Recombinant Neurospora crassa Diphthamide biosynthesis protein 4 (dph-4)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order remarks for customized fulfillment.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notification and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our default glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The specific tag type is determined during production. If a particular tag type is required, please inform us for prioritized development.
Synonyms
dph-4; NCU02805Diphthamide biosynthesis protein 4
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-219
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Neurospora crassa (strain ATCC 24698 / 74-OR23-1A / CBS 708.71 / DSM 1257 / FGSC 987)
Target Names
dph-4
Target Protein Sequence
MSQPTFYEIL SLSPTTSDLT PASIKQAYRR ALLTHHPDKS SSNFSSSTSN SHSNSHPKGH HPPKTRYTID QISLAYTTLS SPTLRTQYDA ALRSSSSSSS SCFTTTRKEE DDDFQTGIDT IDLDDMVFVP HETSSSAGIS RNEKDTWYRP CRCGNERGFA LTEEDLEENA DLGEVLVQCA DCTIWLRVCY VVAEDDEEEE EEKEENGDGD GYEEEKRKR
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

Recombinant Neurospora crassa Diphthamide biosynthesis protein 4 (dph-4) is essential for the initial step in diphthamide biosynthesis: the transfer of 3-amino-3-carboxypropyl from S-adenosyl-L-methionine to a histidine residue. Diphthamide is a post-translational modification of histidine found in elongation factor 2.

Database Links

KEGG: ncr:NCU02805

Protein Families
DPH4 family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm. Nucleus.

Q&A

What is diphthamide biosynthesis protein 4 (dph-4) in Neurospora crassa?

Diphthamide biosynthesis protein 4 (dph-4) in Neurospora crassa is a CSL zinc finger-containing DnaJ-like protein involved in the conserved pathway that creates diphthamide, a posttranslationally modified histidine residue found exclusively in translation elongation factor 2 (eEF-2). This modification is conserved across eukaryotes and archaebacteria, highlighting its evolutionary importance. Dph-4 functions as part of a multi-protein complex that catalyzes the first step of diphthamide biosynthesis .

The protein contains characteristic J-domain features that classify it as an Hsp70 cochaperone, which suggests its involvement in protein folding and stability. Additionally, research indicates that dph-4 likely participates in maintaining or assembling the iron-sulfur clusters required for the diphthamide biosynthesis process .

How does N. crassa dph-4 differ structurally from its homologs in other species?

The structural comparison between N. crassa dph-4 and its homologs reveals both conserved domains and species-specific features:

SpeciesKey Structural FeaturesJ-domainMetal-binding LoopNotable Differences
N. crassaCSL zinc finger, J-domainPresentPresentFungal-specific variations in non-conserved regions
S. cerevisiaeCSL zinc finger, J-domainPresentContains proline at position 114Functional dependence on proline in metal-binding loop
ArabidopsisExtended C-terminusPresentLacks proline in metal-binding loopInsertion of proline at position 114 renders it inactive in yeast
MammalsCSL zinc finger, J-domainPresentVariable proline contentAdditional regulatory domains

The functional significance of these structural differences has been demonstrated through complementation studies. For example, when the proline residue in the S. cerevisiae Dph4 metal-binding loop is deleted, the protein loses functionality. Conversely, inserting a proline into the Arabidopsis Dph4 at the equivalent position (P114) renders the protein inactive in yeast complementation assays .

What are the optimal expression systems for producing recombinant N. crassa dph-4?

When selecting an expression system for recombinant N. crassa dph-4, several factors must be considered to ensure proper protein folding and functionality:

  • E. coli expression systems: While bacterial expression systems offer high yields, they may not properly form the iron-sulfur clusters essential for dph-4 function. If using E. coli, consider specialized strains such as Rosetta or BL21(DE3) with co-expression of chaperones to assist proper folding of this J-domain-containing protein.

  • Yeast expression systems: S. cerevisiae or P. pastoris systems may provide a more suitable eukaryotic environment for proper folding and post-translational modifications. Given the functional complementation demonstrated between fungal dph4 homologs, yeast expression can be particularly effective .

  • Insect cell systems: Baculovirus expression systems offer advantages for proteins requiring complex folding, such as those containing zinc fingers like dph-4.

For functional studies, expression constructs should preserve the integrity of both the J-domain and the metal-binding loop, as deletion or modification of these regions has been shown to abrogate function .

What are the challenges in purifying active recombinant dph-4 and how can they be overcome?

Purification of active recombinant dph-4 presents several challenges related to its structural characteristics:

Key Challenges:

  • Maintaining the integrity of the [4Fe-4S] cluster during purification

  • Preserving the zinc-binding capacity of the CSL zinc finger domain

  • Preventing aggregation due to exposed hydrophobic surfaces in the J-domain

Recommended Protocol:

  • Anaerobic conditions: Since [4Fe-4S] clusters are oxygen-sensitive, purify dph-4 under anaerobic conditions, similar to protocols used for Dph2 .

  • Buffer optimization: Include stabilizing agents in purification buffers:

    • 10% glycerol to prevent protein aggregation

    • 1-5 mM DTT or 2-mercaptoethanol to maintain reduced cysteines

    • 50-100 μM zinc chloride to stabilize the zinc finger domain

  • Affinity purification strategy:

    • N-terminal His6-tag followed by TEV protease cleavage site

    • Avoid C-terminal tags that may interfere with J-domain function

  • Verification methods:

    • UV-Vis spectroscopy (characteristic absorption at ~410 nm for [4Fe-4S] clusters)

    • Iron content determination using ferrozine assay

    • Circular dichroism to confirm proper folding

Researchers have successfully used similar approaches for the related Dph2 protein, demonstrating that anaerobic conditions and proper reducing agents are critical for maintaining Fe-S cluster integrity .

What experimental approaches can determine the interaction partners of dph-4?

To comprehensively map the interaction network of dph-4, multiple complementary approaches should be employed:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) followed by mass spectrometry:

    • Express FLAG- or HA-tagged dph-4 in N. crassa

    • Perform pull-downs under native conditions

    • Identify binding partners by mass spectrometry

    • Validate key interactions with reverse Co-IP

  • Yeast two-hybrid screening:

    • Use dph-4 as bait against N. crassa cDNA library

    • Consider using domain-specific constructs to identify domain-specific interactions

    • Validate with targeted Y2H assays for suspected partners (Dph1-3, Hsp70)

  • Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC):

    • Create fusion constructs with split fluorescent proteins

    • Express in N. crassa to visualize interactions in vivo

    • Particularly useful for validating interactions with known diphthamide biosynthesis proteins

  • Proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID):

    • Fuse dph-4 to a biotin ligase

    • Express in N. crassa to biotinylate proximal proteins

    • Identify biotinylated proteins by pull-down and mass spectrometry

  • Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) or Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC):

    • Use purified recombinant proteins to quantify binding affinities

    • Determine binding kinetics and thermodynamics

    • Particularly important for validating direct interactions with Dph1-3 and Hsp70

Expected interaction partners based on current knowledge include other diphthamide biosynthesis proteins (Dph1-3, Dph5), Hsp70 chaperones, and potentially proteins involved in iron-sulfur cluster assembly or transfer .

How can mutagenesis studies of dph-4 reveal structure-function relationships?

Strategic mutagenesis of dph-4 can provide critical insights into its functional domains and mechanistic role in diphthamide biosynthesis. Based on current understanding, the following mutagenesis approach is recommended:

Domain-specific mutagenesis strategy:

DomainResidues to TargetExpected Functional ImpactExperimental Readout
J-domainHPD motif conserved in DnaJ proteinsDisruption of Hsp70 interactionLoss of complementation in dph4Δ yeast
Metal-binding loopConserved cysteine residuesDisruption of Fe-binding capacityAltered iron content; loss of function
CSL zinc fingerConserved cysteine/histidine residuesDisruption of zinc coordinationStructural instability; loss of function
Interdomain linkersProline residuesAltered domain orientation/flexibilityVariable effects on function

Experimental validation approaches:

  • Complementation assays: Test mutant constructs for their ability to restore diphthamide biosynthesis in dph4Δ yeast strains using diphtheria toxin sensitivity as a readout .

  • Biochemical characterization: Purify mutant proteins and assess:

    • Metal content (iron, zinc) using atomic absorption spectroscopy

    • Interaction with Hsp70 using pull-down assays

    • Structural integrity using circular dichroism or thermal shift assays

  • In vivo localization: Create GFP-tagged mutants to track subcellular localization and potential co-localization with other diphthamide biosynthesis components.

Research on related Dph4 proteins has already demonstrated the critical importance of the metal-binding loop structure. For instance, deletion of a proline residue in S. cerevisiae Dph4's metal-binding loop abolished function, while a P114A substitution retained functionality .

What is the relationship between dph-4 function and the unique epigenetic features of N. crassa?

N. crassa possesses several unique epigenetic features that distinguish it from other model organisms, including DNA methylation and RNAi-based silencing mechanisms. The potential relationship between dph-4 function and these epigenetic features represents an intriguing area for advanced research.

Research directions to explore this relationship:

  • Impact of diphthamide modification on translation of epigenetic regulators:

    • Diphthamide-modified eEF2 may influence the translation of specific mRNAs encoding epigenetic regulators

    • Perform ribosome profiling in wild-type versus dph4 mutant strains to identify differentially translated mRNAs

  • Potential role in repeat-induced point mutation (RIP):

    • N. crassa's RIP mechanism involves homology detection in a RecA-independent manner

    • Investigate whether dph-4 mutants show altered RIP efficiency or specificity

    • Examine potential interactions between dph-4 and known RIP components

  • Relationship with meiotic silencing:

    • N. crassa has RNAi-based silencing mechanisms operating in meiotic cells

    • Test whether dph-4 mutations affect meiotic silencing efficiency

    • Investigate potential physical or functional interactions with meiotic silencing components

  • Connection to DNA methylation:

    • N. crassa contains DNA methylation patterns absent in yeasts but present in higher eukaryotes

    • Profile DNA methylation patterns in dph-4 mutants versus wild-type

    • Investigate whether translation of DNA methyltransferases is affected by diphthamide deficiency

This research direction is particularly significant as N. crassa uniquely combines features of higher eukaryotes (DNA methylation, H3K27 methylation) with tractable genetics, potentially offering insights into the evolution of translation regulation and epigenetic control .

How do the functions of dph-4 differ between N. crassa and other model organisms?

The functional comparison of dph-4 across species reveals both conserved roles and evolutionary adaptations:

Organismdph-4 FunctionUnique FeaturesResearch Evidence
N. crassaIron-binding, Hsp70 cochaperoneIntegration with fungal-specific epigenetic mechanismsComparative genomic analyses
S. cerevisiaeCritical for diphthamide synthesis; proline in metal-binding loop essentialFunctions in heterodimeric complex with Dph3Deletion and complementation studies
ArabidopsisIron-binding; cannot complement yeast dph4Δ when proline insertedDifferent metal-binding loop structureMutational studies showing insertion of proline at position 114 abrogates function
MammalsComponent of diphthamide synthesis; potential tumor suppressorAdditional regulatory domains and tissue-specific expressionOVCA1 (human homolog) studies
ArchaeaAbsent; Dph2 alone sufficient for first stepN/ABiochemical reconstitution of diphthamide synthesis with Dph2 only

These functional differences reflect the evolutionary divergence of diphthamide biosynthesis. In archaea, a single Dph2 enzyme catalyzes the first step of diphthamide biosynthesis, while eukaryotes require a more complex machinery involving Dph1-4 . The requirement for dph-4 in eukaryotes likely evolved with increasing cellular complexity and the need for more sophisticated regulation of Fe-S cluster assembly and protein folding.

Of particular significance is the finding that Arabidopsis Dph4, when modified to include a proline in its metal-binding loop (mimicking yeast Dph4), loses function rather than gaining it . This counterintuitive result suggests that evolutionary divergence has led to distinct structural requirements for Dph4 function in different lineages.

What insights can recombinant N. crassa dph-4 provide for understanding diphthamide biosynthesis across species?

Recombinant N. crassa dph-4 offers a valuable model for comparative studies of diphthamide biosynthesis for several reasons:

  • Evolutionary position: N. crassa occupies an intermediate evolutionary position between simpler unicellular yeasts and complex multicellular eukaryotes, potentially preserving ancestral features of the diphthamide biosynthesis pathway.

  • Experimental advantages: N. crassa combines genetic tractability with features more similar to higher eukaryotes than yeasts, including chromatin structure and epigenetic mechanisms .

  • Structural insights: Comparative structural analysis of N. crassa dph-4 can illuminate the evolution of iron-binding domains and J-domain functions in diphthamide biosynthesis proteins.

Research approaches leveraging N. crassa dph-4:

  • Heterologous complementation studies: Test the ability of dph-4 from various species to complement N. crassa dph-4 mutants, providing insights into functional conservation and divergence.

  • Domain swap experiments: Create chimeric proteins combining domains from dph-4 homologs across species to map functional domain boundaries and species-specific adaptations.

  • Biochemical reconstitution: Use purified recombinant components from N. crassa and other species to reconstitute diphthamide biosynthesis in vitro, revealing species-specific requirements and catalytic mechanisms.

  • Evolutionary rate analysis: Compare evolutionary rates of dph genes across fungal lineages to identify patterns of selection and co-evolution among diphthamide biosynthesis components.

This research would extend current understanding that shows the first step of diphthamide biosynthesis in archaea requires only Dph2, while eukaryotes require an expanded set of proteins including dph-4 . The underlying reasons for this increased complexity remain largely unknown and represent an important area for investigation.

What are the best approaches for analyzing the iron-binding properties of recombinant dph-4?

The iron-binding properties of recombinant dph-4 can be comprehensively analyzed using multiple complementary techniques:

  • UV-Visible Spectroscopy:

    • Scan purified protein from 300-700 nm to detect characteristic absorption peaks for Fe-S clusters (~410 nm)

    • Compare spectra before and after reduction with dithionite

    • Monitor changes during anaerobic versus aerobic conditions

  • Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) Spectroscopy:

    • Characterize the oxidation state and coordination environment of iron

    • Perform measurements at different temperatures (4K, 77K, 298K)

    • Compare signals with known Fe-S cluster standards

  • Mössbauer Spectroscopy:

    • Express protein in media containing 57Fe

    • Precisely determine the oxidation state and coordination geometry of iron

    • Distinguish between different types of Fe-S clusters

  • Iron Content Determination:

    • Colorimetric ferrozine assay after acid denaturation

    • Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for precise quantification

    • Compare iron:protein stoichiometry under different conditions

  • Site-Directed Mutagenesis:

    • Systematically mutate putative iron-coordinating residues

    • Measure changes in iron content and spectroscopic properties

    • Correlate with functional complementation assays

Similar approaches have been successfully used to characterize the [4Fe-4S] cluster in Dph2, revealing its essential role in catalyzing the first step of diphthamide biosynthesis . These methods should be performed under anaerobic conditions when possible, as Fe-S clusters are typically oxygen-sensitive.

How can researchers effectively analyze the function of dph-4 in the context of diphthamide biosynthesis?

To comprehensively analyze dph-4 function in diphthamide biosynthesis, a multi-faceted approach combining in vivo and in vitro methods is recommended:

In vivo approaches:

  • CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing:

    • Generate precise dph-4 knockouts in N. crassa

    • Create specific point mutations in functional domains

    • Develop tagged versions for localization and interaction studies

  • Diphtheria toxin sensitivity assays:

    • Expose wild-type and mutant cells to diphtheria toxin

    • Quantify cell survival as an indirect measure of diphthamide modification

    • Use as a functional readout for complementation experiments

  • Mass spectrometry of eEF2:

    • Purify eEF2 from wild-type and dph-4 mutant strains

    • Analyze diphthamide modification status using high-resolution MS

    • Quantify partial modifications to detect intermediates

In vitro approaches:

What are the most significant recent advances in understanding dph-4 function?

Recent studies have made significant progress in elucidating the function of dph-4 and its homologs:

These advances have significantly expanded our understanding of dph-4 beyond its initially proposed role in diphthamide biosynthesis, suggesting broader functions in cellular metabolism and protein homeostasis.

What are the most promising directions for future research on N. crassa dph-4?

Future research on N. crassa dph-4 should explore several promising directions:

  • Structural biology approaches:

    • Determine high-resolution structures of dph-4 alone and in complex with other Dph proteins

    • Characterize conformational changes associated with iron binding and release

    • Elucidate the molecular basis of J-domain interactions with Hsp70

  • Systems biology integration:

    • Map the complete interactome of dph-4 using proximity labeling approaches

    • Perform transcriptomics and proteomics in dph-4 mutants to identify affected pathways

    • Develop computational models of the diphthamide biosynthesis pathway

  • Evolutionary studies:

    • Conduct comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of dph genes across diverse fungi

    • Investigate co-evolution patterns between dph-4 and its interaction partners

    • Test functional conservation through cross-species complementation

  • Connection to epigenetic mechanisms:

    • Investigate potential links between diphthamide modification and N. crassa's unique epigenetic features

    • Examine whether dph-4 influences repeat-induced point mutation (RIP) or meiotic silencing

    • Explore potential translation-epigenetic crosstalk mediated by diphthamide

  • Metabolic integration:

    • Characterize the role of dph-4 in cellular iron homeostasis

    • Investigate connections between diphthamide biosynthesis and other Fe-S cluster-dependent pathways

    • Examine metabolic changes in dph-4 mutants under various stress conditions

These research directions would leverage N. crassa's unique position as a model organism with features of both simpler fungi and more complex eukaryotes , potentially revealing fundamental insights into the evolution and function of diphthamide biosynthesis.

What are the key considerations for researchers new to working with recombinant N. crassa dph-4?

Researchers beginning work with recombinant N. crassa dph-4 should consider several critical factors:

  • Protein stability considerations:

    • The presence of a J-domain and potential iron-binding properties makes dph-4 susceptible to aggregation and oxidative damage

    • Always include reducing agents (DTT or β-mercaptoethanol) in buffers

    • Work under anaerobic conditions when possible, especially for functional studies

  • Expression optimization:

    • Consider codon optimization for the expression host

    • Include solubility tags (MBP, SUMO) for initial expression trials

    • Co-express with chaperones to improve folding and solubility

  • Functional validation:

    • Establish reliable functional assays (complementation, interaction studies)

    • Include appropriate positive and negative controls

    • Consider the impact of tags on protein function

  • Species considerations:

    • Be aware that functional differences exist between dph-4 homologs

    • Constructs that work in one species may not function in another

    • Consider the evolutionary context when interpreting results

  • Interdisciplinary approach:

    • Combine genetic, biochemical, and structural approaches

    • Consider the broader cellular context, including interactions with other diphthamide biosynthesis proteins

    • Integrate findings with the extensive knowledge base on N. crassa biology

By addressing these considerations, researchers can effectively study this complex protein and contribute to our understanding of diphthamide biosynthesis, a fundamental and evolutionarily conserved process with implications for translation regulation and cellular metabolism .

How can findings from N. crassa dph-4 research be applied to broader biological questions?

Research on N. crassa dph-4 has implications that extend far beyond this specific protein or organism:

  • Evolution of translation regulation:

    • Diphthamide is a highly conserved modification from archaebacteria to humans

    • Understanding its biosynthesis provides insights into the evolution of translation fidelity mechanisms

    • Comparative studies across species illuminate how complex regulatory pathways evolve

  • Iron-sulfur cluster biology:

    • dph-4's role in Fe-S cluster assembly or maintenance connects to broader questions in Fe-S protein biology

    • Insights may apply to understanding human diseases associated with Fe-S cluster defects

    • The unique properties of dph-4 may reveal novel aspects of Fe-S cluster biosynthesis

  • Protein co-chaperone function:

    • As a J-domain protein, dph-4 research contributes to understanding Hsp70 co-chaperone networks

    • Findings may illuminate how co-chaperones achieve substrate specificity

    • Novel regulatory mechanisms for chaperone networks may be discovered

  • Model system development:

    • N. crassa combines experimental tractability with features absent in yeast but present in higher eukaryotes

    • Methodologies developed for dph-4 may apply to other difficult-to-study proteins

    • The knowledge gained strengthens N. crassa as a model for complex eukaryotic processes

  • Therapeutic relevance:

    • Understanding diphthamide biosynthesis has implications for bacterial toxin resistance

    • The human homolog OVCA1 has tumor suppressor properties

    • Insights may reveal novel approaches to modulating translation in disease contexts

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.