KEGG: neu:NE0641
STRING: 228410.NE0641
In Nitrosomonas europaea, the hisE gene organization differs significantly from that observed in enteric bacteria. Genome analysis reveals that hisI and hisE genes are not fused in N. europaea, but instead exist as adjacent genes whose open reading frames (ORFs) overlap . This genetic arrangement contrasts with enteric bacteria (γ-proteobacteria), where hisIE exists as a fused gene encoding a bifunctional enzyme.
This distinct gene organization places N. europaea in line with other β-proteobacteria, where monofunctional enzymes encoded by separate hisI and hisE genes are commonly found . The genomic data confirms that the fusion of hisIE occurred after the evolutionary split separating the γ subdivision from other proteobacteria subdivisions . Additionally, while most his genes in N. europaea are contiguous, the hisDG genes are separated from the rest of the operon, indicating further evolutionary divergence in the histidine biosynthesis pathway organization .
While specific information about recombinant expression of N. europaea hisE is limited in the search results, successful expression systems for other N. europaea proteins provide valuable guidance. One notable example is the successful transformation of N. europaea with a recombinant plasmid bearing the Vitreoscilla hemoglobin gene (vgb) under control of the N. europaea amoC P1 promoter .
This study demonstrated that:
Plasmids with ColE1 replication origin, native to E. coli, can be successfully maintained in N. europaea .
The amoC P1 promoter from N. europaea functions effectively for heterologous protein expression .
Stable maintenance of the recombinant plasmid was achieved with antibiotic selection (25 μg/mL ampicillin) .
Functional expression was confirmed through spectral analysis and enzymatic activity measurements .
For heterologous expression in E. coli, considerations should include:
Codon optimization, as N. europaea has different codon usage patterns
Expression temperature optimization, often lowered to enhance proper folding
Selection of appropriate fusion tags to improve solubility
Supplementation with cofactors that may be required for proper folding or activity
The successful expression of functional Vitreoscilla hemoglobin in N. europaea resulted in significant physiological effects, including a 2-fold increase in oxygen uptake rate and approximately 30% increase in ammonia to nitrite conversion . This suggests that similar expression strategies could be applied to produce recombinant N. europaea hisE with proper enzymatic activity.
Based on the biochemical properties of N. europaea and studies on other enzymes from this organism, the following buffer conditions would likely be optimal for purification and storage of recombinant hisE:
pH Considerations:
N. europaea growth and enzyme activity are significantly affected by pH. Studies on polyphosphate accumulation in N. europaea show that when culture pH decreases below approximately 7.4, significant changes in metabolic activities occur . This suggests that buffer pH in the range of 7.4-8.0 would be appropriate for maintaining enzyme stability and activity.
Buffer Components:
Primary buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl or phosphate buffer (pH 7.4-8.0)
Salt concentration: 150-300 mM NaCl to maintain ionic strength
Stabilizing agents: 10-20% glycerol to prevent protein aggregation
Reducing agents: 1-5 mM DTT or β-mercaptoethanol to maintain reduced cysteine residues
Metal ions: 2-5 mM MgCl₂ or MnCl₂ as potential cofactors for enzyme activity
Protease inhibitors: PMSF or commercial cocktails during initial purification steps
Storage Conditions:
Short-term storage (1-2 weeks): 4°C in purification buffer with added glycerol (20%)
Long-term storage: -80°C in aliquots with 25-50% glycerol
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles which can lead to activity loss
Enzyme-Specific Considerations:
For phosphoribosyl-ATP pyrophosphatase activity, including divalent metal ions is particularly important as they are typically required for the catalytic mechanism of pyrophosphatases. The enzyme's sensitivity to pH changes also suggests including appropriate buffering capacity to prevent local pH shifts during activity assays.
The distinct structural organization of hisE and hisI genes in Nitrosomonas europaea, where they exist as separate genes with overlapping ORFs, has significant implications for their functional characteristics compared to the fused hisIE in γ-proteobacteria . This genomic arrangement represents an evolutionary divergence that likely influences enzyme function and regulation.
Functional implications include:
Independent protein folding: As separate proteins, hisE and hisI in N. europaea fold independently rather than as a single polypeptide chain. This may allow for more efficient folding of each domain without constraints imposed by a covalent linkage.
Protein-protein interactions: The separate but adjacent genes with overlapping ORFs suggest that while transcriptionally linked, the proteins function as independent entities that may interact transiently. This differs from fused hisIE, where the two catalytic domains are permanently tethered.
Metabolic channeling effects: In bifunctional enzymes, substrate channeling often occurs between active sites. The separate hisE and hisI in N. europaea might exhibit different channeling dynamics, potentially affecting the efficiency of consecutive reactions in the histidine biosynthesis pathway.
Regulatory flexibility: The unfused state potentially allows for differential regulation of hisE and hisI expression or activity, providing more regulatory control points compared to the bifunctional enzyme.
Evolutionary significance: The gene arrangement in N. europaea represents an ancestral form that precedes the fusion event that occurred in γ-proteobacteria after their evolutionary divergence from other proteobacterial subdivisions .
This structural organization aligns with the observation that monofunctional enzymes encoded by hisI and hisE are commonly found in β-proteobacteria , suggesting a subdivision-specific adaptation in the histidine biosynthesis pathway.
Determining accurate kinetic parameters for recombinant Nitrosomonas europaea hisE requires rigorous methodological approaches that account for the enzyme's specific characteristics. The following comprehensive strategy addresses this research challenge:
1. Spectrophotometric Continuous Assays:
Monitor pyrophosphate release using coupled enzyme systems:
Inorganic pyrophosphatase to convert PPi to orthophosphate
Purine nucleoside phosphorylase and xanthine oxidase coupled system
Measurement at 340 nm for NADH oxidation in coupled reactions
2. Discontinuous Assays for Product Formation:
HPLC-based quantification of phosphoribosyl-AMP formation
Colorimetric determination of released pyrophosphate using malachite green
Mass spectrometry for precise product identification and quantification
3. Experimental Design for Kinetic Parameter Determination:
Vary substrate (phosphoribosyl-ATP) concentration across a wide range (0.1-10× Km)
Maintain excess of any auxiliary enzymes in coupled assays
Perform initial velocity measurements under steady-state conditions
Control temperature precisely (typically 25-30°C)
Include appropriate controls for background reactions
4. Data Analysis Approaches:
Primary plots: Michaelis-Menten, Lineweaver-Burk, Eadie-Hofstee
Global fitting of data to appropriate kinetic models
Statistical validation of derived parameters (confidence intervals)
5. Cofactor and Condition Dependencies:
Determine metal ion requirements by varying concentrations of Mg²⁺, Mn²⁺, or other divalent cations
Establish pH-rate profiles to identify catalytic residues
Perform temperature-dependence studies to calculate activation parameters
6. Inhibition Studies:
Product inhibition patterns to elucidate reaction mechanism
Substrate analogs to probe active site specificity
Potential allosteric regulators from histidine biosynthesis pathway
These methodological approaches provide a comprehensive framework for rigorous determination of N. europaea hisE kinetic parameters, enabling comparisons with hisE/hisIE enzymes from other species to understand evolutionary and functional differences.
Understanding the potential interactions between Nitrosomonas europaea hisE and other enzymes in the histidine biosynthesis pathway provides critical insights into metabolic organization and regulation. While specific interaction data for N. europaea hisE is not provided in the search results, a research-based approach to investigating these interactions would include:
1. Potential Interaction Partners:
HisI: As the enzyme catalyzing the adjacent reaction step and encoded by a gene with overlapping ORF, HisI is the most likely interaction partner . Their genetic arrangement suggests potential co-transcription and coordinated expression.
HisA: Catalyzes the step following the HisI reaction, potentially forming a functional complex for efficient substrate channeling.
Other His enzymes: May form higher-order complexes to facilitate substrate channeling throughout the pathway.
2. Experimental Approaches to Detect Interactions:
Co-immunoprecipitation with antibodies against recombinant HisE
Bacterial two-hybrid systems to screen for potential binding partners
Surface plasmon resonance to measure binding kinetics and affinities
Cross-linking studies followed by mass spectrometry to identify interaction interfaces
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) to detect interactions in vivo
3. Structural Basis for Interactions:
Computational docking simulations between HisE and potential partners
Identification of conserved interaction motifs through sequence analysis
Homology modeling based on known structures of similar enzyme complexes
4. Functional Significance of Interactions:
Kinetic analysis of coupled reactions with purified enzymes
Investigation of potential allosteric effects between pathway enzymes
Assessment of substrate channeling efficiency through transient kinetic measurements
5. Regulatory Implications:
Co-regulation patterns of histidine pathway genes under different growth conditions
Potential feedback inhibition mechanisms involving HisE-protein interactions
Phosphorylation or other post-translational modifications affecting interactions
Understanding these interactions is particularly relevant given the unusual gene organization in N. europaea, where hisI and hisE are separate genes with overlapping ORFs, unlike the fused hisIE in γ-proteobacteria . This distinct genetic arrangement may reflect unique functional interactions adapted to N. europaea's specialized metabolism.
While the crystal structure of N. europaea hisE has not been specifically reported in the search results, we can infer potential distinguishing structural features based on comparative genomics and the known properties of this enzyme family:
1. Monofunctional Architecture:
Unlike the bifunctional hisIE in γ-proteobacteria, N. europaea hisE functions as a standalone enzyme . This suggests a compact, dedicated fold optimized solely for phosphoribosyl-ATP pyrophosphatase activity rather than accommodating two catalytic domains. The monofunctional nature may allow for structural specialization specific to N. europaea's metabolic requirements.
2. Active Site Configuration:
The active site likely features conserved residues for catalysis common to phosphoribosyl-ATP pyrophosphatases, but may display unique substrate-binding pocket architecture. Given N. europaea's specialized ammonia-oxidizing metabolism , the enzyme might exhibit adaptations to function optimally within this biochemical context.
3. Metal Coordination:
As a pyrophosphatase, N. europaea hisE likely requires divalent metal ions for catalysis. The specific arrangement of metal-coordinating residues might be adapted to the cellular environment of N. europaea, which manages complex metal homeostasis, as evidenced by its multiple iron acquisition systems .
4. Potential Structural Adaptations:
N. europaea's genome reveals adaptations to its specialized lifestyle, including genes for multiple classes of iron receptors and over 20 genes devoted to these receptors . Similarly, hisE might display structural adaptations reflecting the organism's unique ecological niche.
5. Protein-Protein Interaction Interfaces:
With hisI and hisE genes having overlapping ORFs , their protein products likely interact. The hisE structure may contain specific interfaces for transient interaction with HisI that differ from those in organisms with different genetic arrangements.
6. Comparative Structural Analysis:
For a detailed structural characterization, approaches would include:
X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM of purified recombinant enzyme
Homology modeling based on related structures
Molecular dynamics simulations to predict flexible regions
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to map solvent accessibility
Understanding these structural features would provide insights into how N. europaea has adapted this essential enzyme to function within its specialized metabolic context as an ammonia-oxidizing bacterium.
Optimizing the expression and purification of recombinant Nitrosomonas europaea hisE requires addressing several critical factors to ensure high yield of functional enzyme. Based on successful approaches with other N. europaea proteins, the following comprehensive methodology is recommended:
Expression System Selection:
E. coli-based systems:
Native expression in N. europaea:
Expression Optimization:
Codon optimization: Adapt codons to match expression host preferences
Fusion tags:
N-terminal His₆-tag for affinity purification
Solubility-enhancing partners (MBP, SUMO, Thioredoxin) if initial expression yields insoluble protein
Induction conditions:
Temperature: Test 16°C, 25°C, and 37°C
IPTG concentration: 0.1-1.0 mM range
Induction duration: 4-24 hours
Media composition:
Rich media (LB, TB) for high cell density
Defined minimal media for controlled expression
Supplement with trace minerals reflecting N. europaea requirements
Purification Strategy:
Cell lysis:
Buffer composition: 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5-8.0), 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 5 mM MgCl₂
Gentle lysis methods to preserve enzyme structure
Complete protease inhibitor cocktail inclusion
Chromatography approach:
IMAC (Ni-NTA) for initial capture of His-tagged protein
Ion exchange chromatography based on predicted pI
Size exclusion chromatography as polishing step
Quality control:
SDS-PAGE to assess purity
Western blotting for identity confirmation
Activity assays after each purification step
Mass spectrometry for final verification
This methodological approach incorporates lessons from successful expression of other N. europaea proteins, including the observation that N. europaea can be transformed with recombinant plasmids and maintain them stably, allowing for both heterologous and homologous expression strategies .
Determining the oligomeric state of recombinant Nitrosomonas europaea hisE is crucial for understanding its structure-function relationships. The following comprehensive methodology provides multiple complementary approaches to investigate protein oligomerization:
1. Size-Based Methods:
Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC):
Compare elution profiles with molecular weight standards
Multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS) for absolute molecular weight determination
Perform runs at different protein concentrations to assess concentration-dependent oligomerization
Analytical Ultracentrifugation (AUC):
Sedimentation velocity experiments to determine sedimentation coefficient (S)
Sedimentation equilibrium for accurate molecular weight determination
Detect multiple species in equilibrium and determine association constants
Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS):
Rapid screening of hydrodynamic radius
Monitor potential aggregation or concentration-dependent behavior
Temperature-dependent measurements to assess oligomer stability
2. Structural Biology Approaches:
X-ray Crystallography:
Cryo-Electron Microscopy:
Visualization of oligomeric assemblies in near-native conditions
Particularly useful for larger complexes or flexible assemblies
Native Mass Spectrometry:
Determine precise oligomeric states and potential heterogeneity
Investigate non-covalent interactions maintaining the oligomer
3. Biophysical Characterization:
Chemical Crosslinking:
Use bifunctional reagents followed by SDS-PAGE analysis
MS analysis of crosslinked peptides to identify interaction interfaces
In-cell crosslinking to verify physiological relevance
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET):
Label protein with donor/acceptor fluorophores
Measure oligomerization in solution or in vivo
Determine proximity and orientation of subunits
4. Computational Analysis:
Sequence-based prediction:
Analysis of conserved oligomerization interfaces
Comparison with related enzymes of known quaternary structure
Structural modeling:
Homology modeling followed by interface prediction
Molecular dynamics simulations to assess stability of predicted oligomers
These methodological approaches provide a robust framework for determining whether N. europaea hisE forms functionally relevant oligomeric structures, similar to other characterized proteins from this organism, such as the dimeric cytochrome P460 .
When recombinant Nitrosomonas europaea hisE exhibits poor enzymatic activity, a systematic troubleshooting approach is essential to identify and resolve the underlying issues. This comprehensive methodology addresses the most common problems:
1. Protein Quality Assessment:
Structural Integrity Analysis:
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to verify secondary structure
Thermal shift assays to assess protein stability
Limited proteolysis to detect misfolded regions
Protein Homogeneity Evaluation:
Size exclusion chromatography to detect aggregation
Dynamic light scattering for polydispersity analysis
Native PAGE to assess multiple conformational states
Post-translational Modifications:
Mass spectrometry to identify unexpected modifications
Phosphorylation or oxidation state analysis
Check for improper disulfide bond formation
2. Reaction Condition Optimization:
Buffer Component Screening:
pH optimization (range 6.0-9.0)
Ionic strength variation (NaCl concentration 0-500 mM)
Buffer type testing (Tris, HEPES, phosphate, MOPS)
Metal Ion Requirements:
Test various divalent cations (Mg²⁺, Mn²⁺, Zn²⁺, Co²⁺)
Titration of metal concentration (0.1-10 mM)
Consider metal chelation and reconstitution
Reducing Environment:
Addition of DTT or β-mercaptoethanol (1-10 mM)
Test effect of glutathione (oxidized/reduced) on activity
Evaluate activity under anaerobic conditions
3. Substrate-Related Factors:
Substrate Quality:
Verify substrate purity by HPLC or mass spectrometry
Test freshly prepared versus stored substrate
Consider enzymatic synthesis of substrate to ensure quality
Substrate Concentration:
Wide-range substrate titration (0.01-10× estimated Km)
Check for substrate inhibition at higher concentrations
Evaluate potential alternative substrates
4. Expression and Purification Optimization:
Alternative Expression Systems:
Test different E. coli strains or other host organisms
Vary expression temperature (16-37°C)
Consider co-expression with molecular chaperones
Fusion Tag Influence:
Compare activity before and after tag removal
Test different tag positions (N-terminal vs. C-terminal)
Evaluate impact of different fusion partners on activity
Purification Strategy Refinement:
Minimize exposure to potentially denaturing conditions
Include stabilizing agents throughout purification
Consider gentler elution methods
This systematic approach addresses the major factors affecting recombinant enzyme activity, drawing on principles that have been successful for other N. europaea enzymes, such as the successfully expressed and functionally active Vitreoscilla hemoglobin in N. europaea .
Accurate measurement of phosphoribosyl-ATP pyrophosphatase activity requires sensitive, specific, and reproducible assay methods. The following comprehensive methodological approach provides multiple complementary techniques for reliable activity determination:
1. Pyrophosphate (PPi) Release Detection Methods:
Colorimetric Malachite Green Assay:
Based on complex formation between malachite green, molybdate, and phosphate
Requires coupling with inorganic pyrophosphatase to convert PPi to phosphate
Sensitivity: 0.1-10 nmol phosphate
Advantages: Simple, economical, plate reader compatible
Limitations: Potential interference from buffers containing phosphate
Enzymatically Coupled Continuous Assays:
PPi → 2Pi (inorganic pyrophosphatase)
Pi + Purine nucleoside → Ribose-1-P + Base (purine nucleoside phosphorylase)
Base → Uric acid + H₂O₂ (xanthine oxidase)
H₂O₂ + ABTS → Oxidized ABTS (peroxidase)
Monitor at 410 nm (ABTS oxidation)
Advantages: Continuous monitoring, high sensitivity
Limitations: Multiple coupling enzymes increase complexity
Fluorometric Assays:
MESG (2-amino-6-mercapto-7-methylpurine riboside) + Pi → Ribose-1-P + Fluorescent product
Requires inorganic pyrophosphatase coupling
Excitation/Emission: 360/460 nm
Advantages: Higher sensitivity than colorimetric methods (10-100 pmol)
Limitations: Potential fluorescence interference from samples
2. Direct Product Formation Measurement:
HPLC-Based Detection:
Separate substrate (phosphoribosyl-ATP) from product (phosphoribosyl-AMP)
UV detection at 260 nm
Advantages: Direct measurement without coupling enzymes, simultaneous substrate depletion monitoring
Limitations: Lower throughput, requires specialized equipment
Mass Spectrometry:
LC-MS/MS for absolute quantification of phosphoribosyl-AMP formation
Multiple reaction monitoring for enhanced sensitivity and specificity
Advantages: Highest specificity, can detect multiple reaction products simultaneously
Limitations: Requires specialized equipment and expertise, lower throughput
3. Radiochemical Assays:
¹⁴C or ³H-Labeled Substrate:
Separation of radioactive product by TLC or HPLC
Quantification by scintillation counting
Advantages: Extremely sensitive, direct measurement
Limitations: Requires radioactive materials, lower throughput
4. Assay Validation Parameters:
Controls:
Heat-inactivated enzyme negative control
Known amount of product as positive control
Substrate stability control (no enzyme)
Linearity Verification:
With respect to enzyme concentration
With respect to reaction time
With respect to substrate concentration
These methodological approaches provide multiple options for reliable measurement of phosphoribosyl-ATP pyrophosphatase activity under various experimental conditions, enabling accurate kinetic characterization of recombinant N. europaea hisE.
Distinguishing between experimental artifacts and true biological variation in Nitrosomonas europaea hisE activity requires a rigorous analytical approach. The following comprehensive methodology addresses this critical research challenge:
1. Systematic Control Experiments:
Enzyme Quality Controls:
Prepare multiple independent batches of recombinant hisE
Compare specific activity across preparations
Analyze protein homogeneity by multiple methods (SEC, DLS, native PAGE)
Thermal stability assessment as quality metric
Reagent Purity Verification:
Analyze substrate purity by HPLC or mass spectrometry
Prepare fresh buffers to eliminate degradation products
Test for inhibitory contaminants in commercial reagents
Include internal standards where possible
Instrument Calibration:
Regular calibration of spectrophotometers, fluorometers
Temperature verification in reaction chambers
Standard curves with each experimental set
2. Statistical Analysis Approaches:
Replicate Design:
Technical replicates (same enzyme preparation, multiple measurements)
Biological replicates (independent enzyme preparations)
Experimental day as blocking factor in statistical models
Outlier Identification:
Apply Grubb's test or Dixon's Q-test for statistical outliers
Chauvenet's criterion for data point rejection
Examine residuals in regression analyses
Variance Component Analysis:
Partition observed variance into contributing factors
Identify largest sources of variation
Nested ANOVA to separate preparation, day, and measurement variance
3. Assay Robustness Evaluation:
Method Validation Parameters:
Precision: Intra-day and inter-day coefficient of variation (<10%)
Accuracy: Recovery of known additions (90-110%)
Linearity: R² > 0.99 for standard curves
Limits of detection and quantification determination
Interference Testing:
Spike-recovery experiments with purified enzyme
Deliberate introduction of potential interferents
Matrix effect quantification from expression system
4. Cross-Validation Strategies:
Orthogonal Methods:
Compare activity measurements using different detection principles
Direct (product formation) versus indirect (coupled enzyme) assays
Correlation analysis between different methodological approaches
Independent Laboratory Verification:
Collaborative analysis with standardized protocols
Blind sample testing to eliminate bias
Round-robin testing for systematic laboratory effects
5. Experimental Design Optimization:
Sequential versus Randomized Testing:
Implement randomized complete block designs
Account for potential carry-over effects
Consider Latin square designs for multiple factor testing
Response Surface Methodology:
Systematically vary multiple parameters
Identify interaction effects between variables
Develop predictive models of enzyme behavior
1. Phylogenetic Context Analysis:
The genome sequence of N. europaea reveals that hisI and hisE genes are not fused but exist as adjacent genes with overlapping ORFs . This organization differs markedly from γ-proteobacteria, where hisIE exists as a bifunctional enzyme. Comparative genomics indicates that monofunctional enzymes encoded by separate hisI and hisE genes are commonly found in β-proteobacteria , positioning N. europaea within the expected phylogenetic pattern.
The genomic evidence suggests that the hisIE gene fusion occurred after the evolutionary split separating the γ subdivision from other proteobacterial subdivisions . This observation provides a temporal framework for the fusion event, indicating it was not an ancestral characteristic of all proteobacteria but rather a derived trait in the γ lineage.
2. Functional Implications Assessment:
Separate hisE and hisI genes with overlapping ORFs suggest a transitional evolutionary state that maintains coordinated expression while preserving distinct protein products. This arrangement may offer several adaptive advantages:
Regulatory flexibility: Independent post-transcriptional regulation becomes possible
Protein folding efficiency: Each protein can fold independently without constraints imposed by domain fusion
Functional specialization: Potential for each enzyme to optimize catalytic parameters
Protein-protein interaction dynamics: Transient rather than covalent association may allow for integration with other cellular processes
3. Comparative Genomic Context:
Beyond the hisE/hisI organization, researchers should consider the broader genomic context. In N. europaea, while most his genes are contiguous, hisDG genes are separated from the rest of the operon . This suggests multiple reorganization events in the histidine biosynthesis pathway, potentially reflecting adaptation to the organism's specialized lifestyle as an ammonia oxidizer.
4. Molecular Evolution Rate Analysis:
Researchers can examine the relative conservation of hisE and hisI sequences across bacterial lineages to determine if separate genes evolve at different rates compared to fused genes. Higher conservation might indicate stronger selective pressure, while sequence divergence might suggest adaptation to specific metabolic contexts.
5. Experimental Approaches for Functional Testing:
To fully interpret the evolutionary significance, researchers should consider experimental approaches:
Engineering artificial gene fusions to test functional consequences
Comparative enzymology between monofunctional and bifunctional enzymes
Transcriptomic and proteomic analysis to assess expression coordination
Protein-protein interaction studies to characterize physical associations
This analytical framework provides researchers with a comprehensive approach to interpreting the evolutionary significance of the separate hisE and hisI genes in N. europaea, placing this genomic feature in its proper phylogenetic and functional context.