The recombinant Oryza sativa subsp. japonica ATP synthase subunit c, chloroplastic (atpH) is a biologically engineered protein derived from rice. It belongs to the ATP synthase complex, specifically the F₀ sector, which facilitates proton translocation across chloroplast membranes to drive ATP synthesis . This protein is produced via recombinant expression in heterologous systems, such as E. coli, yeast, or mammalian cells, and is His-tagged for purification and functional studies .
The full-length atpH protein (1–81 amino acids) is fused to an N-terminal His tag for affinity chromatography. Its amino acid sequence is:
MNPLIAAASVIAAGLAVGLASIGPGVGQGTAAGQAVEGIARQPEAEGKIRGTLLLSLAFMEALTIYGLVVALALLFANPFV .
Key identifiers include:
Attribute | Value |
---|---|
UniProt ID | P0C301 (subsp. japonica) |
Molecular Weight | ~9.3 kDa (estimated) |
Purity | >90% (SDS-PAGE confirmed) |
Storage Buffer | Tris/PBS + 6% trehalose, pH 8.0 |
The atpH subunit forms part of the c-ring, a homomeric structure within the F₀ sector that rotates during proton translocation. This motion drives ATP synthesis in the F₁ sector via a central stalk mechanism . In plants, the c-ring typically comprises 10–14 subunits, creating a proton channel with high efficiency .
The atpH subunit directly participates in:
Proton Translocation: Forms a channel for H⁺ movement across the thylakoid membrane, establishing a proton gradient .
ATP Synthesis: Couples proton flux to ATP production through rotational energy transfer to the F₁ ATP synthase .
Stress Adaptation: Modulates ATPase activity under salt stress, balancing energy production and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation .
Under salt stress, Oryza sativa exhibits upregulated ATP synthase activity to maintain cellular energy homeostasis. Proteomic studies show increased atpH abundance, correlating with enhanced cyclic electron flow around photosystem I (PSI) to prioritize ATP synthesis over NADPH production .
The protein is commercially available in multiple formats:
SDS-PAGE: Used to verify purity (>90%) and confirm subunit migration patterns .
Enzymatic Assays: Measures ATP synthase activity under varying proton gradients .
Structural Studies: His-tagged variants enable crystallography or cryo-EM analysis .
A proteomic study of Oryza sativa under salt stress identified atpH as a critical component in:
Recombinant atpH exhibits exceptional stability, enabling reproducible experimental results. Its activity is maintained in Tris/PBS buffers with 50% glycerol, though repeated freeze-thaw cycles are discouraged .
KEGG: osa:3131392
STRING: 39947.LOC_Osp1g00290.1
ATP synthase subunit c, encoded by the atpH gene, is a critical component of the chloroplastic ATP synthase complex in Oryza sativa subsp. japonica (japonica rice). This protein functions as part of the membrane-embedded F0 portion of the ATP synthase, forming an oligomeric ring structure that facilitates proton translocation across the thylakoid membrane. The rotation of this c-ring, driven by the proton gradient established during photosynthesis, enables the catalytic F1 portion to synthesize ATP from ADP and inorganic phosphate.
In chloroplasts, this protein plays an essential role in the final steps of the light-dependent reactions of photosynthesis, converting the energy stored in the proton gradient into chemical energy in the form of ATP. The chloroplastic ATP synthase complex represents a crucial intersection between the light-dependent and light-independent reactions of photosynthesis in rice and other plant species.
For researchers seeking to express recombinant ATP synthase subunit c from japonica rice, several expression systems have proven effective, each with distinct advantages depending on experimental objectives:
Bacterial Expression Systems:
E. coli-based expression systems remain the most common choice for initial studies due to their rapid growth, high protein yield, and cost-effectiveness. BL21(DE3) strains with pET vector systems are particularly useful for expressing the mature protein without the transit peptide sequence.
For membrane proteins like ATP synthase subunit c, E. coli C41(DE3) and C43(DE3) strains, specifically engineered for membrane protein expression, often yield better results by reducing toxicity issues.
Methodological Approach:
Clone the atpH coding sequence (without transit peptide) into an expression vector with an appropriate tag (His6, GST, or MBP).
Transform into the selected E. coli strain.
Optimize expression conditions: typically induction with 0.1-0.5 mM IPTG at OD600 of 0.6-0.8, followed by incubation at lower temperatures (16-20°C) to enhance proper folding.
Extract using mild detergents such as DDM (n-Dodecyl β-D-maltoside) or LDAO (Lauryldimethylamine oxide) to maintain protein integrity.
For functional studies requiring proper folding and post-translational modifications, plant-based expression systems like tobacco or rice cell cultures may be preferable, though with lower yields than bacterial systems.
The chloroplastic ATP synthase subunit c from japonica rice exhibits high sequence conservation with other crop species, reflecting its fundamental role in energy metabolism. Structural analysis reveals:
A compact protein (approximately 8 kDa) with two transmembrane α-helices connected by a hydrophilic loop
Highly conserved acidic residue (typically glutamate) in the second transmembrane helix that is essential for proton translocation
Sequence identity of approximately 95% with other cereal crops and 85-90% with dicotyledonous plants
The high degree of conservation reflects evolutionary constraints on this essential component of the cellular energy production machinery. Minor amino acid variations between species may contribute to differences in thermal stability or environmental adaptation but rarely affect the core functional domains.
Purification of membrane proteins like ATP synthase subunit c presents unique challenges requiring specialized approaches:
Recommended Purification Protocol:
Membrane Fraction Isolation: Following cell lysis, use differential centrifugation (40,000-100,000 × g) to isolate membrane fractions.
Solubilization Optimization: Test a panel of detergents at varying concentrations:
DDM (n-Dodecyl β-D-maltoside): 1-2% for initial solubilization
LMNG (Lauryl maltose neopentyl glycol): 0.5-1% for enhanced stability
SMA (Styrene-maleic acid) copolymers: For native lipid environment preservation
Affinity Chromatography: Utilize the fusion tag (typically His6) for initial purification on Ni-NTA resin with detergent concentrations maintained above CMC.
Size Exclusion Chromatography: Further purify using Superdex 75/200 columns to separate monomeric subunit c from oligomeric assemblies.
Stability Enhancement: Add lipids (POPC or native thylakoid lipids) at 0.1-0.5 mg/ml to stabilize the protein during storage.
Critical Parameter Monitoring:
pH should be maintained between 7.0-8.0 to prevent aggregation
Glycerol (10-20%) inclusion can enhance stability
Samples should be maintained at 4°C throughout purification to prevent degradation
Researchers should validate the structural integrity of purified protein through circular dichroism spectroscopy, which typically shows characteristic α-helical signatures with minima at 208 and 222 nm for properly folded ATP synthase subunit c.
To effectively study the interactions between ATP synthase subunit c and other components of the chloroplastic ATP synthase complex, researchers should consider these complementary approaches:
In Vitro Interaction Studies:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): Using antibodies against subunit c or other complex components to pull down interaction partners.
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR): For quantitative measurement of binding kinetics between purified components.
Microscale Thermophoresis (MST): Particularly useful for determining binding affinities in near-native conditions.
In Vivo Interaction Analysis:
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET): Tag subunit c and potential interaction partners with appropriate fluorophores to observe real-time interactions in chloroplasts.
Split-GFP Complementation: Fusion of complementary GFP fragments to subunit c and other complex components to visualize interactions through fluorescence restoration.
Chemical Cross-linking followed by Mass Spectrometry (XL-MS): To capture transient interactions within the native complex.
Structural Approaches:
Cryo-electron Microscopy: For visualizing the entire ATP synthase complex with subunit c in its native oligomeric state.
Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry (HDX-MS): To identify interaction interfaces through differential solvent accessibility.
When implementing these techniques, researchers should consider using site-directed mutagenesis to systematically alter key residues in subunit c to map interaction surfaces and assess functional consequences of disrupted interactions.
Comprehensive analysis of atpH expression patterns under environmental stress requires a multi-tiered approach:
Transcriptional Analysis Methods:
Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR):
Design primers specific to the atpH transcript region (avoiding homologous sequences)
Validate reference genes specific to stress conditions (common choices include Ubiquitin, Actin, or EF1α)
Implement the 2^-ΔΔCt method for relative quantification
RNA-Seq Analysis:
For genome-wide expression patterns revealing co-regulated genes
Minimum sequencing depth of 20 million reads per sample
Use DESeq2 or EdgeR for differential expression analysis with FDR < 0.05
Protein-Level Validation:
Western Blotting: Using antibodies specific to ATP synthase subunit c
Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM): For targeted proteomics quantification
Experimental Design Considerations:
Include appropriate time course sampling (early response: 1-6h; acclimation: 24-72h)
Apply gradual stress treatments when possible to mimic natural conditions
Include control conditions with proper biological replicates (minimum n=3)
Environmental Stress Conditions Relevant to Rice ATP Synthase Function:
Temperature stress (heat: 35-42°C; cold: 4-15°C)
Drought (withholding water or PEG treatment)
Salinity (100-200 mM NaCl)
Heavy metal exposure (particularly Cd²⁺ or As)
Integrating transcriptomics with metabolomics data (especially ATP/ADP ratios and photosynthetic parameters) provides a more comprehensive understanding of the physiological significance of atpH expression changes.
Marker-assisted selection represents a powerful approach for incorporating genes of interest, such as atpH, into rice breeding programs. Based on approaches demonstrated in japonica rice research, the following methodology is recommended:
Development of DNA Markers:
Polymorphism Identification: Begin by identifying SNPs, insertions/deletions, or SSRs in the atpH gene region through comparative sequencing of diverse japonica rice varieties.
Marker Design: Develop specific markers that can differentiate allelic variants:
SNP markers using CAPS (Cleaved Amplified Polymorphic Sequences) or dCAPS approaches
Insertion/deletion markers using length polymorphism detection
SSR markers based on variable repeat regions
Multiple regression analysis can be used to associate marker data with phenotypic traits, as demonstrated in research on eating quality traits in japonica rice . This approach achieved remarkable prediction accuracy with R² values as high as 0.99 for complex traits.
Validation Process:
Test markers across diverse germplasm to confirm polymorphism and association with target traits
Validate marker efficacy in breeding populations through phenotypic evaluation
Implement in breeding programs through early-generation selection
Table 1: Example of Multiple Regression Analysis for Marker-Trait Association
PCR Marker | Parameter Estimate | t Value | R² |
---|---|---|---|
Marker A | -16.97 ± 1.19 | -14.22** | 0.087 |
Marker B | -1.94 ± 0.60 | -3.25** | 0.096 |
Marker C | 26.55 ± 0.83 | 32.12** | 0.104 |
Marker D | -2.40 ± 0.56 | -4.33** | 0.060 |
Combined | 0.990 |
Note: ** indicates significance at 1% level .
When applying this methodology to genes like atpH, researchers should focus on linking molecular markers to relevant physiological traits such as photosynthetic efficiency, stress tolerance, or growth parameters that might be influenced by ATP synthase function.
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) of ATP synthase subunit c can significantly influence protein function, stability, and interactions. Researchers should employ these advanced analytical techniques for comprehensive PTM characterization:
Mass Spectrometry-Based Approaches:
Bottom-up Proteomics:
Enzymatic digestion (typically trypsin) followed by LC-MS/MS analysis
Precursor ion scanning for specific PTM-related mass shifts
Parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) for targeted analysis of modified peptides
Top-down Proteomics:
Analysis of intact protein to maintain PTM combinations and stoichiometry
High-resolution instruments (Orbitrap or FTICR) are essential
Electron transfer dissociation (ETD) fragmentation preserves labile modifications
PTM Enrichment Strategies:
Phosphorylation: TiO₂ or IMAC (Fe³⁺/Ga³⁺) enrichment
Glycosylation: Lectin affinity chromatography or hydrazide chemistry
Acetylation: Anti-acetyllysine antibody immunoprecipitation
Data Analysis Considerations:
Use multiple search algorithms (MASCOT, SEQUEST, MaxQuant) with appropriate PTM settings
Apply false discovery rate control (typically <1% at peptide level)
Validate unexpected modifications through synthetic peptide standards
Complementary Methods:
2D gel electrophoresis with specific PTM staining (Pro-Q Diamond for phosphorylation)
Site-directed mutagenesis of modified residues to assess functional significance
Antibodies against specific modifications for immunodetection
ATP synthase subunit c may undergo several PTMs that affect its function, including phosphorylation, acetylation, and oxidative modifications. Mapping these modifications under different physiological conditions provides insights into regulatory mechanisms governing ATP synthase activity in chloroplasts.
Designing effective CRISPR/Cas9 experiments for studying the atpH gene requires careful consideration of the unique challenges associated with chloroplast-targeted proteins and essential metabolic functions:
Strategic Considerations:
Gene Essentiality Management: Complete knockout of atpH may be lethal, so consider:
Inducible CRISPR systems (using dexamethasone-inducible promoters)
Tissue-specific promoters (mesophyll-specific or developmentally regulated)
Creating knockdown rather than knockout (CRISPRi approach with dCas9)
Heteroplasmy management strategies for chloroplast genome editing
Guide RNA (gRNA) Design:
Target regions with minimal off-target potential in the rice genome
Design 2-3 gRNAs per target region to increase editing efficiency
Avoid regions with secondary structure that might impede Cas9 access
Use rice-optimized U6 or U3 promoters for gRNA expression
Implementation Protocol:
Vector Construction:
Clone rice codon-optimized Cas9 and gRNAs into a binary vector
Include appropriate selectable markers (hygromycin or kanamycin resistance)
Delivery Methods:
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of rice callus
Protoplast transformation for transient expression and validation
Biolistic delivery for direct chloroplast transformation
Screening and Validation:
Initial PCR screening followed by Sanger sequencing
T7 Endonuclease I assay for mutation detection
Deep sequencing for comprehensive mutation profiling
Phenotypic Analysis Approach:
Monitor photosynthetic parameters (Fv/Fm, ETR, NPQ) using chlorophyll fluorescence
Assess ATP/ADP ratios in leaf tissue using bioluminescence assays
Measure growth parameters under different light intensities
Evaluate stress responses, particularly to high light and temperature fluctuations
Table 2: Potential gRNA Target Sites for atpH in Japonica Rice
Target Region | gRNA Sequence (5'-3') | PAM | Predicted Efficiency | Off-target Score |
---|---|---|---|---|
Exon 1 | GCTTCGCAAGTCTAGCAAGG | TGG | 0.72 | 0.92 |
Junction site | ATGGCTACTGCAACCGTAGT | AGG | 0.68 | 0.89 |
Promoter | TCGATCGATTCGAGCTAATC | CGG | 0.65 | 0.95 |
Note: Efficiency and off-target scores are theoretical predictions based on typical CRISPR design algorithms.
For studying subtle functional changes, researchers should consider creating specific point mutations rather than complete gene disruption, as this may reveal structure-function relationships while maintaining cell viability.
Recombinant expression of ATP synthase subunit c poses several challenges due to its hydrophobic nature and role as a membrane protein. Here are the most common issues and their methodological solutions:
Solution: Use tightly controlled induction systems (e.g., pBAD or T7lac promoters) with minimal leaky expression
Methodology: Begin with low inducer concentrations (0.01-0.1 mM IPTG) and short induction periods (3-4 hours)
Alternative Approach: Use specialized E. coli strains like C41(DE3) and C43(DE3) specifically developed for toxic membrane proteins
Solution: Reduce expression temperature to 16-20°C after induction
Methodology: Add fusion partners that enhance solubility (MBP, SUMO, or Trx tags)
Recovery Protocol: If inclusion bodies form, implement a specialized refolding protocol using a urea gradient (8M to 0M) in the presence of lipids or detergents
Solution: Optimize codon usage for the expression host
Methodology: Increase scale while maintaining optimal cell density (OD600 = 0.6-0.8 at induction)
Enhancement Strategy: Supplement growth media with specific components (0.2% glucose pre-induction, 1% ethanol post-induction)
Solution: Co-express with appropriate chaperones (GroEL/ES, DnaK/J)
Methodology: Include lipids or detergent mixtures in the growth media
Verification Technique: Use circular dichroism to confirm secondary structure integrity
Table 3: Optimization Matrix for Recombinant ATP Synthase Subunit c Expression
Parameter | Standard Condition | Optimization Range | Effect on Expression |
---|---|---|---|
Temperature | 37°C | 16-30°C | Lower temp: ↑ solubility, ↓ yield |
IPTG concentration | 1.0 mM | 0.01-0.5 mM | Lower IPTG: ↓ toxicity, ↑ solubility |
Induction OD600 | 0.6 | 0.4-1.2 | Higher OD: ↑ biomass, ↑ total yield |
Expression time | 4 hours | 3-24 hours | Longer time: ↑ yield, ↑ degradation risk |
Media | LB | TB, 2YT, M9 | Richer media: ↑ yield, ↑ inclusion bodies |
A systematic approach testing multiple conditions is recommended, with small-scale expression tests (5-10 mL cultures) before scaling up to larger volumes.
Analyzing the impact of point mutations on ATP synthase subunit c requires a systematic approach combining in vitro and in vivo methodologies:
In Vitro Functional Assessment:
ATP Hydrolysis/Synthesis Assays:
Reconstitute purified mutant proteins into liposomes
Measure ATP synthesis using luciferin/luciferase assays
Assess ATP hydrolysis through phosphate release detection
Calculate enzymatic parameters (Km, Vmax, kcat) for comparative analysis
Proton Translocation Assays:
Use pH-sensitive fluorescent dyes (ACMA or pyranine)
Measure proton pumping efficiency across proteoliposome membranes
Determine H⁺/ATP ratios for mutant versus wild-type proteins
In Vivo Functional Studies:
Complementation Assays:
Express mutant variants in atpH-deficient backgrounds
Measure growth rates under photosynthetic conditions
Assess ATP levels in transformed lines
Physiological Measurements:
Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis (Fv/Fm, NPQ, ETR)
Photosynthetic oxygen evolution measurements
Growth analysis under varying light conditions
Structural Impact Assessment:
Molecular Dynamics Simulations:
Model the effect of mutations on protein stability and interactions
Calculate free energy differences between wild-type and mutant structures
Analyze proton access pathways through the c-ring
Experimental Structure Determination:
Cryo-EM analysis of assembled ATP synthase complexes
HDX-MS to probe conformational changes induced by mutations
Table 4: Critical Residues in ATP Synthase Subunit c and Their Functional Significance
Residue Position | Conserved Amino Acid | Function | Effect of Mutation |
---|---|---|---|
Glu61 (example) | Glutamate | Proton binding site | Loss of proton translocation |
Arg41 (example) | Arginine | Interaction with a-subunit | Reduced complex stability |
Gly27 (example) | Glycine | Helix flexibility | Altered rotation mechanics |
Leu31 (example) | Leucine | Hydrophobic packing | Disrupted c-ring assembly |
Note: Exact residue positions would depend on the specific sequence of japonica rice ATP synthase subunit c.
When analyzing mutations, researchers should prioritize residues that are highly conserved across species, as these are most likely to serve critical functional roles in the ATP synthase complex.
For Comparative Studies (Wild-type vs. Mutant/Treatment):
Parametric Tests:
Student's t-test for two-group comparisons (with normality verification)
ANOVA with post-hoc tests (Tukey's HSD or Bonferroni) for multiple group comparisons
Paired t-tests for before/after comparisons on the same samples
Non-parametric Alternatives:
Mann-Whitney U test (for non-normal two-group comparisons)
Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's post-hoc test (for multiple non-normal groups)
Wilcoxon signed-rank test (for paired non-normal data)
For Correlation and Regression Analysis:
Simple/Multiple Linear Regression:
For predicting continuous outcomes based on experimental variables
Example application: Predicting ATP synthesis rates based on multiple factors
Model validation through residual analysis and cross-validation
Specialized Regression Models:
Non-linear regression for enzyme kinetics data (Michaelis-Menten, Hill equation)
Mixed-effects models for repeated measures designs
As demonstrated in the research on japonica rice eating quality, multiple regression analysis can effectively relate marker genotypes to phenotypic traits with high predictive power (R² values up to 0.99) . This approach can be adapted for analyzing relationships between ATP synthase genetic variants and functional outcomes.
Data Visualization Recommendations:
Box plots or violin plots for group comparisons
Scatter plots with regression lines for correlation analysis
Heatmaps for visualizing patterns across multiple variables
Forest plots for meta-analysis of replicated experiments
Statistical Power Considerations:
Conduct a priori power analysis to determine appropriate sample sizes
For typical biochemical assays, aim for n≥3 biological replicates
For physiological measurements with higher variability, consider n≥5
Report effect sizes (Cohen's d, η²) alongside p-values
Table 5: Recommended Minimum Sample Sizes for Different Experimental Designs
Statistical Test | Effect Size | Power (1-β) | α | Minimum Sample Size |
---|---|---|---|---|
t-test (independent) | Large (d=0.8) | 0.8 | 0.05 | n=26 (total) |
t-test (independent) | Medium (d=0.5) | 0.8 | 0.05 | n=64 (total) |
ANOVA (3 groups) | Large (f=0.4) | 0.8 | 0.05 | n=66 (total) |
Correlation | Medium (r=0.3) | 0.8 | 0.05 | n=84 |
Researchers should employ appropriate statistical software (R, GraphPad Prism, or SPSS) and report complete statistical parameters including test statistics, degrees of freedom, p-values, and confidence intervals.
Several cutting-edge technologies are positioned to significantly advance our understanding of ATP synthase subunit c function and regulation in the coming years:
Structural Biology Advances:
Time-resolved Cryo-EM: Capturing intermediate states during the rotational catalysis cycle of ATP synthase with millisecond temporal resolution.
Integrative Structural Biology: Combining multiple techniques (X-ray crystallography, NMR, SAXS) to build comprehensive models of the entire ATP synthase complex.
In-cell NMR: Examining conformational dynamics of ATP synthase components within intact chloroplasts.
Single-Molecule Techniques:
High-Speed Atomic Force Microscopy: Visualizing conformational changes of individual ATP synthase complexes during catalysis.
Optical Tweezers and Magnetic Tweezers: Measuring torque generation and mechanochemical coupling in reconstituted ATP synthase systems.
Single-molecule FRET: Tracking distance changes between labeled subunits during rotational catalysis.
Genome Engineering Approaches:
Base Editing and Prime Editing: Making precise nucleotide changes in the atpH gene without double-strand breaks.
Chloroplast-specific CRISPR Systems: Directly editing the chloroplast genome to modify atpH in situ.
Synthetic Biology Redesign: Engineering optimized versions of ATP synthase subunit c with enhanced performance characteristics.
Advanced Imaging:
Super-resolution Microscopy: Visualizing ATP synthase distribution and clustering in thylakoid membranes below the diffraction limit.
Correlative Light and Electron Microscopy (CLEM): Connecting functional states with structural arrangements in native membranes.
Label-free Imaging: Using techniques like Coherent Raman Scattering to observe ATP synthase without potentially disruptive labels.
These technologies promise to resolve longstanding questions about how this small but critical protein contributes to the remarkable efficiency of biological energy conversion in chloroplasts.
Comparative genomics approaches offer powerful frameworks for understanding the evolutionary history and functional diversity of the atpH gene across rice varieties:
Methodological Approaches:
Pan-genome Analysis:
Construct a rice pan-genome incorporating multiple high-quality japonica and indica assemblies
Identify core, dispensable, and variety-specific elements related to atpH
Analyze structural variations in the gene region (CNVs, presence/absence variants)
Phylogenomic Analysis:
Reconstruct the evolutionary history of atpH across Oryza species and close relatives
Apply selection pressure analysis (dN/dS ratios) to identify adaptively evolving sites
Use ancestral sequence reconstruction to trace the evolutionary trajectory of key functional residues
Population Genomics:
Analyze atpH sequence variation across diverse rice populations (3,000 Rice Genomes Project data)
Identify SNPs, haplotypes, and linkage blocks associated with environmental adaptations
Conduct genome-wide association studies linking atpH variants to phenotypic traits
Implementation Strategy:
Extract and align atpH sequences from multiple rice varieties and wild relatives
Calculate sequence diversity parameters (π, θ, Tajima's D) to identify signatures of selection
Correlate sequence variants with environmental parameters from collection sites
Validate functional consequences through targeted experiments
The PCR marker-based evaluation approach demonstrated for eating quality traits in japonica rice provides a model for relating genetic markers to functional outcomes that could be adapted to study ATP synthase function across varieties.
Table 6: Example of atpH Sequence Diversity Parameters Across Rice Varieties
Rice Group | Number of Varieties | Nucleotide Diversity (π) | Tajima's D | Selection Inference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Temperate japonica | 45 | 0.00123 | -1.87 | Purifying selection |
Tropical japonica | 38 | 0.00156 | -0.98 | Neutral evolution |
Indica | 78 | 0.00245 | 0.34 | Balancing selection |
Wild relatives | 15 | 0.00587 | 1.56 | Population structure |
Note: Values in this table are hypothetical and would be determined through actual sequence analysis.
Comparative genomics approaches can reveal how natural selection has optimized ATP synthase function across different environments and provide insights into the molecular basis of adaptation to diverse ecological niches.