Recombinant Oryza sativa subsp. japonica Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 (COX2) is a component of cytochrome c oxidase (Complex IV), the terminal enzyme in the mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC). The ETC, comprised of Complexes I-IV, facilitates oxidative phosphorylation by transferring electrons from NADH and succinate to molecular oxygen. This process generates a proton gradient across the inner mitochondrial membrane, driving ATP synthesis. COX2 plays a crucial role in this process. Specifically, COX2's dinuclear copper A center (CuA) and heme A facilitate electron transfer from reduced cytochrome c in the intermembrane space to the binuclear center (BNC) in subunit 1. The BNC, consisting of heme a3 and copper B (CuB), catalyzes the reduction of molecular oxygen to water, utilizing four electrons from cytochrome c and four protons from the mitochondrial matrix.
STRING: 39947.LOC_Osm1g00330.1
Oryza sativa COX2 (P04373) is the subunit 2 of cytochrome c oxidase, a component of the respiratory chain that catalyzes oxygen reduction to water in mitochondria. It functions as part of the electron transport chain in oxidative phosphorylation .
This protein should not be confused with mammalian cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), which is an enzyme involved in prostaglandin synthesis and inflammatory processes . The similarity in abbreviations creates confusion in literature, but these proteins have entirely different structures, functions, and evolutionary origins.
Key differences include:
| Feature | Oryza sativa COX2 | Mammalian COX-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Function | Electron transport in respiration | Prostaglandin synthesis |
| Cellular location | Mitochondrial inner membrane | Endoplasmic reticulum membrane |
| Size | 260 amino acids, ~30 kDa | 604 amino acids, ~70 kDa |
| Inhibitors | Cyanide, azide | NSAIDs, coxibs |
| UniProt ID | P04373 | Various (e.g., P35354 for human) |
Recombinant Oryza sativa COX2 has been successfully expressed in E. coli systems with N-terminal His-tags to facilitate purification . While bacterial expression is common for basic structural studies, researchers should consider the following systems based on research objectives:
| Expression System | Advantages | Disadvantages | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yield, cost-effective, rapid | Limited post-translational modifications | Structural studies, antibody production |
| Insect cells (Sf21) | Better folding, some post-translational modifications | Higher cost, slower, lower yield | Functional studies requiring proper folding |
| Plant-based systems | Native post-translational modifications | Complex setup, low yield | Studies requiring authentic plant modifications |
For functional studies of respiratory chain components, baculovirus-infected insect cell systems (similar to those used for human COX-2 expression) may provide better results as they support proper folding of membrane proteins .
For optimal purification of active recombinant COX2 from Oryza sativa, a multi-step approach yields the best results:
Initial extraction: Use buffer containing 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0) with 1% mild detergent (DDM or Triton X-100) to solubilize membrane-associated protein
Affinity purification: If His-tagged, use Ni-NTA chromatography with imidazole gradient elution (20-250 mM)
Secondary purification: Size exclusion chromatography to separate aggregates and obtain homogeneous protein
Storage conditions: Store in 50 mM Tris buffer (pH 8.0) with 6% trehalose to maintain stability, aliquot and store at -80°C to prevent freeze-thaw cycles
The purified protein can be assessed for purity using SDS-PAGE, with expected apparent molecular weight of approximately 30 kDa .
COX2 functions as part of the cytochrome c oxidase complex, so activity assays typically measure the complete complex rather than isolated subunits. For functional studies, researchers can:
Incorporate purified COX2 into liposomes with other necessary subunits to reconstitute the complex
Measure oxygen consumption using a Clark-type oxygen electrode or fluorescence-based oxygen sensors
Track electron transfer using cytochrome c oxidation assays by monitoring absorbance changes at 550 nm
Assess membrane potential generation using potential-sensitive dyes in reconstituted systems
For comparison with human COX enzymes, activity can be measured similar to human COX-2 assays, using:
Fluorescent detection with Amplex Ultra Red (similar to the method described for human COX-2)
Monitoring oxygen consumption coupled to cytochrome c oxidation
Recombinant Oryza sativa COX2 serves as a valuable tool for studying:
Respiratory chain function in plant mitochondria, particularly under stress conditions
Evolutionary adaptation of respiratory proteins across plant species
Structural analysis of plant-specific features of the cytochrome c oxidase complex
Development of mitochondrial markers for studying organelle dynamics in plant cells
Cross-species comparison of respiratory chain components to understand adaptation to different environmental conditions
Researchers use recombinant COX2 as a standard for quantitative assessments in Blue Native-PAGE (BN-PAGE) and Western blot applications when studying plant mitochondrial composition .
Comparative analysis reveals both conserved and variable regions in COX2 across plant species:
| Species | Sequence Identity to O. sativa COX2 | Key Differences | Notable Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arabidopsis thaliana | ~85% | N-terminal region variation | Smaller size (29.4 kDa) |
| Cucumis sativus | ~80% | Metal-binding region variations | Similar functional domains |
| Physcomitrella patens | ~75% | More divergent sequences | Ancient lineage comparison |
| Triticum aestivum | ~95% | High conservation | Monocot similarity |
These differences provide insights into the evolution of respiratory complexes in plants. Conserved regions typically correspond to functional domains involved in electron transfer and oxygen binding .
Yes, Oryza sativa COX2 serves as an excellent model for cross-species studies of mitochondrial function due to its:
High conservation of functional domains across plant species
Availability of antibodies that cross-react with COX2 from multiple plant species including Arabidopsis thaliana, Hordeum vulgare, Triticum aestivum, and Zea mays
Well-established expression systems that can be adapted for comparative studies
For mitochondrial localization studies, anti-COX2 antibodies have been successfully used as mitochondrial inner membrane markers across diverse plant species . This consistent detection makes it valuable for:
Comparative studies of mitochondrial respiratory efficiency
Analysis of evolutionary adaptations in plant respiratory systems
Assessment of mitochondrial responses to environmental stresses
Researchers frequently encounter these challenges when working with recombinant COX2:
Poor expression yields:
Solution: Optimize codon usage for expression host
Alternative: Use fusion partners (MBP, SUMO) to enhance solubility
Protein misfolding:
Solution: Express at lower temperatures (16-18°C)
Alternative: Use membrane-mimicking detergents during purification
Loss of activity during purification:
Solution: Include cofactors (heme) in purification buffers
Alternative: Minimize exposure to harsh conditions (extreme pH, high salt)
Aggregation during storage:
Difficulty distinguishing from endogenous COX2:
Solution: Use epitope tags for detection and quantification
Alternative: Employ species-specific antibodies for differential detection
Leading-edge research on Oryza sativa COX2 employs several sophisticated techniques:
Cryo-electron microscopy for high-resolution structural analysis of the intact cytochrome c oxidase complex
Site-directed mutagenesis to assess the importance of specific residues for electron transfer and oxygen binding
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to map conformational changes during the catalytic cycle
Blue Native-PAGE combined with activity staining to study complex assembly and stability
Reconstitution into nanodiscs for functional studies in a membrane-like environment
Molecular dynamics simulations to understand protein-lipid interactions and conformational dynamics
These advanced approaches provide deeper insights into how COX2 functions in the context of the complete cytochrome c oxidase complex and the mitochondrial respiratory chain.
The similar abbreviations but distinct functions of plant COX2 (cytochrome c oxidase) and mammalian COX-2 (cyclooxygenase) create significant potential for confusion. Researchers should:
Use precise terminology in publications and protocols:
Refer to the rice protein as "cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2" or "Complex IV subunit 2"
Use full protein names in methods sections and figure legends
Verify reagent specificity:
Confirm antibody specificity against the intended target
Check cross-reactivity with both forms if working with heterologous systems
Consider distinct detection methods:
Plant COX2: Detected using mitochondrial function assays
Mammalian COX-2: Typically assessed through prostaglandin production
Be aware of inhibitor specificity:
NSAIDs and coxibs target mammalian COX-2, not plant COX2
Respiratory inhibitors like antimycin affect plant COX2 function
Despite their different functions, studying both proteins provides interesting comparative insights:
Interestingly, rice bran constituent tricin has been shown to inhibit mammalian COX-2 with IC₅₀ values of approximately 1 μmol/L, demonstrating potential crosstalk in research with mixed plant and animal systems .
Several approaches are effective for studying COX2 interactions:
Co-immunoprecipitation using COX2-specific antibodies to pull down interaction partners
Blue Native-PAGE to preserve native protein complexes for analysis of COX2 within the cytochrome c oxidase complex
Proximity labeling techniques (BioID, APEX) to identify proteins in close proximity to COX2 in vivo
Yeast two-hybrid screening with membrane-specific variants to identify direct interaction partners
Crosslinking mass spectrometry to map interaction interfaces within the respiratory complex
The STRING database provides a valuable resource for predicting COX2 interaction partners based on various evidence types, showing strong interactions with other respiratory chain components .
Researchers can employ these methods to study COX2 integration:
Reconstitution experiments using purified components to rebuild functional complexes in vitro
Complementation studies in COX2-deficient systems to assess functional rescue
Activity assays comparing native versus reconstituted complexes:
Oxygen consumption rates
Electron transfer efficiency
Proton pumping capacity
Structural analysis techniques:
Cryo-EM of reconstituted complexes
Small-angle X-ray scattering for solution structure
Membrane integration studies using liposomes of defined composition to assess how lipid environment affects complex assembly and function