    • Enhance antibiotic efficacy

Table 7: Integration Framework for MPN_107 Research with Clinical Parameters

Clinical ParameterLaboratory CorrelationClinical Significance Assessment
Disease severity markersTest if MPN_107 induces SF, ESR, CRP elevation Correlation with SMPP vs MMPP outcomes
Cytokine profilesMeasure IL-5, IFN-γ responses to MPN_107 Association with Th1/Th2 imbalance in patients
T cell populationsAssess if MPN_107 affects CD3+ T cells Connection to observed decreases in patient samples
Extrapulmonary manifestationsTest MPN_107 effect on diverse cell typesLink to "liver function damage, myocardial damage, rash"

How might comparative genomics across Mycoplasma species inform our understanding of MPN_107?

Comparative genomics provides evolutionary context for uncharacterized proteins:

  • Ortholog identification: Search for MPN_107 orthologs across:

    • Other human-adapted mycoplasmas (M. genitalium, M. hominis)

    • Animal mycoplasmas (M. pulmonis, M. gallisepticum)

    • Environmental mycoplasmas

  • Conservation analysis: Identify:

    • Highly conserved regions suggesting functional importance

    • Variable regions suggesting host-adaptation

    • Co-evolution with other genes suggesting functional relationships

  • Synteny examination: Analyze if genomic context is preserved across species.

  • Selection pressure analysis: Calculate dN/dS ratios to identify:

    • Purifying selection (functional constraint)

    • Positive selection (adaptive evolution)

    • Neutral evolution

This approach can reveal whether MPN_107 represents a core mycoplasma function or a specialized adaptation to the human respiratory tract.

What emerging technologies could accelerate characterization of proteins like MPN_107?

Several cutting-edge technologies offer promising approaches for characterizing uncharacterized proteins:

  • Cryo-electron tomography: Visualize proteins in their native cellular context at near-atomic resolution.

  • AlphaFold2 and related AI structure prediction: Generate high-confidence structural models even without close homologs.

  • Single-cell proteomics: Track protein expression heterogeneity within bacterial populations.

  • CRISPR interference in mycoplasmas: Enable precise control of gene expression for functional studies.

  • Proximity labeling techniques: Map protein neighborhoods in living cells.

  • Mass photometry: Analyze protein oligomerization states and complex formation in solution.

  • Microfluidic organ-on-chip models: Test infection dynamics in more physiologically relevant systems.

These technologies expand the experimental toolkit beyond traditional approaches that may have limited success with challenging proteins like MPN_107.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.