Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized fulfillment.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notification and incurs additional charges.
The tag type is determined during production. To request a specific tag, please specify it in your order; we will prioritize fulfilling such requests.
Binds to the 23S rRNA.
KEGG: neu:NE0420
STRING: 228410.NE0420
L15 is a 15 kDa protein of the large ribosomal subunit that plays a crucial structural and functional role in the 50S ribosomal assembly. Based on studies in other bacterial systems, L15 interacts with over ten other proteins during 50S assembly in vitro and contributes to the stabilization of ribosomal RNA tertiary structure . In N. europaea specifically, L15 likely maintains ribosomal integrity essential for protein synthesis during various metabolic states, including during the oxygen-limited conditions that this ammonia-oxidizing bacterium frequently encounters in its environmental niches .
The protein participates in the latter stages of 50S subunit assembly, helping to organize rRNA elements that are dispersed in the secondary structure. Chemical footprinting studies have shown that L15 has a strong interaction with the region spanning nucleotides 572-654 in domain II of 23S rRNA, and also interacts with specific regions of domains I, IV, and V . These multiple interaction points indicate L15's importance in maintaining the three-dimensional architecture of the ribosome.
L15 serves as a critical architectural component during ribosome biogenesis. Chemical footprinting experiments demonstrate that L15 has a strong footprint in domain II of 23S rRNA (nucleotides 572-654), but this footprint cannot be detected when L15 is incubated with "naked" 23S rRNA . This indicates that the formation of the L15 binding site requires a partially assembled particle, placing L15's incorporation at a specific point in the assembly pathway.
The three-dimensional environment of L15 within the ribosome can be characterized using protein-tethered hydroxyl radical probing. By creating L15 mutants with single cysteine residues at specific positions (such as amino acids 68, 71, and 115) and derivatizing them with 1-[p-(bromo-acetamido)benzyl]-EDTA-Fe(II), researchers can map the proximity of L15 to various rRNA elements . This approach reveals that L15 is positioned near several 23S rRNA elements that are dispersed in the secondary structure, providing important constraints on the tertiary folding of 23S rRNA and highlighting L15's role as a structural organizer.
For successful expression of recombinant N. europaea L15, Escherichia coli-based expression systems have proven most effective when optimized appropriately. Based on similar recombinant protein expression studies, several key considerations should guide your experimental design:
Expression vector selection:
Vectors containing T7 promoters provide controlled, high-level expression
Including fusion tags can significantly enhance both expression and solubility
The use of solubility-enhancing tags such as maltose-binding protein (MBP) is particularly valuable for ribosomal proteins that may have charged surfaces
Fusion tag optimization:
E. coli expression trials with various fusion proteins have shown:
| Fusion Tag | Relative Solubility | Purification Method | Additional Benefits |
|---|---|---|---|
| His6-tag | Moderate | Ni²⁺-IMAC | Simple, small tag |
| His6-MBP | High | Ni²⁺-IMAC & amylose | Enhanced solubility |
| HE-MBP(Pyr) | Very high | Metal affinity chromatography | Highest soluble expression |
| CusF | High | Cu²⁺-IMAC | Higher fluorescence than MBP/GST |
The truncated maltotriose-binding protein (MBP) from Pyrococcus furiosus (residues 59-433) has shown particular promise as a solubility-enhancing tag when combined with a modified histidine tag (HE) . For optimal results, include a tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease recognition site between the tag and L15 to facilitate tag removal.
Purification of recombinant L15 requires careful consideration of buffer conditions and purification strategies to maintain the protein's native structure. A multi-step purification approach is recommended:
Initial capture by immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC):
For His-tagged constructs, use Ni²⁺-charged resins with imidazole gradients (20-250 mM)
For CusF-tagged constructs, Cu²⁺-charged resins have shown excellent results
Include reducing agents (1-5 mM DTT or 2-10 mM β-mercaptoethanol) to prevent oxidation
Buffer optimization:
Since L15 naturally interacts with RNA, consider adding the following stabilizers:
Moderate ionic strength (150-300 mM NaCl) to minimize non-specific interactions
Glycerol (5-10%) to enhance stability during concentration steps
Low concentrations of Mg²⁺ (1-5 mM) to mimic the ribosomal environment
Tag removal considerations:
The dipeptidyl aminopeptidase 1 (DAP-1) system has shown complete removal of specific tags within 4-12 hours under mild conditions
For TEV protease cleavage, optimize conditions (enzyme:substrate ratio, temperature, time) based on fusion construct design
After cleavage, perform reverse IMAC to separate the cleaved protein from the tag and uncut fusion protein
Final polishing:
Size exclusion chromatography to ensure homogeneity and remove aggregates
Quality assessment by SDS-PAGE, mass spectrometry, and dynamic light scattering
When designing your purification strategy, remember that L15's natural binding partners include rRNA and other ribosomal proteins. Therefore, RNase treatment during lysis may be necessary to prevent co-purification of E. coli RNA, which could affect downstream applications.
Verifying the native conformation and activity of purified recombinant L15 requires multiple complementary approaches:
Structural integrity assessment:
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to analyze secondary structure content
Thermal shift assays to determine stability and proper folding
Size exclusion chromatography with multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS) to confirm the monomeric state and detect any oligomerization
Functional assessment through RNA binding studies:
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) with the 23S rRNA domain II fragment (nucleotides 572-654)
Chemical footprinting using Fe(II)·EDTA and dimethyl sulfate to verify protection of expected 23S rRNA regions
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) to measure binding affinity and thermodynamic parameters
In vitro reconstitution activity:
L15's primary function is in ribosome assembly, so the gold standard for functional assessment is its ability to incorporate into 50S subunits. This can be tested by:
Reconstituting core particles derived from N. europaea or E. coli 50S subunits (by treatment with 2M LiCl)
Analyzing reconstituted particles by sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation
Confirming L15 incorporation by western blotting and mass spectrometry analysis
A critical observation from previous research is that L15's binding site cannot be detected when incubated with "naked" 23S rRNA, indicating that formation of the L15 binding site requires a partially assembled particle . Therefore, binding assays should ideally use partially reconstituted core particles rather than isolated rRNA.
Mapping the precise interactions between L15 and 23S rRNA requires specialized techniques that can provide atomic or near-atomic resolution data. Based on established methodologies, the following approaches are most effective:
Chemical footprinting:
This approach identifies RNA regions protected by protein binding:
Reconstitute purified recombinant L15 with core particles derived from N. europaea 50S subunits
Expose the complexes to chemical probes such as Fe(II)·EDTA and dimethyl sulfate
Analyze the modification patterns by primer extension or next-generation sequencing
Compare patterns with and without L15 to identify protected regions
Previous studies using this approach identified a strong footprint for L15 in the region spanning nucleotides 572-654 in domain II of 23S rRNA .
Protein-tethered hydroxyl radical probing:
This technique provides detailed information about the three-dimensional environment of L15:
Create L15 mutants with single cysteine residues at specific positions (e.g., amino acids 68, 71, and 115)
Derivatize these mutants with 1-[p-(bromo-acetamido)benzyl]-EDTA·Fe(II)
Reconstitute with core particles and initiate hydroxyl radical cleavage
Map the RNA cleavage sites by primer extension or sequencing
This approach has revealed cleavages not only in domain II but also in specific regions of domains I, IV, and V of 23S rRNA, indicating the proximity of these rRNA regions to one another and providing constraints on the tertiary folding of 23S rRNA .
Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM):
For a comprehensive structural view, cryo-EM provides near-atomic resolution of the entire ribosomal complex:
Reconstitute 50S subunits with recombinant L15
Prepare vitrified samples for cryo-EM analysis
Collect and process images to generate 3D reconstructions
Build atomic models that reveal the positioning of L15 within the ribosomal context
Site-directed mutagenesis offers a powerful approach to probe the functional importance of specific residues in L15. A systematic mutagenesis strategy should target residues in key regions:
Experimental design strategy:
Identify critical residues based on:
Create single-point mutations using PCR-based mutagenesis approaches:
Conservative substitutions (e.g., Lys→Arg) to test charge importance
Non-conservative substitutions (e.g., Lys→Ala) to eliminate side chain functionality
Introduce cysteine residues at positions of interest for subsequent hydroxyl radical probing
Assess mutant effects through multiple functional assays:
| Mutation Type | Binding Assay | Assembly Assay | Structural Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conserved residues | EMSA with rRNA fragments | In vitro reconstitution | CD spectroscopy |
| Interface residues | Chemical footprinting | Sucrose gradient analysis | Thermal stability |
| Domain mutations | SPR or ITC | Partial reconstitution | Limited proteolysis |
Interpret results in structural context:
Map mutations onto 3D models derived from cryo-EM or homology modeling
Correlate functional defects with structural perturbations
Identify networks of interactions that contribute to ribosome assembly
This approach can reveal which aspects of L15 structure are essential for its role in ribosome assembly and which might be adaptable, providing insights into both universal features of ribosome assembly and any specific adaptations in N. europaea.
Comparing L15 from N. europaea with homologs from other bacteria provides insights into both conserved functional elements and species-specific adaptations. A comprehensive comparison should include:
Sequence conservation analysis:
While the search results don't provide specific sequence data for N. europaea L15, ribosomal proteins are generally highly conserved due to their fundamental roles. Key comparisons should include:
Alignment with model organisms (E. coli, B. subtilis) to identify core conserved regions
Comparison with other ammonia-oxidizing bacteria to identify niche-specific adaptations
Identification of N. europaea-specific insertions or deletions that might influence function
Structural comparison:
Using available structural data or homology models:
Map conserved residues onto 3D structures to identify functionally critical regions
Analyze surface properties (electrostatic potential, hydrophobicity) that might influence rRNA binding
Examine any structural features unique to N. europaea that might relate to its ecological niche
Functional conservation:
Experimental approaches to compare functional properties:
Express recombinant L15 proteins from different species and compare biochemical properties
Test cross-species complementation in reconstitution assays
Measure binding affinities to conserved rRNA regions using ITC or SPR
These comparative analyses can reveal how L15 has evolved in N. europaea to support its specialized metabolism as an ammonia-oxidizing bacterium, potentially including adaptations related to oxygen limitation or other environmental factors relevant to its ecological niche .
N. europaea encounters various environmental stressors in its natural habitats, including oxygen limitation, which significantly affects its metabolism . Recombinant L15 provides a valuable tool for investigating how these stressors impact ribosome function:
Experimental approaches:
Stress-specific modification analysis:
Purify ribosomes from N. europaea grown under different stress conditions (oxygen limitation, ammonia starvation, pH stress)
Extract and analyze L15 by mass spectrometry to identify stress-induced post-translational modifications
Create recombinant L15 variants mimicking these modifications to test their functional impact
Ribosome heterogeneity assessment:
Use recombinant tagged L15 to purify intact ribosomes under different conditions
Analyze ribosome composition to detect stress-induced changes in ribosomal protein stoichiometry
Investigate whether environmental stressors lead to "specialized ribosomes" with altered composition
Translation fidelity and efficiency studies:
Reconstitute ribosomes with stress-modified L15 or L15 variants
Measure translation rates and error frequencies using reporter systems
Determine if L15 modifications contribute to selective translation of stress-response proteins
Integration with transcriptomic data:
Correlate ribosomal adaptations with broader cellular responses:
These studies can reveal how N. europaea modulates its translational machinery through L15 modifications to adapt to environmental challenges, with implications for understanding this organism's ecological role in nitrification processes.
N. europaea experiences frequent oxygen limitation in its environmental niches, which significantly affects its metabolism and transcriptome . L15 may play important roles in adaptation to these conditions:
Transcriptomic context:
Under oxygen-limited conditions, N. europaea exhibits various metabolic adaptations:
Reduced growth yield and non-stoichiometric ammonia-to-nitrite conversion
Upregulation of both heme-copper-containing cytochrome c oxidases
Significant increase in transcription of B-type heme-copper oxidase (proposed to function as a nitric oxide reductase)
L15's potential role in metabolic adaptation:
Translational regulation:
L15 modifications under oxygen limitation may affect ribosome function
Changes in L15 incorporation could alter translation of specific mRNAs related to energy metabolism
Hypothesize that L15 contributes to selective translation of oxidases upregulated during oxygen limitation
Energy conservation connection:
Transcriptomic data shows differential transcription of polyphosphate metabolism-related genes under oxygen limitation, with increased synthesis and unchanged degradation . This suggests:
ATP consumption pathways may be modulated through translational control
L15 modifications might influence translation efficiency of energy-related genes
Ribosome function may be optimized for energy conservation under stress
Experimental approaches:
Create reporter systems to monitor translation of specific mRNAs under oxygen limitation
Use ribosome profiling to map translation events across the transcriptome under different oxygen conditions
Isolate ribosomes from oxygen-limited cultures and characterize L15 status (modifications, incorporation)
Understanding L15's contribution to oxygen limitation response would provide insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying N. europaea's ecological versatility in environments with fluctuating oxygen levels.
Recombinant L15 protein can serve as a foundation for developing biosensors to monitor N. europaea activity in complex environmental samples. The approach draws inspiration from bioluminescence assays developed for N. europaea but focuses specifically on L15-based detection systems:
Design principles for L15-based biosensors:
Reporter fusion approaches:
Create C-terminal fusions of L15 with reporter proteins (GFP, luciferase)
Design expression vectors where the L15 promoter drives reporter gene expression
Develop split reporter systems where complementary fragments are fused to L15 and interacting partners
Detection strategies:
| Biosensor Type | Detection Method | Sensitivity | Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| L15-luciferase fusion | Bioluminescence | High | Real-time monitoring |
| L15 promoter-GFP | Fluorescence | Medium | Population dynamics |
| L15-aptamer systems | Electrochemical | Very high | Field detection |
Validation approaches:
Calibrate biosensor response against established methods for measuring N. europaea activity
Test specificity by comparing responses between N. europaea and related/unrelated bacteria
Validate in complex environmental matrices (soil, wastewater, aquatic samples)
The bioluminescence assay approach described for N. europaea provides a useful model, as it successfully expressed the Vibrio harveyi luxAB genes in N. europaea, resulting in observable light emission that responded to inhibitors . A similar approach using L15 as the basis for detection could provide specific information about ribosome status and protein synthesis activity in environmental samples.
L15's role in maintaining ribosomal function may significantly impact nitrification efficiency in N. europaea. Exploring this connection requires integrative experimental approaches:
Genetic manipulation strategies:
Create conditional knockdown strains of L15 in N. europaea (if genetic tools available)
Develop strains expressing modified versions of L15 with altered functionality
Use CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) to modulate L15 expression levels
Physiological assessment:
Measure key parameters of nitrification efficiency:
Ammonia oxidation rates under different L15 expression levels
Nitrite production kinetics and yield coefficients
Growth yield and coupling between ammonia oxidation and growth
Production of intermediates (hydroxylamine) and byproducts (NO, N₂O)
Mechanistic investigations:
Connect L15 function to nitrification biochemistry:
Analyze expression levels and translation efficiency of key nitrification enzymes:
Monitor enzyme activities in relation to L15 status:
Measure specific activities of purified enzymes
Assess in vivo electron flow through the respiratory chain
Quantify the impact on ATP generation and energy conservation
Integrate with transcriptomic data:
Previous studies have shown that under oxygen-limited conditions, N. europaea exhibits reduced growth yield and non-stoichiometric ammonia-to-nitrite conversion, alongside changes in gene expression patterns . Investigating how L15 influences translation of these differentially expressed genes would provide insights into ribosome-mediated adaptation mechanisms.
These approaches would reveal how L15-dependent ribosomal function contributes to N. europaea's ecological role in nitrification and nitrogen cycling.
Understanding how L15 expression responds to growth phases and environmental conditions provides insights into ribosomal adaptation in N. europaea. A comprehensive analysis would include:
Expression profiling across growth conditions:
Growth phase effects:
Monitor L15 mRNA and protein levels throughout batch culture (lag, exponential, stationary phases)
Compare with other ribosomal proteins to identify differential regulation
Correlate with ribosome abundance and activity
Environmental condition responses:
Specific responses during oxygen limitation:
Based on transcriptomic data, N. europaea shows significant metabolic adjustments under oxygen limitation . Investigating whether L15 is differentially regulated compared to other ribosomal proteins could reveal specialized roles in adaptation.
Methodological approaches:
Gene expression analysis:
RT-qPCR targeting L15 mRNA under different conditions
RNA-seq for transcriptome-wide context
Ribosome profiling to assess translation efficiency
Protein level analysis:
Western blotting with L15-specific antibodies
Quantitative proteomics using stable isotope labeling
Analysis of post-translational modifications by mass spectrometry
In situ visualization:
Fluorescent protein fusions to monitor L15 localization and abundance
Single-molecule FISH to detect mRNA distribution
Correlative light and electron microscopy to connect expression with ultrastructure
This multi-level analysis would reveal whether L15 exhibits condition-specific regulation that contributes to N. europaea's environmental adaptability, particularly in the context of its role as an ammonia-oxidizing bacterium in the nitrogen cycle.
Ribosomal proteins including L15 are often highly basic, which creates specific challenges for recombinant expression and purification. Based on successful approaches for similar proteins, the following strategies are recommended:
Expression optimization:
Codon optimization:
Adjust codon usage for N. europaea L15 to match E. coli preferences
Avoid rare codons, particularly for arginine and lysine, which are abundant in basic proteins
Fusion partner selection:
Expression conditions:
Lower induction temperatures (15-18°C) to slow synthesis and improve folding
Use auto-induction media for gradual protein expression
Co-express with chaperones to assist proper folding
Purification challenges and solutions:
RNA contamination:
Basic proteins like L15 often co-purify with host E. coli RNA
Implement high-salt washes (0.5-1M NaCl) during initial purification steps
Include RNase treatment during lysis and early purification steps
Consider benzonase nuclease treatment to eliminate all nucleic acids
Charge-based separation:
Utilize cation exchange chromatography after initial IMAC purification
Apply heparin affinity chromatography, which works well for nucleic acid-binding proteins
Develop a polyethyleneimine (PEI) precipitation step to remove nucleic acids before chromatography
Stability enhancement:
Maintain reducing conditions throughout purification (5mM DTT or 10mM β-mercaptoethanol)
Include stabilizing agents like arginine (50-100mM) to prevent aggregation
Use buffers that mimic the ribosomal environment (moderate salt, Mg²⁺, polyamines)
These strategies address the specific challenges associated with basic ribosomal proteins and can significantly improve the yield and purity of recombinant L15.
Reconstituting L15 into ribosomal particles is essential for structural and functional studies but presents several technical challenges. Based on approaches described in the literature, the following optimization strategies are recommended:
Preparation of ribosomal components:
Core particle preparation:
rRNA preparation alternatives:
If using isolated rRNA, ensure proper refolding by controlled cooling from denaturing conditions
Include magnesium and monovalent ions at physiological concentrations
Consider preparing rRNA fragments corresponding to L15 binding domains for initial binding studies
Reconstitution protocol optimization:
Sequential assembly approach:
Buffer optimization:
| Component | Concentration Range | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Mg²⁺ | 10-20 mM | Stabilizes rRNA tertiary structure |
| NH₄⁺/K⁺ | 100-200 mM | Promotes proper folding |
| Spermidine | 2-5 mM | Stabilizes RNA-protein interactions |
| HEPES/Tris | 20-50 mM (pH 7.5-8.0) | Maintains optimal pH |
Temperature and time considerations:
Perform initial binding at low temperature (0-4°C) followed by controlled warming
Allow sufficient incubation time (30-60 minutes) for proper incorporation
Consider thermal cycling protocols that promote correct assembly
Verification of reconstitution:
Functional verification:
Structural verification:
Analyze reconstituted particles by electron microscopy (negative staining or cryo-EM)
Perform sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation to confirm the sedimentation properties
Use protein-specific antibodies to verify L15 incorporation by Western blotting
These approaches address the specific challenges of reconstituting L15 into ribosomal particles and provide multiple methods to verify successful reconstitution.
Verifying that recombinant L15 maintains the same structural integrity as the native protein is critical for ensuring the validity of experimental findings. A comprehensive analytical approach includes:
Primary structure verification:
Mass spectrometry analysis:
Intact mass analysis to confirm the expected molecular weight
Peptide mapping by tryptic digestion and LC-MS/MS
Identification of any post-translational modifications present in native L15
N-terminal sequencing:
Secondary and tertiary structure analysis:
Spectroscopic techniques:
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to compare secondary structure content
Fluorescence spectroscopy to assess tertiary structure (if L15 contains tryptophan residues)
FTIR spectroscopy for complementary secondary structure information
Stability assessment:
Thermal shift assays (Thermofluor) to compare melting temperatures
Chemical denaturation curves using intrinsic fluorescence
Limited proteolysis patterns to identify domain boundaries and stability
Functional equivalence testing:
RNA binding assays:
In vitro reconstitution:
Compare the ability of recombinant and native L15 to incorporate into core particles
Assess reconstituted particle structure by electron microscopy
Functional testing of reconstituted ribosomes in translation assays
These analytical techniques provide a comprehensive assessment of structural integrity across multiple levels of protein structure, ensuring that recombinant L15 accurately represents the native protein for experimental studies.