GTPase essential for the late stages of ribosome biogenesis.
KEGG: neu:NE0153
STRING: 228410.NE0153
GTPase Der (also known as EngA or YphC in some bacteria) is a translational GTPase found in Nitrosomonas europaea, a gram-negative obligate chemolithoautotroph. Der belongs to a family of proteins whose GTPase activity is stimulated by the large ribosomal subunit . GTPase Der is nearly universally conserved across bacterial species, suggesting an essential role in basic cellular functions.
Functionally, Der is implicated in ribosome biogenesis and assembly. Unlike other translational GTPases such as EF-Tu and EF-G that are directly involved in the elongation phase of translation, Der appears to play a regulatory role in ribosome maturation. It contains characteristic domains including:
These structural features enable Der to interact with the ribosome during assembly, potentially facilitating the association of ribosomal proteins or rRNA processing.
Translational GTPases can be identified and classified using a combination of methods:
Hidden Markov Model (HMM) Approach:
Create subfamily-specific HMM profiles from well-conserved trGTPases
Compute phylogenetic trees based on the GTPase domain
Use iterative HMMSEARCH at increasing sensitivity levels
As detailed in Chain et al. (2007), this methodology was used to classify nine subfamilies of translational GTPases across 191 bacterial genomes . GTPase Der classification can be confirmed through phylogenetic analysis by:
Retrieving sequences through BLAST searches using known Der sequences
Aligning GTPase domains (full-length sequence alignment is often unreliable)
Constructing phylogenetic trees to validate subfamily placement
The protein contains specific domains that distinguish it from other GTPases including the unique two-GTPase domain structure and C-terminal KH-domain, which can be identified through domain analysis tools .
For successful expression of functional recombinant N. europaea GTPase Der, consider the following methodological approaches:
Expression System Selection:
E. coli BL21(DE3) or derivative strains are commonly used for recombinant expression
pET-based vectors with T7 promoter systems have demonstrated successful expression of Der proteins
Consider codon optimization if expression levels are low (particularly important for N. europaea genes which may have codon usage bias different from E. coli)
Expression Conditions:
| Parameter | Recommended Condition | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature | 18-25°C | Lower temperatures often yield more soluble protein |
| Induction | 0.1-0.5 mM IPTG | Lower IPTG concentrations may improve folding |
| Growth phase | Mid-log (OD600 0.6-0.8) | Optimal for induction timing |
| Duration | 4-16 hours | Extended expression at lower temperatures |
| Media | LB or TB with supplements | Consider adding 0.1-1.0 mM MgCl2 to stabilize GTPase |
Protein Solubility Considerations:
To enhance solubility of recombinant Der, researchers have successfully employed fusion partners such as MBP (maltose-binding protein) or SUMO tags, which can later be removed through specific protease cleavage sites.
Purification of N. europaea GTPase Der requires careful consideration of protein characteristics and activity requirements:
Multi-step Purification Protocol:
Initial Capture:
Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) using His-tagged constructs
Buffer composition: 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1-5 mM MgCl2 (critical for GTPase stability)
Imidazole gradient: 20-250 mM for washing and elution
Intermediate Purification:
Ion exchange chromatography (typically Q-Sepharose)
Buffer: 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT
NaCl gradient: 50-500 mM for elution
Polishing Step:
Size exclusion chromatography (Superdex 200)
Buffer: 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 10% glycerol
Activity Preservation Considerations:
Include 1-5 mM MgCl2 in all buffers to maintain nucleotide binding capability
Add 5-10% glycerol to prevent protein aggregation
Consider adding 0.1 mM GDP or GTP in storage buffers to stabilize protein conformation
Flash-freeze aliquots in liquid nitrogen and store at -80°C for long-term stability
Purified protein should reach ≥85% purity as verified by SDS-PAGE , with expected yield of 2-5 mg per liter of bacterial culture. Activity assays should be performed promptly to confirm functional integrity.
The genomic context of the der gene in N. europaea provides important insights into its functional relationships:
In N. europaea ATCC 19718, the der gene is positioned in a genomic region containing several critical genes involved in translation and transcription processes. This arrangement is similar to that found in other bacteria but with notable differences:
Comparative Genomic Organization:
| Feature | N. europaea | Common arrangement in other bacteria |
|---|---|---|
| Neighboring genes | RNA polymerase β and β′ subunits (rpoBC), elongation factors (fusA, tufB) | Often near ribosomal protein genes |
| Operon structure | Part of operon containing transcription and translation genes | Similar arrangement in E. coli but more variable in other species |
| Regulatory elements | Predicted σ70 promoter upstream | Generally conserved promoter elements |
As reported in Chain et al. (2003), the genome of N. europaea contains genes for ribosome-associated functions including elongation factors G (fusA) and Tu (tufB), and transcription anti-termination gene nusG . The der gene is likely part of this functional gene cluster.
The genomic proximity of der to these essential translation factors suggests coordinated expression and functional relationships in ribosome biogenesis pathways, potentially influenced by the unique metabolic constraints of N. europaea as an obligate chemolithoautotroph.
Investigating the in vivo interactions of GTPase Der with ribosomes in N. europaea presents unique challenges due to the slow growth rate and specialized metabolism of this organism. The following methodological approaches can be employed:
Genetic Manipulation Approaches:
Gene Disruption/Replacement:
Fluorescent Tagging:
Biochemical Interaction Analysis:
Ribosome Profiling:
Sucrose gradient centrifugation of cell lysates to separate ribosomal fractions
Western blot analysis of fractions using Der-specific antibodies
RNA analysis to identify associated ribosomal species
In vivo Crosslinking:
Formaldehyde or UV-based crosslinking to capture transient interactions
Immunoprecipitation with Der-specific antibodies
Mass spectrometry analysis of crosslinked complexes
Specialized Adaptation for N. europaea:
Custom media formulations supporting optimal growth (25 mM (NH4)2SO4 as nitrogen source)
Extended incubation periods (several days) to account for slow growth rates
Temperature control at 30°C in shaken batch cultures (175 rpm)
Because N. europaea has a doubling time of several days, experiments must be designed with longer timeframes than typical bacterial studies.
Structural characterization of N. europaea GTPase Der can provide critical insights into its functional mechanisms. Based on structural analysis approaches for related GTPases, researchers should consider:
Structural Determination Methods:
X-ray Crystallography:
Crystallization screening with nucleotide analogs (GDP, GTP, non-hydrolyzable GTP analogs)
Co-crystallization with ribosomal components or RNA fragments
Resolution targets of 2.5Å or better to resolve domain interactions
Cryo-electron Microscopy:
Sample preparation with ribosomes to capture interaction complexes
Classification analysis to identify different conformational states
Focus on structural transitions upon GTP binding/hydrolysis
Key Structural Features to Analyze:
The dual GTPase domains and their nucleotide-binding states
The C-terminal KH-domain and its RNA interaction surfaces
Conformational changes between GTP- and GDP-bound states
Interaction interfaces with ribosomal components
Molecular Dynamics Simulations:
Computational approaches can complement experimental structural data by:
Modeling nucleotide-dependent conformational changes
Predicting interaction surfaces with ribosomal components
Calculating energetics of domain movements during GTPase cycles
Understanding the structural basis of Der function would inform its specific role in ribosome biogenesis, which appears to be essential across bacterial species .
The function of GTPase Der in N. europaea must be considered within the context of this organism's unique metabolism as an obligate chemolithoautotroph:
Metabolic Context:
N. europaea derives all its energy from ammonia oxidation and must fix CO2 for carbon acquisition . This demanding metabolic lifestyle creates unique cellular conditions that may influence Der function:
Energy Limitations:
The energetic constraints of chemolithoautotrophy may require precise regulation of ribosome assembly
Der may play a critical role in balancing translation capacity with available energy resources
Growth Rate Adaptation:
Experimental Approaches to Investigate This Relationship:
Transcriptome analysis under varying ammonia concentrations to monitor der expression
Proteomics studies comparing Der protein levels across growth phases
Metabolic flux analysis to correlate translation machinery components with energy availability
Comparison with Other Bacterial Systems:
| Parameter | N. europaea | Heterotrophic bacteria (e.g., E. coli) |
|---|---|---|
| Energy source | Ammonia oxidation | Organic carbon compounds |
| Growth rate | Very slow (days) | Rapid (20-60 minutes) |
| Ribosome content | Lower per cell | Higher per cell |
| der expression | Likely tightly regulated | Constitutive with growth-dependent variation |
Given that N. europaea must carefully balance energy expenditure, GTPase Der likely plays a crucial role in optimizing ribosome assembly according to the energy available from ammonia oxidation, potentially with regulatory mechanisms unique to this metabolic specialist.