Recombinant Neckera crispa Protein psbN (psbN), partial

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our default glycerol concentration is 50% and can be used as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us; we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
psbN; Protein PsbN
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Protein Length
Partial
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Neckera crispa (Moss)
Target Names
psbN
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

This protein may play a role in photosystem I and II biogenesis.

Protein Families
PsbN family
Subcellular Location
Plastid, chloroplast thylakoid membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is psbN and what is its function in bryophytes like Neckera crispa?

The psbN gene encodes a small protein component of photosystem II in the chloroplast of bryophytes, including the moss Neckera crispa. This protein plays a critical role in photosynthetic efficiency and energy transfer within the thylakoid membrane. In bryophytes, which are morphologically simple but chemically complex organisms, photosynthetic proteins like psbN have evolved specific adaptations that enable these plants to survive in diverse ecological niches . The protein functions primarily in the electron transfer chain of photosystem II, contributing to the plant's ability to harvest light energy efficiently even under variable environmental conditions.

Unlike vascular plants, bryophytes like Neckera crispa have a dominant haploid gametophyte stage, which affects how photosynthetic proteins including psbN are regulated and expressed throughout their life cycle . The poikilohydric nature of bryophytes (poor capacity to regulate internal water content) means that proteins involved in photosynthesis must function effectively under fluctuating hydration states, suggesting specialized adaptations in proteins like psbN.

How should researchers approach isolation and purification of native psbN from Neckera crispa tissue?

When isolating native psbN from Neckera crispa tissue, researchers should consider sample preparation methods that preserve protein integrity while maximizing yield. Based on established protocols for bryophyte protein extraction, the following methodological approach is recommended:

  • Sample collection and storage: Fresh frozen samples provide the most original protein composition compared to air-dried or freeze-dried material. As demonstrated in studies with other bryophytes, storage conditions significantly impact protein quality and yield .

  • Cell disruption method: Ultrasound-assisted extraction has been shown to effectively disrupt bryophyte cell walls while maintaining protein integrity. This approach yielded optimal results in comparative studies of bryophyte extraction protocols .

  • Buffer selection: Use a phosphate or Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.2-7.5) containing:

    • 5-10 mM reducing agent (e.g., DTT or β-mercaptoethanol)

    • 1-2 mM EDTA

    • 10% glycerol

    • Protease inhibitor cocktail

  • Membrane protein solubilization: As psbN is a membrane-associated protein, incorporate a gentle non-ionic detergent (0.5-1% n-dodecyl β-D-maltoside) to solubilize the protein while maintaining its native conformation.

  • Purification strategy: Employ a sequential approach using ammonium sulfate precipitation followed by ion exchange chromatography and size exclusion chromatography for optimal separation of the target protein.

What expression systems are most suitable for producing recombinant Neckera crispa psbN?

Selection of an appropriate expression system is critical for producing functional recombinant psbN. Based on protein characteristics and experimental objectives, researchers should consider these methodological options:

Expression system comparison for recombinant psbN production:

Expression SystemAdvantagesLimitationsRecommended Applications
E. coliHigh yield, cost-effective, rapid growthLack of chloroplast-specific chaperones, potential inclusion body formationInitial structural studies, antibody production
Chloroplast-containing algae (e.g., Chlamydomonas)Native-like folding environment, appropriate post-translational modificationsLower yield, more complex cultivationFunctional studies requiring authentic protein activity
Plant-based systems (e.g., Nicotiana benthamiana)Proper membrane insertion, suitable for chloroplast proteinsTime-consuming, variable expressionIn vivo functional studies, protein-protein interaction analysis
Cell-free systemsAvoids toxicity issues, direct incorporation of labeled amino acidsHigher cost, lower yieldStructural studies requiring isotope labeling, proteins toxic to living cells

When choosing an expression system, researchers must balance yield requirements against the need for proper folding and functional activity. For membrane proteins like psbN, incorporation of specific detergents or membrane mimetics during expression and purification is essential for maintaining structural integrity.

How can researchers apply CRISPR technology to study psbN function in bryophytes?

CRISPR technology offers powerful approaches for studying psbN function in bryophytes like Neckera crispa. Based on recent advancements in plant CRISPR systems, researchers can implement the following methodological strategies:

  • Gene knockout studies: Using CRISPR/Cas9 with gRNAs targeting the psbN gene to create null mutations. This approach causes double-stranded DNA breaks in the target sequence, allowing for specific modifications in the bryophyte genome .

  • Transcriptional regulation studies: Employing a nuclease-dead Cas9 (dCas9) fused to transcriptional regulators to modulate psbN expression without altering the gene sequence. This approach has been successfully demonstrated in plants with both activators (CRISPRa) and repressors (CRISPRi) .

  • Targeted repression: Utilizing novel repressors like dCas9-N, which has shown efficient transcriptional repression in both Arabidopsis and cucumber. This approach could effectively downregulate psbN expression to study loss-of-function phenotypes .

  • gRNA design considerations: Design multiple gRNAs targeting different positions of the psbN gene, as the position relative to transcription initiation significantly impacts repression efficiency. Positions close to transcription initiation or elongation sites are most effectively hindered by dCas9-based repressors .

  • Specificity assessment: Confirm target specificity through genome-wide transcriptional analysis (RNA-seq) to validate that only psbN expression is affected, without off-target effects on other genes. This approach has been validated in previous plant CRISPR studies .

When designing such experiments, researchers should consider the gametophyte-dominant life cycle of bryophytes, which may require modifications to standard transformation protocols used for vascular plants.

What methodological approaches can resolve contradictory data in psbN functional studies?

When confronted with contradictory results in psbN functional studies, researchers should implement a systematic troubleshooting approach:

  • Technical variability assessment: Implement technical replicates and standardized positive and negative controls to differentiate between biological phenomena and technical artifacts. Quantify experimental variation using statistical methods appropriate for small proteins like psbN.

  • Multi-platform validation: Confirm findings using orthogonal techniques:

    • Complement in vitro biochemical assays with in vivo functional studies

    • Validate protein-protein interactions using both co-immunoprecipitation and microscopy-based approaches

    • Verify expression changes with both qRT-PCR and protein-level quantification

  • Physiological context consideration: Evaluate psbN function under:

    • Different developmental stages of the bryophyte gametophyte

    • Varying environmental conditions, particularly light intensity and temperature

    • Cold stress conditions, which have been shown to trigger significant lipid and protein compositional changes in bryophytes

  • Comparative analysis with model systems: Benchmark results against psbN function in model organisms such as Physcomitrium patens (formerly Physcomitrella patens), which has established protocols for molecular genetic studies and a sequenced genome .

  • Structural biology integration: Combine functional data with structural information to provide mechanistic explanations for apparently contradictory functional results. This could involve techniques such as cryo-electron microscopy or X-ray crystallography of the recombinant protein.

  • Evolutionary context analysis: Perform phylogenetic comparisons of psbN across bryophyte lineages to identify conserved versus variable regions that might explain functional differences.

What are the optimal methods for analyzing the impact of cold stress on psbN expression and function?

Cold stress significantly affects photosynthetic efficiency in bryophytes, with potential implications for psbN expression and function. Based on established methodologies for studying bryophyte responses to cold stress, researchers should implement the following approach:

  • Controlled environmental conditions: Establish precise temperature control chambers for exposing Neckera crispa samples to defined cold stress conditions. Bryophytes typically show significant molecular responses between 4°C (mild stress) and 0°C (severe stress) .

  • Time-course analysis: Monitor psbN expression changes at multiple time points (1h, 3h, 6h, 12h, 24h, 72h) following cold exposure to capture both rapid signaling events and long-term adaptive responses.

  • Transcriptional profiling: Implement qRT-PCR and RNA-seq analysis to quantify changes in psbN transcript levels. Compare these changes with other photosystem components to determine if psbN regulation is coordinated with other photosynthetic genes .

  • Protein-level analysis: Use western blotting with specific antibodies against recombinant psbN to quantify protein abundance changes. Complement this with proteomics approaches to identify post-translational modifications induced by cold stress.

  • Functional measurements: Correlate molecular changes with photosynthetic efficiency measurements using:

    • Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (Fv/Fm ratio)

    • Oxygen evolution rates

    • Electron transport rate measurements

  • Lipidomic integration: Analyze changes in thylakoid membrane lipid composition concurrent with psbN expression changes, as bryophytes are known to modify membrane lipid composition in response to cold stress .

Research on bryophytes has shown that cold stress typically stimulates accumulation of lipids with longer carbon chains and higher unsaturation levels, which may affect membrane protein function and stability . Understanding these lipid changes provides essential context for interpreting psbN functional changes under cold stress.

How can recombinant psbN be utilized in structural biology studies?

Recombinant psbN offers valuable opportunities for structural characterization of this important photosystem component. Researchers should consider these methodological approaches for structural biology applications:

  • Protein engineering strategies:

    • Incorporate purification tags strategically positioned to minimize functional interference

    • Generate fusion constructs with stabilizing protein partners

    • Design truncated variants that retain core functional domains while improving expression and stability

  • Membrane protein crystallization approaches:

    • Lipidic cubic phase (LCP) crystallization

    • Bicelle-based crystallization

    • Detergent-based vapor diffusion methods optimized for small membrane proteins

  • Solution NMR applications: For partial psbN constructs under 15 kDa, solution NMR can provide valuable structural information if the protein can be effectively solubilized while retaining native-like conformation.

  • Cryo-electron microscopy: While challenging for small proteins like psbN in isolation, cryo-EM can be particularly valuable when studying psbN in the context of larger photosystem assemblies or protein complexes.

  • Structural validation: Complement high-resolution structural data with hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) to verify solution-phase dynamics and accessibility.

  • Comparative homology modeling: Utilize existing structural data from homologous photosystem components in other organisms to generate preliminary structural models of Neckera crispa psbN.

When analyzing structural data, researchers should consider the unique evolutionary context of bryophytes, which represent an early divergent lineage of land plants with distinct adaptations in their photosynthetic apparatus.

What approaches can identify and characterize post-translational modifications of psbN in Neckera crispa?

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) can significantly impact psbN function and regulation. Based on established methodologies for PTM analysis in plant proteins, researchers should implement:

  • Mass spectrometry-based PTM mapping:

    • Employ high-resolution MS (UPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS) with multiple fragmentation methods (CID, ETD, HCD) to comprehensively identify PTMs

    • Perform enrichment strategies for specific modifications (phosphopeptide enrichment, glycopeptide enrichment)

    • Implement label-free quantification to assess PTM stoichiometry under different conditions

  • Site-directed mutagenesis validation:

    • Generate recombinant psbN variants with mutations at putative modification sites

    • Assess functional consequences using in vitro activity assays

    • Compare structural properties of wild-type and mutant proteins

  • Environmental response profiling:

    • Analyze PTM changes in response to different environmental conditions relevant to bryophyte habitats

    • Focus particularly on cold stress responses, which have been shown to trigger significant modifications in bryophyte proteins

    • Correlate PTM changes with functional adaptations under stress conditions

  • PTM enzyme identification:

    • Identify likely enzymes responsible for psbN modifications in Neckera crispa

    • Compare with known modification patterns in model bryophytes like Physcomitrium patens

    • Consider the role of modification enzymes in the evolution of land plant photosynthesis

  • Bioinformatic prediction and conservation analysis:

    • Apply PTM prediction algorithms specifically trained on plant proteins

    • Assess conservation of modification sites across bryophyte lineages

    • Analyze evolutionary patterns of PTM sites to identify functionally critical modifications

How can researchers effectively study protein-protein interactions involving psbN in photosystem assemblies?

Understanding psbN interactions within photosystem complexes requires specialized approaches for membrane protein interaction studies. Researchers should implement:

  • In vivo interaction analysis techniques:

    • Split-fluorescent protein complementation assays adapted for chloroplast-localized proteins

    • Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) microscopy using fluorescently tagged proteins

    • Proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID) adapted for chloroplast membrane proteins

  • Biochemical interaction methods:

    • Blue native PAGE to preserve native protein complexes from isolated thylakoids

    • Chemical crosslinking coupled with mass spectrometry (XL-MS) to capture transient interactions

    • Co-immunoprecipitation using antibodies against recombinant psbN or interacting partners

  • Functional validation of interactions:

    • Mutagenesis of putative interaction interfaces identified through structural studies

    • Competition assays with synthetic peptides corresponding to interaction domains

    • Reconstitution experiments with purified recombinant components

  • Quantitative interaction analysis:

    • Microscale thermophoresis (MST) for measuring binding affinities in membrane-mimetic environments

    • Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) with appropriate membrane protein immobilization strategies

    • Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) adapted for membrane protein interactions

  • Computational prediction and modeling:

    • Molecular docking simulations incorporating membrane environments

    • Coevolutionary analysis to identify correlated mutations suggesting interaction interfaces

    • Molecular dynamics simulations of psbN with putative interaction partners

When analyzing interaction data, researchers should consider the unique photosynthetic adaptations of bryophytes to their ecological niches, which may result in specific interaction patterns not observed in vascular plants.

What statistical methods are most appropriate for analyzing psbN functional data?

  • Experimental design considerations:

    • Power analysis to determine appropriate sample sizes for detecting biologically meaningful effects

    • Nested experimental designs that account for technical and biological variation sources

    • Inclusion of appropriate positive and negative controls to establish baseline performance

  • Statistical approach selection based on data characteristics:

    • For normally distributed continuous data: parametric methods (ANOVA, t-tests)

    • For non-normally distributed data: non-parametric alternatives (Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis)

    • For complex experimental designs with multiple factors: mixed-effects models

  • Multiple testing correction methods:

    • Benjamini-Hochberg procedure for controlling false discovery rate in high-throughput data

    • Bonferroni correction for conservative control of family-wise error rate

    • Sequential analysis approaches for time-series experiments

  • Biological relevance assessment:

    • Establish thresholds for biological significance beyond statistical significance

    • Implement effect size calculations (Cohen's d, fold change) alongside p-values

    • Consider limitations of statistical significance in small sample sizes typical of complex protein experiments

  • Reproducibility enhancement:

    • Pre-registration of analysis plans to prevent p-hacking

    • Implementation of blinding procedures where applicable

    • Transparent reporting of all statistical methods, including software packages and versions

How should researchers interpret changes in psbN expression under different environmental conditions?

Interpreting psbN expression changes requires contextual understanding of bryophyte physiology. Consider the following methodological framework:

  • Multi-level analysis integration:

    • Correlate transcript-level changes with protein abundance measurements

    • Assess functional consequences using photosynthetic performance metrics

    • Evaluate broader physiological responses (growth rate, morphology, stress indicators)

  • Temporal dynamics consideration:

    • Distinguish between immediate stress responses and long-term adaptive changes

    • Analyze recovery patterns following stress removal

    • Identify potential regulatory feedback mechanisms

  • Comparative analysis framework:

    • Compare psbN responses with other photosystem components to identify coordinated or differential regulation

    • Contrast responses between Neckera crispa and model bryophytes like Physcomitrium patens

    • Benchmark against well-characterized vascular plant responses to similar conditions

  • Environmental gradient analysis:

    • Characterize dose-response relationships across stress intensity gradients

    • Identify potential threshold effects in expression changes

    • Assess interaction effects between multiple environmental variables

  • Evolutionary and ecological contextualization:

    • Interpret findings in light of Neckera crispa's natural habitat and ecological adaptations

    • Consider the poikilohydric nature of bryophytes when analyzing water stress responses

    • Evaluate potential adaptive significance of observed expression patterns

Studies of bryophytes have shown that they typically accumulate specific lipids and modify protein expression under cold stress conditions . These adaptations allow bryophytes to maintain cellular function under adverse conditions, and changes in photosynthetic proteins like psbN should be interpreted within this broader physiological context.

What are the best practices for comparing native versus recombinant psbN properties?

When comparing properties of native and recombinant psbN, researchers should implement a systematic validation approach:

  • Structural comparison metrics:

    • Circular dichroism spectroscopy to compare secondary structure composition

    • Intrinsic fluorescence spectroscopy to assess tertiary structure and folding

    • Limited proteolysis patterns to evaluate domain organization and accessibility

    • Mass spectrometry analysis of post-translational modifications present in native versus recombinant forms

  • Functional equivalence assessment:

    • Detailed kinetic parameter comparison for enzymatic activities

    • Binding affinity measurements for interaction partners

    • Stability comparisons under varied pH, temperature, and ionic conditions

    • Incorporation efficiency into reconstituted photosystem complexes

  • Membrane integration analysis:

    • Lipid binding preferences using lipidomic approaches

    • Detergent solubilization profiles

    • Membrane insertion efficiency in artificial membrane systems

    • Lateral mobility measurements in membrane environments

  • Limitations acknowledgment:

    • Clearly document differences in source material (expression system, purification method)

    • Quantify batch-to-batch variation in both native and recombinant preparations

    • Establish quality control metrics to ensure consistent comparison

  • Method-specific artifacts consideration:

    • Account for potential tag interference in recombinant protein

    • Evaluate effects of detergent selection on protein properties

    • Consider the impact of lipid environment differences

By implementing these methodological approaches, researchers can establish the degree of functional equivalence between native and recombinant psbN, validating the use of recombinant protein for downstream applications or identifying critical differences requiring further optimization.

How might emerging technologies advance our understanding of psbN function in bryophyte photosynthesis?

Emerging technologies offer new opportunities for investigating psbN function with unprecedented resolution. Researchers should consider these methodological frontiers:

  • Single-molecule techniques:

    • Implement single-molecule FRET to monitor conformational changes in psbN during photosynthetic processes

    • Apply atomic force microscopy to visualize psbN organization within native thylakoid membranes

    • Utilize optical tweezers to measure mechanical properties of protein-protein interactions involving psbN

  • Advanced genome editing approaches:

    • Extend CRISPR applications with base editors for precise nucleotide modifications without double-strand breaks

    • Apply multiplexed CRISPR systems to simultaneously target psbN and interacting partners

    • Develop optimized genome editing protocols specifically for bryophyte systems

  • In situ structural biology:

    • Employ cryo-electron tomography to visualize psbN in its native membrane environment

    • Implement correlative light and electron microscopy to connect functional and structural data

    • Utilize super-resolution fluorescence microscopy to map psbN distribution in intact chloroplasts

  • Systems biology integration:

    • Develop multi-omics integration approaches combining transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data

    • Implement machine learning algorithms to identify patterns in complex photosynthetic response data

    • Create predictive models of photosystem function incorporating psbN structural and functional parameters

  • Synthetic biology approaches:

    • Design minimal photosynthetic systems with engineered psbN variants

    • Create biosensors based on psbN conformational changes

    • Develop orthogonal photosynthetic components incorporating modified psbN proteins

By leveraging these emerging technologies, researchers can address fundamental questions about psbN function that have remained challenging with conventional approaches, potentially revealing new mechanisms of photosynthetic regulation in early-diverging land plants.

What are the major unresolved questions regarding psbN function in bryophyte photosynthesis?

Despite advances in understanding photosynthetic proteins, several critical questions about psbN in bryophytes remain unresolved:

  • Evolutionary significance questions:

    • How has psbN function diverged between bryophytes and vascular plants?

    • What role did psbN evolution play in the adaptation of early land plants to terrestrial environments?

    • Are there bryophyte-specific features of psbN that contribute to their unique photosynthetic adaptations?

  • Regulatory mechanism uncertainties:

    • How is psbN expression coordinated with other photosystem components?

    • What signaling pathways modulate psbN function under environmental stress?

    • How do post-translational modifications regulate psbN activity in response to changing conditions?

  • Structural-functional relationship gaps:

    • Which specific residues mediate critical interactions with other photosystem components?

    • How does psbN contribute to photosystem assembly and stability?

    • What conformational changes occur in psbN during the photosynthetic reaction cycle?

  • Environmental adaptation questions:

    • How does psbN contribute to the remarkable desiccation tolerance of many bryophytes?

    • What role does psbN play in cold stress adaptation in bryophytes like Neckera crispa?

    • How does psbN function change across the poikilohydric hydration-dehydration cycle typical of bryophytes?

  • Methodological challenges:

    • How can we develop more efficient transformation systems for non-model bryophytes to study psbN in diverse species?

    • What approaches can overcome the challenges of expressing and purifying membrane proteins like psbN while maintaining native structure?

    • How can we better integrate data from different experimental scales to build comprehensive models of psbN function?

Addressing these questions will require interdisciplinary approaches combining molecular techniques, structural biology, biophysics, and evolutionary analysis.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.