Recombinant Neosartorya fumigata Phosphatidylglycerol/phosphatidylinositol transfer protein (npc2)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Phosphatidylglycerol/Phosphatidylinositol Transfer Proteins in Fungi

Phosphatidylglycerol/phosphatidylinositol transfer proteins (PG/PI-TPs) are enzymes that facilitate the transfer of phospholipids between membranes, playing crucial roles in lipid metabolism and membrane trafficking. These proteins are essential for maintaining cellular membrane homeostasis and function.

Protein FunctionRole in Fungal Cells
Lipid TransferFacilitates phospholipid exchange between membranes, contributing to membrane biogenesis and maintenance.
Membrane TraffickingInvolved in vesicle formation and transport, which is vital for cellular processes like endocytosis and exocytosis.

Research Findings on Fungal Lipid Metabolism

Research on fungal lipid metabolism highlights the importance of phospholipid transfer proteins in maintaining cellular integrity. For instance, studies on Aspergillus fumigatus have shown that alterations in lipid metabolism can impact fungal virulence and resistance to environmental stressors .

Recombinant Proteins in Neosartorya fumigata

Neosartorya fumigata, often referred to in the context of Aspergillus fumigatus due to their close relationship, is a fungus from which various recombinant proteins have been produced for research purposes. These include proteins like RODA, involved in conidial surface structure, and GPI11, involved in glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor biosynthesis .

Recombinant ProteinFunctionSpecies
RODAConidial surface protein, involved in stress resistance and conidial morphogenesis.Neosartorya fumigata (Aspergillus fumigatus)
GPI11Glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor biosynthesis protein.Neosartorya fumigata (Aspergillus fumigatus)

References

- Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis in 2019 - ASM Journals
- Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis - ASM Journals
- ELISA Recombinant Neosartorya fumigata Glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor biosynthesis protein 11(gpi11)
- Recombinant Neosartorya Fumigata RODA Protein (19-159 aa), His-B2M-tagged
- A Global and Targeted Proteomic Investigation of Aspergillus fumigatus, Neosartorya fischeri and Aspergillus clavatus genome

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized fulfillment.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and serves as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer components, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its implementation.
Synonyms
npc2; AFUA_2G11340; Phosphatidylglycerol/phosphatidylinositol transfer protein; PG/PI-TP
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
38-175
Protein Length
Full Length of Mature Protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Neosartorya fumigata (strain ATCC MYA-4609 / Af293 / CBS 101355 / FGSC A1100) (Aspergillus fumigatus)
Target Names
Target Protein Sequence
TFP VKGDNPLVYC SDPSGNILQI ESVDLVPNPP LPGQTLSINA SGNLKERVEE GAYVALEVKY GLITLIKQTA DLCEQIKNVD LECPLEKGEM TLTKQVDLPS HIPPGKYNVH ADVYTKDGKK ITCLDAHDIE FKIRP
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

This protein catalyzes the intermembrane transfer of phosphatidylglycerol and phosphatidylinositol.

Database Links
Protein Families
NPC2 family

Q&A

What is the taxonomic relationship between Neosartorya fumigata and Aspergillus fumigatus?

Neosartorya fumigata is the teleomorphic (sexual) form of the ascomycete fungus known in its anamorphic (asexual) state as Aspergillus fumigatus. These fungi belong to Aspergillus section Fumigati, which has been extensively characterized through molecular phylogenetic analyses using β-tubulin, calmodulin, and actin gene sequences . Understanding this taxonomic relationship is crucial when reviewing literature, as research may reference either name depending on when the studies were conducted. The genus Neosartorya includes numerous species that have been distinguished through polyphasic approaches combining morphological characteristics, extrolite production, and molecular sequence data .

What molecular characteristics define Neosartorya fumigata proteins and their recombinant expression?

Recombinant proteins from Neosartorya fumigata typically have distinct molecular characteristics that influence their expression and purification. Based on data from related proteins such as Asp f 2, these proteins often contain:

CharacteristicTypical Range/FeaturesExample (Asp f 2)
Molecular Weight30-60 kDa47.2 kDa
Protein Length250-350 amino acids294 amino acids (17-310aa)
Expression TagsHis, GST, SUMON-terminal 6xHis-SUMO
Host SystemsE. coli, P. pastorisE. coli
Purification MethodAffinity chromatographySDS-PAGE verified
Purity Standard>90%>90%

These characteristics must be considered when designing expression systems for npc2, as they influence protein folding, stability, and functional activity .

How do researchers verify the identity and integrity of recombinant Neosartorya fumigata proteins?

Verification of recombinant protein identity and integrity requires multiple complementary approaches:

  • SDS-PAGE Analysis: Confirms the expected molecular weight and initial purity assessment (>90% purity standard for research applications) .

  • Mass Spectrometry: Peptide mass fingerprinting and LC-MS/MS analysis verify the amino acid sequence and identify any post-translational modifications.

  • Western Blotting: Using specific antibodies confirms protein identity and assesses potential degradation.

  • Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy: Evaluates secondary structure content to ensure proper folding.

  • Functional Assays: Activity-based assays specific to the protein class (e.g., lipid binding assays for npc2) confirm functionality of the recombinant product.

Each of these methods provides complementary information about different aspects of protein quality and should be used in combination rather than relying on any single verification method.

What expression systems are most effective for producing functional Neosartorya fumigata phospholipid transfer proteins?

The choice of expression system significantly impacts the yield, folding, and functionality of recombinant fungal proteins. Based on the available data on Neosartorya fumigata proteins, several systems can be considered:

Expression SystemAdvantagesLimitationsSuitability for npc2
E. coliHigh yield, simple cultivation, cost-effective, established for Neosartorya proteins Limited post-translational modifications, potential inclusion body formationGood for initial characterization; requires optimization of solubility
Pichia pastorisEukaryotic processing, high-density cultivation, secretion possibleLonger development time, glycosylation patterns differ from fungiExcellent for proteins requiring eukaryotic folding machinery
Insect cellsComplex eukaryotic modifications, good folding capacityHigher cost, more complex protocolsSuitable for challenging proteins that fail in simpler systems
Fungal hostsNative-like modifications, potential for high expressionSpecies-specific optimization requiredIdeal for functional studies requiring authentic processing

For Asp f 2, E. coli expression with an N-terminal 6xHis-SUMO tag proved successful , suggesting this might be a reasonable starting point for npc2 expression, while maintaining awareness that phospholipid-binding proteins may have specific folding requirements.

What purification strategies yield the highest purity and activity for lipid-binding proteins from Neosartorya fumigata?

Purification of lipid-binding proteins presents unique challenges due to their hydrophobic binding surfaces. A systematic purification strategy should include:

  • Initial Extraction Optimization: Buffer composition significantly impacts solubility and stability. For lipid-binding proteins, including mild detergents (0.1% Triton X-100 or 1-5 mM CHAPS) often improves extraction without denaturing the protein.

  • Affinity Chromatography: Utilizing expression tags (6xHis-SUMO for Asp f 2) provides high-specificity initial purification.

  • Tag Removal: Proteolytic cleavage of tags using specific proteases (e.g., SUMO protease, TEV protease) followed by reverse affinity chromatography.

  • Polishing Steps: Size exclusion chromatography separates monomeric protein from aggregates and removes remaining contaminants.

  • Activity Verification: Functional assays measuring lipid binding should be performed after each purification step to track activity recovery.

Each purification step should be optimized individually, with conditions adjusted to maintain protein stability and lipid-binding activity.

How can researchers overcome solubility challenges when expressing recombinant Neosartorya phospholipid-binding proteins?

Solubility is a common challenge when expressing recombinant lipid-binding proteins. Several strategies can be employed:

  • Fusion Tag Selection: The N-terminal 6xHis-SUMO tag used for Asp f 2 enhances solubility by promoting proper folding and preventing aggregation.

  • Expression Temperature Optimization: Lowering induction temperature (16-20°C) slows protein synthesis, allowing more time for proper folding.

  • Co-expression with Chaperones: Molecular chaperones like GroEL/GroES can facilitate proper folding of challenging proteins.

  • Domain Engineering: Expressing stable subdomains identified through bioinformatic analysis can improve solubility while maintaining function.

  • Solubility-Enhancing Additives: Including glycerol (5-10%), arginine (50-100 mM), or specific detergents in purification buffers can significantly enhance solubility.

Methodical testing of these approaches, potentially using parallel small-scale expressions with different conditions, allows efficient identification of optimal expression parameters.

What methodologies are most reliable for assessing phospholipid binding by recombinant npc2?

Reliable characterization of phospholipid binding by npc2 requires multiple complementary methodologies:

Assay MethodPrincipleAdvantagesLimitationsData Output
Fluorescence AnisotropyMeasures changes in tumbling rate of fluorescent lipids upon protein bindingReal-time binding kinetics, solution-basedRequires fluorescent lipid analogsBinding constants (Kd), kinetics
Surface Plasmon ResonanceDetects mass changes at sensor surface when protein binds immobilized lipidsLabel-free detection, association/dissociation ratesSurface effects may influence bindingkon, koff, Kd values
Isothermal Titration CalorimetryMeasures heat released/absorbed during bindingProvides complete thermodynamic profileRequires significant protein amountsΔH, ΔS, ΔG, Kd, stoichiometry
Membrane Flotation AssaysProtein co-migration with liposomes during centrifugationUses native lipids, physiologically relevantQualitative rather than quantitativeBinding to specific lipid compositions
FRET-based Transfer AssaysMeasures lipid transfer between donor/acceptor vesiclesDirect measurement of transfer activityComplex setup, multiple variablesTransfer rates, substrate specificity

Combining at least three of these methodologies provides robust characterization of npc2's phospholipid binding and transfer properties, while mitigating the limitations of any single approach.

How should researchers design experiments to investigate the physiological role of npc2 in Neosartorya fumigata?

Investigating the physiological role of npc2 requires a multi-faceted experimental approach:

  • Gene Deletion/Knockdown Studies: Creating npc2-deficient strains allows assessment of phenotypic changes in growth, morphology, stress resistance, and pathogenicity.

  • Localization Analysis: Fluorescent protein tagging (GFP/mCherry fusions) enables visualization of npc2 subcellular distribution, providing insights into potential functional sites.

  • Interactome Mapping: Affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry identifies protein interaction partners, placing npc2 within cellular networks.

  • Lipidome Analysis: Comparative lipidomics between wild-type and npc2-deficient strains reveals alterations in membrane composition and lipid distribution.

  • Transcriptional Response: RNA-Seq analysis under various stress conditions identifies regulatory relationships and compensatory mechanisms.

This systematic approach progressively builds understanding from molecular interactions to cellular and organismal functions, providing comprehensive insights into npc2's physiological roles.

What are the critical considerations when designing lipid transfer assays for npc2 characterization?

Lipid transfer assays require careful design considerations to generate reliable data:

  • Donor/Acceptor System Selection: Designing appropriate vesicle systems with compositions mimicking relevant fungal membranes increases physiological relevance.

  • Signal Detection Method: FRET-based assays using appropriate fluorophore pairs (NBD/rhodamine, dansyl/tryptophan) must be calibrated to ensure signal changes specifically reflect transfer events.

  • Kinetic Parameter Measurement: Initial rate measurements under varying protein concentrations enable determination of catalytic efficiency (kcat/KM) for different phospholipid substrates.

  • Competition Experiments: Including unlabeled lipids at varying concentrations reveals substrate preferences and potential regulatory mechanisms.

  • Environmental Factors: Systematically testing the effects of pH, ionic strength, and temperature provides insights into optimal activity conditions and stability.

Proper controls, including heat-inactivated protein and non-functional mutants, are essential for distinguishing protein-mediated transfer from spontaneous exchange between membranes.

How can researchers leverage structural information about npc2 to understand mechanistic aspects of phospholipid transfer?

Structural characterization of npc2 provides critical insights into its molecular mechanism:

  • Crystallography/NMR Approaches: High-resolution structural determination reveals lipid-binding pockets and conformational changes associated with lipid binding.

  • Molecular Dynamics Simulations: Computational modeling of npc2-lipid interactions predicts transient states during the transfer process and energetic barriers.

  • Structure-Guided Mutagenesis: Targeted mutations of predicted binding site residues followed by functional assays verify mechanistic hypotheses.

  • Comparative Structural Analysis: Comparing npc2 with homologous proteins from related fungi identifies conserved structural features versus species-specific adaptations.

  • Time-Resolved Structural Studies: Techniques like hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry track conformational dynamics during the lipid transfer cycle.

These approaches collectively build a mechanistic model of how npc2 extracts, shields, and delivers phospholipids between membranes, informing both basic understanding and potential inhibitor design.

What experimental approaches can determine whether npc2 contributes to Neosartorya fumigata pathogenesis?

Investigating npc2's role in pathogenesis requires multiple complementary approaches:

  • Virulence Assessment: Comparing infection outcomes between wild-type and npc2-deficient strains in appropriate in vivo models.

  • Host Cell Interaction Studies: Examining adhesion, invasion, and survival within host cells and tissues.

  • Stress Resistance Profiling: Measuring growth under conditions mimicking host environments (oxidative stress, nutrient limitation, immune factors).

  • Transcriptional Adaptation: RNA-Seq analysis during host interaction identifies whether npc2 is differentially regulated during infection.

  • Immunological Recognition: Determining whether npc2 serves as an antigen recognized by host immune systems.

These approaches collectively determine whether npc2 functions as a virulence factor, survival factor, or has no significant role in pathogenesis, informing its potential as a therapeutic target.

How can comparative analysis of npc2 across fungal species provide evolutionary insights?

Comparative analysis of npc2 across fungal species reveals evolutionary patterns and functional constraints:

  • Phylogenetic Analysis: Reconstructing evolutionary relationships based on sequence alignments places selective pressures in context.

  • Selection Pressure Analysis: Calculating dN/dS ratios identifies regions under purifying or diversifying selection.

  • Structure-Function Correlation: Mapping conserved regions onto structural models identifies functionally critical domains.

  • Horizontal Gene Transfer Assessment: Analyzing sequence similarities and gene synteny detects potential horizontal acquisition events.

  • Functional Complementation: Testing whether npc2 from different species can functionally substitute for each other in vivo.

The evolution of lipid transfer proteins like npc2 likely reflects adaptation to specific membrane compositions and environmental challenges, providing insights into both fundamental biology and potential species-specific vulnerability to therapeutic intervention.

What are the major technical challenges in working with recombinant phospholipid transfer proteins and how can they be addressed?

Working with phospholipid transfer proteins presents several technical challenges:

ChallengeSolution ApproachImplementation Details
Maintaining native conformationBuffer optimizationInclude stabilizers like glycerol (10%), appropriate detergents below CMC, and reducing agents
Preventing lipid co-purificationLipid stripping protocolsIncorporate hydrophobic resin (e.g., C8-coupled) wash steps during purification
Assessing lipid-free stateAnalytical techniquesUse thin-layer chromatography of extracted lipids or mass spectrometry to verify lipid content
Measuring transfer kineticsStopped-flow spectroscopyEnables measurement of rapid transfer events on millisecond timescales
Distinguishing transfer from membrane fusionMembrane integrity assaysInclude calcein release assays to verify membrane integrity during transfer events

Systematic optimization addressing each challenge sequentially improves the reliability and reproducibility of experiments with npc2 and related phospholipid transfer proteins.

How can researchers design meaningful structure-function studies of npc2?

Effective structure-function studies of npc2 require systematic experimental design:

  • Homology Modeling: In the absence of crystallographic data, models based on related proteins provide initial structural hypotheses.

  • Conserved Domain Mapping: Bioinformatic identification of highly conserved regions across fungal npc2 homologs highlights potentially critical functional elements.

  • Rational Mutagenesis Strategy: Creating a panel of mutations targeting predicted binding sites, transfer pathways, and membrane interaction surfaces.

  • Functional Readouts: Developing quantitative assays for each function (binding affinity, transfer rates, membrane association) enables comprehensive phenotyping.

  • Correlation Analysis: Statistical correlation between structural changes and functional impacts identifies structure-function relationships.

This approach progressively builds understanding of how specific structural features contribute to various aspects of npc2 function, potentially identifying minimally required elements for activity.

What considerations are important when comparing in vitro findings about npc2 to its function in living fungal cells?

Bridging in vitro characterization with in vivo function requires careful experimental design:

  • Physiological Relevance of Conditions: In vitro experiments should utilize lipid compositions, pH, and ionic conditions that mimic the fungal cellular environment.

  • Concentration Scaling: Accounting for differences between in vitro protein concentrations and estimated cellular levels through dilution series experiments.

  • Validation Approaches: Complementation studies with structure-guided mutants verify whether in vitro functional defects manifest as corresponding cellular phenotypes.

  • Context Dependencies: Systematic testing for cellular factors that may modulate activity but are absent in reconstituted systems.

  • Temporal Considerations: Developing time-resolved imaging approaches to track dynamics in living cells for comparison with in vitro kinetics.

These considerations help researchers avoid over-interpretation of in vitro findings while enabling meaningful translation between reconstituted systems and cellular contexts.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2024 Thebiotek. All Rights Reserved.