The protein is expressed in E. coli using an in vitro expression system, ensuring high purity and yield .
Antibiotic Target Studies: ATP synthase is a potential target for novel antimicrobials due to its essential role in energy production .
Structural Biology: Used in crystallography and cryo-EM to map proton translocation mechanisms .
Immunogenicity: Serves as an antigen in serological assays for O. anthropi infection diagnostics .
The atpB2 gene is located on the primary chromosome of O. anthropi ATCC 49188 (GenBank CP000758-CP000763) . Notably, the genome includes plasmids (pOAN01–pOAN04) encoding virulence factors, though atpB2 itself is not plasmid-associated .
KEGG: oan:Oant_2514
STRING: 439375.Oant_2514
Recombinant Ochrobactrum anthropi atpB2 is typically expressed in E. coli expression systems . The process generally follows these methodological steps:
Gene cloning: The atpB2 gene (Oant_2514) is amplified from O. anthropi genomic DNA and cloned into an appropriate expression vector with an N-terminal His-tag.
Expression conditions: The recombinant protein is expressed in E. coli using optimized conditions, often employing a tightly regulated expression system to control protein production .
Purification process:
Initial cell lysis under conditions that maintain protein stability
Affinity chromatography using the His-tag for primary purification
Potential secondary purification steps such as ion-exchange chromatography
Final purification by size exclusion chromatography may be employed
Quality control: The purified protein is assessed for:
Storage: The purified protein is typically lyophilized or stored in a buffer containing stabilizers such as trehalose (6%) at pH 8.0, and stored at -20°C/-80°C for long-term stability .
Based on established protocols for recombinant atpB2 protein, the following storage and handling conditions are recommended to maintain optimal stability and activity :
Storage conditions:
Store lyophilized protein at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt
For extended storage periods, maintain at -80°C
Working aliquots can be stored at 4°C for up to one week
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles which can significantly reduce protein activity and stability
Reconstitution protocol:
Briefly centrifuge the vial prior to opening to bring contents to the bottom
Reconstitute the lyophilized protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (50% is standard) to prevent freeze-thaw damage
Aliquot into small volumes to minimize freeze-thaw cycles
Buffer conditions:
Storage buffer typically consists of Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% trehalose at pH 8.0
For recombinant protein applications, Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol is also used
Handling precautions:
Minimize exposure to room temperature
Avoid contamination
Use sterile techniques when preparing aliquots
Track the number of freeze-thaw cycles for each aliquot
While the search results don't provide specific information about crystallization of atpB2, based on general approaches for membrane proteins and ATP synthase components, the following methodological framework would be applicable:
Structural biology approaches for atpB2:
X-ray crystallography preparation:
Detergent screening is critical for membrane protein crystallization
Vapor diffusion methods (hanging or sitting drop)
Lipidic cubic phase crystallization may be suitable for this membrane protein
Screening of various precipitants, pH conditions, and additives
Cryo-EM analysis:
Sample preparation with appropriate detergents or nanodiscs
Negative staining for initial assessment
Vitrification conditions optimization
High-resolution data collection strategies
NMR studies:
Isotopic labeling (15N, 13C) of the recombinant protein
Detergent micelle selection for optimal spectral quality
2D and 3D heteronuclear experiments for structural elucidation
Protein engineering considerations:
Creation of truncated constructs removing flexible regions
Introduction of mutations to improve crystal contacts
Fusion protein approaches (e.g., with T4 lysozyme) to enhance crystallizability
For membrane proteins like atpB2, successful crystallization often requires extensive optimization of detergent conditions and careful consideration of the protein's amphipathic nature. Collaborations with structural biology groups experienced in membrane protein crystallization would be beneficial.
Investigating the interactions between atpB2 and other ATP synthase subunits requires comprehensive experimental approaches:
Co-immunoprecipitation studies:
Use of anti-His antibodies to pull down His-tagged atpB2
Western blot analysis to identify co-precipitated subunits
Crosslinking prior to co-IP to capture transient interactions
Bacterial two-hybrid systems:
Adaptation of the system for membrane protein interactions
Systematic testing of interactions with other ATP synthase subunits
Controls to verify specificity of interactions
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR):
Immobilization of His-tagged atpB2 on Ni-NTA sensor chips
Measurement of binding kinetics with other purified subunits
Determination of binding constants under various conditions
Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET):
Labeling of atpB2 and potential interaction partners
Measurement of energy transfer efficiency as indicator of proximity
Live-cell FRET to observe interactions in native environment
Reconstitution experiments:
Purification of individual ATP synthase components
Systematic reconstitution to identify minimal functional units
Activity assays to correlate subunit interactions with function
Structural analysis:
Cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry to map interaction surfaces
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to identify binding interfaces
Molecular modeling based on known ATP synthase structures
These approaches would provide complementary data on the interaction network of atpB2 within the ATP synthase complex of O. anthropi.
While specific comparative data for atpB2 across species is not directly provided in the search results, a methodological framework for such comparison includes:
Sequence analysis and evolutionary conservation:
Multiple sequence alignment of atpB2 with homologous proteins
Identification of conserved domains and residues across bacterial species
Phylogenetic analysis to determine evolutionary relationships
Structural comparison:
Homology modeling based on known ATP synthase structures
Comparison of predicted secondary and tertiary structures
Analysis of species-specific structural features
Functional comparisons:
Heterologous expression studies in ATP synthase-deficient strains
Complementation assays to test functional interchangeability
Measurement of ATP synthesis/hydrolysis rates across species variants
Adaptation to environmental conditions:
Regulatory mechanisms:
Comparison of gene regulation across bacterial species
Analysis of operon structures and transcriptional control
Investigation of post-translational modifications
These comparative approaches would provide insights into how atpB2 function in O. anthropi relates to ATP synthase function in other bacteria, potentially revealing adaptations specific to O. anthropi's ecological niche and pathogenic potential.
Based on the available information and general principles for membrane protein expression:
Expression system optimization:
Vector and promoter selection:
Induction parameters:
Media and growth conditions:
Evaluation of different media formulations (LB, TB, auto-induction media)
Testing of different growth phases for induction (mid-log vs. late-log)
Supplementation with specific ions or cofactors that might stabilize the protein
Solubilization strategies:
Screening of detergents for optimal solubilization
Co-expression with chaperones to improve folding
Use of fusion partners that enhance solubility
Systematic optimization of these parameters through factorial experimental design would help identify conditions that maximize the yield of functional recombinant atpB2.
When encountering difficulties with atpB2 expression or purification, consider the following systematic troubleshooting approaches:
Expression Troubleshooting:
Low expression levels:
Protein aggregation/inclusion bodies:
Reduce expression temperature (16-20°C)
Decrease inducer concentration
Co-express with molecular chaperones
Test expression as fusion with solubility-enhancing tags
Implement slow induction methods (e.g., auto-induction media)
Protein degradation:
Add protease inhibitors during cell lysis
Use protease-deficient host strains
Modify construct design to remove protease-sensitive regions
Optimize lysis and purification buffers
Purification Troubleshooting:
Poor binding to affinity resin:
Verify tag accessibility (consider tag position change)
Optimize binding conditions (pH, salt concentration)
Test different affinity resins
Ensure His-tag is not cleaved during expression
Impurities in purified protein:
Implement additional purification steps (ion exchange, size exclusion)
Increase washing stringency
Test different elution conditions
Consider on-column refolding approaches
Protein instability after purification:
Loss of activity:
Verify proper folding using biophysical methods
Test activity immediately after purification
Optimize storage conditions to maintain activity
Consider rapid freezing methods to preserve structure
Systematic documentation of each troubleshooting iteration is essential for identifying patterns and successful approaches.
While the search results don't provide specific activity assays for atpB2, the following methodological approaches would be applicable based on the protein's function:
ATP synthesis/hydrolysis assays:
Reconstitution of purified atpB2 with other ATP synthase subunits
Measurement of ATP synthesis in proteoliposomes under proton gradient
Coupled enzyme assays to monitor ATP hydrolysis activity
Real-time monitoring using luminescence-based ATP detection
Proton translocation assays:
Reconstitution into liposomes with pH-sensitive fluorescent dyes
Measurement of proton flux using pH electrode systems
Stopped-flow spectroscopy to measure rapid proton translocation kinetics
Patch-clamp electrophysiology for direct measurement of proton currents
Structural integrity assessment:
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to verify secondary structure
Fluorescence spectroscopy to assess tertiary structure
Differential scanning calorimetry to determine thermal stability
Limited proteolysis to probe folding quality
Binding assays:
Surface plasmon resonance to measure interactions with other subunits
Isothermal titration calorimetry to determine binding thermodynamics
Microscale thermophoresis for quantitative binding analysis
Pull-down assays to verify interactions with physiological partners
Functional complementation:
Expression in ATP synthase-deficient bacterial strains
Assessment of respiratory growth rescue
Measurement of membrane potential restoration
Evaluation of ATP synthesis in complemented strains
These methodological approaches provide a comprehensive assessment of atpB2 functionality from multiple perspectives, ensuring that the purified protein retains its native biological activity.
Based on the available information and general knowledge of bacterial ATP synthases:
Subunit composition comparison:
O. anthropi's ATP synthase appears to have two variants of subunit a (atpB1 and atpB2) , which is not uncommon in bacteria but may reflect specific adaptations
Comparative genomic analysis would reveal the complete subunit composition
The evolutionary relationship between the different a subunits could provide insights into functional specialization
Gene organization and regulation:
O. anthropi possesses tightly regulated expression systems that have been engineered using the lacI(q) gene and re-engineered coliphage T5 promoters
This regulatory system allows for controlled expression with up to 57-fold increase when induced
The degree of induction can be precisely controlled by varying IPTG concentration
Evolutionary adaptations:
O. anthropi is versatile with strains living in diverse habitats and is increasingly recognized as an opportunistic pathogen
Multilocus sequence typing suggests an epidemic population structure with a major clonal complex corresponding to a human-associated lineage
These adaptive features may be reflected in its energy metabolism systems, including ATP synthase
Functional specialization:
The presence of multiple atpB variants suggests possible functional specialization
Different subunits might be expressed under different environmental conditions
Research on purification and characterization of various enzymes from O. anthropi (e.g., purine nucleosidase) demonstrates the organism's metabolic versatility
A systematic comparative genomics and proteomics approach would provide deeper insights into how O. anthropi's ATP synthase system has adapted to its versatile lifestyle and potential pathogenic role.
The search results don't specifically mention biotechnological applications of atpB2, but based on general applications of ATP synthase components and O. anthropi's characteristics, the following applications could be relevant:
Bioenergy applications:
Development of biomimetic energy conversion systems inspired by ATP synthase
Engineering of hybrid systems for improved ATP production efficiency
Creation of nanomotors based on the rotary mechanism of ATP synthase
Biosensing platforms:
Utilization of ATP synthase components as biological recognition elements
Development of proton gradient sensors for environmental monitoring
Creation of drug screening platforms targeting energy metabolism
Therapeutic targets:
Protein engineering:
Structure-guided engineering of ATP synthase components for enhanced stability
Development of chimeric proteins with novel functions
Design of minimal ATP synthase systems for synthetic biology applications
Bioremediation and environmental applications:
Exploitation of O. anthropi's versatility for bioremediation processes
Development of engineered strains with modified energy metabolism for specific applications
Creation of biosensors for environmental monitoring based on ATP synthase activity
Research in these areas would benefit from the availability of well-characterized recombinant proteins like atpB2 and the development of expression systems for O. anthropi as described in the search results .
Given that O. anthropi is increasingly recognized as an opportunistic pathogen in hospitalized patients , investigating atpB2's role in pathogenicity involves:
Gene knockout and complementation studies:
Creation of atpB2 deletion mutants using targeted gene replacement
Phenotypic characterization of mutants under various growth conditions
Complementation studies to confirm gene-phenotype relationships
Use of the tightly regulated expression system developed for O. anthropi to control gene expression levels
Virulence assessment:
Infection models to compare wild-type and atpB2 mutant strains
Measurement of bacterial survival in host-mimicking conditions
Assessment of biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance
Evaluation of host immune response to wild-type vs. mutant strains
Structural analysis for drug targeting:
Identification of atpB2 structural features distinct from human ATP synthase
In silico screening for compounds binding to unique bacterial epitopes
Structure-activity relationship studies of potential inhibitors
Crystallization and structural determination to guide drug design
Population biology approaches:
Analysis of atpB2 sequence variation among clinical isolates
Correlation of sequence variants with pathogenicity or host adaptation
Application of multilocus sequence typing to identify lineages with enhanced virulence
Genomic fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to distinguish isolates
Host-pathogen interaction studies:
Investigation of host immune recognition of atpB2
Analysis of atpB2 expression during different infection stages
Identification of potential post-translational modifications affecting virulence
Study of atpB2's potential role in adaptation to the host environment
These approaches would provide comprehensive insights into atpB2's role in O. anthropi pathogenicity and evaluate its potential as a therapeutic target for this emerging opportunistic pathogen.
The following detailed protocol outlines the recommended approach for site-directed mutagenesis of atpB2:
Materials Required:
Recombinant plasmid containing atpB2 gene
High-fidelity DNA polymerase (e.g., Pfu Ultra, Q5)
Mutagenic primers (forward and reverse)
DpnI restriction enzyme
Competent E. coli cells
Selection antibiotics
PCR thermal cycler
DNA purification kits
Protocol Steps:
Primer Design:
Design complementary primers containing the desired mutation
Ensure 15-20 bases of perfect complementarity on each side of the mutation
Verify primer properties (Tm, GC content, secondary structures)
Consider codon optimization for E. coli expression
DpnI Digestion:
Add 1 μl DpnI (10 units) directly to PCR product
Incubate at 37°C for 1-2 hours to digest methylated parental DNA
Heat-inactivate DpnI at 80°C for 20 minutes
Transformation:
Transform 5 μl of DpnI-treated product into competent E. coli cells
Plate on selective media containing appropriate antibiotics
Incubate at 37°C overnight
Colony Screening:
Pick 5-10 colonies for plasmid isolation
Perform restriction analysis to verify plasmid integrity
Sequence the entire atpB2 gene to confirm:
Presence of the desired mutation
Absence of unwanted mutations
Protein Expression Verification:
Functional Analysis:
This comprehensive protocol ensures reliable generation and verification of atpB2 mutants for structure-function studies.
To study the membrane integration and topology of atpB2, the following methodological approaches are recommended:
Computational prediction analysis:
Hydropathy plot analysis to identify potential transmembrane segments
Topology prediction algorithms (TMHMM, TOPCONS, Phobius)
Signal peptide prediction (SignalP)
Comparison with known ATP synthase subunit a structures
Biochemical approaches:
Protease protection assays:
Express atpB2 in membrane vesicles
Treat with proteases in presence/absence of detergents
Analyze protected fragments by mass spectrometry
Identify regions exposed to cytoplasm vs. periplasm
Chemical labeling:
Use membrane-impermeable biotinylation reagents
Identify accessible lysine or cysteine residues
Compare labeling patterns in intact cells vs. permeabilized cells
Map labeled residues to structural models
Genetic approaches:
Reporter fusion analysis:
Create series of C-terminal truncations fused to reporter proteins
Use dual reporters (e.g., GFP, PhoA) with opposite topology requirements
Systematically map membrane-spanning segments
Validate with site-directed mutagenesis of key residues
Substituted cysteine accessibility method (SCAM):
Replace native cysteines with alanines
Introduce single cysteines at positions of interest
Probe with membrane-permeable/impermeable sulfhydryl reagents
Determine accessibility from each side of membrane
Biophysical methods:
FRET analysis:
Label specific residues with fluorescent pairs
Measure energy transfer efficiency
Determine distances between labeled positions
Map to structural models
EPR spectroscopy:
Introduce spin labels at specific positions
Measure accessibility to paramagnetic reagents
Determine depth of residues in membrane
Develop constraint-based structural models
Direct structural analysis:
Cryo-EM of reconstituted complexes:
Reconstitute purified atpB2 into nanodiscs or liposomes
Determine structure by cryo-EM
Map transmembrane helices and orientations
Compare with existing ATP synthase structures
These complementary approaches provide comprehensive insights into atpB2 membrane topology and integration, essential for understanding its structure-function relationship.
The following detailed protocol outlines the recommended procedure for reconstituting atpB2 into liposomes for functional studies:
Materials Required:
Synthetic phospholipids (e.g., POPC, POPE, E. coli total lipid extract)
Detergents (e.g., n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside, Triton X-100)
Bio-Beads SM-2 or other detergent adsorbents
Buffer components (HEPES, KCl, MgCl₂)
Ultracentrifuge and rotors
Extrusion apparatus with polycarbonate filters
Fluorescent probes for functional assays
Reconstitution Protocol:
This detailed protocol provides a methodological foundation for reconstituting atpB2 into liposomes for functional studies, with considerations for protein stability based on the handling recommendations for the recombinant protein .