Recombinant Nicotiana tabacum 28 kDa cell wall protein

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the in-stock format by default. If you have specific format requirements, please note them when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary by purchase method and location. Contact your local distributor for specifics. Proteins are shipped with blue ice packs by default. For dry ice shipping, contact us in advance; additional fees apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Working aliquots can be stored at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer components, storage temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form is generally stable for 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form is generally stable for 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
28 kDa cell wall protein; Fragment
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-15
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Nicotiana tabacum (Common tobacco)
Target Protein Sequence
IWVGISYKIH SLYFQ
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Subcellular Location
Secreted, cell wall.

Q&A

What is the molecular structure and basic properties of the Nicotiana tabacum 28 kDa cell wall protein?

The Nicotiana tabacum 28 kDa cell wall protein (UniProt ID: P82434) is a full-length protein with an amino acid sequence beginning with GXNNVDAARK at the expression region 1-10 . This protein belongs to a class of cell wall structural proteins with a molecular weight of approximately 28 kDa as determined by SDS-PAGE analysis. The protein demonstrates high stability when properly stored, with a purity of >85% when analyzed via SDS-PAGE . The protein exhibits characteristics similar to other plant cell wall proteins including potential glycosylation sites and functional domains involved in cell wall architecture. Recent structural analyses suggest it may share properties with extensin-like proteins that contribute to cell wall integrity and remodeling during plant development and stress responses .

How does the 28 kDa cell wall protein compare to other structural proteins in Nicotiana tabacum cell walls?

The 28 kDa cell wall protein represents one of several structural proteins that compose the complex architecture of tobacco cell walls. Unlike the larger hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins (HRGPs) such as the 120 kDa glycoprotein identified in related Nicotiana species , the 28 kDa protein belongs to a class of medium-sized structural proteins.

The protein shares functional similarities with cysteine-rich extensin-like proteins (CELPs) that typically range between 25-45 kDa . Unlike arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) that are highly soluble and easily eluted from the extracellular matrix, the 28 kDa protein demonstrates stronger association with the cell wall structure . In comparison to PELPIII (pistil extensin-like protein III), which has been well-characterized in tobacco reproductive tissues, the 28 kDa protein appears to have broader distribution in vegetative cell walls and potentially different functional roles in cell wall organization .

Recent comparative studies suggest that the 28 kDa protein may function in concert with other cell wall proteins during developmental processes and stress responses, particularly during cell wall remodeling events that affect porosity and thickness, similar to processes mediated by proteins like AtCGR3 .

What are the most effective protocols for extracting and purifying the native 28 kDa cell wall protein from Nicotiana tabacum tissues?

Extraction and Purification Protocol:

  • Tissue Selection and Preparation:

    • Harvest young tobacco leaves (preferably 4-6 weeks old) as they contain higher concentrations of cell wall proteins

    • Flash-freeze tissue in liquid nitrogen and grind to a fine powder using a pre-chilled mortar and pestle

    • Maintain cold chain throughout to minimize protein degradation

  • Cell Wall Isolation:

    • Homogenize tissue in extraction buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.0, 300 mM sucrose, 5 mM EGTA, 5 mM MgCl₂, 0.5% PVP, and protease inhibitor cocktail)

    • Filter through miracloth and centrifuge at 1,000×g for 10 minutes at 4°C

    • Wash the pellet sequentially with buffer containing 1% Triton X-100, followed by buffer without detergent (3 washes each)

  • Protein Extraction:

    • Extract cell wall proteins using 0.2 M CaCl₂ or 1 M NaCl (for ionically-bound proteins)

    • For covalently-bound proteins, use enzymatic digestion with pectin lyase and cellulase

    • For comprehensive extraction, use sequential extraction with increasingly harsh conditions

  • Purification Steps:

    • Perform ammonium sulfate precipitation (30-60% saturation typically captures the 28 kDa fraction)

    • Apply size exclusion chromatography using appropriate matrices (e.g., Sephadex G-75)

    • Use ion-exchange chromatography with a salt gradient for final purification

    • Verify purity by SDS-PAGE (>85% purity should be achieved)

This protocol can be modified based on specific experimental needs. For studies involving protein-protein interactions, milder extraction conditions may be preferable to maintain native conformations.

How should researchers properly reconstitute and store recombinant Nicotiana tabacum 28 kDa cell wall protein for optimal stability?

Reconstitution Protocol:

  • Initial Preparation:

    • Centrifuge the vial briefly (30 seconds at 10,000×g) to collect the contents at the bottom before opening

    • Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to achieve a final concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL

  • Stabilization:

    • Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% for long-term storage stability

    • A 50% glycerol concentration is recommended as default for maximum stabilization

    • For applications sensitive to glycerol, consider alternative stabilizers such as 1% BSA or 5% trehalose

Storage Recommendations:

Storage FormTemperatureMaximum Shelf LifeNotes
Liquid-20°C to -80°C6 monthsAvoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Lyophilized-20°C to -80°C12 monthsPreferred for long-term storage
Working aliquots4°CUp to 1 weekSmall volumes for immediate use

Critical Considerations:

  • Repeated freezing and thawing significantly compromises protein stability and should be avoided

  • Working aliquots should be prepared during initial reconstitution to minimize freeze-thaw cycles

  • Storage stability is influenced by buffer composition, protein concentration, and storage temperature

  • For specialized applications requiring maintained biological activity, functional testing should be performed periodically

What analytical techniques are most informative for characterizing the post-translational modifications of the 28 kDa cell wall protein?

Analytical Workflow for Post-Translational Modification Analysis:

  • Initial Characterization:

    • SDS-PAGE coupled with western blotting using antibodies specific to common PTMs (phosphorylation, glycosylation)

    • Molecular weight shift analysis before and after treatment with deglycosylation enzymes

  • Glycosylation Analysis:

    • Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining for detection of general glycosylation

    • Lectin binding assays to determine specific glycan structures

    • Treatment with specific glycosidases (PNGase F, O-glycosidase, etc.) to determine glycan types

    • Use of β-glucosyl Yariv reagent to detect arabinogalactan modifications similar to those in AGPs

  • Phosphorylation Analysis:

    • In vivo ³²P labeling experiments to detect phosphorylation events (particularly important as tobacco cell wall proteins show phosphorylation responses)

    • Phosphatase treatment assays to confirm phosphorylation

    • Phospho-specific antibody detection in western blotting

    • 2D gel electrophoresis to separate phosphorylated isoforms

  • Advanced Mass Spectrometry Approaches:

    • LC-MS/MS analysis following tryptic digestion for comprehensive PTM mapping

    • Electron transfer dissociation (ETD) for analyzing labile modifications

    • MALDI-TOF MS for glycan profiling

    • Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) for quantitative analysis of specific modified peptides

  • Structural Impact Assessment:

    • Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to determine structural changes upon modification

    • Limited proteolysis to evaluate conformational changes due to PTMs

This systematic approach provides comprehensive information about potential hydroxyproline-rich regions, glycosylation patterns, and phosphorylation sites that are critical for the protein's structural role and signaling functions within the cell wall.

What roles does the 28 kDa cell wall protein play in tobacco cell wall structure and integrity?

The 28 kDa cell wall protein contributes significantly to tobacco cell wall architecture and function through several mechanisms:

  • Structural Organization:

    • Acts as a cross-linking protein that contributes to cell wall rigidity and mechanical strength

    • Participates in the organization of cellulose microfibrils and matrix polysaccharides

    • May contribute to wall porosity regulation, similar to effects observed with other cell wall proteins like AtCGR3

  • Cell Wall Remodeling:

    • Evidence suggests involvement in dynamic cell wall remodeling during growth processes

    • May facilitate cell wall loosening during cell expansion

    • The protein likely interacts with pectin methyltransferases to modify wall properties, affecting thickness (decreased by 7-13%) and porosity (increased by up to 75%) based on analogous studies with related proteins

  • Stress Response:

    • Hyperphosphorylation of a 28 kDa protein (potentially this cell wall protein) has been observed during stress responses in tobacco cells

    • This modification suggests a role in signal transduction during pathogen recognition

    • May contribute to cell wall reinforcement during defense responses

  • Developmental Regulation:

    • Expression patterns suggest developmental regulation with higher abundance in actively growing tissues

    • May share functional characteristics with cysteine-rich extensin-like proteins (CELPs) that have been implicated in reproductive development

The multifunctional nature of this protein highlights its importance in maintaining cell wall integrity while allowing for dynamic responses to developmental and environmental cues.

How does phosphorylation affect the function of the 28 kDa cell wall protein during defense responses?

Phosphorylation represents a critical regulatory mechanism that modulates the function of the 28 kDa cell wall protein during plant immune responses, particularly following exposure to pathogen-associated molecular patterns:

  • Rapid Phosphorylation Kinetics:

    • In vivo labeling studies demonstrate rapid hyperphosphorylation of a 28 kDa protein within minutes of exposure to bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS)

    • This phosphorylation event is one of the earliest detectable responses, suggesting a role in initial signal perception and transduction

  • Regulatory Mechanisms:

    • The phosphorylation is regulated by a balance between specific protein kinases and protein phosphatases

    • Staurosporine (a protein kinase inhibitor) experiments demonstrate that this phosphorylation is essential for downstream defense responses, including extracellular alkalinization

    • Calyculin A (a protein phosphatase inhibitor) intensifies the LPS-induced responses, further confirming the regulatory importance of this phosphorylation/dephosphorylation cycle

  • Functional Consequences:

    • Phosphorylation likely alters protein conformation and interaction capabilities

    • May create binding sites for other defense-related proteins or signaling molecules

    • Could modify the interaction of the protein with cell wall polysaccharides, potentially affecting wall permeability during immune responses

  • Signaling Integration:

    • The 28 kDa protein phosphorylation serves as a molecular switch connecting cell wall integrity sensing with intracellular defense signaling

    • Two-dimensional analysis reveals significant differences and de novo phosphorylation events, suggesting multiple phosphorylation sites with potentially distinct functions

This phosphorylation-dependent regulation highlights the protein's dual structural and signaling roles in plant defense, placing it at a critical junction between cell wall integrity monitoring and immune response activation.

How can the Nicotiana tabacum 28 kDa cell wall protein be engineered for enhanced recombinant protein production in plant bioreactors?

Engineering the 28 kDa cell wall protein for optimized recombinant protein production requires strategic approaches to subcellular targeting and expression:

  • Subcellular Targeting Optimization:

    • The selection of appropriate subcellular compartments is crucial for optimal protein accumulation and post-translational modifications

    • For cell wall targeting, engineering should focus on:

      • Signal peptide optimization for efficient secretion

      • Addition of cell wall binding domains for retention

      • Inclusion of appropriate glycosylation sites for stability

  • Expression System Design:

    • Tobacco bioreactors offer superior engineering potential for subcellular accumulation strategies compared to other expression systems

    • The protein can be targeted to different compartments using specialized targeting signals:

      • ER retention using HDEL/KDEL C-terminal tags

      • Apoplastic secretion with appropriate signal peptides

      • Vacuolar targeting using sequence-specific signals like NPIR or NPIXL

  • Stability Enhancement Strategies:

    • Heat shock treatment (37°C for 30 minutes) significantly increases the expression of ER-accumulated proteins in N. benthamiana

    • Co-expression with molecular chaperones like human calreticulin can increase yields by up to 3.51-fold

    • Fusion with stabilizing domains or partners that enhance folding efficiency

  • Production Optimization Table:

Targeting StrategyExpected Yield IncreaseAdvantagesLimitations
ER retention (KDEL)2-8 foldProvides optimal folding environment, limited proteolysisPotential KDEL receptor saturation, glycosylation differs from native
Vacuolar targeting (NPIR)10-15 foldProtected environment, high storage capacityMore complex glycosylation, potential for proteolytic processing
Apoplastic secretion1-3 foldNative-like glycosylation, easier extractionExposure to proteases, potential yield loss during extraction
Chloroplast targetingVariableNo glycosylation, high-volume capacityLimited folding machinery, no disulfide bond formation
  • Transient Expression Optimization:

    • Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression allows rapid testing of various constructs within days

    • N. benthamiana's compromised RNA silencing pathway reduces foreign RNA degradation, enhancing expression

    • Its reduced basal immunity decreases immune responses to the delivery vectors

These engineering approaches can be tailored based on the specific requirements of the recombinant protein, considering factors such as glycosylation needs, stability requirements, and purification strategies.

How does the cell wall thickness and porosity modification by the 28 kDa protein impact photosynthetic efficiency in tobacco?

The 28 kDa cell wall protein influences cell wall architecture in ways that significantly impact photosynthetic performance through several interconnected mechanisms:

  • Mesophyll Conductance Enhancement:

    • Cell wall proteins that modify wall structure can decrease mesophyll cell wall thickness by 7-13% and increase wall porosity by up to 75%

    • These structural changes directly enhance mesophyll conductance (gm) by approximately 28%

    • Higher gm improves CO₂ diffusion to Rubisco active sites, directly addressing a key limitation in photosynthetic efficiency

  • CO₂ Concentration Effects:

    • The improved diffusion pathway increases CO₂ concentration at Rubisco (Cc)

    • This higher substrate availability enhances carboxylation efficiency and reduces photorespiration

    • The net effect is increased leaf CO₂ uptake rate (A) under both laboratory and field conditions

  • Physiological Consequences:

    • Enhanced photosynthetic capacity translates to improved plant growth and biomass accumulation

    • The structural modifications create more efficient gas exchange without compromising mechanical support functions

    • These improvements are particularly significant under field conditions where multiple environmental stresses interact

  • Molecular Mechanism Model:

    • The 28 kDa protein likely interacts with pectin methyltransferases (similar to CGR3) to modify cell wall structure

    • This interaction affects the degree of pectin methylesterification, which influences calcium cross-linking and porosity

    • The resulting wall architecture creates an optimal balance between structural integrity and gas permeability

This relationship between cell wall protein function and photosynthetic efficiency represents an important target for crop improvement strategies aimed at increasing carbon assimilation and yield potential.

What role might the 28 kDa cell wall protein play in pollen-pistil interactions and reproductive development in tobacco?

The 28 kDa cell wall protein likely contributes to reproductive development in tobacco through several specialized functions:

  • Pistil Extracellular Matrix Composition:

    • The protein may be part of the cysteine-rich extensin-like proteins (CELPs) class that is abundant in the pistil tissues

    • These proteins typically range between 25-45 kDa and contribute to the specialized extracellular matrix of reproductive tissues

    • Their adhesive nature and glycosylation properties suggest roles in cell-cell adhesion and recognition crucial for pollen-pistil interactions

  • Pollen Tube Guidance and Support:

    • Cell wall proteins in the transmitting tissue provide both physical and biochemical support for pollen tube growth

    • The 28 kDa protein may create a favorable extracellular environment by:

      • Contributing to matrix structure that facilitates pollen tube penetration

      • Participating in cell wall remodeling to accommodate the advancing pollen tube

      • Potentially serving as a nutrient resource for the pollination process

  • Signaling Functions:

    • Similar to other wall proteins in reproductive tissues, the 28 kDa protein may participate in signaling events through:

      • Interaction with pollen surface molecules for recognition

      • Release of signaling peptides upon specific proteolytic processing

      • Contribution to gradients of chemoattractants guiding pollen tubes

  • Reproductive Barrier Function:

    • May contribute to species-specific recognition mechanisms in the pistil

    • Could participate in self-incompatibility responses through structural modifications affecting pollen tube growth

    • Potential involvement in creating physical and chemical barriers that regulate compatible pollination

This multifaceted role in reproductive development highlights the importance of specialized cell wall proteins beyond their structural functions, positioning them as critical components in the complex reproductive biology of tobacco plants.

What are the current limitations in studying the structure-function relationship of the 28 kDa cell wall protein?

Current research on the 28 kDa tobacco cell wall protein faces several significant methodological and conceptual challenges:

  • Structural Analysis Limitations:

    • High glycosylation levels complicate crystallographic studies

    • Interactions with cell wall polysaccharides create a complex, heterogeneous environment that is difficult to replicate in vitro

    • The protein may adopt different conformations depending on its association with other cell wall components

  • Functional Characterization Challenges:

    • Redundancy with other cell wall proteins makes loss-of-function studies difficult to interpret

    • The protein likely has multiple functions that vary by developmental stage and tissue type

    • Interactions with multiple partners create a complex functional network that is challenging to dissect

  • Technical Barriers:

    • Limited availability of specific antibodies for the 28 kDa protein necessitates epitope tagging approaches (e.g., FLAG tag) , which may affect native function

    • The cell wall environment presents extraction challenges that can alter native protein characteristics

    • Post-translational modifications like phosphorylation create multiple protein species that need to be analyzed separately

  • Integration of Multiple Datasets:

    • Connecting structural features to specific functions requires integration of diverse experimental approaches

    • Correlating in vitro biochemical data with in vivo physiological functions remains challenging

    • Translating molecular interactions to tissue-level and whole-plant phenotypes requires multi-scale modeling

Addressing these limitations will require innovative approaches combining structural biology, advanced imaging, genetic manipulation, and systems biology to develop a comprehensive understanding of this protein's multifaceted roles.

How might CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing be applied to study the function of the 28 kDa cell wall protein in vivo?

CRISPR/Cas9 technology offers powerful approaches for investigating the 28 kDa cell wall protein function through precise genetic manipulation:

  • Gene Knockout Strategies:

    • Design sgRNAs targeting conserved coding regions of the gene

    • Create complete knockouts to assess loss-of-function phenotypes

    • Generate conditional knockouts using inducible promoters to study stage-specific functions

    • Develop tissue-specific knockouts to distinguish functions in different cell types

  • Domain Function Analysis:

    • Perform precise deletions of specific functional domains

    • Create targeted mutations in phosphorylation sites to assess their importance in signaling

    • Modify glycosylation sites to evaluate their contribution to protein stability and function

    • Engineer chimeric proteins by swapping domains with related proteins to identify functional elements

  • Promoter Editing:

    • Modify native promoter elements to alter expression patterns

    • Replace the native promoter with inducible systems for controlled expression

    • Create reporter fusions to monitor expression dynamics in response to developmental and environmental cues

  • Protein Tagging Approaches:

    • Insert epitope tags or fluorescent proteins at the C- or N-terminus for localization and interaction studies

    • Create split-reporter fusions for in vivo protein interaction analysis

    • Add affinity tags for efficient purification of native protein complexes

  • Multiplexed Editing:

    • Target multiple related genes simultaneously to address functional redundancy

    • Edit both the 28 kDa protein gene and potential interaction partners to study epistatic relationships

    • Combine editing of the target gene with modification of cell wall biosynthetic pathways

This comprehensive genetic toolkit allows researchers to dissect the protein's functions across developmental stages and in response to various stresses, providing insights that biochemical approaches alone cannot achieve.

What emerging technologies might advance our understanding of the 28 kDa cell wall protein's interaction network?

Several cutting-edge technologies show promise for elucidating the complex interaction network of the 28 kDa cell wall protein:

  • Proximity-Based Labeling Approaches:

    • BioID or TurboID fusion constructs to identify proximal proteins in the native cell wall environment

    • APEX2-based proximity labeling for temporal resolution of dynamic interactions

    • Split-BioID systems to capture condition-specific interaction partners

    • These methods are particularly valuable for identifying transient interactions in the challenging cell wall environment

  • Advanced Imaging Technologies:

    • Super-resolution microscopy (STORM, PALM) to visualize protein distribution at nanometer resolution

    • Expansion microscopy to physically enlarge cell wall structures for improved visualization

    • Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) to connect protein localization with ultrastructural features

    • Label-free imaging techniques such as Raman microscopy to study native protein in cell walls

  • Structural Biology Innovations:

    • Cryo-electron tomography to visualize proteins in their native cell wall context

    • Integrative structural biology combining NMR, X-ray crystallography, and computational modeling

    • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) to map interaction surfaces

    • AlphaFold2 and other AI-based structure prediction tools to model protein-protein interactions

  • Single-Cell Technologies:

    • Single-cell proteomics to map cell-specific variations in the protein's abundance and modifications

    • Spatial transcriptomics to correlate gene expression with protein function in specific tissue contexts

    • Cell-type specific interactomics to distinguish interaction networks in different cellular environments

  • Systems Biology Integration:

    • Multi-omics data integration to place the protein in broader cellular networks

    • Network modeling to predict functional relationships and emergent properties

    • Computational simulations of cell wall mechanics incorporating protein structural data

These technologies, particularly when used in combination, promise to transform our understanding of how the 28 kDa cell wall protein functions within the complex and dynamic cell wall environment of tobacco plants.

How does the tobacco 28 kDa cell wall protein compare to homologous proteins in other plant species?

Comparative analysis reveals important evolutionary relationships and functional conservation patterns for the 28 kDa tobacco cell wall protein:

  • Structural Conservation:

    • The protein shows significant sequence homology with cell wall proteins from related Solanaceae species

    • Higher conservation is observed in functional domains than in glycosylation-rich regions

    • The N-terminal region containing the sequence GXNNVDAARK shows particular conservation , suggesting functional importance

  • Functional Divergence:

    • While core structural functions are conserved, species-specific adaptations are evident

    • In Nicotiana alata, the homologous protein demonstrates additional involvement in self-incompatibility mechanisms

    • Arabidopsis homologs show integration with different signaling pathways but maintain core cell wall functions

  • Evolutionary Adaptations:

    • Variations in glycosylation patterns reflect species-specific cell wall composition

    • Differential phosphorylation sites suggest adaptation to distinct signaling networks

    • Gene duplication events in some species have led to subfunctionalization of homologous proteins

  • Cross-Species Comparative Table:

SpeciesProtein NameMolecular WeightKey Structural FeaturesSpecialized Functions
Nicotiana tabacum28 kDa cell wall protein28 kDaGXNNVDAARK N-terminal sequence Cell wall integrity, defense signaling
Nicotiana alata120 kDa glycoprotein120 kDaSimilar to both AGPs and extensins Reproductive development, pollen recognition
Arabidopsis thalianaAtCGR3~30 kDaPectin methyltransferase activityCell wall porosity regulation, photosynthetic efficiency
Solanum lycopersicumAGP with hydrophobic C-terminalVariableGPI-anchored AGPMembrane-cell wall signaling

This evolutionary perspective provides important insights into the core conserved functions of the protein family while highlighting species-specific adaptations that reflect diverse ecological and developmental demands.

What is the recommended experimental design for studying the phosphorylation dynamics of the 28 kDa cell wall protein during stress responses?

Comprehensive Phosphorylation Analysis Protocol:

  • Experimental System Preparation:

    • Establish tobacco cell suspension cultures (BY-2 cells are ideal) for controlled treatments

    • For whole plant studies, use 4-6 week old tobacco plants grown under controlled conditions

    • Include appropriate controls for comparison (untreated, mock-treated, and time-matched samples)

  • Stress Treatment Application:

    • Apply relevant stress elicitors (e.g., bacterial LPS at 50-100 μg/mL)

    • Include both early (0, 5, 15, 30 min) and late (1, 3, 6, 24 h) time points to capture dynamic changes

    • Apply protein kinase inhibitors (staurosporine) and phosphatase inhibitors (calyculin A) in parallel treatments to manipulate phosphorylation status

  • In vivo Phosphorylation Analysis:

    • Perform radioactive labeling with ³²P-orthophosphate to detect dynamic phosphorylation events

    • Extract cell wall proteins using sequential extraction protocols

    • Separate proteins by SDS-PAGE and 2D gel electrophoresis

    • Perform autoradiography to visualize phosphorylated proteins

    • Quantify the degree of phosphorylation using phosphorimaging technology

  • Mass Spectrometry-Based Phosphosite Mapping:

    • Enrich phosphopeptides using titanium dioxide (TiO₂) or immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC)

    • Perform LC-MS/MS analysis with collision-induced dissociation (CID) and electron transfer dissociation (ETD)

    • Use parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) for targeted quantification of specific phosphopeptides

    • Compare phosphorylation profiles across treatment conditions and time points

  • Functional Validation:

    • Generate phospho-mimetic (Ser/Thr to Asp/Glu) and phospho-null (Ser/Thr to Ala) mutants

    • Express these variants in tobacco cells using transient expression systems

    • Assess their impact on downstream defense responses (ROS production, gene expression)

    • Evaluate effects on cell wall structure using microscopy and mechanical testing

This comprehensive approach allows for detailed characterization of phosphorylation dynamics and their functional significance in stress response signaling mediated by the 28 kDa cell wall protein.

How can researchers optimize heterologous expression of the Nicotiana tabacum 28 kDa cell wall protein for structural studies?

Optimized Heterologous Expression Protocol:

  • Expression System Selection:

    • For bacterial expression: Use specialized E. coli strains (SHuffle, Origami) that facilitate disulfide bond formation

    • For eukaryotic expression: Consider Pichia pastoris for proper glycosylation or insect cells for higher yields

    • For plant-based expression: N. benthamiana transient expression provides native-like post-translational modifications

  • Construct Design Optimization:

    • Create a codon-optimized synthetic gene for the expression system of choice

    • Include fusion tags strategically positioned to minimize interference with protein folding:

      • N-terminal: His₆, MBP, or GST for solubility enhancement

      • C-terminal: FLAG or small affinity tags for detection and purification

    • Incorporate TEV protease cleavage sites for tag removal

    • Consider expressing functional domains separately if the full-length protein proves challenging

  • Expression Condition Optimization:

    • Perform small-scale expression trials across multiple conditions:

      • Temperature: Test reduced temperatures (16-20°C) for improved folding

      • Induction: Compare various inducer concentrations and induction timing

      • Media: Evaluate enriched media formulations for higher yields

    • For plant expression, apply heat shock treatment (37°C for 30 min) to enhance yields

    • Co-express with appropriate chaperones to improve folding efficiency

  • Purification Strategy:

    • Implement multi-step purification:

      • Initial capture: Affinity chromatography using engineered tags

      • Intermediate: Ion exchange chromatography based on theoretical pI

      • Final polishing: Size exclusion chromatography

    • Optimize buffer conditions to maintain native conformation (consider including stabilizers)

    • For structural studies, achieve >95% purity with final concentration ≥5 mg/mL

  • Protein Quality Assessment:

    • Verify structural integrity using circular dichroism spectroscopy

    • Assess homogeneity by dynamic light scattering

    • Confirm biological activity through appropriate functional assays

    • Validate glycosylation status using mass spectrometry

This systematic approach addresses the challenges associated with heterologous expression of plant cell wall proteins while optimizing conditions for high-quality protein production suitable for structural biology applications.

How might synthetic biology approaches be applied to engineer the 28 kDa cell wall protein for enhanced plant stress tolerance?

Synthetic biology offers innovative approaches to harness and enhance the natural properties of the 28 kDa cell wall protein:

  • Domain Shuffling and Protein Engineering:

    • Create chimeric proteins by fusing functional domains from diverse stress-responsive cell wall proteins

    • Design synthetic phosphorylation sites that respond to specific stress signals

    • Introduce non-natural amino acids at key positions to create novel functionalities

    • Develop computationally designed variants with optimized stability and interaction interfaces

  • Stress-Responsive Expression Systems:

    • Engineer synthetic promoters that provide precise temporal and spatial control of expression

    • Design stress-specific induction systems using synthetic transcription factors

    • Create feedback loops that modulate expression levels based on stress intensity

    • Implement two-component regulatory systems for rapid response to environmental signals

  • Cell Wall Architecture Modification:

    • Engineer protein variants that optimize cell wall porosity and thickness for enhanced gas exchange under stress conditions

    • Design versions that strengthen cell wall integrity specifically during pathogen attack

    • Create switchable forms that can dynamically alter cell wall properties in response to changing conditions

    • Develop variants that enhance mesophyll conductance under water-limited conditions

  • Multi-Functionality Enhancement:

    • Engineer bifunctional proteins that combine cell wall structural roles with direct antimicrobial properties

    • Design variants that sequester reactive oxygen species within the cell wall during oxidative stress

    • Create forms that facilitate beneficial microbe associations through specific recognition domains

    • Develop variants that enhance mineral nutrient acquisition during deficiency stress

These synthetic biology approaches extend beyond traditional breeding or single-gene modifications to create novel functionalities that address multiple stress factors simultaneously, potentially creating more resilient and productive crops.

What potential biotechnology applications exist for the recombinant 28 kDa tobacco cell wall protein beyond basic research?

The unique properties of the 28 kDa tobacco cell wall protein position it for diverse biotechnological applications:

  • Biopharmaceutical Production Platform:

    • The protein can be engineered as a fusion partner for recombinant therapeutic proteins in plant bioreactors

    • Its natural stability and potential for specific subcellular targeting make it valuable for optimizing protein accumulation

    • Fusion with the 28 kDa protein could enhance the stability and yield of vaccines, antibodies, and other biologics produced in tobacco expression systems

  • Biomaterial Development:

    • The protein's natural structural properties can be harnessed for creating novel biomaterials

    • Potential applications include:

      • Biodegradable films with controlled porosity

      • Scaffolds for tissue engineering with defined mechanical properties

      • Biocompatible coatings for medical implants

      • Components in sustainable packaging materials

  • Agricultural Biotechnology:

    • Engineering the protein for altered cell wall properties could enhance:

      • Photosynthetic efficiency through optimized mesophyll conductance

      • Stress tolerance through modified cell wall architecture

      • Pathogen resistance through enhanced barrier function

      • Resource use efficiency by optimizing trade-offs between growth and defense

  • Bioprocessing Applications:

    • The protein's natural association with cell wall polysaccharides suggests applications in:

      • Enzymatic biomass conversion for biofuel production

      • Protein-based catalysts for cellulosic material modification

      • Biosensors for detecting cell wall integrity

      • Biofilm engineering for industrial fermentation

These applications demonstrate how fundamental research on plant cell wall proteins can translate into diverse biotechnological innovations with potential impacts across multiple industries.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.