Recombinant Nocardia farcinica Lipoyl synthase (lipA)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder

Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized fulfillment.

Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.

Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice shipping is specifically requested and confirmed in advance. Additional fees will apply for dry ice shipping.

Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and the protein's inherent stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is recommended for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.

The tag type is determined during production. Please specify your desired tag type for preferential development and production.

Synonyms
lipA; NFA_16860Lipoyl synthase; EC 2.8.1.8; Lip-syn; LS; Lipoate synthase; Lipoic acid synthase; Sulfur insertion protein LipA
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-352
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Nocardia farcinica (strain IFM 10152)
Target Names
Target Protein Sequence
MTSVDTPTPH GGTPAPAPAT ANGRKLLRIE ARNAQTPIER KPKWIRTRAT MGPEYSELKG LVKREGLHTV CEEAGCPNIF ECWEDREATF LIGGEQCTRR CDFCQIDTGK PAALDRDEPR RVAESVQAMG LRYSTITGVA RDDLEDGGAW LYAETVRAIK RLNPATGVEL LIPDFNADPD QLAEVFSARP EVLAHNLETV PRIFKRIRPA FRYERSLSVL TAAREAGLVT KSNLILGMGE TPEEVTEAMR DLHEAGCDIL TITQYLRPSP RHHPVDRWVK PEEFVEHSRV AEEIGFAGVM AGPLVRSSYR AGRLYAQAMA HHGREIPPAM AHLAEEGTAS QEASAVLARF GS
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

Lipoyl synthase (LipA) catalyzes the radical-mediated insertion of two sulfur atoms into the C-6 and C-8 positions of the octanoyl moiety bound to the lipoyl domains of lipoate-dependent enzymes, thereby converting octanoylated domains into lipoylated derivatives.

Database Links
Protein Families
Radical SAM superfamily, Lipoyl synthase family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is Lipoyl synthase (LipA) and what is its function in Nocardia farcinica?

Lipoyl synthase (LipA) is an enzyme responsible for catalyzing a critical step in the biosynthesis of lipoic acid, a cofactor essential for central metabolism. Specifically, LipA catalyzes the insertion of two sulfur atoms at unactivated C6 and C8 positions of a protein-bound octanoyl chain to produce the lipoyl cofactor . In Nocardia farcinica, as in other organisms, this enzyme plays a crucial role in primary metabolism.

The catalytic mechanism involves the use of a [4Fe-4S] cluster and S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) radical chemistry to activate the substrate for sulfur insertion . This represents one of the most chemically challenging reactions in biological systems, as it involves the formation of carbon-sulfur bonds at unactivated carbon centers. The ability to perform this reaction makes LipA a significant enzyme from both biochemical and evolutionary perspectives.

How does the structure of N. farcinica LipA compare to LipA from other organisms?

N. farcinica LipA shares structural similarities with LipA enzymes from other organisms, particularly those from the actinomycete family. Crystal structures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis LipA have revealed important insights that likely apply to N. farcinica LipA due to their phylogenetic relatedness .

The key structural features include:

  • A primary [4Fe-4S] cluster that interacts with S-adenosylmethionine to generate radical species

  • An auxiliary [4Fe-4S] cluster that serves as the source of sulfur atoms for insertion

  • An unusual serine ligation to one of the iron atoms in the auxiliary cluster in the resting state

  • A binding pocket that accommodates the octanoyl substrate in position for radical-based sulfur insertion

During catalysis, significant structural changes occur, including the dissociation of the serine ligand from the auxiliary cluster, loss of an iron ion, and covalent attachment of a sulfur atom from the cluster to the substrate . These structural transitions represent a unique "cannibalization" mechanism where the enzyme sacrifices its own iron-sulfur cluster to provide sulfur atoms for the reaction.

What expression systems are most efficient for producing recombinant N. farcinica LipA?

For successful expression of recombinant N. farcinica LipA, several expression systems have proven effective, with specific modifications to enhance solubility and activity:

E. coli-based expression systems:

  • BL21(DE3) strain with pET-based vectors has shown good results for expressing soluble LipA

  • Addition of a hexahistidine tag (His-tag) facilitates purification while maintaining enzymatic activity

  • Co-expression with iron-sulfur cluster assembly machinery (ISC) genes improves [4Fe-4S] cluster incorporation

  • Expression at lower temperatures (16-18°C) after IPTG induction reduces inclusion body formation

Methodology for optimal expression:

  • Clone the N. farcinica lipA gene into a pET-based vector with an N-terminal or C-terminal His-tag

  • Transform into E. coli BL21(DE3) or similar expression strain

  • Grow cultures in iron-supplemented media (50-100 μM ferric ammonium citrate)

  • Induce at OD₆₀₀ of 0.6-0.8 with 0.1-0.5 mM IPTG

  • Continue expression at 18°C for 16-20 hours

  • Harvest and lyse cells under anaerobic conditions to preserve iron-sulfur cluster integrity

  • Purify using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography followed by size exclusion chromatography

This approach typically yields 2-5 mg of pure protein per liter of culture with properly incorporated iron-sulfur clusters.

What spectroscopic methods can confirm proper folding and cofactor incorporation in recombinant N. farcinica LipA?

Verification of proper folding and cofactor incorporation is essential for functional studies of LipA. The following spectroscopic techniques provide complementary information:

UV-Visible Absorption Spectroscopy:

  • [4Fe-4S] clusters exhibit characteristic absorption bands at approximately 320-450 nm

  • A shoulder at ~420 nm indicates the presence of intact [4Fe-4S] clusters

  • The A₄₂₀/A₂₈₀ ratio provides an estimate of cluster incorporation efficiency

Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) Spectroscopy:

  • Native LipA contains a mixture of [3Fe-4S] and [4Fe-4S] cluster states

  • Reduction with sodium dithionite generates detectable S = 1/2 [4Fe-4S]¹⁺ signals

  • The majority of the protein contains S = 0 [4Fe-4S]²⁺ clusters, which are EPR-silent

Circular Dichroism (CD) Spectroscopy:

  • Far-UV CD (190-250 nm) confirms secondary structure elements

  • Visible CD (300-700 nm) provides additional information about iron-sulfur cluster environment

Iron and Sulfide Quantification:

  • Colorimetric assays for iron (typically 8 Fe atoms per dimer)

  • Acid-labile sulfide determination (approximately equivalent to iron content)

When properly expressed and folded, N. farcinica LipA should contain approximately four iron atoms per polypeptide with similar amounts of acid-labile sulfide .

What is the mechanism of sulfur insertion by N. farcinica LipA and how can it be experimentally validated?

The mechanism of sulfur insertion by N. farcinica LipA involves a radical-mediated process that occurs in two distinct steps, inserting sulfur atoms at C6 and C8 positions of the octanoyl substrate. Based on crystallographic evidence and biochemical studies, the following mechanistic model has been established:

  • The primary [4Fe-4S] cluster interacts with AdoMet to generate a 5'-deoxyadenosyl radical

  • This radical abstracts a hydrogen atom from the target carbon (C6 or C8) of the octanoyl substrate

  • The resulting carbon-centered radical attacks a sulfur atom in the auxiliary [4Fe-4S] cluster

  • This leads to the incorporation of sulfur and destruction of the auxiliary cluster

Experimental validation approaches:

  • Site-directed mutagenesis: Mutate the serine residue that coordinates with the auxiliary cluster to evaluate its role in the reaction mechanism.

  • Intermediates trapping: Use rapid freeze-quench techniques coupled with EPR spectroscopy to capture radical intermediates during the reaction.

  • Substrate analogs: Employ octanoyl derivatives with deuterium at specific positions to measure kinetic isotope effects and confirm the sites of hydrogen abstraction.

  • Crystallographic studies: Obtain snapshots of the enzyme at different catalytic stages using substrate analogs that allow only partial reactions.

  • Mass spectrometry: Track the incorporation of isotopically labeled sulfur from the auxiliary cluster into the substrate product.

These approaches can be integrated to develop a comprehensive understanding of the unique "destructive" mechanism whereby LipA sacrifices its own iron-sulfur cluster to provide sulfur atoms for lipoyl formation.

How can researchers optimize crystallization conditions for N. farcinica LipA structural studies?

Obtaining high-quality crystals of N. farcinica LipA requires careful consideration of its oxygen sensitivity and iron-sulfur cluster integrity. Based on successful crystallization of related LipA enzymes, the following approach is recommended:

Protein preparation:

  • Express and purify LipA under strictly anaerobic conditions

  • Verify iron-sulfur cluster integrity by UV-visible spectroscopy

  • Concentrate to 10-15 mg/mL in a buffer containing 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, and 2 mM DTT

Crystallization strategy:

ParameterInitial ScreenOptimization Range
Temperature18°C4-25°C
Drop size1-2 μL1-5 μL
Protein:reservoir ratio1:11:1, 2:1, 1:2
PrecipitantsPEG 3350 (15-25%)PEG 3350 (10-30%)
Buffer0.1 M Bis-Tris pH 5.5-6.5pH 5.0-7.0
Additives0.2 M lithium sulfateVarious salts, 5-10% glycerol

Co-crystallization with substrates:

  • Pre-incubate LipA with octanoyl substrate (1-2 mM)

  • Add AdoMet (1-2 mM) for capturing intermediate states

  • Set up crystallization under anaerobic conditions

  • Consider microseeding from initial crystals to improve quality

Cryoprotection and data collection:

  • Use mother liquor supplemented with 20-25% glycerol or ethylene glycol

  • Flash-freeze crystals in liquid nitrogen

  • Collect data at synchrotron radiation facilities with capabilities for handling oxygen-sensitive samples

This approach has yielded high-resolution structures (1.64-2.28 Å) for Mycobacterium tuberculosis LipA and should be adaptable for N. farcinica LipA with minor modifications.

What strategies can be employed to study the catalytic intermediates of N. farcinica LipA?

Studying catalytic intermediates of N. farcinica LipA requires specialized techniques to capture the enzyme at different stages of its reaction cycle. The following strategies have proven effective:

1. Single-turnover reaction conditions:

  • Strictly control the ratio of AdoMet to enzyme (1:1) to allow for only the first sulfur insertion

  • Use substrate analogs that can undergo the first insertion but not the second

  • Perform reactions under anaerobic conditions at reduced temperatures (4-10°C) to slow the reaction

2. Spectroscopic monitoring of reaction progress:

  • UV-visible spectroscopy to track changes in the iron-sulfur cluster absorption during catalysis

  • EPR spectroscopy to monitor radical formation and auxiliary cluster degradation

  • Mössbauer spectroscopy to characterize changes in iron coordination environment

3. Mass spectrometry approaches:

  • MALDI mass spectrometry of the substrate before and after reaction to confirm sulfur incorporation

  • Use of isotopically labeled substrates (¹³C, ²H, or ¹⁵N) to track specific atoms during the reaction

  • HPLC-MS/MS analysis of reaction products to identify and quantify intermediates

4. Structural biology methods:

  • X-ray crystallography of enzyme-substrate complexes at different reaction stages

  • Cryo-EM analysis of larger LipA complexes with protein substrates

  • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to monitor conformational changes during catalysis

These approaches have revealed that during the first sulfur insertion, the serine ligand dissociates from the auxiliary cluster, an iron ion is lost, and a sulfur atom (still part of the cluster) becomes covalently attached to C6 of the octanoyl substrate .

How does the lipA gene organization in N. farcinica compare to other bacterial species?

The organization of the lipA gene in N. farcinica and its genomic context provides important insights into its regulation and evolutionary relationships. Comparative genomic analysis reveals:

N. farcinica lipA genomic context:

  • The lipA gene in N. farcinica is part of a biosynthetic gene cluster that includes other genes involved in iron metabolism and siderophore production

  • It shares significant homology with mycobactin biosynthesis genes found in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

  • The gene cluster (cluster I) includes multiple genes designated nbtA, -B, -C, -D, -E, -F, -G, and -H

Comparison with other bacterial species:

SpecieslipA LocationAssociated GenesRegulatory Elements
N. farcinicaPart of nbt clusternbtA-H genes for siderophore biosynthesisIdeR-binding sequences
E. coliSingle gene locusPart of lipoic acid biosynthesis operonOxygen-responsive elements
M. tuberculosisPart of mycobactin clustermbt genes for siderophore biosynthesisIdeR-binding sequences

Regulatory features:

  • Putative IdeR-binding sequences (iron-dependent regulator) have been identified upstream of the nbtA, -G, -H, -S, and -T genes in N. farcinica

  • This suggests regulation by iron availability, consistent with the enzyme's requirement for iron-sulfur clusters

  • The evolutionary conservation of these regulatory elements highlights the importance of LipA in bacterial metabolism and pathogenicity

The genomic organization of lipA in N. farcinica provides potential targets for genetic manipulation to study the enzyme's physiological role and regulation in this opportunistic pathogen.

What approaches can be used to study the role of LipA in N. farcinica pathogenicity?

Understanding the contribution of LipA to N. farcinica pathogenicity requires integrated approaches spanning molecular genetics, biochemistry, and infection models:

Genetic manipulation strategies:

  • Gene disruption: Target the nbtA or nbtE genes using homologous recombination to create knockout strains

  • Complementation studies: Reintroduce functional lipA to confirm phenotype restoration

  • Conditional expression systems: Create strains with inducible lipA expression to study dosage effects

In vitro infection models:

  • Macrophage infection assays using J774A.1 cells (or similar cell lines) to assess intracellular survival

  • Growth rate comparison in iron-limited media to evaluate siderophore function

  • Biofilm formation assays to assess potential contributions to persistence

Molecular and biochemical approaches:

  • Heterologous expression of lipA in surrogate hosts like Streptomyces avermitilis to study enzyme function

  • Lipidomics analysis to characterize changes in lipoylated proteins and metabolic pathways

  • Transcriptomics to identify genes co-regulated with lipA under different conditions

Clinical relevance assessment:

  • Analyze lipA sequence variations in clinical isolates from different infection sites

  • Compare virulence between wild-type and lipA-deficient strains in appropriate animal models

  • Evaluate antibiotic susceptibility profiles in relation to lipA expression levels

Previous studies have demonstrated that disruptions of nbtA and nbtE genes, related to siderophore biosynthesis in N. farcinica, reduced and abolished productivity of nocobactin NA, respectively . Similar approaches can be applied to study LipA's specific contribution to pathogenicity, especially considering that N. farcinica can cause severe disseminated infections with high mortality rates (39%) even with aggressive antibiotic therapy .

What assay systems can be used to measure N. farcinica LipA activity in vitro?

Several complementary assay systems can be employed to measure the enzymatic activity of recombinant N. farcinica LipA:

1. Coupled enzyme assay with lipoate-protein ligase:

  • Principle: LipA generates lipoyl groups from octanoyl-ACP, which can be transferred to apo-proteins by lipoate-protein ligase

  • Procedure:

    • Incubate sodium dithionite-reduced LipA with octanoyl-ACP, lipoyl transferase (LipB), apo-pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (apo-PDC), and S-adenosyl methionine (AdoMet)

    • Detect lipoylated PDC formation through activity measurements or immunoblotting

    • Confirm lipoylation by MALDI mass spectrometry of the lipoyl-binding domain

2. Direct detection of lipoylated proteins:

  • Principle: Antibodies against lipoyl groups can detect the product of the LipA reaction

  • Components needed:

    • Anti-lipoic acid antibodies

    • Recombinant substrate proteins (e.g., lipoyl domain of pyruvate dehydrogenase)

    • Octanoylated substrate (enzymatically prepared)

    • AdoMet and reducing system

3. Mass spectrometry-based assay:

  • Principle: Direct detection of mass shifts corresponding to sulfur incorporation

  • Advantage: Can distinguish between mono-sulfurated (intermediate) and di-sulfurated (final) products

  • Method:

    • React LipA with octanoylated substrate proteins

    • Digest with proteases to generate peptide fragments

    • Analyze by LC-MS/MS to identify and quantify lipoylated peptides

4. Spectroscopic monitoring of iron-sulfur cluster degradation:

  • Principle: As LipA uses its auxiliary cluster as a sulfur source, changes in UV-visible absorption spectra occur

  • Implementation:

    • Record baseline spectrum of purified LipA (characteristic [4Fe-4S] features)

    • Add substrate and AdoMet under anaerobic conditions

    • Monitor spectral changes at 300-450 nm over time

    • Correlate cluster degradation with product formation

The most reliable assessment combines multiple approaches, with the coupled enzyme assay providing functional confirmation and mass spectrometry offering precise molecular characterization of the reaction products.

How can researchers purify active recombinant N. farcinica LipA with intact iron-sulfur clusters?

Purification of catalytically active N. farcinica LipA with intact iron-sulfur clusters requires specialized techniques to prevent cluster degradation. The following protocol has been successful for related LipA enzymes:

Purification protocol:

  • Cell lysis under anaerobic conditions:

    • Resuspend cell paste in anaerobic buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 1 mM DTT)

    • Add lysozyme (1 mg/mL) and DNase I (10 μg/mL)

    • Lyse cells using sonication or French press in an anaerobic chamber

    • Centrifuge at 40,000 × g for 45 minutes at 4°C

  • Affinity chromatography:

    • Load clarified lysate onto Ni-NTA resin equilibrated with lysis buffer

    • Wash with 10 column volumes of wash buffer (lysis buffer + 20 mM imidazole)

    • Elute with elution buffer (lysis buffer + 250 mM imidazole)

    • Monitor brown coloration indicating iron-sulfur cluster retention

  • Iron-sulfur cluster reconstitution (if needed):

    • Incubate purified protein with 10-fold excess FeCl₃ and Na₂S

    • Add DTT to 5 mM final concentration

    • Incubate at 4°C for 4 hours in an anaerobic chamber

    • Remove excess iron and sulfide by dialysis or gel filtration

  • Size exclusion chromatography:

    • Apply concentrated protein to Superdex 200 column

    • Elute with anaerobic buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 1 mM DTT)

    • Collect fractions containing monomeric and dimeric species

  • Quality control assessment:

    • UV-visible spectroscopy to confirm [4Fe-4S] cluster presence

    • Iron and sulfide quantification (expect approximately four iron atoms per LipA polypeptide)

    • Activity assay to confirm functional enzyme

This protocol typically yields protein with a mixture of monomeric and dimeric species that contain both [3Fe-4S] and [4Fe-4S] cluster states, consistent with the native enzyme properties .

What experimental design considerations are important when studying the dual iron-sulfur clusters in N. farcinica LipA?

The presence of two distinct iron-sulfur clusters in LipA—one for radical generation and one serving as a sulfur donor—creates unique experimental challenges. The following considerations are essential for rigorous investigation:

1. Distinguishing between the two clusters:

  • Use site-directed mutagenesis to selectively disrupt binding sites for each cluster

  • Apply spectroscopic techniques (EPR, Mössbauer) that can differentiate the electronic environment of each cluster

  • Design experiments that can track the fate of each cluster independently

2. Maintaining anaerobic conditions:

  • Conduct all purification, storage, and experimental procedures in an anaerobic chamber

  • Include oxygen scavengers (glucose oxidase/catalase system) in reaction buffers

  • Use gastight syringes and sealed cuvettes for spectroscopic measurements

  • Monitor oxygen levels using resazurin or similar indicators

3. Kinetic considerations:

  • Design experiments that can capture the first sulfur insertion before the second occurs

  • Control AdoMet:enzyme ratio carefully to limit turnover

  • Use rapid kinetic techniques (stopped-flow, freeze-quench) to capture transient intermediates

4. Substrate preparation:

  • Prepare octanoylated protein substrates enzymatically rather than chemically

  • Verify substrate modification state by mass spectrometry

  • Consider the use of substrate analogs that can separate the two sulfur insertion steps

5. Data interpretation challenges:

  • Account for the heterogeneity of iron-sulfur cluster states in the protein population

  • Distinguish between effects on catalysis versus effects on cluster stability

  • Consider the self-sacrificial nature of the auxiliary cluster when interpreting kinetic data

6. Experimental controls:

  • Include negative controls lacking AdoMet or substrate

  • Use LipA variants with mutations in the auxiliary cluster binding residues

  • Compare results with LipA homologs from other organisms

These considerations should be integrated into experimental designs to ensure reliable and interpretable results when studying the dual iron-sulfur clusters in N. farcinica LipA.

How might understanding N. farcinica LipA mechanism contribute to novel antimicrobial strategies?

The unique mechanism of LipA, particularly its reliance on iron-sulfur clusters and self-sacrificial sulfur donation, presents several opportunities for antimicrobial development:

Targeting LipA for antimicrobial development:

  • LipA inhibition would disrupt the biosynthesis of lipoic acid, an essential cofactor for central metabolic enzymes

  • The unique radical SAM mechanism and iron-sulfur cluster dependency present potential selective targets

  • N. farcinica is an opportunistic pathogen with increasing clinical relevance, particularly in immunocompromised patients

Potential therapeutic approaches:

  • Design of substrate analogs that can inactivate the enzyme by forming stable radical intermediates

  • Development of compounds that disrupt the unique serine ligation to the auxiliary iron-sulfur cluster

  • Creation of molecules that chelate iron specifically from LipA clusters without affecting human iron-containing proteins

Rationale for targeting LipA in N. farcinica infections:

  • N. farcinica causes severe, often disseminated infections with high mortality rates (39%)

  • Current treatments primarily rely on trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, with alternatives including imipenem/cilastatin and linezolid

  • Treatment failures and allergies to sulfonamides necessitate alternative approaches

  • The unique biochemistry of LipA provides targets not present in human metabolism

Challenges and considerations:

  • Need to achieve selectivity for bacterial LipA over human iron-sulfur proteins

  • Requirement for compounds that can penetrate N. farcinica's complex cell wall

  • Potential for resistance development through alternative metabolic pathways

  • Delivery challenges for compounds targeting an intracellular enzyme

By elucidating the structural and mechanistic details of N. farcinica LipA, researchers can identify unique vulnerabilities that may lead to novel therapeutic strategies against this challenging opportunistic pathogen.

What role might LipA play in the physiology and virulence of N. farcinica?

Understanding the physiological role of LipA in N. farcinica provides insights into bacterial metabolism and potential connections to virulence:

Metabolic significance:

  • LipA synthesizes lipoic acid, a cofactor essential for multiple enzyme complexes including:

    • Pyruvate dehydrogenase (linking glycolysis to TCA cycle)

    • α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase (TCA cycle)

    • Branched-chain α-keto acid dehydrogenase (amino acid metabolism)

    • Glycine cleavage system (one-carbon metabolism)

  • These enzymes are central to energy production and biosynthetic pathways, especially under aerobic conditions

Connection to virulence:

  • N. farcinica is an opportunistic pathogen causing severe infections in immunocompromised hosts (88% of reported cases)

  • Lipoic acid-dependent enzymes may be particularly important during infection:

    • For adaptation to different nutrient environments within the host

    • For response to oxidative stress during host immune response

    • For metabolism of host-derived carbon sources

  • The co-regulation of lipA with siderophore biosynthesis genes suggests coordination between iron acquisition and central metabolism

Evidence from related pathogenic bacteria:

  • In M. tuberculosis, disruption of lipoic acid biosynthesis attenuates virulence

  • The ability to synthesize lipoic acid de novo provides an advantage in iron-limited environments

  • Lipoylated proteins are targets of the host immune response in some bacterial infections

Implications for N. farcinica pathogenesis:

  • N. farcinica can cause disseminated infection, indicating ability to adapt to diverse host environments

  • Metabolic flexibility enabled by lipoic acid-dependent enzymes may contribute to persistent infection

  • The high mortality rate (39%) associated with N. farcinica infections suggests robust mechanisms for evading host defenses

Understanding the specific role of LipA in N. farcinica virulence could identify new approaches for attenuating infection and could help explain the particular virulence of this organism in specific patient populations.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2024 Thebiotek. All Rights Reserved.