Recombinant Neurospora crassa histone chaperone Rtt-106 is a protein engineered to facilitate nucleosome assembly and chromatin dynamics in eukaryotic systems. Derived from the fungus Neurospora crassa, this chaperone plays roles analogous to its yeast homolog in stabilizing histone complexes and ensuring genomic integrity during DNA replication and repair . The recombinant form is produced in yeast expression systems, enabling high-yield purification for research applications .
The recombinant protein is expressed in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and purified to >85% homogeneity via affinity chromatography .
Parameter | Details |
---|---|
Expression Host | Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
Tag | Polyhistidine (His-tag) |
Purity | >85% (SDS-PAGE) |
Buffer | Tris-based, 50% glycerol |
Yield | 0.2–2 mg/mL |
Recombinant Rtt-106 is utilized in:
Chromatin Assembly Studies: Investigating nucleosome retention during transcription .
Transcriptional Regulation: Analyzing histone deposition over gene bodies to prevent transcriptional noise .
DNA Repair Mechanisms: Studying roles in genomic integrity under genotoxic stress .
While structural data for Neurospora Rtt-106 is limited, functional parallels with yeast Rtt106 include:
KEGG: ncr:NCU08161
RTT106 from Neurospora crassa is a 469-amino acid histone chaperone protein that facilitates nucleosome assembly by promoting the deposition of histone complexes onto DNA . As a histone chaperone, RTT106 plays a crucial role in chromatin organization during DNA replication and other cellular processes. The recombinant form (e.g., ABIN1676071) is typically expressed in yeast systems with a His-tag for purification and experimental applications .
The protein functions primarily to bind histone H3-H4 complexes and deposit them onto DNA during nucleosome formation . This activity is particularly important during S phase of the cell cycle when chromatin needs to be reassembled following DNA replication.
Neurospora crassa RTT106 shares functional conservation with homologs from other fungal species, though with some structural variations:
Organism | Amino Acid Length | Notable Features |
---|---|---|
Neurospora crassa | 469 | Full-length with His tag available for research applications |
Saccharomyces cerevisiae | 455 | Most extensively studied, two tandem PH domains |
Candida albicans | 409 | Shorter variant |
Emericella nidulans | 458 | Similar length to S. cerevisiae |
Aspergillus niger | 458 | Similar length to S. cerevisiae |
Aspergillus clavatus | 463 | Similar length to S. cerevisiae |
Aspergillus terreus | 468 | Close in length to N. crassa |
While the core functional domains are conserved across species, these length variations may reflect evolutionary adaptations to specific cellular environments . The S. cerevisiae Rtt106 has been characterized to contain two tandem PH (Pleckstrin Homology) domains connected by a disordered loop, which likely represents the conserved structural organization across fungal species .
RTT106 has been shown to bind specifically to histone H3-H4 complexes through multiple experimental approaches:
Sequential affinity purification experiments have demonstrated that RTT106 binds preferentially to (H3-H4)2 tetramers rather than H3-H4 dimers .
Mutational analyses have identified specific amino acid residues involved in histone binding .
Co-immunoprecipitation assays have confirmed the interaction between RTT106 and histones in vivo .
The binding affinity of RTT106 for histones is significantly enhanced when histone H3 is acetylated at lysine 56 (H3K56ac) .
These findings collectively establish RTT106 as a specialized histone chaperone with specific binding properties that facilitate its function in nucleosome assembly.
Based on structural studies primarily in S. cerevisiae, RTT106 contains:
An N-terminal domain (residues 1-68 in S. cerevisiae) that facilitates oligomerization
Two tandem PH (Pleckstrin Homology) domains connected by a disordered loop
A key structural discovery is that RTT106 forms homodimers through its N-terminal domain, which is critical for its ability to bind (H3-H4)2 tetramers . The full sequence of Neurospora crassa RTT106 (469 amino acids) suggests a similar domain organization with potential variations in the flexible regions .
RTT106's histone chaperone function depends on several key structural features:
A conserved basic patch within the N-terminal PH domain that is essential for histone interaction
A critical loop in the C-terminal domain containing specific residues (such as T265 in S. cerevisiae) that directly participate in histone binding
N-terminal residues that facilitate oligomerization, which is necessary for binding (H3-H4)2 tetramers
Structural analysis has revealed that these histone-binding regions lie approximately 30Å apart but collectively form a conserved interaction surface that accommodates the histone complexes . Mutational studies have demonstrated that altering the charge characteristics of the basic patch (e.g., S80E and R86A mutations in S. cerevisiae) disrupts RTT106 function, while conservative mutations that maintain charge (S80T, S80A, and R86K) preserve activity .
RTT106 undergoes oligomerization primarily through its N-terminal domain, forming homodimers or possibly higher-order oligomers . This oligomerization is functionally significant for several reasons:
It creates the appropriate structural configuration to bind (H3-H4)2 tetramers
Mutations in the N-terminal domain that disrupt oligomerization compromise RTT106's function in transcriptional silencing and genotoxic stress response
The oligomeric state affects RTT106's ability to mediate nucleosome assembly during DNA replication
Gel filtration chromatography and dynamic light scattering analyses have confirmed RTT106's oligomeric state in vitro, with the full-length protein exhibiting higher apparent molecular mass than expected for a monomer . The N-terminal 66 residues appear particularly important for this oligomerization, as truncated constructs lacking this region migrate at the expected monomeric size .
RTT106 interacts with histone proteins through two distinct surfaces that collectively form a conserved binding interface:
A basic patch within the N-terminal PH domain that contributes to electrostatic interactions with histones
A specific loop in the C-terminal domain containing crucial residues for histone binding
The interaction is significantly enhanced when histone H3 is acetylated at lysine 56 (H3K56ac), a modification that increases RTT106's binding affinity . Mutational studies have shown that changing the charge characteristics of the basic patch (through mutations like S80E) disrupts histone binding, while conservative mutations that maintain charge (S80T, S80A) preserve this function .
The structure-function relationship has been explored through targeted mutations, revealing that residues in both the N-terminal and C-terminal domains contribute to a unified histone-binding surface despite being spatially separated by approximately 30Å .
RTT106 binds to (H3-H4)2 tetramers rather than H3-H4 dimers, which has significant implications for nucleosome assembly . This was demonstrated through elegant experiments showing that H3K56R (a mutation that reduces binding to RTT106) could co-purify with RTT106 when wild-type H3 was present, suggesting that RTT106 binds heterotetramers of H3-H4 .
The significance of this stoichiometry includes:
It suggests that RTT106 deposits complete (H3-H4)2 tetramers onto DNA during nucleosome assembly, rather than sequential deposition of H3-H4 dimers
It provides insights into how nucleosomes are formed during S phase of the cell cycle
It distinguishes RTT106's mechanism from other histone chaperones like Asf1, which binds H3-H4 dimers
This tetramer-binding capacity is directly related to RTT106's N-terminal oligomerization, as mutations affecting oligomerization also compromise tetramer binding .
RTT106 physically interacts with both the SWI/SNF and RSC chromatin remodeling complexes both in vitro and in vivo, as demonstrated through GST pull-down and co-immunoprecipitation assays . This coordination is functionally significant because:
RTT106 is important for recruiting both SWI/SNF and RSC complexes to HIR-dependent histone genes
The RTT106-dependent recruitment of SWI/SNF is cell cycle regulated, occurring primarily in late G1 phase just before peak histone gene expression in S phase
SWI/SNF is required for activation of histone genes in S phase, while RSC is implicated in their repression outside of S phase
These interactions reveal RTT106's broader role in chromatin regulation beyond simple histone deposition, suggesting it functions as a coordinator between histone handling and chromatin remodeling activities during cell cycle progression .
Based on available data, the following expression systems have been used or considered for RTT106 production:
The recombinant Neurospora crassa RTT106 protein available commercially (e.g., ABIN1676071) is expressed in yeast systems with a His-tag for purification, suggesting this is currently the most validated approach .
Multiple complementary analytical approaches provide comprehensive insights into RTT106-histone interactions:
Protein-Protein Interaction Assays:
Chromatin Association Studies:
Structural and Biophysical Analyses:
Functional Assays:
These methodologies collectively provide a comprehensive view of how RTT106 interacts with histones and functions in chromatin-related processes.
Based on previous successful studies, an effective approach to RTT106 mutation analysis includes:
Structure-guided targeting: Focus on conserved residues identified through sequence alignment and structural studies:
Charge-altering vs. conservative mutations:
Functional readouts:
Domain deletion studies:
This comprehensive approach has previously revealed that surprisingly few residues (approximately 10) are critical for RTT106 function, highlighting key surfaces for histone interaction .
RTT106 plays a complex role in the transcriptional regulation of histone genes, particularly the HIR-dependent histone gene pairs (HTA1-HTB1, HHT1-HHF1, and HHT2-HHF2) in S. cerevisiae . Key aspects of this regulation include:
Recruitment of chromatin remodeling complexes:
Cell cycle-dependent regulation:
Transcriptional repression:
This sophisticated regulatory mechanism ensures that histone genes are expressed at the appropriate time during the cell cycle, coordinating histone production with DNA replication requirements.
Post-translational modifications of histones significantly influence their interaction with RTT106, with H3K56 acetylation being particularly important:
H3K56 acetylation effects:
Acetylation of histone H3 at lysine 56 (H3K56ac) significantly enhances binding to RTT106
Mutating lysine 56 of H3 to arginine (H3K56R) substantially reduces binding to RTT106
In the presence of wild-type H3, H3K56R can still co-purify with RTT106 when part of a heterotetramer, further supporting the tetramer-binding model
Cell cycle significance:
Structural implications:
The interaction between RTT106 and H3K56ac represents an important link between histone modification status and nucleosome assembly processes during DNA replication.
RTT106's involvement in genotoxic stress response has significant implications for DNA damage research:
Experimental evidence:
Potential mechanisms:
RTT106 may facilitate chromatin reassembly following DNA repair, helping to restore proper chromatin structure
By preferentially binding H3K56ac-containing histones, RTT106 might direct newly synthesized histones to sites of DNA damage repair
Coordination with chromatin remodeling complexes may help regulate accessibility of DNA repair machinery to damaged sites
Research applications:
RTT106 can serve as a model for understanding how histone chaperones contribute to maintaining genome stability
Studying the interplay between RTT106 and DNA damage response pathways may reveal new therapeutic targets for diseases involving genomic instability
The conserved nature of RTT106 across fungal species suggests potential relevance of findings to broader eukaryotic systems
This connection between histone chaperone function and DNA damage response highlights the intimate relationship between chromatin dynamics and genome maintenance mechanisms.