Recombinant Nocardia farcinica 50S ribosomal protein L31 (rpmE)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction to Recombinant Nocardia farcinica 50S Ribosomal Protein L31 (rpmE)

Recombinant Nocardia farcinica 50S ribosomal protein L31 (rpmE) is a bioengineered version of a ribosomal protein critical for bacterial translation. Native to N. farcinica, a Gram-positive pathogen causing opportunistic infections, rpmE is part of the 50S ribosomal subunit, where it facilitates ribosome assembly and translation by interacting with 23S rRNA and other ribosomal components . The recombinant form is produced in Escherichia coli for research purposes, enabling structural, functional, and immunological studies .

Key Features of N. farcinica rpmE

ParameterValue
Full-Length SequenceMKAGIHPAYV DTTVVCGCGN TFQTRSTKES GHITVEVCSQ CHPFYTGKQK ILDTGGRVAR FEARYGKRAG KKADAK (1–76 aa)
Molecular Weight~34.9 kDa (estimated based on E. coli homologs; exact value not specified)
TagDetermined during manufacturing (e.g., GST, His)
Purity>85% (SDS-PAGE validated)
ReactivityN. farcinica-specific; cross-reactivity with N. cyriacigeorgica noted in some studies

Role in Ribosome Function

RpmE binds to 23S rRNA, stabilizing the 50S subunit and mediating intersubunit interactions. In E. coli, homologs like bL31 form the B1b bridge, critical for ribosome dynamics . While N. farcinica rpmE’s precise interactions remain unstudied, its sequence conservation with E. coli suggests analogous roles in ribosome assembly and translation .

Recombinant Expression

  • Host: E. coli (e.g., BL21(DE3)) .

  • Vector: pET30a or similar plasmids for prokaryotic expression .

  • Optimal Conditions: IPTG induction at 28°C for maximal yield .

Primary Research Applications

  1. Structural Studies:

    • SDS-PAGE: Used to confirm purity and molecular weight .

    • X-ray Crystallography: Potential for elucidating RNA-binding interfaces, though no data exist for N. farcinica rpmE .

  2. Immunological Research:

    • Antigenicity: Recognized by N. farcinica and N. cyriacigeorgica antisera but not cross-reactive with Mycobacterium bovis .

    • Vaccine Development: While not tested for rpmE, related N. farcinica proteins (e.g., NFA47630) show immunoprotective potential .

  3. Functional Studies:

    • Ribosome Dynamics: Hypothetical use in reconstituting N. farcinica ribosomes to study translation regulation .

    • Pathogenesis: Investigating rpmE’s role in N. farcinica survival within host cells or evasion of immune responses (inferred from E. coli models) .

Comparative Analysis with E. coli rpmE

FeatureN. farcinica rpmEE. coli rpmE (bL31)
Sequence Identity~30–40% (estimated; exact alignment needed)
RNA-BindingPredicted via disordered regions (hypothetical)Confirmed via 5S rRNA and operator stem-loops
RegulationNot studiedAutogenous translational repression
Vaccine TargetUnexploredNot relevant (non-pathogenic E. coli)

Research Gaps and Future Directions

  1. Structural Insights:

    • Cryo-EM Studies: Required to map rpmE’s interactions with N. farcinica 23S rRNA and adjacent proteins.

    • Mutagenesis: Investigating regions critical for RNA binding (e.g., N-terminal disordered domains) .

  2. Pathogenicity:

    • Host-Pathogen Interaction: Testing rpmE’s role in evading host defenses or promoting intracellular survival (analogous to mce1 operon proteins) .

  3. Diagnostic Potential:

    • Serological Markers: rpmE’s specificity for N. farcinica infections could aid in developing species-specific diagnostic assays .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us; we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
rpmE; NFA_10530; 50S ribosomal protein L31
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-76
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Nocardia farcinica (strain IFM 10152)
Target Names
rpmE
Target Protein Sequence
MKAGIHPAYV DTTVVCGCGN TFQTRSTKES GHITVEVCSQ CHPFYTGKQK ILDTGGRVAR FEARYGKRAG KKADAK
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Binds to the 23S rRNA.
Database Links
Protein Families
Bacterial ribosomal protein bL31 family, Type A subfamily

Q&A

What is the rpmE gene in Nocardia farcinica and how does it compare to other bacterial species?

The rpmE gene in Nocardia farcinica encodes the 50S ribosomal protein L31, a small basic bacteria-specific ribosomal protein (r-protein) that plays a crucial role in ribosome assembly and function. While specific characterization of N. farcinica rpmE is still emerging, studies in related bacterial species like E. coli have shown that the rpmE gene is transcribed from two promoter regions with closely spaced transcription start sites . The gene product (bL31) is involved in forming the protein-protein intersubunit bridge B1b, which connects the 30S and 50S ribosomal subunits and contributes significantly to ribosome dynamics .

What structural and functional characteristics define the L31 protein in Nocardia farcinica?

The L31 protein in N. farcinica, like its counterparts in other bacteria, is characterized by:

  • A highly disordered structure when not incorporated into ribosomes

  • An unstructured amino-terminal region rich in lysine residues

  • Lack of classical RNA-binding domains despite RNA-binding capabilities

  • Dual functionality as both a ribosomal component and an autogenous repressor

Computational predictions using tools like TriPepSVM and IntFOLD servers have cataloged L31 as an RNA-binding protein despite its lack of canonical RNA-binding domains . The protein achieves RNA binding through sequences that are intrinsically disordered, particularly in the lysine-rich amino-terminal region, which has been shown critical for autogenous regulation in related bacteria .

Functionally, L31 in Nocardia likely participates in ribosome assembly and stability, particularly in forming intersubunit bridges, similar to its role in E. coli where it interacts with protein L5 in the 50S subunit and S13 in the 30S subunit .

How does ribosomal protein L31 contribute to bacterial pathogenesis?

While the direct contribution of L31 to N. farcinica pathogenesis has not been fully characterized, several lines of evidence suggest potential pathogenic roles:

  • As a core ribosomal protein, L31 is essential for proper protein synthesis, which underlies all aspects of bacterial metabolism and virulence factor production

  • The dual role of L31 as both a ribosomal component and a regulator of gene expression may allow it to influence pathogenicity through regulatory networks

  • N. farcinica possesses several virulence factors including mce operons that contribute to the pathogenicity of this bacterial group

  • Ribosomal proteins can sometimes moonlight as surface-exposed antigens that interact with host components

Studies demonstrating the expression of ribosomal proteins during infection support their relevance to in vivo pathogenesis. Similar to how Mce1E proteins are expressed during N. farcinica infection and elicit antibody responses in experimental animals , L31 may also be immunogenic during infection.

What are the optimal expression systems and conditions for producing recombinant N. farcinica L31 protein?

Based on experimental approaches used for similar bacterial proteins, the following expression system is recommended:

Table 1: Optimized Expression System for Recombinant N. farcinica L31

ComponentRecommendationRationale
Expression vectorpET30a(+)Provides T7 promoter control and His-tag for purification
Host strainE. coli BL21(DE3)Lacks lon and ompT proteases; compatible with T7 expression system
Growth mediumLuria-Bertani (LB)Standard rich medium for protein expression
Induction0.5-1.0 mM IPTG at OD600 0.6-0.8Optimal for T7 promoter-driven expression
Temperature25-30°C post-inductionLower temperatures may improve solubility of ribosomal proteins
Harvest time4-6 hours post-inductionBalance between yield and protein quality

The cloning approach should include:

  • PCR amplification of the rpmE gene from N. farcinica genomic DNA using specific primers that incorporate appropriate restriction sites (such as NdeI and HindIII) for directional cloning

  • Restriction enzyme digestion, ligation into the expression vector, and transformation into a cloning strain before final transformation into the expression host

  • Sequence verification to confirm the correct reading frame and absence of mutations

For optimization, small-scale expression trials evaluating different temperatures, IPTG concentrations, and harvest times are recommended before scaling up production.

What purification strategies yield high-purity recombinant L31 protein suitable for functional and structural studies?

A multi-step purification protocol is recommended to achieve high purity:

Table 2: Purification Strategy for Recombinant L31 Protein

Purification StepMethodParametersExpected Result
Initial captureImmobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC)Ni-NTA resin; 20-250 mM imidazole gradient80-90% purity; removal of bulk contaminants
Secondary purificationIon exchange chromatographySP Sepharose (cation exchange) due to L31's basic nature95% purity; separation from similar-sized proteins
Final polishingSize exclusion chromatographySuperdex 75 or equivalent>98% purity; removal of aggregates
Buffer exchangeDialysis or desalting columnAgainst appropriate storage bufferRemoval of elution components

Key considerations include:

  • Cell lysis should be performed in denaturing conditions (8M urea) if the protein forms inclusion bodies, followed by refolding, or in native conditions with protease inhibitors if soluble expression is achieved

  • The lysine-rich N-terminal region of L31 makes it well-suited for cation exchange chromatography at pH 7.0-7.5

  • The final product should be assessed by SDS-PAGE, Western blotting, mass spectrometry, and circular dichroism to confirm identity, purity, and proper folding

  • Storage conditions should include 10-20% glycerol and flash freezing in liquid nitrogen for long-term stability

How can researchers design experimental approaches to characterize the RNA-binding properties of N. farcinica L31?

To characterize the RNA-binding properties of N. farcinica L31, a comprehensive approach incorporating multiple complementary techniques is recommended:

This multi-faceted approach would provide comprehensive data on the specific RNA sequences recognized by L31, the protein domains involved in RNA binding, and the structural basis for this interaction.

How can researchers assess the role of L31 in ribosome assembly and function in N. farcinica?

To investigate L31's role in ribosome assembly and function, researchers should implement a multi-pronged approach:

  • Genetic Manipulation Studies:

    • Create a conditional knockout of rpmE in N. farcinica

    • Complement with wild-type or mutant variants

    • Assess growth characteristics under various conditions

    • Analyze ribosome profiles using sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation

  • Ribosome Profiling:

    • Apply ribo-seq (ribosome profiling) to wild-type and L31-depleted cells

    • Analyze translational efficiency and pausing sites

    • Identify specific mRNAs affected by L31 depletion

  • In vitro Translation Assays:

    • Reconstitute ribosomes with and without L31

    • Measure translation rates of reporter constructs

    • Assess fidelity using misincorporation assays

  • Intersubunit Bridge Analysis:

    • Perform cryo-EM studies of ribosomes with and without L31

    • Analyze the integrity of bridge B1b

    • Quantify subunit association/dissociation kinetics

  • Molecular Dynamics Simulations:

    • Model the interaction between L31 and other bridge components

    • Predict effects of specific mutations

    • Correlate with experimental findings

Table 3: Expected Phenotypes in L31 Functional Studies

Experimental ConditionExpected Ribosome ProfilePredicted Translation PhenotypeBridge B1b Status
Wild-type L31Normal polysome distributionEfficient translationIntact
L31 knockoutIncreased free subunits, decreased polysomesReduced translation efficiencyDisrupted
N-terminal deletion mutantIntermediate profilePartial translation defectPartially functional
C-terminal deletion mutantNear-normal profile*Minor defects in certain mRNAsIntact*

*Based on findings in E. coli where C-terminal mutations affected 30S interactions but not repressor function

By systematically characterizing these aspects, researchers can develop a comprehensive understanding of L31's functional significance in N. farcinica ribosomes.

What approaches can be used to study the autogenous regulation of rpmE in Nocardia farcinica?

To investigate the autogenous regulation of rpmE in N. farcinica, researchers should build upon the approaches used for E. coli rpmE regulation studies, with adaptations for Nocardia-specific biology:

  • Reporter Fusion Constructs:

    • Generate chromosomally integrated fusions of N. farcinica rpmE regulatory regions with reporter genes (lacZ or fluorescent proteins)

    • Create constructs with all natural rpmE promoters and corresponding 5'UTRs, as well as constructs with individual promoters

    • Transform these constructs into N. farcinica or appropriate heterologous hosts

  • Trans-effect Analysis:

    • Introduce plasmids expressing wild-type L31 under inducible control

    • Measure reporter gene expression with and without L31 overexpression

    • Include unrelated reporter constructs as specificity controls

  • Identification of RNA Regulatory Elements:

    • Perform phylogenetic analysis to identify conserved stem-loop structures in rpmE 5'UTR among Nocardia species

    • Use computational approaches to predict RNA secondary structures

    • Validate through site-directed mutagenesis of the predicted operator elements

  • L31 Mutant Analysis:

    • Create L31 variants with deletions or mutations in potential RNA-binding regions

    • Test their repressor activity using the reporter system

    • Focus particularly on the unstructured amino-terminal part which has been shown crucial for repressor activity in related systems

  • In vivo Footprinting:

    • Apply SHAPE (Selective 2'-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension) to map RNA structure in vivo

    • Compare results in the presence and absence of L31 protein

    • Identify regions protected by L31 binding

This comprehensive approach would provide detailed insights into the molecular mechanisms of rpmE autogenous regulation in N. farcinica, potentially revealing unique regulatory features compared to other bacterial species.

How can researchers investigate potential connections between L31 function and virulence in N. farcinica infections?

Investigating connections between L31 function and N. farcinica virulence requires integrative approaches spanning molecular genetics, cellular microbiology, and infection models:

  • L31 Expression Analysis During Infection:

    • Employ qRT-PCR to quantify rpmE transcript levels during different infection stages

    • Use immunoblotting with L31-specific antibodies to detect protein expression in infected tissues

    • Apply immunohistochemistry to visualize L31 localization in infected host tissues

  • Host-Pathogen Interaction Studies:

    • Assess whether recombinant L31 protein alone can interact with host cells

    • Test if L31-coated beads can invade mammalian cells (similar to approaches used for Mce proteins)

    • Evaluate host immune responses to purified L31 using cytokine profiling

  • L31 Mutation Effects on Virulence:

    • Create conditional or inducible L31 mutants in N. farcinica

    • Compare virulence between wild-type and mutant strains in infection models

    • Evaluate bacterial persistence, dissemination, and host damage

  • Immunological Characterization:

    • Test sera from N. farcinica-infected animals for antibodies against L31

    • Evaluate T-cell responses to L31 epitopes

    • Assess whether L31 upregulates inflammatory cytokines like IFN-γ in splenocytes (similar to observations with other N. farcinica proteins)

  • Comparative Genomics and Transcriptomics:

    • Compare L31 sequence and expression patterns between virulent and less virulent Nocardia strains

    • Identify potential correlations between L31 variants and clinical manifestations

    • Examine whether L31 regulation is altered during adaptation to host environments

By integrating these approaches, researchers can determine whether L31 contributes directly to virulence (as a moonlighting protein with extra-ribosomal functions) or indirectly (through its essential role in ribosome function and protein synthesis regulation).

What are common challenges in recombinant expression of N. farcinica L31 and how can they be addressed?

Recombinant expression of bacterial ribosomal proteins like L31 presents several challenges that researchers should anticipate and address:

Table 4: Troubleshooting Guide for Recombinant L31 Expression

ChallengePotential CausesSolutions
Low expression levelsCodon bias in E. coliUse codon-optimized synthetic gene; express in Rosetta strains with rare tRNA genes
Toxic to host cellsUse tight expression control; lower incubation temperature; use C41/C43 E. coli strains designed for toxic proteins
Insoluble protein/inclusion bodiesImproper foldingExpress at lower temperatures (16-25°C); co-express with chaperones; use solubility tags (SUMO, MBP, TRX)
High expression levels overwhelming folding machineryReduce inducer concentration; harvest cells earlier
Proteolytic degradationHost proteasesAdd protease inhibitors during purification; use protease-deficient host strains
Inherent instability of L31Optimize buffer conditions; add stabilizing agents like glycerol or arginine
Impurities in purified proteinNon-specific binding to affinity resinIncrease imidazole in wash buffers; add additional purification steps
Interaction with host RNA/DNAInclude nuclease treatment and high-salt washes
Poor binding to RNA targetsImproper foldingVerify protein structure by circular dichroism; optimize refolding conditions
Buffer incompatibilityTest different pH values and salt concentrations for binding assays

Implementing these solutions should improve yields of functional recombinant L31 protein suitable for downstream applications. Monitoring each step with appropriate analytical methods (SDS-PAGE, Western blot, activity assays) is essential for troubleshooting.

How can researchers design experiments to explore the phylogenetic conservation and evolution of L31 proteins across Nocardia species and related genera?

To investigate the phylogenetic relationships and evolution of L31 proteins, researchers should combine bioinformatic and experimental approaches:

  • Sequence Collection and Alignment:

    • Retrieve rpmE gene and L31 protein sequences from multiple Nocardia species and related actinomycetes

    • Perform multiple sequence alignments using MUSCLE, MAFFT, or similar tools

    • Identify conserved domains, variable regions, and signature motifs

  • Phylogenetic Analysis:

    • Construct phylogenetic trees using maximum likelihood, Bayesian inference, and neighbor-joining methods

    • Assess tree reliability through bootstrap analysis and posterior probabilities

    • Compare L31 phylogeny with species phylogeny to detect horizontal gene transfer events

  • Structural Conservation Analysis:

    • Generate homology models of L31 proteins from different species

    • Overlay structures to identify conserved structural elements

    • Map conserved residues onto 3D models to reveal functional domains

  • Regulatory Region Analysis:

    • Examine conservation of promoter regions and 5'UTRs across species

    • Identify conserved RNA secondary structures that may function as translational operators

    • Validate predictions through experimental probing of RNA structures

  • Functional Complementation:

    • Test whether L31 proteins from different Nocardia species can complement each other

    • Create chimeric L31 proteins combining domains from different species

    • Assess both ribosomal integration and autoregulatory functions

  • Selection Pressure Analysis:

    • Calculate dN/dS ratios to identify sites under positive or purifying selection

    • Correlate evolutionary patterns with functional domains

    • Compare evolutionary rates between different bacterial lineages

This systematic approach would reveal how L31 has evolved across the Nocardia genus and related bacteria, providing insights into both conserved functions and species-specific adaptations.

What emerging technologies could advance our understanding of N. farcinica L31 structure and function?

Several cutting-edge technologies hold promise for deepening our understanding of L31 biology:

  • Cryo-Electron Microscopy (Cryo-EM):

    • High-resolution structural analysis of intact ribosomes with L31 in situ

    • Visualization of conformational changes during translation

    • Mapping of L31 interactions with rRNA and other proteins

  • Single-Molecule Fluorescence Techniques:

    • Real-time observation of L31 dynamics during ribosome assembly

    • FRET studies to measure distance changes during functional cycles

    • Single-molecule tracking of L31 in live cells

  • Ribosome Profiling with Next-Generation Sequencing:

    • Genome-wide analysis of translation in L31 mutant vs. wild-type conditions

    • Identification of specific mRNAs affected by L31 alterations

    • Detection of ribosome pausing sites dependent on L31 function

  • CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing in Nocardia:

    • Precise gene modifications to create point mutations in endogenous rpmE

    • Generation of conditional knockdowns to study essentiality

    • Creation of reporter fusions at the native locus

  • Cross-linking Mass Spectrometry:

    • Identification of direct interaction partners of L31 in vivo

    • Mapping of contact sites between L31 and other ribosomal components

    • Detection of potential extra-ribosomal interactions

  • Integrative -Omics Approaches:

    • Combining transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics in L31 mutants

    • Network analysis to position L31 in cellular pathways

    • Correlation with virulence phenotypes in infection models

The integration of these advanced technologies would provide unprecedented insights into the structural dynamics, functional significance, and regulatory roles of L31 in N. farcinica biology and pathogenesis.

How might understanding L31 function contribute to the development of novel antimicrobials against Nocardia infections?

The exploration of L31 as a potential therapeutic target offers several promising avenues for antimicrobial development:

  • L31 as a Direct Drug Target:

    • Design of small molecules that disrupt L31 incorporation into ribosomes

    • Peptide mimetics targeting the interface between L31 and other bridge components

    • RNA-targeting compounds that interfere with L31-RNA interactions

  • Exploiting L31 Regulatory Mechanisms:

    • Compounds that mimic L31 binding to its operator to repress ribosome synthesis

    • Antisense oligonucleotides targeting rpmE mRNA

    • RNA aptamers that capture L31 protein and prevent ribosomal integration

  • Species-Selective Targeting:

    • Identification of sequence and structural differences between N. farcinica L31 and human ribosomal proteins

    • Development of compounds that selectively bind bacterial L31 variants

    • Structure-based design exploiting Nocardia-specific features

  • L31 as a Diagnostic Target:

    • Development of PCR assays targeting rpmE sequences unique to Nocardia species

    • Creation of antibody-based diagnostic tools for detecting L31 in clinical samples

    • Mass spectrometry methods for rapid identification of L31 peptides from patient specimens

  • Combination Therapies:

    • Identification of synergistic effects between L31-targeting compounds and existing antibiotics

    • Dual-targeting approaches addressing both L31 and other ribosomal components

    • Drugs that sensitize N. farcinica to host immune defenses by altering L31 function

Given the emergence of antibiotic resistance in Nocardia species and the challenges in treating nocardiosis, developing novel antimicrobial strategies based on L31 biology could significantly advance therapeutic options for these challenging infections.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.