Recombinant Neosartorya fumigata WD repeat-containing protein jip5 (jip5)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
jip5; AFUA_6G07080; WD repeat-containing protein jip5
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-416
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Neosartorya fumigata (strain ATCC MYA-4609 / Af293 / CBS 101355 / FGSC A1100) (Aspergillus fumigatus)
Target Names
jip5
Target Protein Sequence
MFDTVCTLPL SADLFSQALH PKEPIVSVGL STGHVQTFRL PSEESDTDND GAESTSSSRN GKGHIDTMWR TRRHKGSCRC LGFGVDGEML YSAGTDGLVK AAKAETGVVE NKIAIPPAKD GSVDAPTIVH ALSPQTLLLA TDSSALHLYD LRIPFSPVSA RPQQTHHPHD DYISSLTPLP PSDTSTSGFS KQWVTTGGTT LAVTDLRRGV LVRSEDQEEE LVSSVYIGGL RAGGTSRGEK VIVGGSSGVL TLWEKGAWDD QDERIYVQRE AGGGESLETL AVVPDELGKG KMIAVGLGSG GVKFVRMGVN KVVSEVMHDE TEGVIGLGFD VEGRMVSGGG QIVKVWHEAV DSDEMDGDTI GGKRMFGSGS DSDDSDDGDD SDDSDRGSRK AAQPQRKKRK NKGKGGQDIM GFADID
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links
Protein Families
WD repeat WDR55 family
Subcellular Location
Nucleus, nucleolus.

Q&A

What is the basic structure and function of WD repeat-containing proteins in fungal species?

WD repeat-containing proteins represent a functionally diverse family characterized by repeating units that typically end with tryptophan-aspartic acid (WD) dipeptides. In fungal species like Neosartorya fumigata, these proteins commonly form beta-propeller structures that serve as platforms for protein-protein interactions. The structural arrangement creates multiple stable interaction surfaces that facilitate complex formation with various binding partners simultaneously.

Similar to WDR5 in viral systems, fungal WD repeat-containing proteins likely function as scaffolding proteins that coordinate molecular interactions in various cellular processes . These proteins may be involved in critical functions including signal transduction, cytoskeletal organization, and stress response mechanisms, though specific functions vary depending on the particular WD repeat protein.

How do WD repeat-containing proteins differ from other structural proteins in Neosartorya fumigata?

Unlike structural proteins such as RODA (which forms interwoven fascicules of clustered proteinaceous microfibrils in the cell wall), WD repeat-containing proteins primarily function in protein-protein interactions rather than providing direct structural support . While RODA contributes to conidial hydrophobicity and resistance to environmental stress through its physical properties, WD repeat proteins typically mediate cellular processes through their role as molecular adaptors.

The key distinction lies in their molecular architecture: RODA proteins create physical structures that contribute directly to cellular morphology and integrity, whereas WD repeat proteins create interaction hubs that regulate cellular processes through protein assembly and signaling coordination. This functional difference is reflected in their localization patterns, with RODA being primarily cell wall-associated while WD repeat proteins are often found throughout cellular compartments.

What are the optimal expression systems for producing recombinant Neosartorya fumigata jip5 protein?

Based on approaches used for similar fungal proteins, E. coli expression systems represent a commonly utilized platform for recombinant production of Neosartorya fumigata proteins . When designing expression constructs for jip5, researchers should consider:

  • Codon optimization for the selected expression host

  • Inclusion of appropriate purification tags (His-tag or His-B2M tag systems have been successful with other N. fumigata proteins)

  • Expression of specific domains versus full-length protein based on research objectives

  • Selection of suitable buffer systems to maintain protein stability

For optimal yield and stability, expression in E. coli often requires optimization of induction conditions (temperature, IPTG concentration, and induction duration). Tris-based buffer systems with glycerol have proven effective for maintaining stability of other N. fumigata recombinant proteins .

What experimental design approaches are most suitable for studying jip5 protein interactions?

When investigating protein-protein interactions involving jip5, a systematic experimental design approach should be implemented. Based on established methodologies for WD repeat proteins, consider the following experimental design framework:

Experimental ApproachApplication to jip5 ResearchKey Controls
Co-immunoprecipitationIdentification of native interaction partnersIgG controls, non-specific protein controls
Yeast two-hybrid screeningSystematic identification of potential binding partnersAutoactivation controls, validation with alternative methods
Pull-down assaysValidation of direct interactionsGST-only controls, irrelevant protein controls
Proximity labeling (BioID/TurboID)Identification of spatially proximate proteins in cellular contextBiotin ligase-only controls, subcellular fractionation validation

The completely randomized design approach is appropriate for initial screening experiments, where different potential interaction partners can be randomly assigned to experimental conditions . For more complex studies examining variables such as cellular stress conditions or mutation effects, a randomized complete block design may be more appropriate to control for these variations .

How can researchers effectively analyze the role of jip5 in fungal stress response pathways?

To investigate jip5's potential role in stress response pathways, researchers should implement a multi-faceted approach based on methodologies established for similar proteins like RODA:

  • Generate conditional knockout or knockdown strains using CRISPR-Cas9 or RNAi technologies

  • Subject knockout and wild-type strains to a battery of stress conditions (oxidative, thermal, osmotic, etc.)

  • Quantify survival rates, growth kinetics, and morphological changes

  • Perform transcriptomic and proteomic analyses to identify differentially regulated pathways

When quantifying phenotypic changes, researchers should employ rigorous statistical analysis methods appropriate for the experimental design used. For instance, with a completely randomized design testing multiple stress conditions, analysis of variance (ANOVA) would be appropriate to determine significant differences in stress response parameters .

Similar to RODA's role in environmental stress resistance, jip5 may participate in stress response through protein-protein interactions that regulate cellular adaptation mechanisms . Understanding these interactions requires careful experimental design with appropriate controls and statistical power analysis to detect meaningful differences.

What methodologies are most effective for studying jip5 localization and dynamics during infection processes?

Understanding the spatiotemporal dynamics of jip5 during infection processes requires sophisticated imaging and biochemical approaches:

  • Generate fluorescently tagged jip5 fusion proteins (ensuring tags don't interfere with function)

  • Employ live-cell confocal microscopy to track localization during host-pathogen interaction

  • Utilize super-resolution microscopy techniques (STED, STORM) for detailed subcellular localization

  • Perform fractionation studies to biochemically verify localization patterns

Drawing parallels to how WDR5 translocates to viral inclusion bodies during infection , researchers should investigate whether jip5 undergoes similar dynamic relocalization during infection processes. This requires experimental designs that can capture protein movements across different infection timepoints with appropriate controls to distinguish specific from non-specific localization.

How does jip5 potentially modulate host immune responses during infection?

Based on insights from WDR5 research in viral systems, jip5 may potentially interact with host immune mechanisms. To investigate this, researchers should consider the following methodological approach:

  • Perform infection studies comparing wild-type N. fumigata with jip5-deficient strains

  • Quantify host immune markers (cytokines, immune cell recruitment, signaling pathway activation)

  • Utilize immunoprecipitation approaches to identify potential host protein binding partners

  • Examine effects on specific immune pathways, such as the protein kinase R (PKR) pathway

Drawing parallels from how WDR5 suppresses the double-stranded RNA-mediated activation of protein kinase R and integrated stress response during viral infection , researchers should investigate whether jip5 plays analogous roles during fungal infection. This requires careful experimental design that can distinguish direct effects from secondary consequences of altered fungal fitness.

What experimental approaches can detect potential jip5 interactions with host stress response pathways?

To investigate potential interactions between jip5 and host stress response pathways, researchers should implement the following experimental approaches:

Experimental TechniqueApplicationReadout
Reporter cell linesMonitor activation of stress response pathwaysLuciferase/fluorescent protein expression
Western blottingDetect phosphorylation of stress response proteinsQuantification of phospho-proteins
RNA-seqGlobal transcriptional responses to jip5 exposureDifferentially expressed gene clusters
Proximity labeling in co-culture systemsIdentify direct interaction partners in host cellsMass spectrometry identification of labeled proteins

These approaches should be designed with appropriate statistical power to detect meaningful effects. For instance, when comparing multiple experimental conditions, a power analysis should be conducted considering the expected effect size and variability to determine appropriate sample sizes .

How can structural analysis of jip5 inform development of targeted antifungal strategies?

Advanced structural characterization of jip5 provides opportunities for rational design of inhibitors that could disrupt protein-protein interactions crucial for fungal pathogenesis:

  • Perform X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM to determine high-resolution structures

  • Identify critical binding pockets and interaction surfaces using computational analysis

  • Conduct in silico screening of compound libraries targeting identified sites

  • Validate lead compounds using binding assays and functional studies

Similar to how understanding the binding motifs on WDR5 has revealed mechanisms of protein recruitment to viral inclusion bodies , structural characterization of jip5 could identify critical interfaces that mediate fungal-specific interactions. This approach requires iterative refinement between structural studies and functional validation.

What are the methodological considerations for studying post-translational modifications of jip5?

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) often regulate protein function, and investigating PTMs of jip5 requires specialized approaches:

  • Employ mass spectrometry-based proteomics with enrichment strategies for specific modifications

  • Develop site-specific antibodies for detected modifications

  • Create site-directed mutants to assess functional significance of modification sites

  • Examine dynamic changes in modifications under various stress conditions or during infection

When designing these experiments, researchers should include appropriate controls for enrichment specificity and consider the temporal dynamics of modifications. Statistical analysis should account for technical variability in modification detection, potentially using approaches like multiple reaction monitoring for quantitative assessment.

What strategies can address protein solubility issues during recombinant jip5 production?

Researchers working with recombinant WD repeat-containing proteins often encounter solubility challenges. Based on approaches successful with other N. fumigata proteins, consider the following methodological solutions:

  • Optimize expression conditions: Test lower induction temperatures (16-18°C), reduced inducer concentrations, and slower expression rates

  • Modify buffer compositions: Include solubility enhancers such as glycerol (up to 50% as used with RODA proteins), mild detergents, or arginine

  • Express protein fragments: Identify and express stable domains rather than full-length protein

  • Employ solubility tags: Fusion with MBP, SUMO, or other solubility-enhancing tags

  • Co-express with binding partners: Identify natural binding partners that may stabilize the protein structure

For long-term storage stability, similar considerations to RODA proteins apply - avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles and store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week . For longer-term storage, maintaining protein in buffer with 50% glycerol at -20°C/-80°C can extend shelf life to approximately 6 months .

How can researchers address specificity concerns in jip5 functional studies?

Ensuring specificity in functional studies presents significant challenges. To address these concerns:

  • Implement multiple control conditions, including:

    • Wild-type strains

    • Strains expressing mutant versions of jip5

    • Complemented knockout strains

    • Strains with knockouts of unrelated proteins

  • Utilize orthogonal methodologies to validate findings

  • Perform dose-response analyses where applicable

  • Include competition assays to demonstrate binding specificity

When analyzing experimental results, appropriate statistical approaches should be selected based on the specific experimental design. For completely randomized designs, ANOVA followed by appropriate post-hoc tests would be suitable, while for more complex designs with blocking factors, mixed models may be more appropriate .

What emerging technologies show promise for advancing jip5 research?

Several cutting-edge technologies offer new approaches for investigating jip5 function:

  • CRISPR-based screening approaches for systematic identification of genetic interactions

  • Single-cell transcriptomics to reveal heterogeneity in response to jip5 manipulation

  • Advanced protein-protein interaction mapping using approaches like hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry

  • In situ structural determination methods like cryo-electron tomography

  • Microfluidic systems for monitoring real-time host-pathogen interactions

These emerging technologies enable researchers to address previously intractable questions about jip5 function with increased resolution and throughput, providing new insights into the complex roles of WD repeat-containing proteins in fungal biology.

How can researchers design studies to investigate potential roles of jip5 in antifungal resistance?

To investigate potential contributions of jip5 to antifungal resistance, researchers should consider the following experimental approach:

Research ObjectiveMethodologyKey Measurements
Baseline susceptibility profilingBroth microdilution assaysMIC determination for multiple antifungal classes
Expression patterns during drug exposureqRT-PCR, RNA-seqFold-change in expression relative to housekeeping genes
Phenotypic consequences of altered expressionGeneration of overexpression/knockout strainsSurvival curves, growth inhibition zones
Mechanistic investigationsBiochemical assays targeting specific resistance mechanismsDrug accumulation, target enzyme activity

Similar to how RODA contributes to environmental stress resistance , jip5 may potentially modulate stress responses related to antifungal exposure. Experimental designs should incorporate appropriate controls and statistical approaches to ensure that observed effects are specifically attributable to jip5 rather than general stress responses or other compensatory mechanisms.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2024 Thebiotek. All Rights Reserved.