Recombinant Nocardia farcinica 50S ribosomal protein L31 (rpmE) is a bioengineered version of a ribosomal protein critical for bacterial translation. Native to N. farcinica, a Gram-positive pathogen causing opportunistic infections, rpmE is part of the 50S ribosomal subunit, where it facilitates ribosome assembly and translation by interacting with 23S rRNA and other ribosomal components . The recombinant form is produced in Escherichia coli for research purposes, enabling structural, functional, and immunological studies .
RpmE binds to 23S rRNA, stabilizing the 50S subunit and mediating intersubunit interactions. In E. coli, homologs like bL31 form the B1b bridge, critical for ribosome dynamics . While N. farcinica rpmE’s precise interactions remain unstudied, its sequence conservation with E. coli suggests analogous roles in ribosome assembly and translation .
Vector: pET30a or similar plasmids for prokaryotic expression .
Optimal Conditions: IPTG induction at 28°C for maximal yield .
Structural Studies:
Immunological Research:
Functional Studies:
Structural Insights:
Pathogenicity:
Diagnostic Potential:
KEGG: nfa:NFA_10530
STRING: 247156.nfa10530
The rpmE gene in Nocardia farcinica encodes the 50S ribosomal protein L31, a small basic bacteria-specific ribosomal protein (r-protein) that plays a crucial role in ribosome assembly and function. While specific characterization of N. farcinica rpmE is still emerging, studies in related bacterial species like E. coli have shown that the rpmE gene is transcribed from two promoter regions with closely spaced transcription start sites . The gene product (bL31) is involved in forming the protein-protein intersubunit bridge B1b, which connects the 30S and 50S ribosomal subunits and contributes significantly to ribosome dynamics .
The L31 protein in N. farcinica, like its counterparts in other bacteria, is characterized by:
A highly disordered structure when not incorporated into ribosomes
An unstructured amino-terminal region rich in lysine residues
Lack of classical RNA-binding domains despite RNA-binding capabilities
Dual functionality as both a ribosomal component and an autogenous repressor
Computational predictions using tools like TriPepSVM and IntFOLD servers have cataloged L31 as an RNA-binding protein despite its lack of canonical RNA-binding domains . The protein achieves RNA binding through sequences that are intrinsically disordered, particularly in the lysine-rich amino-terminal region, which has been shown critical for autogenous regulation in related bacteria .
Functionally, L31 in Nocardia likely participates in ribosome assembly and stability, particularly in forming intersubunit bridges, similar to its role in E. coli where it interacts with protein L5 in the 50S subunit and S13 in the 30S subunit .
While the direct contribution of L31 to N. farcinica pathogenesis has not been fully characterized, several lines of evidence suggest potential pathogenic roles:
As a core ribosomal protein, L31 is essential for proper protein synthesis, which underlies all aspects of bacterial metabolism and virulence factor production
The dual role of L31 as both a ribosomal component and a regulator of gene expression may allow it to influence pathogenicity through regulatory networks
N. farcinica possesses several virulence factors including mce operons that contribute to the pathogenicity of this bacterial group
Ribosomal proteins can sometimes moonlight as surface-exposed antigens that interact with host components
Studies demonstrating the expression of ribosomal proteins during infection support their relevance to in vivo pathogenesis. Similar to how Mce1E proteins are expressed during N. farcinica infection and elicit antibody responses in experimental animals , L31 may also be immunogenic during infection.
Based on experimental approaches used for similar bacterial proteins, the following expression system is recommended:
The cloning approach should include:
PCR amplification of the rpmE gene from N. farcinica genomic DNA using specific primers that incorporate appropriate restriction sites (such as NdeI and HindIII) for directional cloning
Restriction enzyme digestion, ligation into the expression vector, and transformation into a cloning strain before final transformation into the expression host
Sequence verification to confirm the correct reading frame and absence of mutations
For optimization, small-scale expression trials evaluating different temperatures, IPTG concentrations, and harvest times are recommended before scaling up production.
A multi-step purification protocol is recommended to achieve high purity:
| Purification Step | Method | Parameters | Expected Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial capture | Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) | Ni-NTA resin; 20-250 mM imidazole gradient | 80-90% purity; removal of bulk contaminants |
| Secondary purification | Ion exchange chromatography | SP Sepharose (cation exchange) due to L31's basic nature | 95% purity; separation from similar-sized proteins |
| Final polishing | Size exclusion chromatography | Superdex 75 or equivalent | >98% purity; removal of aggregates |
| Buffer exchange | Dialysis or desalting column | Against appropriate storage buffer | Removal of elution components |
Key considerations include:
Cell lysis should be performed in denaturing conditions (8M urea) if the protein forms inclusion bodies, followed by refolding, or in native conditions with protease inhibitors if soluble expression is achieved
The lysine-rich N-terminal region of L31 makes it well-suited for cation exchange chromatography at pH 7.0-7.5
The final product should be assessed by SDS-PAGE, Western blotting, mass spectrometry, and circular dichroism to confirm identity, purity, and proper folding
Storage conditions should include 10-20% glycerol and flash freezing in liquid nitrogen for long-term stability
To characterize the RNA-binding properties of N. farcinica L31, a comprehensive approach incorporating multiple complementary techniques is recommended:
This multi-faceted approach would provide comprehensive data on the specific RNA sequences recognized by L31, the protein domains involved in RNA binding, and the structural basis for this interaction.
To investigate L31's role in ribosome assembly and function, researchers should implement a multi-pronged approach:
Genetic Manipulation Studies:
Create a conditional knockout of rpmE in N. farcinica
Complement with wild-type or mutant variants
Assess growth characteristics under various conditions
Analyze ribosome profiles using sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation
Ribosome Profiling:
Apply ribo-seq (ribosome profiling) to wild-type and L31-depleted cells
Analyze translational efficiency and pausing sites
Identify specific mRNAs affected by L31 depletion
In vitro Translation Assays:
Reconstitute ribosomes with and without L31
Measure translation rates of reporter constructs
Assess fidelity using misincorporation assays
Intersubunit Bridge Analysis:
Perform cryo-EM studies of ribosomes with and without L31
Analyze the integrity of bridge B1b
Quantify subunit association/dissociation kinetics
Molecular Dynamics Simulations:
Model the interaction between L31 and other bridge components
Predict effects of specific mutations
Correlate with experimental findings
| Experimental Condition | Expected Ribosome Profile | Predicted Translation Phenotype | Bridge B1b Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wild-type L31 | Normal polysome distribution | Efficient translation | Intact |
| L31 knockout | Increased free subunits, decreased polysomes | Reduced translation efficiency | Disrupted |
| N-terminal deletion mutant | Intermediate profile | Partial translation defect | Partially functional |
| C-terminal deletion mutant | Near-normal profile* | Minor defects in certain mRNAs | Intact* |
*Based on findings in E. coli where C-terminal mutations affected 30S interactions but not repressor function
By systematically characterizing these aspects, researchers can develop a comprehensive understanding of L31's functional significance in N. farcinica ribosomes.
To investigate the autogenous regulation of rpmE in N. farcinica, researchers should build upon the approaches used for E. coli rpmE regulation studies, with adaptations for Nocardia-specific biology:
Reporter Fusion Constructs:
Generate chromosomally integrated fusions of N. farcinica rpmE regulatory regions with reporter genes (lacZ or fluorescent proteins)
Create constructs with all natural rpmE promoters and corresponding 5'UTRs, as well as constructs with individual promoters
Transform these constructs into N. farcinica or appropriate heterologous hosts
Trans-effect Analysis:
Identification of RNA Regulatory Elements:
L31 Mutant Analysis:
In vivo Footprinting:
Apply SHAPE (Selective 2'-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension) to map RNA structure in vivo
Compare results in the presence and absence of L31 protein
Identify regions protected by L31 binding
This comprehensive approach would provide detailed insights into the molecular mechanisms of rpmE autogenous regulation in N. farcinica, potentially revealing unique regulatory features compared to other bacterial species.
Investigating connections between L31 function and N. farcinica virulence requires integrative approaches spanning molecular genetics, cellular microbiology, and infection models:
L31 Expression Analysis During Infection:
Employ qRT-PCR to quantify rpmE transcript levels during different infection stages
Use immunoblotting with L31-specific antibodies to detect protein expression in infected tissues
Apply immunohistochemistry to visualize L31 localization in infected host tissues
Host-Pathogen Interaction Studies:
L31 Mutation Effects on Virulence:
Create conditional or inducible L31 mutants in N. farcinica
Compare virulence between wild-type and mutant strains in infection models
Evaluate bacterial persistence, dissemination, and host damage
Immunological Characterization:
Comparative Genomics and Transcriptomics:
Compare L31 sequence and expression patterns between virulent and less virulent Nocardia strains
Identify potential correlations between L31 variants and clinical manifestations
Examine whether L31 regulation is altered during adaptation to host environments
By integrating these approaches, researchers can determine whether L31 contributes directly to virulence (as a moonlighting protein with extra-ribosomal functions) or indirectly (through its essential role in ribosome function and protein synthesis regulation).
Recombinant expression of bacterial ribosomal proteins like L31 presents several challenges that researchers should anticipate and address:
| Challenge | Potential Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Low expression levels | Codon bias in E. coli | Use codon-optimized synthetic gene; express in Rosetta strains with rare tRNA genes |
| Toxic to host cells | Use tight expression control; lower incubation temperature; use C41/C43 E. coli strains designed for toxic proteins | |
| Insoluble protein/inclusion bodies | Improper folding | Express at lower temperatures (16-25°C); co-express with chaperones; use solubility tags (SUMO, MBP, TRX) |
| High expression levels overwhelming folding machinery | Reduce inducer concentration; harvest cells earlier | |
| Proteolytic degradation | Host proteases | Add protease inhibitors during purification; use protease-deficient host strains |
| Inherent instability of L31 | Optimize buffer conditions; add stabilizing agents like glycerol or arginine | |
| Impurities in purified protein | Non-specific binding to affinity resin | Increase imidazole in wash buffers; add additional purification steps |
| Interaction with host RNA/DNA | Include nuclease treatment and high-salt washes | |
| Poor binding to RNA targets | Improper folding | Verify protein structure by circular dichroism; optimize refolding conditions |
| Buffer incompatibility | Test different pH values and salt concentrations for binding assays |
Implementing these solutions should improve yields of functional recombinant L31 protein suitable for downstream applications. Monitoring each step with appropriate analytical methods (SDS-PAGE, Western blot, activity assays) is essential for troubleshooting.
To investigate the phylogenetic relationships and evolution of L31 proteins, researchers should combine bioinformatic and experimental approaches:
Sequence Collection and Alignment:
Retrieve rpmE gene and L31 protein sequences from multiple Nocardia species and related actinomycetes
Perform multiple sequence alignments using MUSCLE, MAFFT, or similar tools
Identify conserved domains, variable regions, and signature motifs
Phylogenetic Analysis:
Construct phylogenetic trees using maximum likelihood, Bayesian inference, and neighbor-joining methods
Assess tree reliability through bootstrap analysis and posterior probabilities
Compare L31 phylogeny with species phylogeny to detect horizontal gene transfer events
Structural Conservation Analysis:
Generate homology models of L31 proteins from different species
Overlay structures to identify conserved structural elements
Map conserved residues onto 3D models to reveal functional domains
Regulatory Region Analysis:
Functional Complementation:
Test whether L31 proteins from different Nocardia species can complement each other
Create chimeric L31 proteins combining domains from different species
Assess both ribosomal integration and autoregulatory functions
Selection Pressure Analysis:
Calculate dN/dS ratios to identify sites under positive or purifying selection
Correlate evolutionary patterns with functional domains
Compare evolutionary rates between different bacterial lineages
This systematic approach would reveal how L31 has evolved across the Nocardia genus and related bacteria, providing insights into both conserved functions and species-specific adaptations.
Several cutting-edge technologies hold promise for deepening our understanding of L31 biology:
Cryo-Electron Microscopy (Cryo-EM):
High-resolution structural analysis of intact ribosomes with L31 in situ
Visualization of conformational changes during translation
Mapping of L31 interactions with rRNA and other proteins
Single-Molecule Fluorescence Techniques:
Real-time observation of L31 dynamics during ribosome assembly
FRET studies to measure distance changes during functional cycles
Single-molecule tracking of L31 in live cells
Ribosome Profiling with Next-Generation Sequencing:
Genome-wide analysis of translation in L31 mutant vs. wild-type conditions
Identification of specific mRNAs affected by L31 alterations
Detection of ribosome pausing sites dependent on L31 function
CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing in Nocardia:
Precise gene modifications to create point mutations in endogenous rpmE
Generation of conditional knockdowns to study essentiality
Creation of reporter fusions at the native locus
Cross-linking Mass Spectrometry:
Identification of direct interaction partners of L31 in vivo
Mapping of contact sites between L31 and other ribosomal components
Detection of potential extra-ribosomal interactions
Integrative -Omics Approaches:
Combining transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics in L31 mutants
Network analysis to position L31 in cellular pathways
Correlation with virulence phenotypes in infection models
The integration of these advanced technologies would provide unprecedented insights into the structural dynamics, functional significance, and regulatory roles of L31 in N. farcinica biology and pathogenesis.
The exploration of L31 as a potential therapeutic target offers several promising avenues for antimicrobial development:
L31 as a Direct Drug Target:
Design of small molecules that disrupt L31 incorporation into ribosomes
Peptide mimetics targeting the interface between L31 and other bridge components
RNA-targeting compounds that interfere with L31-RNA interactions
Exploiting L31 Regulatory Mechanisms:
Compounds that mimic L31 binding to its operator to repress ribosome synthesis
Antisense oligonucleotides targeting rpmE mRNA
RNA aptamers that capture L31 protein and prevent ribosomal integration
Species-Selective Targeting:
Identification of sequence and structural differences between N. farcinica L31 and human ribosomal proteins
Development of compounds that selectively bind bacterial L31 variants
Structure-based design exploiting Nocardia-specific features
L31 as a Diagnostic Target:
Combination Therapies:
Identification of synergistic effects between L31-targeting compounds and existing antibiotics
Dual-targeting approaches addressing both L31 and other ribosomal components
Drugs that sensitize N. farcinica to host immune defenses by altering L31 function
Given the emergence of antibiotic resistance in Nocardia species and the challenges in treating nocardiosis, developing novel antimicrobial strategies based on L31 biology could significantly advance therapeutic options for these challenging infections.