KEGG: neu:NE0527
STRING: 228410.NE0527
RlmE (previously known as RrmJ or FtsJ) is an S-adenosyl methionine (AdoMet)-dependent methyltransferase that catalyzes the 2'-O-methylation of the ribose at position Um2552 in 23S ribosomal RNA. In N. europaea, as in other bacteria, this modification is crucial for proper ribosome assembly and function.
Unlike many other rRNA modification enzymes whose deletion causes minimal growth defects, RlmE deletion results in a substantial decrease in growth rate (2-4 fold slower than wild-type cells) . This is because:
RlmE mediates the methylation of Um2552, which is situated adjacent to G2553
G2553 is an essential base that anchors the 3' CCA terminus of the A-site tRNA in the peptidyl transferase center (PTC)
The modification affects RNA folding, stabilization, and subsequent ribosome assembly
RlmE functions primarily during the late stages of large ribosomal subunit (LSU) biogenesis, unlike many other PTC region modifications that occur during early or intermediate assembly stages .
N. europaea RlmE shares the core catalytic domains and functions with RlmE from other bacteria, but with some notable differences:
| Feature | N. europaea RlmE | E. coli RlmE | Other bacterial RlmE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sequence identity | Reference | Moderate homology | Variable homology |
| Catalytic domain | Rossmann-like fold | Rossmann-like fold | Conserved across species |
| Optimal temperature | ~30°C (reflective of N. europaea growth) | ~37°C | Species-dependent |
| Cellular context | Functions in ammonia-oxidizing metabolism background | Functions in heterotrophic metabolism | Varies by species |
| Expression levels | Differentially regulated under oxygen limitation | Constitutively expressed | Varies by species |
The unique metabolic background of N. europaea as an ammonia-oxidizing bacterium with a limited set of energy sources potentially influences how RlmE functions within its cellular context, particularly under different oxygen availability conditions .
Several expression systems have been successfully used for recombinant N. europaea proteins, which can be applied to RlmE:
E. coli expression systems: Most commonly used due to:
Rapid growth
High protein yields
Well-established protocols
Compatibility with methyltransferase expression
Common vectors include pET-based systems with T7 promoters, typically using BL21(DE3) or Rosetta strains to address codon usage differences.
Homologous expression in N. europaea: While more challenging, this approach preserves native folding and post-translational modifications:
Electroporation is the established method for introducing plasmid DNA into N. europaea
Promoters from highly expressed N. europaea genes, such as the hao (hydroxylamine oxidoreductase) promoter, have been successfully used to drive expression
Selection is typically performed using kanamycin resistance
Cell-free protein synthesis: Useful for producing potentially toxic proteins:
Rapid production
Avoids growth-inhibitory effects
Allows incorporation of modified amino acids
The choice of expression system should consider the downstream application and whether native folding and activity are critical to your research question.
Purification of recombinant N. europaea RlmE typically follows these steps, with optimization considerations at each stage:
Expression optimization:
Test multiple temperatures (18-30°C)
Vary IPTG concentrations (0.1-1.0 mM)
Consider auto-induction media for higher yields
Expression time (typically 4-24 hours)
Cell lysis:
Buffer composition: 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5-8.0), 300-500 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol
Include protease inhibitors
Add 1-5 mM β-mercaptoethanol or DTT to maintain reduced cysteines
Consider adding S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) or S-adenosylhomocysteine (AdoHcy) for stability
Affinity chromatography:
His-tagged purification using Ni-NTA is most common
Wash with 20-40 mM imidazole to reduce non-specific binding
Elute with 250-300 mM imidazole
Use gravity flow or FPLC depending on scale
Secondary purification:
Ion exchange chromatography (typically anion exchange)
Size exclusion chromatography
Remove imidazole via dialysis before enzyme activity assays
Quality control:
SDS-PAGE for purity assessment
Western blot confirmation
Mass spectrometry for identity confirmation
Enzymatic activity assay
For optimal activity, the final storage buffer should contain:
20-50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5-8.0)
100-200 mM NaCl
1-5 mM DTT
10-20% glycerol
Storage at -80°C in small aliquots to avoid freeze-thaw cycles
Several complementary methods can be used to assess RlmE methyltransferase activity:
Primer extension assay:
Incubate recombinant RlmE with in vitro transcribed 23S rRNA
Use reverse transcriptase to create cDNA from the template
Low dNTP concentrations cause reverse transcriptase to pause one nucleotide before methylation sites
Analyze products using gel electrophoresis
Radiometric methylation assay:
Incubate RlmE with substrate RNA and S-[methyl-³H]adenosylmethionine
Filter reaction through charged filters to capture RNA
Measure incorporated radioactivity by scintillation counting
Calculate enzyme kinetics (Km, kcat, kcat/Km)
HPLC-based assays:
Digest modified RNA with nucleases
Separate nucleotides using HPLC
Detect methylated versus unmethylated nucleotides by their retention times
Quantify peak areas for activity assessment
Mass spectrometry:
Analyze methylation by mass difference
Can distinguish between different methylation types
Provides accurate quantification of modification levels
In vivo complementation assay:
Express recombinant N. europaea RlmE in an E. coli ΔrlmE knockout strain
Measure growth rate recovery
Analyze ribosome profiles by sucrose gradient centrifugation
Quantify 50S, 70S and polysome levels
The table below compares these methods:
| Method | Advantages | Limitations | Sensitivity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primer extension | Site-specific detection, visual confirmation | Semi-quantitative, labor-intensive | Moderate |
| Radiometric assay | Highly quantitative, direct measure of activity | Requires radioactive materials, not site-specific | High |
| HPLC | Quantitative, no radioactivity | Requires specialized equipment, less sensitive | Moderate |
| Mass spectrometry | Precise, can detect multiple modifications | Expensive, complex data analysis | Very high |
| Complementation | Tests physiological relevance | Indirect measure, affected by many factors | Low-moderate |
To ensure your recombinant protein maintains native structure and function, employ these techniques:
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy:
Assess secondary structure elements (α-helices, β-sheets)
Monitor thermal stability (melting temperature)
Compare with known methyltransferase CD profiles
Thermal shift assays (Thermofluor):
Measure protein stability under various conditions
Identify optimal buffer compositions
Assess the impact of cofactors (SAM/AdoMet)
Determine stabilizing ligands
Size exclusion chromatography with multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS):
Determine oligomeric state
Confirm monodispersity
Detect protein aggregation
Enzymatic assays with various substrates:
Test activity on in vitro transcribed 23S rRNA
Compare activity with isolated domain V of 23S rRNA
Measure activity on ribosomes at different assembly stages
Structural characterization:
X-ray crystallography
Cryo-electron microscopy
NMR for smaller domains
Compare with known methyltransferase structures
The 3D structure prediction (if not experimentally determined) would likely show a catalytic domain with a Rossmann-like fold similar to other methyltransferases, with the characteristic S-adenosylmethionine binding site and catalytic tetrad (K-D-K-E) necessary for methyl transfer activity .
N. europaea is an obligate aerobic chemolithoautotroph that oxidizes ammonia to nitrite, but it can adapt to oxygen-limited conditions by adjusting its metabolism. Research suggests that oxygen limitation affects RlmE and other translation-related factors in the following ways:
Transcriptional changes:
Under oxygen limitation, N. europaea differentially regulates genes involved in energy conservation and ribosome biogenesis
Genes encoding ribosomal proteins and translation factors often show altered expression patterns
RNA modification enzymes, potentially including RlmE, may be upregulated to maintain ribosome assembly under stress conditions
Metabolic adaptations:
Ribosome assembly:
Oxygen limitation may affect ribosome assembly kinetics
RlmE function becomes particularly critical during stress conditions
Proper rRNA modifications help maintain translation fidelity under suboptimal growth conditions
This table summarizes the effects of oxygen limitation on N. europaea growth parameters and potential impacts on RlmE function:
| Parameter | NH₃-limited (aerobic) | O₂-limited | Potential impact on RlmE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Growth yield | 0.40 ± 0.01 g/mol NH₃ | 0.35 ± 0.01 g/mol NH₃ | Increased demand for efficient ribosome assembly |
| NH₃ consumption rate | 24.73 ± 0.53 mmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹ | 28.51 ± 1.13 mmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹ | Higher metabolic rate requiring efficient translation |
| N balance (stoichiometry) | Stoichiometric | Non-stoichiometric | Altered energy availability for biosynthetic processes |
| Standing NH₄⁺ concentration | ~0 mmol liter⁻¹ | ~30 mmol liter⁻¹ | Changed cellular metabolism |
These findings suggest that RlmE activity may be particularly important during oxygen limitation to maintain efficient ribosome assembly and translation .
RlmE methylates position Um2552 in the 23S rRNA, which is close to the peptidyl transferase center (PTC) of the ribosome. This modification affects ribosome assembly and function, with implications for antibiotic resistance:
To elucidate the precise mechanisms of RlmE-RNA interactions, consider these advanced approaches:
X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM studies:
Crystallize RlmE alone and in complex with SAM and RNA fragments
Use cryo-EM to visualize RlmE interactions with full 23S rRNA or pre-50S particles
Map the binding interface between RlmE and its substrate
Identify key residues involved in substrate recognition and catalysis
RNA-protein crosslinking studies:
UV-induced crosslinking followed by mass spectrometry (MS) analysis
Site-specific incorporation of photo-reactive nucleotides in the RNA substrate
Identify direct contact points between RlmE and rRNA
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS):
Map conformational changes upon substrate binding
Identify flexible regions that accommodate RNA
Compare with other methyltransferases to identify conserved binding mechanisms
Single-molecule approaches:
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) to measure conformational changes during catalysis
Single-molecule enzymology to characterize the kinetic mechanism
Molecular dynamics simulations:
Model the interaction between RlmE and its rRNA substrate
Predict conformational changes during catalysis
Guide mutagenesis studies to validate key interactions
Based on structural studies of related methyltransferases, RlmE likely contains:
A catalytic domain with a Rossmann-like fold for SAM binding
A K-D-K-E catalytic tetrad for 2'-O methylation
An RNA-binding surface with positively charged residues
Potentially specific recognition elements for the RNA sequence/structure surrounding position U2552
N. europaea is an environmental bacterium that faces various stresses in its natural habitats. Recombinant RlmE can be used to investigate bacterial adaptation mechanisms in several ways:
Expression under stress conditions:
Generate reporter constructs (e.g., luciferase or GFP fusions) to monitor RlmE expression under different stresses
Compare expression levels under ammonia limitation, oxygen limitation, temperature stress, and chemical stressors
Correlate RlmE expression with ribosome biogenesis rates
Ribosome modification dynamics:
Analyze how the rate and extent of Um2552 methylation changes under stress conditions
Map the complete rRNA modification pattern under different growth conditions
Determine whether rRNA modifications serve as a regulatory mechanism during stress response
In vitro reconstitution experiments:
Use purified recombinant RlmE to reconstitute ribosome assembly in vitro
Test how factors like pH, temperature, and ionic conditions affect RlmE activity
Compare ribosome assembly kinetics with and without RlmE
Functional role in oxidative stress:
N. europaea produces reactive nitrogen species during ammonia oxidation
Investigate whether RlmE-mediated rRNA modification helps maintain translation fidelity under oxidative/nitrosative stress
Compare with how other bacteria regulate translation during stress
Competitive fitness assays:
Create RlmE knockout or overexpression strains in N. europaea
Compete these strains against wild-type under various environmental conditions
Quantify the fitness advantage conferred by proper rRNA modification
Studies in E. coli have shown that RlmE knockouts have severe growth defects (2-4 fold decrease in growth rate) , but the phenotype may be even more pronounced in N. europaea due to its more constrained energy metabolism as a chemolithoautotroph.
N. europaea contains several rRNA methyltransferases that modify different positions in ribosomal RNA. Understanding their mechanistic differences provides insights into ribosome biogenesis:
Comparison of methyltransferase mechanisms:
| Feature | RlmE | RlmM | RlmKL | Other MTases |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target position | Um2552 | Cm2498 | m⁷G2069, m²G2445 | Various |
| Modification type | 2'-O-ribose | 2'-O-ribose | Base methylation | Various |
| Timing in assembly | Late | Early/intermediate | Early | Various |
| Catalytic motif | K-D-K-E tetrad | K-D-K-E tetrad | Base-specific | Depends on type |
| Phenotype of deletion | Severe growth defect | Mild defect | Mild defect | Usually mild |
| Substrate specificity | 23S rRNA, assembly intermediate | Can modify in vitro transcripts | Specific sequence context | Varies |
RlmE's unique role in ribosome biogenesis:
Unlike most modification enzymes that act early, RlmE methylates a late assembly intermediate
The Um2552 modification occurs near functionally critical sites in the ribosome
Only RlmE knockouts show severe growth defects among methyltransferase mutants
RlmE function may couple rRNA modification with large subunit maturation
Domain organization differences:
Research implications:
Study the hierarchical nature of rRNA modifications in ribosome assembly
Investigate whether certain modifications are prerequisites for others
Explore potential interactions between different modification enzymes during assembly
Understanding these differences is crucial for developing a comprehensive model of ribosome biogenesis in bacteria and potentially identifying new antibiotic targets.