Recombinant Neosartorya fumigata Protein sym1 (sym1) is a recombinant protein derived from the species Neosartorya fumigata, which is often associated with Aspergillus fumigatus. This protein is produced through recombinant DNA technology, allowing for its expression in a controlled environment. The sym1 protein is identified by the Uniprot accession number Q4WDZ0 and is associated with the gene name sym1 and the ORF name AFUA_5G01170.
Species: Neosartorya fumigata (strain ATCC MYA-4609 / Af293 / CBS 101355 / FGSC A1100), commonly linked to Aspergillus fumigatus.
Uniprot Accession Number: Q4WDZ0.
Gene Name: sym1.
ORF Name: AFUA_5G01170.
Expression Region: The protein is expressed from amino acids 1 to 196.
Amino Acid Sequence: The sequence begins with MFQWYQRSLIQRPLLTQSLTTACLFAVGDSLAQQAVEKRGIAQHDVARTGRMAFYGGGNV QPFPYKLPLLTVVAVFGPLATKWFQVLQRRINLPSAQRTVVGRVAADQLLFAPTMIGVFL SSMSVLEGGSLSEKLERSYWPALKANWTVWPFLQLVNFALVPLQFRVLTVNVLNIGWNCF LSLSNNVGSQDVPLVA.
Storage Conditions: The protein is stored in a Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol at -20°C or -80°C. Repeated freezing and thawing should be avoided.
The Recombinant Neosartorya fumigata Protein sym1 (sym1) is available in quantities of 50 µg, with options for other quantities upon request. The tag type used in the production process may vary.
| Protein | Species | Function | Expression System | Tag |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sym1 | Neosartorya fumigata | Unknown specific function | Not specified | Not specified |
| ASPF3 | Neosartorya fumigata | Thiol-specific peroxidase, involved in oxidative stress response | E. coli | N-6His-SUMO |
KEGG: afm:AFUA_5G01170
Protein sym1 is a 196-amino acid protein encoded by the sym1 gene (ORF name: AFUA_5G01170) in Neosartorya fumigata (also known as Aspergillus fumigatus), a clinically significant fungal pathogen. The protein is referenced in UniProt database with ID Q4WDZ0 . This protein is present in several A. fumigatus strains, including the reference strain ATCC MYA-4609 / Af293 / CBS 101355 / FGSC A1100. While the precise biological function of sym1 has not been fully characterized, ongoing research suggests potential roles in fungal cell wall organization and potential involvement in stress response pathways, similar to other proteins identified in A. fumigatus.
The most commonly documented expression system for recombinant sym1 production is Escherichia coli. Commercial preparations typically use E. coli expression systems with fusion tags to facilitate purification and potentially enhance solubility . The full-length protein (amino acids 1-196) is expressed with various tags, with His-tags being commonly used in research-grade preparations. Expression in eukaryotic systems has been less well documented in available literature, though yeast expression systems might provide advantages for studying proteins from fungal origins.
Recombinant sym1 protein requires careful storage to maintain stability and activity. According to product specifications:
| Storage Parameter | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Long-term storage | -20°C to -80°C |
| Working aliquots | 4°C for up to one week |
| Formulation | Typically in Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol or Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% Trehalose, pH 8.0 |
| Important considerations | Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles |
For extended storage, aliquoting the protein and storing at -80°C is recommended to prevent degradation from repeated freeze-thaw cycles .
For lyophilized preparations of recombinant sym1:
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to bring contents to the bottom
Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to achieve a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
For storage of reconstituted protein, add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (typically 50% is recommended)
Aliquot into smaller working volumes to minimize freeze-thaw cycles
Store reconstituted aliquots at -20°C for medium-term use or -80°C for long-term storage
Multiple analytical techniques can be employed to confirm the identity and purity of sym1 preparations:
SDS-PAGE analysis: Commercial preparations are typically >90% pure as determined by SDS-PAGE. When running your own analysis, a single prominent band at approximately 22 kDa (for the untagged protein) or slightly higher (for tagged versions) should be visible .
Western blotting: Using antibodies against the protein itself or fusion tags (e.g., anti-His antibodies for His-tagged versions).
Mass spectrometry: For definitive identification and to verify the correct sequence and potential post-translational modifications.
Size exclusion chromatography: To assess protein aggregation status and homogeneity.
Circular dichroism: To evaluate whether the recombinant protein has properly folded secondary structure elements.
Recombinant sym1 protein can be utilized in various experimental contexts:
Immunological studies: As an antigen for antibody production or in ELISA-based detection systems .
Protein-protein interaction studies: Pull-down assays, co-immunoprecipitation, or yeast two-hybrid screening to identify binding partners.
Structural biology: X-ray crystallography or NMR studies to determine three-dimensional structure.
Functional assays: Based on hypothesized functions in cell wall integrity or stress response pathways.
Biomarker development: Potentially as a diagnostic biomarker for Aspergillus infections, though this requires further validation.
While direct evidence for sym1's role in A. fumigatus pathogenicity is not explicitly documented in the provided search results, researchers can investigate its potential role by considering:
Cell wall integrity pathways: Research on A. fumigatus has shown that cell wall components and their regulation are critical for virulence. If sym1 participates in cell wall maintenance (as suggested by its sequence characteristics), it may influence interactions with host immune cells .
Secondary metabolite production: A. fumigatus produces numerous secondary metabolites that contribute to virulence, including fumagillin, pyripyropene, fumigaclavine C, and others. Research could investigate whether sym1 influences metabolite production pathways .
Immune response modulation: Studies could examine whether sym1 affects phagocytosis rates and killing by macrophages, similar to experiments conducted with other A. fumigatus proteins .
Comparative analysis: Examining sym1 expression levels in virulent versus attenuated strains could provide insights into its potential role in pathogenicity.
Based on research approaches used for other A. fumigatus proteins, several methodologies could be applied to study sym1's role in cell wall integrity:
Gene deletion studies: Creating Δsym1 knockout strains and analyzing phenotypes related to cell wall stress resistance.
Cell wall composition analysis: Comparing cell wall components (β-glucans, chitin, mannoproteins) between wild-type and sym1-modified strains.
Cell wall stress assays: Exposing wild-type and sym1-manipulated strains to cell wall stressors like Congo Red (CR) and Calcofluor White (CFW) to assess sensitivity differences .
Protein localization: Using fluorescently tagged sym1 to determine if it localizes to the cell wall or related structures.
Transcriptional profiling: Analyzing how sym1 deletion or overexpression affects the transcription of known cell wall integrity genes.
To investigate sym1's role in signaling cascades:
MAPK pathway analysis: Assess phosphorylation states of MpkA and MpkB (MAP kinases involved in cell wall integrity and secondary metabolism) in sym1-modified strains, similar to analyses performed for GprM and GprJ .
PKA signaling investigation: Examine PKA activity levels in sym1 mutants, as PKA has been shown to be involved in cell wall maintenance and melanin production in A. fumigatus .
Protein-protein interaction studies: Use techniques like co-immunoprecipitation or yeast two-hybrid assays to identify proteins that physically interact with sym1.
Transcription factor screening: Identify transcription factors whose activity is altered in sym1 mutants, potentially using approaches similar to those employed in studies of GprM downstream effectors .
Proper experimental design with appropriate controls is essential:
| Control Type | Purpose | Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Negative control | Establish baseline/background | Buffer-only or irrelevant protein of similar size and properties |
| Positive control | Validate assay functionality | Well-characterized protein with known activity in your assay system |
| Tag-only control | Account for tag effects | Express and purify tag portion alone |
| Denatured protein control | Differentiate specific vs. non-specific effects | Heat-denatured sym1 protein |
| Concentration gradient | Establish dose-response relationships | Serial dilutions of sym1 protein |
Researchers frequently encounter several challenges when working with fungal proteins:
Solubility issues: Fungal proteins may form inclusion bodies in bacterial expression systems. Solutions include:
Optimizing expression conditions (temperature, induction timing, media composition)
Using solubility-enhancing tags like SUMO, MBP, or GST
Exploring fungal or mammalian expression systems for problematic proteins
Post-translational modifications: Bacterial systems lack eukaryotic PTM machinery. Consider:
Using yeast or insect cell expression systems when PTMs are critical
Analyzing native sym1 from A. fumigatus to identify important modifications
Structural integrity verification: Ensuring proper folding through:
Circular dichroism spectroscopy
Limited proteolysis assays
Activity-based functional assays
Protein degradation: Preventing proteolysis through:
Addition of protease inhibitors
Optimizing buffer conditions (pH, salt concentration)
Maintaining cold chain throughout purification