Recombinant Neurospora crassa Leucine aminopeptidase 1 (lap1)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized fulfillment.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice shipping is specifically requested and pre-arranged. Additional fees apply for dry ice shipping.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which can serve as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid forms have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
lap1; NCU04479Leucine aminopeptidase 1; EC 3.4.11.-; Leucyl aminopeptidase 1; LAP1
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
93-402
Protein Length
Full Length of Mature Protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Neurospora crassa (strain ATCC 24698 / 74-OR23-1A / CBS 708.71 / DSM 1257 / FGSC 987)
Target Names
lap1
Target Protein Sequence
SVFPKKPT QKKDLEPLLK NLSKTEMEDH LTTFTSFHTR YYKSESGRQS SEWLLKQVRD TIKAAGADDT VTARHFEHAW GQNSIIATIP GKTNATVVIG AHQDSINLWL PSVLAAPGAD DDGSGTVTIL EAFRVLLQSE DIIKGNHENT IEFHWYSAEE GGLLGSQAIF TTYEKARRDV KAMLQQDMTG FVSRTLQAGE VESVGVIVDY VDPNLTDFIK KIIVEYCDIP YVETKCGYAC SDHASASKAG YPSAFVIESA FEYSDNHIHT TDDLIKYLSF DHMLQHARMT LAFAYELAFA DFAKLEKGHG DL
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

Extracellular aminopeptidase facilitating the assimilation of proteinaceous substrates.

Database Links

KEGG: ncr:NCU04479

Protein Families
Peptidase M28 family, M28E subfamily
Subcellular Location
Secreted.

Q&A

What is the genomic organization of lap1 and how does it relate to other N. crassa peptidases?

Neurospora crassa possesses multiple intracellular peptidases with overlapping substrate specificities, with at least eleven distinct intracellular peptidases identified through electrophoretic separation and verified by their individual patterns of substrate specificities . The lap1 gene is part of this complex peptidase system in N. crassa. While we don't have specific information about lap1 from the search results, we can understand its context by examining similar enzymatic systems in this organism. For instance, studies of other Neurospora genes like leu-1, which encodes beta-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase in the leucine biosynthetic pathway, reveal that N. crassa genes often contain introns in their 5' portions, with some introns located within the 5'-noncoding regions of transcripts . Comparative genomic analysis with related fungal species can help elucidate the evolutionary conservation of lap1 and its potential role in amino acid metabolism.

How does lap1 fit into the broader peptidase classification system?

As an aminopeptidase, lap1 belongs to a class of enzymes that catalyze the removal of amino acids from the N-terminus of peptides. Research on Neurospora peptidases has shown that these enzymes display overlapping substrate specificities, with most peptide substrates being hydrolyzed by several different peptidases . For instance, peptidase II in N. crassa was characterized as an aminopeptidase with activity toward many peptides of varied composition and size, showing stronger activity with tripeptides than homologous dipeptides and particularly high activity toward methionine-containing peptides . Understanding lap1's precise position within this classification requires detailed biochemical characterization of its substrate preferences and catalytic properties in comparison to other characterized N. crassa peptidases.

What cellular processes involve lap1 in N. crassa?

Peptidases in N. crassa likely play overlapping roles in several basic cellular processes. Studies have shown that the amount of peptidase activity for substrates like leucylglycine remains relatively constant in crude extracts of cells grown under widely different conditions, suggesting constitutive expression of these enzymes . This indicates that lap1 likely functions in fundamental cellular processes rather than specialized, inducible pathways. These processes may include protein turnover, amino acid recycling, and post-translational processing. Additionally, given the role of other peptidases in nitrogen metabolism, lap1 may contribute to nitrogen utilization, as N. crassa can utilize exogenous proteins as its sole source of nitrogen, sulfur, or carbon .

What expression systems are most effective for recombinant production of N. crassa lap1?

For recombinant production of N. crassa lap1, heterologous expression systems must be carefully selected based on codon optimization, post-translational modification requirements, and protein folding considerations. E. coli expression systems offer simplicity and high yields but may struggle with eukaryotic protein folding. Yeast systems like Pichia pastoris may provide a more suitable eukaryotic environment while maintaining reasonable yields. When designing expression constructs, researchers should consider incorporating techniques similar to those used for other N. crassa proteins, such as the PCR-stitching approach used to create modified gene constructs for homologous recombination . Creating a construct with appropriate fusion tags for purification while maintaining enzymatic activity is crucial. The selection of promoters and signal sequences should be optimized based on the expression host and desired localization of the recombinant protein.

What purification strategies yield the highest activity retention for recombinant lap1?

Purification strategies for recombinant lap1 should focus on maintaining enzyme stability and activity. Based on studies of other N. crassa peptidases, it's important to consider that lap1 might contain essential sulfhydryl groups and potentially be a metalloenzyme . Therefore, purification buffers should include appropriate reducing agents (such as DTT or β-mercaptoethanol) to protect thiol groups and possibly metal ion cofactors to maintain structural integrity. A multi-step purification approach is typically necessary, combining techniques such as:

  • Affinity chromatography using fusion tags (His-tag, GST-tag)

  • Ion exchange chromatography based on the predicted isoelectric point

  • Size exclusion chromatography for final polishing

During each step, activity assays should be performed to track enzyme recovery and identify conditions that preserve function. Additionally, protease inhibitors should be included in early purification steps to prevent degradation by endogenous proteases from the expression host.

Purification StepRecommended ConditionsConsiderations
Affinity ChromatographypH 7.0-8.0, 150-300 mM NaCl, 1-5 mM reducing agentChoose tag based on minimal interference with activity
Ion ExchangepH based on theoretical pI, low salt for bindingMonitor activity in fractions carefully
Size ExclusionPhysiological buffer conditionsDetermine oligomeric state

How can researchers overcome solubility challenges with recombinant lap1?

Solubility challenges with recombinant lap1 can be addressed through multiple approaches. First, fusion partners known to enhance solubility (such as MBP, SUMO, or Thioredoxin) can be employed at the N-terminus of the construct. Second, expression conditions should be optimized by testing different temperatures (often lower temperatures improve folding), inducer concentrations, and expression durations. Third, co-expression with molecular chaperones can facilitate proper folding of challenging proteins. Based on the characteristics of other N. crassa peptidases, researchers should be particularly aware that lap1 might be sensitive to oxidation and metal ion availability . Therefore, incorporating reducing agents and appropriate metal ions in the growth media and lysis buffers may significantly improve solubility and activity. If inclusion bodies form despite these measures, refolding protocols using gradual dialysis from denaturing conditions can be developed, though with careful attention to recovery of enzymatic activity.

What structural features are critical for lap1 catalytic activity?

While the specific structural features of N. crassa lap1 have not been detailed in the provided search results, insights can be drawn from studies of other N. crassa peptidases. Peptidase II from N. crassa has been characterized as an aminopeptidase with activity toward various peptides, showing sensitivity to p-hydroxymercuribenzoate, suggesting the presence of essential sulfhydryl groups . Metal ions including Zn²⁺, Co²⁺, and Mn²⁺ strongly inhibited this peptidase, indicating it might be a metalloenzyme . For lap1, structural analysis should focus on identifying the active site residues, potential metal-binding sites, and substrate-binding pockets. Comparing the predicted structure with known aminopeptidase structures from other organisms can provide insights into conserved catalytic mechanisms. Site-directed mutagenesis of putative catalytic residues would confirm their role in enzyme function. Additionally, determination of the oligomeric state is important as many aminopeptidases function as multi-subunit complexes with specific arrangements necessary for activity.

How do pH and temperature affect recombinant lap1 stability and activity?

The stability and activity of recombinant lap1 likely exhibit significant dependence on pH and temperature conditions. Based on observations of other N. crassa peptidases, it's reasonable to expect that lap1 might be thermolabile, similar to peptidase II which was found to be unstable at 65°C . A comprehensive characterization of lap1 would include determining:

  • pH optimum and working range through activity assays across a broad pH spectrum (typically pH 4-10)

  • Temperature optimum and stability profile through:

    • Activity measurements at various temperatures

    • Thermal inactivation studies (measuring residual activity after pre-incubation at elevated temperatures)

    • Differential scanning fluorimetry to determine melting temperature

These parameters are essential for developing storage conditions and assay protocols. The information would also help in understanding the physiological role of lap1, as enzymes' pH and temperature optima often reflect their cellular localization and function. Researchers should establish these parameters early in their characterization work to ensure subsequent experiments are conducted under optimal conditions.

What cofactors and post-translational modifications are essential for optimal lap1 activity?

The activity of aminopeptidases, including lap1, often depends on specific cofactors and post-translational modifications. Based on studies of other N. crassa peptidases, lap1 might require metal ions for catalytic activity, as peptidase II showed strong inhibition by Zn²⁺, Co²⁺, and Mn²⁺ . Systematic evaluation of metal ion requirements should involve:

  • Metal depletion through dialysis against chelating agents

  • Activity restoration assays with various metal ions

  • Atomic absorption spectroscopy to identify tightly bound native metals

Post-translational modifications might include disulfide bond formation, glycosylation, or phosphorylation, which could affect folding, stability, or activity. Mass spectrometry analysis of purified native lap1 compared to recombinant versions would identify such modifications. If significant activity differences exist between native and recombinant enzyme, expression in systems capable of appropriate post-translational modifications (such as Pichia pastoris or insect cells) should be considered. Additionally, the potential role of proteolytic processing in activating lap1 should be investigated, as many peptidases are synthesized as inactive precursors.

How can recombinant N. crassa lap1 be utilized in studying protein degradation pathways?

Recombinant N. crassa lap1 serves as a valuable tool for investigating protein degradation pathways in fungal systems and beyond. Researchers can employ lap1 to study N-terminal processing of proteins and peptides, which is critical in controlling protein half-life according to the N-end rule. By comparing the action of lap1 with other aminopeptidases, researchers can elucidate the specificity and efficiency of different degradation pathways. In experimental approaches, isotopically labeled peptide substrates can be used with recombinant lap1 to monitor degradation kinetics using mass spectrometry. This allows precise determination of cleavage sites and preferences. Additionally, lap1 could be used in reconstituted in vitro systems to understand how aminopeptidases cooperate with other components of protein degradation machinery, such as proteasomes or autophagy-related proteins. These studies would help clarify the role of N-terminal processing in protein quality control mechanisms across eukaryotic systems.

What advantages does recombinant lap1 offer for enzyme evolution studies?

Recombinant N. crassa lap1 provides an excellent model system for enzyme evolution studies due to several advantages. First, N. crassa is a well-established genetic model organism with a fully sequenced genome and developed transformation systems . This facilitates the creation of mutations for structure-function studies. Second, the existence of multiple peptidases with overlapping specificities in N. crassa allows for comparative evolutionary studies to understand how gene duplication and functional divergence shaped the current peptidase repertoire. Researchers can employ directed evolution approaches to modify lap1 specificity or stability, using techniques such as error-prone PCR and DNA shuffling, followed by selection or screening for desired properties. The N. crassa genetic system allows relatively straightforward construction of strains with modified peptidases, as demonstrated by the successful creation of marked strains using homologous recombination at loci such as csr-1 . Furthermore, N. crassa's lifecycle features make it suitable for studying experimental evolution , enabling researchers to track how lap1 variants perform and evolve under different selective pressures over multiple generations.

How can lap1 be incorporated into studies of leucine metabolism and signaling pathways?

Leucine aminopeptidase 1 can serve as a valuable probe for investigating leucine metabolism and related signaling pathways in N. crassa. Leucine is not only a building block for proteins but also a signaling molecule that regulates various cellular processes, including protein synthesis and energy metabolism. By manipulating lap1 expression or activity, researchers can study how alterations in leucine availability affect downstream metabolic and signaling processes. This could involve:

  • Creating lap1 knockout or overexpression strains to observe effects on leucine-dependent pathways

  • Using recombinant lap1 to manipulate leucine levels in vitro and monitor effects on leucine-sensing components

  • Investigating interactions between lap1 and regulatory proteins involved in amino acid sensing

Additionally, researchers could explore potential connections between lap1 and stress response pathways, as Neurospora possesses sophisticated stress response mechanisms like the OS MAPK pathway . This could reveal whether lap1 activity is modulated during stress responses or whether leucine liberation by lap1 contributes to stress adaptation. Techniques such as co-immunoprecipitation, similar to those used to study WC-1 and NGF-1 interaction , could help identify lap1-interacting proteins that might connect it to broader cellular signaling networks.

How can researchers develop reliable activity assays for recombinant lap1?

Developing reliable activity assays for recombinant lap1 requires consideration of substrate specificity, detection methods, and assay conditions. Based on approaches used for other N. crassa peptidases, researchers can implement several complementary methods:

  • Chromogenic or fluorogenic substrate assays: Synthetic substrates like L-leucine-p-nitroanilide or L-leucine-AMC allow continuous monitoring of activity through spectrophotometric or fluorometric detection. These assays are suitable for high-throughput screening and kinetic studies.

  • HPLC-based peptide degradation assays: Natural peptide substrates can be incubated with lap1, and the reaction products separated by HPLC to quantify substrate disappearance and product formation rates. This approach provides information about substrate preference and cleavage patterns.

  • In-gel activity assays: Similar to the in situ staining procedure used for N. crassa peptidases in polyacrylamide gels , researchers can develop zymogram techniques specific for lap1 activity.

For all assays, careful optimization of buffer conditions, pH, temperature, and metal ion requirements is essential. Validation should include linearity with enzyme concentration, time-dependent activity, and reproducibility assessments. Additionally, specific inhibitors should be identified to confirm that the measured activity is indeed from lap1 rather than contaminating proteases.

What strategies can overcome expression yield limitations for recombinant lap1?

To overcome expression yield limitations for recombinant lap1, researchers should implement a multi-faceted optimization strategy. First, codon optimization for the expression host is crucial, as suboptimal codon usage can significantly reduce translation efficiency. Second, exploring different expression vectors with various promoter strengths and regulatory elements can identify optimal transcription conditions. Third, systematic optimization of expression parameters should include:

  • Induction conditions: Inducer concentration, induction timing, and duration

  • Growth conditions: Media composition, temperature, aeration rate

  • Host strain selection: Testing multiple strains with different genetic backgrounds

For challenging expressions, specialized approaches might be necessary. These include fusion to solubility-enhancing tags (as mentioned earlier), co-expression with molecular chaperones, or using cell-free expression systems. If intracellular accumulation is limited by toxicity, directing the protein to secretion or periplasmic space (in bacterial systems) may help. Additionally, researchers might draw inspiration from techniques used for other N. crassa proteins, such as the development of marked strains through homologous recombination , to create specialized expression hosts optimized for lap1 production.

How to address protein instability and aggregation during recombinant lap1 purification?

Addressing protein instability and aggregation during recombinant lap1 purification requires careful optimization of buffer conditions and handling procedures. Based on characteristics of other N. crassa peptidases, several strategies can be employed:

  • Buffer optimization:

    • Include appropriate reducing agents to protect putative essential sulfhydryl groups, as suggested by the sensitivity of peptidase II to p-hydroxymercuribenzoate

    • Test various metal ions that might stabilize the enzyme structure

    • Optimize pH based on stability rather than activity optima

    • Consider adding stabilizing agents like glycerol, sucrose, or specific amino acids

  • Temperature management:

    • Keep all purification steps at 4°C given the potential thermolability of lap1, similar to peptidase II which was unstable at 65°C

    • Avoid freeze-thaw cycles by aliquoting purified protein

  • Concentration considerations:

    • Use gentle concentration methods like dialysis against high molecular weight PEG rather than ultrafiltration when possible

    • Determine the critical concentration above which aggregation occurs

    • Consider adding non-ionic detergents at concentrations below their critical micelle concentration

  • Storage conditions:

    • Test various additives (glycerol, arginine, trehalose) for long-term storage

    • Compare stability at 4°C, -20°C, and -80°C with and without cryoprotectants

    • Evaluate lyophilization as a potential stabilization method

Through systematic testing of these variables, researchers can develop a purification protocol that maximizes both yield and stability of recombinant lap1.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.